First-principles study of nitrobenzene adsorption on graphene

First-principles study of nitrobenzene adsorption on graphene

Applied Surface Science 305 (2014) 382–385 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Surface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/loca...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 51 Views

Applied Surface Science 305 (2014) 382–385

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Surface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc

First-principles study of nitrobenzene adsorption on graphene Zhenhong Dai a,∗ , Yinchang Zhao b a b

Computational Physics Laboratory, Institute of Opto-electronic Information Science and Technology, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, PR China Department of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 15 February 2014 Received in revised form 13 March 2014 Accepted 14 March 2014 Available online 25 March 2014 Keywords: Nanostructures Ab initio calculations Electronic structure Surface properties

a b s t r a c t Based on first-principles calculations, the properties of nitrobenzene adsorption on graphene have been investigated. The results show that nitrobenzene prefers to be parallel to the plane of graphene with nitro closer to graphene than phenyl. Due to molecular adsorption, there is a doping band near Fermi energy. The adsorbed molecules will become perpendicular to the plane of graphene under a electrostatic field, and the doping band varies conspicuously with respect to Fermi energy. In addition, a 5000 steps MD is performed at T = 300 K to test the stability of nitrobenzene molecules adsorbed erectly on graphene under electric field. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction From the discovery of graphene[1,2] to now, tremendous scientific interests have been aroused for unusual electrical and mechanical properties of this two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice of carbon atoms[3]. Many extraordinary properties, such as zero gap semiconducting electronic structure, massless Dirac quasiparticles, and anomalous quantum Hall effects[3,4], have been well known for several years. In practice, graphene can be cut into nanoribbons for practical applications, and further be modified on the brim by adatoms or molecules for the study and elucidation of its properties. Adsorbates on graphene have been used as dopants that vary the number of charge carriers[5–7], as a method of band-gap opening, and as a way to alter the electronic structure of graphene[8,9]. Both experimentally and theoretically, molecule dopings and the related chemical sensor properties of graphene have also been researched[10,11]. At the same time, some graphene oxides have been fabricated by many chemical methods[12]. In these new structures, a graphene sheet can contain functional groups on its network such as hydroxyl, epoxide, carboxylic and carbonyl groups, and these oxygen groups on 2D network can enhance its hydrophilic properties. Hahn et al have prepared some gold nanoparticles(AuNPs) and fabricated graphene oxide(GO) sheets decorated with AuNPs to further study their sizedependent electrical and catalytic properties, they find that the

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 5356901947; fax: +86 5356901947. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (Z. Dai). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.096 0169-4332/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

improved o-nitroaniline adsorption and electron transfer at the Au/GO interface leads to better catalytic activity[13]. In this paper, it is confirmed that graphene can be taken as a chemical sensor of nitrobenzene molecules. In addition to taking these phenomena into account, the formation of regular arrays of adsorbates, Kondo physics, the existence of local moments, and atomic collapse etc. have also explored by theoretical works[14,15]. Under an electrostatic field (EF), we also researched the formation of regular arrays of adsorbates and variation of electronic structure. It is concluded that not only the adsorbates tend to be regular arrays but also transport properties of the system change sharply upon variation of EF.

2. Theoretical model and calculation method All calculations have been performed by VASP[16] code, which is based on first-principles density functional theory (DFT)[17,18]. The ultrasoft pseudopotentials (US-PP)[19] are adopted to describe the electron-ion interaction. Local density approximation (LDA) is used to express the exchange-correlation energy of interacting electrons. The non-spin-polarized performance is adopted because each elemental constituent for nitrobenzene adsorbate has closed valence shells. The supercell geometry with a vacuum layer larger than 18 A˚ is utilized. The cutoff energy was set to be 500 eV for plane wave basis, and the relaxation stopped until force acting on ˚ Molecules are placed on one side all atoms is less than 0.03 eV/A. of the graphene surface for all geometries. Two kinds of supercell (3 × 3) and (5 × 5) graphene unit cells are used. The Brillouin zone was sampled by -centered k-point mesh of (12 × 12 × 1)

Z. Dai, Y. Zhao / Applied Surface Science 305 (2014) 382–385

Fig. 1. Nitrobenzene erectly (a) and (c) or horizontally (b) and (d) adsorbed on (3 × 3) graphene (a) and (b) or (5 × 5) graphene (c) (d). H* atom is the farthest atom of nitrobenzene molecule from graphene plane, and O atom is the closest atom of nitrobenzene molecule to graphene.

and (6 × 6 × 1) for (3 × 3) and (5 × 5) supercell, respectively. The Gaussian smearing with a width of 0.1 eV is utilized for the occupied electronic levels, and the EF is modeled by dipole correction in normal direction with 0.3 eV/A˚ and 0.6 eV/A˚ electric field force, respectively. 3. Results and discussion First of all, four adsorption configurations are considered, where one nitrobenzene molecule is adsorbed vertically (perpendicular cases) or horizontally (parallel cases) on (3 × 3) and (5 × 5) graphene supercells, as shown in Fig. 1. After full relaxation, adsorbed molecules prefer to locate at atop sites of graphene with respective adsorption energies of 0.574 and 0.434 eV for (3 × 3) and (5 × 5) supercells [see Fig. 1(b) and (d)]. Here, the adsorption energy is calculated by the following expression Ea = Eg + Em − Es ,

(1)

where Eg , Em , and Es are energies of pristine graphene, isolated nitrobenzene molecule, and adsorption system, respectively. If nitrobenzene molecule is placed on graphene erectly metastable state of systems can be obtained [see Fig. 1(a) and (c)]. Because of stronger interactions between nitro group and graphene, for all perpendicular cases, only the configurations in which phenyl ring is far away from graphene are taken into account.

383

In parallel cases, due to polar molecules arranging orderly within a plane, the main interaction between adsorbates is attractive Coulomb force, which leads to decrease of adsorption energy when coverage of adsorbed molecule is lowered. Similarly, in perpendicular cases, the interaction between adsorbates is mainly repulsive Coulomb force, explaining the increase of adsorption energy as increasing of nitrobenzene coverage [see Table 1]. For (3 × 3) supercells there is a lattice expansion in parallel case contrasting to a lattice shrink in perpendicular one. We believe that in parallel case the lattice expansion is mainly caused by strong van der waals interaction between adsorbate and graphene matrix. In all parallel cases there is a tilting angle between molecule plane and graphene surface because the nitro-graphene interaction is stronger than that of phenyl-graphene. In addition, the minimum nitrobenzenegraphene distance is smaller than 3.0 A˚ for all configurations. To study the electronic structures of this kind of adsorption systems. Firstly, the relative dipole moment of single nitrobenzene molecule is calculated. Due to different electronegativity between phenyl and nitro, there is charge transference after the two functional groups combined to be one molecule. Based on analysis of the difference charge density, the quantity of transferred electrons from phenyl to nitro and dipole moment are calculated to be 0.188 e and 3.14 Debye, respectively [see Fig. 2(a)]. Then, the adsorption system of (3 × 3) supercell is taken as an example for the composite structure. In parallel case there is almost no charge transference between graphene and adsorbing molecules. However, in perpendicular case 0.033 electrons are transferred from graphene to adsorbate, as shown in Fig. 2(b). This is the reason why graphene lattice shrinks in perpendicular case [see Table 1]. Correspondingly, the change of systemic dipole moment induced by electron transfer is calculated to be only −0.10 Debye, having almost no effects on molecule polarity. Energy band and partial density of states (PDOS) for the (3 × 3) supercells are shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b). Near Fermi energy there is a doping band caused by the adsorption of nitrobenzene especially due to nitro group. Owing to strong physical adsorption, the doping state becomes more conspicuous in parallel case. In perpendicular case, due to 0.033 electrons transference from substrate to adsorbate, Fermi level and doping state lowers. In parallel case, because of no charge transfer between adsorbate and graphene, Fermi level remains unchanged, and the doping state is unoccupied. Finally, adsorption features under the electrostatic field (EF) are researched. Along z-direction noted in Fig. 1(a), EF of 0.3 and 0.6 eV/A˚ is added, respectively. After relaxation, in perpendicular cases adsorption energy and lattice scale increase sharply with increasing of EF [see Table 1]. It is obvious that the interaction between molecular dipole moment and EF improves adsorption

Fig. 2. Charge density and difference charge linear density (along z-direction) of single nitrobenzene molecule (a) and nitrobenzene molecule perpendicularly adsorbed on (3 × 3) graphene (b). Cutoff distance Rcut is marked in picture. Electron accumulated region is denoted by ‘e-increase’.

384

Z. Dai, Y. Zhao / Applied Surface Science 305 (2014) 382–385

Table 1 Adsorption features for all configurations studied. Ea is adsorption energy of nitrobenzene adsorbed on graphene. S/S is relative lattice scale change of graphene due to molecular adsorption. dg−m is distance between adsorbed molecule and graphene sheet. For each configuration and parameter considered, there are three values, corresponding ˚ respectively. three cases under EF of 0.0, 0.3 and 0.6 eV/A, System

(3 × 3) Perpendicular

(3 × 3) Parallel

(5 × 5) Perpendicular

(5 × 5) Parallel

Ea (eV)

0.108 0.313 0.706

0.574 0.573 0.574

0.165 0.525 1.165

0.434 0.538

S/S

−0.09% −0.04% 0.07%

0.13% 0.13% 0.13%

0.01% 0.03% 0.11%

0.01% 0.01%

Tilting(◦ )

89.0 89.0 89.1

10.3 10.3 10.3

89.7 89.7 89.7

2.7 5.3

˚ dg−m (A)

2.83–8.68 2.83–8.68 2.82–8.67

2.81–3.89 2.81–3.89 2.81–3.89

2.83–8.67 2.82–8.67 2.81–8.67

2.97–3.34 2.86–3.42

energy, resulting in a lattice expansion. Interestingly, in parallel case of (3 × 3) supercell adsorption features are not influenced by EF. This is caused by strong adsorbate–adsorbate attractive Coulomb interactions. In addition, in perpendicular cases tilting angle and distance between molecules and graphene have no conspicuous changes. To illustrate the influence of EF on electronic structure, energy band and PDOS for (3 × 3) supercells are calculated. In Fig. 3(c) and (d), electronic structure for perpendicular case of the (3 × 3) supercells is shown. Contrasted to Fig. 3(a), Fermi level improves conspicuously with the increase of EF, which is caused by certain amount of ground state electrons transmitted to excitation state due to the induction of EF. Meanwhile, doping state is more lowered below Fermi level. Obviously, transport property of system will be changed sharply. More interestingly, for parallel case of the (3 × 3) supercells, not only the energetic and structural parameters are not changed by added EF but also energy band and PDOS remain unchanged. This is also attributed to strong adsorbate–adsorbare

Coulomb attractive interaction. Because of this strong interactions, electrons are all bound in ground state, implying that the added EF cannot change its electronic structure. There are many special properties in perpendicular case of (5 × 5) supercell. After EF of 0.3 eV/A˚ is added, tilting angle between adsorbing molecule and graphene is changed from 2 . 7◦ to 5 . 3◦ with a decrease of minimum nitrobenzene-graphene distance. Meanwhile, adsorption energy improves about 0.1 eV. However, ˚ convergent state of the adsorption system under an EF of 0.6 eV/A, cannot be obtained by ion relaxation. For this particular situation we calculated the variation trend of adsorption energy upon variation of tilting angle from 0◦ to 90◦ [see Fig. 4]. Obviously, adsorption energy increases with the tilting angle. This can be explained by the interaction between molecular dipole moment and EF, which can be expressed as following

Fig. 3. Energy band and PDOS for dense coverage adsorption system. (a) Perpendicular case. (b) Parallel case. (c) and (d) is perpendicular case under EF of 0.3 and ˚ respectively. 0.6 eV/A,

Fig. 4. (a) Diagram for tilting angle between nitrobenzene and graphene plane changing from 0◦ to 90◦ . (b) Variation trend of adsorption energy upon tilting angle ˚ under EF of 0.6 eV/A.

H = EPsin,

(2)

˚ P = 3.14 Debye (0.655 eA), ˚  is tilting angle where E = 0.6 eV/A, of molecular plane. But for the angle from 10◦ to 20◦ the curve of adsorption energy becomes flat, especially, at about 12◦ there is a energy barrier of 0.002 eV [marked with ‘B’ in inset depicted in Fig. 4(b)]. This energy barrier is so small that it cannot prevent nitrobenzene plane to become perpendicular to graphene sheet under the action of EF at finite temperature. In brief, in adsorption systems of (5 × 5) supercell, no matter what the primary arrays of adsorbates are, adding a strong external EF of 0.6 eV/A˚ can make nitrobenzene adsorb erectly on graphene. So, after a strong EF of 0.6 eV/A˚ is added, for the (5 × 5) supercell there is only the perpendicular case exists. For the (3 × 3) supercells, in parallel case the added EF is null and void for all properties of system. If the sequence of adding EF and adsorbing nitrobenzene on

Z. Dai, Y. Zhao / Applied Surface Science 305 (2014) 382–385

385

doping band near Fermi energy of systems, implying that graphene can be taken as one of chemical sensors of nitrobenzene molecules. After EF of 0.6 eV/A˚ is added along normal direction, nitrobenzene tends to be perpendicular to graphene with sharp increase of adsorption energy. Meanwhile, electronic structure of the adsorption system changes conspicuously. It can be concluded that adding a suitable EF to polar molecule-adsorbed graphene not only the arrays of adsobates become regular but also transport properties of the adsorption system can be changed. As a result, one can get expected structures and functions by adding normal electrostatic field to systems considered. Acknowledgments Fig. 5. A 5000 steps MD simulation with and without the influence of strong EF at 300 K. Left panel: without the influence of EF. Right panel: adding EF of ˚ dO−graphene is distance between oxygen atom of nitrobenzene and graphene. 0.6 eV/A. dH ∗ −graphene is distance from graphene to H* atom of nitrobenzene labeled in Fig. 1.

graphene is reversed, obviously, there is only perpendicular cases exists for each kind of supercells. In addition, a 5000 steps MD is employed to test the stability of nitrobenzene erectly adsorbing on a (3 × 3) graphene under EF ˚ Also the same simulation without effect of EF is perof 0.6 eV/A. formed for comparison. The simulation temperature is 300K with the duration of 1.5 fs time step. Graphene is fixed in the process of MD simulation. The results are described in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5, triangular line is distance between oxygen atom of nitrobenzene and graphene, circular line denotes the distance from graphene to H* atom of nitrobenzene labeled in Fig. 1(a). When no EF is added, MD simulation shows that erect nitrobenzene becomes tilting even parallel to the graphene. After a EF of 0.6 eV/A˚ is added, the adsorbed molecules essentially remain perpendicular to gaphene with a little deviation from erect state after MD simulation. This implies that nitrobenzene erectly adsorbed on (3 × 3) graphene under EF of 0.6 eV/A˚ is thermodynamically stable. 4. Conclusion In conclusion, we confirmed that in nitrobenzene-adsorbed system nitrobenzene prefers to be parallel to graphene with no charge transfer between adsorbates and graphene. There is a conspicuous

This research was supported by the New Century Excellent Talents in University in Ministry of Education of China (NCET-09-0867) and Shandong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists (Grant No. 2008JQ2). References [1] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science 306 (2004) 666–669. [2] A.K. Geim, K.S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 183. [3] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I.V. Grigorieva, S.V. Dbonos, A.A. Firsov, Nature (London) 438 (2005) 197. [4] Y. Zhang, Y.W. Tan, H.L. Stormer, P. Kim, Nature (London) 438 (2005) 201. [5] A. Bostwick, T. Ohta, T. Seyller, K. Horn, E. Rotenberg, Nat. Phys. 3 (2007) 36. [6] I. Gierz, C. Riedl, U. Starke, C.R. Ast, K. Kern, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 4603. [7] F. Schedin, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, E.W. Hill, P. Blake, M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 652. [8] H.S. Ahin, M. Topsakal, S. Ciraci, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 115432. [9] J.-A. Yan, L. Xian, M.Y. Chou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 086802. [10] F. Schedin, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, E.W. Hill, P. Blake, M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 652. [11] T.O. Wehling, K.S. Novoselov, S.V. Morozov, E.E. Vdovin, M.I. Katsnelson, A.K. Geim, A.I. Lichtenstien, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 173. [12] N.T. Khoa, M.W. Pyun, D.H. Yoo, S.W. Kim, J.Y. Leem, E.J. Kim, S.H. Hahn, Thin Solid Films 520 (2012) 5417. [13] N.T. Khoa, S.W. Kim, D.-H. Yoo, E.J. Kim, S.H. Hahn, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 469 (2014) 159. [14] A.H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N.M.R. Peres, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 109. [15] K.T. Chan, H. Lee, M.L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 035405. [16] G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 14251. [17] P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) B864. [18] W. Kohn, L. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) A1133. [19] D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 7892.