Formation of a phosphoramide mustard-nucleotide adduct that is not by alkylation at the N7 position of guanine

Formation of a phosphoramide mustard-nucleotide adduct that is not by alkylation at the N7 position of guanine

BIOCHEMICALAND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 843-850 Vo1.163, No. 2,1989 September 15,1989 FORMATION OF A PHOSPHORAMIDE MUSTARD-NUCLEOTID...

382KB Sizes 0 Downloads 30 Views

BIOCHEMICALAND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 843-850

Vo1.163, No. 2,1989 September 15,1989

FORMATION OF A PHOSPHORAMIDE MUSTARD-NUCLEOTIDE ADDUCT THAT IS NOT BY ALKYLATION AT THE N7 POSITION OF GUANINE Alexander E. Maccubbin, L I ~ Caballes, Girish B. Chheda*, Robert F. Struck-- and Hira L. Gurtoo Grace Cancer Drug Center and *Department of Biophysics Roswell Park Memorial Institute 666 Elm Street, Buffalo, NY 14263 **Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL 35255 Received July 28, 1989

SUMMARY: The reaction of 2'-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate with phosphoramide mustard resulted in the formation of several adducts. One of these adducts was formed by linking phosphoramide mustard to the phosphate group of 2'-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate rather than by the generally accepted mechanism involving alkylation at the N7 position of guanine. Thls adduct served as an acceptor for the transfer of 32p from [y32p]ATP by polynucleotlde kinase and thus could be detected by the sensitive 32p_ postlabeling assay. ®1989 A c a d e m i c Press, Inc. Metabolism of

the

antlcancer agent cyclophosphamide results

production of the reactive (Figure l)

(1,2).

metabolltes acrolein

in

the

and phosphoramide mustard

Phosphoramide mustard is generally considered to be the

therapeutlcaily active metabolite responsible for the antitumor activity of cyclophosphamlde

(2-5).

A number of

studies have demonstrated that

phosphoramlde mustard alkylates guanine at the 7 position (6-11). been suggested that

this

alkylatlng

activity,

involving

It

has

formation of

monoadducts and cross-links, is responsible for the therapeutic activity of cyclophosphamlde (6,7,11). We have been studying cyclophosphamide:DNA adducts to determine their nature and their role in the biological activity of cyclophosphamide, and to develop ultrasensitlve analytical adducts.

methods for

the quantification

of

such

We report, here, the formation of a novel adduct that does not

involve N7 alkylatlon of guanine but rather Is the result of the formation of phosphoester linkage between phosphoramlde mustard and 2'-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate.

T h l s phosphoester adduct was formed In addition to N7

alkylation products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. 2'-deoxyguanoslne, 2'-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate, 2'-deoxyguanoslne 5'-monophosphate and 2'-deoxyguanosine 3',5'-bisphosphate were

843

0006-291X/89 $1.50 Copyright © 1989 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1989

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 4-Hydroxycyclophosphomide

Cyclophosphomide ClCHzCH2

H N

MFO, NADPH

\ / / N-P~O

CICHzCH2

H

OH

CH ;CH2

N

\N-P~O

?H 2

O

CICH2CH2

/

CH2

ClCH2CH2

0

CH 2

Acrolein H

CH; C - C

H 0

CICHzCH2

CICHzCH2 \

NH

/N-t° CICHzCH2

NHz

0

2

H C=O \

/c"2

CH2

Aldophosphamide

\N_p/_-O

I

/

\

CICH2CH2

OH

Phosphoromide Mustord

BINDING TO NUCLEOSIDE 3' MONOPHOSPHATE OR DNA

NUCLEOSIDE3'PHOSPHOESTERADDUCT (SUCH AS PEAK A)

ALKYLATION OF GUANINEAT N7 YIELDING FINAL PRODUCTSAFTER ACID HYDROLYSIS

I

ACID HYDROLYSIS i

NUCLEASEP1

1 N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-[2-(7-guanmyl)ethyl]amine(NOR-G) 2 N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-[2-(7-guanmyl)ethyl]amine(NOR-G-OH) 3 NN-bis-[2-(7guaninyl)ethyl]amine(G-NOR-G)

i BASE + PHOSPHOESTER ADDUCT

Figure l:

NUCLEOSIDE + PHOSPHOESTER ADDUCT

Metabollsm of cyclophosphamide and binding of phosphoramide mustard to nucleotides.

purchased f r o m Pharmacia. Guanine, nuclease P], K2HPO 4 and KH2PO 4 were obtained from Sigma. 32p-postlabeling materials have been previously described (12,13). Phosphoramide mustard was kindly provided by the Drug Development Branch of the NCI, and N7 alkylated products of guanine were prepared as previously described ( ] l ) . [Chloroethyl-3H] cyclophosphamide (specific activity 460 mCi/mmole) was purchased from Amersham. Incubation of 2'-Deoxyquanosine 3'-MonosDhosDhate with PhQsphoramide Mustard. One mg of 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate and 6 mg of phosphoramlde mustard were incubated for 6h in 1 ml of O.IM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The reaction mixture was then analyzed uslng a Waters HPLC system using a Supelcosll LC-18-S (Supelco, Inc.) reversed phase Cl8 column. The elution was performed with an i n i t i a l 1socratic run of 50 mM KH2PO4 buffer (pH 4.0) containing 2.5% methanol for 3 minutes followed by a linear 844

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1989

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

gradient to 20% methanol in 50 mM KH2PO4 over 12 min at a flow rate of l ml/min. A fraction containing Peak A was collected and dried. The sample was redissolved in 50 mM ammonium formate buffer (pH 4.5) and analyzed on the same HPLC system, using a Vydac Cl8 column (Vydac 20]TPI04, distributed by Alltech), by elution wlth 50mM ammonium formate buffer for 5 minutes followed by a linear gradient incorporating 20% acetonitrile into this buffer over 20 minutes at a flow rate of l ml/mln. Peak A, purified from several runs, was pooled and used for Its characterization. PreParation of Tritium Labeled Peak A. In order to generate 3H-labeled phosphoramlde mustard to produce 3H-labeled Peak A, i t was necessary to metabolize 3H-labeled cyclophosphamide. [3H] Cyclophosphamide, in the presence of 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate, was metabolized by p a r t i a l l y purified cytochrome P-450 in a reconstituted system as previously described (14). T h i s mixture was incubated overnight at 37°C and the reactlon was stopped by extraction with chloroform to remove protein and unmetabolized cyclophosphamlde. The aqueous layer after extraction was separated by HPLC and a fraction containing 3H-labeled peak A was collected. T h l s fraction was purified as described above to yield 3H-labeled Peak A. Characterization of Peak A. In order to determine i f Peak A could be detected at the low levels likely to be found in DNA, Peak A was tested for its s u i t a b i l i t y for detection by the 32p-postlabeling assay (12). An aliquot of purified Peak A (~l pmole) was dried in a SpeedVac rotary concentrator/drier (Savant Corp.) to remove ammonium formate buffer and was postlabeled wlth 32p essentially as previously described (12,13). Briefly, Peak A was incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes with 50 ~Ci of [y32p]ATP (specific a c t i v i t y >5000 Ci/mmole) and polynucleotide kinase. The postlabeled sample was diluted and I / I 0 of the diluted volume was spotted on a PEl-cellulose TLC plate. Two dimensional chromatography was then carried out using 2.25M ammonium formate, pH 3.5 for the f i r s t dimension and O.3M ammonium sulfate, buffered wlth NaH2PO4 to pH 7.5, for the second dimension. 32p-Labeled Peak A was detected by autoradiography. 32p-Labeled Peak A was eluted from the TLC plate with I.OM NaCl for analysis by HPLC and enzymatic hydrolysis. An aliquot of Peak A (NO.5 nmole) was also postlabeled by incubating i t with unlabeled ATP (600 pmo]e) and polynucleotide kinase. T h l s served as a UV-detectable standard for the bisphosphate of Peak A. Peak A and 32p-labeled peak A were treated with nuclease Pl to remove 3'-phosphate and the reaction products were separated by HPLC using KH2PO4 buffer as described above. Detection was by UV absorbance at 254 nm and fractions were collected at one minute intervals. Peak A and 3Hpeak A were hydrolyzed In O.IN HCI at 80°C for 20 minutes ( l l ) and the reaction products were analyzed by HPLC.

RESULTS Incubation

of

mustard resulted

2'-deoxyguanosine in the formation

3'-monophosphate

of

a number of

with

phosphoramide

products

that

separated by HPLC and detected by absorbance at 254 nm (Figure 2).

could

be

A major

peak, designated Peak A, eluted a f t e r 2'-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate and amounted to

approximately

(Figure 2B). >95%

pure

1.5-2.0%

as

determined

by

deoxynucleoside

the o r i g i n a l and p u r i f i e d

HPLC.

yielded a single spot that migrated, unmodified

of

This peak was collected

amount of resulting

nucleotide

in a product

After 32p-postlabeling,

Peak

in both dimensions, more rapidly

3'-monophosphate 845

standards

that

A

than

had been post-

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1989

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

A .010

E

.005

c

to o4

L

0 0 C 0

I

I

0 ¢,1

Pe0k A

.010

.005

I 5

I I0

Retention

labeled

slmllarly

wlth

15

(min)

HPLC separation of 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate after incubation in O.IM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 6 hr at 37°C either alone (A) or wlth phosphoramlde mustard (B). A major reaction product, Peak A, was isolated and purified for further analysls.

Figure 2:

plate

Time

(Table

I).

32p-Labeled

Peak A,

eluted

from

1.0M NaCl and analyzed by HPLC, cochromtographed

the

with

TLC

a UV-

detectable standard of peak A that had been prepared by postlabeling Peak A with non-radioactive ATP (Figure 3B).

Table 1:

Two dimensional TLC Rf values for 32p-postlabeled compounds

Dimension ID 2D

a dA3'P dC3'P dG3'P dT3'P

= = = =

dA3'P

dC3'P

0.61 0.29

0.53 0.34

Compounda dG3'P 0.20 0.14

2'-deoxyadenosine 3'-monophosphate. 2'-deoxycytldlne 3'-monophosphate. 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate. 2'-deoxythymldlne 3'-monophosphate. 846

dT3'P 0.39 0.49

Peak A .74 .63

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1989

BIOCHEMICAL A N D BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

.05

L_

A

.04 .03

I .02 E e• 1" In OJ

.01

25

r- I

eO

~

~i i

.020

15~

i

m ~t .010 <~ .005

Io

I L.]

I

'

.025 .020

5

j"

C -15

,,,~ x

"3

l ] I

.015 .010 .005

- 20

I

.015

0

B

~-t_~

d

4

8

6

3

,_ 12

Retention Time (rain) HPLC proflles of postlabeled 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate (A) and peak A (B) and postlabeled peak A after treatment with nuclease Pl (C).

Figure 3:

Inltlal

characterization of

nuclease Pl that wlll 3'-mononucleotides, respectively. was treated

Peak A was by enzymatic hydrolysis

remove the 3'-phosphate group of

with

bisphosphates or

resulting in 5'-mononucleotide and nucleoside products,

32p-Labeled Peak A blsphosphate, eluted from TLC plates, wlth

nuclease Pl

at

demonstrated that essentlally all

37°C for

30 minutes.

authentic

2'-deoxyguanoslne 5'-monophosphate (Figure

digestion

of

unlabeled

2'-deoxyguanosine

Peak A,

HPLC analysis

the radioactiv|ty cochromatographed with i.e.,

3'-monophosphate,

3C).

Nuclease Pl

phosphoramlde mustard modified

resulted

in

a

product

that

cochromatographed wlth an authentic 2'-deoxyguanosine standard (Table 2). Peak A was also characterized for 20 minutes.

by acid hydrolysls in O.IN HCI at 80°C

HPLC analysls of acld hydrolyzed Peak A demonstrated the

presence of a product that cochromatographed wlth guanine but not NOR-G or NOR-G-OH (Table 2).

Moreover, when 3H-Peak A was acid

hydrolyzed,

the

radioactivity was found in the void volume and not with the N7 alkylated 847

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1 9 8 9 Table 2:

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

HPLC retention time of chemical standards and Peak A a f t e r enzymatic and chemical treatment

Compounda

Treatmentb

Retention Time (minutes)

dG3'P Peak A Guanine NOR-G NOR-G-OH dG3'P Peak A dG dG3'P Peak A Peak A dG3'5'P dG3'P Peak A dG5'P dG3'P Peak A

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... O.IN HCI O.IN HCI ..... NPI NPI NPI then O.IN HCI ..... PNK + ATP PNK + ATP ..... PNK + ATP then NPI PNK ÷ ATP then NPI

6.5 II.9 4.9 5.7 3.8 4.9, 6.5 4.9 14.4 14.4 14.4 4.9 2.4 2.4 3.7 7.0 7.0 7.0

adG3'P = 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate; NOR-G = N-(2-chloroethyl)-N[2-(7-guanlnyl)ethyl]amlne; NOR-G-OH = N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-[2-(7-guaninyl)ethyl]amlne; dG = 2'deoxyguanosine; dG3'5'P = 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3',5'-blsphosphate; dG5'P = 2'-deoxyguanoslne 5'-monophosphate. bO.IN HCI = O.IN HCI 80°C, 20 minutes; NPI = Nuclease Pi 37°C, 30 minutes; PNK + ATP = polynucleotide kinase plus ATP 37°C, 45 minutes. All retention times are from samples run on Supelcosil LC-18-S reversed-phase column using KH2P04 buffer as described in Materials and Methods.

products ( d a t a not

shown).

Finally,

acid hydrolysis of

nuclease P l - t r e a t e d

Peak A a l s o y i e l d e d a product t h a t cochromatographed w i t h guanine (Table 2).

DL#CUSSION It

Is commonly accepted that phosphoramide mustard derived from cyclo-

phosphamide reacts wlth DNA vla the a l k y l a t i o n of the N7 position of guanine (Figure

l).

We expected to

isolate

deoxynucleoslde 3'-monophosphates after

N7 alkylated treatment of

products the

as modifled

nucleotide

with

phosphoramlde mustard to test whether these adducts could serve as substrates for polynucleotlde klnase-catalyzed transfer of 32p from [y32p]ATP. However, among the reaction products obtained by the incubation of phosphoramlde mustard and 2-deoxyguanosine 3'-monophosphate was a major product that had characteristics d i f f e r e n t than the expected N7 a l k y l a t l o n products (Figure l ) . 32p-Postlabeling analysis demonstrated that t h l s product, Peak A, is a modified 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3'-monophosphate derivative that has retained the 3'-phosphate

group.

Polynucleotide

klnase 848

transferred

32p from

[y32p]_

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1 9 8 9

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

ATP to Peak A resulting in a modified 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3',5'-bisphosphate that could be separated from unmodified 2'-deoxyguanoslne 3',5'-bisphosphate and other 2'-deoxynucleoslde 3',5'-bisphosphates

by two dlmenslonal TLC and

HPLC. Enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of peak A yielded unmodified 2'-deoxyguanosine and guanine, respectively, 2'-deoxyguanoslne and guanine.

rather

than N7 alkylated

modified

These data suggest that 2'-deoxyguanosine

3'-monophosphate was modified by phosphoramide mustard to form a phosphodiester linkage with the 3'-phosphate group. Preliminary NMR data of Peak A are consistent with the identification of Peak A as a phosphodiester adduct. The signlficance of Peak A in the antitumor activity of cyclophosphamide has yet to be established.

We have detected this adduct in DNA treated wlth

phosphoramide mustard or

cytochrome P-450-metabollzed cyclophosphamide (a

detailed

report

therefore,

of

these studies is

in preparation).

It

would appear,

that Peak A is not an artifact of incubating the monomer, 2'-de-

oxyguanoslne

3'-monophosphate, with

phosphoramide mustard.

To

our

knowledge, only one other group has speculated on the possibllity of phosphoester adduct formation by cyclophosphamide (15,16). ing given the fact

that

most studies

This is not surpris-

examining DNA adducts formed by

phosphoramide mustard derived from cyclophosphamide have used 3H-labeled drug and have included acid hydrolysis of DNA to release adducts. data have shown, under these conditions,

Peak A is

unmodified guanine that would be devoid of radlolabel,

As our

destroyed to yield thus rendering i t

undetectable by radiometric methods. The formatlon of DNA adducts involving phosphate groups in phosphoester linkages has been reported for other antlcancer drugs (17).

The adduction

of nucleic acids by phosphoramide mustard may occur in an analogous manner. The phosphate ester adduct of phosphoramide mustard characterized in this report is relatively stable, except under very acidic conditions,

and may

represent a relatively persistent adduct. Moreover, phosphoester adducts can theoretically form with all nucleotldes and thus could potentially outnumber adducts formed by N7 alkylation of guanine. potential

for

stability, effects

of

wlde distribution

wlthin

nucleic

these adducts may contribute cyclophosphamide.

chemotherapeutic effects

At

Thus, given their

acids and their

signiflcantly

to

present, however, their

and toxicologic

effects

of

relative

the blologlcal role

in

the

cyclophosphamide is

unknown and will require further study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank Miss Karen Marie Schrader f o r preparation

of

this

manuscript.

This

CA-43567 and CA-24538. 849

work

her assistance in the

was supported

by NIH grants

Vol. 163, No. 2, 1 9 8 9

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCHCOMMUNICATIONS

REFERENCES I. Montgomery, J.A. and Struck, R.F. (1971). Prog. Drug. Res. 17, 320-409. 2. Friedman, O.M., Myles, A. and Colvin, M. (1979). Ln: Advances in Cancer Chemotherapy, A. Rosowsky (ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 143-204. 3. Connors, T.A., Cox, P.J., Farmer, P.B., Foster, A.B. and Jarman, M. (1974). B1ochem. Pharmacol. 23, 115-124. 4. Struck, R.F., Kirk, M.C., Witt, M.H. and Laster, W.R. Jr. (1975). Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 2, 46-42. 5. Colvin, M., Brundrett, R.B., Kan, M.N., Jardine, I. and Fenselau, C. (1976). Cancer Res. 36, 1121-1126. 6. Mehta, J.R., Przybylsk~, M. and Ludlum, D.B. (1980). Cancer Res. 40, 4183-4186. 7. Vu, V.T., Fenselau, C.C. and Colvln, O.M. (1981). 3. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 7362-7364. 8. Mehta, 3.R. and Ludlum, D.B. (1982). Cancer Res. 42, 2996-2999. 9. Chetsanga, C.3., Polldori, G. and Mainwaring, M. (1982). Cancer Res. 42, 2616-2621. I0. Kallama, S. and Hemm~nkl, K. (1984). Acta Pharmacol. Toxlcol. 54, 214-220. 11. HemmlnkI, K. (1985). Cancer Res. 45, 4237-4243. 12. Reddy, M.V., Gupta, R.C., Randerath, E. and Randerath, K. (1984). Carclnogenesls 5, 231-243. 13. Dunn, B.P., Black, 3.3. and Maccubbin, A. (1987). Cancer Res. 47, 6543-6548. 14. Struck, R.F., Kari, P., Kalln, 3., Montgomery, 3.A., Marlnello, A.J., Love, 3., Bansal, S.K. and Gurtoo, H.L. (1984). B1ochem. B1ophys. Res. Comm. 120, 390-396. 15. Lindemann, H. and Harbers, E. (1980). Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res. 30, 2075-2080. 16. Lindemann, H. (1984). Antlcancer Res. 4, 53-58. 17. Carter, C.A., Kirk, M.C. and Ludlum, D.B. (1988). Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 5661-5672.

850