Fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil

Fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil

Journal Pre-proof Fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil Dongwei Li, Chaochao Zhang, Guosheng Ding, Hua ...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 36 Views

Journal Pre-proof Fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil

Dongwei Li, Chaochao Zhang, Guosheng Ding, Hua Zhang, Junhao Chen, Hao Cui, Wangsheng Pei, Shengfu Wang, Lingshi An, Peng Li, Chang Yuan PII:

S0165-232X(18)30590-1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102942

Reference:

COLTEC 102942

To appear in:

Cold Regions Science and Technology

Received date:

20 December 2018

Revised date:

25 October 2019

Accepted date:

5 November 2019

Please cite this article as: D. Li, C. Zhang, G. Ding, et al., Fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil, Cold Regions Science and Technology(2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102942

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2019 Published by Elsevier.

Journal Pre-proof

Fractional Derivative-Based Creep Constitutive Model of Deep Artificial Frozen Soil Dongwei Li1*,2 , Chaochao Zhang1 , Guosheng Ding3 , Hua Zhang3 , Junhao Chen1 , Hao Cui4 , Wangsheng Pei2 , Shengfu Wang1 , Lingshi An1 , Peng Li1 , Chang Yuan1 1 School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

oo

f

2 State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences,

pr

Lanzhou 730000, China

e-

3 Fuzhou Metro Co. Ltd., Fuzhou 350004, China 4 Beijing China Coal Mine Engineering Co. Ltd, Beijing 100013, China

al

Pr

*Corresponding author: Dongwei Li, School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China

rn

Abstract: A fractional derivative constitutive model of deep artific ial frozen so il was

Jo u

established based on the Nishihara model by analyzing the triaxial creep and shear test results of

deep artific ial frozen soil under different confining pressures and temperatures. Considering the

physical and mechanical properties of frozen soil, linear Newton equations were substituted with

nonlinear Newton equations, and a flexibility matrix was derived for numerical calculations. A

relevant constitutive finite element program was developed and used to simulate a deep artific ial

frozen curtain of a coal mine through a user subroutine of the ADINA commerc ial finite element

software. The theoretical calculations agreed well with the experimental results of the triaxial

1

Journal Pre-proof

creep tests, and the numerical simulation results were consistent with the field measurement data.

This fractional derivative constitutive model was verified to describe the non-decaying creep

deformation characteristics of deep artific ial frozen soil under high confining pressures. It can

also be applied to the design and calculation of artificial freezing in deep strata.

oo

f

Keywords : fractional derivative constitutive model; triaxial creep characteristic; deep artific ial

e-

pr

frozen soil; numerical simulation

Pr

1 Introduction

al

Frozen soil is a special material that contains both unfrozen water and ice, and it creeps

rn

with time, that is, its deformation increases with time under constant load and its stress

Jo u

decreases with time under a certain deformation (Vyalov, 2013; Цытович, 1985). Because of the

strong rheological properties of frozen soil, an artific ial frozen curtain is vulnerable to excess ive

creep deformation before it is destructed or loses its bearing capacity, which may lead to the

rupture of freezing pipes. It is important to construct a rheological constitutive equation

reflecting the mechanical properties of frozen soil for the des ign of an artificial frozen curtain.

The deformation of frozen soil generally involves instantaneous elastic deformation and plastic

deformation, and the most notable feature is that irrevers ible creep develops continuous ly with

time, which is a s ignificant part of total deformation. The creep of frozen soil is an important 2

Journal Pre-proof

topic in frozen soil mechanics, and determining the creep inde x and establishing a creep

prediction model are essential to study the properties of frozen soil.

Several scholars have made great progress in understanding how frozen soil properties

change. Anders land et al. (Anders land and Akili, 1967) investigated the stress effect on creep

oo

f

rates of frozen soil and proposed a creep model for frozen soil based on the changes activation

pr

energy during frozen soil deformation. Ladanyi (Ladanyi, 1972; Ladanyi, 1975) presented a

e-

nonlinear yield criterion for frozen soil. Arenson et al. (Arenson et al., 2006) reviewed studies

Pr

on frozen soil creep. Ma et al(Ma et al., 1994) analyzed the triaxial creep law of frozen soil and

the influence of temperature and confining pressure on the creep strength of frozen soil and

al

proposed a creep strength criteria of frozen soil us ing a parabolic equation. Zhang et al

rn

(Changqing et al., 1995; Changqing et al., 1995) researched the creep damage characteristics of

Jo u

frozen soil with respect to its microstructure; Similarly Miao et al (Tiande et al., 1995) studied

the relationship between frozen soil creep and changes in its microstructure and proposed a

general creep damage theory for frozen soil. Yao et al (Yao et al., 2018) proposed a

one-dimens ional creep model for frozen soil taking temperature as an independent variable. Lai

et al. (Lai et al., 2009; Lai et al., 2010) carried out triaxial compression tests, and propos ed a

yield criterion and elasto-plastic damage constitutive model for frozen sandy soil. Liao et al.

(Liao et al., 2017) studied the creep damage characteristics of frozen soil with a fractional creep

3

Journal Pre-proof

constitutive model. Zhou et al.(Zhou et al., 2016) performed several triaxial creep tests on frozen

loess and established a constitutive model. Loria et al. (Loria et al., 2017) proposed a nonlinear

model to describe the mechanical behavior of artific ial frozen soil strata. Christ et al. (Christ et

al., 2009) studied the mechanical and acoustic characteristics of frozen soil under different

oo

f

temperatures and cycles. Li et al. (Li et al., 2011; Li et al., 2017) investigated the creep

characteristics and developed a constitutive model of artificial frozen soil under different

pr

confining pressures. Amiri et al. (Ghoreishian Amiri et al., 2016) proposed a constitutive model

e-

of saturated frozen soil. Zhao et al. (Zhao et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2017)

Pr

studied the cyclic direct shear behavior of an artific ial frozen silt-structure interface. Liu et al.

al

(Liu et al., 2018) proposed an elasto-plastic model for saturated frozen soils. Dong (Dong et al.,

rn

2014) conducted creep experiments to analyze the creep curves and creep index.

Jo u

The current creep model theory does not present an absolute solution to the entire

rheological behavior of frozen soil under high stress in deep alluvium. Although the Nishihara

model and the generalized Nishihara model are widely used in geotechnical engineering and

their theory is relatively complete, the models are based on an ideal linear element and the three

stages of the creep curve are ignored; thus, their results differ cons iderably from the actual creep

phenomenon of frozen soil under high stress. It is found that fractional calculus can be an

excellent mathematical instrument for modeling some phenomena, espec ially memory-intens ive

4

Journal Pre-proof

or path-dependent phenomena, and damping description may also be involved in. Fractional

order models also have the advantages of fewer parameters and s imple forms. It is known that

the mechanical behaviors of viscoelastic solids (Enelund et al., 2011), viscoelastic fluid (Hyder

Ali Muttaqi Shah et al., 2011), and hyperviscoelastic materials (Libertiaux et al., 2011), can be

oo

f

described by the fractional calculus. Zhou (Zhou et al., 2011) attempted to replace a Newtonian

dashpot in the c lassical Nishihara model (a mathematical model) with the fractional derivative

pr

Abel dashpot in his salt rock creep research. However, it is rarely investigated whether artific ial

Pr

e-

frozen soil can be modeled using fractional calculus.

This paper aims at developing a fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model of

al

artificial frozen soil under high stress. Analytic al formulas are derived and then validated

rn

through experimentally obtained data. A relevant constitutive finite element program is

Jo u

developed and used to s imulate a deep artificial frozen curtain of a coal mine. This research has

theoretical and practical s ignificance. It can be applied in artific ial ground freezing method in

deep coal mine excavation and subway tunnel engineering.

2 Triaxial Tests on Deep Artificial Frozen Soil

2.1 Test and scheme design

The frozen soil samples are representative clay samples obtained from a mine in Huainan,

their main phys ical and mechanical properties are shown in Table 1, and the grain s ize curve is 5

Journal Pre-proof

shown in Fig. 1. The soil s amples were prepared in batches us ing a standard sample preparation

method. Spec ifically, the on-site drilling samples were first crushed, dried, and sifted. Each wet

sample was remolded to meet a specific moisture content and then placed in an airtight,

non-evaporating environment for approximately 6 h to ensure uniform waterdistribution. Next,

oo

f

the wet soil was placed ins ide a special mold in layers and compacted to a specific dry bulk

dens ity under a certain consolidation pressure by the sample-making machine. The purpose of

pr

consolidation is to match the dry bulk dens ity of the samples to that of the natural soils at

e-

different depths. The consolidation confining pressure was determined according to the buried

Pr

depth of the stratum, and the consolidation processes were completed when the dens ities met the

al

requirements. The mold loaded with the wet soil was tightly sealed for approximately 24 h to

rn

shape the soil sample; then, the molded soil sample was cut into a standard cylindrical shape

Jo u

(diameter of 61.8 mm and height of 125 mm with a prec is ion control of 0.1 mm) . The sample

was rapidly frozen to temperatures of -5℃, -10℃, and -15℃ to avoid frost heave. After

refrigeration for 48 h, the samples were covered with a rubber sleeve to avoid moisture

evaporation before testing.

After the soil samples were prepared, a series of triaxial creep and shear tests as well as

uniaxial creep tests were carried out. To ensure the reliability of the test results, the loading

process and data acquis ition were controlled using a computer. The test scheme is shown in

6

Journal Pre-proof

Table 2.

Table 1 Physical and mechanical properties of conventional soil samples

Liquid

Moisture Sampling

Wet Density

Proportion

Dry Density

Content

Limit Il 3

Depth (m)

3

(g/cm )

(g/cm )

IP (%)

(n/ Gs)

2.038

1.679

3.709

(%)

47.5

27.5

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

34.52

oo

f

(%)

425.6

Plastic Limit

Fig. 1 Grain size distribution of the sample soil

Table 2 Scheme of triaxial test on deep artificial frozen soil Consolidation Test No.

Confining Pressure (MPa)

Stress

Temperature (℃)

7

Test Type

rate (N/s)

Journal Pre-proof

Triaxial creep test and

A-1

3.0

-5

A-2

3.5

-5

A-3

4.0

-10

A-4

5.0

-15

A-5

0

-10

B-1

4.0

-5

B-2

4.5

-10

B-3

5.0

-10

B-4

6.0

-15

B-5

0

C-1

5.0

C-2

6.0

triaxial shear test Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test

70

70

Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test

f

Uniaxial creep test

oo

Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test

70

70 70 110

C-4

e-

Pr -10

C-5

al rn

triaxial shear test

Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test Uniaxial creep test

110

110

110 110

Triaxial creep test and

-5

Jo u

C-3

pr

Triaxial creep test and

triaxial shear test

-10

6.5

-15

7.0

-15

0

-10

Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test

150

150

150

Triaxial creep test and triaxial shear test Uniaxial creep test

150 150

Note: Consolidation confining pressure is the confining pressure at which the consolidated sample is frozen. 2.2 Test results

(1) Triaxial shear test

Stress-strain curves of deep artific ial frozen soil under triaxial shear test were obtained 8

Journal Pre-proof

through a series of measurements, as shown in Fig. 2, where σ 1 -σ 3 denotes the deviatoric stress, and ε1 denotes the vertical strain; the p-q curves were obtained by analyzing the test

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

results, as shown in Fig. 3.

9

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

Journal Pre-proof

Fig. 2 Triaxial Stress-strain Curves of Artificial Frozen Soil under Different Temperatures

10

al rn Jo u

q/MPa

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

Journal Pre-proof

p/MPa

11

pr

oo

f

q/MPa

Journal Pre-proof

e-

p/MPa

Pr

Fig. 3 p-q Relation Curves of Deep Artificial Frozen Soil at the Same Temperature

3

, q  1   3 )

rn

revealed the following:

 1  2 3

al

The triaxial shear test of deep artific ial frozen soil (for which p 

Jo u

1. When confining pressure is less than 7 MPa, the stress-strain curve is strain-hardening

curve. A typical characteristic of this kind of curve is the existence of yield limit. The frozen soil

stress-strain curve consists of two deformation stages, the initial elastic phase and the plastic

hardening phase. When the deviatoric stress is less than the yield limit, the frozen soil receives

less axial force, and the additional damage ins ide the soil is less. The material is in the stage of

linear elastic deformation, and the relationship between stress and strain obeys Hooke's law.

With the increase of the axial load, the deviatoric stress of the frozen soil exceeds the yield limit,

and the joint between the soil partic les and the ice crystal begins to appear in the soil, which 12

Journal Pre-proof

reduces the ability of frozen soil to resist compressive deformation. When the frozen soil enters

the stage of plastic hardening, the trend of stress increas ing with strain begins to s low down, and

the stress maintains an increasing state, and finally stabilizes.

2. When the confining pressure is greater than or equal to 7 MPa, the trend of the

oo

f

stress-strain curve develops toward the strain softening curve. Confining pressure has two

pr

oppos ite effects on the strength of frozen soil. On the one hand, with the increase of confining

e-

pressure, the defects (micro-cracks, voids, etc.) in frozen soil gradually heal, and the

Pr

cementation force, structural force, friction force and cohes ion of soil particles gradually

increase. The frozen soil is continuous ly strengthened, and the plastic properties of frozen soil

al

are enhanced. On the other hand, with the continuous increase of confining pressure, the ice in

rn

frozen soil melts continuous ly, and the weak mineral partic les are crushed continuous ly. The

Jo u

frozen soil is weakened, and the strength tends to decrease.

3. At same confining pressure, the shape of the stress-strain curve of frozen soil is similar at

different temperatures, but the initial slope of the stress-strain curve is different. The hardening

rate of the stress-strain curve is different at different temperatures. The lower the temperature is,

the faster the hardening rate of the stress-strain curve at the initial stage is. On the contrary, the

slower the hardening rate is. This is because with the decrease of temperature, the content of

unfrozen water in frozen soil decreases gradually, and the cementation between ice and soil

13

Journal Pre-proof

increases, so that the lower the temperature of soil, the greater the modulus of deformation. At

the same time, the yield limit increases with the decrease of temperature.

4. At same temperature, the initial s lope of stress-strain curve of frozen soil increases

with the increase of confining pressure, which mainly shows that the hardening rate of

oo

f

stress-strain curve is different under different confining pressure. The hardening rate of

pr

frozen soil at the initial stage of stress-strain curve increases with the increase of confining

e-

pressure. This is because confining pressure increases the compactness of soil and improves

Pr

the resistance of soil to initial compressive deformation. At the same time, the yield limit

rn

(2) Triaxial creep test

al

increases with the increase of confining pressure.

Jo u

Creep curves of artific ial frozen soil under different confining pressures and freezing

temperatures were obtained through triaxial creep test of deep artific ial frozen soil, as shown

in Fig. 4, and typical isochronous stress-strain curves of artificial frozen soil were obtained

by analyzing the creep curves, as shown in Fig. 5.

14

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

Journal Pre-proof

15

pr

oo

f

Journal Pre-proof

al rn Jo u

  MPa

Pr

e-

Fig. 4 Typical Creep Test Curves of Artificial Frozen Soil at Different Temperatures

ε1 /% Fig. 5 Isochronous Stress-strain Curves at a Freezing Temperature of -10℃

The triaxial creep test of deep artificial frozen soil revealed the following:

(1) The test curves of triaxial creep and uniaxial creep are s imilar, demonstrating the

16

Journal Pre-proof

theoretical basis of the transition from uniaxial creep to triaxial creep;

(2) We can see from the data presented above that isochronous creep curves include four

segments and represent a linear distribution at low axial pressure, showing that the

Drucker-Prager yield criterion can also be used to describe the yield of frozen soil;

oo

f

(3) The creep properties of frozen soil are c losely related to time and stress levels. In the

pr

creep tests, when the stress level is lower than the yield stress of the frozen soil, the frozen soil

e-

will experience the first and second creep stages, namely the decay and steady-state creep stage,

Pr

but no acceleration creep stage, and mainly manifested as viscoelasticity.

al

(4) During the creep tests, when the creep stress exceeds a critical value σ s ( yield stress ),

rn

the third creep stage occurs. The frozen soil w ill undergo three stages of decay, steady state and

Jo u

acceleration. The inside of the frozen soil will be damaged and gradually accumulated until the

accelerated creep of the frozen soil occurs. Acceleration creep stage lasts only for a short time

before damage occurs. Because frozen soil in deep alluvium is subjected to a significant ground

pressure and enters the third creep stage, the accelerated creep stage of frozen soil must be

considered.

(5) At the same temperature, the creep value of frozen soil increases with the increase of the value σ 1 -σ 3 , and at the same value σ 1 -σ 3 , the creep value of frozen soil decreases with the

decrease of the temperature. 17

Journal Pre-proof

(6) During tests, frozen soil shows transient elastic strain, but less than 10% creep

deformation;

The Drucker–Prager yield criterion can be used for the triaxial compress ion and creep tests

of frozen soil, providing the basis for fractional derivative model fitting.

oo

f

2.3 Validation of yield criterion for deep artificial frozen soil The measured creep yield criterion of frozen soil is described here. Tests reveal the creep

e-

al rn

Jo u

J

0.5

Pr

as presented in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

pr

strength envelope and Drucker-Prager yield criterion of deep artificial frozen soil with the results

σ m/MPa Fig. 6 Drucker-Prager Yield Criterion of Artificial Frozen Soil

18

pr

σ/MPa

oo

f

Pa

Journal Pre-proof

Fig. 7 Creep Envelope of Deep Artificial Frozen Soil

e-

Based on the data shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, the following conclusions can be obtained from

Pr

the tested pressure range: the p-q relation of frozen soil is a curve and is linear at low stress, and

al

the creep envelope of frozen soil is nearly straight. We can conclude that the transient deformation

rn

of frozen soil complies with the property of Drucker-Prager material; therefore the yield of the

Jo u

frozen soil can be approximately described using the Drucker-Prager yield criterion.

3 Fractional Derivative-Based Creep Constitutive Model of Deep Artificial Frozen Soil

3.1 The fractional derivative constitutive equation Since the traditional integral order calculus constitutive model has some limitations, fractional calculus is applied to calculate the creep of soft soil. The fractional derivative-based rheological model uses Abel theorems to replace the Newton equations in classical Nishihara theory. At the same time, in classical Nishihara model, the yield limit σ s is a one-dimensional constant,and When σ is larger than σ s, the model enters the plastic yield stage. Under the

19

Journal Pre-proof

three-dimensional stress state, the fractional derivative-based rheological model replaces σ s with a three-dimensional function group F, considering the anisotropy of the mechanical properties of the material and the changes under the influence of temperature. When the value under various factors exceeds the limit of this function, the soil sample will enter the plastic yield stage, which can more accurately describe the plasticity yield stage of frozen soil. The traditional Nishihara

e-

pr

oo

f

model is shown in Fig. 8.

Pr

Fig. 8 Traditional Nishihara Model The traditional Nishihara model consists of Hooker body (H), viscoelastic body (N/H) and

al

viscoplastic body (N/St V). In Fig 8, where E0 denotes the elastic modulus; E1 denotes the

rn

viscoelastic modulus; η1 , η2 denote the viscous coefficients of the kettle.

Jo u

The fractional derivative-based creep model is shown in Fig. 9.

Elastic stage

Elastic-visco stage

Visco-plastic stage

Fig. 9 Fractional Derivative-Based Creep Model The fractional derivative-based visco-elastic-plastic constitutive model is explained as follows:

20

Journal Pre-proof   t   E1  t   q1Dr   t  D r  x  t   

(1)

1 d t x   d  1  r  dt 0  t   r

(2)

D r f  t  can be solved by Laplace transform:





 m r L  Dr f  t   L D m  D   f  t  

oo

f

m 1   mr   mr S m L  D   f  t    S mk 1D   f  t    k 0   t 0

m 1

S r F  s    S mk 1D k mr f  0  (m – 1 < r < m, m = 1, 2, 3…)

(3)

pr

k 0

e-

wherein, s and m are the Laplace transform parameters.

Pr

In the case of m = 1, and with the initial condition set as 0,

al

 1 r L  Dr f  t   S r F  s   D   f  0   S r F  s 

rn

The constitutive equation of the fractional derivative-based Nishihara model can be solved by

Jo u

Laplace transform:

  s   E  s   q1S r   s 

(4)

wherein, q1 indicates the creep modulus of fractional derivative-based Nishihara model. Therefore, for σ1 -σ3 <σs , the constitutive equation of the fractional derivative-based Nishihara model is as follows:

 t  

1  Er  t   ,t  0 , E1 

t /   Er  t   1    1  1  rn  n 1 

wherein,

0

n

rn

21

Journal Pre-proof

Therefore:

t /      t   1    1  E1  n 1  1  rn   0 

rn



n

(5)

In the case of σ 1 -σ 3 ≥σ s , the constitutive equation of the fractional derivative-based Nishihara model is as follows:

t /     F t   t   1    1  E1  n 1  1  rn   2 0 

rn



(6)

oo

f

n

pr

3.2 Viscoelastic modulus of artificial frozen soil

The visco-elastic-plastic stress can be calculated using forward integration, and the stress

e-

increment is given by equation (7)

Pr

 i( k )  Dije (ej e( k )  eepj ( k ) )

al

Wherein:

e( k )

Jo u

rn

e j



t

1



e

E1

1

(7)

t

(8)

Therefore, the viscoelastic modulus of artificial frozen soil can be expressed as follows:

t /   Er  t   1    1  1  rn  n 1 

n

rn

(9)

3.3 Visco-elastic-plastic flexibility matrix It is assumed that the creep of frozen soil satisfies the classical theory of plastic mechanics: (1) the rheological deformation results from deviatoric stress and is not related to the hydrostatic pressure; and (2) the principal axis of stress coincides with the principal axis of strain. Thus, the

22

Journal Pre-proof

viscoplastic increment can be expressed as follows:

 m  cm em

(10)

s j  cl (elj  eepj )

(11)

wherein:

Et 1  2

cl 

Et 1 

oo

Partial derivatives of formula (10) and (11) are as follows

(12)

f

cm 

(13)

pr

 m cm  [1 1 1 0 0 0]T { } 3

(14)

Pr

e-

si el (eiep )  cl ( i  ) e j e j e j

wherein:

Jo u

rn

al

4  2  elj 1  2   e j 6 0 0  0

(ej p ) ei



2 2 0 0 0  4 2 0 0 0  2 4 0 0 0   0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0  0 0 0 0 3

t  t  F

2



F { }

(15)

(16)

According to the above tests, the Drucker–Prager yield criterion can be used to describe the creep yield of frozen soil.

F

6sin  6c cos   m  3J 2  (3  sin  ) (3  sin  )

(17)

Wherein: φ is the internal friction angle of frozen soil, in degrees; c is the cohesive force of 23

Journal Pre-proof

frozen soil, in MPa; and σ m and J 2 are the first stress tensor invariant and the second deviatoric stress tensor invariant, respectively.

F 6sin   m  3J 2   { } (3  sin  ) { } { }

 J2 1 Sx  { } 2 J 2 

Sy

2 yz

Sz

(18)

2 zx

2 xy 

T

1 1  1 [ P]   0 0  0

0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0  1 1 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0

al

Pr

e-

1 1

1 1 0

0

1 0

0

Jo u

rn

2  1   1 [ R]   0 0  0

pr

wherein: [P] and [R] are coefficient matrixes;

2

(20)

oo

f

F 6sin  [ P] 3[ R] (  ){ } { } (3  sin  ) 9 m 6 J 2

(19)

1 2

0

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

0  0  0   0  0   6 

(21)

(22)

The relationship between the deviatoric stress tensor invariant and the components of stress is as follows:

 i  si   m

i = 1, 2, 3

(23)

 i  si

i = 4, 5, 6

(24)

Therefore, the visco-elastic-plastic matrix components can be expressed as follows

24

Journal Pre-proof DijVP 

si  m  e j e j

DijVP 

Assuming a  2

t  t  F

2



si e j

i = 1, 2, 3

(25)

i = 4, 5, 6

(26)

2sin  and 3 m (3  sin  )

b2

t  t  F

2



3 , the 6 J2

components of the viscoplastic flexibility matrix can be expressed as follows: (27)

1 1 d12  d13  d 23  cm  cl  a +b 3 3

(28)

pr

oo

f

1 2 d11  d 22  d33  cm  cl  a  2b 3 3

(29)

e-

1 d 44  d55  d66  cl  6b 2

Pr

The flexibility matrix is a symmetric matrix and the remaining components are 0.

rn

of Constitutive Model

al

4 ADINA Finite Element Program-Based Secondary Development and Validation

Jo u

ADINA 8.1 version supports the secondary development of material constitutive relations, unit algorithm, element failure criterion, structure rupture criterion, crack extension rule, and boundary conditions.

4.1 Verification of fractional derivative model of artificial frozen soil FORTRAN language was used to develop the constitutive model for artificial frozen soil, and the element type, integration method, and nonlinearity of finite elements were considered.

Uniaxial and triaxial creep tests were carried out on artificial frozen clay samples under different temperatures and stresses, and regression analysis was conducted to assess the constitutive relation of artificial frozen soil under complex stress. The rheological parameters (as

25

Journal Pre-proof

shown in Table 3) were obtained by uniaxial creep test on deep artificial frozen soil using cylindrical samples with a diameter of 50 mm and height of 100 mm.

Table 3 Parameters for the Numerical Calculation of the Fractional Derivative Model of Deep Artificial Frozen Soil

Test

E0

E1

η1

η2

c

φ

μ MPa

MPa

MPa·min

-5℃

76

0.26

140

2358

-10℃

138

0.22

250

3250

-15℃

204

0.18

375

4670

10 MPa·min

MPa

°

oo

f

Temperature

m 3

1.5

5.48

1.4

5856

3.1

6.08

1.4

8750

4.8

6.68

1.4

e-

pr

3762

rn Jo u

 

al

Pr

The creep curves obtained by numerical simulation are shown in Fig. 10.

Time/h Fig. 10 ADINA-Simulated Triaxial Creep Test Curves of Cylindrical Samples

26

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

1 /%

e-

pr

Time/h

oo

f

1 /%

Journal Pre-proof

Time/h

27

Time/h

oo

f

1 /%

Journal Pre-proof

Jo u

rn

al

 %

Pr

e-

pr

Fig. 11 Measured and Simulated Triaxial Creep Test Curves for Cylindrical Samples

Time/h Fig. 12 Error between Triaxial Creep Test and Simulation versus Time As can be seen from the data presented in Fig. 11 and 12, the values obtained from the triaxial compression creep test and the simulation changed similarity, with error within 0.15%, further demonstrating that the fractional derivative-based creep model can accurately describe the constitutive relation of frozen soil under high stress. The fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model was added and the ADINA material library was expanded with the powerful secondary development platform of ADINA. The uniaxial and triaxial compression creep test results show that this model can accurately describe creep under high ground pressure. 28

Journal Pre-proof

(1) Under a low constant force, frozen oil experiences both unstable and stable creep, i.e., the first and second creep stages, and the theoretical value agrees well with the measured value. (2) When the creep stress exceeds the critical value σ s , the third creep stage occurs, but lasts only for a short time before damage occurs. Because frozen soil in deep alluvium withstands significant ground pressure and enters the third creep stage, the accelerated creep stage of frozen

f

soil must be considered. According to the test results, there are differences between the values

oo

obtained from theoretical calculation and tests early in the accelerated creep stage, but these

pr

values are consistent in the damage stage.

e-

Therefore, it is feasible to use this fractional derivative-based creep constitutive model for

Pr

theoretical calculations of frozen soil under high stress such as deep alluvium and foundation of high-rise buildings.

rn

al

4.2 Numerical simulation of frozen curtain by artificial freezing method For the excavation of a coal mine with the artificial ground freezing method, the freezing

Jo u

depth is 500 m, and it freezes with three circles of freezing tubes. The net diameter of the shaft is 6 m, and the designed thickness of the frozen wall is 9 m. Considering the axial symmetry of the cylindrical frozen wall, one-fourth of the physical model is simulated, as shown in Fig. 13. In the calculated physical model, the upper surface is set as the force boundary, bearing the dead weight of the overlying topsoil, its value is 6 MPa; the right boundary is set the lateral pressure calculated by the theoretical formula of heavy liquid, its value is 4 MPa; and the front and rear boundaries are symmetric boundaries with constrained tangential displacement in the circumference direction; the temperature of frozen wall is -15 ℃, and the excavation height is 20 m. To verify the calculated results, a measured displacement site was set at 0.8 m depth from top to bottom. The main 29

Journal Pre-proof

oo

f

freezing technical parameters of the construction are shown in Table 4.

pr

Fig. 13 Calculation Model for Shaft Excavation

e-

Table 4 Main freezing technical parameters

Pr

Item

al

Freezing depth (m)

500 6

rn

Net diameter of the shaft (m)

Parameter

9

Jo u

Freezing wall thickness (m) Average temperature (℃)

-15

Number of freezing holes

40

Circulation temperature of freezing brine (℃)

-26~-28

Temperature of side wall (℃)

-6~-8

The distribution rule of the sidewall displacement with the depth is obtained by the numerical simulation, as shown in Fig. 14. As shown in the graph, for the radial creep displacement of the frozen wall in the exposed section at a section height and different exposure time, the displacement at the middle and lower parts are higher than the displacement at the upper part, and

30

Journal Pre-proof

the curves form the shape of a fish belly.

e-

pr

oo

f

Depth/m

Displacement/mm

Pr

Fig. 14 Distribution Rule of Sidewall Displacement with Depth Constrained by the construction status and conditions, it is usually impossible to obtain all

al

the necessary displacement data of the sidewall of the frozen curtain. The measuring points at the

rn

sidewall can be arranged only after they are excavated. In addition, the measurement may often be

Jo u

limited by construction conditions. For instance, a concrete wall may be built after a working of the section height of the shaft is finished, and the displacement measuring must be stopped. Therefore, to evaluate the difference between the measured displacement of the sidewall of the frozen curtain and the actual displacement of the frozen curtain, the measured results and ADINA-based numerical simulation data were compared and analyzed, as shown in Fig. 15.

31

Time/h

oo

f

Displacement/mm

Journal Pre-proof

pr

Fig. 15 Comparison of Sidewall Displacement Measured at Measuring Points and Obtained

e-

from Numerical Simulation

Pr

Fig. 15 presents the comparison of the measured displacement data of the frozen curtain of

al

the sidewall at 0.8 m from the top to bottom and the numerical simulation calculations of the

rn

corresponding points during shaft excavation. It can be seen from the graph that, at the instant of

Jo u

excavation of the section height, the lower measuring points of the displacement working face experience advanced displacement (approximately 3.5 mm). With the excavation of the working face, there is a gradual increase in the displacement of the measuring points, and the displacement of the sidewall reaches 22 mm when the measuring point is exposed. At this time, the measuring point was established 8 h after the excavation of the section height. The comparison of the measured displacement curves and numerical simulation curves shows that these curves are similar in shape. Limited by the supporting work, it is impossible to obtain all the displacement data of the excavated section height by measurement. A comparison of measured data and maximum numerical simulation data shows that the measured data only accounts for 16/53 of the

32

Journal Pre-proof

actual values under the engineering conditions, approximately 30%.

Based on the numerical simulation results, the displacement of the floor heave of the working

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

face is shown in Fig. 16.

Jo u

Fig. 16 Distribution Rule of Working Face Displacement with Shaft Center The displacement of the floor heave of the working face of shaft has the following distinct features: 1. The displacement curve is a curve of more than cubic power, and is inflected near the sidewall. 2. The maximum displacement occurs at the center of shaft. 3. The displacement is one-fourth times larger than that of the sidewall. 4. The deformation of the floor heave is the main contributor of the advanced displacement of the frozen wall below the working face. 5. The deformation of the floor heave increases with the increase in the excavated section height and the extension of the excavation time.

After the excavation of the section height for 4 h, significant displacement takes place at the

33

Journal Pre-proof

floor heave of the working face of the shaft, reaching 22 mm and above. As the working face is excavated deeper and deeper, the displacement of the floor heave gradually increases to reach a maximum of 32 mm after 8 h and 47 mm after 12 h. When the entire section height is accomplished, the maximum displacement of the floor heave is 66 mm. A comparison of the measured displacement of the floor heave of the excavated working face and the simulated values

f

was performed and is shown in Table 5.

Working Face

oo

Table 5 Comparison of the Displacement of the Sidewall of the Frozen Curtain and the

pr

Numerical Simulation Numerical Simulation Calculation Method

Pr

Maximum Displacement of

24.5

al

Sidewall/mm Maximum Uplift Displacement

(16 h)

Measurement (8 h)

49.8

16

66

21

e-

(8 h)

Field

rn

32

Jo u

of Working Face/mm

We can see from Table 5, because the displacement of the floor heave of the working face can only be measured at the excavated section height and in the supporting process, there are limited field measurements of the displacement. Only 8 h were available for the measurement, and the maximum displacement occurred at the center of the shaft, at approximately 21.0 mm. The maximum displacement determined from numerical simulation is 32 mm in 8 h. Therefore, the measured value is only 60% of the simulated value.

5 Conclusions A self-developed W3Z-200 testing system was used for triaxial compression and creep tests

34

Journal Pre-proof

on frozen soil, and the test results were analyzed. Linear Newton equations in the Nishihara model were replaced with nonlinear Newton equations, and a linear spring was replaced with a Drucker-Prager yield function. In this manner, the Nishihara model was improved, resulting in the fractional derivative-based

creep

constitutive model for

artificial frozen

soil under

three-dimensional stress. In addition, the flexibility matrix of application and numerical

f

calculation was derived with the Drucker-Prager yield criterion. The fractional derivative

oo

constitutive model of artificial frozen soil requires few parameters and simple calculations .

pr

(1) When stress is low, deep artificial frozen soil shows a stable creep. When σ1 -σ3 >σs , the

e-

soil shows non-decaying creep for a short time before the damage occurs, indicating that the

Pr

fractional derivative constitutive model is suitable to describe the creep of the frozen soil. (2) The constitutive model is added into a large nonlinear program ADINA by secondary

al

development of a finite element program, and uniaxial and triaxial creeps of frozen soil were

rn

tested and simulated. The results show some errors between the stress-strain curves and measured

Jo u

curves of frozen soil before the stress reaches its limits, and the theoretical values coincide with the measured values in the final creep stage at maximum stress, demonstrating that this model can describe the overall non-decaying creep process of the frozen soil under high stress. (3) This model can be used for the mechanical analys is of a frozen curtain in a deep mine. The maximum displacement of the sidewall of the frozen curtain obtained from the numerical simulation within 16 h was 48.9 mm, while the measured maximum displacement is 16.8 mm at the same section height. The floor heave of the working face was distributed as measured on field, and is especially large near the center of the shaft with an ADINA-based simulated value of 66.0 mm. The floor heave measured on site was 40.0 mm, 60% of the simulated value.

35

Journal Pre-proof

Acknowledgements This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41672278, No. 41271071, No. 41977236, and No. 51504070), the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation Projects (Grant No. 2017Y4001), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation Projects (Grant No. 20192ACBL20002), and the State Key Laboratory Program of

pr

oo

f

Frozen Soil Engineering (Grant No. SKLFSE201204), we gratefully acknowledge these supports.

References:

e-

Andersland, O. and Akili, W., 1967. Stress effect on creep rates of a frozen clay soil. Geotechnique, 17(1): 27-39.

Pr

Arenson, L.U., Springman, S.M. and Sego, D.C., 2006. The rheology of fro zen soils. Applied Rheology, 17(1): 12147.

Changqing, Z., Tiande, M., Jiacheng, W., Lina, M. and Yafeng, L., 1995. An Analysis on Creep Loess by Electronmicroscope. JOURNA L OF GLACIOLOGY AND

GEOCRYOLOGY, 17(S): 54-59.

al

Damage of Fro zen

rn

Changqing, Z., Xuexia, W. and Tiande, M., 1995. Microstructure Damage Behaviour and Change Characteristics in the Frozen Soil Creep Process. JOURNA L OF GLA CIOLOGY AND GEOCRYOLOGY, 17(S1): 60-65.

Jo u

Christ, M., Kim, Y. and Park, J., 2009. The influence of temperature and cycle s on acoustic and mechanical properties of frozen soils. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(3): 153-159. Dong, L., Zhang, G., Zhao, S. and Pan, W., 2014. Experimental study of the creep indexes of frozen soil. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 36(1): 130-136. Enelund, M., Mahler, L., Runesson, K. and Josefson, BL., 1999. Formu lation and integration of the standard linear viscoelastic solid with fractional o rder rate laws. International Journal of Solids And Structuresv, 36(16):2417– 2442. Ghoreishian Amiri, S., Grimstad, G., Kad ivar, M. and Nordal, S., 2016. Constitutive model for rate-independent behavior of saturated frozen soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(10): 1646-1657. Hyder Ali Muttaqi Shah, S., Qi, H., 2010. Starting solutions for a vis coelastic flu id with fractional burgers’ model in an annular pipe. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11(1):547–554. Lai, Y., Jin, L. and Chang, X., 2009. Yield criterion and elasto -plastic damage constitutive model for frozen sandy soil. International journal of plasticity, 25(6): 1177-1205. Lai, Y., Yang, Y., Chang, X. and Li, S., 2010. Strength criterion and elastoplastic constitutive model of frozen silt in generalized plastic mechanics. International Journal of Plasticity, 26(10): 1461-1484. Li, D., Fan, J. and Wang, R., 2011. Research on visco-elastic-plastic creep model of artificially frozen 36

Journal Pre-proof soil under high confining pressures. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 65(2): 219-225. Li, D., Yang, X. and Chen, J., 2017. A study of triaxial creep test and yield criterion of artificial frozen soil under unloading stress paths. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 141: 163-170. Liao, M., Lai, Y., Liu, E. and Wan, X., 2017. A fractional order creep constitutive model of warm frozen silt. Acta Geotechnica, 12(2): 377-389. Libertiau x, V., Pascon, F., 2010. Differential versus integral formu lation of fractional hyperviscoelastic constitutive laws for brain tissue modelling. Journal of Co mputational and Applied Mathematics; 234(7):2029–2035. Liu, E., Lai, Y., Wong, H. and Feng, J., 2018. An elastoplastic model for saturated freezing soils based on thermo-poromechanics. International Journal of Plasticity, 107: 246-285. Loria, A.R., Frigo, B. and Chiaia, B., 2017. A non -linear constitutive model for describing the mechanical behaviour of frozen g round and permafrost. Co ld regions science and technology, 133:

f

63-69.

oo

Ma, W., Wu, Z.W. and Sheng, Y., 1994. Creep and creep strength of fro zen soil. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 16(2): 113-118. frozen soil. Science in China(Series B)(03): 309-317.

pr

Tiande, M., Xuexia, W. and Changqing, Z., 1995. M icrostructure damage theory of creep process in Vyalov, S.S., 2013. Rheological fundamentals of soil mechanics. Elsevier.

e-

Yao, X., Qi, J., Zhang, J. and Yu, F., 2018. A one-dimensional creep model for frozen soils taking temperature as an independent variable. Soils and foundations, 58(3): 627-640.

Pr

Zhao, L., Yang, P., Wang, J. and Zhang, L., 2014. Cyclic direct shear behaviors of frozen soil– structure interface under constant normal stiffness condition. Co ld Regions Science and Technology, 102: 52-62.

al

Zhao, L., Yang, P., Wang, J. and Zhang, L., 2014. Impacts of surface roughness and loading conditions on cyclic direct shear behaviors of an artificial fro zen silt–structure interface. Cold Reg ions Science

rn

and Technology, 106: 183-193.

Zhao, L., Yang, P., Zhang, L. and Wang, J., 2017. Cyclic d irect shear behaviors of an artificial frozen

Jo u

soil-structure interface under constant normal stress and sub -zero temperature. Co ld Regions Science and Technology, 133: 70-81.

Zhou, Z. et al., 2016. Multiaxial creep of frozen loess. Mechanics of Materials, 95: 172-191. Цытович, Н.А., 1985. Frozen soil mechanics. Science press, Beijing. Zhou, H.W., Wang, C.P., Han, B.B., and Duan, Z.Q., 2011 A creep constitutive model for salt rock based on fractional derivatives. International Journal Of Rock Mechanics And Mining Sciences, 48(1):116–121.

37

Journal Pre-proof

The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

Dongwei Li, Chaochao Zhang, Guosheng Ding, Hua Zhang, Junhao Chen, Hao Cui, Wangsheng Pei, Shengfu Wang, Lingshi An, Peng Li, Chang Yuan

38

Journal Pre-proof

Highlights 1, A fractional derivative constitutive model of deep artificial frozen soil was established; 2, Nonlinear Newton equations were used to consider the physical and mechanical properties of frozen soil; 3, The fractional derivative constitutive model can be used to describe frozen soil under high

Jo u

rn

al

Pr

e-

pr

oo

f

confining pressures.

39