Journal of Molecular Structure, 142 (1986) 105-110 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
FAR INFRARED SPECTRA OF METHYL NITRATE AND METHYL-d3
B. J. van der Vekenl, G. A. Goirgis*,
105
NITRATE
and J. R. Durig*
'Laboratorium voor Anorganische Scheikunde, Rijksuniversitair Antwerpen, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B 2020 Antwerpen (Belgium) *Department (USA)
of Chemistry,
University
of South Carolina,
Centrum
Columbia,
SC 29208
ABSTRACT The far infrared spectra from 300 to 50 cm-l of methyl nitrate, CHsONO,, and methyl-d, nitrate, CD,ONO,, have been recorded at a resolution of 0.12 cm-l. The fundamental methyl torsional mode has been observed at 204.5 cm-l (154.2 cm-l for CD,ONO,) with two excited states falling to lower frequencies which gives a V, barrier of 980 + 40 cm-l (2.80 f 0.11 kcal/mol). The NO, torsion (methoxy) has been observed with the 1 + 0 transition being at 133.7 cm-l (119.5 cm-l for CO,ONO,) and eight successive excited states falling to lower frequencies. From these data the twofold barrier to internal rotation has been calculated to be 2650 + 75 cm-l (7.69 + 0.21 kcal/mol).
INTRODUCTION A rather
complete
Cawthon
(ref.1)
sions.
However,
rotating
based
as well
as
From
later
a
(methoxy) ments of
able
to
cm-l
Raman
CH,
determine
study
states (9100
the
torsional
+
study nor
116 of NO, the
a resolution
values
(ref.2),
a
that
and
excited
matrix
cal/mol). barrier
state
excited There
has
been
infrared
spectra
of
cm-'.
0.12
which
These
for
internal
been
material directly
The
and
NO,
(ref.2)
using
torsion
were
also
of the methyl these
a barrier
observed
of 812 + 41
recent
but apparently Therefore
and CD,ONO,
vibraneither we
have
from 300 to 50
of this study
0 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
entropy
intensity measure-
rotation
observed.
results
is freely
band contours.
the
a relatively
(ref.3)
of CH,ONO,
the two tor-
gives a twofold barrier
authors
herein.
0022-2860/66/$03.50
infrared
they obtained
also
except
and experimental
the
splittings
state
isolated have
to
by Brand and
the NO, group
frequency
of the NO, torsion
threefold
torsions far
assigned
proposed
of the statistical
f 2600
cal/mol). the
being
was published
to be 130 + 20 cm- l from relative
from the second
investigated at
cm-l
modes
depolarization
microwave
of CHsONO,
(ref.1)
on the comparison
f 909
(2321
tional
authors
was estimated
splittings
study
all the normal
these
the
from
group
cm-l
with
of the excited
3182
the
vibrational
are reported
106 EXPERIMENTAL The sample nitric
of CHsONO,
acid
deuterated
in
the
species
(0.12
cm-')
material.
vacuum
far
prepared of
was prepared
used as the starting low temperature
was
presence
similarly
except
spectra
column.
of the
helium
polyethylene
cooled
Ge
windows.
bolometer
Both 6.25
and the sample was contained
CDsOH
equipped
containing
and 12.5p
in a lmeter
of methanol
acid
by sublimation
Mylar
The was on a
high resolution
recorded
from 300 to 50
with a vacuum
a wedged
with
(ref.4).
(98% deuteration)
The relatively
gases were
cm-l on a Nicolet model 8000 interferometer liquid
sulfuric
Both samples were purified
fractionation
infrared
by the esterification
concentrated
sapphire
beamsplitters
bench and a filter
were
and
employed
cell.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION infrared
spectrum
of gaseous
Fig. 1B and the corresponding
The
observed
spectrum
of methyl-d,
the "light"
far
molecule
the 1 + 0 transition
200
WAVENUMBER
Fig. 1. methyl-d,
Far infrared nitrate.
spectra
of
(A)
nitrate
nitrate
for the methyl
is shown
in Fig.
1C.
group is observed
in For at
100
125
150
175
methyl
(cm-‘)
water,
(B)
methyl
nitrate,
and
(C)
107
204.5
cm-l with
have
been
two well
assigned
corresponding strongest
the
Irrespective
beginning
of which
energy
(V,/2)(1
- cos
constant,
F =
internal threefold
first
set
other
First,
0.02 kcal/mol)
was the
the
calculated. calculation
and
an
F value
with
deuteration. is consistent
molecule.
Utilizing
oscillation
reduced moment
as:
moment of
carried
out
the
V(d)
=
of inertia
inertia
The calculations was
for the
were using
done
the in
only the
but the transitions
was carried
were fit
out using the first three
fit.
Similar
of 2.9528
respectively.
as the
was
of
two transitions
this
cm-l gave
carried
out
*60 cm-l, and positive
molecule.
transitions
since
it
the
to be
than
the
the
CD,ONO, (2.83 f
as the 1 + 0 and 2
the 3 + 2 transition
was
at
transitions
at
only 134.38
cm-l
calculations
and
gave a The
fit to &5 cm-'. and when
to 968 f 40.cm-l
Further
160.11
which
it is
but the last
using a Vs term
the fit but the value was rather large,
is inconsistent
Therefore,
for
respectively,
were
is lowered
we
is due to greater
is heavier
have frequencies believe
which
improved
The
in Table 1 is from this calculation. using
are only fit to *3 cm-l.
latter transitions
light
appears
the barrier
1.
bands was
a V, of 989 f 7 cm-l
From this calculation
pair
in Table
was off by 3 cm-l although
calculations
1 +- 0 and 2 + 1 transitions,
transition
with these
is shown
and the fit using all four observed
using the 154.22 and 147.98 cm-l transitions
to the calculation
kcal/mol),
is a set
194.11cm-l and only a V, term which gave
calculation
better
added
We
and
reduced
since the third transition
were
third
rotor
6a)
is the
There
a value which
torsional
of 989 + 60 cm-l but the transitions
the
factor
the fit of the transitions
calculation
cm-l
torsional
molecule.
shift
obtains
at 139.3 cm-l and the fit given
further
for
- cos Ir
at 204.49
better
+ 1 transitions,
barrier
one
a threefold
was predicted
three
using
predicted
since the
with both V, and Vs terms which gave values of V, = 1018 f. 19 cm-l
transition
142.86
for
The second
not significantly
A
appropriate
is used,
(V,/2)(1
and Vs = -24 f 9 cm-l;
molecule
The
respectively. assigned
the next one at 148.0 cm-l which
of 970 f 19 cm-l (2.77 + 0.05 kcal/mol)
transitions
the
in the "light"
cm-l with
the
to rotation
ways.
to only 2 cm-l.
fourth
2 transitions,
from the data for the CH,ONO,
+
two transitions
a barrier
3 +
194.1 and 178.1 cm-l which
and F has a value of 5.546 cm-l for the light molecule,
barrier
different
torsion
h2/8n21r,where
rotation
states at
at 160.1 and 142.9 cm-l have too large a separa-
and
function 3o)
1 and
at 154.2
spacing
the value obtained
potential
two
2 +
to the methyl
correct
excited
for the CD, group are not readily
set of transitions
of transitions
with
the
transitions
tion compared
has
as
defined
CH,
with the value for this parameter
believe
the
coupling rotor
complexity
of this
of
rotor with
and the torsional
the
CD,
the NO,
transitions
closer to those for the NO, top. the
which
methyl is the
barrier average
has a value between
those
of 980 f 40 cm-l obtained
(2.80 + 0.11
for the CH, and CD,
108 TABLE 1 Far infrared rotations
torsional
of methyl
transitions
due to the CH, or CD, and NO, internal
nitrate.
CH,ONO, rel. u(cm-l)
int.a
204.49 196.20 194.11 192.22 188.61 178.08 160.00 139.21 136.82 136.52 134.99 134.58 133.74 129.64 125.96 124.61 124.28 122.39 118.92 115.48 112.43 109.59 109.21
b
I+0
S
CD,ONO, v(cm-l)
Ad
assignment
0.71
&,w VW
-1.90 -2.71
3+2 4+3
W
VW
assignment
171.64 166.32 160.11 154.22 151.31 147.98 142.86
-0.34
VW 2+1
rel. inta
1 +
Ad
07
I+0 b
-0.92
2+1 2 f l?
0.25
3~2
0.66
m VW VW W
C
S
I+0
S
2+1 3+2
0.93 0.06 -0.33
4+3 5+4 6+5 7~6 8~7
-0.53 -0.56 -0.47 0.10 0.98
S
VW W S S
m W
VW VW
sh VW
142.74 140.31 137.73 137.41 135.61 134.38 131.78 129.00 124.93 122.68 119.91 115.84 113.84 111.75 110.82 109.42 107.63 104.38 103.12 97.62
W
W W W
m VW VW VW
3 + 2?
W
m m
1+-o
C
0.97
2+1
0.18
3~2
-0.53
4+3 5+4 6~5 7~6
-1.18 -1.04 1.62 -0.02
W
m VW W
m W W VW
aAbbreviations used: s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; v, very; sh, shoulder; bbr, broad. The transitions for the CH,(CD,) torsional transitions are from nearly triply degenerate (A,E) energy levels but are indicated by single digits. 'The energy levels for the Nfz rotor are essentially doubly degenerate (AlrAz) dbut they are indicated by single digits. The A stands for the observed minus the calculated values.
rotors
using the first
obtained
for the
considerably
expected
utilizing
study
study
(ref.2),
(ref.2)
difference
the
where
than the value
rotor and the second ever,
transitions,
light molecule
higher
from the microwave largest
three
estimated
we calculated
than the value we obtained
a V6 term was
structural
was estimated
an F number
the splittings parameters of 5.784
with the determined
This value is
(2.32 kcal/mol)
the Io in the ground
state where
spans the value
utilized.
of 812 f 41 cm-l
where the uncertainty
between
excited
and the uncertainty
from the
state of the methyl were
listed
observed.
How-
in the microwave
cm-' which
structural
obtained
is 4.3%
parameters
larger
(ref.5).
Considering the
two
both
possible
values
are
coupling
between
barriers
would
assignment
and
whereas
one
would
1.3796
cm-l
which
is
begin
3.5 at
series
for CHsONO,
were
in
which
carried
believe
two
out
difficult, closely
lowest
by energy
good agreement a frequency
gives
for
levels
reasonable
CDsONO,
the
with
fit to the transitions
barrier fore, more
although the
by adding
CH,
molecule believe
calculated
reflect
the
so we
values
the actual
and
NO,
from
gave
methyl
barrier
sponding
barrier
nitrate
and nitrite
of
the
cm-l
light
these
molecule.
values
with
an
should
be the
least per-
This value is in remarkably study (ref.2). where if one corrects
the
may
is about 2.4 cm-l larger than it
is possible
obtain
large V, term.
is shown
in Table
give
an
is reasonable two
1.
a
For
Similar
effect
the
(Table
spacings
1).
so
There-
is expected
Possible
low
to
coupling
a calculation
be very instructive.
is quite
in cis-methyl
artificially
transitions
for the NO, rotor.
the C-O bond distance
to
V, = 1957 ? 21 cm-l and V, =
results
first
of 980 f 40 cm-l 669
of
a V, term 400 cm-l lower and a V,
these
barrier
rotors
Similar
an F number
the
a relatively
are:
carried out with such coupling would probably The
well
barrier,
the fit of the transitions
barrier
nearly
between
for
between
transitions
this
the fit of the transitions
larger
as the
data (ref.5).
f 8 cm-l where
cm-l
cm-l.
with
from the microwave
201
for the CD,ONO,
to obtain
of 2690 f 27 cm-l
to k1.2
molecule
normal modes.
the determined
100
fit
value
light molecule
calculations
from
for the light
In order
barrier
are
in the potential
from other
rotor
barrier
particularly
well.
is somewhere
of the observed
NO,
CH,ONO,,
and only a V, term with an F number
the
term
twofold
of 130 + 20 cm-l was used for the NO, torsion,
the
for
i.e., 2650 + 75 cm-l (7.69 f 0.21 kcal/mol),
with the value obtained
for
rather
is 2609 + 33 cm-l (7.46 f 0.09 kcal/mol) with
F number by using the new structural
expected
is
the 2 + 1 at 129.64
frequency
the
a periodic
the
barrier
frequencies
Since the spacing
that the
spaced rather than diverging
transitions
agreement
the
transition
in
of
periodic
barrier
to span these values,
the
is
values would differ
cm-l,
lower
Calculation
twofold
the
reasonable
we
uncertainty
there
119.91cm-l with the first few "hot bands"
become
a normal
torsional
at 133.74
cm- 1
is rather
the transitions
and the twofold
Therefore,
turbed
about
these
kcal/mol);
calculations
that
but it would be surprising
(methoxy)
0 falling
in frequency.
cm-'
f 0.07
since
ones
for
lead to a 10% error,
is possible
that the barrier
we used the first two transitions
1.6752
(7.69
NO,
1 +
lower
found
barrier, of
of
since
be
the
for CO,ONO,
cm-l
compound
to the extent
could
It
by these two techniques.
the
successive
4
either
of
with
those
about
of error which
in agreement.
the CH, and NO, torsions
straightforward cm-l
not
be effected
by the amounts determined The
sources
still
high compared
nitrite
(ref.6).
to the correFor oboth the
has been found to be 1.437 A and the
110 N-O(CH,) 1.398
bond distances
i,
the CH,ON moieties the PCON
which
nitrite.
Thus,
barriers
other
with
it is difficult nitrate
to rationalize
to compare
barriers
in other
even
barrier
larger.
for
the same except for
nitrate.
However,
the PO'NO
angle in cis-methyl
the differences
nitrite
the methyl CH,OX
in the methyl
on the basis
barrier
molecules.
in the nitrate.
For
example,
the
of structural
in the nitrate
The methyl
with
barrier
in
There are other CH,-0 barriers
barrier
is 1070 + 52 cm-l (ref.8) and the methyl
is 1339 f 70 cm-l (refs.9,lO)
Finally,
it
should
which
hot bands originating in an excited it difficult of
be
intermingled
torsions
therefore
which clearly
in
barrier
indicates
methyl
hypochlorite,
in methyl
vinyl ether
that the "X" group has a
effect on the methyl barriers of the CH,OX molecules.
transitions
some
the
parameters
ether has been found (ref.7) to be 942.6 ? 8.7 cm-l which agrees well
pronounced
nitro
are essentially
for
and cis-methyl
interesting
methyl
are
CH,OCl,
smaller
structural
is 3.3“ larger than the corresponding
the corresponding
which
degrees
with values of 1.402 i and
the
between the two molecules.
It is also
dimethyl
different
Therefore,
for these two compounds
in methyl
variations
(refs.5,6).
is two
(cis) in the nitrate -
some
are only slightly
respectively
mentioned
that
with the assigned
have not been assigned. from excited
to ascribe bands
be
a
large
explained
number
by
of weak
for both the methyl and
Some of these bands are probably bending
They appear as "clumps"
them to a particular
could
are
states of the low frequency
state of the other torsion.
these
there
transitions
normal mode. coupling
mode or
which makes
It is possible
of the
two
that
rotors
and
further studies along these lines are needed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors the
NATO
gram,
gratefully
Scientific
Grant
NO.
acknowledge
Affairs
569-82,
Division
and
by
the
the financial through
support
of this
the collaborative
National
Science
study
research
Foundation
by
by
proGrant
CHE-83-11279.
REFERENCES 1 2 3
J. W. J. S. J.
C. Cl. Brand and T. M. Cawthon, J. Am. Chem. Sot., 77 (1955) 319-323. B. Dixon and E. B. Wilson, Jr., J. Chem. Phys., 35 (1961) 191-198. A. Lannon. L. E. Harris. F. 0. Verderame, W. G. Thomas, E. A. Lucia and Koniers, J: Mol. Struct.,-50 (1974) 68-81. 4 R. Johnson (Ed.), Organic Synthesis, Vol. XIX, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1939, p. 64. 5 A. P. Cox and S. Waring, Trans. Faraday Sot., 67 (1971) 3441-3450. 6 W. D. Gwinn, R. J. Anderson and 0. Stelman, Bull. Am. Phys. Sot., 13 (1968) 831. 7 P. Groner and J. R. Durig, J. Chem. Phys., 66 (1977) 1856-1874. 8 J. 5. Rigden and S. S. Butcher, J. Chem. Phys., 40 (1964) 2109-2114. 9 P. Cahill, L. P. Gold and N. Owen, J. Chem. Phys., 48 (1968) 1620-1626. 10 J. R. Ourig and 0. A. C. Compton, J. Chem. Phys., 69 (1978) 2028-2035.