Journal of MoIecular Structure, 111 (1983) 85-90 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam -Printed
EXACT
ANALYTIC
R. B.
CREEL
Physics
SOLUTION
and
OF THE
D. A.
Dept.,
SPIN
3/2
85 in The Netherlands
COHBINED
ZEEflAN-OUADRUPOLE
HAMILTONIAN
DRABOLD
University
of Akron,
Akron,
Ohio
44325
(USA)
ABSTRACT The secular equation arising from the combined spin 3/2 Zeeman-quadrupole Hamiltonian has recently been solved in analytic form (refs. 1,2). Energy level valid for all magnetic field strengths, are derived and frequency expressions, in a form highly suitable for analysis of resonance patterns arising from rotation of a single crystal about an axis perpendicular to the magnetic field direction. Theoretical rotation patterns are presented for the six possible transitions. A simple method for measurement of the quadrupole parameters is discussed.
INTRODUCTION Exact
expressions
interactions magnetic
of
the
(I = 3/2)
field
with
3-5).
Approximate
(refs.
6-8).
Recently,
using
relative are
spherical
to the
derived
specify
the
efg
axes
useful
crystal
about
SECULAR
EQUATION
Using
E”
- ;
Euler
x = Zu$(l
i = -2~
Q
$
E
been
obtained
by Goldstein
system,
with
the
frame.
field
l$
=
(ref.
field
+ 2rpkesin2$sin2+
-
0;
?-I(1+ cos26)cos2~]cos2~
+ 3cos%
This
general
the
exact Euler
field
equations angles
representation
by rotation
9),
to specify
H in the
i lOV2,
II; {[3sir?e
using
orientations the
of
paper,
axes
to is
of a single
direction.
is: +
for
direction
frequencies
laboratory
to the
the
of the
principal
arbitrary
derived
In this
1,2).
(efg)
for
were
to specify
(refs.
Zeeman-quadrupole orientations
gradient
derived
solutions
of patterns
as defined
laboratory
+ $/3)
0022-2860/83/SO3.00
analysis
combined
particular
field
transition
to the
perpendicular
angles,
equation E2 _
for
an axis
to the
secular
relative
axes and
for
have
analytic
coordinates
levels
of the
electric
solutions exact
principal
energy
levels obtained
to the
polar
for
particularly
relative
efg
been
respect
(refs.
case,
energy
have
- 1 - nsin2acos2$),
0 1983 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
the
x-direction,
efqaxes the
.. 86
::
-' : + 2n(l
z'= -,;(I +' +t/3)2 + ?v$${[3sin2@
- 3sin*e
t4ncosesin2$kin2$ Tine constant
+ 7 + 2nsinzecos2$
h has beenomitted
in the
be in frequency units; vB and n are If the field is chosen ve = yH/Z-. axis
perpendicular
EtiERGY LEVELS
to the
field
AND TRANSITION
The secular
equation
+ cos28)Cos2~
above
T +sfn2s3cos24
- $cos291
equations,
+ 9uk!
the
energy
(4) levels
will
the conventional quadrupole parameters, and to .be in the x-direction, rotation about an
changes
a single
angle,
@.
FREQUENCIES
yields
energy
levels
of the
form
(ref.
7):
Eq = jR.+ Dj/2 E3 = (R - 0)/Z E2 = -(R - S)/2 EI = -(R + 5),‘2,
(5)
where, if co53 = -[X3
- 36XZ - 53Y2]/(X2
R = 6-‘/‘[X
i- (X2
u =
[ax
+ f)
5 =
c$x _ f) _ We i7lustrate
-
+
+ 122)‘/*
12z)‘/2COS(5/3)j’/’
(6)
R2]:/2
(7)
R2]1/2
(8)
the
nature
of the
solutions by considering the simple case of Although this is a situation for which
H parallel. to the z’-axis of the efg. the secular equation is readily solved behavior of the elements R, D, and S. function
of v,
for
two values
(ref. Fig.
4), it 1 shows
‘leads to the most bizarre graphs of R, D, and S as a
of n.
2.0
0.0
LARh4OR FREQUENCY
Elements R, II, and ‘S as a function 1. v = 4. (a} n=O (b) n=l. ,a
4.0
6.0
LARMOR FREQUENCY iu,> nf va for
the
case
H parallel
to z’
87
same
The
energy
set
of
levels
constructed
parameters
used
from
in Fig.
Eqns.
obviously be-written as piecewise
linear
separate regions; v3 < v /2, v
2 v0 (V
-
Eqns.
5,
Es 2
El.
-9.0
the
ranking
Thus,
0.0
the
Fig. 2. = 4. % The E4 - E,, remaining
four
\Js = E2 - E1 = S are
shown
LARMOR
Fig. 3. = 4.
3.2 FREQUENCY
of v0 for
transitions,
are
graphed
high
field
directly
4.8 bv.1
Transition frequencies See text for notation.
levels
for
1.6
satellites, in
Fiq.
case
same
notation
of
3.2
4.8
FREQUENCY
H parallel
(v,)
to z' with
~3 = Ej - El,
oarameters
given
EL 2 E3 2
cross.
VL+ = EI+ - El, the
the can
three
the
maintained
never
the
with
With
.
LARMOR
Zeeman-quadrupole v1 = Es - E,,
1.6
but
2, with
the
(2
automatically touch,
in Fig. Za, 4,5)
v
-
k,)
Energy levels as a function (a) n = 0 (b) n = 1.
and
>
0.0
FRECUENCY
the
"Q
may
Fig.
(refs.
v0
4
is always
levels
, and
shown
to
functions
3.2
transitions,
0.0
Qi2
of levels energy
1.6 LARMOR
4
5 are
Referring
1.
in Fig.
1~2=
3.
by vs = EL - Es=
The 0 and
1.
0.0
1.6 LARMOR
as a function of v0 for (a) n = 0 (b) n = 1.
3.2
4.8
FREQUENCY
H parallel
(u,)
to z' with
SINGLE
CRYSTAL ROTATION PATTERNS-
Recently,. crystal
experimental
about-an
patterns
axis
_to extract
patterns
of frequencies
perpendicular
values
to the- field
of the quadrupole
(refs. 10. 11). Either perturbation ties have been used. With the.field
obtained
by rotating
have been fit
parameters.and
a single
to theoretical.
efg directions
theory or numerical ly calculated chosen in the x-direction,
the
frequen-. exact
solutions are in a form highly suitable for the analysis of rotation patterns evolving fromrotation of a crystal about an axis (z) perpendicular to- the field. With this geometry, rotation of the crystal changes a single Euler angle 0 with the other two, 6 and @,, remaining constant. Theoretical
rotation
patterns
of the energy levels
and transition
are Shown in Fig. 4, for Y& = v0 = 10, n = l/2, with the field plane of the crystal. The exact solutions should prove useful routines
where perturbation
theory
is not Sufficiently
frequencies
in the y’z’ in fitting
-
accurate.
18.2
CO'10.4
d
z -I
2.5
z u -g -5.2 ‘3 -13.1
-21.0
!
’
a 40
’
’ 80
ROTATION
Fig. 4. gotation (a) energy levels
’ 120
ANGLE
s
I 160
’
-,.o!
room temperature
I
I
single
I
I
r--r160
120
80
ROTATION
(PHI)
vj between the two lower levels
In the previous diagonalization
,
40
patterns with H in the y’z’ (b) transition frequencies.
We have reanalyzed the transition
’
ANGLE
(PHI)
- plane of the efg system, crystal (2 l/Z)
rotation’pattern
data for
in a-paradichlorobenzene.
analysis (ref. 12), the transition frequency was calculated by of the Hamiltonian matrix and compared to data in a three para-
meter fit (2 Euler. angles and n), taking into account chemical shift effects. In the reanalysis, in which chemical shift effects have been ignored, the exact equation
for
vS was &pared
three Euler angles. locating is shown in Fig_- 5.
to data in a five
parameter fit
the efg axes relative
(w,,
n, and the
to the sample tube).
The fit
a9
Fig. 5. Rotation pattern of transition v5 in a - paradichlorobenzene. Solip line is theory, cross marks are data.
. -_
-0.2
-1.2
ROTATION The
fit
+ 0.005, -
not
to O-8",
angles the
be
same
axis,
efg
axes
relative of
orientation
followed
S, which, (three
in turn,
eqn.
where,
the
to
chemical
shift
rotation
ANQLE (PHI) RADIANS obtained
shift
for
compared
effects
Euler
value were
angles;
32.7".
Since
bein
taken
the
into
-CI= -2.58'
6 is so
rotations
effects
of0.07iZ
small
almost
sign
of
0 + ':,can-
pattern.
ROTATIONS v5, and
lab
axes
n, and can,
Zeeman-quadrupole
by rotation
Y and can
independent)
from
chemical
1.8
the
three
Euler
in principle, transitions
of a single
crystal
be
at an by 4S0
anales
specifying
determined
from
initial
arbitrary
and
about
90°
an
to H.
coefficients
Y, = AcosP+,
for
four
perpendicular The
j,,
the
to the
previously
indistinguishable,
THREE
parameters,
the
obtained
19norin9 a single
FROM
quadrupole
measurement
axis
z.
to
since
was
virtually
from
PAWETERS
The
accurate
Q + $ = -32.3"
9 are
determined
compared
agreement
and
$ and
QUADRUPOLE
the
more
Reasonable
compared about
n = 0.0675
considered
account.
the
gave
0.8
Z (eqns.
be written
using
eqn.
3, 4) can
as functions (5).
For
be written of the
example,
in terms
four
at
the
of R,
transition initial
D, and
frequencies
orientation
(3), + Bsin24,
A, B, and
orientations
+ C,
C are of
(9)
functions
a, + 45"
and
of vO,
ho,
n, e, $ and
eO_
Using
Y1 and
Y,
6, + 90°1
Y1 = -Asin2+,
+ Bcos2+,
•i-C
(10)
Y2 = -Acos2+,
- Bcos20,
+ C.
(11)
Similar are
equations
independent,
frequency cos200.
there The
arise are are
Euler
for
the
obtained. enough
angles
function When
equations are
only
Z.
Thus,
combined
with
to solve
for
determined
six the v~,
within
equations, known
pure
n, cos%, the
of which
usual
four
quadrupole
~0~29,
and
multiplicities.
90
This
method
is
We know it
exact solution. appearance
of
the
fourth
power
highly
accurate,
not
on use of
based
information (eqn.
Relationships
of
the
quickly the
measure
results
points If
to
metry is
parameter.
straight
forward
Exact
if
theory
enter
in more detail
quick,
into
the
is used
coefficients
X, Y, and Z are
frequency
method which
will
at low fields.
to
but
vQ.
theory
form since
the
func-
frequencies
at low fields.
be satisfactory We would
through
at high since of
the efg
fields,
they
not
fitting
the
magnetic
using
secular
and shift
both
shift
may swamp effects equation tensors
tend to discuss this case in a future paper, in which be described
of
dis-
raised
to
expect
many data
and (11).
solution
provided
for
fraction
pure quadrupole
obtained
are
perturbation
in simpler
as those
performed
the
a sizeable
and the quantities
and angles (10)
v0 cc vB due to
be satisfactory
arise
a 3-rotation
as precise are
into
v0 is
but
the
about
as in refs.
measurements
be incorporated
should
in the
arising
error, when frequencies
(9-11)
frequencies,
parameters
be-nearly theory
for
the same form,
to devise the
be satisfactory
The parameters and angles
disposed
It may be possib!e
if
to eqns.
transitions
symmetrically
equations
round-off
measurements
similar
A, B, and C in exactly are
not
intermediate
The method
4).
instead of exact theory. tions
will
into
the
exact
effects
including are
the
should
from a small shift
and perturhation
effects We in-
coincident. rotation
asym-
method will
theory.
REFERENCES J. flagn. Reson. 52 (1983) 515. 1 R. B. Creel, 2 G. tl. Muha, J. Hagn. Reson. 53 (1983) 85. 3 c. Dean, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 1053. 4 A. Narath, Phys. Rev. A 140 (1965) 552. J. Chem. Phys. 51 (1974) 3658. 5 H. R. Brooker and I?. B. Creel, Toyama. J. Phys. Sot. Japan 14 (1959) 1727. ; !: H. Cohen and F. Reif, Solid State Phys. 5 (1957) 321 8 T. P. Das and E. L. Hahn, Solid State Phys. Suppl. 1 (1958) 24. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1959) 9 H. Goldstein, Chap. 4. 10 D. Giezendanner, 2. Sengupta, and G. Litzitorf, J. Hal. Struct. 58 (1980)519. 1.1 G. Litzitorf, S. Scngupta. and E. A. C. Lucken, J_ f!agn. Reson. 42(1981)307. 12
R. 8. Creel, E. von Heerwall, C. F. Griffin, 58 (1973) 4930.
and R. G. Barnes,
J.
Chem. Phys _