Force field, centrifugal distortion constants, coriolis constants and mean amplitudes for trifluoroacetonitrile

Force field, centrifugal distortion constants, coriolis constants and mean amplitudes for trifluoroacetonitrile

Journal of Molecular Structure Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Printed in the Netherlands FORCE FIELD, CONSTANTS TRILE J. A. FANIRAN* Depa...

437KB Sizes 0 Downloads 66 Views

Journal of Molecular Structure Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Printed in the Netherlands

FORCE

FIELD,

CONSTANTS TRILE J. A. FANIRAN*

Department S.

CENTRIFUGAL

DISTORTION

AND MEAN AMPLITUDES

AND

49

CONSTANTS,

CORIOLIS

FOR TRIFLUOROACETONI-

H. F. SHURVELL

of Chemistry,

Queen’s University,

Kingston

(Canada)

J. CYVIN

Institute of Theoretical

Chemistry,

Technical

University

of Norway,

TrondIzeim (Norway)

(Received March 29th, 1971)

ABSTRACT

CaIculations

of valence force fields for CF,CN

have been carried out.

Several sets of force constants have been found to reproduce the observed frequencies exactly. The best of these has been selected on the basis of the qualitative description of the normal modes given by the potential energy distribution and the agreement between experimental and calculated values of centrifugal distortion constants and Coriolis constants. Mean amplitudes of vibration and perpendicular amplitude correction coefficients have also been calculated for CF,CN.

INTRODUCTION

Force constants have been calculated by Edge11 and Potter1 and Galasso and Bigotto* for CF3CN. However, the principal force constants differ greatly between the two calculations. Since these constants are essential for the description of the normal modes of CF,CN and since no potential energy distributions are available from the previous calculations, we have undertaken a recalculation of the normal coordinates for this molecule. Several sets of force constants have been obtained that reproduce our observed frequencies3. A final force field was fixed on the basis of an examination of the potential energy distributions and the comparison between observed and calculated centrifugal distortion constants OJ, D JK and DK and the Coriolis 5 constants. * Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Mol.

Structure,

10 (1971) 49-55

50

J. A. FANIRAN,

FORCE CONSTANT

H. F. SHURVELL,

S. J. CYVIN

CALCULATIONS

The Wilson FG matrix method4 was used to obtain force fields for CF,CN. The symmetry coordinates used were the same as those of Brunvoll and Cyvin”. The G matrix was calculated using the following structural parameters6: r = C-F = 1.33 A, R = C-C = 1.5 A, D = C=N = 1.15 A, cc = Fa fi =C!?

= 1 lO”42’ and 4 = C?N

= 180”. The calculations

= 108”30’,

were carried out:

(a) on an IBM 360/50 computer using a program written by Schachtschneider7 and modified by Brooks8; and (b) with the ALGOL program series of Cyvin et al. adapted to a UNIVAC 1108 computer. Several sets of force constants were examined. Different approaches were applied on the basis of valence coordinates on one hand and the symmetry coordinates on the other. Table 1 shows our final force field in terms of the symmetry coordinate?; it is among the sets which reproduce the observed frequencies3 exactly. During the evaluation of force constants it was found necessary to introduce several interaction terms. Particularly for the CF stretching and the relatively large CF/CF interaction constants we get f, = 5.80 mdyn/A and f,, = 1.30 mdyn/A, respectively. The CN and CC stretching constants from our final set arefD = 18.00 mdyn/A andf, = 5.60 mdyn/A, respectively. TABLE

1

SYMMETRY

FORCE

CONSTANTS

(IN

mdyn/W) FOR CFJCN

Species a, 8.405 0.677

5.597

0.565 0.295

0.332 -0.476

18.000 -0.287

0.690 0.012

0.415

0.018

0.083

Species

0.742

e

4.504 -0.227 -0.001 0.050

POTENTIAL

ENERGY

0.189

DISTRIBUTION

gives a qualitative picture of each The potential energy distribution7-g vibrational mode. PED’S were calculated for every set of force constants obtained in the present work. Apart from the a, fundamental at 2275 cm-l, the various sets J. Mol. Structure,

10 (1971) 49-55

FORCE TABLE

FIELD

FOR

TRIFLUOROACETONITRILE

51

2

VIBRATIONAL

FREQUENCIES

(IN

Cm-‘)

Species a1

k5.0

SI (C-F) &
0.003 0.132

0.886 0.003

Species e S, (C-F) WFCF) S3(CCF) S,(CCN)

VS

AND

POTENHAL

v2

ENERGY

DISTRIBUTION

FOR

CF&N

V3

v4

801.7

52z.o

0.591

0.436

0.005

0.409

0.370

0.079 0.325

0.165

0.033 0.117

0.012 0.642

V-I

V8

0.060 0.868 0.001 0.005

0.026 0.007 0.764 0.638

1227.2

Z214.3

FZ8.3

0.797 0.145 0.106 0.035

0.139 0.001 0.225 0.425

462.7

196.0

of force constants gave different descriptions of the normal modes. The force field of Table 1 is consistent with the PED as given in Table 2 along with the vibrationa frequencies. The description of normal modes according to the PED is compatible with approximate descriptions based on the group vibration concept. The PED indicates that the C=N stretching vibration is largely uncoupled. About 10 o? contribution from C-C stretching is as predicted theoretically” for C=N stretching modes in the nitriles. The potential energy distribution also shows that the C-F stretch coupled with the C-C stretch gives rise to both v2 and vs. v2 also invokes some FCF bending. The v, mode arises from FCF bending with some admixture of C-C stretching. In species e there is considerable mixing between v6 and vs, while it is natural to assign these frequencies to CFs deformation and CCN linear bending, respectively. This feature suggests that some improvements of the force field might possibly be achieved, but no further refinements were found to be necessary at the present stage for this reason alone. In moIecuIes of the CFsX and CXs-CY type, it has been observedll*‘Z that C-F stretching vibrations are found in the range 1400-1000 cm-‘, while C-C stretching frequencies lie between 1000 and 750 cm-‘. These modes are certainly mixed in these compounds.

CENTRIFUGAL

DISTORTION CONSTANTS

Expressions for .the rotational distortion constants DJ, DJK and DK of a symmetric top molecule as a function of the force constants have been given by Kivelson and WilsonL3. A computer program was written for calculating these .I. Mol. Slructure,10 (1971) 49-55

52 TABLE

J. A. FANIRAN,

H. F. SHURVELL,

8. J. CYVIN

3

CENTRIFUGALDISTORTIONCONSTANTS(IN

kc/set) FOR CF,CN

AND RELATED MOLECULES

Atdtors

DJ

D JK

DK

Reference

Present work

0.28

6.29

-5.08

-

Galasso

-4.50

0.31

5.60

Burrus and Gordy

and Bigotto

0.31

5.81

-

15

CF&CH

0.24

0.63

-4.80”

16

CF&CD

0.26

0.62

-4.60”

16

2

a These values were taken from ref. 2.

constants from sets of force constants that reproduced the observed frequencies. The elements (J&J, were evaluated by the methods of Cyvin and Hagen14 in terms of the equilibrium position vectors Xz, Y,’ and 2: of the atoms a of the molecule. The values of D,, DJK and D, obtained for the force constants of Table 1 are given in Table 3. This table also includes the observed centrifugal distortion constants of CF,CN and the related molecules CF,CCH and CF,CCD2V’5S’6. The present vahres are all seen to have the right orders of magnitude. A better quantitative agreement with observed values could be desired, but the results are reasonably satisfactory.

CORIOLIS COUPLING

CONSTANTS

Two experimental determinations of Coriolis constants for CF3CN have been made3#“_ in the present work the [= matrix, which contains the most important Coriolis constants for a symmetric top molecule, was evaluated from the relations of Meal and Polo l* . This method involves the evaluation of the C= and L matrices_ C= was obtained from the B matrix, which is made up from the Wilson s vectors4, and L was taken from the present normal coordinate analysis. The results are shown in Table 4, with values obtained by other methods. TABLE

4

CALCULATED

AND

EXPERIMENTAL

VALUES

OF

CORIOLIS

COUPLING

CONSTANTS

Source

5s

56

57

58

This work

0.87

0.78

-0.80

0.41

Ref. 3

0.76

0.69

-0.24

0.16

Ref. 17

0.84

0.68

-

0.42

L Mol.

Structure,

10 (1971)49-S

FOR

CF&N

FORCE

FIELD

FOR

53

TRIFLUOROACETONITRILE

The calculated results display a generally good agreement with observed values_ The [ values are known to be very sensitive to changes in the force fieId.

This feature was confirmed during the present analysis; the values of C6,C7 and CR even changed sign during our evaluation of the force field.

MEAN

AMPLITUDES

OF VIBRATION

AND

SHRINKAGE

EFFECT

The developed force field was used to calculate the mean amplitudes of vibrationlg and reiated quantities by standard methods with the aid of a wellestablished computer program. The results of calculated mean amplitudes (I) are given in Table 5 along with perpendicuIar amplitude correction coefficients (K). Also the linear shrinkage effect for the CCN chain was computed, and gave the results of 0.0057 A and 0.0082 A at 0 “K and 298 “K, respectiveiy. AI1 these quantitieslg are of great interest in modern gas electron diffraction studies. The molecules CF,CN and CH,CN have been investigated” by the visual method of electron diffraction_ Temperature factors, which are related to the mean amplitudes, have been used in that investigation but no reliable values of I can presumably be extracted from the material. Also the mean amplitudes from the more recent electron diffraction investigation of CCI,CNZ1 are very inaccurate. In that work a visual interpretation

of sectored photographs

was employed.

The magnitudes of all the mean amplitudes calculated here are reasonable. The I values for the bonded distances agree well with the data of Galasso and Bigotto2. These values (see TabIe 6) were deduced from the reported mean-square amplitude quantities ‘. Table 6 shows a comparison between mean amplitudes for some related distances in CF,CN and other molecules. The different types; of distances are found to have fairly characteristic mean amplitude values. This is true especially for the C&N mean amphtude TABLE MEAN (K)

in accord with previous experiencelg.

5 AMPLITUDES

FOR

CF,CN;

Distance

C-F C-C

_

OF IN

VIBRATION A

(0

AND

PERPENDICULAR

AMPLITUDE

CORRECTION

COEFFIECIENTS

UNITS

Equil. dist. G-0

1 0°K

298 “K

0°K

298 “K

(1.330)

0.0450

0.0455

0.0025

0.0037

0.0464

0.0020

0.0021

(1 SOO)

0.0459

K

CzN

(1.150)

0.0344

0.0344

0.0056

0.0098

C .. .N

(2.650)

0.0490

0.0497

0.0019

0.0037

C---F

(2.326)

0.0596

0.0705

0.0014

0.0018

N---F

(3.354)

0.0717

0.0977

0.0008

0.0015

F...F

(2.159)

0.0546

0.059 1

0.0018

0.0034

J. Mol. Siructure, 10 (1971) 49-55

54

J. A. FANIRAN,

TABLE

H. F. SHURVELL,

S. J. CYVIN

6 OF CALCULATED

COMPARISON DIFFERFHT

MEAN AMPLITUDES

(IN

A)

AT 298 “K

FOR

RELATED

DISTANCES

IN

MOLECULES

F...F

Ref.

0.0497

0.0591

present

0.0340

..

..

2

0.0343

0.0504

-

22

0.0345

0.0483

-

23

-

-

0.0547

19

Molecule

C-F

C-C

CEN

c,

CF&N

0.0455

CO464

0.0344

CF&N

0.0456

0.0486

CH&N

-

0.0476

CICCCN

-

0.0453

=CF,

0.0433

-

..N

CONCLUSIONS

A reasonable force field has been found for CFsCN. The potential energy distribution gives a plausible qualitative description of the normal modes and the calculated values of the centrifugal distortion constants and Coriolis constants are in satisfactory agreement with experimental values of these quantities. No claim is made for uniqueness of the force field reported here. However, we have found that although other force fields reproduce the observed frequencies exactly, they are inferior. Either the qualitative description that they give of the normal modes is less satisfactory, or the calculated values of the Coriolis constants are not in agreement with experimental values. On the other hand all the force fields obtained in the present work gave acceptable values for the centrifugal distortion constants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully Council of Canada.

acknowledge

the financial support

of the National

Research

REFERENCES 1 W.

F. EDCELL AND E. M. POTTER, J. Chem. Phys., 24 (1956) 80.

~V.GALASSO

AND A. BICOITO, Spectrochim. Actu, 21 (1965) 2085. 3 J. A. FANIRAN AND H. F. SHURVELL, Spectrochim. Actu, in press. 4 E. B. WILSON, J. C. DECNS AND P. C. CROSS, Molecular Wbrutions, McGraw-Hill,

New

1955. J. Mol. Structure, 6 (1970) 289. qiss. Abstr., 19 (1958) 50. 7 J. H. SCHACHTSCHNEIDER, Technical Report No. 57-65, Shill Development Co.;1965.

5 3. BRUNVOLL

AND S. J. CYVIN,

6 R. E. fbDERSON; 8. W.

V. F. B~~&+private

9 Y. M&&o

.i. Mol. Strut+

communication..

AND K~&rrsu,‘J. .’ -10,(i971):49-55

Chem. Phys., 20 (1952) X80&

York

FORCE

FIELD

FOR

TRIFLUOROACETONITRILE

55

10 S. BESNAINOU. B. THOMAS AND S. BRATOZ. J. Mol. Soectrux.. 21 (1966) 113. -Van Nostrand, New 11 G. HERZBERG~ Infrared and Raman Spectra of Polyhtomic h&x&es, York, 1945. 12 M. ST. C. FLETT, Characteristic Frequencies of CfiemicaZ Groups in the Infrared, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1963. 13 D. KIVEL~~N AND E. B. WILSON, JR., J. Chem. Phys., 20 (1952) 1575; 21 (1953) 1229. 14 S. J. CW~N AND G. HAGEN, Chem. Phys. Left., 1 (1968) 645. 15 C. A. BIJRRUSAND W. GORDY, J. Chem. Phys., 26 (1957) 391. 16 W. E. ANDERSON, R. TRAMBARULO, J. SHERIDAN AND W. GORDY, Phys. Rev., 82 (19.51) 58. 17 R. W. VALENTINE, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1957. 18 J. H. MEAL AND S. R. POLO, J. Chem. Phys., 24 (1956) 1119, 1126. 19 S. J. CYVIN, Molecular Vibrations and Mean Square Amplitudes, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, and Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1968. 20 M. D. DANFORD AND R. L. LIVINGSTON, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 77 (1955) 2944. 21 R. L. LIVINGSTON, W. L. PAGE AND C. N. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 82 (1960) 5048.

22 S. J. CYVIN AND V. DEVARAJAN,J. Mol. Structure, in press. 23 P. KLABOE, E. KLOSTER-JENSEN AND S. J. CYVIN, Spectrochim.

Acta, 23A

J. Mol.

(1967) 2733.

Structure,

10 (1971)

49-55