Fabrication of textured Ti2AlC lamellar composites with improved mechanical properties

Journal Pre-proof Fabrication of textured Ti2 AlC lamellar composites with improved mechanical properties Xi Xie, Rui Yang, Yuyou Cui, Qing Jia, Chunguang Bai

PII:

S1005-0302(19)30288-9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.070

Reference:

JMST 1697

To appear in: Received Date:

21 March 2019

Revised Date:

24 April 2019

Accepted Date:

13 May 2019

Please cite this article as: Xie X, Yang R, Cui Y, Jia Q, Bai C, Fabrication of textured Ti2 AlC lamellar composites with improved mechanical properties, Journal of Materials Science and amp; Technology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.070

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier.

Research Article

Fabrication of textured Ti2AlC lamellar composites with improved mechanical properties Xi Xiea,b, Rui Yanga,b, Yuyou Cui a,b, Qing Jiaa,b,*, Chunguang Baia,b,** a

School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology

of China, Hefei 230000, China b

Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

ro of

[Received 21 March 2019; Received in revised form 24 April 2019; Accepted 13 May 2019] *

Corresponding author.

E-mail address: [email protected] (Q. Jia). Corresponding author.

-p

**

re

E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Bai).

Textured Ti2AlC lamellar composites have been successfully fabricated by a new

lP

method in the present work. The composites exhibit high compressive strength of ca 2 GPa, fracture toughness of 8.5 MPa m1/2 (//c-axis), flexural strength of 735 MPa (//c-axis) and high hardness of 7.9 GPa (//c-axis). The strengthening mechanisms

na

were discussed. The sintering and densification process was investigated and crystal orientation and microstructure were studied by electron backscattered diffraction

ur

techniques. The synthesis temperature is reduced to 1200 °C by using high surface-to-volume ratio Ti2AlC nano flakes. The Lotgering orientation factor of

Jo

Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 {00l} planes in the textured top surface reaches 0.74 and 0.49， respectively. This new route may shed light on resolving the difficulties encountered in large scale fabrication of textured MAX phases. Keywords: MAX phase; Ti2AlC, Machinable ceramics; Ceramic-matrix composites; Reactive

milling;

microstructure

In-situ

synthesis;

Nanocomposites;

Texture;

Lamellar

1. Introduction Ti2AlC belongs to the family of nanolayered ternary carbides or nitrides (MAX phases). These compounds have a general chemical formula of Mn+1AXn, in which M is a transition metal, A is an A-group element (IIIA and IVA), and X is either C or N [1-3]. The unique nano laminated structure constituted by covalent-ionic M-X bonds and metallic M-A bonds endows them with a combination of metallic and ceramic properties [4]. MAX phases exhibit properties such as good electrical and thermal conductivity [5], high resistance to thermal shock [6, 7], damage tolerance [8],

ro of

corrosion and oxidation resistance [9-13], self-healing under high temperatures

[14-17], high resistance to radiation [18-23] etc. Among the MAX phases, Ti2AlC has been continually drawing attentions from researchers due to the advantages of relative

-p

light weight (4.11 g/cm3), low cost to achieve high purity, and superior oxidation resistance. The combination of the properties Ti2AlC makes it very promising for

re

corrosive, high temperature, nuclear and other applications.

However, Ti2AlC has relatively lower compressive strength than conventional

lP

structure ceramics with the value only ranges from 393 MPa to 1263MPa in quasi-static compression test [24]. The reasons for low compressive strength are related to its nano laminated structure, in which complex dislocations activities have

na

been observed in previous works. Study of oriented polycrystalline Ti3SiC2 by Barsoum et al. [25] revealed that room temperature compressive deformation started

ur

with the generation and motion of dislocations in basal planes which could further be organized in arrays or walls. Dislocation structure of typical low-angle boundary

Jo

associated with kink band was reported by Farber et al. [26] in room temperature deformed sample of Ti3SiC2. Guitton et al. conducted compression experiments of Ti2AlN under confining gas pressure at room temperature and reported dislocation reactions in MAX phases for the first time [27]. Footprints of a high lattice friction were also observed in the work of Guitton et al. [27] and were detailed by Gouriet et al. [28] with first-principles calculations and a Peierls–Nabarro model. Moreover Guitton et al. [29] also reported out-of-basal-plane dislocations interaction and slip

from basal plane to prismatic or pyramidal planes. Additional deform mechanisms including lamellar kinking, delamination [30-32] were also related to dislocation activities. The significant influence of grain microstructure and orientation on dislocation activity was noticed by investigators much latter. Bei et al. first reported the important contribution of grain shape and orientation relative to the compression axis [33] to compressive strength. Their results showed that grain microstructure played a vital role in the compressive deformation process. Then Jones et al. [34] reported that residual strains were compressive in grains with a low Schmid factor and

ro of

tensile in grains with a high Schmid factor. In situ compression tests combined with neutron diffraction performed on Ti2AlN by Guitton et al. [35] revealed that lamellar grains parallel to compression axis remain elastic while lamellar grains perpendicular

to compression deform plastically, and a Baushinger effect was also proposed in that

-p

work. According to all the research works concerning compressive deformation

behaviors above, deformation of individual grains depends on grain orientation and

re

load direction. The grains of high Schmid factors especially 45° to the loading direction in compression test first reach the critical shear stress and deform [36].

lP

Basing on the above results, we suppose a method by texturing grains to a preferred orientation to achieve high compressive strength of polycrystalline Ti2AlC.

na

In addition to compressive strength, the fracture toughness of MAX phases could also be improved by texturing methods. One major breakthrough comes from texturing of MAX phases by strong magnetic field alignment followed by spark

ur

plasma sintering (SPS). This method has been proven to be very effective in boosting the fracture toughness of MAX phases including Nb4AlC3 [37-39], Ti3SiC2 [40] and

Jo

Ti3AlC2 [41]. Encouraging results in fabricating textured MAX phases in recent years also focused on deforming MAX phases in SPS facilities [42-44]. However, a simple and more efficient fabrication method, i.e, hot pressing (HP) sintering, by which load induced grain texture in MAX phases was first realized [3], attracted less attention. Recently, we developed a new method to fabricate textured Ti2AlC ceramic by utilizing the effect of loose packed nano flake (NF) powders aligning their basal planes perpendicular to load direction (//c-axis) when they are pressed and deformed.

In light of the degree of texture, this method is comparable to spark plasma sintering. This fabrication route can reduce the requirements for texturing equipment and scale up engineering fabrication. MAX phases (Ti2AlC in particular) are also characterized by low hardness and flexural strength, which limit their structural and wear applications [7]. One effective method to reinforce MAX phases is to add high hardness and modulus Al2O3 to increase their hardness and strength [45, 46]. In addition, other benefits include remarkable chemical stability in MAX phases and compatible thermal expansion

ro of

coefficient can also be obtained. The results showed that addition of Al2O3 could improve mechanical properties and wear resistance of MAX phases [47-49]. Moreover

the reinforcing effect is more pronounce by decreasing the ceramic particle sizes [50]. Previous studies reported that the highest and lowest values of the compressive

-p

strength correspond to Ti2AlC samples with the largest and smallest grain sizes, respectively. Therefore, it is worth trying to refine the grain size to nano level. In this

re

work, coarse grain (CG) Ti2AlC powders were ball milled to 200 nm reactively in oxygen containing atmosphere to in-situ synthesize nano scale dispersive Al2O3 phase,

grain (TG) composites.

na

2. Experimental

lP

and partially transforming into Ti3AlC2 in the sintering process leading to textured

2.1. Fabrication process

ur

A schematic representation of the fabrication process for oriented Ti2AlC nano layer composites is demonstrated in Fig. 1. The Ti2AlC coarse grain bulks at the

Jo

beginning of the fabrication process were synthesized by HP sintering. To fabricate Ti2AlC coarse grain bulks, intermetallic TiAl powders (99.5 wt%, -300 mesh) and TiC powders (99 wt%, 2-4 m) were used as raw materials. A molar ratio of TiAl: 0.95TiC was adopted. These raw materials were fully mixed and filled into a graphite die, which was loaded to a vacuum HP sintering furnace. High purity Ti2AlC coarse grain bulks were obtained by sintering the mixture at 1400 °C for 2 h at 30 MPa in an argon atmosphere. The as-sintered Ti2AlC bulk products were machined to remove surface

contaminants. The bulk was then crushed and sieved to collect coarse grain powders (Fig. 2 (a)) with average diameter of 40 μm. The coarse grain powders were used to fabricate Ti2AlC nano flakes. In this work, we utilized a self-made gas reactive ball milling machine to bring about Ti2AlC lamellar kinking and delamination in grains. Ti2AlC coarse grain powders disintegrated to nano flakes as the damages accumulated. Reactive gas with volume ratio of O2:Ar=1:4 was used to facilitate disintegration of Ti2AlC grains and introduce oxygen to Ti2AlC nano flakes, which were converted into in-situ synthesized nano dispersive Al2O3 phase. The milling process was conducted at

ro of

500 rpm with Si3N4 balls and jar for 48 h in dispersant of ethanol. Then the slurry with Ti2AlC nano flakes of 200 nm and concentration of 30 wt% was dried in an oven

to obtain powders (Fig. 2 (b)). The textured Ti2AlC composites were fabricated by HP

condition for 2h at 1200 °C and 30 MPa. 2.2. Characterization

-p

sintering process by densifying and rearranging the nano flakes under vacuum

re

In order to determine phase contents and degrees of texture, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all samples were recorded on a diffractometer (Rigaku Smartlab

lP

Japan) with Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA. The scanning speed was set at 2°/min and 0.02° per step for all samples in XRD. Quantitative analysis of XRD

na

patterns to retrieve phase contents information was based on Rietveld refinement method. A software of MAUD [51, 52] was used in XRD quantitative analysis. Grain orientation and phase distribution maps were constructed by electron backscattered

ur

diffraction (EBSD, TESCAN MAIA3, Czech) technique for information of phase morphology and orientation relationships. Before EBSD analysis, surface stress of

Jo

samples was eliminated by vibratory polishing and etching of broad argon ion beam milling (LEICA, EM RES102, Germany). Scanning electron microscope (SEM, TESCAN MAIA3, Czech) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, OXFORD X-MaxN, UK) was also used for microstructures characterization. A laser diffraction analyzer (Mastersizer2000, Malvern, UK) was used to measure powder particle size. The Archimedes method was used for density measurement. The analysis of oxygen concentration was done by O/N/H analyzer (LECO TCH600,

USA). Image analysis of grain size and phase content was performed with Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. A universal testing machine (INSTRON 5582, USA) was employed for room temperature mechanical property testing. Cylindrical samples with dimensions of 6 mm in diameter and 9 mm in height were used in compression test. Three-point bending method with single edge notched beam (SENB) samples (2 mm × 4 mm × 20 mm) was used for fracture toughness measurement. Fracture toughness notches in samples were around 2 mm deep and 0.1 mm wide with a 16 mm testing span. Three-point bending test samples (2 mm × 2 mm × 20 mm) with the same span

ro of

were also used for flexural strength measurement. A hardness indenter (LECO AMH 43, USA) was used to measure microhardness of all samples.

3. Results and discussion

-p

3.1. Effects of sintering temperature on microstructures

EBSD characterization of Ti2AlC coarse grain bulks fabricated in this work

re

shows that it contains around 3.6 vol% of TiAlx as impurity phase. The average grain size, based on more than 100 individual grains on the band contrast map of EBSD

lP

characterization, is 16.0  11.1 μm in length and 6.5  3.6 μm in thickness. Fig. 2 shows the SEM images of Ti2AlC coarse grain powders which is crushed and sieved from bulks and Ti2AlC nano flakes obtained from reactive milling process. Apparently

na

the Ti2AlC coarse grain powders are dense and polycrystalline with multiple facets. In some coarse grains we could observe cleavage steps. These cleavage steps stem from

ur

the nanolaminated structure and the growth of (0001) basal planes which give Ti2AlC coarse grain flake-like substructure. Those flake-like substructures would disintegrate

Jo

in subsequent reactive ball milling process and produce large quantities of Ti2AlC nano flakes.

In order to study the densifying and texturing process of the nano flakes in the

HP sintering and to evaluate the effect of sintering temperature, we investigated bulks sintered at 1000, 1100 and 1200 °C by SEM and XRD characterization. Fig. 3 reveals the microstructure of bulk samples sintered at 1000 and 1100 °C. It is clear that the Ti2AlC phase retained its nano powder structure at 1000 °C with intact spindle-shaped

Ti2AlC phase. The relative density of samples sintered at 1000 °C reached 76.8% of the sample sintered at 1200 °C. With sintering temperature increased to 1100 °C, diffusion in Ti2AlC nano powder becomes active and powder particles are fused together. The relative density of samples sintered at 1100 °C improved to 89.6% of the sample sintered at 1200°C. Fig. 4 shows SEM images of polished and fractured surface of TSS sample sintered at 1200 °C. SEM image of polished surface shows the sample sintered at 1200 °C is fully dense with micro-pores that exist in 1000 and 1100 °C sintered

ro of

samples completely removed. In Fig. 4(a) the dark dispersive particles were identified as Al2O3 grains by EDS method, while light contrast with spindle-shape still can be

observed is Ti2AlC. In the fractured surface of Fig. 4(b), those plate-like MAX phase

grains are delaminated in trans-granular mode with angular-grained Al2O3 particles

-p

exist between the lamellas. We could note that the basal planes of most MAX phase

3.2. Phase evolution and texture

re

grains are perpendicular to the c-axis manifesting its highly textured nature.

XRD patterns were presented in Fig. 5(a) and (b). The JCPDS files we used for

lP

XRD phase identification and calculation were the following: #29-0095 for Ti2AlC, #52-0875 for Ti3AlC2 and #10-0173 for Al2O3. The results show that the raw Ti2AlC

na

coarse grain powders we fabricated are of high purity. Impurity phase peaks which belong to TiC and Ti3AlC2 that commonly exist in commercial Ti2AlC were not discernible. For this study high purity Ti2AlC as root material is particularly important

ur

to discriminate phase changes in following fabrication process. The peak zone in the 2θ of 37.5° to 41° of all results in Fig. 5 was enlarged to illustrate subsequent phase

Jo

peak changes more clearly. In the enlarged zone of Fig. 5(a), the first obvious peak change comes from the diffraction peaks of Ti2AlC nano flakes, which broadened due to grain size effect. Ti2AlC coarse grain powder diffraction pattern shows (103) plane as the main peak and (006) plane as secondary while in the same zone of Ti2AlC nano flakes only one gentle single-peak was observed. In the enlarged zone, diffraction peak changes for TSS and TTS samples are complicated. First, both (103) and (006) peak of Ti2AlC reemerged in TTS sample sintered at 1000 °C, suggesting that

recrystallization initiated at 1000 °C. Secondly, results of TSS samples sintered at 1000 °C only showed (103) peak while (006) peak almost disappeared, which means that some degrees of texturing exists. But the texturing is not strong enough to cover (103) plane and other {hk0} planes in TTS sample considering the intensity of (103) plane is usually five times stronger than (006) plane. In Fig. 5(b), it seems that there is little difference between samples sintered at 1100 °C and 1000 °C. However, for samples sintered at 1200 °C, strong Ti3AlC2 (referred as 312 in Fig. 5 enlarged zone) peak emerged in both TSS and TTS samples indicating some of the Ti2AlC flakes

ro of

transformed into Ti3AlC2 during the sintering process. Moreover, peak intensity exhibited intense preference with Ti2AlC (103) and Ti3AlC2 (104) almost disappeared

in TTS sample. And the Ti2AlC (006) and Ti3AlC2 (008) disappeared in TSS sample. The explanation for the above phenomenon is that both TSS and TTS samples are

-p

highly textured which is confirmed by the peaks of other planes in the Fig. 5(b) with

decreased dramatically in TTS sample.

re

{00l} peaks almost disappeared in TSS sample and the peak intensity of {hk0}

In order to assess the degree of texture, the Lotgering orientation factor (𝑓l ) was

lP

calculated by the equation of 𝑓l = (𝑃 − 𝑃0 ) / (1 − 𝑃0 ). In the calculation of 𝑓(00𝑙) , 𝑃 and 𝑃0 were the ratio of Σ𝐼(0 0 𝑙)/ Σ𝐼(ℎ 𝑘 𝑙) in textured samples and standard

na

JCPDS sample respectively. For calculation of 𝑓(ℎ𝑘0) , 𝑃 and 𝑃0 were replaced by the ratio of Σ𝐼(ℎ𝑘0)/ Σ𝐼(ℎ 𝑘 𝑙) correspondingly. Σ𝐼(0 0 𝑙), Σ𝐼(ℎ𝑘0) and Σ𝐼(ℎ 𝑘 𝑙)

ur

are the sums of the peak intensities of the (0 0 l), (h k 0) and (h k l) planes from XRD patterns. The Lotgering orientation factor of Ti2AlC for {00l} planes in TTS and

Jo

Ti3AlC2 {00l} planes in TTS is 0.74 and 0.49, respectively, suggesting that Ti2AlC grains are more concentrated along c-axis than Ti3AlC2 grains. Al2O3 was not observed in the XRD patterns in both NF samples and sintered samples, possibly due to its main peaks overlapping with those of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2. 3.3. Crystal orientation and phase distribution Further investigations of phase composition and grain orientations were carried out by employing EBSD techniques. The constructed orientation and phase

distribution map of grains on both TTS and TSS planes are shown in Fig. 6 in which grain colors differ according to their crystal orientations. By examining grain orientation maps (Fig. 6(a) and (c)) with the phase distribution maps (Fig. 6(b) and (d)), the red grains in grain orientation maps are determined Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 phases whose [0001] crystal orientation is parallel to c-axis. This means both Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 grains are textured with {0001} planes normal to c-axis. Interestingly, some grains show a mixture of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2. Apparently Ti3AlC2 has been transformed from Ti2AlC nano flakes due to that fact that Ti2AlC flakes became

ro of

unstable with Al atoms diffuse away and are oxidized to form Al2O3 phase [53]. Then a portion of Ti2AlC flakes transformed into Ti3AlC2 in the sintering process as the amount of Al vacancy increases. Evidence for this kind of order-to-disorder phase

transformation was uncovered by scanning transmission electron microscopy

-p

investigation recently [23].

EBSD characterizations also confirm the presence of α-Al2O3 phase with the red

re

grain in Fig. 6(b) and (d). Nevertheless it is still a challenge to find the orientation relationships of such small grains on EBSD map so we give the TTS sample’s

lP

corresponding pole figures of each phase in Fig. 7. It is evident that Ti3AlC2 {0001} and Ti2AlC {0001} are parallel (the white circles in Fig. 7). The above two phases can

na

intergrowth with each other with the relationship of (0001) Ti3AlC2 // (0001) Ti2AlC [54]. Al2O3 phase looks also textured with {0001} plane normal to c-axis but two independent directions were observed. Regular crystallographic orientations reported

ur

in previous studies [55] of (110) α-Al2O3 // (001) Ti2AlC and (110) α-Al2O3 // (11̅ 0) Ti2AlC in early oxidation stages were not observed in this work. The orientation

Jo

relationships of (0001) Ti3AlC2 and (0001) Ti2AlC parallel to (0001) α-Al2O3 were reported in MAX phase films [56]. And the orientation relationship between Al2O3 oxide scale and Ti3AlC2 substrate was (0001) Ti3AlC2 // (0001) α-Al2O3 [57]. So the orientation relationship of (0001) Ti2AlC // (0001) Ti3AlC2 // (0001) α-Al2O3 is highly likely in this work. SEM image of Fig. 4(a) shows the microstructure of TSS sample sintered at 1200 °C, in which the dark dispersive phase was identified as Al2O3 grain by EDS method. In order to quantify the diameter and content of Al2O3 phase we

performed image analysis on SEM images. The result is that the average diameter of Al2O3 grains is around 210 nm. That is the primary reason that XRD characterization failed to detect Al2O3 phase. The peak intensity of XRD diffraction reduced dramatically with nano grain effect. Moreover main peaks of Al2O3 (104) and (113) planes were overlap respectively with Ti3AlC2 (102) and Ti2AlC (104) peaks. Image analysis based on EBSD band contrast map of TSS plane shows that the mean length of MAX phase gains is 1.09  0.64 μm and the mean thickness is 0.37  0.16 μm. According to SEM image analysis, the volume fraction of Al2O3 phase is 9.6 vol.%

ro of

(9.3 wt%), which was supported by chemical analysis result with 4.2 wt% O detected. The Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 phase fraction was estimated by EBSD phase calculation as around 60 wt% and 30 wt% respectively, agreeing well with those obtained by XRD quantitative analysis.

-p

3.4. Mechanical properties and strengthening mechanism

Polycrystalline Ti2AlC with such textured microstructure is expected to possess

re

some unusual mechanical properties. It is interesting to see if the predicted property improvement is realized over conventional coarse grain Ti2AlC. Typical mechanical

lP

properties are listed in Table 1. Results for anisotropic TG samples are classified by the test load direction being parallel and perpendicular to c-axis. Because a small

na

portion Al element turned into Al2O3 phase, and Ti2AlC becomes unstable and transformed to Ti3AlC2 phase (4.24 g/cm3), the density of TG composite (4.15 g/cm3) is outweighed pure CG samples (4.10 g/cm3). The average fracture toughness is 8.5

ur

MPa m1/2 (//c-axis) and 8.2 MPa m1/2 (⊥c-axis), about 30% higher than untextured CG samples (6.2 MPa m1/2). Improvement of toughness partially comes from in-situ

Jo

formed Al2O3 particles which could deflect and blunt cracks [41]. Plate grains pulling-out and bridging cracks could also increase fracture toughness. However the fracture toughness values parallel and perpendicular to c-axis are so close. This may result from the morphology of sintered Ti2AlC grains being spindle like rather than thin flakes. Therefore effects of crack deflecting and bridging are not so anisotropic. Compressive strength of textured composites exceeds 2 GPa, more than 3 times the value of pure CG samples, which is the highest compressive strength for Ti2AlC and

Ti2AlC composites. Flexural strength is almost 2 times of those of the untextured CG samples. Compared to untextured CG samples, hardness of TG composite samples also increased with the value parallel to c-axis (7.9 GPa) being slightly higher than that vertical to c-axis (6.8 GPa). SEM images in Fig. 8(a) and (b) are Vickers hardness indentations (10 N) of TTS and TSS surface. Apparently the indentation on TTS plane is square while indentation on TSS plane is rhombic. The diagonal length of indent along c-axis exceeds diagonal length perpendicular to the c-axis. Moreover delamination and local fracture were only observed along the direction parallel to

ro of

c-axis, demonstrating its anisotropic mechanical response of textured microstructure.

4. Conclusion

Textured composite containing Ti2AlC, Ti3AlC2 and Al2O3 has been successfully

-p

fabricated with {00l} planes of Ti2AlC and Ti3AlC2 being highly oriented and vertical to c-axis. Such microstructure is designed according to a number of strengthening

re

mechanisms, including blocking the deformation of Ti2AlC, Hall-Petch relationship of grain size, and particulate reinforcement. The Lotgering orientation factor of Ti2AlC

lP

and Ti3AlC2 {00l} planes in TTS reaches 0.74 and 0.49, respectively, suggesting that the basal planes normal to Ti2AlC grains are more concentrated than Ti3AlC2 grains around c-axis. The orientation relationships of (0001) Ti2AlC // (0001) Ti3AlC2 //

na

(0001) α-Al2O3 are possible. The as-fabricated material showed toughness of 8.5 MPa m1/2 (//c-axis), compressive strength of 2037 MPa (//c-axis), flexural strength of 735

ur

MPa (//c-axis) and high hardness of 7.9 GPa (//c-axis). The synthesis temperature is reduced to 1200 °C due to high surface energy of nano flakes serving as driving force

Jo

to reduce sintering temperature, which is substantially lower than normal HP synthesis temperature of 1400 °C. This work provides a new method to fabricate highly textured Ti2AlC bulks with improved mechanical properties by HP sintering, offering a route for fabricating highly textured MAX phases different from the mainstream SPS method.

References

[1] M.W. Barsoum, D. Brodkin, T. ElRaghy, Scr. Mater. 36 (1997) 535-541. [2] T. ElRaghy, A. Zavaliangos, M.W. Barsoum, S.R. Kalidindi, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1997) 513-516. [3] M.W. Barsoum, T. El-Raghy, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30 (1999) 363-369. [4] M.W. Barsoum, Prog. Solid State Chem. 28 (2000) 201-281. [5] M.W. Barsoum, M. Radovic, in: D.R. Clarke, P. Fratzl (Eds.), Annual Review of Materials Research, Vol. 41, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 2011, pp. 195-227. [6] X.H. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 3141-3149.

ro of

[7] J.X. Chen, Y.C. Zhou, Scr. Mater. 50 (2004) 897-901. [8] I.M. Low, S.K. Lee, B.R. Lawn, M.W. Barsoum, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81 (1998) 225-228. [9] X.H. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Oxid. Met. 59 (2003) 303-320.

-p

[10] X.H. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003) 891-907.

[11] V.D. Jovic, B.M. Jovic, S. Gupta, T. El-Raghy, M.W. Barsoum, Corros. Sci. 48

re

(2006) 4274-4282.

[12] Z.J. Lin, M.S. Li, J.Y. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Scr. Mater. 58 (2008) 29-32.

159 (2012) C90.

lP

[13] S. Basu, N. Obando, A. Gowdy, I. Karaman, M. Radovic, J. Electrochem. Soc.

na

[14] G.M. Song, Y.T. Pei, W.G. Sloof, S.B. Li, J.T.M. De Hosson, S. van der Zwaag, Scr. Mater. 58 (2008) 13-16.

[15] S.B. Li, G.M. Song, K. Kwakernaak, S. van der Zwaag, W.G. Sloof, J. Eur.

ur

Ceram. Soc. 32 (2012) 1813-1820.

[16] W.G. Sloof, R.Z. Pei, S.A. McDonald, J.L. Fife, L. Shen, L. Boatemaa, A.S.

Jo

Farle, K. Yan, X. Zhang, S. van der Zwaag, P.D. Lee, P.J. Withers, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 23040.

[17] H.J. Yang, Y.T. Pei, J.C. Rao, J.T.M. De Hosson, S.B. Li, G.M. Song, Scr. Mater. 65 (2011) 135-138. [18] K.R. Whittle, M.G. Blackford, R.D. Aughterson, S. Moricca, G.R. Lumpkin, D.P. Riley, N.J. Zaluzec, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 4362-4368. [19] D.J. Tallman, E.N. Hoffman, E.N. Caspi, B.L. Garcia-Diaz, G. Kohse, R.L.

Sindelar, M.W. Barsoum, Acta Mater. 85 (2015) 132-143. [20] C.X. Wang, T.F. Yang, J.R. Xiao, S.S. Liu, J.M. Xue, J.Y. Wang, Q. Huang, Y.G. Wang, Acta Mater. 98 (2015) 197-205. [21] D.J. Tallman, L. He, B.L. Garcia-Diaz, E.N. Hoffman, G. Kohse, R.L. Sindelar, M.W. Barsoum, J. Nucl. Mater. 468 (2016) 194-206. [22] C.X. Wang, T.F. Yang, C.L. Tracy, J.R. Xiao, S.S. Liu, Y. Fang, Z.F. Yan, W. Ge, J.M. Xue, J. Zhang, J.Y. Wang, Q. Huang, R.C. Ewing, Y.G. Wang, Acta Mater. 144 (2018) 432-446.

ro of

[23] C.X. Wang, T.F. Yang, C.L. Tracy, C.Y. Lu, H. Zhang, Y.J. Hu, L.M. Wang, L. Qi, L. Gu, Q. Huang, J. Zhang, J.Y. Wang, J.M. Xue, R.C. Ewing, Y.G. Wang, Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 622.

[24] R. Benitez, H. Gao, M. O'Neal, P. Lovelace, G. Proust, M. Radovic, Acta Mater.

-p

143 (2018) 130-140.

[25] M.W. Barsoum, L. Farber, T. El-Raghy, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30 (1999)

re

1727-1738.

[26] L. Farber, I. Levin, M.W. Barsoum, Philos. Mag. Lett. 79 (1999) 163-170.

lP

[27] A. Guitton, A. Joulain, L. Thilly, C. Tromas, Philos. Mag. 92 (2012) 4536-4546. [28] K. Gouriet, P. Carrez, P. Cordier, A. Guitton, A. Joulain, L. Thilly, C. Tromas,

na

Philos. Mag. 95 (2015) 2539-2552.

[29] A. Guitton, A. Joulain, L. Thilly, C. Tromas, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 6358. [30] M.W. Barsoum, T. Zhen, A. Zhou, S. Basu, S.R. Kalidindi, Phys. Rev. B 71

ur

(2005) 8.

[31] A.G. Zhou, M.W. Barsoum, J. Alloys Compd. 498 (2010) 62-70.

Jo

[32] A.G. Zhou, S. Basu, G. Friedman, P. Finkel, O. Yeheskel, M.W. Barsoum, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 094105. [33] G.P. Bei, A. Guitton, A. Joulain, V. Brunet, S. Dubois, L. Thilly, C. Tromas, Philos. Mag. 93 (2013) 1784-1801. [34] N.G. Jones, C. Humphrey, L.D. Connor, O. Wilhelmsson, L. Hultman, H.J. Stone, F. Giuliani, W.J. Clegg, Acta Mater. 69 (2014) 149-161. [35] A. Guitton, S. Van Petegem, C. Tromas, A. Joulain, H. Van Swygenhoven, L.

Thilly, Appl Phys Lett. 104 (2014) 5. [36] R. Benitez, W.H. Kan, H. Gao, M. O'Neal, G. Proust, M. Radovic, Acta Mater. 105 (2016) 294-305. [37] C. Hu, Y. Sakka, T. Nishimura, S. Guo, S. Grasso, H. Tanaka, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 12 (2011) 044603. [38] C. Hu, Y. Sakka, H. Tanaka, T. Nishimura, S. Grasso, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 (2011) 410-415. [39] C.F. Hu, Y. Sakka, S. Grasso, T. Nishimura, S.Q. Guo, H. Tanaka, Scr. Mater. 64

ro of

(2011) 765-768. [40] C.F. Hu, Y. Sakka, S. Grasso, T. Suzuki, H. Tanaka, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 (2011) 742-748.

[41] H.B. Zhang, C.F. Hu, K. Sato, S. Grasso, M. Estili, S.Q. Guo, K. Morita, H.

-p

Yoshida, T. Nishimura, T.S. Suzuki, M.W. Barsoum, B.N. Kim, Y. Sakka, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35 (2015) 393-397.

re

[42] X. Duan, L. Shen, D. Jia, Y. Zhou, S. van der Zwaag, W.G. Sloof, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35 (2015) 1393-1400.

lP

[43] T. Lapauw, K. Vanmeensel, K. Lambrinou, J. Vleugels, Scr. Mater. 111 (2016) 98-101.

na

[44] Y. Liu, Y. Li, F. Li, H. Cui, Y. Pu, S. Guo, Z. Shi, Scr. Mater. 136 (2017) 55-58. [45] Y.M. Luo, S.Q. Li, J. Chen, R.G. Wang, J.Q. Li, W. Pan, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85 (2002) 3099-3101.

ur

[46] H.J. Wang, Z.H. Jin, Y. Miyamoto, Ceram. Int. 28 (2002) 931-934. [47] A. Li, Y. Zhou, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 (2010) 4110-4114.

Jo

[48] C.L. Yeh, C.W. Kuo, Y.C. Chu, J. Alloys Compd. 494 (2010) 132-136. [49] M. Zarezadeh Mehrizi, R. Beygi, J. Alloys Compd. 740 (2018) 118-123. [50] D. Gu, G. Meng, C. Li, W. Meiners, R. Poprawe, Scr. Mater. 67 (2012) 185-188. [51] L. Lutterotti, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 268 (2010) 334-340. [52] L. Lutterotti, S. Matthies, H.R. Wenk, A.S. Schultz, J.W. Richardson, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 594-600. [53] J. Wang, Y. Zhou, T. Liao, J. Zhang, Z. Lin, Scr. Mater. 58 (2008) 227-230.

[54] X.L. Ma, Y.L. Zhu, X.H. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Philos. Mag. 84 (2004) 2969-2977. [55] J.C. Rao, Y.T. Pei, H.J. Yang, G.M. Song, S.B. Li, J.T.M. De Hosson, Acta Mater. 59 (2011) 5216-5223. [56] H. Hogberg, L. Hultman, J. Emmerlich, T. Joelsson, P. Eklund, J.M. Molina-Aldareguia, J.P. Palmquist, O. Wilhelmsson, U. Jansson, Surf. Coat. Technol. 193) (2005) 6-10. [57] Z.J. Lin, M.J. Zhuo, Y.C. Zhou, M.S. Li, J.Y. Wang, Scr. Mater. 54 (2006)

Acknowledgements

ro of

1815-1820.

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

China (Nos. 2017YFB0306201 and 2016YFB0701303).

Table list: Table 1 Typical physical and mechanical properties of bulks Ti2AlC coarse grain and

Sample

Density (g/cm3)

Fracture toughness (MPa m1/2)

Compressive strength (MPa)

Flexural strength (MPa)

Hardness (GPa)

CG

4.1

6.2 ± 0.4

656 ± 64

316 ± 30

4.0 ± 0.1

TG (//c-axis)

4.15

8.5 ± 0.5

2037 ± 205

TG ( ⊥ 4.15 c-axis)

8.2 ± 0.5

2003 ± 216

ro of

textured grain composite samples.

7.9 ± 0.2

626 ± 53

6.8± 0.2

-p

re lP na ur Jo

735 ± 62

ro of

Figure list:

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of fabrication process for highly textured Ti2AlC

na

lP

re

-p

composite ceramic.

Fig. 2. SEM images of the Ti2AlC coarse grain powder (a), and nano flake powder

Jo

ur

(b).

Fig. 3. SEM micrograph of fractured TSS surface from samples sintered at 1000°C (a),

ro of

and 1100°C (b).

Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of samples sintered at 1200 °C. (a) Polished TSS plane of textured composite ceramic. The dark contrast indicates Al2O3 phase. (b) SEM image

na

lP

re

-p

of fractured surface of TSS plane of textured composite ceramic.

Fig. 5. (a) XRD patterns of the Ti2AlC coarse grain powders (CG), ball milling

ur

produced nano flakes (NF), textured top surface (1000 °C-TTS) and textured side surface (1000 °C-TSS) of a sample sintered at 1000 °C. (b) textured top surface

Jo

(1100 °C-TTS) and textured side surface (1100 °C -TSS) of a sample sintered at 1100 °C, textured top surface (1200 °C-TTS) and textured side surface (1200 °C-TSS) of a sample sintered at 1200 °C.

ro of

-p

Fig. 6. Grain orientation and phase distribution map. Inverse pole figure (IPF) map in z-axis of TTS plane (a) and IPF map in y-axis of TSS plane (c) indicating grain

re

orientations. Corresponding phase distribution map of TTS plane (b) and TSS plane

Jo

ur

na

lP

(d).

Fig. 7. Pole figures corresponding to Fig. 6(a), of Ti2AlC, the Ti3AlC2 and Al2O3.

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro of

Parallel crystallographic planes of the three phases are indicated by white circles.

Fig. 8. SEM image of Vickers indentation morphologies of textured composites: (a) TTS and (b) TSS sample.