Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Journal Pre-proofs Full length article Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum ...

523KB Sizes 0 Downloads 38 Views

Journal Pre-proofs Full length article Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) Lynda Kheloul, Sylvia Anton, Christophe Gadenne, Abdellah Kellouche PII: DOI: Reference:

S1226-8615(19)30737-X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.02.008 ASPEN 1516

To appear in:

Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

13 November 2019 23 January 2020 14 February 2020

Please cite this article as: L. Kheloul, S. Anton, C. Gadenne, A. Kellouche, Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.02.008

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korean Society of Applied Entomology.

1

Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula spica essential oil and

2

linalool on different life stages of Tribolium confusum

3

(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

4

Lynda Kheloula, Sylvia Antonb, Christophe Gadenneb, Abdellah Kellouchea

5

a

6

des variations climatiques. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences

7

agronomiques, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-Ouzou 15000, Algeria

8

[email protected]; [email protected]

9

b

Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence

UMR IGEPP INRAE/Agrocampus Ouest/Université Rennes 1, Agrocampus Ouest,

10

49054 Angers cedex 01, France

11

[email protected]; [email protected]

12

Correspondence

to

be

sent

to :

13

INRA/AgrocampusOuest/Université Rennes 1, AgrocampusOuest, 2, rue Le Nôtre, 49054

14

Angers cedex 01, France. email : [email protected]

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1

Sylvia

Anton,

UMR

IGEPP

24

Abstract

25

The confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum, is a common and severe pest of stored

26

products. Here, using fumigation tests during four different exposure times, we evaluated the

27

toxicity of different doses of essential oil of spike lavender, Lavandula spica and one of its

28

major constituents, linalool, on different life stages of T. confusum under laboratory

29

conditions. The toxicity of the L. spica oil and linalool varied as a function of the

30

developmental stage and treatment duration. Young larvae (L1) were the most susceptible to

31

toxic effects, with LC50 = 19.535μl/L of air for L. spica oil and LC50 =14.198 μl/L of air for

32

linalool after 24h of exposure, whereas older larvae (L8) were affected only very little by

33

fumigation. Linalool caused higher egg mortality than L. spica oil at equivalent doses, but

34

lower mortality in pupae and adults. Emergence of intact adult insects from surviving eggs,

35

larvae and pupae was further reduced as a function of dose and exposure time to both L.

36

spica oil and linalool compared to control-treated insects. Our results show that L. spica oil

37

and linalool might be suitable for biological control of T. confusum, but tests at a larger scale

38

are necessary to confirm our results.

39 40

Keywords: Tribolium confusum; Lavandula spica; essential oil; linalool; fumigation; toxicity.

41 42 43

2

44

Introduction

45

Insects pests are the main cause of post-harvest losses because they depreciate food in

46

storage and are able to destroy a whole stock in a very short period of time (Ngamo and

47

Hance, 2007).. In in traditional maize storage systems in Togo, for example, insects accounted

48

for 80-90% of losses (Pantenius, 1988). Among pests of stored products, Tribolium confusum

49

(du Val) is one of the major insect pests of cereals and derivatives, infesting particularly mills,

50

silos and other storage facilities. This beetle causes considerable damage both at the larval and

51

adult stages by feeding on and contaminating food with their faeces, exuviae, dead insects and

52

the strong noxious odour they produce (Timothy, 2009), leading to a serious loss of market

53

value (Trematerra et al., 2011).

54

The techniques used currently to control stored-product pests rely largely on the use of

55

synthetic insecticides, such as phosphine and sulfuryl fluoride applied by fumigation (Lienard

56

and Seck, 1994 ; Arthur, 1996; Campbell et al ; 2010). However, chemical control causes

57

numerous problems such as toxicity for vertebrates including humans, environmental

58

pollution, high costs and the development of insect resistance (Arthur, 1996; Gueye et al.,

59

2011). The resistance of insects to synthetic pesticides is one of the main problems of frequent

60

application of these products. In Brazil, for example, populations of Tribolium castaneum

61

(Herbst) have shown a high degree of tolerance to phosphine, explained by the ability of these

62

insects to reduce their breathing rate (Pimentel et al., 2008). Because of, the development of

63

resistances and efforts to reduce environmental pollution, there is an urgent need to find

64

natural and sound alternative protection strategies to reduce the application of synthetic

65

insecticides. Plant essential oils are among the most promising alternatives to chemical

66

insecticides. Essential oils are complex natural mixtures of volatile organic compounds

67

produced as secondary metabolites in plants, which are constituted by terpenes, terpenoids

68

and phenol-derived aromatic components and aliphatic components (Bakkali et al., 2008).

3

69

They have been reported to have toxic, repellent, antifeedant, antibacterial, antifungal,

70

reproduction and growth inhibitory effects against insect pests (Regnault-Roger et al., 2012;

71

Ebadollahi and Jalali Sendi, 2015; Tu et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2019). In most cases, active

72

compounds of essential oils have low toxicity for vertebrates and short environmental

73

persistence, which makes them good candidates for eco-friendly insect management

74

(Regnault-Roger et al., 2012). A variety of essential oils has been examined for their

75

efficiency to control stored product pests with largely varying results, depending on the type

76

of essential oil and the insect species (e.g. Kellouche and Soltani, 2004; Stamopoulos et al.,

77

2007; Kellouche et al., 2010; Haouas et al., 2012; Regnault-Roger et al., 2012).

78

Spike lavender, Lavandula spica, is an aromatic plant of the Lamiaceae family largely

79

cultivated in the Mediterranean area (Muñoz-Bertomeu et al., 2007) and its main constituent,

80

linalool has been shown to be a potential alternative to synthetic insecticides against stored-

81

product pests such as Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) and Rhyzopertha dominica

82

(Fabricius) (Davoudi et al., 2011). However, the effects of L. spica essential oil on the

83

different developmental stages of T. confusum, have only partially been investigated so far

84

and information on the efficiency of linalool against T. confusum is limited (Stamopoulos et

85

al., 2007; Saglam and Özder, 2013).

86

The aim of the current study was to evaluate fumigant toxicity of L. spica essential oil

87

and its main component, linalool, against eggs, young larvae, (L1) old larvae (L8), pupae and

88

adults of T. confusum under laboratory conditions.

89 90

Materials and methods

91

Insect rearing

4

92

The original strain was collected from a mill in the region of Azazga (Tizi-Ouzou,

93

Algeria) and has been maintained in our laboratory (Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde

94

des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Faculté des

95

Sciences Biologiques et des Sciences Agronomiques, Université Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi-

96

Ouzou 15000, Algeria) since 2014. Eggs and young larvae of T. confusum were obtained from

97

cultures reared on a diet of wheat flour inside a dark incubator set at 30 ± 2° C and 70 ± 5 %

98

RH (Haouas et al., 2012). The old larvae, pupae and adults were taken from cultures reared on

99

a diet of medium-grain semolina under the same conditions.

100

For bioassays, we used 24 h-old eggs, one to two days-old young larvae (1st larval

101

instar: L1), 27 day-old larvae (8th larval instar: L8), one to three days-old pupae and adults

102

aged between one and seven days. All experiments were carried out under the same

103

conditions as the rearing.

104 105

Life cycle of T. confusum on semolina substrate

106

In order to follow the effects of fumigation on defined developmental stages, we recorded

107

in detail the life cycle of T. confusum on medium-grain semolina substrate under the same

108

laboratory conditions as the insect rearing. Adults were introduced in wheat flour for

109

oviposition and were removed after 24 h. The flour was then sifted with a 250 μm mesh sieve

110

to collect the eggs. Larvae started to hatch between 4 and 7 days later and we followed the

111

development of an homogeneous group of 60 L1 larvae, hatched after 4 days of egg

112

incubation. Each L1 larva was transferred into a small petri dish containing 0.5 g of medium-

113

grain semolina and the development was followed daily. At the L4 instar, larvae were

114

transferred into a new dish with 0.5 g of medium-grain semolina and the development was

115

further observed daily. Moulting was noted for each change of larval instar and the pupae and

116

exuviae were removed. 5

117 118

Essential oil and compound

119

The essential oil of L. spica flowers from Spain was purchased from the French

120

laboratory Phytosun Arôms (Laboratoires Omega Pharma, Chatillon, France). Previous

121

chemical analysis of the same oil used in the present study revealed linalool (43.79%),

122

eucalyptol (31.80%) and camphor (11.98%) as major constituents (Kheloul et al., 2019).

123

Linalool of 97% purity was provided by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France).

124 125

Fumigation tests

126

Fumigation tests were done in 64 ml Plexiglas containers with screw caps. A filter paper

127

disk (2 cm diameter, Whatman No 1) was fixed to the inner side of the screw cap with a

128

cotton thread and impregnated with a defined amount of pure essential oil, and the

129

corresponding doses per volume of air were calculated. Twenty individuals of each

130

developmental stage were introduced into a container without substrate for eggs and pupae,

131

with 0.1 g of semolina for L1 larvae and with 3 g of semolina for L8 larvae and adults. Eggs

132

and L1 larvae were deposited on a small lid (3 cm diameter, 1 cm high) inside the container

133

and the other stages were directly deposited into the container.

134

For young larvae the following doses were applied: 7.81, 15.63, 31.25 and 62.5 μl/L of

135

air. For all other stages, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 or 1000 μl/L of air doses were applied, and

136

containers without essential oil application served as controls. Five replicates were performed

137

for each dose including controls. Mortality was recorded after 24, 48, 72 or 96 h exposure

138

periods.

139

Twenty-four hours after the end of the exposure period, the number of dead insects was

140

determined for larvae and adults. Larvae and adults were considered dead if no movement of 6

141

antennae and legs were observed under a stereomicroscope. The number of larvae hatched

142

from eggs, and of adults hatched from pupae were determined 7 days after treatment. All non-

143

hatched eggs and pupae were considered dead. The observed mortality was corrected only for

144

the egg stage, taking the mortality in control experiments into account, using Abbott’s

145

correction formula (Abott, 1925). For the other life stages there was no mortality in the

146

control experiments.

147

The larval development of surviving eggs and the development of surviving treated

148

larvae were followed up until adult emergence, and the percentage of adults emerging from

149

surviving individuals of each treated developmental stage was calculated. For treated pupae,

150

the percentage of intact (undamaged) adults emerging was determined, because pupal

151

treatment elicited malformations and also mosaics (adultoids) in some surviving pupae,

152

depending on the dose of the treatment and exposure time. However these malformed insects

153

did not survive more than 48 h.

154

Another experiment was designed to assess the median lethal concentration (LC50) after

155

24 h exposure. For each test, six concentrations of the oil, each with five replicates and twenty

156

individuals per replicate, were used. Control insects were kept in the same condition without

157

any essential oil. Mortality was determined as described in the previous experiment. The LC50

158

after 24 h was calculated for the 1st instar larvae, pupae and adults treated with L. spica

159

essential oil using respectively the following doses (7.81; 15.63; 23.44; 31.25; 46.88; 62.5

160

μl/L of air), (250; 375; 437.5; 500; 562.5; 625 μl/L of air) and (156.25; 250; 312.5; 375;

161

437.5; 500 μl/L). In the case of linalool, the LC50 was calculated for eggs and 1st instar larvae

162

using respectively the following doses (62.5; 125; 187.5; 250; 500; 562.5 μl/L of air) and

163

(7.81; 15.63; 23.44; 31.25; 62.5; 125 μl/L of air). In the other developmental stages, even very

164

high doses did not lead to sufficient mortality to calculate LC50 values.

165

7

166

Data analyses

167

The mortality data were submitted to an analysis of variance, using Stat Box Pro

168

(version 6.40) (Grimmer software, France). When the treatment effect was significant, the

169

analysis was completed with the Newman-Keuls test at 5% probability. A probit analysis

170

allowed estimating the LC50 and 95% confidence limits after 24 h exposure, using the SPSS

171

version 20 software package.

172 173

Results

174

Developmental cycle of T. confusum on medium-grain semolina

175

The total development duration from the egg to the adult beetle took 43.07 ± 0.29 days on

176

medium grain semolina. The larval development, comprising 8 instars, took 32.52 ± 0.28 days

177

and the pupal instar lasted for 6.55 ± 0.07 days (Supplementary Table 1).

178 179

Mortality

180

Fumigation with L. spica essential oil and linalool revealed toxicity as a function of the

181

developmental stage of T. confusum, the tested dose and the time of exposure. A variance

182

analysis using 2 classification criteria revealed that dose and duration of exposure, as well as

183

their interaction, act with a high degree of significance on the mortality of the different

184

developmental stages (Table 1).

185 186 187 188 8

189 190

Table 1. Analyses of variance for Tribolium confusum mortality as a function of L. spica oil and linalool dose and treatment duration (time).

191 Mortality (L.spica) Developmental stage Egg

L1

L8

Pupa

Adult

Mortality (linalool)

Factor

df

F

p

df

F

p

dose

4

222.756

<0,01

4

1056.77

<0,01

time

3

49.943

<0,01

3

2.139

0.10035

dose × time

12

17.455

<0,01

12

3.218

<0,01

dose

4

1,385.937

<0,01

4

569.401

<0,01

time

3

369.365

<0,01

3

94.664

<0,01

dose × time

12

81.117

<0,01

12

14.759

<0,01

dose

4

145

<0,01

5

43.094

<0,01

time

3

66.461

<0,01

3

17.731

<0,01

dose × time

12

33.471

<0,01

15

10.265

<0,01

dose

4

2347.385

<0,01

5

426.547

<0,01

time

3

95.455

<0,01

3

336.029

<0,01

dose × time

12

53.115

<0,01

15

70.826

<0,01

dose

4

989.589

<0,01

5

79.933

<0,01

time

3

7.165

<0,01

3

31.159

<0,01

dose × time

12

3.286

<0,01

15

20.911

<0,01

192 193 194

The L1 larvae showed the highest mortality upon exposure with L. spica essential oil

195

(Figure 1B). Whereas the highest applied dose for L1 larvae (62.5 μl/L of air) elicited almost

196

100% mortality already after 24h of exposure, this dose elicited only very low mortality in the

197

other developmental stages (Figure 1). The highest tested dose (500 μl/L of air) caused 100%

198

mortality after 48 h in pupae (Figure 1D), whereas it took 96 h for a similar effect in eggs

199

(Figure 1A). L8 larvae were a lot more resistant against exposure with L. spica essential oil:

200

the highest dose caused less than 40% mortality even after 96 h of exposure (Figure 1C). For

201

the adults, the two lowest applied doses (62.5 and 125 μl/L of air) did hardly elicit any

202

mortality, but at the higher doses, close to 95% mortality was observed after 48 h of

203

fumigation (Figure 1E).

9

204

Linalool also proved very toxic against eggs of T. confusum with almost 100% of

205

mortality recorded with the dose 250 μl/L of air already after 24 h of exposure (Figure 2A).

206

Linalool is also toxic for 1st instar larvae: even at the lowest tested dose almost 100%

207

mortality was observed after 72 h of exposure (Figure 2B). For 8th instar larvae, the results

208

show that with high doses, recorded mortalities remain largely below 50% (Figure 2C). For

209

the pupal stage, linalool caused high rates of mortality from 250 μl/L of air on at 96 h

210

exposure (Figure 2D). Fumigation with linalool alone elicited much lower mortality rates than

211

the essential oil in adults. Mortality at doses up to 500 μl/L of air was negligible and even at a

212

dose of 1000 μl/L of air, only 25% of the adult insects died after an exposure of 96 h (Figure

213

2E).

214

Probit analysis after 24 h for L. spica essential oil and linalool revealed that L1 larvae

215

(LC50 = 19.535μl/L of air for L. spica oil; LC50 =14.198 μl/L of air for linalool) were more

216

susceptible than the other instars (Table 2).

217 218 219 220 221 222

Table 2. Probit analysis of fumigant toxicity data of Lavandula spica essential oil and linalool against Tribolium confusum life stages after 24 h of exposure. LC50 values are considered significantly different when the 95% confidence limits fail to overlap. The highest tested dose (still leading to less than 50% mortality) is provided for developmental stages with very low mortality. Life stage

Dose LC50 (μl/L of air)

95% confidence limit

Intercept

Slope

> 500 19.535

(17.892 – 21.188)

- 4.516

3.498

4

6.617 (1)

L8 Pupa Adult Linalool Egg L1

> 500 444.824 176.186

(370.903-522.358) (134.985 - 207.149)

-16.448 -4.808

6.211 2.141

4 4

23.419(2) 2.895 (1)

128.404 14.198

(90.878-165.494) (1.841-26.500)

-7.094 -1.355

3.364 1.176

4 4

16.318(2) 17.832(2)

L8 Pupa Adult

> 1000 > 1000 > 1000

-

-

-

-

-

L .spica Egg L1

223 224 225

df

Chi-square

Since the significance level is greater than 0.15, no heterogeneity factor is used in the calculation of confidence limits. (1)

10

226 227

Since the significance level is lower than 0.15, a heterogeneity factor is used in the calculation of confidence limits. (2)

228 229

Adult emergence of surviving insects after treatment at different developmental stages

230

Fumigation had different effects on the emergence of adults in surviving insects treated at

231

different developmental stages with different doses and exposure times. Variance analysis

232

revealed a highly significant effect of the factor dose and the factor exposure time, as well as

233

their interaction on the emergence of adults after treatments of earlier developmental stages

234

(Table 3).

235 236 237

Table 3. Analyses of variance for Tribolium confusum intact adult emergence as a function of L. spica and linalool dose and treatment duration (time).

238 Adult emergence (L.spica) Developmental stage Egg

L1

L8

Pupa

Adult emergence (linalool)

Factor

df

F

p

df

F

p

dose

4

367.657

<0,01

4

819.204

<0,01

time

3

63.209

<0,01

3

1.29

0,28296

dose × time

12

15.148

<0,01

12

1.949

0,04033

dose

4

1,884.328

<0,01

4

435.891

<0,01

time

3

158.313

<0,01

3

45.946

<0,01

dose × time

12

48.16

<0,01

12

10.512

<0,01

dose

4

64.382

<0,01

5

90.251

<0,01

time

3

28.713

<0,01

3

46.697

<0,01

dose × time

12

14.069

<0,01

15

17.659

<0,01

dose

4

1945.892

<0,01

5

554.195

<0,01

time

3

43.708

<0,01

3

310.174

<0,01

dose × time

12

23.491

<0,01

15

52.583

<0,01

239 240

The treatment with L. spica and linalool affected the emergence of adults from surviving

241

eggs and larvae in a similar way as mortality (Figures 3, 4). A large proportion of adult

242

insects hatched for the treated stages and doses with low mortality, whereas higher treatment

243

doses at susceptible stages lead to low emergence rates (Figures 3, 4). Especially for treated 11

244

1st instar larvae, the number of emerging adults was further decreased as compared to the

245

number of surviving insects with slightly stronger reductions for L. spica oil than for linalool

246

(Figures 3B, 4B). Most surviving L8 larvae from fumigation with L. spica reach the adult

247

stage even at the highest treatment dose (Figure 3C). The percentage of adults hatching from

248

larvae treated at L8 with linalool are mainly affected by the 1000 µl dose at 72 and 96 h

249

exposure (Figure 4C). Insects treated at the pupal instar with high doses and long duration,

250

resulted in a larger percentage of emerging intact adults for linalool than for L. spica oil, and

251

consequently less malformed adults and mosaics (Figure 3D, 4D).

252 253

Discussion

254

To know the precise age of the tested insects at each developmental stage, it was

255

necessary to study the life cycle of T. confusum and the mean duration of each stage in our

256

laboratory conditions. The development of T. confusum on semolina under our conditions was

257

slightly shorter compared to the mean development time reported on flour at a slightly lower

258

temperature (Stamopoulos et al., 2007).

259

We then estimated in this study the mortality effects of essential oil of L. spica and

260

linalool by fumigation against eggs, larvae, pupae and adults. Our data showed that the toxic

261

effects of L. spica essential oil and linalool depend on the developmental stage, the applied

262

dose and the duration of exposure. A relatively high dose (500 μl/L of air) and a long

263

exposure time (96 h) with L. spica oil is necessary to kill 100% of the eggs of T. confusum,

264

whereas half the concentration (250 μl/L of air) of linalool alone has the same effect. This

265

indicates that linalool might be to a large part responsible for the toxic effect on eggs, because

266

the used L. spica oil contains 43.79 % of linalool (Kheloul et al., 2019). The same exposure

267

time and similarly high doses (196.9 μl/L of air) of Pimpinella anisum are necessary to cause

268

100% egg mortality in T. confusum (Tunç et al., 2000). Studies on other plant essential oils,

12

269

such as Allium sativum, Betula lenta and Cinnamonum zeylanicum showed a better efficiency,

270

killing 100% of the eggs at a dose of 20 μl/L of air and within 24 h (I şıkber et al., 2009).

271

Essential oils from Allium cepa and Foeniculum vulgare killed 100% of T. confusum eggs at

272

an intermediate dose and exposure time (100 μl/L of air, 72 h) (Karci and Isikber, 2007) and

273

around 10 g of Laurus nobilis essential oil/h caused 90% mortality of T. confusum eggs,

274

whereas rosemary oil was not toxic for eggs (Isikber et al., 2006). Due to very different

275

compounds dominating the different oils tested in the cited studies (though not provided in all

276

studies), it is difficult to correlate egg toxicity of the different plant oils with the action of

277

specific compounds. The generally relatively high resistance of T. confusum eggs to

278

fumigation with essential oils might be due to the lack of aeropyles and micropyles in their

279

eggs, as well as a thick endochorion layer and a greater intrachorionic meshwork as compared

280

to other insect eggs, which obstruct the diffusion of vapors into the egg (Gautam et al., 2015).

281

In addition respiration rates are low at the egg stage, reducing gas exchange and consequently

282

diffusion of volatiles into the egg (Emekci et al., 2002)

283

Comparison of LC50 doses at 24 h exposure, obtained for different developmental stages

284

with L. spica essential oil, shows that the oil is more efficient on young larvae (L1) than on

285

older larvae (L8) or other stages. This age-dependent effect has also been found with

286

Artemisia haussknechtii and Lavandula hybrida essential oils, with increasing LC50 doses

287

with the age of larvae of T. confusum, even though main compounds of these oils are different

288

from the main compounds found in our L. spica oil (Hashemi and Safavi, 2013; Theou et al.,

289

2013). 1st instar larvae were indeed also the most sensitive developmental stage to the linalool

290

treatment, with an LC50 of 14.198 μl/L of air. This confirms earlier studies, which had

291

identified young larval instars as the most susceptible to linalool (Stamopoulos et al., 2007).

292

Toxicity of essential oils and linalool thus seems to be stronger for younger than for older

293

larvae in this insect.

13

294

Our results also showed that L. spica essential oil is more toxic for T. confusum pupae

295

than linalool, causing not only mortality but also malformations of the adults hatching from

296

surviving pupae and mosaics and consequently reducing the percentage of emergence of

297

intact adults. Thus for pupae, contrary to eggs, linalool might not be the most toxic compound

298

within the oil. Similar toxicity for pupae as for L. spica oil was also observed in treatments

299

with another lavender essential oil, L. hybrida (Theou et al., 2013). When adults were treated

300

with L. spica essential oil, marked toxicity started at 250 μl/L of air with an LC50 of 176.19

301

μl/L of air following a 24 h exposure. Linalool, however, caused only a low percentage of

302

mortality in adults, comparable to an earlier study in the same species, where a dose of 100

303

μl/L of air applied for 24 h elicited low rates of mortality in eggs, old larvae, pupae, and

304

adults, whereas young larvae had not been tested (Saglam and Özder, 2013). Similarly, low

305

toxicity of fumigation with linalool was found for adult T. castaneum (Rozman et al., 2007).

306

Thus other compounds present in the essential oil might be responsible for the observed toxic

307

effect or different compounds may act synergistically.

308

Essential oils of different lavender species have been previously shown to vary

309

substantially in their toxicity on adults of the related species T. castaneum. Whereas

310

Lavandula stoechas oil showed an LC50 at less than 40 μl/L of air after 24 h (Ebadollahi et al.,

311

2010), Lavandula angustifolia had only very minor toxic effects, but details on the used doses

312

are not provided (Pugazhvendan et al., 2012). However, L. angustifolia was highly toxic to a

313

different coleopteran stored product pest, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Germinara et al., 2017).

314

Overall, effects of different oils on the same species and the same oil on different insect

315

species are highly variable, indicating that tests of different oils have to be performed for each

316

pest insect species..The highly variable effects of essential oils on different insects and even

317

different developmental stages of the same insect can be explained by strong differences in

318

metabolic activity and the importance of targets of active compounds. Certain constituents of

14

319

aromatic essential oils are known to have neurotoxic effects, whereas others are thought to act

320

on insect growth regulators, i.e. hormones (Isman, 2000; Tandon et al., 2008; Regnault-Roger

321

et al., 2012)..

322

Our study revealed that L. spica and linalool showed toxicity on certain stages and

323

ineffectiveness against other stages of T. confusum. They also caused malformations in adults

324

hatching from treated pupae, further reducing reproductive success through non-viable adults.

325

Thus the tested volatiles might represent a potential alternative to synthetic insecticides for

326

the control of the stored product pest T. confusum. Because of the long life duration of adult

327

beetles, relatively high doses also causing adult mortality would be needed at least in initial

328

treatments. Due to the strong odour of the used volatiles, direct treatments of stored products

329

are difficult to imagine, but treatments of storage surfaces might be more suitable instead, at

330

the same time reducing absorption of essential oils by the stored products, which could in turn

331

reduce efficacy (Arthur et al., 2011). Further studies are necessary to explore potential

332

practical application of L. spica essential oil and its main component including safety tests for

333

vertebrates and the environment and development of formulations.

334 335 336 337

Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

338 339

References

340 341 342 343 344 345 346

Abott, W.S., 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18, 265–267. Arthur, F.H., 1996. Grain Protectants: current status and prospects for the future. J. Stored Prod. Res. 32, 293–302. Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D., Idaomar, M., 2008. Biological effects of essential oils – A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 446–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106

15

347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396

Campbell, J.F., Toews, M.D., Arthur, F.H., Arbogast, R.T., 2010. Long-term monitoring of Tribolium castaneum in two flour mills : seasonal patterns and impact of fumigation.J. Econom. Entomol. 103, 991-1001. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09347 Davoudi, A., Shayesteh, N., Shirdel, D., Hosseinzadeh, A., 2011. Effect of diethyl maleate on toxicity of linalool against two stored product insects in laboratory condition. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 9918-9921–9921. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1039 Ebadollahi, A., Jalali Sendi, J., 2015. A review on recent research results on bio-effects of plant essential oils against major Coleopteran insect pests. Toxin Rev. 34, 76–91. https:// doi.org/10.3109/15569543.2015.1023956 Ebadollahi, A., Safaralizadeh, M., Pourmirza, A., 2010. Fumigant toxicity of Lavandula stoechas L. oil against three insect pests attacking stored products. J. Plant Prot. Res. 50, 56–60. Emecki, M., Navarro, S., Donahaye, E., Rinder, M., Azrieli, A., 2002. Respiration of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) at reduced oxygen concentrations. J. Stored Product Res. 38,413-425. Gautam, S.G., Opit, G.P., Margosan, D., Hoffmann, D., Tebbets, J.S., Walse, S., 2015. Comparative egg morphology and chorionic ultrastructure of key stored-product insect pests. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/83.3.879 Germinara, G.S., Distefano, M.G., De Acutis, L., Pati, S., Delfine, S., De Cristofaro, A., Rotundo, G., 2017. Bioactivities of Lavandula angustifolia essential oil against the stored grain pest Sitophilus granaries. Bull Insectol 70, 129–138. Gueye, M.T., Seck, D., Wathelet, J.P., Lognay, G., 2011. Lutte contre les ravageurs des stocks de céréales et de légumineuses au Sénégal et en Afrique occidentale : synthèse bibliographique. Biotechnol. Agron. Société Environ. 15. Haouas, D., Cioni, P.L., Ben Halima-Kamel, M., Flamini, G., Ben Hamouda, M.H., 2012. Chemical composition and bioactivities of three Chrysanthemum essential oils against Tribolium confusum (du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Pest Sci. 85, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-012-0420-7 Hashemi, S.M., Safavi, S.A., 2013. Toxicity of essential oil from Artemisia haussknechtii (Boiss), to larvae and adults of Tribolium confusum (Jacquelin du Val). Biharean Biol. 7, 57–60. Hu, Fei, Tu, X.-F., Thakur, K., Hu, Fan, Li, X.-L., Zhang, Y.-S., Zhang, J.-G., Wei, Z.-J., 2019. Comparison of antifungal activity of essential oils from different plants against three fungi. Food Chem. Toxicol. 134, 110821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.110821 Isikber, A.A., Alma, M.H., Kanat, M., Karci, A., 2006. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils from Laurus nobilis and Rosmarinus officinalis against all life stages of Tribolium confusum. Phytoparasitica 34, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981317 Işıkber, A.A., Özder, N., Sağlam, Ö., 2009. Susceptibility of eggs of Tribolium confusum, Ephestia kuehniella and Plodia interpunctella to four essential oil vapors. Phytoparasitica 37, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-009-0035-6 Isman, M.B., 2000. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot. 19, 603– 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00079-X Karci, A., Isikber, A.A., 2007. Ovicidal activity of various essential oils against confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin duVal (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Integr. Prot. Stored Prod. 30, 251–258. Kellouche, A., Ait-Aider, F., Labdaoui, K., Moula, D., Ouendi, K., Hamadi, N., Ouramdane, A., Frérot, B, Mellouk, M., 2010. Biological activity of ten essential oils against cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Int. J. Integr. Biol. J2 - 10, 86–89. 16

397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445

Kellouche, A., Soltani, N., 2004. Activité biologique des poudres de cinq plantes et de l’huile essentielle d’une d’entre elles sur Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 24, 211. https://doi.org/10.1079/IJT200420 Kheloul, L., Kellouche, A., Bréard, D., Gay, M., Gadenne, C., Anton, S., 2019. Trade-off between attraction to aggregation pheromones and repellent effects of spike lavender essential oil and its main constituent linalool in the flour beetle Tribolium confusum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 167, 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12831 Lienard, V., Seck, D., 2011. Revue des methodes de lutte contre Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), ravageur des graines de niébé ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) en Afrique tropicale. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 15, 301–311. Muñoz-Bertomeu, J., Arrillaga, I., Segura, J., 2007. Essential oil variation within and among natural populations of Lavandula latifolia and its relation to their ecological areas. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2007.03.006 Pantenius, C.U., 1988. Storage losses in traditional maize granaries in Togo. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 9, 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400005610 Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.D., Batista, M.D., Silva, F.H. da, 2008. Resistance of storedproduct insects to phosphine. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 43, 1671–1676. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2008001200005 Pugazhvendan, S.R., Ross, P.R., Elumalai, K., 2012. Insecticidal and repellant activities of plants oil against stored grain pest, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2, S412–S415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60193-5 Regnault-Roger, C., Vincent, C., Arnason, J.T., 2012. Essential oils in insect control: low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100554 Rozman, V., Kalinovic, I., Korunic, Z., 2007. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 43, 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2006.09.001 Saglam, O., Özder, N., 2013. Fumigant toxicity of monoterpenoid compounds against the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Turk. J. Entomol. 37. Stamopoulos, D.C., Damos, P., Karagianidou, G., 2007. Bioactivity of five monoterpenoid vapours to Tribolium confusum (du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 43, 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2007.03.007 Tandon, S., Mittal, A.K., Pant, A.K., 2008. Insect growth regulatory activity of Vitex trifolia and Vitex agnus-castus essential oils against Spilosoma obliqua. Fitoterapia 79, 283– 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2007.11.032 Theou, G., Papachristos, D.P., Stamopoulos, D.C., 2013. Fumigant toxicity of six essential oils to the immature stages and adults of Tribolium confusum. Hell. Plant Prot. J. 6, 29–39. Timothy, D., 2009. Effects of crowding on the loss in weight of sorghum flour and on the survival and development of adult confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum in sorghum flour. N. Y. Sci. J. 2, 56–61. Trematerra, P., Stejskal, V., Hubert, J., 2011. The monitoring of semolina contamination by insect fragments using the light filth method in an Italian mill. Food Control 22, 1021– 1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.026 Tu, X.-F., Hu, F., Thakur, K., Li, X.-L., Zhang, Y.-S., Wei, Z.-J., 2018. Comparison of antibacterial effects and fumigant toxicity of essential oils extracted from different plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 124, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.065

17

446 447 448 449

Tunç, İ., Berger, B.M., Erler, F., Dağlı, F., 2000. Ovicidal activity of essential oils from five plants against two stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 36, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(99)00036-3

18

450

Figure Legends

451

Figure 1. Mortality rates (mean ± SEM) of the different developmental stages of Tribolium

452

confusum treated by fumigation with Lavandula spica essential oil. (A) egg, (B) 1st instar L1,

453

(C) 8th instar L8, (D) pupa and (E) adults. N = 100 (5 x 20 insects) for each treatment. Bars

454

with the same letter are not significantly different.

455 456

Figure 2. Mortality rates (mean ± SEM) of the different developmental stages of Tribolium

457

confusum treated with linalool. (A) egg, (B) 1st instar L1, (C) 8th instar L8, (D) pupa and (E)

458

adults. N = 100 (5 x 20 insects) for each treatment. Bars with the same letter are not

459

significantly different.

460 461

Figure 3. Proportion of emerging intact adults (mean ± SEM) from insects surviving

462

treatments with L. spica essential oil of immature stages. Treatments at (A) egg, (B) 1st instar

463

L1, (C) 8th instar L8, (D) pupa. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different.

464 465

Figure 4. Proportion of emerging intact adults (mean ± SEM) from insects surviving

466

treatments with linalool of immature stages. Treatments at (A) egg, (B) 1st instar L1, (C) 8th

467

instar L8, (D) pupa. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different.

468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476

Declaration of interests ☐ x The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

19

477 478 479 480 481 482

Highlights

483

- Spike lavender toxicity was stage-, and exposure time-dependent in Tribolium confusum

484

- First instar larvae were most sensitive to lavender oil and its component linalool

485

- Adult emergence of most treated stages was reduced depending on dose or exposure time

486 487 488

20