Accepted Manuscript Exploration of rice protein hydrolysates and peptides with special reference to antioxidant potential: Computational derived approaches for bio-activity determination Sapna Rani, Km Pooja, Gaurav Kumar Pal PII:
S0924-2244(17)30728-8
DOI:
10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.013
Reference:
TIFS 2274
To appear in:
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Received Date: 12 November 2017 Revised Date:
6 May 2018
Accepted Date: 12 July 2018
Please cite this article as: Rani, S., Pooja, K., Pal, G.K., Exploration of rice protein hydrolysates and peptides with special reference to antioxidant potential: Computational derived approaches for bioactivity determination, Trends in Food Science & Technology (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.013. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Abstract
2
Background Rice processing by-products derived proteins have been well acknowledged as rich
4
sources of structurally diverse compounds (especially proteins) possess various health-related
5
benefits along with a great therapeutic potential for the treatment and prevention of various
6
diseases.
7
Scope and approach
RI PT
3
In this paper, we have reviewed and explored the possibilities for adapting the
9
sustainable valorisation of rice processing by-products to generate bioactive hydrolysates and
10
peptides for food and biotechnological industries. The role of computational derived
11
approaches for the production and applications of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides from
12
the parent protein has also been explored.
13
Key findings and conclusions
M AN U
SC
8
Based on the emerging evidence of potential health benefits, the antioxidant potential
15
of rice protein hydrolysate and peptides has been reviewed. The present review mainly
16
highlights the recent research on rice proteins derived bioactive compounds for food and
17
biotechnological applications using computational derived approaches with special reference
18
to antioxidant activity. The safety, bioavailability and technological problems (towards the
19
incorporation into food products) to deliver the bioactive peptides on the specific target has
20
been discussed. The major opportunities and challenges are discussed for inspiring
21
researchers/industries to investigate the critical problems that are responsible for preventing
22
the utilization of these approaches for the development of functional food and nutraceutical
23
products.
24
Keywords: Rice processing by-products; protein hydrolysates; computational approaches;
25
bioactive rice peptides; functional food products
AC C
EP
TE D
14
1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Exploration of rice protein hydrolysates and peptides with special reference to
2
antioxidant potential: Computational derived approaches for bio-activity determination
3
Sapna Rani1, Km Pooja2,*, Gaurav Kumar Pal3,*
4
Dairy Microbiology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
6 7
2
Department of Botany, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut-250004, Uttar Pradesh, India 3
SC
8 9
RI PT
1
5
Department of Microbiology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut250005, Uttar Pradesh, India
M AN U
10 11 12
Email-
14
[email protected] (Sapna Rani)
15
[email protected] (Km Pooja)
16
[email protected];
[email protected] (Gaurav Kumar Pal)
17
* = corresponding authors
19
EP
AC C
18
TE D
13
20
Corresponding Address:
21
Department of Microbiology,
22
Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology,
23
Meerut-250005, Uttar Pradesh, India
24
Mobile: 91+ 9482382610
25
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26
1. Introduction Agricultural processing by-products derived bioactive molecules are considered as an
28
emerging field in the present biotechnological era among the researchers. From many years,
29
agricultural processing by-products especially rice by-products are considered as undervalued
30
substrates due to the complicated treatment and disposal issues (Galanakis, 2012). Nowadays,
31
the demands for sustainability in food and agricultural sectors led to their valorisation as a
32
source of functional and bioactive compounds. The utilisation of bioactive compounds
33
became more popular and acceptable worldwide with increasing scientific knowledge, social
34
awareness, along with a broad spectrum of biotechnological validation. In recent years,
35
naturally occurring bioactive compounds are being preferred due to their easy accessibility
36
and rarer side effect for the development of nutraceuticals and functional food products
37
(Galanakis, 2012, 2013).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
27
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a leading staple food crop worldwide. It is a major food
39
source for approximately more than one-half of the world’s population, particularly in Asian
40
countries (Pooja & Rani, 2017). The global annual production of the rice estimated
41
approximately 610 million metric tons (milled rice basis) (Sereewatthanawut et al., 2008;
42
Wang, Chen, Fu, Li, & Wei, 2017). It is cultivated in every zone of more than hundred
43
countries, except Antarctica (Amagliani, O’Regan, Kelly, & O’Mahony, 2017a, 2017b). It is
44
a second most grown dietary staple cereal crop after wheat, globally (Fabian & Ju, 2011). As
45
a staple food, rice could be able to fulfill the requirement of essential and unique
46
micronutrients such as vitamins, minerals, and phenolic compounds that have potent
47
antioxidant activity. Rice is rich in a specific group of flavonoids and other unique
48
compounds that may have significant free radical scavenging activities (Zhou, Canning, &
49
Sun, 2013).
AC C
EP
TE D
38
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Due to enormous production of the rice, it (rice milling processing industries)
51
produces vast quantities of rice by-products (Sereewatthanawut et al., 2008). In most of the
52
developing countries, rice by-products are yet not to be efficiently utilized for human
53
consumption. Usually, rice by-products regularly used as an animal feed ingredient or
54
discarded as waste (Fabian & Ju, 2011). It can be used to provide a considerable proportion
55
of the protein intake for millions of people.
RI PT
50
Rice bran is the outer component of raw rice that is obtained as a by-product during
57
the rice milling process and has 12-15% protein content. It is a vital underutilised by-product
58
of rice milling with a global potential of 29.3 million tons annually (Sharif, Butt, Anjum, &
59
Khan, 2014; Sohail, Rakha, Butt, Iqbal, & Rashid, 2016). The protein digestibility and
60
biological value of rice have been reported to be higher than those of the other major cereals
61
(such as wheat, corn, etc.). Rice bran derived proteins usually have a high-quality and
62
generally regarded as a hypoallergenic protein that may be useful in infant food formulations.
63
It is also well reported that these proteins have various biological activities (Wang et al.,
64
2017). A lot of research studies suggesting that rice proteins and its derived hydrolysates and
65
specific peptide fractions have strong biological and functional activities such as anti-
66
oxidative, anti-hypertensive, anti-obesity and so on (Cheetangdee & Benjakul, 2015; Fang et
67
al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Yan, Huang, Sun, Jiang, & Wu, 2015; Zhao, Xiong, et al., 2012;
68
Zhou et al., 2013). Therefore, rice can be utilized as a fascinating, cost-effective, and
69
potential source of proteins for the development of protein-enriched ingredients for the
70
formulation of nutritional enriched food or drink products.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
56
71
Bioactive peptides are specific and small protein fragments that are inactive within the
72
sequence of their parent protein. Enzymatic hydrolysis commonly releases bioactive
73
hydrolysates and peptides. These peptides are 2-20 amino acids in size and typically possess
74
specific amino acid sequences, mainly comprised of hydrophobic groups in addition to
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 75
proline, arginine, and lysine (Pal & Suresh, 2016, 2017). However, there is scanty
76
information about the antioxidant activities of rice bran protein and its hydrolysates. For a
77
better understanding of antioxidant activities of hydrolysate from rice bran protein, the
78
peptides contributing to those activities need to be examined (Wang et al., 2017). There has been growing interest in the use of computational derived approaches for
80
screening of bioactive peptides from the novel substrates. The screening for biological
81
activity containing peptides or hydrolysates from novel substrates using conventional
82
methods is an expensive and time-consuming process as compared with in silico analysis
83
(Pooja & Rani, 2017; Rani & Pooja, 2018; Rani, Pooja, & Kumar, 2017). However, this
84
process can be simplified using computational approaches such as BLAST, BIOPEP,
85
PeptideRanker, Pepdrew, Pepcalc, and ToxinPred, etc. (Altschul et al., 2005; Dimitrov,
86
Bangov, Flower, & Doytchinova, 2014; Gupta et al., 2013; Piotr Minkiewicz, Dziuba,
87
Iwaniak, Dziuba, & Darewicz, 2008; Mooney, Haslam, Holton, Pollastri, & Shields, 2013;
88
Mooney, Haslam, Pollastri, & Shields, 2012).
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
79
The antioxidants play a vital role to reduce oxidative processes in the food
90
commodities and in human body. In food commodities, antioxidant can retards the protein
91
oxidation, peroxidation of lipid, secondary product formation during lipid peroxidation, and
92
also helps to maintain the flavour, texture, and colour of the food product during storage. The
93
natural antioxidants (such as vitamin C, tocopherols, rosemary, tea extracts) have been well
94
known as alternatives to synthetic antioxidants (Sila & Bougatef, 2016). The potential
95
antioxidant activity of the protein hydrolysates and peptides derived from various animals,
96
plants and other sources (such as milk, soy, egg, fish, etc.) have also been demonstrated
97
(Samaranayaka & Li-Chan, 2011; Pal & Suresh, 2016).
AC C
EP
89
98
Therefore, this article emphasized the current knowledge about rice protein derived
99
bioactive hydrolysates and peptides with a particular accent on the exploration of bioactive
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100
peptides using computational approaches and their possible use as natural antioxidants in
101
food products.
102
2. Distribution of proteins in rice The yield of utilisable protein is higher for rice as compared to wheat, due to the
104
superior quality of rice proteins. Most of the protein found in rice grain is usually present in
105
the bran. These are the high value nutritionally rich protein that contains ~10-15% of the total
106
protein content of the rice (Chandi & Sogi, 2007). These rice bran proteins are mostly storage
107
proteins (Glutelin, globulin, and prolamin) (Fabian & Ju, 2011). On the basis of the solubility
108
characteristics, the rice protein can be categorized into four main groups. The four main rice
109
proteins are albumin (water soluble), globulin (salt soluble), glutelin (alkali/acid soluble), and
110
prolamin (alcohol soluble) (Fig 1). Rice proteins are mainly found in the form of storage
111
organelles (Amagliani et al., 2017b). These rice protein components have unique gelling and
112
emulsifying properties. There is limited research on the preparation of rice protein derived
113
bioactive hydrolysates/peptides and their functional properties (Arsa & Theerakulkait, 2018;
114
Phongthai, D’Amico, Schoenlechner, Homthawornchoo, & Rawdkuen, 2018; Pooja & Rani,
115
2017; Pooja, Rani, & Prakash, 2017; Senaphan et al., 2018; Wang, Chen, Fu, Li, & Wei,
116
2017; Zhou et al., 2013). The protein content of rice is influenced by factors such as
117
management and cultural practices, climate and genotype. The proper handling and
118
processing of the rice processing by-products may provide high nutritional value and could
119
find a potential application in the functional food industries (Amagliani et al., 2017a).
120
3. Development of the rice bran derived hydrolysate and peptides
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
103
121
Rice processing by-products has gained much attention as potential biologically active
122
hydrolysate and peptides due to the high availability of rice processing by-products (Pooja &
123
Rani, 2017; Sharif et al., 2014; Udenigwe, 2016). Rice processing by-product derived
124
hydrolysates/peptides are specific protein fragments that play a significant role in preventing
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the cardiovascular, and nervous diseases (Wang et al., 2017). Most of the peptides are
126
inactive within the parent sequences and become active after release from the parent
127
sequences. Peptides usually contain 2-20 amino acids, and their biological and functional
128
activities are based on their amino acid position and composition (Pal & Suresh, 2016, 2017).
129
The bioactivity of released hydrolysates and peptides also depends on the primary sequence
130
of protein and specificity of the enzymes used. It is also well known that structural feature of
131
peptides mostly influences their biological and functional activities profiles. The presence of
132
tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, proline, valine, leucine, lysine, isoleucine, and arginine
133
in peptides strongly influences the binding of peptides with angiotensin converting enzyme
134
(ACE) (Harnedy & FitzGerald, 2012). The activity of antimicrobial peptides is associated
135
with positively charged residues. The radical scavenging activity is associated with histidine,
136
leucine, tyrosine, methionine, and cysteine amino acid residues (Pal and Suresh 2017).
137
Hydrophobic amino acids (Proline and hydroxyproline) appear to play a role in the inhibition
138
of lipid peroxidation (Harnedy & FitzGerald, 2012). The most common methods used for the
139
development of hydrolysates and peptides are discussed (Fig 2).
140
3.1 Chemical methods
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
125
The bioactive hydrolysates and peptides can be generated by chemical hydrolysis.
142
This process was classified into two types: acid hydrolysis and alkali hydrolysis process.
143
These hydrolysis methods are cost-effective, simple operative and required short hydrolysis
144
time. Acid hydrolysis process is commonly carried out with 6 M HCl under high-temperature
145
conditions (110-120°C). Alkaline hydrolysis process carried out with a strong alkali (sodium
146
hydroxide or potassium hydroxide) in water at high temperatures (130-180°C). Moreover,
147
these methods are usually not acceptable for preparing the bioactive peptides intended for the
148
application in the development of functional food ingredients (Anal, Noomhorm, &
149
Vongsawasdi, 2013; Pal & Suresh, 2016).
AC C
EP
141
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 150
3.2. Biological methods In biological methods, the bioactive hydrolysates and peptides are majorly released
152
from rice processing by-products using exogenous enzymes, endogenous enzymes,
153
fermentation, and gastrointestinal digestion process (Chen et al., 2013). However, enzymatic
154
hydrolysis is the most widely used method to improve the functional and nutritional
155
characteristics of protein hydrolysates and peptides. Enzymatic hydrolysis is the leading
156
process for the production of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides from rice proteins. The rice
157
proteins are gradually degraded into the low molecular weight peptides in the range of 0.2-4.0
158
kDa during the enzymatic hydrolysis. The molecular weight of hydrolysates and peptides is
159
one of the most critical parameter to produce bioactive peptides. It is well known and
160
extensively accepted among the researchers that low molecular weight peptides can be easily
161
absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and cardiovascular circulation system and finally exhibit
162
physiological-regulating properties (Pooja, Rani & Prakash, 2017). The commercial available
163
food grade and non-food grade proteolytic enzymes from microbes such as alcalase,
164
flavourzyme, protamex, proteinase K, metalloproteases, serine-protease; from plants papain,
165
bromelain, ficin; from animal α-chymotrypsin, neutrase, trypsin, etc. have been widely used
166
for the preparation of rice protein derived hydrolysates and peptides with functional
167
activities. Exogenous enzymes have been preferred due to better control of hydrolysis with an
168
optimum degree of hydrolysis and time to obtain the consistent molecular weight profiles of
169
hydrolysates and peptides (Samaranayaka & Li-Chan, 2011). However, the choice of
170
enzyme, and enzyme reaction conditions (pH, temperature, time, and enzyme concentration)
171
are the crucial factors to prepare rice protein derived hydrolysates and peptides with desirable
172
functional characteristics (Kim & Wijesekara, 2010; Samaranayaka & Li-Chan, 2011). It is
173
also well known that only few peptides have the potential health promoting activity among a
174
group of various peptides released after hydrolysis. Therefore, it is essential to highlight that
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
151
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT biological and functional activity of the peptides evaluated using in vitro analysis are not
176
enough and need to confirm by in vivo methods to observe a real health benefit. The bioactive
177
peptides should be resistant to the gastrointestinal digestive enzymes. It must be absorbed
178
through enterocytes to the serum and further reach to the target site for exhibiting its
179
biological activity. The length of amino acid chain and its composition are of key factors that
180
play a crucial role in absorption and resistance to degradation by gastrointestinal digestive
181
enzymes (López-Barrios, Gutiérrez-Uribe, & Serna-Saldívar, 2014).
182
3.3 Enzymes used in the hydrolysis process
SC
RI PT
175
Rice proteins and their by-product proteins can be hydrolysed with a wide range of
184
commercial enzymes, which is derived from the plant, animal, and microbial sources. The
185
plant derived enzymes (ficin, bromelain, and papain) and animal derived enzymes (pepsin
186
and trypsin) have been widely used for enzymatic hydrolysis process. Alcalase®,
187
flavourzyme®, neutrase®, collagenase, and proteinase K are derived from the microbial
188
sources and most widely used microbial enzyme for hydrolysis process (P. Minkiewicz,
189
Dziuba, & Michalska, 2011; Piotr Minkiewicz et al., 2008). However, the cost of enzyme is a
190
rate limiting step for the successful preparation of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides.
191
Hence, it is recommended to use the cheap sources of proteinases those derived from waste or
192
by-products and microorganisms (Agyei & Danquah, 2011). Neutrase®, subtilisin, orientase,
193
alcalase®, flavoursyme®, and proteases from lactic acid bacteria are the most suitable to use
194
for the enzymatic hydrolysis due to their cheap cost as compared to others enzymes. Most of
195
these cost-effective enzymes derived from the microorganisms or microbial sources
196
(Zambrowicz, Timmer, Polanowski, Lubec, & Trziszka, 2013). Bioactive peptides can also
197
be generated during the microbial fermentation process and can be influenced by growth
198
parameters such as the inoculum conditions and peptide content in the medium (Agyei &
199
Danquah, 2011).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
183
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 200
4. Approaches for exploring biological activity of hydrolysates and peptides In the last years, various researchers have been focused their research studies on the
202
identification, characterisation, and purification of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides from
203
rice processing by-products. Classical or traditional approaches, in silico or computational
204
approaches, and integrated approaches are majorly used to explore the potential of bioactive
205
peptides.
206
4.1 Classical or traditional approaches
RI PT
201
In traditional approaches, various steps are involved in the development of bioactive
208
rice protein derived peptides. The classical method involves firstly the selection of particular
209
protein sources and their enzymatic hydrolysis using the food-grade/non-food grade enzymes
210
for the preparation of the hydrolysates and peptides. Subsequently, prepared protein
211
hydrolysates subjected to the fractionation and purification based on their particular
212
biological and functional activity (Udenigwe, 2014; Udenigwe & Aluko, 2012). The most
213
potential bioactive hydrolysates/peptide sequences are subjected to identification using mass
214
spectrometry methods. Further, biological and functional activities of released peptides are
215
validated by chemically synthesized peptides. This approach has several drawbacks.
TE D
M AN U
SC
207
1.
It is a time-consuming process.
217
2.
This approach may lead to the lower yields of isolated bioactive peptides with desired
220
AC C functional features.
218 219
EP
216
3.
Loss of some potential bioactive peptides may occur during the purification process.
4.2 In silico or computational approaches
221
The computational simulated approaches can be used for exploring the bioactive
222
hydrolysates and peptides (Pooja & Rani, 2017). In silico analysis is a suitable method for
223
predicting the release of potential bioactive peptides from the known parental protein
224
sequences. It is a suitable and emerging approach for exploring the novel and unexplored
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT proteins which has not been previously studied as sources of bioactive peptides (Lafarga,
226
O’Connor, & Hayes, 2014; Pal & Suresh, 2017; Pooja & Rani, 2017). Several popular
227
bioinformatics tools, such as basic local alignment search tool (Altschul et al., 1997, 2005),
228
BIOPEP database tool (Piotr Minkiewicz et al., 2008), PeptideDB, CAMP, APD2 or
229
PepBank, and QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship) (Pripp, Isaksson, Stepaniak,
230
Sørhaug, & Ardö, 2005; Wu, Aluko, & Nakai, 2006) have been well employed to predict and
231
design the potential bioactive peptides from the plant, animal, and food-derived proteins.
232
PeptideCutter, EnzymePredictor, PeptideRanker or PeptideLocator tools can be used to
233
predict possible cleavage sites of the given protein sequences (Mooney et al., 2013, 2012).
234
Recently, the computational approaches (in silico analysis) has been used to identify the
235
potential sources of various bioactive and functional peptides (such as antioxidant, ACE-I
236
and DPP-IV inhibiting peptides) from various sources (egg, milk, pea, oat, barley, meat, fish
237
and others). Various researchers reported the potential theoretically released bioactive
238
peptides from various plant, milk, and meat sources (Chang & Alli, 2012; Fu, Young, et al.,
239
2016; Fu, Wu, Zhu, & Xiao, 2016; Lafarga et al., 2014; P. Minkiewicz et al., 2011;
240
Nongonierma & FitzGerald, 2014; Nongonierma, Mooney, Shields, & FitzGerald, 2014; Pal
241
& Suresh, 2017; Pooja & Rani, 2017; Udenigwe, 2016; Udenigwe, Gong, & Wu, 2013),
242
however, till date the bioactivities of predicted bioactive peptides have not been confirmed.
243
The
244
(http://pops.csse.monash.edu.au) can be used for in silico proteolysis of given/selected
245
protein sequences. Usually, the in silico approach involves computational mining of protein
246
sequence information available in the database, followed by in silico hydrolysis of the protein
247
based on known enzyme cleavage sites. The in silico approaches have several advantages
248
over traditional experimental approaches towards the exploration of potential bioactive
249
hydrolysates and peptides.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
225
online
tools
BIOPEP,
ExPASy
10
PeptideCutter,
and
PoPS
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. It is a time-saving process.
251
2. It is a more economical process for prediction of biologically active peptides.
252
3. Computer simulated approaches can also be used to investigate bioactive peptides
253
derived from various food-source proteins such as plant proteins, milk proteins, fish
254
proteins, muscle proteins and others protein from various sources (Minkiewicz et al.,
255
2011).
256
RI PT
250
4. The utilisation of computational approach can reduce the number of experiments. However, sometimes the peptides released from computational derived approaches
258
may not be generated experimentally due to the complex interaction between selected
259
enzymes and proteins as well as their post-translational modifications (Mohan, Rajendran,
260
He, Bazinet, & Udenigwe, 2015). Hence, following a successful in silico digestion of proteins
261
by computational methods to produce the bioactive sequences need to be evaluated by real
262
laboratory synthesis under optimal temperature, and pH conditions and their bioactivity also
263
need to validate by in vitro and in vivo methods (Rani & Pooja, 2018). QSAR method can
264
also help to search the information which relates the chemical structure to biological
265
activities using the computer simulated analysis. In the research area of bioactive
266
hydrolysates and peptide studies, the utilisation of QSAR and other methods has increased
267
which is crucial prior to in vitro and in vivo experiments (Iwaniak, Minkiewicz, Darewicz,
268
Protasiewicz, & Mogut, 2015; Pripp et al., 2005). In QSAR methods, the bioactivities of
269
selected peptides are closely related to their structural variations (Hellberg, Sjoestroem,
270
Skagerberg, & Wold, 1987). Furthermore, QSAR models can also be employed for the
271
activity prediction of synthetic/natural peptides, and to identify the novel functional and
272
biological activity containing peptides.
273
4.3 Integrated approaches
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
257
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Due to the various drawback and limitations of the classical and in silico approaches,
275
an integrated approach is projected for the exploration of potential bioactive peptides and
276
hydrolysates. Enzymatic hydrolysis using one or more proteases/enzymes is an efficient way
277
of releasing bioactive peptides from their parental protein sources (Korhonen & Pihlanto,
278
2006). This proposed approach involves the selection of the optimum protease/enzyme
279
according to the computer simulated approaches or in silico approaches. The computational
280
based analysis and tools such as BIOPEP and Expasy Peptide Cutter can be simplified the
281
enzyme/protease selection process. Further, the selected protein needs to be subjected to in
282
vitro digestion by selected enzymes to generate the protein hydrolysates and peptides. The in
283
vitro released hydrolysates and peptides can be characterized by tandem mass spectroscopy
284
(Harnedy & FitzGerald, 2012). Thereafter, the identified hydrolysates and peptide profiles are
285
subjected to the prediction of activity by in silico methods. In integrated approaches, the
286
experimental analyses play a crucial role in the exploration of bioactive hydrolysates and
287
peptides. The details of the various in silico tools utilised for the exploration of bioactive
288
peptides and hydrolysates are given below.
289
4.3.1 ProtParam tool
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
274
The amino acid compositions of the selected protein sequences can be predicted using
291
ProtParam tool. ProtParam is an in silico analysis program that computes the physico-
292
chemical properties of a protein or peptide from its amino acid sequences (Gasteiger et al.,
293
2005). The total number of the amino acids, molecular weight, and theoretical pI of the
294
selected protein sequences can also be predicted using this tool.
295
4.3.2 PeptideRanker tool
AC C
EP
290
296
PeptideRanker is a web-based server to predict the probability of bio-activity of a
297
given peptides. PeptideRanker tool can rank the peptide sets and assign the peptide score in
298
the range of 0-1, on the basis of structure-function patterns. The maximum score represents
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 299
the most potent active peptides, and least score denotes the least active peptides (Mooney et
300
al., 2012).
301
4.3.3 BIOPEP tool
302
Profile of potential biological activity of selected protein sequences The potential biological activity profile of any chosen protein sequences can be
304
predicted by BIOPEP tool (Piotr Minkiewicz et al., 2008). This tool provides the complete
305
profile of selected protein for the presence of possibly released bioactive peptides. The
306
occurrence frequency of potential bioactive fragments in the selected protein sequences can
307
also be calculated using the BIOPEP tool. The occurrence frequency of bioactive fragments
308
or peptides derived from the selected proteins has been computed using the following
309
equation
310
A = a/N
311
Where, A = occurrence frequency of the bioactive fragments or peptides, a = number of
312
bioactive peptides, and N = total number of amino acid residues in the selected protein
313
sequences.
314
In silico proteolysis
Eq. (1)
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
303
The selected protein sequences can be subjected for in silico proteolysis to predict the
316
theoretically released peptide sequences using enzymatic action program available in the
317
BIOPEP tool. This tool allows the user to predict the potential of various substrates (known
318
protein sequences) to generate theoretical bioactive peptides using enzymes with known
319
cleavage specificities. In this tool, more than 25 enzymes can be applied alone or in
320
combination to release the theoretical bioactive peptides and hydrolysates. Further,
321
theoretically released fragments and peptides can be used to search the bioactive fragments or
322
peptides using search for active fragments option of BIOPEP tool. The possibilities for the
323
release of bioactive peptides by using selected proteases can also be predicted using the
AC C
EP
315
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 324
BIOPEP tool (P. Minkiewicz et al., 2011; Piotr Minkiewicz et al., 2008). The following
325
equation is used to calculate the release frequency of bioactive fragments by selected protease
326
(AE) and the relative frequency for the release of bioactive fragments by selected enzymes
327
(W). AE = d/N
Eq. (2)
RI PT
328 329
Where, d = the number of bioactive fragments released by enzymes in the protein sequence,
330
N = the number of amino acid residues in the protein chain. W = AE/A
Eq. (3)
SC
331
The values of these parameters were calculated based on Equations (1) and (2), respectively.
333
Sensory characteristics profile
M AN U
332
The sensory characteristics prediction of the peptides released from selected protein
335
can be predicted using the BIOPEP tool. The various sensory characteristics such as
336
astringent, bitter, bitterness suppressing, salt enhancer, salty, sour, sweet, umami, and umami
337
enhancing can be predicted by BIOPEP tool (Iwaniak, Minkiewicz, Darewicz, &
338
Hrynkiewicz, 2016; Iwaniak, Minkiewicz, Darewicz, Sieniawski, & Starowicz, 2016).
339
Peptides and amino acids have the capacity to altering the taste of food commodities and
340
products. The overall sensory profiles of the protein hydrolysates can also be predicted using
341
BIOPEP tool.
342
4.3.4 Physico-chemical characteristics
EP
AC C
343
TE D
334
The physico-chemical features of the potential bioactive peptides can be evaluated
344
using the online peptide calculators. The BIOPEP tool can also be used to calculate the
345
molecular weight profile, location of the peptides released from selected protein sequences.
346
The theoretical molecular weight, isoelectric point, the peptide charge at pH 7, estimated
347
solubility and extinction coefficient of the peptides can be estimated using online Pepcalc
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 348
software. Additionally, theoretical MW and isoelectric point of the peptides can be calculated
349
using the ExPASy Compute PL/MW Tool (Gasteiger et al., 2005).
350
4.3.5 Primary structure The primary structure of the selected food derived bioactive peptides can be draw
352
using the PepDraw tool. The web link for drawing the primary structure has been given in
353
Table 1.
354
4.3.5 Toxicity prediction
RI PT
351
The toxicity of the bioactive peptides can be predicted by using ToxinPred online
356
tool. The SVM (support vector machine) based prediction method with a threshold value of
357
0.0 can be chosen for the toxicity prediction of peptides released from food proteins. The
358
threshold value (0.0) was usually used to separate toxic and non-toxic peptides (Gupta et al.,
359
2013).
360
4.3.6 Allergenicity prediction
M AN U
SC
355
The potentially bioactive peptides and hydrolysates released from the selected
362
proteins were assessed for their potential allergenicity using AllerTOP tool. However,
363
Allergen FP v.1.0-Another in silico tool can also be used to predict the allergenicity of the
364
protein hydrolysates and peptides (Dimitrov et al., 2014). These tools use a variety of amino
365
acid principal properties, such as hydrophobicity and β-strand forming propensities for
366
allergenicity prediction.
367
5. Purification and characterisation of rice bran derived peptides
EP
AC C
368
TE D
361
After the hydrolysis of protein, it is frequently essential to fractionate and purify the
369
mixture of peptides. Ultrafiltration, reversed-phase chromatography, ion exchange
370
chromatography, gel filtration chromatography and size exclusion chromatography are the
371
most common methods used for the purification of peptides. Reversed-phase (RP)-high-
372
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is one of the extensively used methods for the
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT purification and characterisation of peptides. However, nowadays liquid chromatography
374
(LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) is one of the preferred methods for the characterisation of
375
bioactive peptides which is separated by HPLC (Pal & Suresh, 2016). MS is an extremely
376
useful tool for the identification and characterisation of peptides and proteins due to its ability
377
to calculate the accurate molecular weight of the molecule. Electrospray ionisation (ESI) and
378
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) MS have also been used for peptide and
379
protein identification. However, these methods cannot be economically viable due to their
380
higher cost. In order to reduce the cost, the use of immobilized enzymes and membrane
381
separation techniques were recommended for large-scale processes (Agyei & Danquah, 2011;
382
Korhonen & Pihlanto, 2006). Immobilized enzymes allow the user to reuse the enzymes and
383
also allows for more organized working conditions (Agyei & Danquah, 2011).
384
6. Biological activity of hydrolysates/peptides from rice processing by-products
M AN U
SC
RI PT
373
The hydrolysates and peptides released from the rice processing by-products have a
386
wide range of the applications in food and other allied sectors. In food industries, rice bran
387
derived protein hydrolysates can be used as functional and nutraceutical ingredients towards
388
the development of novel functional foods. In the last decades, the demand for food enriched
389
with plant proteins derived functional hydrolysates is growing due to the improvement in the
390
nutritive and functional properties of the food commodities. During last five years, various
391
research findings indicate the potential biological activities of rice bran derived
392
hydrolysates/peptides (Fig. 3). They have several biological activities such as antioxidative,
393
antihypertensive, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and other biological activities. Here, we
394
have discussed the antioxidative activity of rice bran derived bioactive hydrolysates and
395
peptides.
396
6.1. Antioxidant activity
AC C
EP
TE D
385
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In vertebrates and humans, oxidation is a vital process that leads to the formation of
398
free radicals. The oxygen radicals can react with every cellular component and create the
399
functional and morphological disturbances in cells. Antioxidants are extensively used to
400
check the oxidation reaction (Najafian & Babji, 2012; Pal & Suresh, 2016). The deterioration
401
of the food takes place due to the lipid oxidation and formation of various undesirable
402
secondary lipid peroxidation products such as peroxides, aldehydes, and ketones
403
(Cheetangdee & Benjakul, 2015). Synthetic antioxidants are widely used in food products to
404
reduce the deterioration. Butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, tert-butyl
405
hydroquinone, and propyl gallate are the commonly used antioxidants in the food and allied
406
sectors. Recently, there has been a growing interest to replace the synthetic antioxidants with
407
natural antioxidants owing to the concerns of health issues associated with synthetic
408
antioxidants (Cheetangdee & Benjakul, 2015; Najafian & Babji, 2012).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
397
The antioxidant potential of the rice bran derived protein hydrolysates and peptides
410
have been widely demonstrated in various oxidative systems such as free radical scavenging
411
activity, reducing power and metal ion-chelating capacity. In the low molecular weight of
412
protein hydrolysates and peptides, the presence of some specific amino acids could enhance
413
antioxidant activities (Cheetangdee & Benjakul, 2015; Liu, Wang, Li, Liang, & Yang, 2016).
414
Free radical-scavenging activities response of rice protein in an in vitro digestive system has
415
been highlighted to suppress the oxidative damage (Liu et al., 2016). It was also reported that
416
the antioxidant potential of heat stable defatted rice bran derived protein hydrolysates
417
associated with its reduced molecular weight profile, amino acid composition and
418
hydrophobicity (Zhang, Wang, Zhang, & Zhang, 2014). Incorporation of the rice bran
419
derived protein hydrolysates could improve the oxidative stability of bulk oil and emulsion
420
(Cheetangdee & Benjakul, 2015). The commercially available rice dreg protein hydrolysates
421
(RDPH) (released by trypsin hydrolysis) have been studied as natural antioxidants in a
AC C
EP
TE D
409
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 422
variety of emulsion-type food systems. RDPH containing corn oil-in-water emulsion was
423
more stable when used in combination with Tween 20 as compared to the emulsions prepared
424
by either RDPH or Tween-20 alone (Zhao, Selomulya, et al., 2012). Furthermore, selenium-enriched rice protein hydrolysates exhibit the potential
426
antioxidant activity evaluated by cellular antioxidant activity test. Additionally, a positive
427
correlation has been found between the antioxidant activity and immunomodulatory activity
428
of selenium-enriched rice protein hydrolysates (Fang et al., 2017). The protein hydrolysates
429
released from rice protein isolate showed the potent antioxidant activity. These protein
430
hydrolysates demonstrated as effective natural antioxidants to prevent the lipid oxidation for
431
improving the shelf-life of meat products (Zhou et al., 2013).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
425
The rice bran derived peptide sequence Tyr-Ser-Lys has been released after digestion
433
with trypsin enzyme. This peptide exhibited the strong scavenging activities on DPPH,
434
reducing power assay (Wang et al., 2017). Hence, rice protein hydrolysates could help to
435
enhance the stability of food emulsions, as well as act as a natural antioxidant. Numbers of
436
studies have shown in vitro and in vivo that rice bran derived protein hydrolysate/peptides
437
could be a potential natural antioxidant (Table 2).
438
7. Safety and bioavailability profile of the rice bran derived antioxidant peptides
EP
TE D
432
The rice bran protein derived hydrolysates and peptides must be safe for the
440
consumption. The rice bran proteins are usually safe for human consumption. If the bioactive
441
peptides are produced using digestive enzymes and food-grade enzymes, then there has been
442
a little concern about the safety of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides (Agyei, Tsopmo, &
443
Udenigwe, 2018). However, the released hydrolysates and peptides must be subjected to
444
analyse their toxicity and allergenicity profile. The rice bran derived bioactive hydrolysates
445
and peptides must have the acceptable level of toxicological profiles. Peptides (derived from
446
plant and animal proteins) released using the enzyme (obtained from plant or animal sources)
AC C
439
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT which are frequently employed in several food-processing industries are reported to be safe
448
without any health risk (Pooja, Rani & Prakash, 2017). Peptides with low molecular weight
449
profile are non-toxic and known to be less allergenic compared with their native proteins
450
(Lafarga, O’Connor, & Hayes, 2014; Pooja, Rani & Prakash, 2017). Val, Thr, Arg, Gln, Met,
451
Leu, Lys, Ile, Phe, and Ala are the primary components of non-toxic peptides. Sometimes, the
452
nature of the food products (in which hydrolysates/peptides incorporated) also affects the
453
safety and toxicological profiles of the selected bioactive hydrolysates and peptides. Mass
454
spectrometry techniques are widely used to evaluate the possible formation of toxic
455
compounds when peptides interact with the food product matrix. Mass spectrometry and
456
computational biology approaches could also be used to evaluate the quality, and safety
457
(included toxicity, allergenicity etc.). Hence, it is required to evaluate the safety and
458
toxicological
459
peptides/hydrolysates following the international authority’s guidelines.
characteristics
of
M AN U
SC
RI PT
447
the
food
products
incorporated
with
these
Bioavailability of the bioactive hydrolysates/peptides can be characterized as the
461
proportion of a given hydrolysates/peptides/nutrient in a selected food product that is actually
462
utilized by the body across the gastrointestinal tract. These hydrolysates/peptides may be
463
resistant or can be absorbed during gastrointestinal digestion (Guo et al., 2014). Several
464
products are under development by various food industries to explore the potential of food-
465
derived bioactive hydrolysates and peptides. One of the most important task that needs for
466
delivering the functional/biological activity of bioactive hydrolysate/peptides is the
467
bioavailability. The bioavailability of hydrolysate/peptides is one of the major concerns to
468
develop the novel functional food or nutraceutical products. The optimisation of healthy and
469
functional food products through its nutrition value by using hydrolysates or peptides is a
470
major scientific and technological challenge (Agyei et al., 2018). The food processing
471
variables such as pH, temperature, and time should be appropriately controlled and must be
AC C
EP
TE D
460
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT chosen very carefully to preserve the activity of the incorporated hydrolysates and peptides in
473
the food products. As well as, the behaviour of the bioactive peptides in a given food product,
474
deterioration and shelf life of the food products must be considered for finalisation of the
475
food product (Carrasco-Castilla, Hernández-Álvarez, Jiménez-Martínez, Gutiérrez-López, &
476
Dávila-Ortiz, 2012). The in vitro and in vivo methods (Cell culture, animal models, and
477
human studies) have been widely used to study the bioavailability of selected hydrolysates
478
and peptides.
479
8. Major challenges and the future research directions
SC
RI PT
472
The assessment of error rates in the prediction of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides
481
is an important issue. The faster speed of the computational approaches may be lead to the
482
false prediction of the bioactive peptides from the selected proteins. The identification of
483
false-positive bioactive peptides and hydrolysates are particularly dangerous for
484
biologists/scientist interested in studying the function of these selected hydrolysates and
485
peptides. Hence, the most popular approach for searching the protein from the various
486
biological databases should be practiced with great caution (Carrasco-Castilla et al., 2012).
487
The computational approaches used for the preparation and development of the bioactive
488
hydrolysate and peptides are the comprehensive, cost-effective and time saving process. After
489
the successful development and production of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides, the
490
incorporation of these hydrolysates/peptides into a food matrix is considered as a potential
491
challenge for the scientific community. Bioactive peptides must be delivered to the cellular
492
sites of action without affecting its functional characteristics. These hydrolysates/peptides can
493
be administered using different vehicles such as beverages, gummy paste, chewing gum etc.
494
Microencapsulation method can also be used to enhance their stability and absorption
495
(Carrasco-Castilla et al., 2012). The generation of peptides and hydrolysates from the parent
496
protein and assessment of their biological activity have been performed using computational
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
480
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT methods and published in various biological databases. The use of computational biology
498
approaches may speed up the screening of high-potential peptides from different sources.
499
Computational methods may also be helpful to optimize controlled hydrolysis of the parent
500
protein for the production of peptides with potential biological activity. It is also well known
501
that computer simulated results are not always replicated in laboratory analysis. Hence, there
502
is a need to establish a more predictive accuracy for the generation of bioactive peptides
503
using different in silico tools and methods (Agyei et al., 2018). However, the results of these
504
studies need to be verified by using the in vitro and in vivo analysis. These approaches do not
505
replace the need for further experimental verification and analysis. As well as, in the area of
506
food science and technology, computational approaches (in silico simulation) analysis can be
507
used as a fast tool for the initial screening of high potential sources of bioactive hydrolysates
508
and peptides. Computational approaches can be used to study the following characteristics of
509
the bioactive hydrolysates and peptides derived from the food sources: Searching for
510
potential precursors of bioactive hydrolysates and peptides, computational derived structure
511
simulations, protein/protease selection for hydrolysis, prediction of sensory characteristics,
512
structure-function relationships, screening and prediction of biological activity, simulated
513
proteolysis, secondary structure prediction, toxicity prediction, allergenicity prediction,
514
evaluation of physico-chemical properties and structure-activity relationship analysis etc.
515
(Agyei et al., 2018; Carrasco-Castilla et al., 2012; Rani & Pooja, 2018). Still, it is important
516
to consider that mathematical model used for the optimisation cannot be applied in all
517
conditions (such as temperature, pH and processing time) and sometimes may result in the
518
false positive information to the scientific community. Further work is also needed to
519
improve the predictive capability of computational tools for the development and analysis of
520
functional bioactive peptides present in food and other complex biological matrices (Agyei et
521
al., 2018).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
497
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 522
9. Sensory characteristics of rice bran derived antioxidant peptides The bioactive hydrolysates and peptides generation has gained the attention of the
524
scientific community to design novel nutraceutical and functional food products. Several
525
factors need to be looked after optimisation of bioactive peptides production. The sensory
526
characteristic is one of the major concerns when incorporated into the desired food products
527
(Agyei et al., 2018). Taste is one of the critical factor responsible for determining the quality
528
of any food commodities and responsible for differentiating among food products. It is well
529
reported that sweet, bitter, and umami are superior taste attributes of peptides and
530
hydrolysates released after enzymatic hydrolysis. The presence of bitter peptides was
531
dominant compared with that of the other tastes. Pooja, Rani & Prakash, (2017) reported the
532
ACE-inhibitory peptides released from the rice proteins with bitter taste, bitterness-
533
suppressing taste and sweet taste using the in silico analysis. Peptides that are composed of
534
up to eight amino acid residues have more bitterness. Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and glycine are
535
major amino acids that have an impact on the bitterness of peptides (Rani, Pooja, & Kumar,
536
2017). Encapsulation approach can be used to improve the bioavailability and sensory
537
characteristics of bitter peptides and hydrolysates.
538
10. Conclusion
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
523
The rice processing industry generates a huge amount of by-products, which should
540
be adequately managed not only to attend to environmental concerns but also to generate the
541
added valued food products. The enzymatic process can achieve the conversion of rice
542
protein into bioactive hydrolysates and peptides. The utilisation of the computational and
543
integrated approaches can be efficiently used to explore the bioactive peptides and
544
hydrolysates from novel substrates. Computational approaches will be useful for the food
545
manufacturers to predict the possible bioactivity of the peptide in a cost-effective and less
546
labour intensive manner. The combination of clinical trials related to bioactive peptides in a
AC C
539
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT food matrix and computational analysis will make easier confirmation of their health-
548
promoting activities as well as recognized by international agencies (such as Food and Drug
549
Administration and European Food Safety Authority). Rice-derived bioactive hydrolysates
550
and peptides with antioxidative properties may be a potential substitute for synthetic
551
antioxidants towards the development of functional foods. Moreover, additional research is
552
necessary to evaluate the safety profile of peptide-based products prior to commercialisation.
553
In addition, the rice protein hydrolysates/peptides incorporation as free or encapsulated
554
ingredients is also an exciting area for future research.
555
Acknowledgement & Conflict of interest
SC
RI PT
547
The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to
557
improve the manuscript. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding
558
agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare that we have
559
no conflict of interests.
560
References
561
Agyei, D., & Danquah, M. K. (2011). Industrial-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical-grade
TE D
562
M AN U
556
bioactive peptides. Biotechnology Advances, 29(3), 272–277. Agyei, D., Tsopmo, A., & Udenigwe, C. C. (2018). Bioinformatics and peptidomics
564
approaches to the discovery and analysis of food-derived bioactive peptides.
AC C
565
EP
563
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0974-1
566
Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., & Lipman,
567
D. J. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database
568
search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(17), 3389–3402.
569
Altschul, S. F., Wootton, J. C., Gertz, E. M., Agarwala, R., Morgulis, A., Schäffer, A. A., &
570
Yu, Y.-K. (2005). Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 571
substitution
matrices.
FEBS
Journal,
572
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04945.x
272(20),
5101–5109.
Amagliani, L., O’Regan, J., Kelly, A. L., & O’Mahony, J. A. (2017a). Composition and
574
protein profile analysis of rice protein ingredients. Journal of Food Composition and
575
Analysis, 59, 18–26.
RI PT
573
Amagliani, L., O’Regan, J., Kelly, A. L., & O’Mahony, J. A. (2017b). The composition,
577
extraction, functionality and applications of rice proteins: a review. Trends in Food
578
Science & Technology, 64, 1–12.
SC
576
Anal, A. K., Noomhorm, A., & Vongsawasdi, P. (2013). Protein hydrolysates and bioactive
580
peptides from seafood and crustacean waste: their extraction, bioactive properties and
581
industrial perspectives. Marine proteins and peptides: biological activities and
582
applications, 709–735.
M AN U
579
Arsa, S., & Theerakulkait, C. (2018). Preparation, aroma characteristics and volatile
584
compounds of flavorings from enzymatic hydrolyzed rice bran protein concentrate.
585
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8972
TE D
583
Carrasco-Castilla, J., Hernández-Álvarez, A. J., Jiménez-Martínez, C., Gutiérrez-López, G.
587
F., & Dávila-Ortiz, G. (2012). Use of proteomics and peptidomics methods in food
588
bioactive peptide science and engineering. Food Engineering Reviews, 4(4), 224–243.
589
Chandi, G. K., & Sogi, D. S. (2007). Functional properties of rice bran protein concentrates.
AC C
590
EP
586
Journal of Food Engineering, 79(2), 592–597.
591
Chang, Y.-W., & Alli, I. (2012). In silico assessment: Suggested homology of chickpea
592
(Cicer arietinum L.) legumin and prediction of ACE-inhibitory peptides from
593
chickpea proteins using BLAST and BIOPEP analyses. Food Research International,
594
49(1), 477–486.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 595
Cheetangdee, N., & Benjakul, S. (2015). Antioxidant activities of rice bran protein
596
hydrolysates in bulk oil and oil-in-water emulsion. Journal of the Science of Food and
597
Agriculture, 95(7), 1461–1468. Chen, J., Liu, S., Ye, R., Cai, G., Ji, B., & Wu, Y. (2013). Angiotensin-I converting enzyme
599
(ACE) inhibitory tripeptides from rice protein hydrolysate: Purification and
600
characterization. Journal of Functional Foods, 5(4), 1684–1692.
RI PT
598
Dei Piu, L., Tassoni, A., Serrazanetti, D. I., Ferri, M., Babini, E., Tagliazucchi, D., &
602
Gianotti, A. (2014). Exploitation of starch industry liquid by-product to produce
603
bioactive peptides from rice hydrolyzed proteins. Food Chemistry, 155, 199–206.
605 606 607
Dimitrov, I., Bangov, I., Flower, D. R., & Doytchinova, I. (2014). AllerTOP v. 2-a server for
M AN U
604
SC
601
in silico prediction of allergens. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 20(6), 1–6. Fabian, C., & Ju, Y.-H. (2011). A review on rice bran protein: its properties and extraction methods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 51(9), 816–827. Fang, Y., Chen, X., Luo, P., Pei, F., Kimatu, B. M., Liu, K., … Hu, Q. (2017). The
609
correlation between in vitro antioxidant activity and immunomodulatory activity of
610
enzymatic hydrolysates from selenium-enriched rice protein. Journal of Food
611
Science, 82(2), 517–522.
613
EP
Fu, Y., Wu, W., Zhu, M., & Xiao, Z. (2016). In silico assessment of the potential of patatin as
AC C
612
TE D
608
a precursor of bioactive peptides. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 40(3), 366–370.
614
Fu, Y., Young, J. F., Løkke, M. M., Lametsch, R., Aluko, R. E., & Therkildsen, M. (2016).
615
Revalorisation of bovine collagen as a potential precursor of angiotensin I-converting
616
enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides based on in silico and in vitro protein digestions.
617
Journal of Functional Foods, 24, 196–206.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 618
Galanakis, C. M. (2012). Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes:
619
conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends in
620
Food Science & Technology, 26(2), 68–87. Galanakis, C. M. (2013). Emerging technologies for the production of nutraceuticals from
622
agricultural by-products: a viewpoint of opportunities and challenges. Food and
623
Bioproducts Processing, 91(4), 575–579.
RI PT
621
Gasteiger, E., Hoogland, C., Gattiker, A., Duvaud, S., Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., &
625
Bairoch, A. (2005). Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server.
626
Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1385/1-59259-890-
627
0:571
M AN U
SC
624
Guo, L., Harnedy, P. A., Li, B., Hou, H., Zhang, Z., Zhao, X., & FitzGerald, R. J. (2014).
629
Food protein-derived chelating peptides: Biofunctional ingredients for dietary mineral
630
bioavailability enhancement. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 37(2), 92–105.
631
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.02.007
TE D
628
Gupta, S., Kapoor, P., Chaudhary, K., Gautam, A., Kumar, R., Consortium, O. S. D. D., &
633
Raghava, G. P. S. (2013). In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and
634
proteins. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073957
636
Harnedy, P. A., & FitzGerald, R. J. (2012). Bioactive peptides from marine processing waste
AC C
635
EP
632
and shellfish: A review. Journal of Functional Foods, 4(1), 6–24.
637
Hellberg, S., Sjoestroem, M., Skagerberg, B., & Wold, S. (1987). Peptide quantitative
638
structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach. Journal of Medicinal
639 640
Chemistry, 30(7), 1126–1135. Iwaniak, A., Minkiewicz, P., Darewicz, M., & Hrynkiewicz, M. (2016). Food protein-
641
originating
peptides
as
tastants-Physiological,
642
bioinformatic approaches. Food Research International, 89, 27–38.
26
technological,
sensory,
and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 643
Iwaniak, A., Minkiewicz, P., Darewicz, M., Protasiewicz, M., & Mogut, D. (2015).
644
Chemometrics and cheminformatics in the analysis of biologically active peptides
645
from food sources. Journal of Functional Foods, 16, 334–351. Iwaniak, A., Minkiewicz, P., Darewicz, M., Sieniawski, K., & Starowicz, P. (2016). BIOPEP
647
database of sensory peptides and amino acids. Food Research International, 85, 155–
648
161.
651 652
bioactive peptides: A review. Journal of Functional Foods, 2(1), 1–9.
SC
650
Kim, S.-K., & Wijesekara, I. (2010). Development and biological activities of marine-derived
Korhonen, H., & Pihlanto, A. (2006). Bioactive peptides: production and functionality. International Dairy Journal, 16(9), 945–960.
M AN U
649
RI PT
646
653
Lafarga, T., O’Connor, P., & Hayes, M. (2014). Identification of novel dipeptidyl peptidase-
654
IV and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from meat proteins using
655
in silico analysis. Peptides, 59, 53–62.
Liu, K., Zhao, Y., Chen, F., & Fang, Y. (2015). Purification and identification of Se-
657
containing antioxidative peptides from enzymatic hydrolysates of Se-enriched brown
658
rice protein. Food Chemistry, 187, 424–430.
TE D
656
Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, H., Liang, M., & Yang, L. (2016). In vitro antioxidant activity of rice
660
protein affected by alkaline degree and gastrointestinal protease digestion. Journal of
AC C
661
EP
659
the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(15), 4940–4950.
662
López-Barrios, L., Gutiérrez-Uribe, J. A., & Serna-Saldívar, S. O. (2014). Bioactive peptides
663
and hydrolysates from pulses and their potential use as functional ingredients. Journal
664
of Food Science, 79(3), R273–R283.
665
Minkiewicz, P., Dziuba, J., & Michalska, J. (2011). Bovine meat proteins as potential
666
precursors of biologically active peptides - a computational study based on the
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 667
BIOPEP database. Food Science and Technology International, 17(1), 39–45.
668
https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013210368461 Minkiewicz, Piotr, Dziuba, J., Iwaniak, A., Dziuba, M., & Darewicz, M. (2008). BIOPEP
670
database and other programs for processing bioactive peptide sequences. Journal of
671
AOAC International, 91(4), 965–980.
RI PT
669
Mohan, A., Rajendran, S. R., He, Q. S., Bazinet, L., & Udenigwe, C. C. (2015).
673
Encapsulation of food protein hydrolysates and peptides: a review. RSC Advances,
674
5(97), 79270–79278.
SC
672
Mooney, C., Haslam, N. J., Holton, T. A., Pollastri, G., & Shields, D. C. (2013).
676
PeptideLocator: prediction of bioactive peptides in protein sequences. Bioinformatics,
677
29(9), 1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt103
M AN U
675
Mooney, C., Haslam, N. J., Pollastri, G., & Shields, D. C. (2012). Towards the improved
679
discovery and design of functional peptides: common features of diverse classes
680
permit generalized prediction of bioactivity. PLOS ONE, 7(10), e45012.
681
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045012
684 685 686
peptides: their production, assessment, and applications. Peptides, 33(1), 178–185.
EP
683
Najafian, L., & Babji, A. S. (2012). A review of fish-derived antioxidant and antimicrobial
Nongonierma, A. B., & FitzGerald, R. J. (2014). An in silico model to predict the potential of
AC C
682
TE D
678
dietary proteins as sources of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory peptides. Food Chemistry, 165, 489–498.
687
Nongonierma, A. B., Mooney, C., Shields, D. C., & FitzGerald, R. J. (2014). In silico
688
approaches to predict the potential of milk protein-derived peptides as dipeptidyl
689
peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors. Peptides, 57, 43–51.
690
Pal, G. K., & Suresh, P. V. (2016). Sustainable valorisation of seafood by-products: Recovery
691
of collagen and development of collagen-based novel functional food ingredients.
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 692
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 37, Part B, 201–215.
693
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.015 Pal, G. K., & Suresh, P. V. (2017). Physico-chemical characteristics and fibril-forming
695
capacity of carp swim bladder collagens and exploration of their potential bioactive
696
peptides by in silico approaches. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,
697
101, 304–313.
RI PT
694
Phongthai, S., D’Amico, S., Schoenlechner, R., Homthawornchoo, W., & Rawdkuen, S.
699
(2018). Fractionation and antioxidant properties of rice bran protein hydrolysates
700
stimulated by in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chemistry, 240, 156–164.
701
Phongthai, S., Lim, S.-T., & Rawdkuen, S. (2016). Optimization of microwave-assisted
702
extraction of rice bran protein and its hydrolysates properties. Journal of Cereal
703
Science, 70, 146–154.
M AN U
SC
698
Pooja, K., & Rani, S. (2017). Physico-chemical, sensory and toxicity characteristics of
705
dipeptidyl peptidase-iv inhibitory peptides from rice bran-derived globulin using
706
computational approaches. International Journal of Peptide Research and
707
Therapeutics, 23(4), 519–529.
710 711
bran
EP
709
Pooja, K., Rani, S., & Prakash, B. (2017). In silico approaches towards exploration of rice proteins
derived
AC C
708
TE D
704
International
Journal
angiotensin-I-converting of
Food
enzyme
inhibitory
Properties,
20,
peptides.
2178–2191.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1368552
712
Pripp, A. H., Isaksson, T., Stepaniak, L., Sørhaug, T., & Ardö, Y. (2005). Quantitative
713
structure activity relationship modelling of peptides and proteins as a tool in food
714
science. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 16(11), 484–494.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 715
Rani, S., & Pooja, K. (2018). Elucidation of structural and functional characteristics of
716
collagenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Process Biochemistry, 64, 116–123.
717
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.09.029 Rani, S., Pooja, K., & Kumar, G. (2017). Exploration of potential angiotensin converting
719
enzyme inhibitory peptides generated from enzymatic hydrolysis of goat milk
720
proteins.
721
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.06.008
Biocatalysis
and
RI PT
718
Agricultural
Biotechnology,
11,
83–88.
Samaranayaka, A. G., & Li-Chan, E. C. (2011). Food-derived peptidic antioxidants: A review
723
of their production, assessment, and potential applications. Journal of Functional
724
Foods, 3(4), 229–254.
M AN U
SC
722
725
Selamassakul, O., Laohakunjit, N., Kerdchoechuen, O., & Ratanakhanokchai, K. (2016). A
726
novel multi-biofunctional protein from brown rice hydrolysed by endo/endo-
727
exoproteases. Food & Function, 7(6), 2635–2644.
Senaphan, K., Sangartit, W., Pakdeechote, P., Kukongviriyapan, V., Pannangpetch, P.,
729
Thawornchinsombut, S., … Kukongviriyapan, U. (2018). Rice bran protein
730
hydrolysates reduce arterial stiffening, vascular remodeling and oxidative stress in
731
rats fed a high-carbohydrate and high-fat diet. European Journal of Nutrition, 57(1),
732
219–230.
AC C
EP
TE D
728
733
Sereewatthanawut, I., Prapintip, S., Watchiraruji, K., Goto, M., Sasaki, M., & Shotipruk, A.
734
(2008). Extraction of protein and amino acids from deoiled rice bran by subcritical
735 736 737
water hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 99(3), 555–561.
Sharif, M. K., Butt, M. S., Anjum, F. M., & Khan, S. H. (2014). Rice bran: a novel functional ingredient. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(6), 807–816.
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 738
Sila, A., & Bougatef, A. (2016). Antioxidant peptides from marine by-products: Isolation,
739
identification and application in food systems. A review. Journal of Functional
740
Foods, 21, 10–26. Sohail, M., Rakha, A., Butt, M. S., Iqbal, M. J., & Rashid, S. (2017). Rice Bran Nutraceutics:
742
A Comprehensive Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(17),
743
3771–3780.
RI PT
741
Thamnarathip, P., Jangchud, K., Nitisinprasert, S., & Vardhanabhuti, B. (2016). Identification
745
of peptide molecular weight from rice bran protein hydrolysate with high antioxidant
746
activity. Journal of Cereal Science, 69, 329–335.
748
Udenigwe, C. C. (2014). Bioinformatics approaches, prospects and challenges of food
M AN U
747
SC
744
bioactive peptide research. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 36(2), 137–143. Udenigwe, C. C. (2016). Towards rice bran protein utilization: In silico insight on the role of
750
oryzacystatins in biologically-active peptide production. Food Chemistry, 191, 135–
751
138.
TE D
749
Udenigwe, C. C., & Aluko, R. E. (2012). Food protein-derived bioactive peptides:
753
production, processing, and potential health benefits. Journal of Food Science, 77(1),
754
R11–R24.
756 757
Udenigwe, C. C., Gong, M., & Wu, S. (2013). In silico analysis of the large and small
AC C
755
EP
752
subunits of cereal RuBisCO as precursors of cryptic bioactive peptides. Process Biochemistry, 48(11), 1794–1799.
758
Wang, X., Chen, H., Fu, X., Li, S., & Wei, J. (2017). A novel antioxidant and ACE inhibitory
759
peptide from rice bran protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking
760
study. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 75, 93–99.
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 761
Wang, Z., Li, H., Liang, M., & Yang, L. (2016). Glutelin and prolamin, different components
762
of rice protein, exert differently in vitro antioxidant activities. Journal of Cereal
763
Science, 72, 108–116. Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, H., & Yang, L. (2016). Rice proteins, extracted by alkali and α-
765
amylase, differently affect in vitro antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry, 206, 137–
766
145.
RI PT
764
Wattanasiritham, L., Theerakulkait, C., Wickramasekara, S., Maier, C. S., & Stevens, J. F.
768
(2016). Isolation and identification of antioxidant peptides from enzymatically
769
hydrolyzed rice bran protein. Food Chemistry, 192, 156–162.
SC
767
Wu, J., Aluko, R. E., & Nakai, S. (2006). Structural requirements of angiotensin I-converting
771
enzyme inhibitory peptides: quantitative structure- activity relationship study of di-
772
and tripeptides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(3), 732–738.
773
Yan, Q.-J., Huang, L.-H., Sun, Q., Jiang, Z.-Q., & Wu, X. (2015). Isolation, identification
774
and synthesis of four novel antioxidant peptides from rice residue protein hydrolyzed
775
by multiple proteases. Food Chemistry, 179, 290–295.
TE D
M AN U
770
Zambrowicz, A., Timmer, M., Polanowski, A., Lubec, G., & Trziszka, T. (2013).
777
Manufacturing of peptides exhibiting biological activity. Amino Acids, 44(2), 315–
778
320.
AC C
EP
776
779
Zhang, H. J., Wang, J., Zhang, B. H., & Zhang, H. (2014). Antioxidant activities of the
780
fractionated protein hydrolysates from heat stable defatted rice bran. International
781
Journal of Food Science & Technology, 49(5), 1330–1336.
782
Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Guo, X., Wang, X., & Yao, H. (2010). Isolation and
783
identification of antioxidative peptides from rice endosperm protein enzymatic
784
hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS/MS. Food
785
Chemistry, 119(1), 226–234.
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 786
Zhao, Q., Selomulya, C., Wang, S., Xiong, H., Chen, X. D., Li, W., … Zhou, Q. (2012).
787
Enhancing the oxidative stability of food emulsions with rice dreg protein
788
hydrolysate. Food Research International, 48(2), 876–884. Zhao, Q., Xiong, H., Selomulya, C., Chen, X. D., Zhong, H., Wang, S., … Zhou, Q. (2012).
790
Enzymatic hydrolysis of rice dreg protein: effects of enzyme type on the functional
791
properties and antioxidant activities of recovered proteins. Food Chemistry, 134(3),
792
1360–1367.
RI PT
789
Zhou, K., Canning, C., & Sun, S. (2013). Effects of rice protein hydrolysates prepared by
794
microbial proteases and ultrafiltration on free radicals and meat lipid oxidation. LWT-
795
Food Science and Technology, 50(1), 331–335.
M AN U
796 797 798
803 804 805 806 807
EP
802
AC C
801
TE D
799 800
SC
793
808 809 810 811 812 33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions
814
Fig 1 Graphical presentation of the rice bran derived proteins
815
Fig 2 Outline of (Traditional and computational) process for developing the bioactive
816
peptides from rice processing by-products
817
Fig 3 Biological activities of the rice protein derived hydrolysates and peptides
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
813
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1: List of the various computational based tool and their web address to predict the potential biological activity Web address for tool
ProtParam tool
http://web.expasy.org/protparam/
PeptideRanker
http://bioware.ucd.ie/~compass/biowareweb/Server_pages/peptideranker.ph
RI PT
Tool
p
http://www.uwm.edu.pl/biochemia/index.php/pl/biopep
Expasy Peptide http://web.expasy.org/peptide_cutter/ Cutter
Allergen
http://www.pharmfac.net/allertop/
M AN U
AllerTOP tool
SC
BIOPEP
FP http://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/AllergenFP
v.1.0 http://pepdraw.com/
ToxinPred
http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/toxinpred/index.html
Pepcalc
http://pepcalc.com/
ExPASy
AC C
Compute
http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/
EP
software
TE D
PepDraw
PL/MW Tool
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2: Antioxidative capacity of rice protein derived hydrolysates and peptides Source
Enzyme used Hydrolysates Amino Antioxidant /peptides acid used sequen ce Protease Hydrolysates DPPH
Defatted
scavenging
sativa
Reducing
L.) licheniformis)
bran
Ferrous
Porcine
protein
pepsin
(Oryza
pancreatin
Hydrolysates and
-
power; (2015)
chelating
ABTS
scavenging
M AN U
Rice
activity; Benjakul,
SC
activity
radical Cheetangdee &
RI PT
rice (Oryza (Bacillus
assay References
radical Y. Liu et al.,
activity; (2016)
DPPH
sativa L.)
scavenging
radical activity;
iron chelating activity;
TE D
copper
-
Protamex
activity, and reducing power DPPH scavenging
AC C
rice bran
EP
Heat stable Alcalase, and Hydrolysates
chelating
radical H. J. Zhang et activity; al., (2014)
reducing
power;
ferrous ion chelating activity,
and
lipid
peroxidation inhibition activity Rice
Trypsin,
(Oryza
papain,
Hydrolysates and
-
Cellular activity
antioxidant Fang (2017)
et
al.,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT sativa L.)
pepsin
Rice
Neutral
protein
protease
absorbance
isolate
(Bacillus
ABTS
subtilis),
scavenging
validase
DPPH
(Aspergillus
scavenging activity
-
Oxygen
alkaline
(Bacillus licheniformis)
Hydrolysates
Tyr-
DPPH
and peptides
Ser-
scavenging
TE D
Trypsin
activity;
radical
radical X. Wang et al., activity; (2017)
Reducing power assay
Hydrolysates
RPNY
DPPH
and peptides
TDA,
scavenging
TSQL
ABTS
Protamex,
LSDQ,
scavenging
Pepsin,
TRTG
Ferrous
Papain,
DPFF
activity
Alcalase,
residue
Flavourzyme,
protein
Protamex,
AC C
EP
Rice
Rice
capacity; (2013)
Lys
Trypsin
radical Yan
et
al.,
activity; (2015) radical activity; chelating
and
and
their
NFHP
combinations
Q,
Alcalase,
al.,
radical
M AN U
protease
Rice bran
et
SC
oryzae), and
radical Zhou
RI PT
Hydrolysates
Hydrolysates
-
ABTS
radical Dei Piu et al.,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT proteins
Neutrase,
scavenging activity
(2014)
Flavourzyme, B.
subtilis
(SV27, B.
RI PT
SV20I), pumilus
(AGI) and B.
(AG2) dreg Alcalase,
protein
Hydrolysates
Neutrase,
DPPH
radical Zhao,
scavenging
Flavourzyme,
TE D
Trypsin Rice
Alcalase,
endosperm
Chymotrypsi
protein
n,
Xiong,
activity; et al., (2012)
Reducing power assay
Protamex and
Hydrolysates
FRDE
DPPH
and peptides
HKK,
scavenging
KHNR
Superoxide
radical
GDEF
scavenging
activity;
EP
Neutrase,
and
AC C
Papain,
-
M AN U
Rice
SC
licheniformis
Flavorase
radical J. Zhang et al., activity; (2010)
Hydroxyl
radical
scavenging
activity
and
inhibition
linoleic
acid
of
model
system Defatted
Alcalase,
commercia
Flavourzyme
Hydrolysates
-
ABTS scavenging
radical Thamnarathip, activity; Jangchud,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT l rice bran
and Neutrase
ferric
ion
reducing Nitisinprasert,
antioxidant power
& Vardhanabhuti, (2016)
Porcine
proteins
pepsin
Hydrolysates
-
and
ABTS
scavenging
pancreatin
DPPH
radical Z. Wang, Liu,
RI PT
Rice
radical (2016)
activity;
SC
scavenging
activity; Li, & Yang,
iron chelating activity;
M AN U
copper
chelating
activity, and reducing power
Rice bran
Trypsin
and Hydrolysates and peptides
Oxygen
radical Wattanasiritha
absorbance capacity
TE D
ProteaseMax
-
Theerakulkait, Wickramaseka
AC C
EP
ra, Maier, & Stevens, (2016)
Selenium
Neutrase,
Hydrolysates
SeMet- DPPH
enriched
Alcalase,
and peptides
Pro-
scavenging
brown rice
Flavorase,
Ser
Superoxide
and Papain
m,
scavenging Hydroxyl
radical K. Liu, Zhao, activity; Chen, & Fang, radical (2015) activity; radical
scavenging activity
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Raw
Alcalase
Hydrolysates
-
DPPH
radical Phongthai,
organic
scavenging
activity; Lim,
rice bran
Ferric
reducing Rawdkuen,
Metal activity Bromelain
Hydrolysates
-
ABTS
chelating
and protease and peptides
scavenging
FP51
DPPH
radical Selamassakul,
activity; Laohakunjit,
SC
Brown rice
power; (2016)
RI PT
antioxidant
radical Kerdchoechue
rice flour
pancreatin
and Hydrolysates
-
AC C
EP
TE D
Pepsin
M AN U
scavenging activity
Defatted
&
n,
&
Ratanakhanokc hai, (2016)
ABTS
radical- Z. Wang, Li,
scavenging
activity; Liang,
Superoxide
radical- Yang, (2016)
scavenging
activity;
Hydrogen
peroxide
scavenging
activity;
Nitric oxide radicalscavenging
activity;
iron chelating activity; copper
chelating
activity, and reducing power
&
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights By-products of rice processing are major sources of high-value proteins. Rice-derived protein hydrolysates and peptides have important biological activities. The safety and challenges of rice protein derived antioxidative peptides are discussed.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Bioactive peptides can be predicted using computational approaches.