First Person

First Person

44 Silbert, Matta, and Ely 2. Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the plusoptiX vision screener for the detection of amblyopia risk fac...

50KB Sizes 1 Downloads 56 Views

44

Silbert, Matta, and Ely

2. Matta NS, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Performance of the plusoptiX vision screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children. J AAPOS 2008;12:490-92. 3. Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, et al., Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:637-50. 4. Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB, AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detect-

Volume 18 Number 1 / February 2014 ing and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. J AAPOS 2003;7: 314-16. 5. Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D, Ruben JB; AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS 2013;17:4-8. 6. Simons K. Amblyopia characterization, treatment, and prophylaxis. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50:123-66.

First Person

Our one orthoptists was feeling festive for the holidays and was wearing antlers. She was refracting a child with amblyopia whose vision wasn’t quite as good as it had been. He was brought in to see the pediatric ophthalmologist, and when he came in the child looked at the doctor and said, “I have to tell you something.” The doctor asked, “What?” The child stated in a huff, “You know the woman with the antlers? Well they kept getting in the way and made it hard to read the letters.” Contributed by Noelle S. Matta CO, CRC, COT, Lancaster, Pennsylvania

Journal of AAPOS