- Email: [email protected]
Excision of the trapezium and interposition arthroplasty with gelfoam for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis
EXCISION OF THE TRAPEZIUM AND INTERPOSITION ARTHROPLASTY WITH GELFOAM FOR THE TREATMENT OF TRAPEZIOMETACARPAL OSTEOARTHRITIS I. NUSEM and D. R. GOODWIN From the Department of Orthopaedics A and Hand Surgery Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Excision of the trapezium with Gelfoam interposition was performed in 35 thumbs, 34 of which were evaluated after an average 5 years. Twenty-four patients had unilateral procedures. The follow-up examination included a standardized questionnaire and clinical and radiological examinations. Pain relief was achieved in all cases. The patients considered that 32 of their operated hands had improved function, while two had not improved. All patients were satisfied with the final postoperative result. Adduction of the thumb to the index finger, and opposition to the tip of the little finger was possible in all cases. Weakness, in comparison to the other thumb, of lateral pinch (71%; P=0.0001), tip pinch (74%; P=0.007), and grip strength (85%; P=0.006) were observed. The first web span was preserved in all hands. Calculation of the trapezial space ratio demonstrated only slight, insignificant shortening (7%; P=0.06) of the thumb ray. No significant correlations between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and grip strength were observed. We conclude that excision of the trapezium and Gelfoam interposition has no specific complications and is a reliable surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume, 2003) 28B: 3: 242–245
2000). Others have advocated the use of synthetic materials such as Gelfoam (Goldner and Clippinger, 1959; Dell and Muniz, 1987), Gore-Text, and polypropylene (Marlext) (Muermans and Coenen, 1998) to fill the ‘‘trapezial space’’. Several forms of Silicone implant arthroplasty are also available, which either replace the excised trapezium (Swanson, 1972), or resurface the base of the thumb metacarpal (Kessler 1973). Polyurethane implants (Tecoflext) (Sollerman et al., 1993), and total joint arthroplasty can also be used (de la Caffiniere, 1991). None of the large number of procedures is completely satisfactory. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study is to investigate whether excision of the trapezium and Gelfoam (Pharmacia and Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) interposition prevents proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal and improves thumb function.
INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint predominantly affects middle-aged women and is often bilateral. Most cases can be managed successfully by conservative means, but surgery is indicated in resistant cases (Armstrong et al., 1994). Numerous operative procedures have been described for the treatment of this condition. Simple excision of the trapezium is the classical treatment and provides good pain relief (Dhar et al., 1994; Gervis 1973; Iyer, 1981; Varley et al., 1994). However, it may be associated with subluxation and dislocation, or proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal which allows abutment between the base of the thumb metacarpal and the scaphoid or trapezoid (Conolly and Rath, 1993) and the development of degenerative changes at the pseudoarthrosis (Iyer, 1981). Theoretically shortening of the thumb ray may diminish thumb strength. The risk of these complications has led surgeons to interpose materials within the space created by removal of the trapezium, or create a suspensory ligament. These options include tendon interposition using a rolled-up slip of the flexor carpi radialis (Damen et al., 1997) or palmaris longus (Dell and Muniz 1987), palmar oblique ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) (Burton and Pellegrini, 1986), the creation of a suspension tendon sling (Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991), and insertion of porcine dermal collagen xenograft (Permacolt) (Belcher and Zic, 2001) or a costochondral allograft (Trumble et al.,
PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five interposition arthroplasties with Gelfoam were performed in 30 patients between July 1990 and October 1996. All patients had symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthtritis classified radiologically as Eaton stages 2–4 (Eaton and Littler, 1973). Twentynine of the 30 patients (34 procedures) attended for a follow-up examination at a mean of 5 (range, 4–10) years after surgery. All patients were examined by one of 242
243
TRAPEZIECTOMY WITH GELFOAM INTERPOSTION
the authors (IN), who had not been involved in their surgery. There were 22 women and seven men with a mean age at the time of surgery of 60 (range, 46–74) years. Five patients had undergone bilateral surgery. The dominant hand was operated in six of the unilateral cases. At follow-up all patients completed a standardized questionnaire, and were asked about their satisfaction with the operative procedure. Pain at follow-up was graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe (Table 1). Pain levels were compared with those before surgery, and the need for analgesic medications was also assessed. The ability to perform activities such as unscrew the lid of a jar, turn a key, button or unbutton a blouse was compared to that before surgery and was graded as satisfactory, mild improvement, no improvement and worse. The patients were also asked about the appearance of the operated hand compared to before surgery, and this was graded as better, not different or worse. The objective examination included evaluation of the operation site for sensory radial nerve dysfunction and ability to adduct the thumb to the index ray and oppose it to the tip of the little finger. The first web span was measured between the longitudinal axis of the thumb and index metacarpals. Lateral (key) pinch, tip pinch and grip strength were measured using Jamar Dynamometers (Preston, Clifton, NJ, USA). For these evaluations each patient was asked to perform each test three times with each hand, and the mean was calculated. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of both hands were obtained on seated patients, with the elbow flexed to 901, and the forearm fully pronated. The X-ray beam was focused 90 cms from the plate. These radiographs were used to calculate the trapezial space ratio for both the operated and non-operated thumbs. This was done by dividing the trapezial space height by the length of thumb proximal phalanx (Kadiyala et al., 1996). The radiographs were also inspected for osteolysis or cyst formation (indication of reactive synovitis) and the development of osteoarthritis between the distal pole of the scaphoid and the base of the thumb metacarpal. Surgical technique The trapezium is approached through a longitudinal incision on its radiopalmar aspect, protecting the sensory branch of the radial nerve. The capsule is opened longitudinally in the interval between the
Table 1—Pain level definition Type of pain None Mild Moderate Severe
Definition Pain with use, no restrictions Pain with use, restrictions/or rest pain Night pain
abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis. The trapezium is removed piecemeal. Moderate longitudinal traction is exerted on the thumb and its metacarpal is stabilized with two Kirschner wires, which are inserted in a criss-cross fashion from its base into the capitate and the scaphoid. The space created after removal of the trapezium is impacted with pieces of Gelfoam. The capsule is closed, and the hand is immobilized in a bulky dressing. At 3 weeks the Kirschner wires are removed, and active and passive motion of the thumb is allowed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Paired parametric data for patients who underwent unilateral surgery (first web span, lateral pinch, tip pinch, grip strength and trapezial space ratio) were compared using Student’s t-test. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) were used to analyse relationships between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch, tip pinch and grip strength.
RESULTS Complete pain relieve was achieved in 23 of the 34 operated hands. Seven had mild pain and four moderate pain. Nine of the 11 patients with persistent pain only experienced pain during activities, but the other two also had occasional rest pain. The patients reported significant pain reduction compared to the preoperative state for 29 of the 34 surgical procedures, while the other five reported only mild improvement. No patient reported pain worse than that before surgery. In 29 operated hands the patients had no need for analgesic medications, and in five mild analgesic medications were used occasionally. All patients were satisfied with the postoperative result. The ability of 29 operated hands to perform activities was markedly improved. In three it was moderately improved and in two there was no improvement. Seventeen patients considered the appearance of their operated hands had been improved, twelve reported no change, and five considered their appearance worse. No patient had any sensory radial nerve dysfunction, and all were able to adduct their thumb to the index finger and to oppose it to the tip of the little finger. The mean first web span for the operated hands was 711 (range, 50–1001), compared with 721 (range, 50– 1001) for the non-operated hands. The mean lateral (key) pinch for all operated hands was 4.1 (range, 2–8) kg. For the patients who had unilateral surgery this was 4.3 (range, 2–8) kg, compared with 6 (range, 3–8) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is significant (P=0.0001). The mean tip pinch of all the operated hands was 3.7 (range, 2–7) kg. For
244
the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 3.9 (range, 2–7) kg, compared with 5.2 (range, 3–8) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is also significant (P=0.0007). The mean grip strength calculated for the all the operated hands was 16.7 (range, 4–32) kg, and for the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 18 (range, 11–32) kg, compared with 21.5 (range, 11–36) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is also significant (P=0.006). The mean trapezial space ratio of all operated hands was 0.41 (range, 0.34–0.46), and for the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 0.43 (range, 0.34–0.48) compared with 0.46 (range, 0.4–0.54) for the non-operated hands: this difference is not significant (P=0.06). No signs of osteolysis, cyst formation or osteoarthritis between the distal pole of the scaphoid and the base of the thumb metacarpal were observed. Analysis of the relationship between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and grip strength did not show any significant correlations (lateral pinch: r=0.373, P=0.4; tip pinch: r=0.409, P=0.3; grip strength: r=0.395, P=0.4).
DISCUSSION A wide spectrum of techniques have been advised to preserve the trapezial height, and prevent proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal, scapho-metacarpal abutment and the development of osteoarthritis of the pseudoarthrosis after trapeziectomy. A number of materials have been interposed within the trapezial space, but some cause major complications. Silicone implants may break, fragment and cause synovitis, leading to osteolysis and bone destruction of the thumb metacarpal (Kessler, 1973; Swanson, 1972). Osteolytic changes and synovitis have also been observed around Gore-Text implants, though Marlext is well tolerated (Muermans and Coenen, 1998). Polyurethane implants (Tecoflext) have high rates of dislocation and subluxation (Sollerman et al., 1993), and porcine dermal collagen xenograft (Permacolt) produces a foreign body reaction (Belcher and Zic, 2001). Costochondral allografts do not preserve the trapezial height, and are associated with fractures and complete graft resorption (Trumble et al., 2000). The use of Gelfoam as an interposition material to fill the ‘‘trapezial space’’ was not associated with complications such as breakage, synovitis, osteolysis or bone destruction in our study. Furthermore its use does not require accurate bone osteotomies or stabilization techniques which are required with some other implants. Interposition arthroplasty using a rolled-up tendon segment, with or without palmar oblique ligament reconstruction, requires harvesting of a donor tendon
THE JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY VOL. 28B No. 3 JUNE 2003
from the forearm or wrist (Burton and Pellegrini, 1986; Damen et al., 1997; Dell and Muniz 1987). This adds potential morbidity due to scars, pain, tendon rupture and neuroma formation. Suspension sling arthroplasties (Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991) share the same problems, and, if inserted to tight, may also cause tendonitis. In this study pain relief was achieved in all cases, although 11 of the 34 thumbs were not completely pain free. Twenty-seven of the 29 patients considered their ability to perform activities improved, and all 29 were satisfied with the final postoperative result. All patients retained good thumb movement, and no adduction contractures of the trapeziometacarpal joint developed. We found lateral pinch (29%), tip pinch (26%), and grip strength (15%) were weaker in the operated hands than the non-operated ones, which is in agreement with other studies (Dhar et al., 1994; Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991; Varley et al., 1994). However, the results of other studies, which reported slight increases in strength after trapeziectomy, suggest that the weakness pre-existed the surgery and was not caused by it (Davis et al., 1997; Downing and Davis, 2001; Lins et al., 1996). Downing and Davis (2001) reported decreases of 50– 59% in the trapezial space ratio after trapeziectomy alone, or with tendon interposition or LRTI. Burton and Pellegrini (1986) also found a decrease of 50% in the trapezial height after trapeziectomy and LRTI, while Lins et al. (1996) reported a decrease of only 30% after the same procedure. Although the trapezial space ratio was slightly reduced (7%) in our patients, this was not statistically significant. Thus trapeziectomy with interposition with Gelfoam is successful in restoring and maintaining the length of the thumb ray and, in the short term at least, prevents complications associated with proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal. We believe that the use of Kirschner-wires to hold the thumb metacarpal away from the distal pole of the scaphoid for 3 weeks (Davis et al., 1997; Downing et al., 2001), and the formation of dense fibrous scar within the Gelfoam (Pospiech et al., 1995) allows a firm pseudoarthrosis to form. Although it is widely considered that preservation of the trapezial height, and therefore the thumb length, preserves thumb strength, we, like others, could not find any significant correlation between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and thumb strength (Downing and Davis, 2001).
References Armstrong AL, Hunter, JB, Davis TRC (1994). The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19B: 340–341. Belcher HJCR, Zic R (2001). Adverse effect of porcine collagen interposition after trapeziectomy. A comparative study. Journal of Hand Surgery, 26B: 159–164.
TRAPEZIECTOMY WITH GELFOAM INTERPOSTION Burton RI, Pellegrini Jr VD (1986). Surgical management of the basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Part 2. Ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 4A: 324–332. Conolly WB, Rath S (1993). Revision procedures for complications of surgery for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery, 18B: 533–539. Damen A, Van Der Lei B, Robinson PH (1997). Bilateral osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint treated by bilateral tendon interposition arhroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 22B: 96–99. Davis TRC, Brady O, Barton NJ, Lunn PG, Burke FD (1997). Trapeziectomy alone, with tendon interposition or with ligament reconstruction? Journal of Hand Surgery, 22B: 690–694. de la Caffiniere JY (1991). Resultats a long terme de la prothese totale trapezometacarpienne dans la rhizarthrose. Rev Chirurg Orthoped, 77: 312– 321. Dell PC, Muniz RB (1987). Interposition arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal joint for osteoarthritis. Clinical Ortopaedics and Related Research, 220: 27–34. Dhar S, Gray ICM, Jones WA, et al. (1994). Simple excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19B: 485–488. Downing ND, Davis TRC (2001). Trapezial space height after trapeziectomy: Mechanism of formation and benefits. Journal of Hand Surgery, 26A: 862–868. Eaton RG, Littler JW (1973). Ligament reconstruction of the painful thumb metacarpal joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55A: 1655–1666. Gervis WH (1973). A review of excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint after twenty-five years. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55B: 56–57. Goldner JL, Clippinger FW (1959). Excision of the greater multangular bone as an adjunct to mobilization of the thumb. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 41A: 609–625. Iyer KM (1981). The results of excision of the trapezium. The Hand, 13: 246– 250. Kadiyala RK, Gelberman RH, Kwon B (1996). Basal joint arthrosis. Radiographic assessment of the trapezial space before and after ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 21B: 177–181. Kessler I (1973). Silicone arthroplasty of the trapezio-metacarpal joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55B: 285–291.
245 Kleinman WB, Eckenrode JF (1991). Tendon suspension sling arthroplasty for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 16A: 983– 991. Lins RE, Gelberman RH, McKeown L et al. (1996). Basal joint arthritis: trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 21A: 202–209. Muermans S, Coenen L (1998). Interpositional arthroplasty with Gore-Tex, Marlex or tendon for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. A retrospective comparative study. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23B: 64–68. Pospiech J, Pajonk F, Stolke D (1995). Epidural scar tissue formation after spinal surgery: an experimental study. European Spine Journal, 4: 213– 219. Sigfusson R, Lundborg G (1991). Abductor pollicis longus tendon arthroplasty for treatment of arthrosis in the first carpometacarpal joint. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstruction and Hand Surgery, 25: 73–77. Sollerman C, Hasselgren G, Westermark J et al. (1993). Replacement of the os trapezium by polyurethrane implants. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstruction and Hand Surgery, 27: 217–221. Swanson AB (1972). Disabling arthritis at the base of the thumb. Treatment by resection of the trapezium and flexible (Silicone) implant arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 54A: 456–471. Trumble TE, Rafijah D, Gilbert M et al. (2000). Thumb trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: partial trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and interposition costochondral allograft. Journal of Hand Surgery, 25A: 61–76. Varley GW, Calvey J, Hunter JB et al. (1994). Excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 76B: 964–968.
Received: 28 March 2002 Accepted: 3 January 2003 Dr. Nusem Iulian, 10 Rosewood Street, Bardon, Brisbane QLD 4065, Australia. Tel.: +61-733694263; fax: +61-7-33694263; E-mail: [email protected]. r 2003 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00009-3/jhsb.2003.0909, available online at http://www.science direct.com
Excision of the trapezium with Gelfoam interposition was performed in 35 thumbs, 34 of which were evaluated after an average 5 years. Twenty-four patients had unilateral procedures. The follow-up examination included a standardized questionnaire and clinical and radiological examinations. Pain relief was achieved in all cases. The patients considered that 32 of their operated hands had improved function, while two had not improved. All patients were satisfied with the final postoperative result. Adduction of the thumb to the index finger, and opposition to the tip of the little finger was possible in all cases. Weakness, in comparison to the other thumb, of lateral pinch (71%; P=0.0001), tip pinch (74%; P=0.007), and grip strength (85%; P=0.006) were observed. The first web span was preserved in all hands. Calculation of the trapezial space ratio demonstrated only slight, insignificant shortening (7%; P=0.06) of the thumb ray. No significant correlations between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and grip strength were observed. We conclude that excision of the trapezium and Gelfoam interposition has no specific complications and is a reliable surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume, 2003) 28B: 3: 242–245
2000). Others have advocated the use of synthetic materials such as Gelfoam (Goldner and Clippinger, 1959; Dell and Muniz, 1987), Gore-Text, and polypropylene (Marlext) (Muermans and Coenen, 1998) to fill the ‘‘trapezial space’’. Several forms of Silicone implant arthroplasty are also available, which either replace the excised trapezium (Swanson, 1972), or resurface the base of the thumb metacarpal (Kessler 1973). Polyurethane implants (Tecoflext) (Sollerman et al., 1993), and total joint arthroplasty can also be used (de la Caffiniere, 1991). None of the large number of procedures is completely satisfactory. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study is to investigate whether excision of the trapezium and Gelfoam (Pharmacia and Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) interposition prevents proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal and improves thumb function.
INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint predominantly affects middle-aged women and is often bilateral. Most cases can be managed successfully by conservative means, but surgery is indicated in resistant cases (Armstrong et al., 1994). Numerous operative procedures have been described for the treatment of this condition. Simple excision of the trapezium is the classical treatment and provides good pain relief (Dhar et al., 1994; Gervis 1973; Iyer, 1981; Varley et al., 1994). However, it may be associated with subluxation and dislocation, or proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal which allows abutment between the base of the thumb metacarpal and the scaphoid or trapezoid (Conolly and Rath, 1993) and the development of degenerative changes at the pseudoarthrosis (Iyer, 1981). Theoretically shortening of the thumb ray may diminish thumb strength. The risk of these complications has led surgeons to interpose materials within the space created by removal of the trapezium, or create a suspensory ligament. These options include tendon interposition using a rolled-up slip of the flexor carpi radialis (Damen et al., 1997) or palmaris longus (Dell and Muniz 1987), palmar oblique ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) (Burton and Pellegrini, 1986), the creation of a suspension tendon sling (Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991), and insertion of porcine dermal collagen xenograft (Permacolt) (Belcher and Zic, 2001) or a costochondral allograft (Trumble et al.,
PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five interposition arthroplasties with Gelfoam were performed in 30 patients between July 1990 and October 1996. All patients had symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthtritis classified radiologically as Eaton stages 2–4 (Eaton and Littler, 1973). Twentynine of the 30 patients (34 procedures) attended for a follow-up examination at a mean of 5 (range, 4–10) years after surgery. All patients were examined by one of 242
243
TRAPEZIECTOMY WITH GELFOAM INTERPOSTION
the authors (IN), who had not been involved in their surgery. There were 22 women and seven men with a mean age at the time of surgery of 60 (range, 46–74) years. Five patients had undergone bilateral surgery. The dominant hand was operated in six of the unilateral cases. At follow-up all patients completed a standardized questionnaire, and were asked about their satisfaction with the operative procedure. Pain at follow-up was graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe (Table 1). Pain levels were compared with those before surgery, and the need for analgesic medications was also assessed. The ability to perform activities such as unscrew the lid of a jar, turn a key, button or unbutton a blouse was compared to that before surgery and was graded as satisfactory, mild improvement, no improvement and worse. The patients were also asked about the appearance of the operated hand compared to before surgery, and this was graded as better, not different or worse. The objective examination included evaluation of the operation site for sensory radial nerve dysfunction and ability to adduct the thumb to the index ray and oppose it to the tip of the little finger. The first web span was measured between the longitudinal axis of the thumb and index metacarpals. Lateral (key) pinch, tip pinch and grip strength were measured using Jamar Dynamometers (Preston, Clifton, NJ, USA). For these evaluations each patient was asked to perform each test three times with each hand, and the mean was calculated. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of both hands were obtained on seated patients, with the elbow flexed to 901, and the forearm fully pronated. The X-ray beam was focused 90 cms from the plate. These radiographs were used to calculate the trapezial space ratio for both the operated and non-operated thumbs. This was done by dividing the trapezial space height by the length of thumb proximal phalanx (Kadiyala et al., 1996). The radiographs were also inspected for osteolysis or cyst formation (indication of reactive synovitis) and the development of osteoarthritis between the distal pole of the scaphoid and the base of the thumb metacarpal. Surgical technique The trapezium is approached through a longitudinal incision on its radiopalmar aspect, protecting the sensory branch of the radial nerve. The capsule is opened longitudinally in the interval between the
Table 1—Pain level definition Type of pain None Mild Moderate Severe
Definition Pain with use, no restrictions Pain with use, restrictions/or rest pain Night pain
abductor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis brevis. The trapezium is removed piecemeal. Moderate longitudinal traction is exerted on the thumb and its metacarpal is stabilized with two Kirschner wires, which are inserted in a criss-cross fashion from its base into the capitate and the scaphoid. The space created after removal of the trapezium is impacted with pieces of Gelfoam. The capsule is closed, and the hand is immobilized in a bulky dressing. At 3 weeks the Kirschner wires are removed, and active and passive motion of the thumb is allowed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Paired parametric data for patients who underwent unilateral surgery (first web span, lateral pinch, tip pinch, grip strength and trapezial space ratio) were compared using Student’s t-test. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) were used to analyse relationships between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch, tip pinch and grip strength.
RESULTS Complete pain relieve was achieved in 23 of the 34 operated hands. Seven had mild pain and four moderate pain. Nine of the 11 patients with persistent pain only experienced pain during activities, but the other two also had occasional rest pain. The patients reported significant pain reduction compared to the preoperative state for 29 of the 34 surgical procedures, while the other five reported only mild improvement. No patient reported pain worse than that before surgery. In 29 operated hands the patients had no need for analgesic medications, and in five mild analgesic medications were used occasionally. All patients were satisfied with the postoperative result. The ability of 29 operated hands to perform activities was markedly improved. In three it was moderately improved and in two there was no improvement. Seventeen patients considered the appearance of their operated hands had been improved, twelve reported no change, and five considered their appearance worse. No patient had any sensory radial nerve dysfunction, and all were able to adduct their thumb to the index finger and to oppose it to the tip of the little finger. The mean first web span for the operated hands was 711 (range, 50–1001), compared with 721 (range, 50– 1001) for the non-operated hands. The mean lateral (key) pinch for all operated hands was 4.1 (range, 2–8) kg. For the patients who had unilateral surgery this was 4.3 (range, 2–8) kg, compared with 6 (range, 3–8) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is significant (P=0.0001). The mean tip pinch of all the operated hands was 3.7 (range, 2–7) kg. For
244
the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 3.9 (range, 2–7) kg, compared with 5.2 (range, 3–8) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is also significant (P=0.0007). The mean grip strength calculated for the all the operated hands was 16.7 (range, 4–32) kg, and for the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 18 (range, 11–32) kg, compared with 21.5 (range, 11–36) kg for the non-operated hands: this difference is also significant (P=0.006). The mean trapezial space ratio of all operated hands was 0.41 (range, 0.34–0.46), and for the patients who had the operation performed on one hand this was 0.43 (range, 0.34–0.48) compared with 0.46 (range, 0.4–0.54) for the non-operated hands: this difference is not significant (P=0.06). No signs of osteolysis, cyst formation or osteoarthritis between the distal pole of the scaphoid and the base of the thumb metacarpal were observed. Analysis of the relationship between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and lateral pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and grip strength did not show any significant correlations (lateral pinch: r=0.373, P=0.4; tip pinch: r=0.409, P=0.3; grip strength: r=0.395, P=0.4).
DISCUSSION A wide spectrum of techniques have been advised to preserve the trapezial height, and prevent proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal, scapho-metacarpal abutment and the development of osteoarthritis of the pseudoarthrosis after trapeziectomy. A number of materials have been interposed within the trapezial space, but some cause major complications. Silicone implants may break, fragment and cause synovitis, leading to osteolysis and bone destruction of the thumb metacarpal (Kessler, 1973; Swanson, 1972). Osteolytic changes and synovitis have also been observed around Gore-Text implants, though Marlext is well tolerated (Muermans and Coenen, 1998). Polyurethane implants (Tecoflext) have high rates of dislocation and subluxation (Sollerman et al., 1993), and porcine dermal collagen xenograft (Permacolt) produces a foreign body reaction (Belcher and Zic, 2001). Costochondral allografts do not preserve the trapezial height, and are associated with fractures and complete graft resorption (Trumble et al., 2000). The use of Gelfoam as an interposition material to fill the ‘‘trapezial space’’ was not associated with complications such as breakage, synovitis, osteolysis or bone destruction in our study. Furthermore its use does not require accurate bone osteotomies or stabilization techniques which are required with some other implants. Interposition arthroplasty using a rolled-up tendon segment, with or without palmar oblique ligament reconstruction, requires harvesting of a donor tendon
THE JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY VOL. 28B No. 3 JUNE 2003
from the forearm or wrist (Burton and Pellegrini, 1986; Damen et al., 1997; Dell and Muniz 1987). This adds potential morbidity due to scars, pain, tendon rupture and neuroma formation. Suspension sling arthroplasties (Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991) share the same problems, and, if inserted to tight, may also cause tendonitis. In this study pain relief was achieved in all cases, although 11 of the 34 thumbs were not completely pain free. Twenty-seven of the 29 patients considered their ability to perform activities improved, and all 29 were satisfied with the final postoperative result. All patients retained good thumb movement, and no adduction contractures of the trapeziometacarpal joint developed. We found lateral pinch (29%), tip pinch (26%), and grip strength (15%) were weaker in the operated hands than the non-operated ones, which is in agreement with other studies (Dhar et al., 1994; Kleinman and Eckenrode, 1991; Sigfusson and Lundborg, 1991; Varley et al., 1994). However, the results of other studies, which reported slight increases in strength after trapeziectomy, suggest that the weakness pre-existed the surgery and was not caused by it (Davis et al., 1997; Downing and Davis, 2001; Lins et al., 1996). Downing and Davis (2001) reported decreases of 50– 59% in the trapezial space ratio after trapeziectomy alone, or with tendon interposition or LRTI. Burton and Pellegrini (1986) also found a decrease of 50% in the trapezial height after trapeziectomy and LRTI, while Lins et al. (1996) reported a decrease of only 30% after the same procedure. Although the trapezial space ratio was slightly reduced (7%) in our patients, this was not statistically significant. Thus trapeziectomy with interposition with Gelfoam is successful in restoring and maintaining the length of the thumb ray and, in the short term at least, prevents complications associated with proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal. We believe that the use of Kirschner-wires to hold the thumb metacarpal away from the distal pole of the scaphoid for 3 weeks (Davis et al., 1997; Downing et al., 2001), and the formation of dense fibrous scar within the Gelfoam (Pospiech et al., 1995) allows a firm pseudoarthrosis to form. Although it is widely considered that preservation of the trapezial height, and therefore the thumb length, preserves thumb strength, we, like others, could not find any significant correlation between the postoperative trapezial space ratio and thumb strength (Downing and Davis, 2001).
References Armstrong AL, Hunter, JB, Davis TRC (1994). The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19B: 340–341. Belcher HJCR, Zic R (2001). Adverse effect of porcine collagen interposition after trapeziectomy. A comparative study. Journal of Hand Surgery, 26B: 159–164.
TRAPEZIECTOMY WITH GELFOAM INTERPOSTION Burton RI, Pellegrini Jr VD (1986). Surgical management of the basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Part 2. Ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 4A: 324–332. Conolly WB, Rath S (1993). Revision procedures for complications of surgery for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery, 18B: 533–539. Damen A, Van Der Lei B, Robinson PH (1997). Bilateral osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint treated by bilateral tendon interposition arhroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 22B: 96–99. Davis TRC, Brady O, Barton NJ, Lunn PG, Burke FD (1997). Trapeziectomy alone, with tendon interposition or with ligament reconstruction? Journal of Hand Surgery, 22B: 690–694. de la Caffiniere JY (1991). Resultats a long terme de la prothese totale trapezometacarpienne dans la rhizarthrose. Rev Chirurg Orthoped, 77: 312– 321. Dell PC, Muniz RB (1987). Interposition arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal joint for osteoarthritis. Clinical Ortopaedics and Related Research, 220: 27–34. Dhar S, Gray ICM, Jones WA, et al. (1994). Simple excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19B: 485–488. Downing ND, Davis TRC (2001). Trapezial space height after trapeziectomy: Mechanism of formation and benefits. Journal of Hand Surgery, 26A: 862–868. Eaton RG, Littler JW (1973). Ligament reconstruction of the painful thumb metacarpal joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55A: 1655–1666. Gervis WH (1973). A review of excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint after twenty-five years. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55B: 56–57. Goldner JL, Clippinger FW (1959). Excision of the greater multangular bone as an adjunct to mobilization of the thumb. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 41A: 609–625. Iyer KM (1981). The results of excision of the trapezium. The Hand, 13: 246– 250. Kadiyala RK, Gelberman RH, Kwon B (1996). Basal joint arthrosis. Radiographic assessment of the trapezial space before and after ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 21B: 177–181. Kessler I (1973). Silicone arthroplasty of the trapezio-metacarpal joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 55B: 285–291.
245 Kleinman WB, Eckenrode JF (1991). Tendon suspension sling arthroplasty for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 16A: 983– 991. Lins RE, Gelberman RH, McKeown L et al. (1996). Basal joint arthritis: trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty. Journal of Hand Surgery, 21A: 202–209. Muermans S, Coenen L (1998). Interpositional arthroplasty with Gore-Tex, Marlex or tendon for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. A retrospective comparative study. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23B: 64–68. Pospiech J, Pajonk F, Stolke D (1995). Epidural scar tissue formation after spinal surgery: an experimental study. European Spine Journal, 4: 213– 219. Sigfusson R, Lundborg G (1991). Abductor pollicis longus tendon arthroplasty for treatment of arthrosis in the first carpometacarpal joint. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstruction and Hand Surgery, 25: 73–77. Sollerman C, Hasselgren G, Westermark J et al. (1993). Replacement of the os trapezium by polyurethrane implants. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstruction and Hand Surgery, 27: 217–221. Swanson AB (1972). Disabling arthritis at the base of the thumb. Treatment by resection of the trapezium and flexible (Silicone) implant arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 54A: 456–471. Trumble TE, Rafijah D, Gilbert M et al. (2000). Thumb trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: partial trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and interposition costochondral allograft. Journal of Hand Surgery, 25A: 61–76. Varley GW, Calvey J, Hunter JB et al. (1994). Excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 76B: 964–968.
Received: 28 March 2002 Accepted: 3 January 2003 Dr. Nusem Iulian, 10 Rosewood Street, Bardon, Brisbane QLD 4065, Australia. Tel.: +61-733694263; fax: +61-7-33694263; E-mail: [email protected]. r 2003 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0266-7681(03)00009-3/jhsb.2003.0909, available online at http://www.science direct.com