repair in the inner ear

repair in the inner ear

480 Factors controlling Hinrich Staecker* Damaged proliferation transdifferentiation the mammalian possibly, roles. Several be associated insulin...

979KB Sizes 14 Downloads 146 Views

480

Factors controlling Hinrich Staecker* Damaged

proliferation

transdifferentiation the mammalian possibly,

roles. Several

be associated insulin-like

factor

growth

factor

are important

whereas

transdifferentiation hair cells appear factors

epidermal

1 (IGF-l),

to

factor,

transforming

in the mammalian

evidence

that regeneration/repair

hair cells is possible

during

labyrinth.

growth

however,

for

for converting

in the lateral lines and inner ears of fish in the basilar papilla and vestibule of

they

have

and amphibians

Increasing

been

found

of mammals. differentiated;

to regenerate

[2], as well as in birds

in fish [l]

[3,4] (‘l’able

1).

of mammalian period

DNA-labeling

studies

of the avian

inner

ear have

sho\vn

that a spontaneous turnover of hair cells takes place in the vestibule but not in the auditory papilla [.5], However, in neonatal chick, damage to auditory hair cells

at later times.

Addresses *Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA iDepartments of Otolaryngology and Neuroscience, Kennedy Center, Room 302, Department of Otolaryngology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1410 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, New York 10461, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Neurobiology

ear are responsible

(e.g. sound pressure or acceleration) energy (i.e. neurotransmission). Hair

birds, and in the the cochlea and vestibule Hair cells of the inner ear are terminally

growth

the early neonatal

and may exist to a very limited degree

of the inner

mechanical energy into electrochemical cells are present and amphibians,

insulin,

for avian inner ear regeneration/repair, growth

c(, insulin, IGF-1, and IGF-2 are important

auditory

Hair cells

and, to play

process:

and fibroblast

regeneration/repair suggests

The ability to perceive sound and a sense of balance are important for orienting us within our environment.

have been found

with the regeneration/repair

growth

Introduction

are replaced

cells and

cells into hair cells. In

system,

the repair of damaged

significant

papilla

of supporting

of supporting vestibular

in the inner ear

and Thomas R Van De Watefi-

hair cells in the avian basilar

by regenerative

factors

hair-cell regeneration/repair

induced through auditory

by ototoxin or sound trauma will evoke repair hair-cell regeneration, resulting in recovery of function [6]. The source of these regenerated

hair cells is debated; some evidence suggests that many of the regenerated hair cells derive from the regenerative proliferation of the supporting cells, whereas the rest result from the transdifferentiation of supporting cells [7].

1998, 8:480-487

In mammals, spontaneous hair-cell regeneration has been observed, thus far, only in the vestibule [8]. Controversy remains as to whether the vestibular hair-cell regeneration

http://biomednet.com/elecref/0959438800800480 0 Current Biology Publications ISSN 0959-4388 Abbreviations BrdU 5-bromo-2’.deoxyuridine EGF epldermal growth factor acidic flbroblast growth factor FGF-1 basic fibroblast growth factor FGF-2 IGF insulin-like growth factor polymerase chain reaction PCR PDGF platelet-derived growth factor PDGF-AA A chain homodlmer of PDGF RT reverse transcription TGFcl transforming growth factor cx

observed in the utricle is attributable to the regenerative proliferation of supporting cells or to the transdifferentiation of supporting cells, or to the repair of damaged hair cells,

or to some

combination

of these

processes.

In this review, we compare the renewal of damaged hair cell populations within the sensory epithelium of both the auditory and vestibular receptors in avian and mammalian inner ears. IVe also discuss the possible sources

Table 1 Summary

of hair-cell regeneration/repair

in different species.

-

Ongoing production of hair cells

Neuroepithelial proliferation after damage

Spontaneous hair-cell regeneration

Regenerative proliferation

Functional recovery

Amphibian and fish/ lateral line and inner ear

f

+

+

+

Not tested

Bird/basilar papilla

0

+

+

+

+

Bird/vestibule

+

+

+

+

+

Mammal/cochlea

0

+ (postnatal)

0

0

0

Mammal/vestibule

?

+

+ (limited)

?

?

Species/sensory receptors

in the inner ear

Factors controlling hair-cell regeneration/repair

of regenerated

hair cells:

regenerative

proliferation;

Avian hair-cell

trans-

differentiation; and/or repair (see Figure 1). Finally, we report on recent studies characterizing the factors that influence the hair cell renewal process in these avian and mammalian

One

of

the

main

aims

of

regeneration

work

continues to be to identify where new hair cells come from. Evidence supports three different suggested modes of hair-cell renewal following injury (see Figure 1): regenerative proliferation of supporting cells; transdifferentiation of supporting cells; and repair of damaged hair cells. Proof of the active participation of one of these modes of hair-cell renewal does not exclude the possibility that either or both of the other modes also contributes to the hair-cell regeneration/repair following an insult to a specific hair-cell population the inner

actively process within

ear.

In sound-traumatized

chickens

regenerated

are labeled

hair cells

[9] and quails by tritiated

[lo], many thymidine,

the damaged papillae lost hair cells. After hair cells, Bhave et

nl. [l l] immunostained chick cochleae using cell-cycle markers and noted that although all the cells of the sensory epithelium left the Go phase (i.e. the quiescent phase), only those cells within the area of hair-cell loss

of hair cells

hair-cell

481

and Van De Water

regeneration

suggesting that cell division within is a major source for replacing administering otoroxin to damage

labyrinths.

Repair versus regeneration

Staecker

entered S (synthesis) phase evidence for regeneration

and underlvent mitosis. Direct of hair cells from supporting

cells has, thus far, been demonstrated lateral line neuromasts [ 121.

By using mitosis, damage take They

cytosine

arabinoside

(ara

only for amphibian

C),

an

inhibitor

place in observed

the absence this in both

of supporting cell mitosis. ototoxinand sound-trauma-

Figure 1

(a) Re-enter

AllI

Daughter cells

h

G---Ill”

-

Prollferatlon of supportIng

cells

n /I 4

I

(b) Transdifferentiatlon of supporting

cells

3

(c) Repair of injured hair cells

(e.g. oxidative

of

Adler and Raphael [13,14] found that following to the basilar papilla, hair-cell regeneration can

stress)

Schematic representation of the three different processes that may contribute to sensory ear: (a) regenerative proliferation of supportlng cells; (b) transdifferentiation of supporting HS98, Thomas R Van De Water and Hinrich Staecker, 1998.

3

TRV and HS98

hair-cell regeneration/repair within the vertebrate inner cells; and (c) repair of injured hair cells. TRV and

482

Sensory systems

damaged

basilar

papilla,

regeneration response similar. Further support

suggesting to these for these

that

the

hair-cell

pathological insults is findings comes from the

work of Roberson [15], who implanted an intracochlear canula that constantly infused tritiated thymidine into gentamicin-treated chicks. A single dose of gentamicin caused a near total the papilla; however,

loss of hair cells in the base of the regenerated hair cells were not

labeled, indicating that transdifferentiation cells contributes to hair-cell regeneration

of supporting in the avian inner

ear [15].

However,

at present,

that macrophages either regeneration [22*].

there

initiate

Factors influencing

is no direct or

modulate

evidence hair-cell

hair-cell renewal

It is important and factors

to identify and characterize the processes that can influence the hair cell renenal process,

including cellular events (e.g. re-entry of supporting cells into the cell cycle), cell interactions (e.g. migration of macrophages into the site of hair cell damage), expression of growth factor receptors in response to sensory epithelium damage (e.g. the epidermal growth factor

Mammalian The

aiuo [ll].

hair-cell

process

of

renewal/repair

hair-cell

inner ear has not yet been of regenerated hair cells

renewal

in

the

mammalian

fully characterized. Evidence labeled with S-bromo-2’-de-

oxyuridine (BrdU), or tritiated thymidine, in utricular cultures is sparse. Warchol et (I/. [Ih] have identified labeled hair cells in gcntamicin-damaged guinea pig utricular explants; however, judging from the number of regenerated hair cells present and the overall paucity of labeling, plausible

transdifferentiation source for most

utricular

explants

of supporting cells is the most of the ne\v hair cells in these

[EGF] receptor), and ear sensory epithelium Understanding these avian and mammalian

responsiveness to growth

factors and how they differ between labyrinths may provide insights into

the differences in the vertebrate inner ears. Avian hair-cell

hair cell

renewal

process

in these

regeneration

Hair-cell regeneration lvas first described in avian basilar papilla, and it remains the best understood system. llsing a laser, \\:archol and Corwin [23] lesioned hair cells in basilar papilla explants with tritiated

[16,17].

of damaged inner factors (e.g. TGFcx).

explants, thymidinc.

and then labrlcd the As discussed earlier,

An alternate mode of hair-cell renewal to explain unlabeled regenerated hair cells is the repair of damaged hair cells. Sobkowicz ettul. [ 181 have demonstrated that auditory hair cells can survive the loss of their apical cytoplasm and stereocilia bundles. Analysis of these damaged hair cells shows that repair is complete within 48 h [l&19’]. This concept of hair-cell repair is also supported by structural studies that have demonstrated the role of supporting cells

only supporting cells in close proximity to the lesion entered the S phase of the cell cycle. Supporting cells in cultures of thermolysin-separated sheets of chick utricular neuroepithelium undergo spontaneous division in defined

in scar formation strongly suggest

To study further the role of cell proliferation in hair-cell renewal, markers for immature hair cells have been sought. Stone et al. [ZS] have identified tlvo markers, calmodulin and beta tubulin, that stain regenerated hair cells selectively, as well as putative early differentiating hair cells. Recent studies show that the actin filament binding protein fimbrin localizes specifically to hair cells [26,27]. In chick basilar papilla cultures, staining for fimbrin has been observed 96 h after acoustic trauma 1271.

a capacity The

modes

after ototoxic damage [ZO]. These studies that sublethally damaged hair cells have

for self-repair. of injury

in

the

experiments

cited

above

arc either laser or mechanical disruption of the cuticular plate, so it is unclear whether other modes of injury, such as damage by ototoxins or sound trauma, would lead to similar findings. [Jsing a different approach, Kelly et al. [al] ablated hair cells in organ of Corti explants with a laser to demonstrate that the degree of supporting-cell proliferation is proportional to the degree of injury, again suggesting that contact-mediated factors are important in the initiation of regeneration/repair. hlacrophages are associated with tissue regeneration in other organs, and they produce a variety of growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor ~1 (TGFa), and basic fibroblast growth Factor (bFGF, also known as FGF-2). Localized trauma to the vestibular neuroepithelium results in recruitment of macrophages to the site of injury. This recruitment phenomenon has also been observed in the amphibian lateral line [l,?], in explants of chick basilar papilla [Z’], and in traumatized vestibular epithelium its

medium, indicating that the explantation preparation techniques (e.g. thcrmolysin trigger cell proliferation [ 2-11.

and culture digestion) can

There has also been significant interest in identifying growth factors that can potentially trigger or enhance hair-cell regeneration. \Vhen normal basilar papillae are co-cultured with aminoglycoside-damaged papillac, they demonstrate increased rates of tritiated thymidinc incorporation, suggesting that a diffusible substance is being produced by the lesioned papillae, w:hich then initiates a cell proliferation response in the normal papillae [28]. In the avian system, two growth factors have been identified as stimulators of cell proliferation: insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Basilar papilla explants exposed to either of these factors show a significant mitogenic response (i.e. increased Brdll uptake). Treatment of explants with EGF, bombesin or TGFa do not significantly enhance Brdl! uptake, except

in areas

of nonsensory

epithelium

[2’S”].

A significant

advance in understanding the signaling cascade involved in the induction of hair-cell regeneration has come with the observation that induction of CAMP in cultures of avian basilar papillae stimulates the incorporation of BrdU in hair cells of uninjured basilar papilla explants [30]. This cAhlP-stimulated proliferation inhibitors of protein kinase A, which Mammalian

hair-cell

can be blocked by is regulated by cAhlP.

of guinea

rate of cell significantly

pig utricles.

proliferation lower than

TGFa

As discussed

earlier,

the

in these mammalian tissues is in avian tissues. More recently.

regeneration/repair of auditory hair cells has been in explants of three-day-old rat organ of Corti

reported explants

analysis

FGF-2

are present

has shown

in vice and that

on utricular

has also been

regeneration/repair

epithelial

implicated in neonatal

that IGF cells

utricular and FGF

hair cells receptors

[38”].

as a factor driving

hair-cell

organ of Corti cultures

[40].

The validity of these results have been questioned [41], but Zinc and de Ribaupierre [42”], using a different culture system, have recently replicated and extended these

renewal/repair

Hair-cell regeneration in mammals was first identified by Forge et al. [S] in gentamicin-treated guinea pigs and by Warchol et al. [16] in aminoglycoside-damaged explants

histochemical produce

483

in the inner ear Staecker and Van De Water

Factors controlling hair-cell regeneration/repair

results.

They

treated

organ of Corti explants 5-7 days of treatment

with with

three-day-old

postnatal

rat

1 mhl neomycin followed by either TGFcx or EGF, or a

combination of the two. Apical turns of the organ of Corti explants were removed to prevent inadvertent analysis of spared apical hair cells. Cultures treated with either TGFa or EGF, or a combination of both, showed a significant number

of regenerated/repaired

hair cells

displaying

the

damaged by administration of neomycin and then treated with retinoic acid and fetal calf serum [31]. Kelly r~

surface features of immature hair cells (see Figure ‘liitiated thymidine labeling showed cell proliferation the inner sulcus area of EGF-treated explants but

al. [Zl] have demonstrated that embryonic and neonatal cochleae replace hair cells destroyed by laser irradiation, but renewal is greatly attenuated in postnatal explants.

labeled hair cells, lending credence to the theory that these cells are derived from differentiation of a precursor cell, or transdiffcrentiation of existing supporting cells (or

Spontaneous regeneration of hair cells in the cristae of adult chinchilla has also been reported [32]. Interestingly, there is a notable difference between the ability of type I

to the repair hair cells).

and type

Regeneration/repair

II hair cells

to regenerate

[33].

Recently, cells carrying immature appearing stereocilia have been identified in the undamaged utricles of adult guinea pigs [34*]. These cells appear to represent 0.7% of the utricular hair-cell population, suggesting that some degree of hair cell replacement may be an active process in the vestibule of adult mammals [34*]. Lambert [35] has demonstrated that hair-cell regeneration takes place in adult mouse cristae and that cultures of adult mouse utricles pretreated with neomycin show an increased r3te of cell proliferation after treatment with TGFa. In combination with insulin, TGFa has also been shown to increase proliferation of cells in extrasensory epithelia and supporting cells in adult rat utricles [36]. Other studies have sho\vn that IGF-1, IGF-2, TGFa and EGF increase proliferation of utricular epithelial cells [37,38**,39]. This effect on proliferation can be inhibited by neutralizing antibodies against FGF-2 and IGF-1, suggesting that these factors may be part of the hair-cell regeneration cascade. Growth factor treatment can also enhance the process of vcstibular hair-cell regeneration/repair within the utricles of adult guinea pig inner ears exposed to vestibulotoxic levels of gentamicin (R Kopke et al., Sot h’turo.b Abs~-rr 1996, 22636.3). Infusion of a combination of TGFa, IGF-1, and retinoic acid into the perilymphatic space of the guinea pig vestibule one week post-gentamicin administration results in a significant enhancement of the regeneration/repair of the vestibular hair cells (i.e. 3- to lo-fold; the variability is site specific) and stimulates the maturation of their sensory hair bundles. Immuno-

of sublethal

damage

2). in no

to the ototoxin-damaged

of hair cells in the ototoxin-damaged,

EGF-treated explants WAS more vigorous at the middle turn, leading Zine and de Ribaupierre [42**] to speculate that more ‘undifferentiated’ precursors are present at the middle turn compared to at the basal turn. In a follo\v-up study using ELI%, these investigators (A Zinc, F de Ribaupierre, personal communication) reported an upregulation of EGF receptor expression in organ of Corti explants in response to ototoxic damage. ‘I’hus far, the regeneration/repair of Corti appears to be limited

phenomenon in the organ to in vitro studies and has

not been demonstrated in organ of Corti explants excised from rdt pups after postnatal day 5. Some evidence of a limited attempt at regeneration/repair is provided by the experiments of Lenoir and \‘ago [43.34*], who injected nine-day-old rdt pups with amikacin for seven consecutive days and then sacrificed the animals at intervals to 90 days post initiation of ototoxin injections. At 21 and 35 days after ototoxin treatment, atypical cells bearing tufts of microvilli and resembling immature hair cells were observed only in the area previously occupied by the apical outer hair cells. In the inner hair-cell area of these animals, Lenoir and Vago observed cells that had both efferent and afferent innervations but no stereocilia or cuticular plates. They hypothesize that the apical region of the rat cochlea does not reach adult morphology until after postnatal day 21 and, therefore, only a limited attempt at regeneration/repair is possible. One approach in growth factor studies has been to study cultures of supporting cells and to determine which factors

484

Sensory systems

Figure 2

Scanning a control

electron micrographs of the auditory hair-cell area of neonatal rat organ of Corti explants after 10 days in vitro. (a) Surface view of culture after 10 days in vitro, displaying well-defined rows of inner and outer hair cells, as well as normal stereociliary arrays. (b) An

ototoxin-damaged culture hair cells from the organ

(exposed for 24 h to 1 mM neomycin and then placed for 7 days in normal medium) showing complete loss of auditory of Corti. (c) Area of replacement hair cells in ototoxin-damaged cultures treated for 7 days with TGFa. Numerous

immature stereocilia bundles are visible on the apical surfaces of the replacement hair cells. Kinocilia of these replacement hair cells are found In an eccentric position at the external border of the cell (arrow). The surface of the Corti’s organ is partially hidden by the re-grown tectorial membrane (TM). (d) Higher magnification of the apical surface of a single replacement hair cell shown in (c). Hair cells like this one, with a circular bundle of closely packed immature, uniformly sized stereocilia and a longer ear of the rat. Bars=2 PM in all panels. Reproduced with permission from [42”1.

can potentially initiate their differentiation into hair cells. Initial research has focused on determining what markers, aside from the presence of actin-containing stereocilia, are specific for hair cells. A recent study by Zheng and Gao [45*] confirms that the calcium-binding protein calretinin is present in immature hair cells just after their terminal mitosis and before stereocilia bundle formation. They then set out to test if any mitotic cells in rat utricular epithelium cultures co-label with BrdU and calretinin. No double labeling U’ZISseen in partially dissociated utricular epithelium, indicating that spontaneous mitosis occurring after dissociation does not produce early hair-cell progenitors. Cultures of dissociated epithelial sheets treated with gentamicin for 2 days followed by BrdU labeling ifi vitru for 7-11 days contained a few cells that were double

kinocilium

(arrow),

are normally

found

in the developing

inner

labeled with both anti-BrdU and anti-calretinin. Control cultures never showed any double labeling, negating the possibility of dissociation-induced damage and repair of hair-cell DNA. ‘Ib study further this effect, Zheng, Lewis and Gao [46] produced conditionally immortalized utricular cpithelial cell lines that possess the morphologic characteristics of supporting cells. These immortalized utricular ccl1 lines express the same growth factor receptors found on supporting cells (i.e. EGF and FGF receptors). When cultured at a nonpermissive temperature in the prescncc of FGF-2, these cells stop proliferating, and express both calretinin and calmodulin [46]. Immortalized hair cells have also been produced from embryonic inner ear cells of

Factors controlling hair-cell regeneration/repair

the ImortomouseB for hair cells; appears

[47]. These

however,

Another

approach

are involved the cDNAs normal

auditory

involved

Growth factors and receptors organ of Cot%*.

transcription noise-damaged fication

growth

and

lesioned

auditory

for the

EGF

two-week-old performed

receptor,

fibroblast

growth

factor

chicks reverse

FGF

receptor,

(FGF-1)

mRNA

is

upregulated after basilar papilla damage. The Eph family tyrosine kinase receptor &k-l0 is also localized in the sensory epithelium [@I. A differential display PCR study of noise-damaged basilar papillae idencitied four genes that are dysregulatcd in response to this trauma [SO]: genes lated protein, GTP-binding gene. These signaling and regeneration.

that encode for parathyroid hormone reCa?+/calmodulin-regulated protein kinase II, protein CDC32 and a novel uncharacterized results suggest that CaZ+/calmodulin-related GTPase cascades may play a role in hair-cell

The use of PCR amplification of reverse transcribed mRNAs has confirmed that the FGF family of growth factors plays an important role in avian hair cell regeneration/repair, In addition, these gene amplification results have identified several other candidate factors potentially contribute to the regeneration/repair Genes

XI‘-PCR

present

in mammalian

analysis

of control

that may response.

hair cells

and

FGF-2,

IGF-1,

IGF-2,

PDGF-AA,

PDGF-BB

factor receptors EGF-R, FGF-R2, FGF-R4, IGF-1 R, PDGF-Rc(,

PDGF-Rfi

‘Modlfled

homodimer

renewal

normal papillae. Interestingly, the expression pattern of the FGF receptor changed position after noise damage: localization of immunostaining changed from the hair-cell stereocilia to the apical areas of surrounding supporting RT-PCR was used to show cells. Semi-quantitative acidic

in the mammalian

Growth

from

[51].

PDGF-BB,

factors

fundamental

regeneration/repair

IGF receptor, insulin receptor. rctinoic acid receptors B and CL,and FGF-2 are present in both noise-damaged and

that

identified

B

chain

of

PDGF;

-R, receptor.

regeneration/repair.

(RT) PCR on RNA extracted from both and normal chick basilar papillae. Ampli-

products

485

factors

has been to identify and their receptors in

Cotanche [&I exposed trauma and subsequently

sound

and Van De Water

Table 2

markers

EGF, TGFc(, FGF-I,

which

epithelium

in avian hair-cell

ear Staecker

Growth factors

to determining

undergoing

I ,ee and to

some

differentiation

studies

in regeneration/repair of growth factors

epithclium Genes

cells express morphological

to be aberrant.

Gene amplification

both

their

in the inner

neomycin-damaged

process

Several growth regeneration/repair

and modulate

auditory

response to growth IGF-1 and insulin.

the hair-cell

1).

factors that appear process have been

preliminary overview between the avian as between

that initiate

(Table

to modulate the identified, and a

indicates that there are differences and mammalian systems, as well and factors

vestibular such

hair

as FGF-2,

cells,

in their

TGFcx,

EGF,

‘I‘here also appear to be three mechanisms by which hair cells can be replaced following damage to the inner ear (Figure 1). The avian system replaces lost hair cells by both regenerative proliferation of supporting cells (with subsequent differentiation of the daughter cells into both hair cells and supporting cells), and by transdifferentiation of mature supporting cells into hair cells. Repair of damaged hair cells may also play a role in hair-cell renewal in this system, but, at present, there is no evidence to support such a repair process in the damaged avian inner ear. In mammals, hair-cell regeneration/repair processes include both transdifferentiation of mature and immature supporting cells into hair cells and self-repair of sublethal damage to the hair cells. Regeneration/repair of mammalian auditory hair cells, at present, is limited to the neonatal period, with some evidence of an unsuccessful attempt at regeneration/repair (i.e. atypical cells) at a slightly later stage of postnatal development in the cochlea of the rat. Currently, there are no experimental findings that support the participation of regenerative cell proliferation as a major participant in the replacement of lost hair cells from either the auditory or vestibular receptors of mammals.

rat

utricles has shown that receptors for IGF-1, FGF-2, EGF and PDGF-AA are present, and also suggest that the PDGF-AA and IGF-1 receptors may localize to the hair cells [jl]. The presence of mRNA for a wide variety of growth factors and growth factor receptors have also been identified in the postnatal rat cochlea (see Table 2) [52].

Conclusions Hair-cell regeneration is a rapidly developing field that has used four model systems over the past ten years-avian basilar papilla. avian utricle, mammalian organ of Corti, and mammalian utricle - in an attempt to characterize the

The challenge for future investigations will be to identify the mechanism that initiate the transdifferentiation and repair processes, and to determine the growth factors and other factors that are involved in these processes. In addition, the identification and characterization of underlying molecular changes that prevent auditory haircell regeneration/repair in the auditory system of adult mammals should prove a fruitful area of research. One final challenge to the biologists working in the area of hair-cell regeneration/repair will be to identify the differences between the hair-cell populations of the avian and mammalian inner ears that prevent regenerative proliferation

486

Sensory

(c.g.

systems

cell cycle

control

process of hair-cell mammals.

factors)

from

regeneration/repair

participating in the inner

in the ear of

Acknowledgements ‘1‘11~ prcp~rar~on of[his rcvic\v

\vas supported by the Shulsky Hearing Kcbcarch Foundation of the hlontcfiorc hlcdical Ccntcr (‘1X VXI Dc b\‘ater). ‘l‘hc ;~uthor\ thank A Chcng, a fourth year medical student, for his help in preparing Figure I, and A %inc and 1; dc Kibaupicrrc for the USC of rhc illusmtrron in Frgurc ?. LVe &o thank A Zinc. 1; de kibaupicrrc and I’ I,cfcbvre for their critic;11 commcncs. and K Impcrati for \vord processing of thus manuscripr.

References

and recommended

Papers of partrcular Interest, published have been highlighted as: . l

.

19. .

Sobkowicz HM, August BK, Slapnick SM: Cellular interaction as a response to injury in the organ of Corti in culture. Inr J Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:463-485. This study suggests that the repair of injured hair cells is more dependent on the extent of injury than on how it occurs. The authors suggest that injured hair cells may respond in a number of different ways, and they make the novel suggestion that the supporting cells provide both protectrve and trophic support to the injured cells during the repair and recovery process. 20.

Leonova EV, Raphael Y: Organization of cell junctions and cytoskeleton in the reticular lamina in normal and ototoxically damaged organ of Corti. Hear Res 1997, 113:14-28.

21.

Kelly MW, Talreja D, Corwin JT: Replacement of hair cells after laser microbeam irradiation in cultured organs of Corti from embryonic and neonatal mice. J Neurosci 1995, 15:3013-3026.

22. .

reading

within the annual period of review,

of special interest of outstanding interest

1.

Corwin JT: Postembryonic production and aging in inner ear hair cells in sharks. J Comp Neural 1981, 201:541-553.

2.

Corwin JT: Perpetual production of hair cells and maturational changes in hair cell ultrastructure accompany postembryonic growth in an amphibian ear. Proc Nat/ Acad Sci USA 1985, 82:391 l-391 5.

Warchol ME: Macrophage activity in organ cultures of the avian cochlea: demonstration of a resident population and recruitment to sites of hair cell lesions. J Neurobiol 1997, 33:724-734. This study explores the role of macrophages in response to injury of the basilar papilla in the chick. The author demonstrates recruitment of macrophages to the sate of the hair-cell lesion and suggests that macrophages have a role (i.e. they are a source of growth factors) in the initiation of the basilar papilla’s hair-cell regeneration response. 23.

Warchol ME, Corwin JT: Regenerative proliferation in organ cultures of the avian cochlea: identification of the initial progenitors and determination of the latency of the proliferation response. J Neurosci 1996, 16:5466-5477.

24.

Warchol ME: Supporting avian utricles proliferate 1995, 6:981-984.

25.

Stone JS, Leanao SG, Baker LP, Rubel EW: Hair cell differentiation in chick cochlear epithelium after aminoglycoside toxicity: in viva and in vitro observations. / Neurosci 1996, 16:6157-6174.

26.

Zine A, Hafidi A, Romand R: Fimbrin expression in the developing rat cochlea. Hear Res 1995, 87:165-l 69.

2 7.

Lee KH, Cotanche DA: Localization protein fimbrin during regeneration Audio/ Neurotol 1996, 1:41-53.

28.

Tsue T, Oesterle EC, Rubel EW: Diffusable factors regulate hair cell regeneration in the avian inner ear. Proc Nat/ Acad Sci USA 1994, 91 :I 584-l 588.

cells in isolated sensory epithelia in serum free culture. Neuroreport

of

3.

Cotanche following

4.

Cruz RM, Lamben PR, Rubel EW: Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea. Arch Ofoiaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987, 113:1058-l 062.

5.

Jorgensen JM, Mathiesen C: The avian inner ear. Continuous production of hair cells in vestibular sensory organs, but not in the auditory papilla. Narurwissenschaften 1988, 75:319-320.

6.

McFadden EA, Saunders JC: Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick. Hear Res 1989, 41:205-2 15.

7.

Cotanche DA: Hair cell regeneration in the avian cochlea. Otol Rhmol Laryngol 1997, 168(suppl):Q-15.

8.

Forge A, Li L, Corv-in JT, Nevill G: Ultrastructural evidence for hair cell regeneration in the mammalian inner ear. Science 1993, 259:1616-l 619.

9.

Cowin JT, Cotanche DA: Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma. Science 1988, 240:1772-l 774.

10.

Ryals EM, Rubel EW: Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult Coturnix quail. Science 1988, 240:1774-l 776.

Il.

Bhave SA, Stone JS, Rubel EW, Coltrera MD: Cell cycle progression in gentamicin-damaged avian cochleas. J Neurosci 1995, 15:4618-4628.

30.

Navaratnam DS, Su HS, Scott SP, Oberholtzer JC: Proliferation in the auditory receptor epithelium mediated by a cyclic AMP dependent signaling pathway. Nat Med 1996, 2:l 136-I 139.

12.

Jones JE, Corwin JT: Regeneration of sensory cells after laser ablation in the lateral line system: hair cell lineage and macrophage behavior revealed by time lapse microscopy. J Neurosci 1996, 16:649-662.

31.

Lefebvre P, Malgrange B, Staecker H, Moonen G, Van De Water TR: Retinoic acid stimulates regeneration of mammalian auditory hair cells. Science 1993, 260:692-695.

32.

13.

Adler H, Raphael Y: New hair cells arise from supporting cell conversion in the acoustically damaged chick inner ear. Neurosci Lett 1996, 205:17-20.

Tanyeri H, Lopez I, Honrubia V: Histological evidence for hair cell regeneration after ototoxic cell destruction with local application of gentamicin in the chinchilla crista ampullaris. Hear Res 1995, 89:194-202.

14.

Adler H: Further evidence for supporting cell conversion in the damaged avian basilar papilla. Int J Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:375-385.

33.

15.

Roberson D: Light microscopic evidence that direct transdifferentiation gives rise to new hair cells in regenerating avian auditory epithelium. Auditory Neurosci 1996, 2:195-205.

Lopez I, Honrubia V, Lee SC, Schoeman G, Beykirch K: Quantification of the process of hair cell loss and recovery in the chinchilla crista ampullaris after gentamicin treatment Inf J Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:447-461.

DA: Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1987, 30:181-i 95.

Ann

16.

Warchol ME, Lambert PR, Goldstein BJ, Forge A, Corwin JT: Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adult guinea pigs and humans. Science 1993, 259:161 Q-l 622.

1 7.

Li L, Forge A: Morphological evidence for supporting cell to hair cell conversion in the mammalian utricular macula. Int J Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:433-446.

18.

Sobkowicz HM, August BK, Slapnick SM: Post traumatic survival and recovery of the auditory sensory cells in culture. Acfa Otolaryngol (Sfockh) 1996, 16:257-262.

of the hair cell specific in the chicken cochlea.

29. ..

Oesterle EC, Tsue TT, Rubel EW: Induction of cell proliferation in avian inner ear sensory epithelia by insulin like growth factor 1 and insulin. J Comp Neural 1997, 380:262-274. This study convincingly demonstrates that both insulin and insulin-like growth factor type I can evoke a cell proliferation response from normal mature vestibular sensory epithelium explanted from 8- to 1 E-day-old chicks. This paper has an excellent discussion of the differences between growth-factorelicited cell proliferation responses by avian and mammalian vestibular sensory epithelp

34.

Lambert PR, Gu R, Corwin JT: Analysis of small hair bundles in the utricles of mature guinea pigs. Am J Ofol 1997, 18:637-643. inalysis of variations in the maturity of stereociliary bundle morphology In the utricles of mature guinea pigs formed the basis for these authors to put forth the intrrguing hypothesis that there is a low level of ongoing hair-cell prolrferation to replace hair cells lost to normal processes. This phenomena has been demonstrated in the vestibule of adult birds but until now has not been thought to occur actively in the vestibule of mammals, This is a potentially important observation that needs confirmation by other methodologies, 35.

Lambert PR: Inner ear hair cell regeneration in a mammal: identification of a trigger factor. Laryngoscope 1994, 104:701718.

Factors

36.

37.

controlling

Kuntz AL, Oesterle EC: TGF alpha with insulin induce proliferation in rat vestibular epithelia. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 1998, in press.

hair-cell

Head

Yamashlta H, Oesterle EC: Induction of cell proliferation in mammalian inner ear sensory epithelia by transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor. Proc Nat/ Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:3152-3155.

38. ..

Zheng JL, Helbig C, Gao WQ: Induction of cell proliferation by fibroblast and insulin like growth factors in pure rat inner ear epithelial cell cultures. J Neurosci 1997, 17:216-226. This novel approach used partially dissociated sheets of early postnatal rat utricular epithelium to screen a large number of different growth factors for their ability to initiate a cell proliferation response. Several growth factors from different families were identified as mitogens for utricular sensory epithelium in this system, with some growth factor combinations demonstrating an additive effect on the cell proliferation response of this tissue. This is a well designed and executed experimental series using blocking antibodies to confirm the growth factor effects on mitogenesis in vitro. 39.

Yamane H, Nakagawa T, lguchi H, Shibata S, Takayama M, Sunami K, Nakai Y: Triggers of hair cell regeneration in the avian inner ear. Auris Nasus Larynx 1997, 24:221-225.

40.

Staecker H, Lefebvre P, Malgrange B, Moonen G, Van De Water TR: Response to: Regeneration and mammalian auditory hair cells: technical comment Science 1995, 267:709711.

41.

Chardin S, Romand R: Regeneration and mammalian auditory hair cells: technical comment Science 1995, 267:707-709.

Zine A, de Ribaupierre F: Replacement of mammalian auditory hair cells. Neurorepoti 1998, 9:263-268. Gis paper provides a convincing demonstration of hair-cell renewal in early postnatal rat organ of Corti explants following aminoglycoside damage to the auditory hair cells. The results suggest that the EGF receptor plays a role in the hair-cell renewal response by the damaged organ of Corti, as either TGFa or EGF can initiate this hair-cell renewal response in the aminoglycoside-damaged explants. The results suggest that the damaged halr-cell population is renewed via transdlfferentiation of either supporting cells or latent hair-cell precursors and/or repair of damaged hair cells, as none of the renewed hair-cell population labeled for thymidine incorporation.

regeneration/repair

44. .

Lenoir M, Vago P: Morphological indications of hair cell neodifferentiation in the organ of Corti of amikacin treated pups. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 1996, 319:269-276. Lenoir M, Vago P: Does the organ of Corti attempt to differentiate new hair cells after antibiotic intoxication pups? Int I Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:487-495.

in rat

ear Staecker

and Van De Water

407

This study characterizes a transient attempt at hair-cell renewal in situ at the level of the outer hair cells in the aminoglycoside-damaged cochleae of young rats. Atypical cells that have similarities in surface morphology to developing hair cells appear and then disappear at the junction between damaged and undamaged hair cells within the organ of Cotii. These results may represent an unsuccessful attempt at repair or unsuccessful hair-cell neodifferentiation, as suggested by the authors. Their observation is important because it is the first evidence of an attempt at hair-cell renewal in situ in the mammalian cochlea. 45. .

Zheng JL, Gao WQ: Analysis of rat vestibular hair cell development and regeneration using calretinin as an early marker. J Neurosci 1997, 17:8270-8282. This study confirms calretinin’s usefulness as an early marker of hair-cell differentiation and Its appiication to mammalian vestibular hair-cell regeneration research. The authors used antibodles raised against calretinin to track damaged vestibular hair cells that were no longer identifiable by their characterestic morphology following ototoxic damage, and the consequent loss of their identlfylng sensory hair bundles. This type of approach may prove to be useful for sorting out the relative contnbutions of transdifferentiation and repair to the hair-cell renewal process. 46.

Zheng JL, Lewis A, Gao WQ: Establishment of conditionally immortalized rat utricular epithelial cell lines using a retrovirus mediated gene transfer technique. Hear Res 1998, 117:13-23.

47.

Holey MC, Nishida Y, Grix N: Conditional immortalization of hair cells from the inner ear. Int J Dev Neurosci 1997, 15:541-552.

48.

Lee KH, Cotanche DA: Potential role of bFGF and retinoic acid in the regeneration of chicken cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 1996, 94:1-13.

49.

Pickles JO, van Heumen WR: The expression of messenger RNAs coding for growth factors, their receptors, and eph-class receptor tyrosine kinases in normal and ototoxically damaged chick cochlea. Int J Dev Neurosci 1997, 19:476-487.

50.

Gong TW, Hegeman AD, Shin JJ, Adler HJ, Raphael Y, Lomax Ml: Identification of genes expressed after noise exposure in the chick basilar papilla. Hear Res 1996, 96:20-32.

51.

Saffer L, Gu R, Corwin JT: An RT-PCR analysis of mRNA for growth factor receptors in damaged and control sensory epithelia of rat utricles. Hear Res 1996, 94:14-23.

52.

Malgrange B, Rogister B, Lefebvre P?, Mazg-Servais C, Welcher AA, Bonnet C, Hsu R-Y, Rigo J-M, Van De Water TR, Moonen G: Expression of growth factors and their receptors in the postnatal rat cochlea. Neurochem Res 1998, 23:l 135-I 140.

42.

43.

in the inner

rat