Fast contributions to the magnetic permeability aftereffect in amorphous ferromagnetic ribbons

Fast contributions to the magnetic permeability aftereffect in amorphous ferromagnetic ribbons

Jmumal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 54-57 (1986) 273-274 ‘73 FAST CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MAGNETIC AMORPHOUS FERROMAGNETIC RIBBONS P. ALLIA, C...

197KB Sizes 0 Downloads 17 Views

Jmumal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

54-57

(1986) 273-274

‘73

FAST CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MAGNETIC AMORPHOUS FERROMAGNETIC RIBBONS P. ALLIA, C. BEATRICE Istrtuto Elettrotrc~nrc~o Nuziotdr

*, P. MAZZETTI “Gulrko

Ferrur,.~‘:

PERMEABILITY

AFTEREFFECT

IN

* and F. VINAI

Gruppo

Nu;roncrle

Strutturu

de//r

Mutericr

del C‘NR. I IO/75

Tor~w

/to/,

The aftereffect of the initial magnetic permeahility of amorphous ferromagnetic alloys i\ studied h> using a new impulsive method. specifically developed for the analysis of fast relaxation times (down to 10~ ’ s after an instantaneous change of sample’s magnetization state). A strong decay of p,. whose kinetics contrasts with the usual long-time behavior. has been detected in the explored short-time region.

Magnetic aftereffect phenomena occurring in amorphous ferromagnetic alloys are of considerable interest in theory and applications of this class of materials. Increasing efforts have been made in order to clarify the nature of the aftereffect of the initial magnetic permeability (disaccomodation), a property extremely sensitive to the degree of disorder of the amorphous structure [1.2]. In amorphous ferromagnets, the reversible decay of the permeability observed after a rearrangement of magnetic domains. is generally characterized by a superposition of relaxation times 7 distributed at each temperature over an extended time interval. Usually. the existence of such a distribution is ascribed to the presence of a spectrum of activation energies Q for the ordering processes responsible for the aftereffect, the relation between each 7 and the corresponding Q being given. in the simplest model. by an Arrhenius law [3]. In various approaches, the aftereffect is assumed to originate from directional ordering processes involving structural defects (atoms or more probably small atomic clusters) which can reversibly reorient in dependence of changes of the local magnetization vector. and have been pictured as classical two-level systems [2,3]. Although the nature of the interaction between defects and magnetization is still rather controversial [4.5], their directional ordering in generally assumed to be characterized by an extended range of activation energies. which consequently provides a natural explanation for the observed distribution of relaxation times. However. the actual location of the boundaries of such a distribution is unknown. even at room temperature. A relevant fraction of short-time effects are in fact lost in the aftereffect measurements which are currently performed, involving either a conventional demagnetization of samples. which comports a loss of information on relaxation times shorter than 7, = 1 s [5]. or just a redistribution of walls in new equilibrium positions. as formerly proposed by Allis et al. [6] (in this case 7, is of

order IO-~’ s). Our present aim is to add new information about the considered relaxation process, by substantially lowering this value of 7,. Actually, 7, cannot be reduced below an intrinsic limiting value, corresponding to the time T,, involved in the development and stabilization of a new domain structure after an instantaneous ( < 10mx s) magnetization change. This time was found to be of the order 10 -’ 5 in the present case. The present technique precisely allows times as short as 10~ ’ s to be explored after a change of the domain structure. consequently increasing by at least three orders of magnitude the range of relaxation times which can be studied in a single measurement. Possible spurious contributions to the signal have been carefully checked and suppressed in order to extract reliable and reproducible data. The method consists in replacing the conventional demagnetization procedure by a fast saturation of the sample. induced by a periodic pulsed field. A train of rectangular H pulses of suitable frequency. alternatively opposite in sign. is applied to the sample. The (variable) pulse width is = IO-’ s. the pulse amplitude being always sufficient to saturate the material. After each pulse, a new domain structure develops in a time f,, = IO-’ s. The changes in permeability occurring in the interval (0. I,,) are automatlcally suppressed by insertion of a suitable window allowing only times t 2 I,, to be explored. As a consequence. the analyzed signal is not affected by spurious contributions arising from transient effect. During each measurement. the walls are driven by a radiofrequency sinusoidal field. having an amplitude which can be varied from zero to values of the order ti. allowing for the study of the disaccom-

the

odation The

as a function induced

properly

amplified.

radiofrequency proportional

accommodation *

Physics Department.

0304-8853/85/$03.30

Politecnico of Torino,

Itall.

0 Elsevier Science Publishers

of the applied

signal,

detected

rectified

oscillation. to

the

relaxing

and The

field by

[7].

a pickup

filtered output permeability.

coil.

to suppress signal

is the

is then Each

dis-

measurement actually consists in an average over several independent. consecutive decays of the permeability. In this way. it is possible to signifi-

B.V.

cantly ent

reduce the statistical

decays.

arising

the process

of domain

may then be analyzed in the latter

a train

independent

simply

proportional.

modulus

submitted order

permeability

plot is

to

reported

a small

composed walls. here

of

The

advantage

is emphasised

lower

limits

Lation at very

involving that

short

aftereffect

is

(1.3

kg/mm’)

structure.

using regions

which

domain

after

observed.

decay of the permeability

I,,.

On

sample

from

the in

change (b).

a

an “initial”

thL1s shown time

tail

tail

by

h>

with

observed rihhons

it

is

contrihutlons

[I ] 121 [3] (41

1

:0-*

0-1

lC3

10lt(5, lo2

[S] [6]

Fag. I. Behavwr with time of the room temperature initial permeability p,(r)/p,(t,,) for the Fc~,,CO,~B,~S~~ alloy: lli = I

x10 5s.

the short-

measurements

to the

[7]

This

are

different not

indicate is

the

methods.

procease\ similar

long-time state,

and

tall.

or

different strlt

the

Iempcraturc.

of

to Jccide

I ).

that

substanttatlv

again

reproduced

permeability

to a completely

not

is

c<>mposition.

possible the

to ordering

explain

decay.

conventional

results

ha\ing

the amorphou\

$3

function.

with such a LICW (see fig.

phenomenolog\

50 far with

the

distrlhution

treatments.

the

dc-

uith

constant\.

short-time

similar

moment.

to

k-4

agrermcnt 01‘ time

preliminary

contrast

the I~>ng-

a spectrum

contrasts

annealing

10 arc

to the inttial

while

by ;I change of the measurement

or

’ 10 ’

be approximatelv

law. in

a logarithmic of

respect

addition.

may

IO

50 Car. which

of

strong

value (actu-

In

at

comple-

corresponding

investigated weak uith

the ones

measured After

modified

closeI>

dramatic

than

intensrty

acrihed

:c -5

precisely

the aftereffect

this

generally

time of the order

;I

to be rather

by ;I suitable

Moreover.

higher

are

appears.

LI’~LI;~~ assumption weighted

much

demagnetization.

phenomena

of

scribed

rrtatsd

4i

after

01‘ the fast decay in

constant a

fast.

times

time decay clearly

demagneti-

the contrary. in

in

described

indicating

does not stay

resulting

was

180”

are explored

pattern

the permeability times

method

lines.

conventional

by

long

deca? of the permeability.

sub&mtiall>

separated

the

by the dotted

(a) and impulsive

Notice

stress

which

the aftereffect

r,) in as-cast sample

tion

t = t,,).

is

initial

1. The

domains

of

after

rather

at

reported.

5. 11long-time

decay.

temperature

the value

currently

of

to the squared

fig.

domain

of the time

experiments

in

by

which

of a single

of time

tensile

antiparallel

signal

spectrum

decays.

of the room

to get a simple

of

in time or in frequency.

p, as a function

Fe,,C‘o,,B,,Si,.

The

case. the frequency

in these conditions,

A representative

nature

formation.

transform

ally.

between differ-

the random

structure

of the Fourier

permeability

from

either

evaluating, of

fluctuations

mostly

in

strong

aftereffects Notice

that

in

amorphou\

At

the prezcnt

\*hrther

aftereffect

the may

I’a\t hc

to the ones in\c,hetl if

thq

have

mechanl\rn.

to

bc

typical

01

to he .specified.

P. Ailia. l:.k. Lutx~rsk~. R. Sat0 ~urtclh. (;.I’. Soar&l .rnd F. Vinai, IEbt Tram. Magn. MAGI7 (19X1) 2615 P. Allia and F. Vmai. Phya. Kc\. BZh (10x1) 6141. 11. KronmCiller. Phll. Mag. B4X (19X3) 127. I’. All13 and F. Vlnai. Proc. RQ.5 C‘onfurrnce. S. Stwh ,~nd Il. Warllmonr. ai\. (North-Holl;ind. Rm\tcrd;im. IYXi I p. II’). H Kronmuller. N. Moser and F. Kerttmmelcr. II-.I-,I, Train\. Magn. MAC;-20 ( 1‘9x4) 13Xx. I’. Allis. P. Ma/ettl and t:. VI~II. .I Magn. Magn. Mar. I4 (IYXO) 2x1. I’. 4lh;1 and I’. V1nai. IEEE -rrnn\. Magn. LlACi-I7 (19x1 ) 14x1.