secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris

secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris

Accepted Manuscript Excretory/secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris Lucienne Tritten, Mifong Tam, Mireille Vargas, Arm...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 59 Views

Accepted Manuscript Excretory/secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris Lucienne Tritten, Mifong Tam, Mireille Vargas, Armando Jardim, Mary M. Stevenson, Jennifer Keiser, Timothy G. Geary PII:

S0014-4894(17)30079-6

DOI:

10.1016/j.exppara.2017.05.003

Reference:

YEXPR 7407

To appear in:

Experimental Parasitology

Received Date: 7 February 2017 Revised Date:

10 April 2017

Accepted Date: 18 May 2017

Please cite this article as: Tritten, L., Tam, M., Vargas, M., Jardim, A., Stevenson, M.M., Keiser, J., Geary, T.G., Excretory/secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris, Experimental Parasitology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2017.05.003. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Excretory/secretory products from the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris

2

muris

3

Lucienne Trittena,b,e *, Mifong Tamb,c, Mireille Vargasd, Armando Jardima,b, Mary M.

4

Stevensonb,c, Jennifer Keiserd, Timothy G. Gearya,b

RI PT

1

5 6

a

7

Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada, b Centre for Host-Parasite Interactions, c Department

8

of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada, d

9

Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health

SC

Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne-de-

Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. e Current address:

11

Institute of Parasitology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zurich,

12

Switzerland

M AN U

10

TE D

13

* Corresponding author: Lucienne Tritten, Institute of Parasitology, University of Zurich,

15

Winterthurerstrasse 266a, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. e-mail: [email protected],

16

telephone: +41 44 635 85 24

18

19

20

AC C

17

EP

14

21

22

23

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

25

To better control gastrointestinal nematode infections in humans and animals, it is important

26

to understand the strategies used by these parasites to modulate the host immune system.

27

In this regard, molecules released by parasites have been attributed crucially important roles

28

in host-parasite negotiations. We characterized the excretory/secretory (E/S) microRNA

29

(miRNA) and protein profiles from the mouse gastrointestinal nematode parasite Trichuris

30

muris. Released miRNAs were subjected to miRNA sequencing and E/S proteins were

31

analysed by mass spectrometry. Fourteen miRNAs were identified in T. muris exosome-like

32

vesicles, as well as 73 proteins of nematode origin, 11 of which were unique to this study.

33

Comparison with published nematode protein secretomes revealed high conservation at the

34

functional level.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

24

35

AC C

EP

TE D

36

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

38

Parasites are masterful modulators of their host’s immune system, diverting responses to

39

their own advantage, a phenomenon in which microRNAs (miRNAs) and proteins have been

40

suggested to participate. miRNAs are small noncoding RNA entities ubiquitously present in

41

eukaryotes. They exert regulatory functions at the posttranscriptional level through

42

messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation and suppression of translation 1. Exosomes are

43

believed to be the main trafficking vehicle of extracellular miRNAs in biofluids 2 and display

44

selective miRNA profiles that differ from the global miRNA contents of the parent cell or

45

tissue 3. The miRBase registry contains a substantial number of parasitic helminth miRNAs,

46

but few studies have focused on circulating miRNAs released by parasitic nematodes into

47

their host or environment 4–9. Most efforts to characterize nematode miRNAs have been

48

based on whole-worm extracts 10–12 and do not describe the miRNA populations released by

49

parasites, which may serve in intercellular communication with their hosts. Awareness of the

50

potential importance of miRNAs at the functional level in host-helminth interactions has

51

begun to rise 4,13–15. For instance, a recent report revealed that exposure to exosomes from

52

Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri impaired the development of an innate immune response

53

to an allergen administered to mice 4.

54

Extensively investigated across many nematode species, excretory/secretory (E/S) proteins

55

are important players in immunomodulation, whose diverse roles have been (and are still

56

being) progressively characterized 16,17. Several parasite-derived proteins have been shown

57

to induce a Th2-skewed immune response, combined with regulatory and anti-inflammatory

58

components 17. Anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory effects of helminth E/S proteins have

59

been observed for many nematode species 18–22. E/S products fulfil a wide range of functions

60

in worm migration and feeding, including disarmament of host responses by inactivating

61

defence molecules (e.g., reactive oxygen species), and mimicry of host anti-inflammatory

62

molecules, among others 23.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

37

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In the present work, we describe the miRNA and protein profiles released by Trichuris muris

64

in vesicles of the size of exosomes. T. muris is grouped in Clade I of phylum Nematoda and

65

preferentially resides between the colon and the caecum 24,25. All parasitic stages stay in the

66

lumen, their anterior end penetrating into gut epithelial cells from which they feed. The T.

67

muris protein profile was compared to previously published secretomes of parasitic

68

nematode species, including the clade V murine gastrointestinal nematode, H. p. bakeri. We

69

also generated an E/S miRNA profile of H. p. bakeri, which was previously published

70

elsewhere 4, to validate our workflow and cross-laboratory reproducibility of miRNA

71

sequencing.

SC

RI PT

63

M AN U

72

73

74 2. Results

76

2.1. T. muris miRNA profile in pelleted vesicles/particles

77

13,684,186 raw reads were obtained from miRNA sequencing from T. muris isolated

78

vesicles/particles of the size of exosomes using polymer precipitation (Exoquick TC, System

79

Biosciences), 11,002,227 of which were mappable after removal of low-quality reads, junk

80

and short sequences. Reads unmapped to nematode genomes were further mapped to

81

mouse and mammalian genomes. In total, 130 unique nematode miRNA candidate

82

sequences were obtained (Supplementary Table S1), and another 128 mapped to mouse

83

miRNAs in miRBase (Supplementary Table S2). They were present at levels (copy numbers)

84

comparable to the worm-derived candidates. Excluding other types of RNA, as well as low-

85

confidence miRNAs (suboptimal mapping or folding properties), 14 high-confidence miRNA

86

candidates were obtained (as defined by genome mapping, homology with other nematode

AC C

EP

TE D

75

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 87

miRNAs and secondary structure properties (see 5.4), Table 1 and Supplementary Table

88

S1), only 7 of which were present in > 5 reads.

89 T. muris-secreted miRNA candidates

Name

Sequence

RI PT

Copy

Properties

#

359

cel-let-7-5p

TGAGGTAGTAGGTTGTATAGTT

126

asu-miR-252-5p_R-2

CTAAGTAGTAGTGCCGCAGGT

40

hco-miR-9_R-2

TCTTTGGTTATCTAGCTGTAT

18

TGGCAGTGTAGTTAGCTGGTTGT

12

TAAGGCACGCGGTGAATGCC

9

TGGAAGACTAGTGATTTTGTTGT

7

TTGCATAGTCACAAAAGTGATC

4

cel-miR-124-3p_R-1 asu-miR-7-5p_R1_1ss10GA bma-miR153_1ss22GC cel-miR-82-3p_R4_1ss10CA hco-mir-5972p5_2ss2GT21CA

M AN U

asu-miR-345p_1ss10GA

SC

AACCCGTAGATCCGATCTTGT

TE D

Reads map to other nematode miRNAs/premiRNAs in miRBase. The reads map to the T. muris genome. The sequences may form hairpins.

asu-miR-100a-5p_R3_1ss16AT

EP

cel-miR-79-3p_R-2

TGAGATCATAGTGAAAGC

2

TTAGGCTTAGGCTTAGGCTTAGGC

2

ATAAAGCTAGGTTACCAAAG

1

90 91 92 93 94

AC C

asu-mir-279aTGACTAGATCCACACTCATC 3p_2ss13TC19GT asu-miR-252-3p_RACCTGCTCCCTGCTACTTAAG 1_2ss15GA21CG bma-mir-236-1TAATACTGTCGGGTAAAGATGATT 3p_3ss11AG17TA20CT

1 1 1

Table 1. T. muris miRNA high confidence candidates. miRNA candidates for which genome mapping, homology to known nematode miRNAs and secondary structure support characterization as high confidence candidates. Names in bold and italics denote sequences identical to mouse miRNAs.

95

96

It should be noted that 6 of the 8 most abundant high-confidence sequences that map

97

perfectly to the T. muris genome (asu-miR-100a-5p_R-3_1ss16AT, cel-let-7-5p, hco-miR5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 98

9_R-2, cel-miR-124-3p_R-1, asu-miR-7-5p_R-1_1ss10GA, and bma-miR-153_1ss22GC)

99

present in the T. muris preparations are identical to known mouse miRNAs as well. Despite thorough washing of the parasites prior to culture, we cannot exclude the possibility that

101

mouse material was still present, and so cannot prove that these sequences are parasite-

102

derived.

RI PT

100

103

2.2. Validation of miRNA sequencing workflow using H. p. bakeri culture media

105

The robustness of the sequencing method was confirmed by a general agreement between

106

the previously published H. p. bakeri miRNA secretome 4, and our H. p. bakeri dataset

107

(Supplementary File 1 and Supplementary Table S3), despite methodological differences.

108

Following isolation of particles of the size of exosomes using polymer precipitation (Exoquick

109

TC, System Biosciences), 18 high-confidence miRNA candidates were identified; all had

110

been described by Buck and colleagues 4. Forty-four miRNA candidates mapped to the

111

mouse genome (Supplementary Table S4). Nanoparticle tracking analysis of H. p. bakeri

112

culture media revealed a main particle population of 109 ± 3.1 nm in diameter, at a total

113

concentration of 6.77 x 1010 particles/ml (Supplementary Fig S1). We cannot exclude the

114

presence of non-vesicular contaminants. Larger particles were also observed, but in much

115

lower abundance.

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

116

SC

104

117

2.3. T. muris protein profile in pelleted vesicles/particles

118

Proteomic analysis revealed the presence of 73 Trichuris proteins and 36 of mouse origin in

119

the isolated material of the size of exosomes (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S5).

120

Thirteen proteins were identified in only one of the two samples corresponding to two

121

consecutive elutions of the protein-binding column. Good agreement was observed between

122

both samples: the three most abundant proteins were the same, and 13 proteins appeared in

123

the top 15 in both samples. Only 16 identified proteins (21.9 %) were predicted to contain a 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT signal peptide cleavage site and another 14 (19.2 %) were predicted to be non-classically

125

secreted. An additional 19 proteins (26 %) in these samples have no known

126

excretory/secretory sequence motifs, but have been repeatedly associated with exosomes

127

and are listed in Exocarta (www.exocarta.org/). The remaining 24 proteins (33 %) may

128

originate from damaged worms, a possibility we cannot exclude. However, we did not detect

129

proteins that are typically the most abundant in cells, such as ribosomal or mitochondrial

130

proteins (e.g., adenine nucleotide translocator proteins and voltage-dependent anion

131

channel proteins 26), which would be expected to predominate in the sample if damaged

132

worms were present, and so believe that the detected proteins do not indicate the presence

133

of structurally compromised worms in the cultures.

M AN U

134

UniProt accession

Protein name Poly-cysteine and histidine tailed protein isoform 2

2

Actin

3

Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase

4

Dynein light chain

5

Histone domain containing protein

6

Uncharacterized protein

7

Uncharacterized protein

8

Intermediate filament protein (ifa)

9

Uncharacterized protein

10

14-3-3 protein

11

ATP synthase subunit beta

12

Ubiquitin associated and SH3

13

Triosephosphate isomerase

14

Uncharacterized protein

15

Fructose bisphosphate aldolase class I

T. trichiura, A0A077Z5Q5 T. trichiura, A0A077ZE37 T. trichiura, A0A077ZHV3 T. trichiura, A0A077ZJN3 T. trichiura, A0A077ZFV9 T. suis, A0A085MFD5 T. suis, A0A085MAM6 T. trichiura, A0A077Z6U0 T. suis, A0A085MIT4 T. trichiura, A0A077YXJ9 T. trichiura, A0A077Z3I0 T. trichiura, A0A077ZFQ2 T. trichiura, A0A077ZC84 T. trichiura, A0A077ZFC1 T. trichiura, A0A077Z6Y9

AC C

EP

TE D

1

SC

RI PT

124

Blast2GO description

Unique to this study

Poly-cysteine and histidine tailed protein isoform 2

yes

Actin-5c

no

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

no

Dynein light chain

no

Histone-like

no

Phosphoglycerate kinase

no

Galactoside-binding lectin

no

Intermediate filament protein ifa-1

no

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase

no

14-3-3 zeta

no

ATP synthase beta subunit

no

Ubiquitin associated and sh3 domain-containing protein b

no

Triosephosphate isomerase

no

Hypothetical protein TTRE_0000739101 Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase class-i

yes no

135 136 137

Table 2. Fifteen most abundant T. muris proteins found in isolated vesicles/particles. Proteins were mapped to Trichuridae; the UniProt accession number and the closest 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 138 139

Trichuris spp. used for identification are given, as well as the Blast2GO sequence description. Proteins are listed according to relative abundance.

140 We obtained gene ontology (GO) terms for 69 of the 73 protein names. Eleven proteins were

142

unique to this study, and to our knowledge, have not been reported in other nematode

143

secretomes. The most abundant predicted protein was mouse keratin, a common

144

contaminant found in proteomic studies. In the isolated particles of the size of exosomes, the

145

most abundant protein of nematode origin was poly-cysteine and histidine tailed protein

146

isoform 2. More than 50 % (39/73) of the T. muris proteins had previously been associated

147

with homologues found in mammalian exosomes, as noted in the Exocarta database.

148

No secreted protein was common to all 12 nematode secretomes compared (Supplementary

149

Table S5). Glutathione S-transferase was reported to be secreted by 9 of the compared

150

species, and enolase in 8. Actin, triosephosphate isomerase, aldolase and galectins were

151

found in the secreted particles of T. muris and 7 other parasitic nematodes. All are common

152

exosomal proteins.

153

In agreement with published H. p. bakeri data 27 (Fig 1) and other nematode protein

154

secretomes reported from our laboratory 18,27–29, the GO terms “binding” (GO:0005488) and

155

“catalytic activity” (GO:0003824) were the most frequent level 2 molecular function

156

categories. Under “biological process” (level 2), the terms “cellular process” (GO:0009987),

157

“metabolic process” (GO:0008152) and “single-organism process” were the major groups.

158

Indeed, the biological processes in play presented some differences with H. p. bakeri, for

159

which the three main categories were “multicellular organismal process”, “developmental

160

process”, and “biological regulation”. Secretory protein profiles appeared relatively similar in

161

T. muris (vesicular component), H. p. bakeri, and B. malayi; terms attributed to H. p. bakeri

162

proteins resembled B. malayi more than T. muris.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

141

8

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

169

Figure 1. Gene ontology analysis of the identified T. muris proteins compared to other nematode secretomes. The distribution of level 2 GO terms for biological processes (A) and molecular functions (B), as assigned by Blast2GO. H. p. bakeri and B. malayi GO distribution data and the top 3 (level 2) GO terms for A. suum and D. immitis were retrieved from previous reports 18,27–29.

AC C

164 165 166 167 168

TE D

163

170

The distribution of level 4 biological process and molecular function terms for T. muris

171

closely follows the pattern observed for B. malayi and D. immitis secreted proteins 18,29

172

(Supplementary Fig S2).

173 174 175 176

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3. Discussion

178

We present excretory/secretory miRNA and protein profiles of the murine gastrointestinal

179

parasitic nematode T. muris. After subjecting concentrated culture media to a polymer-based

180

vesicle precipitation, we identified 14 high confidence miRNA candidates and 73 proteins.

181

Because worms were washed thoroughly before incubation in culture media, we did not

182

expect a significant contribution from the host. However, since some miRNA candidate

183

sequences and proteins were predicted to be of mouse origin, it is possible that some mouse

184

intestinal tissue was removed with the worms and remained despite washes, releasing host

185

material/vesicles into culture media. However, the possibility that host miRNAs and proteins

186

are taken up by the worm and packaged into worm-derived vesicles cannot be dismissed.

187

Similarly, it is possible that some worms may have been damaged upon removal from the

188

host, releasing non-secretory material into the culture media.

189

The overlap between miRNAs from both mouse gastrointestinal nematodes (T. muris and H.

190

p. bakeri (both Buck and colleagues’ 4 and current datasets) was minor: of all T. muris

191

miRNAs (high and low confidence), only four were 100% identical or varied in length only in

192

the 3’ end compared to H. p. bakeri miRNAs (let-7-5p, miR-9, miR-124, and miR-79). miR-

193

100a, miR-34, and miR-252 presented minor substitutions compared to H. p. bakeri miRNA

194

sequences. miR-100a, the most abundant candidate in T. muris-derived particles of the size

195

of exosomes, was also the second most abundant candidate in D. immitis-infected dog blood

196

8

197

from our H. p. bakeri dataset, but was present in the previous work 4. miR-9 and miR-252

198

were abundant in exosome-like vesicles from B. malayi L3 5 but remain functionally

199

uncharacterized in nematodes. In mouse intestinal tissue, the most abundant miRNAs are

200

miR-192, followed by miR-215, and members of the let-7 family 30. In both T. muris and H. p.

201

bakeri culture media, neither miR-192 nor miR-215 ranks among the 30 most abundant

202

sequences.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

177

. Among the 14 high confidence miRNAs present in T. muris media, miR-252 was absent

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Some miRNA sequences attributed to nematode secretions could be of mouse origin;

204

sequence identity prevents the determination of the relative contribution by host vs. parasite.

205

miR-124 was described in mouse intestine among other tissues 31. However, not all host-

206

identical miRNA species found in T. muris exosome-like particles are reported to occur in

207

murine intestinal tissue. For instance, miR-9 and miR-99a (identical to asu-miR-100a-5p_R-

208

3_1ss16AT) are specifically brain-enriched miRNAs in the mouse 31. Others, like let-7a, are

209

expressed in many mouse tissues 31. Besides well-described roles in developmental timing

210

in C. elegans, let-7a acts as a regulator of the murine and human immune systems. For

211

example, let-7a directly inhibits the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and has

212

been linked to cancer 32.

213

If most mammalian miRNA targets are highly conserved 33, it is also true for some miRNAs

214

conserved across nematodes 14. Nearly 50 % (6/14) of the high-confidence miRNAs found in

215

the T. muris culture media shared sequence identity with mouse miRNAs. In a context of

216

host-pathogen crosstalk and of host manipulation by the parasite via miRNA transfer, as has

217

been suggested 4,5, the extent of the overlap between host and parasite miRNAs (or seed

218

sequences) may reflect host-parasite specificity. It is worth noting that several secreted

219

parasite miRNAs (i.e., miR-9 and some members of the miR-100 family) are more conserved

220

between B. malayi and its human host than with C. elegans 5. In line with this, a number of

221

H. p. bakeri miRNAs released in exosomes were identical or homologous to mouse miRNAs

222

and there is evidence that these are used to modulate host immune functions 4. Clearly,

223

more investigations are needed to draw firm conclusions in this respect.

224

mmu-miR-26a-5p was the most frequently detected mouse miRNA, whereas it is only the 8th

225

most highly expressed murine gut miRNA 30. The intestinal epithelium expresses relatively

226

high levels of miR-26a, which represses a number of proliferation-associated genes in this

227

tissue, including genes involved in tumorigenesis 34.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

203

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT We detected only a fraction of the released miRNAs previously reported for H. p. bakeri 4,

229

which may be due to different vesicle/particle isolation protocols between the studies, the

230

number of worms used, or the duration of incubation in culture media (2 days versus 3

231

weeks). Nonetheless, all high-confidence miRNA sequences identified in the current work

232

were consistent. These results suggest that miRNA secretion is a robust phenomenon for

233

nematodes in culture, and that high-confidence sequences obtained using different methods

234

and equipment are comparable.

235

Only 41 % of proteins released by T. muris in vesicles/particles were predicted to be

236

secreted by SignalP or SecretomeP. However, many of the remaining protein sequences

237

have been reported in E/S products from other nematodes, as described in Supplementary

238

Table S5. Including hits from our search in Exocarta, 67 % of these proteins have been

239

associated with secretion and/or exosomal transport, near the proportion reported for B.

240

malayi larval exosome-like vesicles 5. We compared T. muris-derived proteins with 14

241

published secretomes of nematodes classified in clades I, III, or V. Most proteins released by

242

T. muris have been described in other nematode secretomes and overall, there was a high

243

degree of conservation of secreted proteins at the functional level. Although we lack visual

244

evidence for the presence of exosome-like vesicles in the T. muris sample, typical vesicular

245

proteins were well represented in our sample, dominated by cytoskeletal proteins, metabolic

246

enzymes, zeta polypeptide, heat shock proteins, etc.35 . This is in line with recent evidence

247

that different species and stages of nematodes release microvesicles 4,5,36. Heat shock

248

protein 70, GAPDH, ezrin, moesin, actin and tubulin are common cargo of many different

249

types of vesicles 37. A few known immunomodulators were recognized in this study, among

250

them a galectin and a glutathione-S-transferase 38. We identified ten enzymes involved in

251

energy metabolism (glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and gluconeogenesis). Among them,

252

the well-known exosomal proteins aldolase, enolase and triosephosphate isomerase are

253

commonly observed in nematode E/S products 18,28,29,39–41. Trypsins were described in the

254

secretome of T. spiralis, another clade I nematode 42, and H. p. bakeri 40. Hasnain and

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

228

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT colleagues reported serine protease activity in T. muris secretions 43, and we found five

256

proteins with trypsin domains that could have a similar biological function. A Von Willebrand

257

factor-like protein has also been described to be secreted proteins by the liver fluke Fasciola

258

hepatica 44; its role remains to be explored. Thirty-nine % of the level 2 GO terms describing

259

molecular functions indicated catalytic activity. Level 4 GO terms revealed peptidase activity

260

and serine hydrolase activity, among others. The importance of helminth proteases at all

261

stages of infection has been widely acknowledged 45, and in T. muris chronic infections, they

262

degrade mucins which may confer protection from parasite expulsion 43.

263

Because experimental differences (vesicle/particle precipitation, technical aspects in LC-MS

264

analysis and amount of protein analysed for these studies) impact on the outcome, a direct

265

cross-study comparison is both qualitatively and quantitatively difficult. However, available

266

data obtained by gene ontology predict that more T. muris proteins are functionally similar to

267

the B. malayi (up to 26 5,18,19), N. brasiliensis (19 46), and D. immitis (16 29) secretomes than

268

to the H.p. bakeri (14 27) secretome and that of the phylogenetically closer species T. spiralis

269

muscle larvae 42.

270

A major difference between the secretions from the two gastrointestinal nematodes H. p.

271

bakeri and T. muris is the absence of venom allergen-like proteins in the T. muris sample

272

compared to their predominance in the material from H. p. bakeri 27,40, and other gut

273

parasites such as A. caninum and H. contortus 41,47, all of which are clade V nematodes.

274

Similarly, these proteins are absent in secretions from A. suum 28. If venom allergens are

275

present in the genus Trichuris, they are only distant homologues of H. polygyrus, B. malayi,

276

or Ancylostoma venom allergen proteins, as revealed by a BLAST analysis yielding poor E-

277

values (not shown). The role of nematode venom allergen-like proteins is unclear, and the

278

functional significance of their apparent absence from T. muris remains to be resolved.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

255

279

280

4. Conclusion 13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT We report 14 high-confidence T. muris miRNA candidates released in culture media, four of

282

which are identical to miRNAs released by another mouse gastrointestinal parasitic

283

nematode, H. p. bakeri. Some features in the ES protein profiles of the vesicular component

284

we present here are common to other parasitic species, and may represent a general

285

secretomic signature of parasitic nematodes. Differences in the composition of secreted

286

material may reflect both methodological differences and/or the evolutionary distance

287

between T. muris and the compared nematode species.

SC

288

RI PT

281

5. Methods

290

5.1. Ethics statement

291

All experimental protocols were approved, either by the Animal Ethics Committee of McGill

292

University and the Canadian Council on Animal Care or by the veterinary authorities of the

293

Canton Basel-Stadt, Switzerland (licence no. 2070), based on Swiss regulations.

294

Experiments were conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.

295

5.2. Parasite maintenance and culture

296

The T. muris life cycle was maintained as described 48. Dexamethasone-treated (1 mg/l

297

drinking water, Sigma-Aldrich) C57BL/10 female mice (Harlan, Blackthorn, UK) were

298

infected orally with 200 embryonated eggs and maintained for 6 weeks until sacrifice (CO2)

299

and dissection. Approximately 3000 adult T. muris were washed and cultured for 18-48 h at

300

37°C, in filter-sterilized RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml

301

streptomycin and 2.5 µg/ml amphotericin B at a concentration of 10-20 worms/ml. Media

302

were pooled and centrifuged at 5000 x g for 10 min prior to concentration on 3000 Da

303

centrifugal filter units (Amicon Ultracel, Millipore), centrifuged at 8000 x g for 10 min and

304

stored at -20°C.

305

5.3. Vesicle isolation, RNA and protein purification

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

289

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Vesicles/particles of the size of exosomes were precipitated with ExoQuick-TC (System

307

Biosciences). Total RNA and protein were subsequently isolated with a kit (Norgen Biotek,

308

#24100, “blood” protocol), yielding 6.5 µg RNA. For proteins, two consecutive column

309

elutions were performed, resulting in 565 and 661 µg of protein, respectively.

310

5.4. RNA sequencing

311

RNA quality was assessed by LC Sciences, and Illumina deep-sequencing of small RNAs

312

was performed (50 base pair single-end reads) following a proprietary pipeline using 1 µg

313

RNA. Low-quality sequences and other RNA populations (Rfam, Repbase; 49,50 were

314

removed and the remaining sequences of 18-24 nucleotides in length were mapped to the T.

315

muris genome

316

(ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/project/pathogens/Trichuris/muris/genome/version_2b/Tmuris_v2b

317

.genome_scaffolds.fa), mRNA

318

(ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/project/pathogens/Trichuris/muris/genes/geneSet2.1_Feb2013.nu

319

cl.fasta), and nematode miRNAs/pre-miRNAs in miRBase v.21.0 51. Next, sequences were

320

mapped to the mouse genome (M. musculus). Since no entry exists in miRBase for T. muris,

321

high confidence candidates are defined by successful mapping to the worm genome,

322

homology with other nematode miRNAs and the capacity of the extended genome region to

323

form a hairpin. Raw data are available from the NCBI GEO database at

324

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE93667.

325

5.5. Proteomic analysis

326

T. muris proteins from the vesicular component were analysed by liquid chromatography-

327

tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at the Quebec Genomics Centre proteomics

328

platform, University Laval, for proteomics analysis.

329

An overnight tryptic digestion was performed on 1.0 µg protein in solution and analysed as

330

described 52. Reverse-phase nanoscale capillary liquid chromatography (Agilent 12000 nano

331

pump) was employed to separate peptides before analysis by electrospray tandem MS/MS

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

306

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (5600 Mass Spectrometer, AB Sciex, Farmingham, MA, USA). PicoFrit columns (New

333

Objective, Woburn, MA, USA) packed with Jupiter (Phenomonex) 5u, 300A C18 served for

334

separation and were eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile (2-30 %) solvent, 0.1 %

335

formic acid. Spectra were acquired using Analyst v.1.6 and analysed with Mascot (Matrix

336

Science, London, UK; v. 2.4.1) and X! Tandem (The GPM, thegpm.org; version CYCLONE

337

(2010.12.01.1)). The TAX_MusMusculus_10090_20141118 database (unknown version,

338

116602 entries) and the TAX_Trichuris_36086_20141217 database were used. Scaffold (v.

339

4.4.1.1, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA) enabled the validation of MS/MS-

340

based peptide and protein identities. For peptide identification, >16.0 % probability to

341

achieve a false discovery rate (FDR) <1.0 % was set. Protein identities were validated when

342

>99.0 % probability to achieve a FDR <1.0 % and a minimum of 2 identified peptides were

343

achieved. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm 53. Proteins

344

containing undistinguishable peptides were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony.

345

Protein relative abundance (within the sample only) was assessed using the normalized

346

spectral abundance factor in Scaffold (NSAF). Protein descriptions for UniProt accession

347

numbers were obtained in Blast2GO (v. 3.0.8) 54. Both protein names from Scaffold and

348

sequence descriptions obtained from Blast2GO were used for comparison in published

349

nematode secretomes 5,18,19,27–29,40–42,46,47 and the Litomosoides sigmodontis predicted

350

secretome 39. The protein names or Blast2GO descriptions were submitted to Exocarta 35

351

(accessed on 28th of December 2016), in search of reported associations with exosomes in

352

mammals. Secretory properties were further evaluated using SignalP (v. 4.1) and

353

SecretomeP (v. 2.0) 55,56.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

354

RI PT

332

355

356

357 16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 358

6. References

359

1. Rana, T. M. Illuminating the silence: understanding the structure and function of small

361 362

RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 23–36 (2007). 2. Gallo, A., Tandon, M., Alevizos, I. & Illei, G. G. The majority of microRNAs detectable in serum and saliva is concentrated in exosomes. PloS One 7, e30679 (2012).

RI PT

360

3. Valadi, H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel

364

mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659 (2007).

365

4. Buck, A. H. et al. Exosomes secreted by nematode parasites transfer small RNAs to

366

mammalian cells and modulate innate immunity. Nat. Commun. 5, 5488 (2014).

SC

363

5. Zamanian, M. et al. Release of small RNA-containing exosome-like vesicles from the

368

human filarial parasite Brugia malayi. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0004069 (2015).

372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381

7. Quintana, J. F. et al. Extracellular Onchocerca-derived small RNAs in host nodules and blood. Parasit. Vectors 8, 58 (2015).

TE D

371

helminth infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2701 (2014).

8. Tritten, L. et al. Detection of circulating parasite-derived microRNAs in filarial infections. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2971 (2014).

9. Tritten, L. et al. Loa loa and Onchocerca ochengi miRNAs detected in host circulation.

EP

370

6. Hoy, A. M. et al. Parasite-derived microRNAs in host serum as novel biomarkers of

Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 198, 14–17 (2014). 10. Poole, C. B. et al. Diversity and expression of microRNAs in the filarial parasite, Brugia

AC C

369

M AN U

367

malayi. PloS One 9, e96498 (2014). 11. Winter, A. D. et al. Diversity in parasitic nematode genomes: the microRNAs of Brugia pahangi and Haemonchus contortus are largely novel. BMC Genomics 13, 4 (2012). 12. Wang, J. et al. Deep small RNA sequencing from the nematode Ascaris reveals

382

conservation, functional diversification, and novel developmental profiles. Genome Res.

383

21, 1462–1477 (2011).

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 384

13. Coakley, G., Maizels, R. M. & Buck, A. H. Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles: the new communicators in parasite infections. Trends Parasitol. 31, 477–489 (2015).

386

14. Tritten, L. & Geary, T. G. MicroRNAs of filarial nematodes: a new frontier in host-

387

pathogen interactions, in: Non-coding RNAs and Inter-kingdom Communication,

388

Springer International Publishing (2016).

389

RI PT

385

15. Britton, C., Winter, A. D., Gillan, V. & Devaney, E. microRNAs of parasitic helminths -

390

Identification, characterization and potential as drug targets. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug

391

Resist. 4, 85–94 (2014).

394 395 396

SC

393

16. McSorley, H. J., Hewitson, J. P. & Maizels, R. M. Immunomodulation by helminth

parasites: defining mechanisms and mediators. Int. J. Parasitol. 43, 301–310 (2013). 17. Harnett, W. Secretory products of helminth parasites as immunomodulators. Mol.

M AN U

392

Biochem. Parasitol. 195, 130–136 (2014).

18. Moreno, Y. & Geary, T. G. Stage- and gender-specific proteomic analysis of Brugia malayi excretory-secretory products. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2, e326 (2008).

398

19. Bennuru, S. et al. Brugia malayi excreted/secreted proteins at the host/parasite

TE D

397

399

interface: stage- and gender-specific proteomic profiling. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e410

400

(2009).

20. Pineda, M. A., Lumb, F., Harnett, M. M. & Harnett, W. ES-62, a therapeutic anti-

EP

401

inflammatory agent evolved by the filarial nematode Acanthocheilonema viteae. Mol.

403

Biochem. Parasitol. 194, 1–8 (2014).

AC C

402

404

21. Jex, A. R. et al. Ascaris suum draft genome. Nature 479, 529–533 (2011).

405

22. Schwarz, E. M. et al. The genome and developmental transcriptome of the strongylid

406 407 408 409 410

nematode Haemonchus contortus. Genome Biol. 14, R89 (2013). 23. Ditgen, D. et al. Harnessing the helminth secretome for therapeutic immunomodulators. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 964350 (2014). 24. Bansemir, A. D. & Sukhdeo, M. V. The food resource of adult Heligmosomoides polygyrus in the small intestine. J. Parasitol. 80, 24–28 (1994).

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 411

25. Hüttemann, M., Schmahl, G. & Mehlhorn, H. Light and electron microscopic studies on

412

two nematodes, Angiostrongylus cantonensis and Trichuris muris, differing in their mode

413

of nutrition. Parasitol. Res. 101 Suppl 2, S225-232 (2007).

415 416

26. Calvo, S. E. & Mootha, V. K. The mitochondrial proteome and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 25–44 (2010).

RI PT

414

27. Moreno, Y. et al. Proteomic analysis of excretory-secretory products of

417

Heligmosomoides polygyrus assessed with next-generation sequencing transcriptomic

418

information. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1370 (2011).

28. Chehayeb, J. F., Robertson, A. P., Martin, R. J. & Geary, T. G. Proteomic analysis of

SC

419

adult Ascaris suum fluid compartments and secretory products. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8,

421

e2939 (2014).

424 425 426 427 428

immitis. Parasit. Vectors 5, 140 (2012).

30. McKenna, L. B. et al. MicroRNAs control intestinal epithelial differentiation, architecture, and barrier function. Gastroenterology 139, 1654–1664, 1664.e1 (2010).

TE D

423

29. Geary, J. et al. First analysis of the secretome of the canine heartworm, Dirofilaria

31. Lagos-Quintana, M. et al. Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr. Biol. CB 12, 735–739 (2002).

32. Iliopoulos, D., Hirsch, H. A. & Struhl, K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB,

EP

422

M AN U

420

Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell 139, 693–

430

706 (2009).

431 432 433 434 435 436

AC C

429

33. Friedman, R. C., Farh, K. K.-H., Burge, C. B. & Bartel, D. P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 19, 92–105 (2009). 34. Zeitels, L. R. et al. Tumor suppression by miR-26 overrides potential oncogenic activity in intestinal tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 28, 2585–2590 (2014). 35. Keerthikumar, S. et al. ExoCarta: A Web-Based Compendium of Exosomal Cargo. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 688–692 (2016).

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 437

36. Hansen, E. P., Kringel, H., Williams, A. R. & Nejsum, P. Secretion of RNA-Containing

438

Extracellular Vesicles by the Porcine Whipworm, Trichuris suis. J. Parasitol. 101, 336–

439

340 (2015).

440

37. Kowal, J. et al. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.

442

A. 113, E968-977 (2016).

444 445

38. Johnston, M. J. G., MacDonald, J. A. & McKay, D. M. Parasitic helminths: a

pharmacopeia of anti-inflammatory molecules. Parasitology 136, 125–147 (2009).

39. Armstrong, S. D. et al. Comparative analysis of the secretome from a model filarial

SC

443

RI PT

441

nematode (Litomosoides sigmodontis) reveals maximal diversity in gravid female

447

parasites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics MCP 13, 2527–2544 (2014).

448

M AN U

446

40. Hewitson, J. P. et al. Proteomic analysis of secretory products from the model

449

gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus reveals dominance of venom

450

allergen-like (VAL) proteins. J. Proteomics 74, 1573–1594 (2011). 41. Yatsuda, A. P., Krijgsveld, J., Cornelissen, A. W. C. A., Heck, A. J. R. & de Vries, E.

TE D

451

Comprehensive analysis of the secreted proteins of the parasite Haemonchus contortus

453

reveals extensive sequence variation and differential immune recognition. J. Biol. Chem.

454

278, 16941–16951 (2003).

455

EP

452

42. Wang, L., Cui, J., Hu, D. D., Liu, R. D. & Wang, Z. Q. Identification of early diagnostic antigens from major excretory-secretory proteins of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae

457

using immunoproteomics. Parasit. Vectors 7, 40 (2014).

458

AC C

456

43. Hasnain, S. Z., McGuckin, M. A., Grencis, R. K. & Thornton, D. J. Serine protease(s)

459

secreted by the nematode Trichuris muris degrade the mucus barrier. PLoS Negl. Trop.

460

Dis. 6, e1856 (2012).

461 462 463 464

44. Wilson, R. A. et al. Exploring the Fasciola hepatica tegument proteome. Int. J. Parasitol. 41, 1347–1359 (2011). 45. McKerrow, J. H., Caffrey, C., Kelly, B., Loke, P. ’ng & Sajid, M. Proteases in parasitic diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 1, 497–536 (2006). 20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 465

46. Sotillo, J. et al. Secreted proteomes of different developmental stages of the

466

gastrointestinal nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics MCP 13,

467

2736–2751 (2014). 47. Mulvenna, J. et al. Proteomics analysis of the excretory/secretory component of the

469

blood-feeding stage of the hookworm, Ancylostoma caninum. Mol. Cell. Proteomics

470

MCP 8, 109–121 (2009).

474 475 476 477 478 479

49. Gardner, P. P. et al. Rfam: Wikipedia, clans and the ‘decimal’ release. Nucleic Acids

SC

473

against Trichuris spp. J. Microbiol. Methods 87, 169–175 (2011).

Res. 39, D141-145 (2011).

50. Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements.

M AN U

472

48. Silbereisen, A., Tritten, L. & Keiser, J. Exploration of novel in vitro assays to study drugs

Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462–467 (2005).

51. Griffiths-Jones, S., Saini, H. K., van Dongen, S. & Enright, A. J. miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D154-158 (2008). 52. Bondu, S. et al. Bioassay-guided fractionation approach for determination of protein

TE D

471

RI PT

468

480

precursors of proteolytic bioactive metabolites from macroalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. (2014).

481

doi:10.1007/s10811-014-0425-0

484 485 486

EP

483

53. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 (2003). 54. Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in

AC C

482

functional genomics research. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 21, 3674–3676 (2005). 55. Bendtsen, J. D., Jensen, L. J., Blom, N., Von Heijne, G. & Brunak, S. Feature-based

487

prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng. Des. Sel.

488

PEDS 17, 349–356 (2004).

489

56. Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating

490

signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786 (2011).

491 492 493 21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 494

Acknowledgments

495

We are grateful to Daniel Defoy from the plate-forme protéomique du Centre Génomique de

496

Québec, Université Laval for assistance with the proteomics analyses.

RI PT

497 Funding

499

We thank the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (fellowship # 320382 to LT, and grant

500

# MOP130369 to MMS), the Canada Research Chairs, Canadian Natural Sciences and

501

Engineering Research Council (to TGG), the Centre for Host-Parasite Interactions (Fonds de

502

Recherche du Québec – Nature et Technologies), and the European Research Council

503

(ERC-2013-CoG 614739-A_HERO to JK) for funding and support.

M AN U

SC

498

504 Authors’ contributions

506

LT, AJ, and TGG designed the study. LT, MT, and MV performed the experiments. MMS and

507

JK provided the parasite material. LT analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the

508

manuscript, AJ, MMS, JK and TGG revisited the manuscript critically. All authors read and

509

approved the final manuscript.

EP

AC C

510

TE D

505

511

Additional information

512

Competing financial interests

513

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

514

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10. Supplementary Figure and legend

M AN U

SC

RI PT

515

516

TE D

EP

520

Supplementary Figure S1. NanoSight measurement of microvesicles in H. p. bakeri culture media. Size distribution of observed microvesicles obtained by dividing the average size by the concentration. Red bars indicate ±1x standard error of the mean

AC C

517 518 519

23

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

525 526 527 528 529 530

EP

524

Supplementary Figure S2. Level 4 GO terms distribution for T. muris secreted proteins. A) biological process, B) molecular functions.

AC C

522 523

TE D

521

531 532 533 534

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 535

11. Legends to supplementary files submitted separately:

536 537

Supplementary File 1. Methods and Results to H. p. bakeri miRNA sequencing.

538 Supplementary Table S1. T. muris miRNA candidates. miRNA candidates were grouped

540

into clusters according to genome mapping and homology to known nematode miRNAs.

RI PT

539

541

Supplementary Table S2. Mouse miRNAs found in T. muris exosomes. miRNA

543

candidates were also mapped to the host genome and similarly grouped into clusters

544

according to genome mapping and homology to known nematode miRNAs.

545

M AN U

SC

542

546

Supplementary Table S3. H. p. bakeri miRNA candidates from isolated exosomes.

547

miRNA candidates were grouped into clusters according to genome mapping and homology

548

to known nematode miRNAs.

TE D

549

Supplementary Table S4. Mouse miRNAs found in H. p. bakeri exosomes. miRNA

551

candidates were also mapped to the host genome and similarly grouped into clusters

552

according to genome mapping and homology to known nematode miRNAs.

553

EP

550

Supplementary Table S5. T. muris excretory/secretory proteins. Detailed information on

555

T. muris and mouse proteins identified by mass spectrometry in culture media in two

556

samples. For predicted T. muris proteins, a Blast2GO description is given, as well as

557

predictions for secretion and presence in other nematode secretomes.

AC C

554

558 559

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights We characterized the microRNAs and proteins in vesicles released by Trichuris muris.



Fourteen miRNAs were identified in T. muris exosome-like vesicles.



We found 73 proteins of nematode origin, 11 of which were unique to this study.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT