Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Nuclear Medicine and Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nucmedbio
Excitatory glutamate transporter EAAC1 as an important transporter of N-(2-[ 18F]fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamate in oncology PET imaging Caihua Tang a,c,1, Qiyong Pan a,1, Siyuan Gao c, Aixia Sun c, Fuhua Wen c, Ganghua Tang b,c,⁎ a
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China Nanfang PET Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Medical Radiopharmaceuticals Translational Application, Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
b c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 16 October 2019 Received in revised form 24 January 2020 Accepted 9 February 2020 Available online xxxx Keywords: N-(2-[18F]fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamate Tumor imaging Glutamate transporter Excitatory amino acid carrier 1
a b s t r a c t Introduction: We have reported that N-(2-[18F]fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamate ([18F]FPGLU) was a potential amino acid tracer for tumor imaging with positron emission tomography (PET). In this study, the relationship between glutamate transporter excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1) expression and [18F]FPGLU uptake in rat C6 glioma cell lines and human SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma cell lines was investigated. Methods: The uptake of [18F]FPGLU was assessed in ATRA-treated and untreated C6 cell lines, and also in EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells and SPC-A-1(NT) control cells. PET imaging of [18F]FPGLU was performed on the SPC-A-1 and SPC-A-1 (shRNA)-bearing mice models. Results: The uptake of [18F]FPGLU in C6 cells increased significantly after induced by ATRA for 24, 48, and 72 h, which was closely related to expression of EAAC1 in C6 cells (R2 = 0.939). Compared with the SPC-A-1(NT) control cells, the uptake of [18F]FPGLU on EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells significantly decreased to 64.0%. Moreover, the uptake of [18F]FPGLU in EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) xenografts was significantly lower than that in SPC-A-1 xenografts, with tumor/muscle ratios of 3.01 vs. 1.67 at 60 min post-injection of [18F]FPGLU. Conclusion: The transport mechanism of [18F]FPGLU in glioma C6 and lung adenocarcinoma SPC-A-1 cell lines mainly involves in glutamate transporter EAAC1. EAAC1 is an important transporter of N-(2-[ 18F] fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamate in oncologic PET imaging. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
1. Introduction As the most commonly used positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for tumor diagnosis, 2-[ 18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) also has certain false negative and false positive results [1]. It has been reported that [ 18F]FDG negative tumors may use a different metabolic pathway called glutaminolysis [2,3]. Glutamine and glutamate play key roles in the adapted intermediary metabolism of tumors [4,5]. Several 18F-labeled glutamic acid and 18F-labeled glutamine have been used for metabolic PET imaging of tumor in humans [6,7]. High uptake of these amino acid tracers in tumor cells is likely related to the increased expression of amino acid transporters. For example, the upregulated system ASC, especially ASCT2 might contributed to the uptake of 18 F-labeled (2S,4R)-4-[18F]fluoro-L-glutamine [8], and 4-[18F]fluoro-Lglutamic acid (BAY 85–8050) transport involved in Na +-dependent − XAG and Na +-independent XC− systems with XC− possibly playing a ⁎ Corresponding author at: Nanfang PET Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. E-mail address:
[email protected] (G. Tang). 1 These authors contributed equally to this work. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.02.003 0969-8051/© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
more dominant role, but both of them showed defluorination in vivo [9]. 18F-labeled (4S)-4-(3-[ 18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (BAY 949392), another derivative of glutamic acid, whose transport was due mostly to upregulation of system XC−, a potential biomarker for tumor oxidative stress, can be useful for detecting system XC− activity in vivo and is considered to be a potential tracer for tumor imaging [10]. Our recently developed novel N- 18F-labeled glutamic acid, N-(218 [ F] fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamate ([18F]FPGLU), seemed to be a potential amino acid PET tracer for tumor metabolic imaging, with high tumor-to-background contrast in several tumor-bearing mice models [11,12]. Glutamate transport system includes Na +-dependent excit− atory glutamate transporter XAG system and Na +-independent gluta− mate transporter XC system. Preliminary studies showed that [ 18F] FPGLU was primarily transported through Na +-dependent high− affinity glutamate transporter system XAG [11], but the accurate trans− port mechanism is unknown. XAG system includes five members, such as EAAC1, GLT-1, GLAST, EAAT4 and EAAT5, they are also the SLC1 family – SLC1A1 (EAAC1), SLC1A2 (GLT1) and SLC1A3 (GLAST). As an im− portant member of XAG system, excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1), also called excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3), localizes to the post-synaptic structure of neurons and surrounding glial cells
56
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
as regulator of excitatory neurotransmission, and also exists in peripheral tissues, perhaps as metabolic regulators [13]. The expression of EAAC1 was known to be regulated by several mechanisms that modify carrier abundance on the plasma membranes and was markedly induced by all trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) in rat C6 glioma cells, which led to strikingly stimulate amino acid influx [14]. However, EAAC1 transporter may be a potential biomarker for tumor molecular imaging. It has not been reported so far. This study investigated the relationship between EAAC1 expression and [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in C6 rat glioma cell lines and SPC-A-1 human lung adenocarcinoma. The uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU was assessed in ATRA-treated and untreated C6 cell lines, and also in shRNA-mediated EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1 cells and the non-targeted (NT) control cells in vitro. Further prospective researches of PET imaging of tumorbearing mice models with C6, SPC-A-1 and EAAC1 knock-down SPCA-1(shRNA) xenografts were performed to reveal the correlation between the uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU and the expression of EAAC1. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. General information All reagents, unless otherwise specified, were of analytical grade and commercially available. All chemicals obtained commercially were used without further purification. Inveon small-animal PET/computed tomography (CT) scanner was purchased from Siemens (Germany).
monitored the mRNA and protein expression levels of EAAC1 in ATRA treated C6 and non-treated C6 cells.
2.5. Generation of shRNA-mediated EAAC1 knock-down cells The method of generation of shRNA-mediated EAAC1 knock-down cells was similar to the literature [17]. SPC-A-1 human lung adenocarcinoma cells were used for shRNA-mediated EAAC1 knock-down experiment. SPC-A-1 cells were transduced with lentivirus encoding EAAC1targeted short hairpin RNAs (shRNA). shRNA sequences were selected from human EAAC1 mRNA NM_004170 and the shRNA fragments were cloned in a lentivirus vector pGLV3 plasmid with the sequence 5′-GCATTACCACAGGAGTCTTGG-3′. A non-specific targeting (NT) shRNA for control was cloned in the same lentivirus plasmid backbone. Lentiviral packaging was performed with trans-lentiviral packaging mix in 293T cells according to the manufacturer's instructions. SPC-A-1 cells were plated on 6-well plates at 2 × 10 5 cells per well. After 24 h, medium was aspirated and replaced with 100 μL of virus-containing solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Cells were selected with puromycin and monitored for green fluorescence protein (GFP) expression. The EAAC1 mRNA expression level was monitored by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The EAAC1 protein expression level was quantized by western blotting.
2.6. qRT-PCR for the expression of EAAC1 2.2. Synthesis of [18F]FPGLU The synthesis of [ 18F]FPGLU from 4-nitrophenyl-2-[ 18F] fluoropropionate ([ 18F]NFP) via a two-step reaction sequence has been described in detail by the earlier paper [11,12,15]. 2.3. Cell culture and animal models The C6 rat glioma cells, SPC-A-1 human lung adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from Shanghai Institute of Cellular Biology of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in culture flasks containing DMEM medium (for C6 cells) or RPMI 1640 medium (for SPC-A-1) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/ streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. 24 h before the experiments in vitro, C6 cell lines or SPC-A-1 cell lines were trypsinized and 2 × 105 cells per well were seeded into 24well plates. All animal experimental studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee (IACUU) of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (approval No. [2013]A-173). All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering, to reduce the number of animals used, and to use alternatives to in vivo techniques, if available. The nude mice were obtained from Laboratory Animal Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). The C6, SPC-A-1 and EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) tumor models were made using previously described methods [11,16]. Tumor cells (2–5 × 10 6) were injected subcutaneously and allowed to grow for 1 to 3 weeks. When the tumor reached 6–10 mm (diameter) micro PET/ CT scans were done. 2.4. C6 induced by ATRA The rat glioma C6 cells were treated by all trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) 12 h after the passage. Culture medium was substituted with fresh medium (containing DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS) in the absence or in the present of ATRA at a concentration of 10 μM from a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO according to the literature [14]. After the treatment of ATRA for 24, 48 and 72 h, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blotting were used to
Relative expression levels of EAAC1 mRNA in C6 and SPC-A-1 cells were calculated using the fluorescence quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) (Stratagene Mx3000P Real time PCR, Agilent). Total cellular RNA was isolated with the Rneasy mini Kit (TAKARA). 1 μg of RNA was synthesized to cDNA in a 20 μL reaction system with reverse transcriptase buffer, RT Enzyme Mix and primer MIX (Bestar qPCR RT kit, DBI). Conditions for reverse transcription were 5 min at 65 °C, 5 min on ice, then 60 min at 37 °C and 10 min at 98 °C. Oligodeoxynucleotide primers of EAAC1 gene for PCR amplification was 5′-AGTTCAGCAACACTGCCTGT-3′ (forward) and 5′GTTGCACCAACGGGTA ACA C-3′ (reverse). PCR was programmed as follows: 2 min at 94 °C, 20 s at 94 °C, 20 s at 58 °C, then 20 s at 72 °C, for 40 cycles. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an initial control and each sample was amplified in triplicate. The relative expression of EAAC1 mRNA compared with GAPDH was calculated by comparative threshold method (2−ΔΔCt).
2.7. Western blotting for EAAC1 Cells were lysed in a detergent-containing buffer with protease inhibitors for 20 min at 4 °C. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a reference protein. After solubilization, cell lysates was collected and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were transferred into new tubes, quantification of proteins was performed with Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo) and aliquots of 25 μg were loaded on a 10% gel for SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). The membranes with EAAC1 or GAPDH were departed at the middle position, and were blocked and incubated with deferent antibody, respectively. Non-specific binding sites were blocked with an incubation in Tris-buffer saline containing 5% of bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. Then the blots were exposed to EAAC1 antibody (rabbit monoclonal antiserum, 1:1000, Abcam) or anti-GAPDH rabbit monoclonal antibody (1:3000, Abcam) diluted in blocking solution for at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the blots were exposed for 1 h at room temperature to goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP diluted 1:5000 in blocking solution.
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
2.8. Cellular uptake of [18F]FPGLU Cells were plated in 24-well plates (2 × 10 5 cells/well) and uptake studies were performed at 24 h after the passage. The cellular uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU studies was similar to the methods described previously [16]. The medium was aspirated and the cells were washed 3 times with 1 mL warm PBS. [ 18F]FPGLU was dissolved in PBS solution and was added to each well (74–111 KBq/0.2 mL/well). After incubated with [ 18F]FPGLU at 37 °C for 10 min, the radioactive medium was removed and the cells were washed 3 times with ice-cold PBS. Then, the cells were dissolved in 0.5 mL of 1 N NaOH and the activity was measured by γ counter (GC-1200, USTC Chuangxin Co. Ltd. Zonkia Branch, China). The cell lysates (25 μL) was used for determination of protein concentration by BCA protein assay. The uptake data are based on the amount of activity added to each well and the total amount of protein in each well. Each experiment was done in triplicate, averaged and was repeated 5 times on different days. The uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU was assessed on the ATRA-treated or untreated C6 cells, and on EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells or SPC-A-1(NT) control cells. The relative uptake ratios were calculated compared to the control cells. 2.9. Small-animal PET-CT imaging Small-animal PET-CT imaging studies with tumor-bearing mice were carried out using the Inveon small-animal PET/CT scanner (Siemens). 3.7–7.4 MBq of [ 18F]FPGLU were injected intravenously in conscious animals via the tail vein. The mice were anesthetized with 5% chloral hydrate solution (6 mL/kg) and were kept warm throughout
57
the procedure. Imaging started with a low-dose CT scan, immediately followed by a PET scan. PET images were acquired at 30, 60, 90, 120 min post-injection. For a comparative study, mice were kept fasting for 4 h and were anesthetized with 5% chloral hydrate solution (6 mL/ kg) and imaged with [ 18F]FDG (3.7 MBq) at 60 min after intravenous injection. The images were reconstructed by two-dimensional orderedsubsets expectation maximum (OSEM). For each small-animal PET scan, ROIs were drawn over the tumor and muscle of the thigh on decay-corrected whole-body coronal images using Inveon Research Workplace 4.1 software. The quantification was performed according the methods described previously [16]. Radioactivity concentration within a tumor or other tissue was converted to MBq/g and then divided by the administered activity to obtain an imaging ROI-derived percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g). Then, the tumor/muscle (T/M) and tumor/brain (T/B) uptake ratios were calculated, respectively. 2.10. Immunohistochemistry Expression of EAAC1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded rat brain tissues and C6 xenograft samples. Normal rat brain tissues and C6 glioma tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight at room temperature. Tissues were then dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 3-μm sections. After antigen retrieval, tissue sections were subject to immunohistochemical incubated with antibodies against EAAC1 (Abcam), DAB was stained before mounted onto microscope slides. Tissues were analyzed with a Nikon E800M microscope.
Fig. 1. The expression of EAAC1 and the uptake of [18F]FPGLU in ATRA-treated and untreated C6 cell lines. (A) Relative expression of EAAC1 mRNA in ATRA-treated C6 glioma cells. (B) EAAC1 protein expression in ATRA-treated C6 cells. (C) Relative uptake of [18F]FPGLU in ATRA-treated C6 cells. (D) Scatter plot display correlations between the relative mRNA expression of EAAC1 and the relative uptake of [18F]FPGLU in ATRA treated C6 cells.
58
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
2.11. Statistical analyses Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc.), for Windows (Microsoft). Student t-test was used to assess differences in the magnitudes of samples from two measurements. A P values of b0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significant. A scatter plot was drawn with the relative mRNA expression and the relative uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU in C6 cells treated with ATRA for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h. Spearman correlation analysis and a linear regression analysis was performed between them.
western blotting results also showed that EAAC1 protein expression in ATRA-treated C6 cells was increased gradually (Fig. 1B). Corresponding with the high EAAC1 expression in ATRA-treated C6 cells, [ 18F]FPGLU uptake was significantly increased to 1.47 ± 0.11, 2.14 ± 0.29, 2.12 ± 0.16 times in C6 cells treated by ATRA for 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively (Fig. 1C). There was a high correlation between the relative EAAC1 mRNA expression and the relative [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in ATRA treated C6 cells (R 2 = 0.939, Fig. 1D). To summarize, EAAC1 expression was markedly induced by ATRA in C6 cell lines. As a result, there was more [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in ATRA-treated C6 cell lines which has more EAAC1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels.
3. Results 3.2. PET imaging on C6 glioma-bearing mice 3.1. EAAC1 expression and [18F]FPGLU uptake in C6 cells induced by ATRA The EAAC1 mRNA relative expression levels in ATRA-treated C6 cells assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) are shown by Fig. 1A. Compared with the untreated C6 cells, the EAAC1 mRNA relative expression level in ATRA-treated C6 cells treated with ATRA at 10 μM for 24, 48 and 72 h was increased to 1.72 ± 0.11, 3.22 ± 0.22, 4.00 ± 0.21 times, respectively (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, the
Small-animal PET-CT scan was performed on C6 glioma-bearing nude mice models 1 h post-injection of [ 18F]FPGLU. PET-CT fusion imaging of the mice models demonstrated that [ 18F]FPGLU could intensely accumulate in C6 glioma (Fig. 2A). The average uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU in the tumor, brain and muscle were 2.30 ± 0.18% ID/g, 1.28 ± 0.10% ID/g and 0.81 ± 0.05% ID/g, respectively. However, the average uptake of [ 18F]FDG in the tumor, brain and muscle were 5.96 ± 0.75% ID/g,
Fig. 2. PET-CT imaging of [18F]FPGLU on C6 glioma-bearing mice models, and the immunohistochemistry staining of EAAC1 on C6 glioma or normal rat brain tissues. (A) The transaxial and coronal micro PET-CT fusion images of C6 glioma-bearing mice at 1 h post-injection of [18F]FPGLU or [18F]FDG (the red arrows indicate the tumors). (B) Tumor/Brain and Tumor/Muscle relative uptake ratios of [18F]FPGLU and [18F]FDG in C6 glioma at 1 h post-injection of radiotracers. (C) Immunohistochemistry staining of EAAC1 on normal rat brain tissue, C6 glioma. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62 Table 1 Radioactivity accumulation and relative uptake ratios derived of C6 glioma bearing nude mice at 60 min post-injection of [18F]FPGLU or [18F]FDG.
Tumor Brain Muscle T/B T/M
[18F]FPGLU
[18F]FDG
2.30 1.28 0.81 1.80 2.84
5.96 4.73 1.09 1.26 5.47
± ± ± ± ±
0.18 0.10 0.05 0.18 0.21
± ± ± ± ±
0.75 0.31 0.10 0.14 0.72
Note: Uptake data is expressed as average % ID/g (mean ± SD). n = 3 per group.
4.73 ± 0.31% ID/g and 1.09 ± 0.10% ID/g at 1 h post-injection of [ 18F] FDG, respectively (Table 1). The tumor/brain uptake ratio of [ 18F]FPGLU on C6 glioma-bearing mice was higher than that of [ 18F]FDG at 1 h post-injection of radiotracers (1.80 VS. 1.26, n = 3, P b 0.05, Fig. 2B). However, the tumor/muscle uptake ratio of [ 18F]FPGLU in C6 glioma-bearing mice was lower than that of [ 18F]FDG (2.84 VS. 5.47, n = 3, P b 0.05). Immunohistochemistry showed that widely diffuse EAAC1 transporter staining was shown in C6 glioma, however there was minimal EAAC1 staining in normal rat brain write matter tissue (Fig. 2C). 3.3. EAAC1 expression and [18F]FPGLU uptake in EAAC1 knock-down SPCA-1 human lung adenocarcinoma cells The influence of EAAC1 expression on [18F]FPGLU uptake was specifically investigated using RNA interference-mediated EAAC1 knockdown SPC-A-1 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Lentivirally delivered shRNA significantly reduced EAAC1 mRNA expression in SPC-A-1 (shRNA) cells, as compared to the non-targeted (NT) shRNA control cells (SPC-A-1(NT) cells), EAAC1 shRNA reduced EAAC1 mRNA expression by 72% in SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells (P b 0.01) (Fig. 3A). At the protein expression level, EAAC1 shRNA significantly decreased EAAC1 expression in SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells by 59.6% (P b 0.01) (Fig. 3B). Knockdown of EAAC1 expression was associated with a significantly lower [ 18F]FPGLU uptake by 36% in SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells (P b 0.05) (Fig. 3C). These results demonstrate that EAAC1 is an important mediator of uptake [ 18F]FPGLU in SPC-A-1 in vitro. 3.4. PET imaging on EAAC1 knock-down lung adenocarcinoma-bearing mice Small-animal PET-CT scan using [18F]FPGLU was performed on SPCA-1 human lung adenocarcinoma and EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1 (shRNA)-bearing nude mice models (n = 3 per group). PET and CT fusion images of [ 18F]FPGLU in SPC-A-1 and SPC-A-1(shRNA) tumorbearing nude mice models were shown in Fig. 4. The tumors were
59
clearly visible with high contrast to the contralateral background (muscle) within SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma animal models and the uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU in SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than that in EAAC1 knock-down ones. Regions of interest (ROIs) from the whole tumors on the coronal images were measured so that the accumulation of the radioactivity in the small-animal PET scans could be quantified. The uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU between the SPCA-1 and EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) lung adenocarcinoma were 2.86 ± 0.24% ID/g VS. 1.85 ± 0.13% ID/g (P b 0.05), 3.12 ± 0.36% ID/g VS. 2.05 ± 0.11% ID/g (P b 0.05), 3.05 ± 0.19% ID/g VS. 2.01 ± 0.15% ID/g (P b 0.05) and 2.95 ± 0.16% ID/g VS. 1.92 ± 0.08% ID/g (P b 0.05) at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min post-injection of [ 18F]FPGLU respectively (Fig. 5A and B). The tumor/muscle ratios of [18F]FPGLU in SPC-A1-bearing models were higher than that in EAAC1 knock-down ones during the 2 h protocol. The tumor/muscle ratio in the EAAC1 knockdown SPC-A-1(shRNA) lung adenocarcinoma was 1.67 at 60 min postinjection, which was significantly lower than that in SPC-A-1 ones (3.01) (P b .05), and the tumor/brain ratio between the SPC-A-1-bearing models and the EAAC1 knock-down ones reached 2.04 VS. 1.35 (P b .05) at 90 min post-injection (Fig. 5C and D). These findings confirmed the potential importance of EAAC1 as a mediator of [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma. 4. Discussion Malignant tumor cells highly accumulate amino acids and their close analogues due to increased expressing levels of amino acid transporters in the tumor cells [18,19]. Adaptations of amino acid transport systems in cancer cells can offer opportunities to provide novel diagnostic and − therapeutic targets [20–22]. The Na+-dependent XAG system is an important transport system for anionic amino acids [23]. EAAC1 is an glutamate transporter which localizes in partial peripheral tissues such as lung, muscle and kidney proximal tubules S3 segments to facilitate uptake of glutamate, which is involved into glutamine synthesis and followed by its release into the blood [24]. Moreover, because it can also transport cysteine, EAAC1 is believed to be important for the synthesis of intracellular glutathione and subsequent protection from oxidative stress [25]. Mature astrocytes are generally believed to be EAAC1-negative, but astroglial tumor cells, such as C6 rat glioma cells and several human glioma cell models express the EAAC1 transporter [26]. Widely diffuse EAAC1 transporter staining in C6 glioma and minimal EAAC1 staining in normal rat brain white matter tissue in our study also confirmed this phenomenon. Moreover, EAAC1 was positive on the human PC-3 prostate tumor cells [27]. So, EAAC1 transporter may be a potential biomarker for tumor molecular imaging. Additional biochemical studies suggested that the expression of EAAC1 markedly induced by ATRA in C6 glioma cells, especially in C6
Fig. 3. Endogenous EAAC1 expression and [18F]FPGLU uptake in SPC-A-1(shRNA) and control cells. (A) EAAC1 mRNA expression monitored by qPT-PCR (B) EAAC1 protein expression monitored by western blotting. (C) Uptake of [18F]FPGLU in SPC-A-1(shRNA) and SPC-A-1(NT) cells.
60
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
Fig. 4. PET-CT imaging of [18F]FPGLU on SPC-A-1 or EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) lung adenocarcinoma-bearing nude mice models. Fusion images of PET and CT of mice models with SPC-A-1 and SPC-A-1(shRNA) lung adenocarcinoma. Images obtained with [18F]FPGLU at 60 min and 120 min after intravenous injection (the red arrows indicate tumors). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
cells cultured with 0.1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) [14]. The results of our experiments demonstrated that EAAC1 also markedly induced by ATRA in C6 glioma cells cultured with 10% FBS. Furthermore, the EAAC1 expression was correlated with the uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU in C6 glioma cells. Expression levels of EAAC1 in ATRA-treated and untreated rat glioma C6 cells cultured significantly varied, which was positively correlated with the [ 18F]FPGLU uptake between them. Corresponding with the high EAAC1 mRNA expression in ATRA-treated C6 cells, [ 18F] FPGLU uptake was significantly increased. On the contrary, compared with non-targeted control cells, expression level of EAAC1 obviously decreased in EAAC1 knock-down SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells, and [ 18F]FPGLU uptake was strongly suppressed in vitro. Furthermore, changes in EAAC1 expression have a significant impact on [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma PET imaging. Obviously, these results suggest that EAAC1, as an important mediator of glutamate transport across cell membranes, is an important transporter of [ 18F]FPGLU in C6 glioma and SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma. Although there was a high correlation between the relative EAAC1 mRNA expression and the relative [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in ATRA treated C6 cells (R 2 = 0.939, Fig. 1D). The EAAC1 mRNA level increased until 72 h after ATRA-treatment, but the uptake of [ 18F]FPGLU didn't increase from 48 h. The possible reason is that EAAC1 activity and expression are highly regulated by intracellular signaling pathways, EAAC1 is expressed in cells, and the carrier abundance on the plasma membrane is regulated by several mechanisms [14], and only the EAAC1 located on the cell membrane may participate in the transport of [ 18F]FPGLU, which will be confirmed by further experiments. Nonetheless, there are likely additional factors that facilitate [ 18F] FPGLU uptake and retention within cells. Despite robust knock-down of EAAC1 expression in SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells, approximately 59.6% suppression of EAAC1 protein level lowered [ 18F]FPGLU uptake only by 36% in SPC-A-1(shRNA) cells. Radiotracer accumulation within tumor cells may reflect both transporter activity across the cellular
membrane and metabolism of the tracer within the cells. The persistent accumulation of [ 18F]FPGLU in the tumor cells might relate to residual − EAAC1 activity within the cell membrane or activity of other XAG transporters, such as GLT-1 or GLAST. Of course, additional studies are required to clearly define all the components that mediate [ 18F]FPGLU uptake in tumors. The results of this study demonstrated that an important mechanism of [ 18F]FPGLU uptake associated with EAAC1 expression in tumor, which suggested that [ 18F]FPGLU PET imaging could be used to diagnose tumors with high EAAC1 expression or to select tumors for using EAAC1-based novel therapeutic strategies. 5. Conclusion This study is the first report of a relationship between [ 18F]FPGLU uptake and EAAC1 expression in C6 glioma and SPC-A-1 lung adenocarcinoma. The results demonstrate that EAAC1 is an important transporter of [18F]FPGLU in tumor cells and may be a novel hallmark of tumor glutamate metabolism PET imaging. Furthermore, these data will provide researchers a more clear understanding that [ 18F]FPGLU PET can be optimally used in the field of oncology and motivate additional efforts to perform on the mechanism of [18F]FPGLU transport. Acknowledgements We thank Wenwen Li and Qingqiang Tu for their excellent technical support in this work. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81701723, 91949121, 81571704), the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2016B090920087), Science and Technology Planning Project Foundation of Guangzhou (Nos. 201604020169, 201510010145), and Nanfang Hospital Foundation of Southern Medical University.
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
61
Fig. 5. The uptake data (%ID/g) and the uptake ratios of [18F]FPGLU in SPC-A-1 (A, C) or SPC-A-1(shRNA) (B, D) bearing mice models. (A, B) The uptake of [18F]FPGLU (%ID/g) in the tumor, brain and muscle in SPC-A-1 or SPC-A-1(shRNA)-bearing mice models at different time point after injection of [18F]FPGLU. (C, D) The uptake ratios (tumor to brain (T/B) and tumor to muscle (T/M)) in SPC-A-1 or SPC-A-1(shRNA)-bearing mice models at different time point after injection of [18F]FPGLU.
References [1] Fletcher JW, Djubegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 2008;49:480–508. [2] DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli S, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:19345–50. [3] Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell 2012;21:297–308. [4] Shanware NP, Mullen AR, DeBerardinis RJ, Abraham RT. Glutamine: pleiotropic roles in tumor growth and stress resistance. J Mol Med 2011;89:229–36. [5] Rajagopalan KN, Deberardinis RJ. Role of glutamine in cancer: therapeutic and imaging implications. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1005–8. [6] Venneti S, Dunphy MP, Zhang H, Pitter KL, Zanzonico P, Campos C, et al. Glutaminebased PET imaging facilitates enhanced metabolic evaluation of gliomas in vivo. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:274ra17. [7] Baek S, Mueller A, Lim YS, Lee HC, Lee YJ, Gong G. (4S)-4-(3-18F-fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate for imaging of XC− transporter activity in hepatocellular carcinoma using PET: preclinical and exploratory clinical studies. J Nucl Med 2013;54:117–23. [8] Ploessl K, Wang LM, Lieberman BP, Qu WC, Kung HF. Comparative evaluation of [18F] labeled glutamic acid and glutamine as tumor metabolic imaging agents. J Nucl Med 2012;53:1616–24. [9] Krasikova RN, Kuznetsova OF, Fedorova OS, Belokon YN, Maleev VI, Mu L, et al. 4-[18F]fluoroglutamic acid (BAY 85-8050), a new amino acid radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors: synthesis and in vitro characterization. J Med Chem 2011; 54:406–10.
[10] Koglin N, Mueller A, Berndt M, Schmitt-Willich H, ToschiL, Stephens AW, et al. Specific PET imaging of xC- transporter activity using a 18F-labeled glutamate derivative reveals a dominant pathway in tumor metabolism. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17: 6000–11. [11] Hu KZ, Du K, Tang GH, Yao SB, Wang HL, Liang X, et al. Radiosynthesis and biological evaluation of N-[18F]labeled glutamic acid as a tumor metabolic imaging tracer. PLoS One 2014;9 [e93262(1-9)]. [12] Sun AX, Liu SY, Tang XL, Nie DH, Tang GH, Zhang ZW, et al. Simple and rapid radiosynthesis of N-18F-labeled glutamic acid as a hepatocellular carcinoma PET tracer. Nucl Med Biol 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio. 2017.02.003. [13] Bailey CG, Ryan RM, Thoeng A, Rasko JE. Loss-of-function mutations in the glutamate transporter SLC1A1 cause human dicarboxylic aminoaciduria. J Clin Invest 2011; 121:446–53. [14] Bianchi MG, Gazzola GC, Tognazzi L, Bussolati O. C6 glioma cells differentiated by retinoic acid overexpress the glutamate transporter excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1). Neurosci 2008;151:1042–52. [15] Huang S, Li HS, Han YJ, Fu LL, Ren YY, Zhang Y, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18Flabeled peptide for gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor imaging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5635269. [16] Tang CH, Tang GH, Gao SY, Liu SY, Wen FH, Yao BG, et al. Radiosynthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of N-(2-[18F] fluoropropionyl)-L-glutamine as a PET tracer for tumor imaging. Oncotarget 2016;7:34100–11. [17] Youland RS, Kitange GJ, Peterson TE, Pafundi DH, Ramiscal JA, Pokorny JL, et al. The role of LAT1 in 18F-DOPA uptake in malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2013;111:11–8. [18] Kobayashi K, Ohnishi A, Promsuk J, Shimizu S, Kanai Y, Shiokawa Y, et al. Enhanced tumor growth elicited by L-type amino acid transporter 1 in human malignant glioma cells. Neurosurgery 2008;62:493–503.
62
C. Tang et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 84–85 (2020) 55–62
[19] Li R, Younes M, Frolov A, Wheeler TM, Scardino P, Ohori M, et al. Expression of neutral amino acid transporter ASCT2 in human prostate. Anticancer Res 2003;23: 3413–8. [20] Bhutia YD, Babu E, Ramachandran S, Ganapathy V. Amino acid transporters in cancer and their relevance to “glutamine addiction”: novel targets for the design of a new class of anticancer drugs. Cancer Res 2015;75:1782–8. [21] Dang CV, Hamaker M, Sun P, Le A, Gao P. Therapeutic targeting of cancer cell metabolism. J Mol Med 2011;89:205–12. [22] Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine addiction: a new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 2010;35:427–33. [23] Kanai Y, Clemencon B, Simonin A, Leuenberger M, Lochner M, Weisstanner M, et al. The SLC1 high-affinity glutamate and neutral amino acid transporter family. Mol Aspects Med 2013;34:108–20.
[24] Massimiliano G, Bardelli D, Chiu M, Bussolati O. Changes in the expression of the glutamate transporter EAAT3/EAAC1 in health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71: 2001–15. [25] Aoyama K, Nakaki T. Glutathione in cellular redox homeostasis: association with the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1). Molecules 2015;20:8742–58. [26] Palos TP, Ramachandran B, Boado R, Howard BD. Rat C6 and human astrocytic tumor cells express a neuronal type of glutamate transporter. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1996;37:297–303. [27] Pissimissis N, Papageorgiou E, lembessis P, Armakolas A, Koutsilieris M. The glutamatergic system expression in human PC-3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Anticancer Res 2009;29:371–8.