Evidence for hindered rotation of ethyl groups around sp2sp3 bonds : N-alkyl Δ4-thiazoline-2-thiones.

Evidence for hindered rotation of ethyl groups around sp2sp3 bonds : N-alkyl Δ4-thiazoline-2-thiones.

Tetrahedron Lstters EVIDENCE N-ALKYL go. 24, pp I985 - 1988, 1975. FOR HINDERED ROTATION A4-THIAZOLINE-2-THIONES. R .GALLOa, A. LIDENb. Pergaao...

199KB Sizes 0 Downloads 3 Views

Tetrahedron Lstters

EVIDENCE N-ALKYL

go. 24, pp I985 - 1988,

1975.

FOR HINDERED ROTATION A4-THIAZOLINE-2-THIONES.

R .GALLOa,

A. LIDENb.

Pergaaon F+mss. printed in Great Britain.

OF ETHYL

GROUPS AROUND

J. SANDSTR6Mb

C .ROUSSELI.

sp2-sp3

and J. METZGER’

BONDS :

.

- Facult6 des Sciences de Saint-JkrameUniversit6 d’Aix-Marseille III aI.P.S.O.1. Rue Henri-Poincar6 - 13.397 - Marseille (Gdex 4) - France. b Division of Organic Chemistry - 1, Chemical Center - University of Lund - P.0.B.740. S-220 - Lund - 7, Sweden. (Received in UlI 18 April

Barriers

to rotation

1975; aooepted for publioation

I 34

of alhyl groups are of importance

1975)

to understand

1-3

. A number of cases of organic molecules 2 of alhyl groups about sp -sp3 bonds has been studied by D.N.M.R.

tions and reactivities

ture4-9,

but of alhyl groups of the type CH2R only neopentyl

We report here the dynamic the

A 4-thiaaoline-2-thione

I

a’

Ic, Models group in Ia arrangement pendicular

both conforma-

where hindered

rotation

are found in the litera-

groups have been dealt with7-?

behaviour

of neopentyl and ethyl groups in position 1 ring (I) as studied by H N.M.R.

R = t.Bu.

R4 = Me,

R5=H;

Ib. R = R3 = Me,

R4 = t.Bu

R = Me,

R4 = t.Bu.

R5=H;

Id. R = R4= Me.

R3 = H.

3 of

;

7-9 group indicate that this 10 shall have a nearly perpendicular arrangement , though in general a parallel 10.11 is assumed for the bensylic groups with at least one a-proton . The peras well as the known behaviour

arrangement

nous on slow rotation.

implies

diastereotopic

In agreement

of the neopentyl

methylene

with this the neopentyl

protons.

which become

methylene

protons

anisochro*

give one

1986

Ilo.24

Figure

1

_:::_

- ._.~ Figure

2

No. 24

1987

strongly (figure passage

broadened 1).

signal above t 25°C

The barrier

(AG’=

13.8

and an AB spectrum

kcal/mol)

is mainly

of the t-butyl group past the 4-methyl group, 12, 13 . The barrier to passage of a t-butyl

is 15.3

, which reflects

kcal/mo19

due to the strain created

which is the smaller

substituents series

below this temperature

group past a methyl

the angle differences

in five-

on the

of the flanking in the benzene

and six-membered

rings. The conformation gement smaller

(formula

II),

since the ethyl CH3 will be more

group.

2-CS

of the ethyl group in Ib and Ic may be closer

Also

in this conformation

repelled

the methylene

to the parallel

by the 4-t.Bu protons

arran-

than by the

are diastereotopic,

21

and the ethyl N.M.R. rature to an ABX3 resonance

resonance spectrum

at - 61°C

changes

from a sharp triplet

at lower temperatures

changes the methylene

(figure

resonance

and quartet

2). Irradiation

to an AB spectrum.

at ambient tempeof the ethyl CH3 The coalescence

temperature is the same, - 13°C , with and without decoupling, and the barrier t (AC = 12.1 kcal/mol) is probably mainly due to the compression caused by the passage of the ethyl past the CS group. passage

However,

some contribution

of the ethyl CH2 past the I-t.Bu,

as evidenced

probably

also comes

by the buttressing

from the

effect of the 5-CH3

group (Table). TABLE

Compound

AzB

196

t25

13.8

121

-16

12.1

IC

111

-34

11.2

Id

140b

-122

6.9

The large

toluene-c18at 100 MHz

In toluene-d$freon

Id shows a qualitatively

because AuAB

protons with respect

kcal/mol

Ib

b Compounds

AC:=

Ia

“In

temperature

T “C

Ha

of the smaller value for

similar

behaviour

as Ib, though at much lower

4-substituent.

Ia indicates

to the strongly

at 100 MHz

rather

deshielding

different

CS group.

positions

of the methylene

The somewhat

smaller

shifts

for

Ib

and

Ic

are in agreement

CH2 proton more

removed

with the proposed

conformation

from the CS group than in Ia.

II, with the low-field

The large

the rate processes

to be studied over a wide range of temperatures,

bandshape

are in progress.

analysis

To our knowledge, rotation

this constitubes the first 2 of ethyl groups around sp -sp3 bonds.

We are grateful Swedish National

to

C.N.R.S.

Science

de France

Research

council

observation

(A.T.P.

shifts values and complete

by D.N.M.R.

Internationale

for financial

allow

of hindered

9111) and to the

support.

REFERENCES 1.

G.

BINSCH.

Topics

in stereochemistry, Chem.

2.

H. KESSLER, 1.0.

SUTHERLAND in E. MOONEY, “Annual Reports vol. 4. Academic Press, 1971, pp 71 ff.

4.

A.

MANNSCHRECK

5.

A.

RIECKER

and L.

Int. Ed.,

ERNST,

and H. KESSLER,

SIDDALL

and W.E.

K.C. J.F.

6c.

A.

7.

D .T. DIX. G: 517 (1966).

8.

A.J.

REWERS, Tetrahedron

9.

B.

NILSSON, P. MARTINSSON, z, 3190 (1974) and earlier

Ber..

Tetrahedron

228 (1971)

and earlier

Chem.,

35.

1019 (1970).

and M.S.

NIEUWSTAD.

and J.’ SANDSTRhM. NEWMAN,

F.J.

K. OLSON and R.E. papers.

Tetrahedron

RANTWIJK

CARTER,

The dihedral angle between the N-C-R plane and the ring plane is 90”. and M.T. TRIBBLE, Tetrahedron Lett.. 3259 (1971).

11.

One

CH bond eclipses the ring plane . R. J. OUELLETTE. LEVIN and S. WILLIAMS, J. amer. them. Sot.. z,

12.

C.

ROUSSEL, submitted

A. LIDEN. M. GHANON. to J. amer . them. Sac .

13.

Nitrogen inversion since an X-Ray attached atoms

J. METZGER

Lett.,

and H.VAN

J. amer.

10.

C.

papers.

1227 (1969).

J; METZGER

KARNES

A. SINNEMA, T.,J. , 27, 3713 (1971).

Spectroscopy”.

WHITEHURST, W.B. WISE, R. MUKHERJEE. Org. Magn. Resoname,A 767 (1971).

LIDEN, C. ROUSSEL, M. CI-IANON, Tetrehedron Lett., 3629 (1974). H.A.

on N.M.R.

1%

Let?..,

J. Org.

RAMEY, D.J., LOUICK. P.W. ROSEN and R.M. MORIARTY,

FRAENKEL,

219 (1970).

Ghem.

STEWART.

6b.

&

97 (1968).

3.

6a. TH.

Angew.

A

B.K. SINHA, 7145 (1970).

BEKKUM

them.

Sot.,

N. L. ALLINGER J. STOLFO.

and J. STANDSTRCM,

cannot be responsible for the observed temperature dependence, crystallographic investigation shows that the ring and directly lie in one plane (G. PEPE. to be published).