Fluorescence probing study of the effect of medium chain-length alcohols on the properties of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide aqueous micelles

Fluorescence probing study of the effect of medium chain-length alcohols on the properties of tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide aqueous micelles

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS Volume 76, number 1 FLUORESCENCE PROBING ON THE PROPERTIES P. LIANOS OF THE EFFECT OF MEDIUM CHAIN-LENGTH OF TETRADE...

287KB Sizes 6 Downloads 74 Views

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

Volume 76, number 1

FLUORESCENCE

PROBING

ON THE PROPERTIES

P. LIANOS

OF THE EFFECT

OF MEDIUM

CHAIN-LENGTH

OF TETRADECYLTRIMETHYLAMMONHJM

BROMIDE

ALCOHOLS

AQUEOUS

MICELLES

and R. ZANA

Centre de Recherchcs

Recewed

STUDY

15 November 1980

ntr les Macron~ol&ules,

CNRS. 6 7083 Strasbourg, Cedtq

France

26 June 1980; IJI final form 19 August 1980

The tluorescence decay of mrcclle-mcorporated py rcne hns been used to dsrermme the m~celle aggegaaon number upon addltlon of butanol, pcntanol and hexanol. The changes of 11,of the monomer pyrens fluorescence MetIme, and the polanry of the probe mKrocn%onment

are discussed m terms of rhe alcohol solubihzanon

III the mwzllc

n

of

pabsnde

layer,whrch mcrcases the mIcelIe zonlzatlon degree.

1. Introduction

In the first part [l] of this senes studymg the effect of alcohol on the nucellar properties with the use of fluorescent probes, we investigated the formation of rmcelles of cetyltnmethylammonrum brormde (CTAB) in the presence of 1-butanol. Pyrene was used as fluorescent probe and the mam results were as follows: (1) part of the added butanol was adsorbed in the micelle pahsade layer, that is, m the layer contammg the polar heads of the aggregated surfactant molecules, (3) this adsorption (or solubdization) resulted in a large decrease of the surfactant aggregation number; (3) the environment of the micelle-solubdized pyrene became less polar as the alcohol &solved m the rrucelles; and (4) the composition of the mixed CTAB + I-butanol micelles was deternuned. In the present work we have largely extended the domain by studymg the effect of me&urn chamlength alcohols, 1-butanol, 1-pentanol and l-hexanol, on the properties of tetradecylrnmethylammonium brormde (TTAB) aqueous rrucelles with particular emphasis on the effect of the surfactant and alcohol concentrations on the surfactant awegahon number, on the fluorescence hfeme of the micelle-solubilized pyrene and on the effective polanty of the ennronment of the probe. As shown below, the results gve a good picture of the effect of alcohol on Ehe rmcellar structure, wluch 62

is consstent with a recently developed model [2]. Future extensions of this work \vlll apply to microemulsions wluch are thermodynarmcally stable, transparent, monophaslc systems generally obtamed by addmg od to the ternary system [3] H?O/surfactant + co-surfactant. Microemulnons are of conslderable practlcal importance, particularly m the process of tertiary od recovery.

2. Materials and methods All alcohols used were obtamed from Fluka (punssimum grade). Pyrene (Fluka, punssunum) was used without further purifkation while TTAD (Aldrich) was recrystalhzed three times from ethylacetate. The cntical rmcellar concentration (CIVIC)in the absence of alcohol was deternuned by conductivity to be 3.6 X 1O-3 M, m excellent agreement with reported values. The mtroduction of pyrene m the micelles was done as previously reported [ 11. The polarity sensitive vibronic structure of the monomer pyrene fluorescence spectrum was used to detect the adsorptlon of alcohol m the pabsade layer of the micelle. The ratio of the intensltles of the first over the third (f1/13) vibronic peak of the above spectrum

increases

with

the effective

polarity

of

the micro-

ennronment of the probe taking the lowest value in ahphailc hydrocarbon and among the highest m aque-

Volume

76, number

1

CHEhIlCAL

PHYSICS

15 November

LETTERS

1980

200 0

9I.I.I. 02

03

-

cfi(M/P) 06

0

004

Fg 1. Effect of alcohol on the fluorescence decay tune of monomer pyrene mcorporarcd at 10m5 hl mo 3YrAB mrccks

FI_~ 2. (a) Decrease of the surfactant

- X - butanol, -o- pentanol, and -cl- hekanol. Surfactant concentration 0.05 hI.

solution of

the pmsencc of rncreasm_e amounts

ITi\B

he%rnol. (b)

-X

-

aggregatton of alcohol

liutanol. -e-

Increase of 11 wth

CWI?) 1 . I 016 Q20

QO8 012

number

n III

III a 0.05 M

pcntanol; and -o-

mcreasing TTAB

concentm

tron for a mr_\turc water +0.1 hl pentanoL

tlon of alcohol (pentanol) was fixed at 0.2 ikl and the concentration was mcreased from 0.0 to 0.2 hi

TTAB

wrth mcreasing surfactant explained by the solubilrzatron of alcohol m the mrcellar palisade layer. We have calculated the average number tr,& of alcohol molecules per aggregated surfactant molecule in each mrcelle from the estimated partitton coefficient K of I-pentanol between the aqueous and the mrcekr phase accordmg to the following equation 12,151 vahd for farrly dilute solutrons: and its decay hme decreased

concentration.

(table 3). Thus IS eqmvalent to dissolving the surfactant m a new solvent (water + 0.2 bl pentanol mixture). The CMC for TTAB III ths nuxture is below 0.001 hi [2], thus nucelles were formed at ah hsted values of C. A monotonic mcrease of II was then observed wth increasmg C (fig. 2b and table 3, column 2). As seen in table 3 (cohnnn 6) this fact was not observed m the absence of alcohol where a relatrvely small increase of PI was observed only for C> 0.15 M. krspecnon of table 3 reveals an mterestmg feature. The effective polanty of the probe environment mcreased Table

agam

is

li’ = (CA- Cv/)/C\~(C+ CA =

chlk*

-

C&&C +

chI)

-

qfr) ,

3

TTAB concentratron W-l

Ratiolr/Is of the monomer pyre”2 fluorescence

Surfmzt~r aggregatton number, n

0.008

0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 a) These values have been calculated depends

n&

on CA_ The equonon

IS

Decxr) rune of the free monomer pyrcne (ns)

Rat10 n*/n 4

-

n III the absence of alcohol

1.95

100

27

1.30

293

1.51

-

29 33 50 71 110

1.31 1.31 1.34 1.36 1.46

181 254 246 224 207

1.46 1.27 0.95 0.71 0.49

68 65 66 66 85

0.0

case

l3us

assummg

the part~tron coefiicrcnt

K = 13/(1 7 4.4

CA)

has

been proposed

K constant

and equal to 3.2 M-t.

--

In fact it is likely that K

[ 171 \rhxh > wlds K = 6.9 hl-' for CA = 0.1 XI.In thst

calculated to be lugher. particularly at low surfactant concentratrons, and to decrease upon mcreasmgC from 8.8

to 0.7. These numerical

changes

do not affect

the dtscusnon

grren m the text.

65

where chl and cw are the concentrations of miceUe and water solubtied alcohol in mole per liter of solution. The results for the water + 0.3 M pentanol rnncture are shown in table 3 (column 5; K was taken equal to 3.2 M-l [2]). It is seen then that nA/n, that is the average number of alcohol molecules around each surfactant molecule, decreases ~th increasmg C. Thisin turn, mcreasesthe amount of water in the

micelle palisade layer and therefore its dielectnc constant and the average number of bound bromide ions [2]. Thus on the one hand the effective polarity mcreases and on the other the increased encounters with Br- result m decreased 7. At low C the values of II&Z are so high that the micelIes can be considered as saturated with alcohol. For this reason II/I3 changes only slightly for C < 0.1 M, even though n&z decreases substantially in this range, but increases more rapidly at h&er surfactant concentration (table 3, column 3). This initial slow increase of the effective polarity rmght give the unpression that the bulk phase rather rhan the mice&u

surface

dete -es

it.

How-

ever, as seen from table 3, I J13 for pyrene lssolved in the water + 0.2 M pentanol nuxture, in the absence of TTAB, IS much higher (1.95) than any of the observed values m the presence of micelles. Increase of II/13 and decrease of 7 with increasing C for a pven alcohol concentration was also observed with butanol and hexanol as can be seen from table 2. The decrease of n upon mcreasmg CA at low surfactant concentration and the near constancy or mcrease of pzwith CA at C> 0.1 M, for the TT&lpentanol and TTAB-I-hexanol systems, can be now explamed as follows. At low surfactant concentration the repulsions between micelles are weak as the mter-

micellar lstance is large. In the presence of a large excess of alcohol, the average number of micellesolu@lized alcohol molecules per micelhzed surfactant molecule nA/n is large. This results m a large mcrease of the Ionization degree p which breaks down the origmal micelles into smaller ones [2]. The imtially weak repulsions between miceUes do not hinder this process much. At high surfactant concentration, the repulsions between miceUes are strong. In the expenmental contitsons of this work the alcohol is no longer m excess and nA/n is much smaller. Neverthe-

less the solubtiation of alcohol into the miceUes results in an increase of p, although smaller than at low C. and therefore the electrostatic repulsions between

66

15 November 1980

CHEhlICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

Volume 76, number 1

micelles become even stronger. Micelles then have to grow by partial mergmg in order to mcrease the intermicellar &stance, and thus reduce their mutual repulsions. The effects just discussed will be the more pronounced the longer the alcohol chain length, as the alcohol partition coefficient between micelies and the aqueous phase mcreases by a factor of 3 per additional methylene‘group As mentioned

121.

above, increase of the surfactant aggregatlon number with mcreasmg C was not observed m the absence of alcohol at moderate surfactant concentrations (table 3, column 6) contrary to what was observed in the presence of alcohol. n is m fact determined by the difference &! - & between the standard chemical potentials of the surfactant in the aqueous and nucellar phase, respectively [ 161. in pure water thus lfference depends only slightly on the surfactant concentration. In the presence of alcohol, however, which ptitions between aqueous and the micellar phase in a manner depending on both micellar

and alcohol

concentrations

and alcohol

chain

length, the alcohol mole fraction in the micelles is large and & is changed, which m turn results in changes of TV.

Acknowledgement The authors are extremely grateful to Professor G. Laustriat (FacultC de Pharmacie, Laboratoire de Phynque, Strasbourg) for making available his facilities for all measurements of the present work.

References t11 P. Llanos and R. Zana, Chen Phys. Letters 72 (1980) 171.

[21 R. Zana, S. YN,C. Strazlelle and P. Llanos, J. Collold Interface Sci., to be pubhshed.

t31 K.L. Mittal, ed., hkellization, solubtiatlon and microemulsions, Vols. 1 and 2 (Plenum Press, New York, 1977). 141 P. Lianos and S. Ceorghiou, Photochem. PhotobioL 30 (1979) 355.

r51 K. Kalyanasundaram and J.K. Thomas, J. Am. Chem sot. 99 (1977) 2039.

[61 K_ Kal>ans.undaram, J.K.

Chsm.

Sot

Rev. 7 (1978) 453;

Thomas, Accounts Chem. Res. 10 (1977) 133.

Volume 76, number

1

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

[ 71 S. Atrk, hl. Nam and L.A. Smger, Chem. Phys. Letters 67 (1979) 75. [8] PP. Infelta and M. GrZtzel, J. Chem. Phys. 70 (1979) 179. [9] J.B. Brrks, Photophysrcs of aromatrc molecules (WdeyInterscrence, New York, 1970). [lo] R. McNeil and J.K. Thomas, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 73 (1980) 522. [ 1 l] P. Lurnos, AK hInkhopadyay and S. Georghrou, Photothem [

Photobml,

to

be

pubbshed.

121 P. Lianos and S. Georgh~ou, Photochrm. PhotobloL 29

(1979) 843. [13] P. Lianos, B. Luu and D. Gerard, 3. Chrm. Phys., to be pubhshed.

15 November

1980

1141 E. Vtkmgstad and 0. Kvammen, J. Collotd Interface Sci 74 (1979) 16, J. Larsen and L. Teplcy, J. ColIoid Interface Sci. 49 (1974) 113. J. Rassing and E. Wyn ]lSl J. Gettmps, D. HaB. P. Job@. Jones, J. Chem. Sot. Faraday Trans. II 74 (1978) 1957. tl6] C.Tanford, J. Phys. Chem. 78 (1974) 2*9; J. Israelachvrli, D. MttcheU and 8. Ninham. J. Chem. Sot. Faraday Trans. II 72 (1976) 1525; E. Ruckenstein and R. NCI~ZU~J~, J. Phyr Chem 79 (1975) 2622. J_ CoUoid [I71 S. Yrv, R. Zana, 1X”. Ulbncht and H. Hoffmnann, Interface SIX, to be published.

67