depression to the period of boom. The
Communication
volume jk is initially
stored rather than
disposed of, but the subsequent release of kl from
the buffer stock will mean
that the same volume
External benefits of buffer stocks
will
enter
than being collected stock In a recent agency
paper,
acting
this subject,
and Grace’
they consider
it had operated keeping
Turner
in the waste
with
in the
paper
a simulation
of a buffer
simulations
over the period
of primary
ask whether
with a buffer stock scheme
commodity
1961-1974,
schemes.’
there are any external
and credit the scheme
hence results in savings to the waste the question
of whether
benefits,
magnitude
buffer
and
implied
on
a finding
However, benefits
with savings
disposal
authority.
stock agencies
argues
that
benefits
if in
Turner
associated stream,
and
This paper examines
in previous studies.
because
of the lower
If the stabilisation of the market price additional
external
benefit is generated.
It is assumed that the non-buffer collecting
stock
agencies are risk averse. so
the reduction
in the variance
of
market price caused by the buffer stock agency
more
encourages into
industry.
but are not of the
rather
of waste paper has a ‘supply effect’ an
enter
will have any such associated
are positive,
agencies
stream
by the non-buffer
price @*< p2 ).
that
in that waste
paper bought by the buffer stock agency does not enter the waste
external
stock
in the UK. As with other writers
that a buffer stock agency would have lost money
UK market
and Grace legitimately
discuss
market
of waste paper
the disposal
the waste
resources
to
paper
collection
In most European
countries,
for example, this is the argument used to encourage local authorities
to enter the
market on a large scale. In Figure 2 the A waste paper buffer stock scheme will
absorbed
yield an external benefit if its operations
period of depressed demand) is equal to
cause
of
kl (the release of waste paper from the
Figure
waste paper disposal or move the costs
buffer stock in the subsequent period of
effect of the lower input cost of paper
a reduction
of disposal
in
further
the
volume
away
in time.
order to show the external simplified paper
way
it is assumed
industry’s
paper
demand
is a negative
price. indicating partial
In
benefit in a that the
for
linear
waste
function
of
that waste paper is a
substitute for wood pulp in the
production
of paper
and
board.
The
boom).
by
the buffer
price, an intervention
between
association
economic paper
and D2
Dt
positive
activity.
from
selling
activities
operating
so
is
cover
its
about
p* if a
of stocks is to be
I the quantity of recycled
geometrically
municipal
waste
costs
disposal.
of
interference
stream If
in the market,
waste paper will be p, depression
with
and
positive
there
is
no
the price of
in the period of
pz in the period of
stock’s
operations
represents
the reduction
industry’s
demand
stock
is established
the higher intervention
price (p* >
and bd represents for
waste
stock
in Figure
is
2 the
collection
is an &crease
of ae + bf. Hence the
the increase in the paper
due
to the
p,) caused by
paper
with
the
boom demand. waste
paper
As the net quantity
purchased
of
by the paper
industry is unchanged over a completed cycle, there is of course no change in the
financial
accumulation
of
burden, unsold
stocks is avoided
by setting a unique
intervention
at
RESOURCES
buffer
p, )
volume
where jk (the quantity
a
in the paper
avoid an unnecessary
price
not
because
the waste paper market and, in order to secular
or
the release of stocks in the period of waste
objective of imposing a fixed price upon
the
whether
is equal to oc + od in
I, which is also equal to oa + ob
during the period of depressed demand,
lower market price (p*<
buffer
Figure
for waste paper at
is recycled
cycle is equal to oa + ob. Now assume that a
is
ca = bd. The amount ca
demand
production
price
waste
boom. The quantity of waste paper that in a completed
paper recycling
of waste paper
buffer
the
the
stock
over a completed cycle is oe + of, which
is
enter
of
p* to p*. When there is no supply elt‘ect, the vo ‘Iume of waste
net volume
also assumed to be a linear function and otherwise
intervention
case as it does not add to the
substance of the argument. In Figure
does not
buffer
However,
of positive elasticity. Paper not collected to
The
The as in
that the
price
established.
However,
over a completed paper production cycle is unaffected by the
assumed
the
we do not analyse
this
agencies
as to
and
costs. If so. the intervention
prices must be symmetrical
1 in
The supply of waste
on its buying
same
manufacture
reduce
unique
in Figure
the collecting
and paper-board significantly
now reduced from
a profit
by the buffer
the
I on the assumption
agency’s
avoided.
in
are
stock agency, perhaps with the objective
itself
the cycle
curves
of making
to
with
demand
products.
secular accumulation
parallel
price
supply curve shifts from S, to S,.
finished
range could be adopted
assumed
shift
in the
Of course. instead of a unique
intervention
demand schedule for waste paper is also to
stock
p* in Figure
I
of waste paper
POLICY
June
1977
However, been
of
waste
an external
generated
in
paper
Quonttty
disposal.
benefit will have terms
of
present
values because of the postponement
of
the costs of disposal from the period of
Figure without
1.
Waste
paper
recycling
a ‘supply effect’.
149