Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
FRUCTOSE-1,6-DIPHOSPHATASE OF ACINETOBACTER : INHIBITION
BY
ATP AND CITRATE Antony Department
J. Mukkada and Emily
J. Bell
of Biological Sciences and the Graduate of M icrobiology, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
Division
Received August 20, 1969 Summary Fructose-1,6-diphosphatase (FDPase) from a species of Acinetobacter was partially purified and some of its properties studied. The enzyme resembles other FDPases investigated in its dependence on a divalent metal like Mg++ or Mn++, high affinity for the substrate, stimulation by EDTA and inhibition from by high substrate concentrations. However, it differs most other FDPases in its insensitivity to AMP and inhibition by ATP and citrate. Introduction Fructose-1,6-diphosphatase phosphohydrolase, strongly 1965).
EC 3.1.3.11)
inhibited However,
Taketa
and Pogell
inactivation
enzyme in Candida utilis they
contaminant.
attributed In the slime
fructose-1,6-diphosphatase AMP or dAMP (Rosen, the presence negative
9957, reclassified
that
ATP
of the enzyme from rabbit
by high
some inhibition
of the
concentrations
to the traces
of ATP and
of AMP present
mold Polvsphondvlium is not appreciably In this
Acinetobacter
sp.
as Acinetobacter
1968) which
is
by ATP (Atkinson,
is strongly 340
as a
pallidum, inhibited
communication
of a fructose-1,6-diphosphatase
bacterium
and Stanier,
1966).
l-
of sources
(1963) reported
(1965) noted
Rosen, -et al.
ADP which
from a variety
by AMP and activated
causes a reversible liver.
(D-fructose-1,6-diphosphate
by
we report
in the gram
(Mima polymorpha
ATCC
by Baumann, Doudoroff inhibited
--in vitro
by ATP
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
and to a lesser
extent
by citrate
while
being
relatively
unaffected
by AMP. Materials The organism
and Methods
was grown on a simple
described
earlier
(Bell
harvested
at the m iddle
and Yarus,
1966).
The enzyme was partially
by lactic
fractionation,
precipitation through
purified
according
(1966) by measuring
nicotinamide
adenine
temperature
at 340 mp.
ammonium sulfate
(2.0 mg/ml)
the rate phosphate
The standard
M;
reaction
0.2 M , pH 9.5;
was adjusted
diluted
12 m inutes.
to 3.0 m l with
amount which
water.
The specific
converts
to fructose-6-phosphate was determined
Fructose-1,6-diphosphate
contained:
MgC12, 0.1 M ;
volume
was initiated after
were measured between 6 and of the enzyme is expressed
protein.
A unit
1 m icromole
of enzyme is the
of fructose-1,6-diphosphate
in 1 m inute
at room temperature.
by the method of Lowry,
glucose-6-phosphate
(5.0 mg/ml);
The final
The reaction
activity
(98%
isomerase
0.01 M ; and 0.1 m l
(fructose-1,6-diphosphate)
and maximum rates
per m illigram
m ixture
dehydrogenase
enzyme preparation.
the substrate
equilibration
sample absorbance
0.03 m l
0.06 m l sodium fructose-1,6-diphosphate,
of
(NADP) at room
0.003 m l each of phosphohexose
and glucose-6-phosphate
of a suitably
fraction
of reduction
model 2000 multiple
buffer,
0.03 m l NADP, 0.05
isomerase,
(40 fold)
to the method of Rosen, Rosen
dinucleotide
in a Gilford
0.60 m l glycine
Protein
in the
The enzyme was assayed
and Horecker
as units
were
and passage of the 80% ammonium sulfate
spectrophotometrically
by adding
medium
The cells
subsequent
a Sephadex G-25 column.
recorder
salts
of the log phase and ruptured
French Press. acid
m ineral
pure),
(1951).
NADP, phosphohexose
dehydrogenase, 341
et al. --
AMP, ADP, ATP,
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
EDTA and citrate St.
Louis.
were purchased
Before
addition
ATP, EDTA and citrate
to the assay system,
Growth on various acetate,
not affect stitutive
succinate
Like
also
stimulated
of the enzyme,
different
requires
inhibited response
at high
The curves
cant
decrease
takes
results.
about
inhibitor
ATP and citrate
observed
it
five
about
fold,
results
ATP, ADP,
2.0 pmoles
40-50% reduction to give
ATP although
organisms
it
is
(in
comparable less
(Atkinson,
effective. is a potent
1965).
to bind Mg++ which
the concentration
to determine
Since is essential
whether
the
of Mg++ or are It
was observed
of Mg++ in the reaction
of the enzyme could 342
a 3.0
in activity,
to AMP which
on the enzyme itself.
the activity
the addition in a signifi-
are due to the complexing
effect
by increasing
m ixture
While
was necessary
inhibitions
due to a direct that
1 and 2 show that
have the capacity
the reaction,
like
the
different.
insensitive
in most other
is at
However,
modifiers
5-7 pmoles of citrate
Our enzyme is relatively
(Mg++ or Mn?,
concentrations.
causes nearly
ADP resembles
0.009-0.013.
at 0.1 - 0.2 m M of FDP), but
to the assay m ixtures
m l assay m ixture)
of the
the enzyme from our
cation
of activities
in activity.
is con-
of EDTA and is active
marked A in Figs.
of ATP or citrate
it
activity
sources,
a divalent
is quite
ethyl - does
that
is about
of the enzyme to allosteric
AMP, and citrate
for
substrates
substrate
lactate,
suggesting
The specific
by low concentrations
low (maximum rates
- pyruvate,
and fructose-1,6-diphosphate
the FDPases from most other
organism
it
sources
the organism.
enzyme in these
AMP, ADP,
and Discussion
carbon
the level for
Co.,
were neutralized. Results
alcohol,
from Sigma Chemical
be restored
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
gmoles
ATP 5 1
1
I
I
4
2
OI 01 0,
I
6 Time
7 I
6 1
8 (mln)
IO
20
30
of FDPase by ATP. The enzyme was assayed Figure 1. Inhibition Curve A shows spectraphotometrically as described in the text. the effect of increasing concentrations of ATP while curve B shows the effect of preincubating the enzyme with ATP (2.0 pmoles/3.0 m l assay m ixture) for different periods of time. Concentrations of ATP shown represent the amounts in 3.0 m l assay m ixtures. 8 I
umoles I2 I
Citrate 16 I
20 I
24 I
26 I
I
80
20
I
1
I
2
4
I
I
6 Time
0 tminl
The enzyme was of FDPase by citrate. Figure 2. Inhibition Curve assayed spectrophotometrically as described in the text. A shows the effect of increasing concentrations of citrate while curve B shows the &fect of preincubating the enzyme with citrate (5.0 pmoles/3.0 m l assay m ixture) for different lengths Concentrations of citrate shown represent. the amounts of time. in 3.0 m l assay m ixtures. 343
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
to 90% of the control
which
suggested
that
Mg++ may be the cause of the inhibitory Subsequent
experiments
preincubation citrate
(Table
cantly
greater
measurements
degrees
the same.
Table
or citrate
addition
30 m inutes,
30 m inutes
results
than those
immediately
after
1 also
shows that
in signifiobtained
adding
the effect
to the enzyme preincubated
is essentially
same as without
the
ATP or
of ATP and Citrate
Assayed immediately
Mg++ for
prior
Relative after
addition
with
MgCl2 for
Preincubated
with
ATP for after
Preincubated
with
MgC12
Preincubated
with
citrate
ATP
incubation
on FDPase actiyity
Preincubated
Assayed immediately
case are
of either with
when
1
Treatment
Assays upper while on the
m l) or
the amounts of magnesium in either
Table Effect
showed that
ATP (2.0 pmoles/3.0
of inhibition
are initiated
although
citrate,
for
ml)
of
effects.
11, however,
of the enzyme with
(5.0 pales/3.0
the complexing
30 m ins.
activity (%I 47.1 43.0
30 m ins.
11.9
addition
50.0
for
30 m ins. for
30 m ins.
48.4 14.1
The were run at alkaiine pH as described in the text. half of the Table shows the effect of 2.0 pmoles of ATP the lower half shows the effec,t of 5.6 pmoles' of citrate relative activity of the enzyme. 344
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of the enzyme with assays
the cation.
It
the amounts of magnesium,
in each case and the time citrate
is the same.
may be noted that
ATP and citrate
of exposure
Mg++ to the reaction
distinct
before
inhibitory
by the results
incubated
with
effect
overnight
to remove free
the usual
manner using
enzyme as a control.
for
inhibitory
of
in which
these
was dialyzed
and then assayed
was found that
in
sample of
the ATP and citrate
activity
the control
of
the enzyme
but dialyzed
enzymes showed a residual
9.0% respectively
that
the
on the enzyme which
ATP and citrate
It
the addition
30 m inutes
an untreated
if
This was further
of experiments
ATP or citrate
noted
indicates
from Mg++ complexing.
confirmed
treated
of magnesium to ATP or
clearly
m ixture,
compounds have a direct is quite
are constant
The very marked inhibition
enzyme is exposed to ATP or citrate
in all
clearly
of about 6.0 and demonstrating
the
of these compounds on the enzyme protein
effects
itself. The inhibition time
by ATP and citrate
of incubation
Figs.
with
1 and 2 show the
the enzyme. effect
the absence of Mg++) with varying
periods
The curves
of incubating
ATP and citrate
prior
ted.
substrate
would give
for
in assays
of titrate/3.0
phenomenon is clearly
of any structural
relationships
(fructose-1,6-diphosphate) suggests
which,
40-50% inhibition
m l and 5.0 pmoles
dependence of this
(ATP and citrate)
respectively
In these experi-
incubation,
The lack
the enzyme (in
of assay in each case.
(2.0 pmoles of ATP/3.0 The time
marked B in
Magnesium was
ments we used an amount of the inhibitors without
upon the
up to 30 m inutes.
of time
added at the time
is dependent
that 345
m l).
demonstrabetween the
and the inhibitors these
interact
with
the enzyme
Vol. 37, No. 2, 1969
at
an
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
allosteric
site
to determine
sites.
or
the nature
As in Escherichia
Studies
of these
coli
(Fraenkel,
et al., --
in our organism
the insensitivity
to AMP and susceptibility
make the FDPase of
The physiological to note that
significance
inhibition
the catabolic
is also
of Acinetobacter
1966) the fructose-
constitutive.
Acinetobacter
quite
is not clear.
It
by ATP and citrate
anabolic
FDPase.
It
has both a catabolic
However,
to ATP and citrate distinctive. is
interesting
is characteristic
enzyme phosphofructokinase
not of the usually
directed
sites.
1,6-diphosphatase
inhibition
are being
(Atkinson,
1965) and
may be that
the FDPase
and anabolic
role.
Acknowledgment This work was supported Research Grant Allergy
AI-08050
by U.S.
Public
Health
from the National
and Infectious
Institute
Service of
Diseases. References
Atkinson,
D.E.,
150, 851 (1965).
Science,
Baumann, P., Doudoroff, 2, 1520 (1968). Bell,
E.J.
and Marus,
and Stanier,
R.Y.,
J. Bacterial.,
91,
M.
A.,
Fraenkel, D.G., Pontremoli, Biochem. Biophys., 114,
S. and Horecker, 4 (1966).
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265 (1951).
A.L.
B.L.,
Rosen, O.M.,
114,
Biochem.
Biophys.,
J. Bacterial., 2223 (1966). B.L.,
Arch.
and Randall,
Rosen, O.M., Rosen, S.M. and Horecker, Biophys. 112, 411 (1965). Arch.
Arch.
R.J.,
Biochem.
31 (1966).
Rosen, O.M., Rosen, S.M. and Horecker, B.L., in Methods -in Enzymology IJ, W.A. Wood, ed., Academic Press, New York, 1966, p. 632. Taketa, K. and Pogell, 12, 229 (1963).
B.,
Biochem. 346
of
Biophys.
Res. Commun.,