Evidence for direct repression of nitrogenase by ammonia in the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica

Evidence for direct repression of nitrogenase by ammonia in the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 835-844 January 29, 1986 EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT REPRESSION OF NITROGE...

411KB Sizes 0 Downloads 51 Views

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Pages 835-844

January 29, 1986

EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT REPRESSION OF NITROGENASE BY AMMONIA IN THE CYANOBACTERIUM ANABAENA CYLINDRICA

Alison H. Mackerras and Geoffrey D. Smith Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, The Australian National University, G.P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia Received December 13, 1985

SUMMARY The nitrogenase a c t i v i t y of the cyanobacterium Anabaena cy-~i ca was repressed u p o n addi t i on of ammonium salts after preincubation in the presence of a concentration of L-methionine-DLsulfoximine s u f f i c i e n t to t o t a l l y i n h i b i t glutamine synthetase. Repression was also observed when urea was added to c e l l s in the presence of the glutamine synthetase i n h i b i t o r . Measurements of ammonia concentrations were made in each case and provided evidence that ammonia i t s e l f is a primary regulator of nitrogenase levels in A. c y l i n d r i c a . ® ~986A~ade~icPr.... Inc.

Nitrogenase and

heterocyst synthesis in cyanobacteria are subject

to regulation by a product of nitrogen f i x a t i o n

(I).

regulatory

and

molecule

is

uncertain.

Stewart

The i d e n t i t y of this Rowell

evidence, based on use of the glutamine synthetase i n h i b i t o r

(2)

presented

L-methionine-

DL-sulfoximine (MSOX)I, that ammonia i t s e l f was not the regulator and that glutamine or some other simple derivative of ammonia was l i k e l y to be the regulatory molecule. recently Singh et al.

More recent data have contradicted these findings and (3) and Turpin et al.

(4) have suggested that the

e a r l i e r work was indeed consistent with ammonia i t s e l f regulator

of

nitrogen

fixation

conclusion by Turpin et al.

in

cyanobacteria.

being an important

The reason for

this

(4) was the suggestion that MSOX was a potent

i n h i b i t o r of ammonium ion transport into the c e l l s in addition to i t s role as a glutamine synthetase i n h i b i t o r

(4).

Other workers have disputed the

proposition that MSOX i n h i b i t s ammonium ion transport

IAbbreviation:

(5, 6) and therefore

MSOX, L-methionine-DL-sulfoximine. 0006-291X/86 $1.50 835

Copyright © 1986 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

the discrepant conclusions concerning ammonia repression alternative inhibitor

explanation. concentrations

We have

reinvestigated

and conditions

which give

may require

this

problem

total

inhibition

an

using of

glutamine synthetase.

We have also used urea as an a l t e r n a t i v e method for

allowing i n t r a c e l l u l a r

ammonia accumulation, based on the observation that

c e l l s grown in the presence of nickel

ions have an active urease a c t i v i t y

and that urea is r a p i d l y transported into c e l l s and converted to ammonia. This has allowed us to reassess the action of MSOX by e f f e c t i v e l y

allowing

transport of ammonia into c e l l s by a mechanism not involving the ammonium carrier.

We have

also

made detailed

ammonium ion

concentration

measurements and present results which provide strong confirmatory evidence that ammonia i t s e l f

is a potent regulator of nitrogenase synthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cyanobacteria and t h e i r growth. Anabaena c y l i n d r i c a (ATCC 27899) was obtained Trom the American Type Culture Collection and grown as in (7) except with the growth medium at I/8 concentration of all components except phosphate and nickel which were at f u l l strength and 4 x strength, respectively. Nickel-depleted c e l l s were grown as described previously (8). Cells were grown under n i t r o g e n - f i x i n g conditions, being continuously sparged during growth and the reported experiments with 0.3% CO2 in air at approx. 170 ml/min. The l i g h t i n t e n s i t y was 150 ~Es-lm -2 (photos y n t h e t i c a l l y active r a d i a t i o n ) . Cells were collected and used in the concentration range 80 to 170 K l e t t units (9) where nitrogenase a c t i v i t y was found to be maximal on a dry weight basis. For dry weight determination c e l l s were centrifuged, washed once, and then dried overnight at 85 C. Assays. Glutamine synthetase was assayed using the biosynthetic assay -(TOT_ Cells were harvested by centrifugation and concentrated in 50 mM Hepes/KOH, pH 7.5. They were passed through a French pressure cell at 138 MPa and the debris removed by centrifugation before the assay. MSOX was obtained from the Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA. Nitrogenase a c t i v i t y was measured by the acetylene reduction method as described previously ( I I ) . Acetylene reduction rates were measured over a 3 h assay period and are expressed as i n i t i a l rates. For ammonia determinations samples (I0 ml) were taken at appropriate i n t e r v a l s and centrifuged. Ammonia released into the medium was measured in duplicate aliquots of the supernatant with an Orion ammonia electrode (model no. 95-12), a f t e r adding NaOH (I0 M) to convert ammonium ions into free ammonia° Protein concentrations were measured by the method of Peterson (12). RESULTS When MSOX was added to whole c e l l s of A. c y l i n d r i c a glutamine synthetase a c t i v i t y

it

inhibited

in a time-dependent manner as shown in Fig. 836

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

E 0"0~ E -6 E ._~ 0"0~

.p,o o-o~ E

.~ O ~ E '5 0 2

Fig. ].

I.

4

6

8 10 Time (h)

12

1L

16

1'8

The effect of MSOX, added to growing cells of A. cylindrica, on glutamine synthetase a c t i v i t y . The MSOXwas added to give a f i n a l concentration of I0 ~M (0) or 1 mM (1), with a control (0) to which no addition was made. At the indicated times cells were harvested, extracted and assayed as quickly as possible (within 30 min)o A c t i v i t i e s are expressed per mg of protein.

Whereas I0 ~M MSOX produced t o t a l i n h i b i t i o n only a f t e r 12-24 h, a 1 mM

concentration of the i n h i b i t o r

produced complete i n h i b i t i o n w i t h i n 2 hours,

as with A. flos-aquae

We chose

preincubation

with

1 mM MSOX, f o r

quickness of a c t i o n . of the t e s t

(4).

The f i r s t

and control

preincubation.

to

do f u r t h e r

three

reasons

work in

using

addition

a 3 h to

the

was t h a t in three hours the concentrations

cells

diverged

little

Secondly, the e x t r a c e l l u l a r

compared with

a 12-24 h

ammonia concentration measured

a f t e r 3 h in the presence of MSOX was much lower (approx. 0 . I mM) than t h a t f r e q u e n t l y observed a f t e r

a 24 h preincubation with

I0 uM MSOX (0.5-0.6

mM). T h i r d l y , nitrogenase l e v e l s of c e l l s a f t e r 24 h incubation in I0 ~M MSOX were u s u a l l y depressed to a much greater extent than a f t e r a shorter incubation with the higher i n h i b i t o r concentration

of MS0X poses

preincubation

is

clearly

concentration.

problems of

insufficient

Thus use of the lower

interpretation

to

since

ensure complete

a shorter

inhibition

of

glutamine synthetase. For the reported experiments MSOX (I mM) was added and the c e l l s incubated in the l i g h t without the i n h i b i t o r

while

sparging with

were t r e a t e d s i m i l a r l y . 837

air/0.3% C 0 2 .

Control

cells

At the end of the incubation

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

100

S

8O

u

• ~

60

>

cJ

LO

c

& o

."2_ 2 O Z

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

Time (h) The effects of urea (o, o) and (NH4)2HPO~ I,FI) on the nitrogenase a c t i v i t y (measured as i n i t i a l rates) of A. c y lin d r ic a, harvested at 170 Klett units and preincubated either with (solid symbols) or without (open symbols) 1 mM MSOXfor 3 ho Control cultures with no added nitrogen source were tested s i m i l a r l y (A, A), Results are expressed as a percentage a c t i v i t y of the control to which no additions were made. The a c t i v i t y of the control culture was 370 nmol h-I mg-1 dry weight on the f i r s t day of the experiment and declined to 190 nmol h -I mg-I dry weight on the second day of the experiment due to aging. Zero time is that time at which the MSOX preincubation was commenced. The urea and ammonia were added at 3h.

c e l l s were d i v i d e d i n t o a l i q u o t s and then both t e s t incubated f u r t h e r

after

a d d i t i o n of e i t h e r

urea

and c o n t r o l c e l l s were (I

mM) or

(NH4)2HPO4 (I

mM), or w i t h o u t f u r t h e r a d d i t i o n s . Nitrogenase a c t i v i t y and again

after

overnight

was assayed immediately a f t e r these a d d i t i o n s incubation

(Fig.

2).

The c o n c e n t r a t i o n s

ammonium ions in the medium were also measured at i n t e r v a l s seen in totally

Fig.

2,

with

nickel-containing

cells,

nitrogenase

(Fig.

of

3).

As

activity

was

i n h i b i t e d w i t h i n 24 h by ammonium ions and by urea, whether or not

MSOX was present. led t o t o t a l

In the c o n t r o l c u l t u r e als o , the presence of MSOX alone

inhibition

of nitrogenase w i t h i n 24 h. 838

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

2o

~E

E

c o

'6

I-0

o o 0

g 05 E E

0

Fig. 3.

In

2

4 6 Time ( h )

22

24

Ammonia concentrations in the medium of cells to which additions of 1 mM urea (e, o), 1 mM (NH4)2HPO4 (I,[]) or no additions (A, a) were made. The c e l l s were preincubated as described in Fig. 2 and the solid and open symbols, together with the time scale, have the same significance as in that figure. The arrow indicates the time at which urea and ammonia were added. On the f i r s t day of the experiment the cell concentration was 0.34 mg dry weight per ml, corresponding to 170 Klett units. After overnight incubation the concentrations were 0.53 mg/ml (0), 0.54 mg/ml ( | ) , 0.27 mg/ml ([i]) 0.30 mg/ml (m), 0.44 mg/ml (a) and 0.33 mg/ml (A).

order

to

nitrogenase a c t i v i t y nickel-depleted

determine

whether

urea

itself

was a repressor

of

the above experiments were repeated w i t h urea added to

cells

which

were

devoid

of

urease

activity.

These

experiments ( r e s u l t s not shown) revealed t h a t urea i t s e l f

caused no loss of

nitrogenase a c t i v i t y

or w i t h o u t

urea,

and t h a t the e f f e c t s

were comparable w i t h

the r e s u l t s

of MSOX, w i t h of

Fig.

2.

Interestingly,

added after

o v e r n i g h t i n c u b a t i o n of such c e l l s w i t h urea the nitrogenase a c t i v i t y

was

50-100% more a c t i v e than t h a t of c o n t r o l c e l l s to which no urea was added. The reason f o r t h i s with

i s not known.

nickel-depleted

absence of MSOX;

cells

the

The corresponding ammonia measurements

showed no ammonia formation

presence

of

this 839

reagent

from urea in the

resulted

in

a rate

of

VoI. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

ammonia formation which was the same whether urea was added or not and was comparable

with

nitrogenase,

(0)

of Fig.

prepared

ammonium chloride

3.

Furthermore,

and assayed

as

in

experiments with c e l l - f r e e

(13),

revealed

(2 mM) nor urea (I mM) i n h i b i t e d

that

neither

nitrogenase d i r e c t l y

(results not shown). Several

conclusions

which are shown in Fig.

can be made from the

3.

First,

ammonia measurements

ammonia is consumed by the c e l l s

and

consumption is t o t a l l y prevented by the preincubation with MSOX. Secondly, under the conditions

of

these experiments cultures

alone produced ammonia, apparently at i n t r a c e l l u l a r t o t a l l y repress nitrogenase a c t i v i t y ; the control

no external

incubated with levels

sufficient

to

ammonia was produced by

culture to which no additions were made.

completely converted into ammonia within 24 h.

MSOX

Thirdly,

urea was

In the presence of MSOX the

ammonia produced was all released into the medium whereas in the absence of the i n h i b i t o r only a transient concentration of ammonia was observed since assimilatory processes were s t i l l still

sufficient

This concentration was c l e a r l y

to repress nitrogenase a c t i v i t y

the nitrogenase a c t i v i t y (20-22 h).

active.

(Fig.

2).

Interestingly

reappeared at the time of depletion of the urea

These results

show that

cells

of A. c y l i n d r i c a

convert urea

into ammonia f a s t e r than i t can be incorporated. The above experiments were repeated with a 24 h preincubation of the c e l l s in I0 ~M MSOX. those reported, glutamine

The results were q u a l i t a t i v e l y

despite the

addition

to

cells

problems

was also

Glutamine (I mM) produced a t o t a l although i t s

alluded

action could well

to

studied

inhibition

above. under

consistent with The e f f e c t

these

of

conditions.

of nitrogenase within

24 h,

have been via ammonia, which accumulated

s t o i c h i o m e t r i c a l l y from the glutamine in the presence of MSOX.

DISCUSSION

Our results provide strong evidence for a role of ammonia i t s e l f in

nitrogenase

repression

in

cyanobacteria. 840

In

the

presence

of

MSOX

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

ammonia was produced both from nitrogen f i x a t i o n containing c e l l s , r e s u l t i n g in total it

and from urea in nickel-

loss of nitrogenase within 24 h. Hence

is clear that urea transport into c e l l s

is

not i n h i b i t e d

that the ammonia which r e s u l t s from urease a c t i v i t y I t has been shown by Bone (14) that urea i t s e l f synthesis

of

nitrogenase

nickel-depleted c e l l s

in

and which

we

have

by MSOX and

represses nitrogenase.

is u n l i k e l y to repress the

demonstrated

urease a c t i v i t y

this

was absent

by

using

(results

not

shown).

Therefore, these urea results confirm the conclusion of Turpin et

al.

and others

(4)

that

ammonia plays

such a role

and contradict

the

contradiction

and

conclusion of Rowell and Stewart (2) that i t does not. There

may

be

particularly

why,

nitrogenase

repression°

concentrations

(I

in

several our

reasons

experiments, Rowell

~M) of

for

the

this

MSOX did

and

Stewart

inhibitor.

not

protect

(2)

used

As shown in

against

very

Fig. 1

a

low 3 h

preincubation with 1 mM MSOX was necessary to completely block glutamine synthetase a c t i v i t y . accumulated

in

significantly

the

One r e s u l t of this was that the ammonia levels which presence of

the

inhibitor

higher than those of Rowell

level of glutamine

synthetase a c t i v i t y

presumably quite s i g n i f i c a n t ,

our

and Stewart

within

experiments (2)

for

were

whom the

12 h of MSOX addition was

r e s u l t i n g in a depletion of the i n t r a c e l l u l a r

ammonia l e v e l , which may well be c r i t i c a l is concerned.

in

In the absence of

as far as nitrogenase repression

added f i x e d

nitrogen

there

are three

sources of ammonia, each of which may have been s i g n i f i c a n t in our c e l l s in contributing

to ammonia levels

presence of MSOX. The f i r s t

sufficient

to repress nitrogenase

of these is nitrogen f i x a t i o n

itself.

in

the

I t has

been shown previously (7, 15) that nitrogenase a c t i v i t y varies dramatically with the age of c e l l s and we were careful to harvest c e l l s when nitrogenase activity (16).

was maximal.

The second source of ammonia is

photorespiration

Although the cultures were sparged with air containing 0.3% CO2 t h i s

may not have been s u f f i c i e n t

to suppress photorespiration

The t h i r d source of ammonia is protein degradation (17). 841

entirely

(16).

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

In all our experiments the pH values were c a r e f u l l y monitored and shown to be in

the range 7 to

phosphate alone was added; experiment.

Thus the

7.4 except in

the

case where ammonium

in that case the pH dropped to 6.4 during the

pH was well

below the

pK of

ammonia and hence

comparable with the low pH experiments of Turpin et al.

(4) in which the

c e l l s would require operation of the ammonium ion c a r r i e r . (not reported)

Similar results

were obtained when the experiments were done with

resuspended in I0 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.1, as used by Turpin et al. also obtained similar

results

using

doubled concentrations

of

cells (4). We

urea and

ammonia. That the e f f e c t

of ammonia was not d i r e c t l y

on the nitrogenase

i t s e l f was shown by experiments (results not shown) in which i t to c e l l - f r e e extracts of nitrogenase; i n h i b i t i o n of a c t i v i t y . many n i t r o g e n - f i x i n g (18).

Furthermore,

was added

neither ammonia nor urea gave any

Similar results have been obtained with ammonia in bacteria, it

is

excluding unlikely

the

that

non-sulfur the

purple

effect

of

bacteria

ammonia in

suppressing nitrogenase is due to an e f f e c t as an uncoupler on the energy or reductant generating systems since this organism is

able to grow well

with ammonia concentrations s i g n i f i c a n t l y higher than those used herein (2, 19).

Ammonia has also been postulated to i n h i b i t

nitrogenase by competing

with i t for ATP and/or reductant (20, 21) but c l e a r l y t h i s would not be the case when i t s time

incorporation

course of

nitrogenase

is i n h i b i t e d by MSOX (21). activity

loss

observed

progressive decline, more consistent with an e f f e c t than d i r e c t i n h i b i t i o n . of

nitrogenase

differentiation inhibition

at

in

2 shows a

on protein

that

some stage

to

ammonia declines

nitrogenase during

differentation.

used herein would have contained at least

It

synthesis

heterocyst

is

to not

ammonia easy

since c l e a r l y

a proportion

heterocyst c e l l s at all stages during the experiments. 842

during

becomes r e f r a c t o r y

reconcile these observations with the present results cells

Fig.

the

I t has been suggested (22, 23) that the s e n s i t i v i t y

synthesis and

Furthermore,

to the

of mature

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

The d e f i n i t i v e effectively

transportS

aspect of this

work was the

ammonia into

cells

requiring the ammonium transport system. on this urea produces ammonia. in

the

cells

confirmation

resulting that

in

under

use of

urea which

conditions

without

The subsequent action of urease

In the presence of MSOX ammonia accumulates nitrogenase

ammonia i t s e l f

is

repression.

We take

a primary regulator

of

this

as

nitrogenase

levels in A. cylindrica.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Australian Research Grants Scheme (Grant No. D283154661) and the

Australian

financial

National

assistance

for

performing the c e l l - f r e e

University this

work.

Faculties We thank

Research Fund provided Dr D.M. Pederson for

nitrogenase assays and A. Daday for

assistance

with the glutamine synthetase assays.

REFERENCES .

2. 3. 4.

5. 6. 7. 8. 9. I0. II. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Stewart, W.D.P. (1973). Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 27, 283-316. Stewart, W.D.P. and Rowell, P. (1975). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 65, 846-856. Singh, H.N., Rai, U.N., Rao, V.V. and Bagchi, S.N. (1983). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. I I I , 180-187. Turpin, D.H., Edie, S.A. and Canvin, D.T. (1984). Plant Physiol. 74, 701-704. Boussiba, S. and Gibson, J. (1985). FEBS Lett. 180, 13-16. Rai, A.N., Rowell, P. and Stewart, W.D.P. (1984). Arch. Microbiol. 137, 241-246. Daday, A., Platz, R.A. and Smith, G.D. (1977). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34, 478-483. Daday, A., Mackerras, A.H. and Smith, G . D . (1985). J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, 231-238. Mallette, M.F. (1969). Methods Microbiol. l, 521-566. Dharmawardene, M.W.N., Haystead, A. and Stewart, W.D.P. (1973). Arch. Mikrobiol. 90, 281-295. Lambert, G.R. and Smith~ G.D. (1980). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 205, 36-50. Peterson, G.L. (1977). Analyt. Biochem. 83, 346-356. Hallenbeck, P.C., Kostel, P.J. and Benemann, J.R. (1979). Eur. J. Biochem. 98, 275-284. Bone, D.H. (1972i. Arch. Mikrobiol. 86, 13-24. Weare, N.M. and Benemann, J.R. (1973). Arch. Mikrobiol. 93, 101-112. Bergman, B. (1984). Arch. Microbiol. 137, 21-25. Lambert, G.R. and Smith, G.D. (1981). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 211, 360-367. 843

Vol. 134, No. 2, 1986 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Gordon, J.K., Shah, V.K. and B r i l l , W.J. (1981). J. Bacteriol. 148, 884-888. Daday, A~, Lambert, G.R. and Smith, G.D. (1979). Biochem. J. 177, 139-144. Ohmori, M. and Hattori, A. (1974). Plant and Cell Physiol. 15, 131-142. Ohmori, M. and Hattori, A. (1978). Arch. Microbiol. 117, 17-20. Murry, M.A. and Benemann, J.R. (1979). Plant and Cell Physiol. 20, 1391-1401. Murry, M.A., Jensen, D.B. and Benemann, J.R. (1983). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 756, 13-19.

844