293
~~~O~~~~~~jC~, 156 (1988) 293-302 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
Examples of strike-ship tectonics on p~at~~r~-~asin margins CARLO DOGLIONI
(Received October 1,1987; revised version accepted April 18, 1988)
Abstract Doglioni, C., 1988. Examples of strike-slip tectonics on platfo~-baby
margins. ~~crono~~,vs~cs,1%: 293-302.
Examples from the Southern Alps (North Italy) serve to illustrate the use of carbonate platform-basin relations to recognize strike-slip tectonics and to estimate amounts of displa~ments~ It is noted that two~dimensionai cross-sections across strike-slip faults cannot be balanced and three-dimensional reconstructions would be necessary to restore original p~~g~~ap~c shapes of platfo~-basin margins. The main ~haract~stics of strike-slip tectonics are: (a} tectonic omission of fragments of the original t%rbonate platform-basin system in tw~dimens~ona~ section; fb) subvertical dip of the fault; (c)juxtaposition of differing thicknesses and facies of equivalent formations across faults, when these differences cannot be explained by normal growth faults; (d) anomalous tectonic wedging of subvertical basinal ductile sediments in the core of the carbonate platform. Normal faults cutting inclined slope margins may simulate apparent horizontal displacements. Platfo~-basin margins influence ~~R-S~M~ thrust tectonics in that overthrust ramps may be guided by clinoforms, and oblique or lateral ramps may develop along margins that are at an angSe of O”-70* to the main compressional axis.
Introdnction The Southern Alps (North Italy) exhibit excellent examples of Triassic platform-basin relationships, e.g., in the Dolomites (Bosellini, 1984). Platform-basin margins are mechanical dishomogeneities that influence later tectonics in all kinds of structural regimes. Moreover their articulate shape may help to unrave1 the kinematic evolution of a region. This paper aims at illustrating two particul~ly striking examples (the Passe Feudo and Raibl structures) of strike-slip tectonics affecting carbonate platforms margins, The Passo Feudo example
The Neogene S-verging Valsugana overthrust is overlain by a huge basement syncline. Well pre~#-195~/8g/$~3.50
@ 1988 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
served within that syncline are the classical Triassic sequences of the Dolomites (Leonardi, 1967; Bose&n, 1984). These are characterized by 800-1000 m thick carbonate platforms (Bosellini and Rossi, 1974), equivalent basinal formations, and by igneous complexes emplaced during a 217-230 m.y. old magmatic event (Lucchini et al., 1982). Middle Triassic structural deformation has been reported from the Dolomites (Cros, 1974; Pisa et al., 1979; Bosellini et al., 1982; Castellarin et al., 1982a, b; Doglioni, 1982; 1984a, b). These structures have been recently interpreted as being due to sinistral strike-slip along a N70 “E alignment known as the Stava fault and the northern limb of the Cima Bocche Anticline (Fig. 1 and Doglioni, 1984~1,b). A Middle Triassic age of deformation has been proven by (1) Late Ladinian volcanic dykes cutting pre-existing folds and faults, (2) the intrusion of the Predazzo and Monzoni plutonic
F‘ig. 1. Schematic
gtwlogic
C‘rma Bocche Anticline
map of the central
of the cross-section
as shown
carbonate
4 = Ladinian
platform;
Western
Dolomitrs.
trend is cut by the Late Ladinian-Early on Fig.
3. I = Quaternary
Note that the Middle-Triaaaic
Camian cover;
Staw
Predavo
and Monzoni
magmatlc
.? = Upper
Ladinian-Early
Car&n
Livinallongo Formation (hasinal faciea); .F = Anixan. Scvthian 6 = Permian volcanies; ? ==crystalline basement.
bodies along the N70” E alignment, and (3) volcaniclastic Ladinian and Camian deposits covering unconformably pre-existing overthrusts, folds and diapiric anticlines (Fig. 2). The Passe Feudo structure
The Passo Feudo structure (Fig. 3) is located in the western Dolomites (Fig. 1) along the Stava alignment. Positive flower structures have been described between the Stava and Trodena faults (Dogiioni, 1984a). East of Passe Feudo, the Stava Line is cut by the Upper Ladinian Predazzo magmatic body, proving the Middle Triassic age of that line. To the west, the Stava line joins with the Trodena line. The dip of the Stava fault changes
Line--northern centers.
‘4-A’
volcanics:
and Upper
Permian
limb of the ih the trace .i = Ladinian formations:
along strike, a common feature of wrench faults (e.g. Harding and Lowell, 1979). The most important observations on the Stava fault in the area shown as Fig. 3 are: (1) The Stava fault dips X5o to the north suggesting an uplifted hangingwall: (2) basinal sediments (Livinallongo Formation) are vertical on the north side of the fault and attached to the sub-horizontal undeformed core of the co-eval Ladinian carbonate platform (Marmolada Limestone); (3) the same basinal Livinaliongo Formation is thinner underneath the subhorizontal platform than in the vertical slice that is associated with the Stava fault; (4) Anisian Eacies and thicknesses differ on both sides of the Stava fault. i.e. the Moena Formation (basinal debris-flows) to the north and the Lower Serla and
295
Fig. 2. San Nicolo valley, central overlapping Permian
and “sealing” Bellerophon
unconformably
of volcanics
Werfen
formation
Conglomerato corresponding are aligned
Formation,
by an Upper
pebbles
and limestone. Marmolada
the N70°E
at the right)
conglomerate,
In the photograph (M).
Contrin The
of the Cima Bocche Anticline.
In this valley
not visible
(IV) and the Anisian
della
northward
tectonics.
Ladinian
to the outcropping along
Dolomites,
Ladinian
a diapiric and
the so-called
fault
Caotico
diapiric
(A) beneath
anticline
belt Stava fault and the northern Stava
the Lower
we see the northern
formation
and positive
Triassic
has
been
(CE).
eroded
are common.
and
anticline on
unconformity
in the core (Upper
subsequently
involving
The CE is overlain
superimposed
of the underlying
and shales
The CE is a debris
limb of the diapiric the unconformity.
of a Middle Triassic
gypsum
limb of the Cima Bocche anticline.
transpression
Contrin Formation (platform limestones) to the south (C. Net-i, pers. commun., 1987); (5) a cross section across the Stava fault cannot be balanced; (6) the thicknesses of two Ladinian carbonate platforms on either side of the fault differ by about 300 m, i.e. about 1000 m at M. Agnello, and 700 m at Latemar (R. Goldhammer, pers. commun., 1987); (7) Late Ladinian volcanic dykes cut the deformation. In the field these dykes clearly cut the chevron folds of the Livinallongo Formation at Passo Feudo. However, later Alpine folding deforms dykes as well as folds near the Stava line; (8) the chevron folds have an inclined axis and an en-echelon disposition with respect to the left-lateral Stava fault; (9) combined field map and facies analysis suggests that the Latemar platform to the north of the Stava fault apparently is displaced by 4-5 km from another platform fragment that is located on the south-side of the fault farther east (M. Harris, pers. commun., 1986).
An example
involving
eterogeneo
is presumably
flower geometries
(1984a, b) as due to sinistral
anticline
covered
flow that contains the lower Scythian
by the volcaniclastic
a deep-seated
basement
Many such diapiric
These have been interpreted
fault
anticlines
by Doglioni
basement.
These observations lead to the following conclusions: (a) The deformation observed on both sides of the fault (i.e. vertical basinal facies and horizontal co-eval platform) cannot be interpreted in terms of either normal faults or else thrust faults (Fig. 7); needless to say, a simple cross section across the fault cannot be reconstructed in a balanced cross section; (b) the above-mentioned situation suggests strike-slip faulting; (c) the different carbonate platform thicknesses on either side of the strike slip fault (Agnello and Latemar) suggest that the fault was also active during the Ladinian with a Stava strike-slip fault separating two different subsidence domains (Doglioni, 1984a; R. Goldhammer, pers. commun., 1987); (d) accepting an original sub-circular shape of the Ladinian Agnello platform (Fig. 1) we can imagine that the sub-vertical Livinallongo beds associated with the Stava fault were located in a basin that was originally to the east of the Agnello
S LINE M. Agnello
I km Fig. 3. Cross section
across
Stava fault line (for tocation
dimensions,
A two-dimensional
cross section
(Liu)
interrupt
parts
that
LP-Ladinian volcanic
different
carbonate
dykes;
platform;
PC-Upper
Formation
and
Lower
B-Upper
Permian
Serla
Dolomite
see Fig. 1). Obviously,
a strike-slip
of the essentially Lit+-Ladinian
Ladinian
Bellerophon
across
horizontal
Livinallongo
lavas and volcaniclastics; (footwdl
Formation: volcanic
fault cannot
of Stava V-Upper
carbonate Formation
A -Upper fault,
Permian
Neri,
platform (Fig. 8A); such a sinistrai displacement along the Stava fault is further supported by the orientation of the en-echelon overthrusts and associated Riedel wedges, as well as by flower structures and striations (for this documentation see Doglioni, 1984a, b); and (e) the facies analysis of the Ladinian involved in the fault-ass~iated structures is therefore quite important for the kinematic understanding of these structures. Thus, Ladinian strike-slip tectonics are strongly supported by several observations. Earlier, Anisian movements have been postulated by Brandner (1984), Doglioni (1984a), and C. Neri (pers. commun., 1987). Even Permian deformation was proposed by Pichler (1962). In this perspective therefore it can be concluded that the Late Ladinian displacements re-activated pre-existing weakness zones. En-echelon overthrusts and other structures associated with the Passo Feudo structure (Pisa et
platform (heteropic
Anisian pets.
Moena
commun.,
Val Gardena
dykes have been omitted
this section
be balanced.
could
only be reconstructed
Note the vertical (LP).
For
equivalent
Sandstones:
further (north
Formation
discussion
of the platform);
formation 1987):
in three
Livinallogo
see text. D-Ladinian
of Stava fault), Contrin
W-Scythian
Werfen
P-Permian
ignimbrites.
Formation: Several
from the cross section.
al., 1979; Bosellini et al., 1982; Castellarin et al., 1982a. b; Doglioni, 1982; 1984a, b; 1985; 1987) all suggest that the Middle Triassic deformation of the Dolomites is due to sinistral transpression across a N70 “E direction (Doglioni, 1984a; R. Brandner, pers. commun., 1984). This transpression coincides with rna~rn~ subsidence rates in the area, which in turn are reflected by the growth of thick carbonate platforms. Local transpressions of this type are understood within the context of a general transtensive environment (Bernoulli, 1985). Overall Mesozoic sinistral strike-slip tectonics have been postulated for the Southern Alps by Doglioni (1984a) because the main Mesosoic swells and basins have an en-echelon orientation with respect to the proposed N70’E transpressional orientation (e.g. the NNE trends reported by BoseIIini, 1965). What is the geodynamic significance of the Triassic strike-slip tectonics observed in the
297
The overall stratigraphic and structural setting is best illustrated by a N-S cross section, located just to the east of the N-S strike-slip faults. On this section (Fig. 4) we note Middle and Late Triassic carbonate platforms prograding in different directions, often oblique to the orientation of the cross section. A map showing the Ladinian platform-slope-basin relationships, strongly suggests strike-slip movements (Fig. 5) which had been proposed by Di Cobertaldo (1948). Strike-slip movements are widely confirmed by horizontal striations both dextral and sinistral on N-S striking faults. On E-W cross-sections flower structures are very common (Fig. 6). From the preceding discussions it may be concluded that displaced platform-basin margins are particularly useful markers to indicate strike-slip displacement. Of course, two-dimensional sections across flower structures cannot be properly balanced but the discordant juxtaposition of co-eval platform and basin sediments across strike-slip faults is very characteristic. Platform basin margins are typically irregular and often very articulated (i.e. lobes, tongues, emba~ents etc.) and therefore paleogeographic restorations across strike-slip
Dolor&es? Taking a much wider view we can see that Africa and Europe were separated by sinistral transform faults, e.g. the Newfoun~and-foresGibraltar fracture zone (i.e. see Dewey et al., 1973; Brandner, 1984; Masson and Miles, 1986; Ziegler, 1987). Thus we view the segment of the southern Alps as a link between the transform domain of the opening Atlantic Ocean and the subduction domain of the Triassic Paleotethys beneath the Eurasian continental crust (see Sengijr et al., 1984; Ziegler, 1987). The Raibl example The famous Pb/Zn ore deposit of Raibl (Brig0 and Omenetto, 1979) is located in the Eastern Alps near the point where the boundaries of Austria, Yugoslavia, and Italy meet (Fig. 1). Raibl is just to the south of two import~t Neogene Alpine dextral transpressive faults: the Fella-Sava line and the Gail line (i.e. the eastern segment of the Insubric lineament). In this area N-S trending sinistral strike-slip faults that are viewed as antithetic Riedel shears to the Fella-Sava line, cross the Raibl valley.
N
Cinque
k _ Fig. 4. N-S cross section of the eastern Raibl area showing Middle-Late directions (both southward and northw~d). Ignimbrites; P-Calcare in age); DP-Dolomia
de1 Predil; R-Rio
S
M. Guarda
Punte
Dh4-Dolomia
Me~fera
de1 Lago Formation;
I
Triassic platforms and basins prograding in different
(Ladinian); B-basinal
C-Comen
I km
Buchenstein Formation, Rio Freddo
Dolomite; Z+--Tor Formation (P, R, C, T, Camian
Principale (Late Camian to Norian). The slope of the Dolomia Metalhfera (DM) is oriented about N55 o W, i.e. at an angle to the cross section. Its defomration is illustrated on Fig. 5.
29X
to multiple ceivable
Early Carnian
Brigo,
interpretations.
(see Assereto 1973) that
For instance,
et al., 1968; Assereto
syn-sedimentary
could have disrupted
the platform
one must
that
remember
could
Late Triassic
also be interpreted
that case, additional
structural valley
fault planes,
margin;
faulted
are in
subvertical
striations
monocline.
that
fault. In
observations
a few N-S
(in by a
a map picture
in fact, show normal
tilted by the regional
faults
surface
as a strike-slip
order;
in the Raibl
basinal
margin)
fault, may well provide
and
normal
an oblique
this case, the platform-basin normal
it is con-
slowly
We conclude
that
we have to be cautious when calculating strike-slip displacements in the possible presence of normal faults that intersect complex basin-margin shapes. Applied to the Raibl mining district this means that a pronounced re-entrant could have modified the overall ESE-WNW platform-basin margin. Thus normal faults would simulate an apparent dextral movement in the eastern part of the re-entrant and a sinistral displacement in the other side (Fig. 5). Be this as it may, in the Raibl area sinistral Neogene (South Alpine trend) faults are associated with NO “-30 o E striking faults and probably dextral Paleogene (Dinaric trends) (NO ’ -40 o E) strike-slip faults that intersected the platform-basin margin. Even allowing for synsedimentary Triassic normal faults and a lobate platform margin, the platform-basin margins can still be used to assess approximate Tertiary strike2 km
slip displacements. Fig. 5. Speculative the Raibl
area
distribution platform
sketch
based
maps of the structural
on structural
of platform-basin developed
(black arrows).
facies.
A re-entrant
area
extension:
horizontal
during
displacements.
sinistral trends. provides
in the form the
Neogene,
strike-slip Note
and/or
normal
times the old zone of weakness tectonics
During
was probably
the Late Triassic
parent
evolution
and
how
an useful
main
faulting
tectonic
also produced
took
strike-slip
South place
the platform-basin reference
in the Raibl
Much later during
of a dextral the
present
was re-activated
for
Alpine along margin
a
Tectonics
of carbonate
platform
margins
in the
Dolomites
progradation
the Early Jurassic
faulting
of
the present
the Ladinian,
with an overall south-dipping
valley; during suffered
analysis
the ap-
Paleogene
during
Dinaric
fault.
Finally
deformation the old
fault
configuration
the reconstruction
of the
evolution.
faults must keep into account, as much as possible, the original platform shape. Furthermore, restorations that are based only on maps are subject
On
a map,
Dolomites
the
carbonate
are irregular
platforms
with many
curved,
of the elon-
gated and arcuate re-entrants and promontories (Bosellini, 1984). Carbonate platforms are typically composed of competent massive limestones and dolomites, while incompetent lithologies of well-bedded limestones, marls and shales are characteristic for the off-platform basins. This leads to the observation that, in general, platforms are more protected from the effects of compressional tectonics than the adjacent basins (Leonardi, 1967). Not surprisingly, platform slopes are then preferred positions for overthrust-related ramp
299
Fig. 6. Positive flower structure in the Ladinian carbonate platform of Raibl (Dolomia Metallifera) that is related to a N-S trending sinistral Neogene shear zone. Photograph taken of the western cliffs of the Cinque Punte mountain.
structures. Thus, clinoforms associated with prograding sequences (Bosellini, 1984) are being used as ramps for overthrusts (Doglioni, 1985). Schematically a platform-basin sequence may be deformed by three tectonic processes i.e. extension, strike-slip and compression. Figure 7 illustrates that both compression and extension permits construction of balanced cross sections and reconstructions. On the other hand strike-faults do
not allow for simple Z-D balancing. Instead, strike-slip tectonics can only be reconstructed if one allows for the third dimension. Note therefore, in the strike-slip diagram, (Fig. 7) that the platform margin has been omitted and that the basinal facies has no equivalent on the right side of the fault. Figure 7 is only schematic, but the strike-slip illustration applies particularly well to the Passo Feudo structure that is located along the
Fig. 7. Cartoons showing, in principle, how different types of deformation may affect a carbonate platfo~-b~in margin; normal faulting or thrusting produce restorable cross-sections; note that thrusting can follow pre-existing clinoforms; strike-slip displacements produce a cross section that typically cannot be balanced on two-dimensional cross sections. Note that on this diagram the distal wedge of the platform is missing and that basinal sediments are directly juxtaposed across the fault plane.
Latemar
3 km _--_~-
Fig. 8. Two examples
of tectonics
Feudo
structure
(north
thrust
tectonics:
oblique
Paleogene
structure
deforming
platform-basin
to the left). The Late Ladinian and lateral
(north
ramps
at the right)
may occur where
margins.
magmatism
at the platform
the structure
fault,
i.e. a sinistral
Triassic
transpressive
tectonics;
along
margins;
is further
explanations
Stava
A. Strike-slip occurred
this example
could explain
this example
complicated
could
by later
be applied
Neogene
The Passo
Feudo
and Raibl
placement
fine example
a few kilometers
of strike-tectonics
(Fig. 8A).
to faulting
has
been the subject of many recent papers, particularly some that were illustrated by seismic profiles (Harding and Lowell, 1979; Reading, 1980; 1982; Harding, 1985). In the Passo Feudo case, criteria indicating strike-slip tectonics include the distribution of basinal sediments with respect to the platform core, their vertical attitude and differing thicknesses of basinal sediments on either side of the fault, omission of platform segments on profiles and the subvertical attitude of the fault. Platform-basin relations offer useful regional tectonic insights and may suggest amounts of displacements particularly if the original shape of the platform can be inferred with confidence.
For
further
see text.
structive examples of strike-slip across carbonate platform-basin
of perhaps
to the Falzarego
tectonics.
fault. As previously stated, the Passo Feudo structure can only be explained by a strike-slip disThe relationship
the Passo
the shear zone in a later event. B. Thin-skinned
is the Ladinian
situations
are in-
tectonics cutting settings. Another
Costabella
platform
that has also been intersected by the Stava fault in the Dolor&es (Doglioni, 1984b). In the Falzarego area of the central Dolomites. W-vergent Dinaric (probably Paleogene in age) thrusts shortened the sedimentary cover (Doglioni, 1987). In that area the paleogeographic setting influences thrust planes: lateral and oblique ramps are developed along platform-basin margins (Fig. 8B) both in the hangingwall and in the footwall. We can consider a lateral ramp as a superficial strike-slip (tear) fault. In the Falzarego structure a WSW-vergent, N30” W trending overthrust placed a Camian platform (Lagazuoi) over another Camian platform (Sass0 di Stria). The overthrust continues into an oblique and lateral ramp at the southern
301
platform stance
margins
and
at a point
changes
into
were
can
the strike
a N90”-1OO”E
Falzarego
valley.
tectonics
overprinted
The
be observed
later
for in-
Acknowledgements
of the thrust
direction S-vergent
along
the
Neogene
Thanks
to A.W. Bally, A. Bosellini,
Trtimpy
and two anonymous
cal reading
this geometry.
text. Thanks
the useful
suggestions
Lallemant,
D. Bernoulli,
toration
of the paleogeography
forms and basins, sion
across strike-slip faults require analysis for an adequate res-
of the
Passo
of carbonate
as we indicated Feudo
and
plat-
with the discusRaibl
examples.
Platform-basin relations may be very useful to estimate the amount of displacement along strikeslip faults. In the two cases presented in this paper the main features indicative of strike-slip faulting are: (1) the subvertical dip of the fault, which cannot be explained normal fault;
in context of a thrust fault (2) the omission of significant
or a por-
tion of the platform on two-dimensional cross sections; (3) vertical dips in basinal sediments along the fault and their anomalous position with respect to the core of the platform. (4) The platform cores are offset. (5) Widely different thicknesses and facies on either sides of the fault that cannot be explained in terms of a normal growth fault. Normal faults may cut inclined platformslope margins and with inadequate outcrops suggest apparent horizontal displacements. It is noted that thin-skinned may be associated with oblique
thrust tectonics or lateral ramps
along platform-basin margins that are oriented at an angle of 0 “-70 ’ with respect to the main compressional axis. Finally, at least conceptually, it can be imagined that during the development of platformbasin margin complexes the syn-sedimentary response to strike-slip faulting may well lead to platform developments in transpressional settings (or push together, A.W. Bally, pers. commun., 1988) and the drowning of platforms and/or the formation small basins coinciding with pull-apart segments: these paleogeographic elements can invert their nature along the path of undulate strike-slip zones.
M. Harris,
A. Castellarin,
H.P. Laubscher,
M. Zerbato.
Italian
AvC
G.V. Dal L. Hardie,
D. Masetti,
F. Massari,
J. Platt, D. Rossi, F. Sabat
Supported
Minister0
for
H.G.
R. Goldhammer,
C. Neri, P. Omenetto, and
also to the following or discussions:
Piaz, M. Friedman, Reconstructions a three-dimensional
for the criti-
of the text. A.W. Bally also re-edited
the English Concluding remarks
L. Brigo, R.
referees
della
by a grant
Pubblica
from the
Istruzione
(40%
A. Bosellini). References Assereto,
R. and Brigo, L., 1973. La ricerca
zona di Raibl Friuli
geomineraria
nella
tra la Valle di Rio de1 Lago e la Valbruna.
Venezia
Giulia/CNR
convention,
unpublished
re-
port, pp. 1-14. Assereto,
R., Desio, A., Di Cobertaldo,
1968. Note
illustrative
Scala 1: 100.000, Poligrafica Bernoulli,
della
foglio
Ercolano,
D. and Passeri,
Carta
Geologica
14A Tarvisio.
Naples,
system.
workshop:
the
Serv. Geol.
history
In: Proceeding
Southern
alla
d’Ital.,
pp. l-70.
D., 1985. Geologic-tectonic
Mediterranean
L.D.,
d’Italia
of the Alpine-
of the Second
Segment.
European
EGT
Science
Foundation. Bosellini, A., 1965. Lineamenti durante
il Permo-Trias.
Tridentina, Bosellini,
strutturali Mem.
Stor.
Nat.
Venezia
15(3): l-72.
A., 1984. Progradation
forms: examples em Italy). Bosellini,
delle Alpi Meridionali
Mus.
Sedimentology,
A. and Rossi,
of the Dolomites,
geometries
from the Triassic
of carbonate
of the Dolomites
plat(North-
31: l-24.
D., 1974. Triassic
northern
carbonate
buildups
Italy. In: L.F. Laporte
(Editor),
Reefs in Time and Space. Spec. Publ. Sot. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral., Bosellini,
18: 209-233.
A., Castellarin,
F., Perri,
M.C.,
A., Doglioni,
Rossi,
E., 1982. Magmatismo In:
Castellarin,
Geologia
e tettonica
A. and
de1 Sudalpino
C., Guy,
P.L., Simboli, Vai,
F., Lucchini,
G. and Sommaviha,
nel Trias delle Dolomiti.
G.B.
(Editors),
Centro-Orientale.
Guida
alla
Guide Geol. Reg.,
Sot. Geol. Ital., pp. 189-210. Brandner,
R., 1984. Meeresspiegelschwankungen
in der
Trias
(Austria),
des NW-Tethys.
Jahrb.
P., 1979. The lead and zinc ores of the
Raibl (Cave de1 Predil-northern genic data. C.,
Italy) Zone: new metallo-
Verh. Geol. Bundesaust. Gaetani,
Paleogeografia Sudalpino.
Bundesaust.
126(4): 435-475.
Brigo, L. and Omenetto,
Brusca,
und Tektonic Geol.
M.,
Jadoul,
Ladino-Carnica
(Austria), F.
and e
Viel,
3: 241-247. G.,
metallogenesi
Mem. Sot. Geol. Ital., 22: 65-82.
1981. de1
Castellarin.
A.. Guy,
F. and
del Passo
di S. Nicolb
dintorni (Dolomiti).
In:
Selli, L., 1982a. e della
A. Castellarin,
Guida alla Geologia
and
de1 Sudalpino
Geologia
dei
Valle di Contrin
G.B.
Vai, (Editors),
Centro-OrientaIe.
Guide
Geol. Reg.. Sot. Geol. Ital., pp. 231-242. Castellarin,
A., Lucchini,
trusioni G.B.
E., 1982b.
di Predazzo
e dei Monzoni.
Vai (Editors),
Centro-Orient~e.
Note
Guida
Guide
alla
Geol.
R.. Simboli.
geologiche
sulle in-
In: A. Castellarin
Geologia Reg.,
and
Sot. Geol.
Ital.. pp.
Dolomites
ddimentologique
plate-formes Italiennes).
J.F.,
Pittman.
biogtnes
(Trias
des
Bonnin,
J.,
Ryan,
W.B.F.
and the evolution
D., 1948. I1 Giacimento
in Friuli
Geol. Congr..
(Italia).
London.
Mem.
and
of the Alpine
sys-
piombo-zincifero
di
iongo (Dolomiti Paleontol.,
presented
18th
Sess.
Int.
triassica
centrali).
nella Valle di Livinal-
Ann. Univ. Ferrara,
9, Sci. Geol.
C.,
1984a.
Tettonica
triassica
transpressiva
nelle
C., 1984b. Triassic (northern
diapiric
Italy).
structures
Eclogae
Geol.
in the central Helv..
77 (2):
C., 1985. The overthrusts
systems.
in the Dolomites:
ramp-flat
Centro-Orientale.
Italia).
Guida
Guide
alla Geo-
Geol.
D.G. and Miles, P.R.. 1986. Development potential
margins
of Mesozoic
of the North
H.,
Bozener
sedimentary
Atlantic.
1962.
C.,
1987.
Tectonics
of the
Italy). J. Struct.
positive
flower structures,
structural
inversion.
Dolomites
(Southern
Reg.,
and hydm-
basins
around
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geoi..
positive
and identification Bower structures,
Bull. Am. Assoc.
and
Pet. Geol.,
Boselhni.
plate tectonic provinces.
A.. Lucchini,
A. and
Lowell,
habitats,
J.D.,
1979. Structural
and hydrocarbon
des Siidteiles
urn Ttient
der
(Ober-Italien).
styles,
their
traps in petroleum
Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet]. Geol.. 63: 1016-1058.
F., Rossi, P.L.. Simboli,
Sommavilla,
magmatism
in the Southern
data in the
Dolomites.
E.. 1979. Alps.
Middle
I: a review
Riv. Ital.
Paleontol.
G..
Triassic
of general
Stratigr.,
X5:
1093-1110. H.G..
1980. Characteristics
slip fault
systems.
(Editors),
Sedimentation
Reading,
H.G..
In: P.F.
Yilmaz.
of the Mediterranean
Sedimental.,
London.
of strike-
H.G.
Reading
Mobile
Zones.
4: 2’7-42.
basins
and global
tectonics.
93: 321-350.
Y. and Sungurlu, Cimmerides:
0.. 1984. Tectonics
nature
and evolution
of Paleo-Tethys.
Robertson
Eastern
and
in Oblique-slip
termination
and A.H.F. the
and recognition Baflance
1982. Sedimentary
Sengtir, A.M.C.,
(Editors),
Mediterranean.
The Geological Spec.
of
In: J.E. Dixon Publ.
Evolution Geol.
Sot.
17.
Englewood-Cliffs.
of Structural
di Cembra-Val
Geology.
Prentice-Hall,
N.J.. 537 pp.
Venzo. G.A.. 1962. Geologia Alto Adige).
69 (4): 582-600. T.P. and
zur Tektonik
im Raum
Suppe, J., 1985. Principles
Geol.. 9 (2).
T.P., 1985. Seismic characteristics
of negative
BeitrLge
Porphyrplatte
Piss, G.. Castellarin,
of
Eciogae Geol. Hetv., 78 (2): 335-350.
Alps-Northern
Harding,
Maason,
the western
261-285.
Harding.
logia del Sudaipino
Proc. Geol. Assoc. London.
G. Geol.. 3, 46 (2): 47-60.
Dolomites
Doglioni.
~e~dionali,
and G.B. Vai (Editors),
Spec. Publ. Int. Assoc.
8: l-20.
Dolomiti.
Do&or&
G., 1982. I1 magmatismo (Alpi
Sot. Geol. Ital.. pp. 221-229.
Reading,
pp. 1..-149.
C., 1982. Tettonica
Doglioni,
dell ‘area di Predmo
Mitt. Geol. Ges. Wien, 55: 41-54.
Sci. Terre. 19: 299-379.
tem. Bull. Geol. Sot. Am., 84: 3137-3180. Di Cobertaldo,
Doghoni,
dei monti tra Isarco
2 vols., 981 pp.
F.. Rossi, P.L. and Simboti.
triassico
Pichler.
et paleostructurale
carbonatees
W.C..
1973. Plate tectonics
Doglioni,
Geologia
Rovereto,
70 (6): 721-729.
de quelque
Raibl
Lucchini.
carbon
de1 Sudalpino
21 I-220. Cros, P., 1974. Evolution
Dewey,
P.. 1967. Le Dolomiti.
e Piave. Manfrini,
In: A. Castellarin
F., Rossi. P.L.. Sartori.
G. and Sommavilla.
Leonardi,
deila regione dalla confluenza
d’Adige
al~altipi~o
di Lavaze
Val
(Trentinn
Mem. Mus. Stor. Nat. Venezia Tridentina.
14
(1): 7-228. Ziegler.
P.A.,
and Western
1987.
Evolution
Tethys.
of the Arctic-North
Atlantic
Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.. Mem.. 43.