Fundamentals in Artificial Intelligence for Vascular Surgeons

Fundamentals in Artificial Intelligence for Vascular Surgeons

Journal Pre-proof Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons Juliette Raffort, Cédric Adam, Marion Carrier, Fabien Lareyre PII: S0...

506KB Sizes 1 Downloads 28 Views

Journal Pre-proof Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons Juliette Raffort, Cédric Adam, Marion Carrier, Fabien Lareyre PII:

S0890-5096(19)31033-7

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.037

Reference:

AVSG 4802

To appear in:

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Received Date: 17 October 2019 Revised Date:

17 November 2019

Accepted Date: 21 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Raffort J, Adam C, Carrier M, Lareyre F, Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.avsg.2019.11.037. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons

1 2 3

Juliette Raffort 1,2, Cédric Adam 3, Marion Carrier 3, Fabien Lareyre 2,4

4 5

1

Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, University Hospital of Nice, France

6

2

Université Côte d’Azur, CHU, Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France

7

3

Laboratory of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (MICS), CentraleSupélec,

8

Université Paris-Saclay, France

9

4

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Nice, France

10 11 12

Correspondence to be addressed to:

13

Juliette Raffort, MD, PhD

14

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Nice, France

15

30 Avenue de la Voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France

16

Telephone number: +33 (0)4 92 03 87 90

17

Email address: [email protected]

18 19

Keywords: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, big data

20 21 22 23 24 25

1

26

Abstract

27

Artificial intelligence (AI) corresponds to a broad discipline that aims to design systems

28

which display properties of human intelligence. While it has led to many advances and

29

applications in daily life, its introduction in medicine is still in its infancy. AI has created

30

interesting perspectives for medical research and clinical practice but has been sometimes

31

associated with hype leading to a misunderstanding of its real capabilities. Here, we aim to

32

introduce the fundamentals notions of AI and to bring an overview of its potential

33

applications for medical and surgical practice. In the limelight of current knowledge, limits

34

and challenges to face as well as future directions are discussed.

35 36 37

Introduction

38

Since its first introduction at the Darmouth College conference in 1956, significant advances

39

in artificial intelligence (AI) have been achieved leading to applications in daily life in various

40

fields from industry to finance, education, transport, marketing, media, telecommunications or

41

computer science. The earliest work of AI in medicine arose in the 1970’s and with the

42

development of machine learning techniques, AI has raised promises and hopes for

43

applications in clinical practice. On the downside, AI has created hype and ideas derived from

44

fantasy and imaginary world, sometimes leading to a misuse or a misunderstanding of the real

45

capabilities of AI systems for healthcare. In this report, we aim to introduce the fundamental

46

notions regrouped under the generic term “AI” and focus on the main techniques used for

47

medical applications. Potential applications for medical and surgical practice are discussed,

48

along with the current limits and future directions.

49 50

Fundamentals of AI in medicine

2

51

Terminology

52

AI corresponds to a broad discipline that aims to understand and design systems that display

53

properties of human intelligence, such as reasoning, learning, adaptation, interaction or

54

sensory understanding (1). It is an inter-disciplinary approach using principles and devices in

55

a variety of fields such as computation, mathematics, logic, mechanics, or biology to

56

understand, model or replicate intelligence and cognitive processes (2). In practical terms, AI

57

can be considered as the ability of a machine or a device to make autonomous decision based

58

on data collected (3). The terms related to AI and their hierarchy are summarized in Figure 1.

59

AI includes various branches such as robotics (applications of AI for motion), vision

60

(applications for videos or images) or natural language processing (applications of AI for

61

speech or written language).

62

Machine learning (ML) is a sub-discipline of AI where a technique ifs used to give the

63

machine the ability to learn (3). ML regroups a set of algorithms that are used to solve AI

64

problems (Figure 1). The technique is able to identify patterns from large datasets without

65

being explicitly programmed and without any a priori assumption. Input and output data are

66

provided and the machine determines the process by which the given input produces the given

67

output data. The process can then predict the unknown output when new input data is

68

provided (4). Three main ways for a machine to learn can be distinguished including

69

supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning.

70

In supervised learning, labelled inputs and outputs are provided for training. The program is

71

trained to learn a function that maps an input to an output of interest in a dataset that has been

72

labeled by a human supervisor. Once the associations have been identified based on existing

73

data and the inferred function created, it can be used to predict and map new data (5, 6). The

74

algorithm generalizes from the training data to unseen and new situations. This method is

3

75

usually used to predict or classify future events, or to find which variables are most relevant

76

to the outcomes (7).

77

On the opposite, unsupervised learning does not require any labelled or annotated data. It

78

helps to find previously unknown patterns in datasets without pre-existing labels instead of

79

trying to fit an input to an output (3). The aim is to uncover hidden patterns and natural

80

structure in dataset (8). It allows to explore complex relationships among variables in datasets

81

without any a priori assumptions.

82

Finally, reinforcement learning trains computer programs to make decisions and take actions

83

based on their ability to maximize a defined reward (5). It does not require labelled data. The

84

aim of the program is to collect as much reward as possible, finding a balance between

85

exploration and exploitation of current knowledge. The program chooses any action as a

86

function of the history and reward. This approach has been inspired from behavioral

87

psychology such as the operant conditioning and is useful to develop automated predictions or

88

actions.

89

Deep learning (DL) is a specific type of ML method which allows a machine to be fed by a

90

large quantity of raw data and to discover the representations necessary for detection and

91

classification (5). DL is a class of ML algorithms that uses multiple layers to progressively

92

extract higher level features from the raw input. It regroups computational models that are

93

composed of multiple processing layers to transform the data and amplify the aspects of the

94

input which are important for discrimination and suppress irrelevant variations (5, 9). The

95

development of DL algorithms has led to many advances in various fields including speech

96

recognition, visual object recognition and detection, drug discovery or genomics (10).

97

Numerous DL algorithms exist, among which Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and

98

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) are the most commonly used for medical applications.

4

99

ANN are inspired by biological nervous system in which neurons transmit electrical signals

100

from one end to the other. Each neuron is connected to multiple other neurons, organized in

101

layers and receive input data, process it to give an output (11) The first layer is called the

102

“input layer” and the last layer the “output layer”. The “hidden layers” between are often

103

called “black box” as it is unknown how the neural network derived a specific result. During

104

the learning process, the connection strength between the neurons is adapted by the

105

applications of weights which weaken or enhance the signal. The updating of the weights is

106

determined using the back-propagation method of the error estimated between the predicted

107

outcome and the correct output.

108

Convolutional neural network (CNN) is often applied to image processing and enables

109

detection, segmentation and recognition of objects and regions within images (10). It is

110

composed of a multilayered network with mathematical model simulating some of the

111

properties of the visual cortex. The neurons process portions of the input image and provide a

112

filtered representation of the original image. The process is repeated in each layer until the

113

final input.

114 115 116

Overview of AI in Medicine

117

Since the earliest work on AI in medicine in the 1970’s (12), advances of technology and

118

computational methods has led to a growing interest for potential applications in both medical

119

research and clinical practice (Figure 1). According to Vuong et al., the use of AI in medicine

120

can schematically be categorized in to two main branches: the physical branch which includes

121

the development of assistive robots for care, surgery or drug delivery, and the virtual branch

122

including the development of informatics approach and expert systems (13).

5

123

The number of publications of AI in medicine has increased exponentially over the past

124

decade (14, 15) . The total number of published paper on the topic in the Web of Science

125

(WOS) database was estimated to be 27 451 at the end of the year 2018, with 61% of the

126

articles published between 2014 and 2018 (14). The most prolific countries in AI in health

127

and medicine were the United States, accounting for approximately of 30.8% of the published

128

articles, followed by China, European countries and India (14). France was ranked at the 6th

129

place with a total number of publication of 1308 (3.8%) at the end of 2018. Interestingly,

130

trends have been observed regarding the topic studied and the potential applications of AI in

131

medicine (13). Western countries tend to have a clinically-focus approach with projects

132

oriented toward specific diseases such as cancer or cardiovascular diseases. Low and middle-

133

income countries rather develop applications oriented toward the public healthcare sector

134

(13).

135

There is a growing interest of applications of AI in medicine involving all medical and

136

surgical specialties. While there is a large number of publications on the topic related to

137

cancerology, radiology, cardiology or even neurology, AI is less reported in vascular disease

138

management (15). Nevertheless, the increase of AI-related publications for vascular disease

139

has been estimated to be 147% over a 17-year evaluation period (2000- 2016), suggesting a

140

real potential for a future use in medical practice.

141

Concomitantly with the raise of published articles, the number of registered clinical trials has

142

drastically increased over the past few years, demonstrating the renewed interest toward

143

applications of AI for clinical practice (16). Finally, the venture capital backed for healthcare

144

AI startups has raised among the past few years, suggesting that AI-driven products and

145

technologies are to be expected in the next future (17).

146

Applications of AI in cardiovascular diseases and vascular surgery

147

Type of medical data

6

148

A wide range of medical data can be used to develop AI algorithms and the term “big data”

149

corresponds to a large amount of collected data. Electronic health records have been

150

extensively used as they contain valuable information including structured data (such as

151

diagnosis, treatments or laboratory tests) and unstructured data (such as free-text clinical

152

notes) (9, 18). While health electronic reports present the advantage to be easily available,

153

many challenges remain for developing AI algorithms. Data are often heterogeneous and

154

sparse, with missing information. Besides, the coding systems used in medical records vary

155

between institutions all over the world (18). In addition to health records, medical images are

156

a major source of data useful to assess the diagnosis, the prognosis and the therapeutic

157

response of patients. ML and DL approaches have been widely developed in cardiovascular

158

imaging to facilitate image segmentation and classification (3, 7, 19). Physiological data (e.g.

159

electrocardiograms) can also be analyzed and several AI methods have been applied to help in

160

the interpretation (20). Cardiovascular diseases are impacted by environmental conditions and

161

behavioral data can be used to assess the link between the lifestyle and health of patients. This

162

can include video and conversational data, social media or mobile sensor data (18). At last, AI

163

can be applied in medical research settings for the analysis and the discovery of patterns in

164

huge amounts of biological data such as genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic (9). Published

165

data from previous work are also a major source of information in both fundamental and

166

clinical research. AI approaches can be used to extract useful information from biomedical

167

literature data (21). Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI which enable a

168

computer program to understand human language. Such systems are useful to automatically

169

identify keywords and relevant information in large medical database. Finally, AI approaches

170

have also been developed to facilitate clinical trials design and data mining (22, 23). They

171

may be useful to optimize the power of clinical trials and facilitate the discrimination of

172

inclusion and exclusion criteria.

7

173 174

Technical consideration for deep learning

175

While ML initially required huge computational power, the development of Graphical

176

Processing Unit (GPU) has allowed DL to be performed on desktop machines (6). The

177

selection of an appropriate software package and the data preparation is a mandatory step.

178

This involves feature selection and treatment of missing data. The raw data are transformed

179

into features that are clinically relevant to reduce dimensionality of the data. Feature selection

180

is performed by the algorithm and allows to treat a large volume of complex data (24).

181

Missing data can potentially affect the performances to learn and their identification is crucial

182

to limit their impact by inserting labels or using auto-encoders (24).

183

Numerous DL algorithms exist and the choice of the most appropriate algorithm depends on

184

the aim of the study and dataset available. Once the algorithm has been defined, a large

185

amount of data is necessary during the training of the model to minimize bias due to over-

186

fitting (6). Indeed, when a dataset is imbalanced, predictions are biased towards the majority

187

samples. One method used to reduce the over-fitting problem and improve classification

188

accuracy is to augment the data. A key point in evaluating an AI algorithm accuracy is

189

external validation, which consists in testing the algorithm when new data are fed into the

190

model (24). AI technologies enable to search for patterns in given data without any

191

assumptions and understanding of concepts and principles, which make them strongly

192

dependent on the training data. Data used for validation should be collected independently

193

from the training dataset to assess the generalizability of the model (25).

194 195

Applications of AI in vascular surgery

196

Several applications derived from AI are to be expected in the healthcare information system

197

and the management of clinical data registries. Such approaches may in term allow the

8

198

analysis and the identification of patterns in big data including clinical, biological and

199

imaging results (26). Surgeons play a central role in clinical data registries and a close

200

collaboration with data scientists would allow to optimize the relevance and the efficiency of

201

heath information programs and medical registries. Such advances could lead to various

202

perspectives in public healthcare surveillance as well as in medical research.

203

In addition to management of medical data, AI techniques are currently being developed

204

toward helping in the diagnosis and clinical decision making. In vascular surgery, imaging is

205

a key step in the care provided to patients, allowing to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate the

206

prognosis and plan the surgical intervention. Vascular segmentation is challenging as vessels

207

exhibit high variability of morphology, size and curvature. AI techniques can help to improve

208

image segmentation, pattern recognition and could be useful to automatically perform

209

repetitive tasks, improving the reproducibility and reducing the computational time. As an

210

example, several AI-derived methods have been applied to improve aortic aneurysm

211

segmentation allowing a deep characterization of the aneurysm geometry and morphology

212

(27-31). ML was also used to develop fully automated pipelines to detect and measure

213

vascular calcifications from CT-scan images (32, 33).

214

Computational programs were developed for image segmentation and risk stratification in

215

patients with carotid artery stenosis (34-36). AI offers interesting perspectives for image

216

segmentation, automation, analysis of data from health medical records, facilitating and

217

improving data acquisition and quantitative measurements in a large dataset of patients. A

218

combination of these methods may help to better evaluate the risk of patients and the post-

219

operative outcomes. As an example, several DL algorithms have been developed to evaluate

220

the risk of aortic aneurysm growth and rupture or to predict the outcomes after aneurysm

221

surgical repair (37-41) (42). There is currently no clear consensus on how to manage complex

222

aortic aneurysms such as juxta-renal AAA. Recent advances in endovascular technology have

9

223

led to the availability of multiple devices including fenestrated or chimney-endografts. A

224

recent study highlighted significant variations in the management of juxta-renal AAA where

225

either continue surveillance, endovascular or open repair were preconized by vascular

226

surgeons for the same patient depending on the country (43). This underlines a real need to

227

develop new tools to help surgeons to better evaluate the most adapted therapeutic approach.

228

By enabling the development of multi-variable scores combining clinical, biological and

229

imaging characteristics, AI may allow to classify the patient status, better assess the risk of

230

per and post-operative complications and guide surgeons to choose the most appropriate

231

surgical technique, especially in case of complex aneurysm. AI-derived methods could help to

232

improve the evaluation of the risks and prognosis of patients, facilitate the pre-operative

233

planning and propose a more personalized therapeutic approach. Finally, AI could also be

234

applied for medical training and education by enabling simulation of clinical situations. As an

235

example, virtual reality simulators have been developed and could be used for the training of

236

young surgeons on the basic endovascular procedures (44, 45).

237 238

Current limits and future directions

239

While AI-derived technologies offer potential interesting applications for medical research

240

and clinical practice, several challenges remain. The first technical concern relates to the data.

241

DL requires the availability of huge amount of data to train an effective and robust model.

242

Medical data are very heterogeneous, can be incomplete or inaccurate. They can also evolve

243

over time and be hardly interpretable (9). In addition, data are generated by various

244

manufacturers, are stored in many distinct registries, leading to a wide heterogeneity of

245

quality, formats, resolutions, dimensions and scales. A huge effort of standardization is

246

necessary to develop large multicenter databases. With the increase number of AI in health

247

models, the privacy and the security of data is another challenge to face for data sharing (18).

10

248

Another concern regarding AI algorithms is their external validation to evaluate the

249

generalizability of the results. Ideally, multicenter registries should be used to take into

250

account a broad spectrum of patient’s demographics and the replication of the results by other

251

groups should be evaluated. The interpretability of AI algorithms can also be challenging as

252

techniques such as ANN are based on a “black box” design, with little ability to identify how

253

and why such patterns were identified by the computer (26). The algorithms do not give any

254

causal relationship. The accountability of algorithms and the verifiability of analyses

255

generated is a major challenge for their use in clinical practice (46). Finally, the development

256

of AI for medical applications require an integrated environment with adapted platforms and

257

infrastructures with sufficient computational power. Political drive and financial support to

258

develop such technological infrastructure are mandatory for a future use of AI-derived

259

technologies in clinical practice. As nicely cited, medical institutions cannot be “partner to

260

Industry 4.0 if it is still stuck in Bureaucracy 1.0” (13). The role of medical practitioners and

261

surgeons is of utmost importance in the AI revolution. While institutional and technical

262

support is undoubtedly required, medical practitioners should play a role to develop

263

multicenter clinical data registries. A close collaboration between doctors and data scientists

264

is a key-point to develop fitting tools and guide engineers to answer the right medical

265

question with the right data (26). The expertise of medical practitioners and surgeons remain

266

necessary to evaluate the relevance and the safety of AI applications for clinical practice.

267 268

Conclusion

269

AI offers many perspectives for medical applications in vascular surgery including the

270

management and analysis of medical data, the development of expert systems for prediction

271

and decision making or the evolution of devices. It could be used in several settings including

272

the patients’ care, education and training of surgeons, healthcare information and surveillance

11

273

system, research or improvement of evidence-based medicine. While AI is full of promising,

274

there remains many challenges to face and unknowns to discover under the surface of the

275

“algorithmic iceberg”. The involvement of surgeons and medical professionals in these

276

technological changes is of utmost importance to guide and help data scientists and industrials

277

to develop relevant applications and guarantee a safe and adapted use in clinical practice.

278 279

Author contribution: All authors contributed to the conception of the manuscript, its critical

280

revision and final approval.

281 282

Conflict of interest: none to declare.

283 284

References:

285

1.

286

research/ai.

287

2.

Frankish K RWIITCHoAICUPC, UK, 2014, pp. 1-14.

288

3.

Dey D, Slomka PJ, Leeson P, Comaniciu D, Shrestha S, Sengupta PP, et al. Artificial

289

Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol.

290

2019;73(11):1317-35.

291

4.

Deo RC. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920-30.

292

5.

Panch T, Szolovits P, Atun R. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health

293

systems. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):020303.

294

6.

295

issues & solutions. Mhealth. 2017;3:45.

296

7.

297

in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart. 2018;104(14):1156-64.

http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/briefing-notes/artificial-intelligence-ai-healthcare-

Loh BCS, Then PHH. Deep learning for cardiac computer-aided diagnosis: benefits,

Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP. Machine learning

12

298

8.

Krittanawong C, Zhang H, Wang Z, Aydar M, Kitai T. Artificial Intelligence in

299

Precision Cardiovascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(21):2657-64.

300

9.

301

opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236-46.

302

10.

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436-44.

303

11.

Han SH, Kim KW, Kim S, Youn YC. Artificial Neural Network: Understanding the

304

Basic Concepts without Mathematics. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2018;17(3):83-9.

305

12.

306

stand? N Engl J Med. 1987;316(11):685-8.

307

13.

308

Intelligence vs. Natural Stupidity: Evaluating AI readiness for the Vietnamese Medical

309

Information System. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2).

310

14.

311

Research in Artificial Intelligence in Health and Medicine: A Bibliometric Study. J Clin Med.

312

2019;8(3).

313

15.

314

2019

315

16.

316

2018;1:54.

317

17.

318

expert-intelligence/.

319

18.

320

Directions. Yearb Med Inform. 2019;28(1):16-26.

321

19.

322

Learning Approaches in Cardiovascular Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(10).

Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review,

Schwartz WB, Patil RS, Szolovits P. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Where do we

Vuong QH, Ho MT, Vuong TT, La VP, Ho MT, Nghiem KP, et al. Artificial

Tran BX, Vu GT, Ha GH, Vuong QH, Ho MT, Vuong TT, et al. Global Evolution of

https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(18)31931-1/pdf. Accessed November

Kolachalama VB, Garg PS. Machine learning and medical education. NPJ Digit Med.

https://www.cbinsights.com/research/artificial-intelligence-healthcare-heatmap-

Wang F, Preininger A. AI in Health: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future

Henglin M, Stein G, Hushcha PV, Snoek J, Wiltschko AB, Cheng S. Machine

13

323

20.

Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS, Shameer K, Miotto R, Ali M, et al.

324

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(23):2668-79.

325

21.

326

Bioinform. 2005;6(1):57-71.

327

22.

328

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8):577-91.

329

23.

330

clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: lessons learned from oncology. Per Med.

331

2019;16(2):83-8.

332

24.

333

learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(25):2058-73.

334

25.

335

of Artificial Intelligence Technology for Medical Diagnosis and Prediction. Radiology.

336

2018;286(3):800-9.

337

26.

338

Promises and Perils. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):70-6.

339

27.

340

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:1195-200.

341

28.

342

method: level set with region and statistical information. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1440-53.

343

29.

344

software system for estimating the rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

345

Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4641.

346

30.

347

for interactive CTA Segmentation by Active Learning. Stud Health Technol Inform.

Cohen AM, Hersh WR. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Brief

Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, Hu J. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Trial Design.

Krittanawong C, Johnson KW, Tang WW. How artificial intelligence could redefine

Krittanawong C, Johnson KW, Rosenson RS, Wang Z, Aydar M, Baber U, et al. Deep

Park SH, Han K. Methodologic Guide for Evaluating Clinical Performance and Effect

Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial Intelligence in Surgery:

Subasic M, Loncaric S, Sorantin E. 3-D image analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Zhuge F, Rubin GD, Sun S, Napel S. An abdominal aortic aneurysm segmentation

Joldes GR, Miller K, Wittek A, Forsythe RO, Newby DE, Doyle BJ. BioPARR: A

Maiora J, Papakostas GA, Kaburlasos VG, Grana M. A proposal of Texture Features

14

348

2014;207:311-20.

349

31.

350

pipeline for mining abdominal aortic aneurysm using image segmentation. Sci Rep.

351

2019;9(1):13750.

352

32.

353

Automated quantitative 3D analysis of aorta size, morphology, and mural calcification

354

distributions. Med Phys. 2015;42(9):5467-78.

355

33.

356

and quantification of aortic calcification at abdominal CT: application of a deep learning-

357

based algorithm to a longitudinal screening cohort. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(8):2921-8.

358

34.

359

CAROTID - a web-based platform for optimal personalized management of atherosclerotic

360

patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;114(2):183-93.

361

35.

362

review on automated lumen and adventitial border delineation and its measurements in carotid

363

ultrasound. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;163:155-68.

364

36.

365

Learning-based automated segmentation of the carotid artery vessel wall in dual-sequence

366

MRI using subdivision surface fitting. Med Phys. 2017;44(10):5244-59.

367

37.

368

Learning for the Prediction of Growth of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Humans. EJVES

369

Short Rep. 2018;39:24-8.

370

38.

371

abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an artificial neural network. J Vasc Surg.

372

2015;62(1):8-15.

Lareyre F, Adam C, Carrier M, Dommerc C, Mialhe C, Raffort J. A fully automated

Kurugol S, Come CE, Diaz AA, Ross JC, Kinney GL, Black-Shinn JL, et al.

Graffy PM, Liu J, O'Connor S, Summers RM, Pickhardt PJ. Automated segmentation

Gastounioti A, Kolias V, Golemati S, Tsiaparas NN, Matsakou A, Stoitsis JS, et al.

Kumar PK, Araki T, Rajan J, Laird JR, Nicolaides A, Suri JS, et al. State-of-the-art

Gao S, van 't Klooster R, Kitslaar PH, Coolen BF, van den Berg AM, Smits LP, et al.

Lee R, Jarchi D, Perera R, Jones A, Cassimjee I, Handa A, et al. Applied Machine

Wise ES, Hocking KM, Brophy CM. Prediction of in-hospital mortality after ruptured

15

373

39.

Turton EP, Scott DJ, Delbridge M, Snowden S, Kester RC. Ruptured abdominal aortic

374

aneurysm: a novel method of outcome prediction using neural network technology. Eur J

375

Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(2):184-9.

376

40.

377

Mackenzie J, Carreno-Jaimes M. Using machine learning methods for predicting inhospital

378

mortality in patients undergoing open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomed Inform.

379

2016;62:195-201.

380

41.

381

An Artificial Neural Network Stratifies the Risks of Reintervention and Mortality after

382

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; a Retrospective Observational study. PLoS One.

383

2015;10(7):e0129024.

384

42.

385

abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25(3):369-76.

386

43.

387

management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms consistent? A questionnaire based

388

survey. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018.

389

44.

390

et al. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Best Practices Using Machine Learning to

391

Assess Surgical Expertise in Virtual Reality Simulation. J Surg Educ. 2019.

392

45.

393

fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other learning methods in basic endovascular

394

skills training. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(1):227-35.

395

46.

396

Medicine. JAMA. 2017;318(6):517-8.

397

47.

Monsalve-Torra A, Ruiz-Fernandez D, Marin-Alonso O, Soriano-Paya A, Camacho-

Karthikesalingam A, Attallah O, Ma X, Bahia SS, Thompson L, Vidal-Diez A, et al.

Garcia G, Maiora J, Tapia A, De Blas M. Evaluation of texture for classification of

Atkins E, Mughal NA, Ambler GK, Narlawar R, Torella F, Antoniou GA. Is

Winkler-Schwartz A, Bissonnette V, Mirchi N, Ponnudurai N, Yilmaz R, Ledwos N,

Aeckersberg G, Gkremoutis A, Schmitz-Rixen T, Kaiser E. The relevance of low-

Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in

Park SH, Do KH, Kim S, Park JH, Lim YS. What should medical students know about

16

398

artificial intelligence in medicine? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:18.

17

Figure 1: Hierarchy of AI-related terms and relationship with medical research and clinical practice (adapted from Park et al. (47) and Krittanawong et al. (24)). AI is composed of many fields including natural language processing, robotic or vision. Expert systems and ML regroups a set of algorithms that are used to solve AI problems. AI-derived applications are being developed for both medical research and clinical practice.