Exchange coupling-induced uniaxial anisotropy in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films

Sci. Bull. DOI 10.1007/s11434-015-0962-1

www.scibull.com www.springer.com/scp

Article

Materials Science

Exchange coupling-induced uniaxial anisotropy in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films Liang Wu • Jing Ma • Ji Ma • Yujun Zhang Ya Gao • Qinghua Zhang • Ming Liu • Ce-Wen Nan

•

Received: 1 September 2015 / Revised: 14 October 2015 / Accepted: 17 November 2015 Ó Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Abstract Establishing a deeper understanding of the anisotropy in manganites is useful for tailoring their magnetic properties for device applications. Here we showed that ferromagnetic La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) thin films, epitaxially grown on SrTiO3 (STO) substrates, exhibited unexpected double-shifted magnetization curves originating from the competition between common biaxial and emergent uniaxial anisotropies. This emergent uniaxial anisotropy could be induced by exchange coupling between the ferromagnetic LSMO and an antiferromagnetic LSMO dead layer at the LSMO/STO interface, which could be manipulated by the degree of oxygen deficiency. Keywords La0.7Sr0.3MnO3  Dead layer  Magnetic anisotropy  Double-shifted magnetization

1 Introduction The fundamental physical properties of perovskite mixed valence manganites have attracted tremendous interest since the discovery of the colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) effect [1]. Significant progress has been achieved in

L. Wu  J. Ma (&)  J. Ma  Y. Zhang  Y. Gao  Q. Zhang  C.-W. Nan State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China e-mail: [email protected] M. Liu Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education and International Center for Dielectric Research, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

understanding the novel properties of these compounds from the perspective of interactions involving charge, spin, orbital, and lattice due to considerable theoretical and experimental efforts conducted in recent years. The further developments of giant magnetoresistance (GMR) and tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) have enriched spintronic science and technology. Thus, manganese perovskites are promising to meet the requirements of commercial applications in the field of spintronic devices such as the read/ write heads of magnetic hard-disk drives and magnetic random access memories (MRAMs) [2]. Among the manganese perovskites, Sr doped LaMnO3 has been most widely investigated as a promising electrode material due to its good current collecting ability and excellent electrocatalytic activity for fuel [3–5], high temperature oxygen sensor [6], and highly active nanocatalyst [7]. Particularly, it is also an optimal material for spintronic devices due to almost 100 % spin-polarization [3, 8] and a Curie temperature above room temperature. Many emergent phenomena have not been found in the bulk state, such as abnormal magnetic anisotropy [9, 10] and domain configuration control [11], but inherent within La1-xSrxMnO3 thin films due to the inevitable reconstruction of the charge, spin, orbital, and lattice states at the film-substrate interface [12, 13], which is thought to play an adverse role in device applications [14, 15]. Thus, to tailor the magnetic properties of epitaxial La1-xSrxMnO3 thin films, we need to seek a deeper understanding of the origin of substrate-induced anisotropies, which are very sensitive to a number of parameters such as the film strain imposed by the underlying substrate [11, 16], substrate miscut angles [17, 18], and dead layer at the film-substrate interface [9, 19]. Generally, a biaxial anisotropy is observed in the ferromagnetic (FM) La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) thin films

123

Sci. Bull.

epitaxially grown on SrTiO3 (STO) (001) substrates due to the isotropic in-plane mismatch strain [20]. In the present study, we reported interest magnetic anisotropies in such LSMO thin films on STO (001). In particular, unexpected double-shifted magnetization curves were observed in the LSMO thin films on STO (001) and it originated from the competition between common biaxial and emergent uniaxial magnetic anisotropies as described by Stoner–Wohlfarth (S–W) model. The uniaxial anisotropy in the LSMO films could be caused by an intrinsic antiferromagnetic (AFM) dead layer at the LSMO/STO interface by means of the exchange coupling effect [21], which could be affected by the oxygen vacancy concentration in LSMO thin films. This novel feature offers a deeper understanding of the magnetic anisotropy observed in LSMO films, as well as a potential method of tuning that anisotropy.

2 Materials and methods A series of 16 nm thick LSMO thin films were epitaxially grown on single-crystalline STO (001) substrates by the pulsed laser deposition (PLD, AdNaNo, China) method from a stoichiometric LSMO target, with a growth temperature of 800 °C, and an oxygen background pressure of 200 mTorr (1 Torr = 133.322 Pa). An excimer laser with a wavelength of 248 nm, repetition rate of 5 Hz, and an energy density of 2 J/cm2 was used. After film growth, the samples were cooled to room temperature at a rate of 20 °C/min in an oxygen environment equivalent to that employed during deposition. The magnetization reversal processes of the LSMO thin films were measured at room temperature by a typical transverse magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE, Durham NanoMOKE2, UK) configuration. The microstructure of LSMO film was carefully examined by the reciprocal space maps (RSM, high-resolution X-ray diffraction of PANalytical X’Pert MRD, the Netherland) and the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL2011, Japan).

3 Results 3.1 Magnetization measurement of LSMO thin films To study the magnetic anisotropy of the films, angulardependent in-plane hysteresis loops were measured as a function of the in-plane rotation angle a over the entire angular range. As the crystallographic directions STO [010] and STO [100] were identical, the angles a = 0° and 90° were defined corresponding to the STO [010] and STO [100] for simplification (the insets in Fig. 1). Generally, biaxial anisotropy is induced by the isotropic in-plane

123

tensile strain imposed by the cubic STO (001) lattice and expected to be observed in LSMO thin films deposited on STO (001). Interestingly, our LSMO thin films presented an emergent uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, as shown in Fig. 1a. Three representative magnetization versus applied magnetic field (M–H) hysteresis loops acquired at a = 90°, 45°, and 0° are shown in Fig. 1b–d, respectively. Figure 1b clearly demonstrated that an unexpected double-shifted magnetization curve appeared along a = 90°, which was completely different from the hysteresis loops acquired along a = 45° and 0°. 3.2 Micromagnetic modeling Such double-shifted magnetization curves have already been studied by micromagnetic modeling, experimentally observed in some other magnetic bilayers, such as Co/ NiMn, and explained from the perspective of phenomenological theory to be the result of competition between uniaxial magnetic anisotropy and biaxial magnetic anisotropy [22]. In order to understand the M–H hysteresis behavior observed in our LSMO thin films, the S–W model was used to simulate the M–H hysteresis loops of the films. By assuming a homogeneous magnetization in the ferromagnetic LSMO layer, the free-energy density f in the system with collinear uniaxial anisotropy (quadratic) and biaxial anisotropy (quartic) could be written as f ¼ Ms H cosðh  aÞ þ Ku sin2 h þ Kb sin2 h cos2 h;

ð1Þ

where Ms is the saturation magnetization, which is 250 emu/ cc (cc = cm3) at room temperature acquired from SQUID measurements (not shown here). Ku and Kb are the uniaxial anisotropy and biaxial anisotropy constants, obtained as 1.8 and 1.0 erg/cc, respectively, from a fitting of the analytical model to the experimental data in Fig. 1. h and a are the angles of the magnetization vector and the applied magnetic field making with the axis of the uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, and a is the same as defined in our experiment. According to the S–W model, a double-shifted magnetization curve appears only when the values of Ku and Kb meet a rigorous requirement of 5Kb [ Ku [ Kb [ 0 [22]. As shown in Fig. 1, the shapes of the magnetization curves obtained from the S–W model fitted well with the experiments over the entire angular range, except that the coercive field strengths (Hc) obtained were not always equal to those indicated by the experimental data. To validate this explanation further, the a-dependence of Hc was investigated (Fig. 2). While over a range of a from 30° to 90°, the measured values of Hc tended to agree with the results of the S–W model due to magnetic domain rotation, the large overestimation of Hc in the range from 0° to 30° might be caused by anisotropy dispersion or domain wall motion [23], which were not taken into account in the simple S–W model.

Sci. Bull.

Fig. 1 (Color online) a Measured polar figures of the normalized remanent magnetization (Mr/Ms) for the LSMO thin films. b–d Kerr magnetization curves measured (dots) and corresponding curves simulated according to the S–W model (black lines) along a = 90° (b), 45° (c), and 0° (d). The arrows in the insets indicate the direction of the applied magnetic fields

Measured Hc Calculated Hc

20

Hc (Oe)

15 10 5 0

0

10

20

30

40

50

α()

60

70

80

90

o

Fig. 2 (Color online) Angular dependence of Hc for the LSMO thin films

4 Discussion To obtain a deeper understanding of the nature of this uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, we examined the structural information carefully. Figure 3a–c shows the reciprocal

space maps around the (002), (013), and (103) STO reflections, respectively. The peaks corresponding to the films and to the substrate appeared for the same values of Qx, which illustrated that both films and substrate had the same in-plane parameter, and clearly revealed that the films were fully strained by the substrate. The films have been expected to be free from obvious structural defects, which was confirmed by HRTEM image given in Fig. 3d. The structural characterization revealed no observable difference in the strains along the [001] and [010] directions. Based on the literature [24], the presence of uniaxial anisotropy in the LSMO thin films could be due to several possible origins, such as the strain-induced uniaxial anisotropy in LSMO/NdGaO3 (NGO) owing to the nonequivalent strain imposed by the substrate, step-induced uniaxial anisotropy in LSMO/STO [17] owing to the formation of elongated structures along the step-edge direction, and the orthorhombic crystal structure induced in LSMO/(LaAlO3)0.3(SrAl0.5Ta0.5O3)0.7 (LSAT) [10]. However, based on the RSM and HRTEM results, the fully strained LSMO thin film has a tetragonal phase, and the strain is equal in the two in-plane directions. Besides, the easy and hard axes are always aligned with the STO [100]

123

Sci. Bull.

Fig. 3 (Color online) a–c Reciprocal space maps (RSM) measured around the (002), (013), and (103) STO reflections, respectively. d A typical and amplified HRTEM images for the La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/SrTiO3 (001) (LSMO/STO) system. The dashed line in (d) indicates the sharp LSMO/STO interface

and STO [010] directions and have no relation to the step direction [25]. All these results indicated that none of the above-reported explanations were applicable to our case. Thus, the most reasonable explanation was an exchange coupling-induced uniaxial anisotropy acting between the FM LSMO and an AFM LSMO dead layer at the LSMO/ STO interface. Interfacial dead layers of LSMO thin films have been studied with regard to a number of different substrates [26]. And the results displayed very different effects due to the different magnetic states of the dead layer, which could be tuned by a number of factors such as strain and oxygen deficiency [19]. An AFM dead layer with relatively large AFM anisotropy has been demonstrated for the LSMO/STO system [19], which induced an intrinsic exchange bias effect. More recently, even a spin glass dead layer has been detected in the LSMO/LaSrAlO4 (LSAO) system [9]. An AFM phase at the LSMO/STO interface has also been predicted from

123

first principles [27, 28] and detected in other study [29]. These studies indicated that the dead layer at the interface could be an A-type AFM with sufficiently low AFM anisotropy under a particular tensile strain and oxygen deficiency. When the spins in the FM layer rotated, the spins in the AFM layer could be dragged and rotated at the same time, which induced the uniaxial anisotropy by quenching the FM along the AFM easy axis [21]. Other FM/AFM bilayer systems also reported this effect [22]. It was not easy to exactly demarcate the AFM dead layer in our LSMO thin films by TEM due to the almost undifferentiated lattice structure between the interface dead layer and the above FM layer. However, it could verify our explanation indirectly that the AFM easy axis always had a certain relationship with the crystallographic direction [25]. If the uniaxial anisotropy was induced by the AFM dead layer, the magnetic states of LSMO could be strongly tuned according to the degree of oxygen deficiency, and the

Sci. Bull. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51332001 and 51402164) and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2014Z21010 and 2014Z01006). Conflict of interest of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict

References

Fig. 4 (Color online) Kerr magnetization curves of the annealed LSMO thin films measured along the SrTiO3 (STO) [100] (dots) and [010] directions (squares)

hysteresis behavior should then be tunable according to the degree of oxygen deficiency. To further verify our hypothesis, the sample was placed back in the PLD chamber and annealed at 800 °C in an oxygen background pressure of 200 Torr for 10 min and cooled to room temperature at a rate of 20 °C/min in the same oxygen environment to partially eliminate the oxygen deficiency. The film was then measured by MOKE under the same conditions as employed previously, and the typical results are shown in Fig. 4. As expected, the double-shifted magnetization curves disappeared along the STO [100] crystallographic direction, and the LSMO thin film became nearly isotropic, accompanied by some decrease in Hc along the STO [010] crystallographic direction, which was a significant feature exhibited in exchange coupling systems [21]. Therefore, our samples demonstrated that the magnetic anisotropy could be remarkably tuned according to the degree of oxygen deficiency and our hypothesis would be supported.

5 Conclusion In summary, we demonstrated that the unexpected doubleshifted magnetization curves exhibited in single-layer FM LSMO thin films epitaxially grown on STO substrates were the result of the presence of a novel uniaxial anisotropy. The uniaxial anisotropy was induced by exchange coupling between the FM LSMO and the AFM LSMO dead layer at the LSMO/STO interface, and it was evidenced by the observation that the magnetic anisotropy of LSMO could be manipulated by the degree of oxygen deficiency.

1. Jonker GH, Vansanten JH (1950) Ferromagnetic compounds of manganese with perovskite structure. Physica 16:337–349 2. Park JH, Vescovo E, Kim HJ et al (1998) Direct evidence for a half-metallic ferromagnet. Nature 392:794–796 3. Jun Z, Gang C, Kai W et al (2014) The performance of La0.6Sr1.4MnO4 layered perovskite electrode material for intermediate temperature symmetrical solid oxide fuel cells. J Power Sources 270:418–425 4. Jin C, Yang ZB, Zheng HH et al (2012) La0.6Sr1.4MnO4 layered perovskite anode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem Commun 14:75–77 5. Zhong YF, Chen P, Yang B et al (2015) Low-cost platinum-free counter electrode of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 perovskite for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 106:4 6. Liu YX, Ding Y, Gao HY et al (2012) La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 nanofibers for in situ, real-time, and stable high temperature oxygen sensing. RSC Adv 2:3872–3877 7. Liu YX, Dai HX, Deng JG et al (2013) Au/3DOM La0.6Sr0.4MnO3: highly active nanocatalysts for the oxidation of carbon monoxide and toluene. J Catal 305:146–153 8. Bowen M, Bibes M, Barthe´le´my A et al (2003) Nearly total spin polarization in La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 from tunneling experiments. Appl Phys Lett 82:233 9. Cui B, Song C, Wang GY et al (2013) Strain engineering induced interfacial self-assembly and intrinsic exchange bias in a manganite perovskite film. Sci Rep 3:2542 10. Boschker H, Mathews M, Brinks P et al (2011) Uniaxial contribution to the magnetic anisotropy of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 thin films induced by orthorhombic crystal structure. J Magn Magn Mater 323:2632–2638 11. Dho J, Kim YN, Hwang YS et al (2003) Strain-induced magnetic stripe domains in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 82:1434 12. Chakhalian J, Freeland JW, Habermeier HU et al (2007) Orbital reconstruction and covalent bonding at an oxide interface. Science 318:1114–1117 13. Dagotto E (2007) Physics—when oxides meet face to face. Science 318:1076–1077 14. Freeland JW, Gray KE, Ozyuzer L et al (2005) Full bulk spin polarization and intrinsic tunnel barriers at the surface of layered manganites. Nat Mater 4:62–67 15. Yamada H, Ogawa Y, Ishii Y et al (2004) Engineered interface of magnetic oxides. Science 305:646–648 16. Kwona C, Robsona MC, Kima KC et al (1997) Stress-induced effects in epitaxial (La0.7TSr0.3)MnO3 films. J Magn Magn Mater 172:229 17. Mathews M, Postma FM, Lodder JC et al (2005) Step-induced uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 thin films. Appl Phys Lett 87:242507 18. Perna P, Rodrigo C, Jime´nez E et al (2011) Magnetization reversal in half metallic La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 films grown onto vicinal surfaces. J Appl Phys 109:07B107

123

Sci. Bull. 19. Schumacher D, Steffen A, Voigt J et al (2013) Inducing exchange bias in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 thin films by strain and oxygen deficiency. Phys Rev B 88:144427 20. Suzuki Y, Hwang HY, Cheong SW et al (1998) Magnetic anisotropy of doped manganite thin films and crystals. J Appl Phys 83:7064–7066 21. Nogue´s J, Sort J, Langlais V et al (2005) Exchange bias in nanostructures. Phys Rep 422:65–117 22. Chang CR, Yang JS, Huang JCA et al (2001) Double shifted magnetization curves in magnetic bilayers. J Phys Chem Solids 62:1737–1748 23. Kim DY, Kim C, Kim CO et al (2006) Angular dependence of exchange bias and coercivity in polycrystalline CoFe/MnIr bilayers. J Magn Magn Mater 304:e56–e58 24. Boschker H, Mathews M, Houwman E et al (2009) Strong uniaxial in-plane magnetic anisotropy of (001)- and (011)-oriented

123

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 thin films on NdGaO3 substrates. Phys Rev B 79:214425 Solovyev I, Hamada N, Terakura K (1996) Crucial role of the lattice distortion in the magnetism of LaMnO3. Phys Rev Lett 76:4825–4828 Valencia S, Pena L, Konstantinovic Z et al (2014) Intrinsic antiferromagnetic/insulating phase at manganite surfaces and interfaces. J Phys Condes Matter 26:166001 Colizzi G, Filippetti A, Cossu F et al (2008) Interplay of strain and magnetism in La1-xSrxMnO3 from first principles. Phys Rev B 78:235122 Peng R, Xu HC, Xia M et al (2014) Tuning the dead-layer behavior of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3/SrTiO3 via interfacial engineering. Appl Phys Lett 104:081606 Luo WD, Pennycook SJ, Pantelides ST (2008) Magnetic ‘‘Dead’’ layer at a complex oxide interface. Phys Rev Lett 101:247204