Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 1/9 REVIEW Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019) -, -–1443-9506/19/$36.00 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007 ...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 104 Views

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 1/9

REVIEW

Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019) -, -–1443-9506/19/$36.00 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

Q1

Q4

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy David Prior, MBBS, PhD a,b,*, Andre La Gerche, MBBS, PhD a,c a

National Centre for Sports Cardiology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne at St Vincent’s Hospital (Melbourne), Melbourne, Vic, Australia c Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Vic, Australia b

Received 5 November 2019; received in revised form 8 December 2019; accepted 10 December 2019; online published-ahead-of-print xxx

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a group of cardiomyopathies associated with ventricular arrhythmias predominantly arising from the right ventricle, sudden cardiac death and right ventricular failure, caused largely due to inherited mutations in proteins of the desmosomal complex. Whilst long recognised as a cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) during exercise, it has recently been recognised that intense and prolonged exercise can worsen the disease resulting in earlier and more severe phenotypic expression. Changes in cardiac structure and function as a result of exercise training also pose challenges with diagnosis as enlargement of the right ventricle is commonly seen in endurance athletes. Advice regarding restriction of exercise is an important part of patient management, not only of those with established disease, but also in individuals known to carry gene mutations associated with development of ARVC. Keywords

Arrhythmogenic  Cardiomyopathy  Exercise  ARVC  Genetics

Introduction The term arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy encompasses a group of cardiomyopathies with a similar phenotype and a tendency to ventricular arrhythmias accompanying or preceding structural and functional changes of the myocardium. The alternate term of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) reflects the fact that the earliest descriptions of the disease noted patchy inflammation, fibrosis and dysfunction disproportionately affecting the right ventricle (RV), but more recent observations have recognised that the left ventricle is commonly involved, sometimes even in isolation. ARVC (used subsequently reflecting the dominant use throughout contemporary literature) is often caused by abnormalities in desmosomal proteins and is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), particularly during exercise. What has also been appreciated more recently is the important interaction of this condition with exercise and athletic training. It has long been known that ARVC is an important cause of sudden cardiac death with exercise [1], but more recently it has been recognised

that athletic training can accelerate the progression of the disease [2–4] and also that excessive endurance exercise may be a cause of an ARVC-like phenotype, even in the absence of genetic abnormalities known to be associated with ARVC [5–8]. This review will examine the evidence for the relationship between ARVC, exercise and SCD and the clinical implications of this for patient management.

Pathogenesis of ARVC Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies are due to mutations in genes encoding proteins in the intercalated disc, most commonly desmosomal proteins, which are involved in cell adhesion and cell-to-cell communication. Most cases are due to mutations in one of 5 genes encoding desmosomal proteins; desmoplakin (DSP), plakoglobin (JUP), plakophilin 2 (PKP2), desmoglein 2 (DSG2) and desmocollin 2 (DSC2) (Figure 1). Together these genes account for 40–50% of ARVC cases [9] with PKP2 being the most commonly affected gene. Inheritance is usually autosomal dominant, meaning that

*Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, 3065, Victoria, Australia; Email: [email protected] Ó 2019 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 2/9

119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183

print & web 4C=FPO

2

D. Prior, A. La Gerche

Figure 1 Integrity of the desmosome may be compromised by mutations in the desmosomal proteins. This results in disruption of the myocte junctions leading to development of the arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) phenotype. The addition of repeated bouts of exercise, in the presence or absence of desmosomal mutations, may cause or accelerate disruption of the junctions. Reproduced from Heidbuchel et al. [8].

50% of off-spring of an affected individual will carry the gene mutation and be at risk of developing the ARVC phenotype, although penetrance is incomplete and expression is variable. In some patients (1–16%), mutations are present in more than one ARVC-related gene and the presence of multiple mutations is associated with a more severe phenotype and worse outcomes [10–13]. There have also been mutations in non-desmosomal genes described which also give rise to inherited arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. These include cadherin 2 (CDH2), catenin alpha 3 (CTTNA3), transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGFß3), titin, transmembrane protein 43 (TMEM-43), phospholamban (PLN) and lamin (LMNA). There is considerable variability in the resulting phenotype with frequent involvement of the left ventricle. This explains some of the shift in nomenclature to the broader term of

arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, of which ARVC forms a subset. Future revisions of disease definitions may combine the genetic and clinical aspects of the disease or consider them separately. This is not simple semantics as already there are potential differences in the way in which genetic subsets may respond to environmental stressors such as exercise.

Clinical Presentation of ARVC Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies may come to medical attention in a variety of ways but the earliest manifestation is most frequently with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, hence the retention of the word arrhythmogenic in all versions of the expanding nomenclature. The spectrum extends,

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 3/9

3

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313

Q2

however, from affected individuals who present with sudden cardiac death to asymptomatic family members of individuals with known disease who carry causative gene mutations. Within the spectrum are those with ventricular arrhythmias, those with right ventricular failure and those with cardiomegaly on a chest X-ray or an enlarged right ventricle on imaging such as echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Although the spectrum of disease includes patients in whom structural abnormalities of the RV (or LV) are the dominant finding, initial presentation with heart failure is rare. Rather, heart failure seems to be an end-stage consequence of a long period of symptomatic disease and, intriguingly, is greatly over-represented in those ARVC patients participating in endurance sports [2]. There is a recognised typical pattern of progression of the disease which impacts on the mode of presentation and how it varies with age. The earliest phase may be asymptomatic or concealed disease, but in which the risk of SCD, particularly during exercise, is significant. It is this phase that forms the rationale for screening strategies. The disease may progress to symptomatic and more sustained arrhythmias in the third and fourth decades and later to progressive right heart failure in the fifth decade of life and beyond. However, there is massive variability in phenotypic expression ranging from more fulminant presentations through to genotype positive patients who remain completely free of disease throughout their life. The factors underpinning this variability are complex but it is clear that exercise is a significant modifier of disease expression. There is some controversy around whether ARVC is a relentlessly progressive disease. Some excellent short- to mid-term outcomes have been demonstrated following electrophysiological procedures in which the abnormal myocardium is modified with ablation [14]. At least some of these patients seem to enjoy a benign clinical course with little or no progression of structural and functional abnormalities. However, the weight of evidence favours a progressive process with a highly variable course, but in which exercise has been repeatedly observed to be a key determinant [15]. Because of the clinical heterogeneity of ARVC, the diagnosis is made using recognised Task Force Criteria (TFC) which incorporate findings in multiple domains including imaging, electrocardiography, electrophysiology, histology and family history [16]. These abnormal findings provide major and minor criteria for a positive diagnosis of ARVC. Diagnosis is considered definite with two major criteria or one major plus two minor criteria. A borderline diagnosis is established with one major plus one minor or three minor criteria [16]. The diagnosis of ARVC is made more challenging in endurance athletes because the degree of remodelling of the RV in many healthy athletes meets some of the modified taskforce criteria for ARVC. For example, in a cohort of endurance athletes examined by echocardiography, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) size fulfilled a major criterion for ARVC in 25% of athletes, with 50% exceeding the

dimension for a minor criterion [17]. Similarly, elite endurance athletes have an increased rate of T-wave inversion in the right precordial electrocardiogram (ECG) leads (V1 to V3) when compared to non-endurance athletes (4% vs 0.2%), a finding which provides one positive task force criterion [18]. This appears to be due to lateral displacement of these dilated hearts such that a greater proportion of the RV is placed situated under the right precordial ECG leads [19]. Thus a dilated RVOT in association with T-wave inversion in a healthy athlete could result in a definite diagnosis of ARVC according to TFC. It is not yet clear whether this ambiguity is clarified or amplified by the more widespread use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). This is discussed in more detail in a specific review article addressing the challenge of differentiating ARVC from the normal athlete’s heart [20].

A Mechanism Explaining an Interaction Between Exercise and ARVC As a result of the alteration of proteins within the intercalated discs, there is disruption of normal cell adhesion and mechanical stability, cell to cell communication and electrical coupling. It has been postulated that this results in instability in the setting of mechanical stress, such as that which occurs with exercise. It has been shown that wall stress on the RV increases more than that on the LV during exercise [21], an observation which may explain part of the predilection for desmosomal mutations to impact the RV more than the LV. Using a simple analogy, if the desmosomes represent the ‘glue’ connecting the myocytes then disease can become manifest by weakness of the glue (genetic mutations of the desmosomes), by high mechanical force on the glue (intense exercise) or both (see Figure 1). This concept of an interaction between genetic and environmental stressors combining to variable extents to result in overt disease is summarised in Figure 2. Since the earliest descriptions of ARVC, it was recognised that there was loss of myocytes within the right ventricle and replacement by fibrous and fatty tissue [22]. This may be due to myocyte apoptosis resulting from abnormalities in cell signalling due to the disruption of the desmosomes and connexins [23] resulting from the combination of host genetic and environmental factors. Some histologic and imaging studies have identified areas of inflammation within the myocardium in ARVC supporting a possible role for an inflammatory process in the development and progression of the disease [24,25]. There has been debate about whether some sporadic cases may have more predominant virally triggered inflammatory pathogenesis or whether the inflammation is simply a marker of a more active phase of the disease [26] or even a reaction to cell death. Whether inflammatory cytokine release during exercise acts as a trigger for myocardial inflammation or whether mechanical stress alone is the trigger for disease progression in ARVC is unknown. There

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 4/9

379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443

print & web 4C=FPO

4

D. Prior, A. La Gerche

Figure 2 The balance between genetic and environmental factors such as exercise in the phenotypic expression of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Individuals with high genetic risk may express the disease with little or no exercise contribution. Individuals with lower genetic risk may require more intense of prolonged exercise to express ARVC. Reproduced from La Gerche [55].

is some support for a connection between pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute RV damage following prolonged intense exercise [27]. The concept of an exercise and genetic interaction has also been appraised in pre-clinical models. Animal studies in plakoglobin deficient mice have provided supporting information about the impact of exercise on development and progression of disease in ARVC [28]. Kirchhof et al. studied heterozygous plakoglobin-deficient mice, some of which undertook daily swim training. Whilst the sedentary plakoglobin-deficient mice developed gradual enlargement of the right ventricle over 10 months, when compared to wild-type mice, the trained mice developed more severe RV enlargement after only 6 months and this was associated with a high rate of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia of right ventricular origin. This parallels clinical observations in humans. In another mouse model of ARVC, phenotypic expression of a PKP2 mutation was only seen in animals who were subjected to an 8-week endurance swim training protocol and not in sedentary mice [29]. Sedentary mice did not develop abnormalities on CMR independent of whether they expressed the PKP2 mutation. In contrast, control mice who exercised maintained a normal right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), whereas RVEF was reduced in the endurance trained carriers of the mutation. These animal studies support the concept that in the presence of an ARVC causing mutation, exercise is a trigger associated with phenotypic expression and more rapid progression of the ARVC phenotype.

Similar to some human studies, pre-clinical models also support the concept that more extreme exercise may cause ARVC-like changes even in the absence of a genetic predisposition. In a study using male Wistar rats without known arrhythmogenic gene mutations, vigorous running exercise alone produced fibrosis in the right ventricle and atria resulting in a predisposition to RV arrhythmias with programmed electrical stimulation [30]. These changes were not observed in rats that did not undergo vigorous exercise training.

ARVC as a Cause of Sudden Cardiac Death During Exercise Whereas the original case series describing ARVC identified it as a cause of ventricular arrhythmias and right heart failure [22], a subsequent post-mortem study identified ARVC as an important cause of sudden cardiac death in young people with no clinical history of arrhythmias [31]. The same group from the Veneto region of Italy later identified ARVC as an important cause of sudden cardiac death during exercise [1], associated with a five-fold increase in risk when compared to sedentary individuals with the same disease. Reports from other parts of the world support ARVC as an important cause of SCD during exercise [32], although the frequency of this entity was lower in non-Italian locations with other inherited and acquired diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, coronary anomalies and myocarditis being more prominent [33–35]. In a Canadian series of 74 cases of SCD, there were no cases due to ARVC [36].

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 5/9

5

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573

In some countries, screening of young athletes for conditions associated with SCD during exercise has been recommended and adopted [37,38]. Whilst there have been no randomised trials of this approach, longitudinal data from Italy show a fall in the rate of SCD during exercise after the introduction of systematic screening [39]. Perhaps surprisingly, although ARVC was a dominant cause of SCD prescreening, only a minority of athletes were excluded from participation due to a diagnosis of ARVC as a result of screening.

minority (12%) had a desmosomal gene mutation, suggesting that an ARVC-like phenotype can occur in athletes in the absence of a disease-causing mutation. Thus, endurance exercise appears to accelerate the progression and expression of ARVC in those with desmosomal mutations in a dosedependent fashion and potentially may cause ARVC in those without a clear genetic predisposition if the exercise exposure is sufficiently large (Figure 2). This has implications for management of genotype positive/phenotype negative carriers and those with phenotype positive disease.

Effect of Competitive Exercise on Progression of ARVC

Exercise-Induced ARVC

Whilst the role of exercise as a trigger for SCD has been long understood, more recent data suggest that exercise is an important modulator of the phenotypic expression, progression and prognosis of ARVC. It was observed that in carriers of mutations in ARVC genes, symptoms occurred at a younger age (around 10 years earlier) in those undertaking endurance exercise when compared to sedentary individuals and they were more likely to have ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure than those who did the least amount of exercise [2,4]. Endurance exercise was also associated with a higher rate of developing positive task force criteria for ARVC. Imaging studies in both patients with ARVC and mutation-positive family members revealed that left and right ventricular function was reduced in athletes when compared to non-athletes [3]. One (1) smaller study examined the intensity of dynamic physical activity in the 10 years preceding a diagnosis of definite ARVC and subsequently followed these individuals for a mean of 6.8 years [40]. They found that those with the highest intensity of exercise were more likely to have an arrhythmic event or to develop RVEF ,35% than those with a history of moderate exercise, who were in turn more likely than those who were inactive. Similarly, in a cohort of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and mutation positive family members, a history of high intensity exercise was a strong predictor of life-threatening arrhythmias with an eight-fold increase in risk over a median of 4.2 years follow-up [41]. Thus, presymptomatic genetic diagnosis may provide important information on which to base advice regarding exercise for gene mutation carriers. It is reasonable to argue that those individuals with disease-causing mutations should be counselled against endurance and competitive exercise to prevent disease development and this is reflected in recent European guidelines [42]. When a cohort of endurance athletes with right ventricular arrhythmias were examined for the presence of mutations in the five most common genes known to cause ARVC, those with recognised mutations had worse RV function, but had engaged in less exercise than those without mutations, thereby supporting a role for exercise in progression of ARVC in gene positive athletes [6]. Furthermore, several endurance athletes met criteria for ARVC but only a small

Some endurance athletes have been reported to develop a syndrome of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the right side of the heart [5], sometimes accompanied by abnormalities of right ventricular structure and function, present either at rest [43] or elucidated with exercise testing [44]. It has been suggested that this entity is simply a cohort of unrecognised cases of ARVC. However, as noted above, genetic testing in one group of athletes with right ventricular arrhythmias revealed a lower-than expected prevalence of recognised gene mutations than would be seen if all cases in this cohort were simply due to due to unrecognised ARVC, rather than a distinct exercise-induced variant [6]. Approaching the same question from a different direction, in a study of patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARVC, patients in whom a desmosomal mutation was not identified (termed ‘geneelusive’ by the investigators) had a strong association with very high intensity exercise [45]. In fact, 100% of patients without a recognised desmosomal mutation (‘gene-elusive’ ARVC patients) were endurance athletes vs only 70% of the gene-positive group. They had a lower rate of a positive family history and were more likely to present at age #25 years, particularly those with the greatest amount of premorbid exercise. These findings support the presence of an exercise-induced ARVC phenotype, particularly with endurance exercise. As mentioned previously, this concept is also supported by the findings of Benito et al. [30] in which an ARVC phenotype could be elicited by vigorous exercise in rats without a known genetic predisposition. On the other hand, it is clear that only a minority of highly-trained athletes are affected despite similar exercise training exposure. It is also possible that these individuals carry a mutation in a gene which is not expressed phenotypically unless subjected to the environmental trigger of endurance exercise. The animal work of Cruz et al. would support this hypothesis [29]. This raises the possibility that there are other modifying factors, both genetic and environmental. The current model of inherited ARVC is that of a monogenic disorder, but it is also possible that a combination of genetic modifiers creates the condition in which exercise may promote myocyte injury and resulting arrhythmias. Other environmental influences such as concurrent illness, particularly whilst training, is another plausible modifier.

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 6/9

6

639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703

Exercise Prescription in ARVC Because high level exercise is known to accelerate the progression of ARVC and increase the risk of sudden death, individuals with the diagnosis need clear advice about how much exercise is safe. It would seem prudent to provide advice both to those with a definite diagnosis of ARVC and to those who carry a mutation known to cause ARVC. Unfortunately, there is little systematic evidence to guide this and most advice is based upon expert opinion. Advice to only exercise moderately will have a different meaning to a former professional athlete when compared to a sedentary individual. The greatest advances in our evidence base for exercise advice have come from studies of ARVC registries at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore and from Oslo in Norway. James et al. observed that exercise restriction after the diagnosis of ARVC had a direct impact on clinical outcomes [2]. In dividing exercise exposure into quartiles, they observed that the highest rates of life-threatening arrhythmias occurred in those patients who performed the most exercise before and after diagnosis [2]. However, in those who reduced their exercise from the highest quartile to the lower quartiles the risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) fell from 75% to 12%. To some extent the reverse was also true. In those who exercised less, the arrhythmias tended to be more common if patients increased exercise to the highest quartile after diagnosis (from 10% to 29%) although this difference was not significant [2]. More recently, Sawant and colleagues from Johns Hopkins enabled clinicians to be a little more specific with advice regarding exercise dose by studying 10 extended families with plakophilin mutations [46]. Endurance athletes were disproportionately represented amongst those family members meeting Task Force Criteria for a diagnosis of phenotype positive ARVC (67% vs. 23%, p=0.03). Similarly, of six family members to experience at least one bout of VT/VF, all six (100%) were endurance athletes whereas endurance athletes only comprised 41% of those without VT/VF (p=0.02). Importantly, in seven family members who performed exercise at or below American Heart Association guidelines of 150 minutes/week of low to moderate intensity, only one met Task Force Criteria and none developed ventricular arrhythmias. This study was of modest size, but does provide some confidence on which to recommend that people can afford to continue to exercise to a modest degree whilst undergoing regular follow-up to monitor disease progression. The Norwegian group of Lie et al. assessed the relative effects of exercise and intensity and their relationship to disease progression in patients with ARVC and genopositive family members [47]. They observed more prevalent ventricular arrhythmias in patients performing exercise of greater intensity (74% vs. 20% performed .6 METS, p,0.001) and volume (65%, vs 30% exercised .2.5 hours/ week, p,0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, intensity

D. Prior, A. La Gerche

rather than duration was independently associated with arrhythmias. This provides further support for recommendations to our patients that exercise should be limited to less than 2.5 hours per week but even more importantly that intense exercise should be avoided. A further question relates to exercise in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs). Whilst a more liberal approach to participation is supported by observations of few serious arrhythmias and no deaths in competitive and recreational athletes with devices [48,49], there has been concern that a more permissive approach should not be extended to athletes with ARVC because of the risk of progression. In support of this, Wang et al. found that those with ARVC who reduced exercise dose (a combination of intensity and duration) experienced the greatest reduction in arrhythmia events [50]. Intriguingly, the group that experienced the greatest benefit from detraining was the ‘gene elusive’ patients and those in whom the device was implanted for primary prevention. One might extrapolate to conclude that those with exercise-induced ARVC (the majority of gene negative ARVC patients) at a relatively early stage (before arrhythmias) are the group who particular focus on detraining should be directed. Currently, there is no research relating to weight or strength training in patients with ARVC and in the absence of evidence we tend to be conservative. However, there is at least some physiological rationale to speculate that weight training may be well tolerated by patients with ARVC. As discussed earlier in this review, the mechanistic postulate underpinning the association between exercise and ARVC relates to the excess in ventricular wall stress that occurs during exercise. This is particularly influenced by the volume load and ‘stretch’ of exercise that results in both acute load and long-term remodelling in the form of cardiac dilation. Strength training causes little volume load and little longterm remodelling. The Morganroth hypothesis argued that endurance exercise caused a volume load and ventricular dilation whereas strength training caused a pressure load and resulting hypertrophy [51]. However, multiple intervention studies have failed to demonstrate significant remodelling with strength training [52]. Thus, there is reason to argue that strength training causes little or no acute

Table 1 Pragmatic exercise advice in ARVC and in gene positive carriers. 1. Endurance exercise should be avoided. 2. Exercise should be limited to less than 2.5 hours per week 3. Intense exercise should be avoided. Patients should be encouraged to exercise well below ventilatory threshold. Simple guidance like exercising at a level where you can maintain conversation may be useful. 4. Moderate static strength-based exercise may be reasonable.

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 7/9

7

769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833

print & web 4C=FPO

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Figure 3 The complex relationship between exercise, ARVC, sudden death and ventricular arrhythmias. Competitive and endurance exercise accelerates the expression and progression of ARVC leading to ventricular arrhythmias and RV dysfunction at a younger age. Abbreviations: ARVC, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; RV, right ventricular.

haemodynamic stress, such that it would not be expected to exacerbate ARVC. In trying to summate the evidence from the observational studies discussed above and our own theories on the role of exercise in ARVC pathogenesis we have created pragmatic recommendations for exercise (Table 1). The most recent expert consensus from the Heart Rhythm Society recommends counselling individuals who are genotype positivephenotype negative that competitive or frequent high-intensity endurance exercise is associated with increased likelihood of developing ARVC and ventricular arrhythmias. The advice for individuals with a diagnosis of ARVC is that they should not participate in competitive or frequent high-intensity endurance exercise [53]. An international task force on treatment of ARVC made an additional class IIa recommendation that patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC should be restricted from participation in athletic activities, with the possible exception of recreational low-intensity sports [54]. The most recent European guidelines regarding management of athletes with cardiomyopathies state that patients with ARVC should not compete in competitive sports and extend the same recommendation to those with a desmosomal mutation, but without overt disease [42].

Apart from exercise restriction, management of patients with ARVC will include stratification of risk for SCD based on clinical, electrophysiological and imaging parameters. Genetic counselling and screening of relatives remain important components of management. Treatment of arrhythmias may include antiarrhythmic drug therapy, electrophysiology study, VT ablation and implantation of a defibrillator [54]. In those with right heart failure, medications including diuretics, mineralocorticoid receptors antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers and nitrates are all considered reasonable [53]. In those with severe arrhythmias or right heart failure, heart transplantation may be an option. The choice of treatment options should be individualised.

Conclusion Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy interacts with exercise in multiple ways which are all of clinical importance (Figure 3). It is an important cause of SCD during exercise in the young. Phenotypic expression and severity of ARVC are worsened by exercise, particularly endurance

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 Q3893 894 895 896 897 898

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 8/9

8

899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963

exercise. Extreme endurance exercise has been implicated in the development of and exercise-induced ARVC syndrome, even in the absence of gene mutations recognised to cause ARVC. For these reasons, advice regarding exercise restriction forms a major component of the management of this condition.

References [1] Corrado D, Basso C, Rizzoli G, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1959–63. [2] James CA, Bhonsale A, Tichnell C, Murray B, Russell SD, Tandri H, et al. Exercise increases age-related penetrance and arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated desmosomal mutation carriers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1290–7. [3] Saberniak J, Hasselberg NE, Borgquist R, Platonov PG, Sarvari SI, Smith HJ, et al. Vigorous physical activity impairs myocardial function in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and in mutation positive family members. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:1337–44. [4] Ruwald AC, Marcus F, Estes 3rd NA, Link M, McNitt S, Polonsky B, et al. Association of competitive and recreational sport participation with cardiac events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from the North American multidisciplinary study of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1735–43. [5] Heidbuchel H, Hoogsteen J, Fagard R, Vanhees L, Ector H, Willems R, et al. High prevalence of right ventricular involvement in endurance athletes with ventricular arrhythmias. Role of an electrophysiologic study in risk stratification. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1473–80. [6] La Gerche A, Robberecht C, Kuiperi C, Nuyens D, Willems R, de Ravel T, et al. Lower than expected desmosomal gene mutation prevalence in endurance athletes with complex ventricular arrhythmias of right ventricular origin. Heart 2010;96:1268–74. [7] La Gerche A, Burns AT, Mooney DJ, Inder WJ, Taylor AJ, Bogaert J, et al. Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes. Eur Heart J 2012;33:998–1006. [8] Heidbuchel H, Prior DL, La Gerche A. Ventricular arrhythmias associated with long-term endurance sports: what is the evidence? Br J Sports Med 2012;46(Suppl 1):i44–50. [9] Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, Berul C, Brugada R, Calkins H, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies: this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Europace 2011;13:1077–109. [10] Fressart V, Duthoit G, Donal E, Probst V, Deharo JC, Chevalier P, et al. Desmosomal gene analysis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: spectrum of mutations and clinical impact in practice. Europace 2010;12:861–8. [11] Cox MG, van der Zwaag PA, van der Werf C, van der Smagt JJ, Noorman M, Bhuiyan ZA, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: pathogenic desmosome mutations in indexpatients predict outcome of family screening: Dutch arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy genotype-phenotype followup study. Circulation 2011;123:2690–700. [12] Rigato I, Bauce B, Rampazzo A, Zorzi A, Pilichou K, Mazzotti E, et al. Compound and digenic heterozygosity predicts lifetime arrhythmic outcome and sudden cardiac death in desmosomal gene-related arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013;6:533–42. [13] Bhonsale A, Groeneweg JA, James CA, Dooijes D, Tichnell C, Jongbloed JD, et al. Impact of genotype on clinical course in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated mutation carriers. Eur Heart J 2015;36:847–55. [14] Santangeli P, Tung R, Xue Y, Chung FP, Lin YJ, Di Biase L, et al. Outcomes of catheter ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy without background implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: a multicenter international ventricular tachycardia registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2019;5:55–65. [15] James CA, Calkins H. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: evidence for progression increases. Eur Heart J 2019. [16] Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, Bauce B, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria. Eur Heart J 2010;31:806–14.

D. Prior, A. La Gerche

[17] D’Ascenzi F, Pelliccia A, Corrado D, Cameli M, Curci V, Alvino F, et al. Right ventricular remodelling induced by exercise training in competitive athletes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:301–7. [18] Brosnan M, La Gerche A, Kalman J, Lo W, Fallon K, MacIsaac A, et al. Comparison of frequency of significant electrocardiographic abnormalities in endurance versus nonendurance athletes. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1567–73. [19] Brosnan M, Claessen G, Heidbuchel H, Prior D, La Gerche A. Right precordial t-wave inversion in healthy endurance athletes can be explained by lateral displacement of the cardiac apex. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2015;1-2:84–91. [20] Prior D. Differentiating athlete’s heart from cardiomyopathies - the right side. Heart Lung Circ 2018;27:1063–71. [21] La Gerche A, Heidbuchel H, Burns AT, Mooney DJ, Taylor AJ, Pfluger HB, et al. Disproportionate exercise load and remodeling of the athlete’s right ventricle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:974–81. [22] Marcus FI, Fontaine GH, Guiraudon G, Frank R, Laurenceau JL, Malergue C, et al. Right ventricular dysplasia: a report of 24 adult cases. Circulation 1982;65:384–98. [23] Que D, Yang P, Song X, Liu L. Traditional vs. genetic pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Europace 2015;17: 1770–6. [24] Campuzano O, Alcalde M, Iglesias A, Barahona-Dussault C, SarquellaBrugada G, Benito B, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: severe structural alterations are associated with inflammation. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:1077–83. [25] Martins D, Ovaert C, Khraiche D, Boddaert N, Bonnet D, Raimondi F. Myocardial inflammation detected by cardiac MRI in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: A paediatric case series. Int J Cardiol 2018;271:81–6. [26] Patrianakos AP, Protonotarios N, Nyktari E, Pagonidis K, Tsatsopoulou A, Parthenakis FI, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia and troponin release. Myocarditis or the “hot phase” of the disease? Int J Cardiol 2012;157:e26–8. [27] La Gerche A, Inder WJ, Roberts TJ, Brosnan MJ, Heidbuchel H, Prior DL. Relationship between inflammatory cytokines and indices of cardiac dysfunction following intense endurance exercise. PLoS One 2015;10: e0130031. [28] Kirchhof P, Fabritz L, Zwiener M, Witt H, Schafers M, Zellerhoff S, et al. Age- and training-dependent development of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in heterozygous plakoglobin-deficient mice. Circulation 2006;114:1799–806. [29] Cruz FM, Sanz-Rosa D, Roche-Molina M, Garcia-Prieto J, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Pizarro G, et al. Exercise triggers ARVC phenotype in mice expressing a disease-causing mutated version of human plakophilin-2. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1438–50. [30] Benito B, Gay-Jordi G, Serrano-Mollar A, Guasch E, Shi Y, Tardif JC, et al. Cardiac arrhythmogenic remodeling in a rat model of long-term intensive exercise training. Circulation 2011;123:13–22. [31] Thiene G, Nava A, Corrado D, Rossi L, Pennelli N. Right ventricular cardiomyopathy and sudden death in young people. N Engl J Med 1988;318:129–33. [32] Holst AG, Winkel BG, Theilade J, Kristensen IB, Thomsen JL, Ottesen GL, et al. Incidence and etiology of sports-related sudden cardiac death in Denmark–implications for preparticipation screening. Heart Rhythm 2010;7:1365–71. [33] Maron BJ, Doerer JJ, Haas TS, Tierney DM, Mueller FO. Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980-2006. Circulation 2009;119:1085–92. [34] de Noronha SV, Sharma S, Papadakis M, Desai S, Whyte G, Sheppard MN. Aetiology of sudden cardiac death in athletes in the United Kingdom: a pathological study. Heart 2009;95:1409–14. [35] Bagnall RD, Weintraub RG, Ingles J, Duflou J, Yeates L, Lam L, et al. A prospective study of sudden cardiac death among children and young adults. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2441–52. [36] Landry CH, Connelly KA, Dorian P. Cardiac arrest during competitive sports. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1464–5. [37] Corrado D, Pelliccia A, Bjornstad HH, Vanhees L, Biffi A, Borjesson M, et al. Cardiovascular pre-participation screening of young competitive athletes for prevention of sudden death: proposal for a common European protocol. Consensus Statement of the Study Group of Sport Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005;26:516–24.

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028

HLC3067_proof ■ 26 December 2019 ■ 9/9

Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068

[38] Maron BJ, Levine BD, Washington RL, Baggish AL, Kovacs RJ, Maron MS. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 2: preparticipation screening for cardiovascular disease in competitive athletes: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2356–61. [39] Corrado D, Basso C, Pavei A, Michieli P, Schiavon M, Thiene G. Trends in sudden cardiovascular death in young competitive athletes after implementation of a preparticipation screening program. JAMA 2006;296:1593– 601. [40] Ruiz Salas A, Barrera Cordero A, Navarro-Arce I, Jimenez Navarro M, Garcia Pinilla JM, Cabrera Bueno F, et al. Impact of dynamic physical exercise on high-risk definite arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018;29:1523–9. [41] Lie OH, Rootwelt-Norberg C, Dejgaard LA, Leren IS, Stokke MK, Edvardsen T, et al. Prediction of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: a primary prevention cohort study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1377–86. [42] Pelliccia A, Solberg EE, Papadakis M, Adami PE, Biffi A, Caselli S, et al. Recommendations for participation in competitive and leisure time sport in athletes with cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and pericarditis: position statement of the Sport Cardiology Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur Heart J 2019;40:19–33. [43] Ector J, Ganame J, van der Merwe N, Adriaenssens B, Pison L, Willems R, et al. Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction in endurance athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias: a quantitative angiographic assessment. Eur Heart J 2007;28:345–53. [44] La Gerche A, Claessen G, Dymarkowski S, Voigt JU, De Buck F, Vanhees L, et al. Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction is associated with ventricular arrhythmias in endurance athletes. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1998–2010. [45] Sawant AC, Bhonsale A, te Riele AS, Tichnell C, Murray B, Russell SD, et al. Exercise has a disproportionate role in the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy in patients without desmosomal mutations. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e001471.

9

[46] Sawant AC, Te Riele AS, Tichnell C, Murray B, Bhonsale A, Tandri H, et al. Safety of American Heart Association-recommended minimum exercise for desmosomal mutation carriers. Heart Rhythm 2016;13:199–207. [47] Lie OH, Dejgaard LA, Saberniak J, Rootwelt C, Stokke MK, Edvardsen T, et al. Harmful effects of exercise intensity and exercise duration in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4:744–53. [48] Lampert R, Olshansky B, Heidbuchel H, Lawless C, Saarel E, Ackerman M, et al. Safety of sports for athletes with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a prospective, multinational registry. Circulation 2013;127:2021–30. [49] Heidbuchel H, Willems R, Jordaens L, Olshansky B, Carre F, Lozano IF, et al. Intensive recreational athletes in the prospective multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry: Results from the European cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019;26:764–75. [50] Wang W, Orgeron G, Tichnell C, Murray B, Crosson J, Monfredi O, et al. Impact of exercise restriction on arrhythmic risk among patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J AmHeart Assoc 2018;7. [51] Morganroth J, Maron BJ, Henry WL, Epstein SE. Comparative left ventricular dimensions in trained athletes. Ann Intern Med 1975;82:521–4. [52] Haykowsky MJ, Samuel TJ, Nelson MD, La Gerche A. Athlete’s heart: is the Morganroth hypothesis obsolete? Heart Lung Circ 2018;27:1037–41. [53] Towbin JA, McKenna WJ, Abrams DJ, Ackerman MJ, Calkins H, Darrieux FCC, et al. 2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2019;16:e301–72. [54] Corrado D, Wichter T, Link MS, Hauer R, Marchlinski F, Anastasakis A, et al. Treatment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/ dysplasia: an international task force consensus statement. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3227–37. [55] La Gerche A. Defining the interaction between exercise and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:128–31.

Please cite this article in press as: Prior D, La Gerche A. Exercise and Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Heart, Lung and Circulation (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.12.007

1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108