A& Space Rex Vol. 25, No. 314, pp. 641-646.2000 0 2000 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved Printed in Great Britain 0273-I 177/00 $20.00 + 0.00
Pergamon www.elsevier.nlllocate/asr
PII: SO273-1177(99)00816-9
GAMMA-RAYS OF CANGAROO
T. Kifune
of TeV ENERGY PROJECT
for CANGAROO
Institute for Cosmic
FROM PLERIONS
AND RESULTS
Group’
Ray Research,
University
of Tokyo, 3-2-l
Midori,
Tanashi, Tokyo 188-8502,
Japan
[email protected]
ABSTRACT Copious production of electrons and positrons results in very high energy gamma-rays from the sources The emission at TeV energies is characterized and such as pulsar nebulae and supernova remnants. controlled by the interaction of high energy photons and electrons. The radiation of electrons links the TeV region tightly to the other bands, giving us the means of ‘multiwavelengths analysis’ to investigate production, acceleration and interaction of energetic particles. The absoption of TeV gamma-rays due to creation of electron and positron pairs puts constraints on the emission size of detectable sources. The point-like source of gamma-rays by proton progenitor still remains to be uncovered. 0 2000 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
1
INTRODUCTION
The way of seeing the Universe with High Energy (HE; at 100 MeV - 1OGeV energies) and Very High Energy (VHE; in the region of 100 GeV to TeV energies) gamma-rays is characterized by the interactions of energetic particles. The observation window at the shortest wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation was made widely open thanks to Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory (CGRO) launched in 1991 as well as due to the success of ground-based technique for TeV gamma-rays. The current status of gamma ray astronomy can be said, when taking the number of point sources for comparison, to be similar to that of X-ray band in 1970’s. The EGRET instrument of CGRO has discovered about 200 HE sources which consist of pulsars, AGNs (active galactic nuclei) and unidentified sources. The number of VHE sources is approaching 10; several EGRET pulsars, a few AGN and a supernova remnant. The VHE gamma-ray astronomy in ‘the CGRO Era’ is summarized and discussed in Weekes et al. 1997 and references therein. In Section 2 is presented a summary of CANGAROO (Collaboration between Australia and Nippon for a GAmma Ray Observatory in the Outback) observations in South Australia (e.g. Kifune et al. 1997) and the implication of our results is argued about in Section 3 paying attention to the ‘multiwavelength data’. The unique feature of VHE photons is their conversion into/from electrons (and positrons) via soft ambient photons. The process depends on, for example, the spatial size of VHE emission, possibly affecting the type of the sources so far discovered (Section 4). ‘WWW: http://icrhp9.icrr.u-tokyoac.jp; T.Kifune, S.Le Bohec, S.A.Dazeley, P.G.Edwards, S.Gunji, S.Hara, T.Hara, J.Holder, S.Kamei, R.Kita, A.Kawachi, Y.Matsubara, Y.Mizumoto, M.Mori, M.Moriya, H.Muraishi, Y.Muraki, T.Naito, K.Nishijima, S.Ogio, J.R.Patterson, M.D.Roberts, G.P.Rowell, T.Sako, KSakurazawa, N.Sato, R.Susukita, R.Suzuki, T.Tamura, T.Tanimoti, G.J.Thornton, S.Yanagita, T.Yoshida, T.Yoshikoshi 641
T. Kifune
642
CANGAROO
2
The first object
and VHE
firmly confirmed
group, or the break-through
as a VHE
was almost
simultaneous
pulsars of EGR.ET
detection. following
et al.
1995) and Vela pulsar
sources.
The VHE signals arc unpulsed; star.
non-thermal
X-rays
direct
Three
AGNs classified
as blazars
Efforts
of CANGAROO
to detect
negative
results
(Roberts
at redshift
et al.
1998).
remnants,
with one arcminute
3
VHE
result
B1706-44
Koyama
motivated
X-ray
in HE band.
which corotates
with
one from the pulsar nebula.
plerion,
et al.
our VHE
emission
(1995)
et al.
to search
199813).
by the SN shock,
As
detected
observation
(Tanimori
accelerated
0.03 are found as VHE emitters
The
and suggests
by the Whipple
from the AGNs in the southern
CANGAROO
has also attempted
(Sako et al. 1997), X-ray binaries,
and ‘after glow’ of GRB
observation
PSR
at the shell of the SN.
TeV gamma-rays
binary pulsar such as PSR B1259-63 supernova
-
pulsars,
magnetosphere
by unpulscd
without
electrons
are also likely to be shock-acceletated
for VHE signal in the commenced
by the pulsar spin period as detected
This
of -1OOTeV
searches
have been found to be VHE gamma-ray
in the pulsar
of the non-thermal
evidence
by the Whipple
after a long ‘dark age’,
Two gamma-ray
1997),
presumably
from the shell of SN 1006.
from the direction
signal provides
that protons
et al.
at higher energies
remnant
The detection
Telescope)
of CANGAROO
telescope.
originates
The signal is replaced
nebula.
and has stimulated
not modulated
of GeV gamma-rays
SN (supernova)
TeV gamma-rays VHE
(Yoshikoshi
SOURCES
Air Cerenkov
The 3.8m telescope
the Whipple
(Kifune
the neutron
(Imaging
with the launch of CGRO,
in 1992, as the second IACT
for the shell-type
RAY
source is the Crab
achieved by IACT
gamma-ray
The pulsed emission
GAMMA
(g amma
ray bursts)
observations
EGRET
group.
sky have so far been of Centaurus
unidentified
which BeppoSAX
A,
sources and
satellite
detected
accuracy.
GAMMA
RAY
EMISSION
and MULTI-WAVELENGTHS
SPECTRUM 3.1
Crab and other nebulae: Any prototype ?
The ‘entire’
spectrum
over ‘multiwavelength’
profile is consistently mechanism,
explained
i.e. synchrotron
is reasonably
by a magnetic
emission
the Crab is the only pulsar nebula in the EGRET with weaker magnetic
has shown that the Crab spectrum suggest deviation luminosities electrons
process
the Compton background) Electrons
or a proton
Lsync and Li, of synchrotron scattering
The strong magnetic 100MeV.
GeV band, while no unpulsed GeV gamma-rays The CANGAROO
up to several tens of TeV (Tanimori possibly
component
due to gamma-rays (e.g.
Aharonian
and inverse Compton
1997).
radiation
from the
observation
et al. 1998a),
frorn either another
Thus,
and may
population
The ratio between
of
the two
from the common
progenitor
field (WB) to the seed photons
undergoing
(Wphotun). By using the luminosity of the VHE gamma rays and X-rays as Lsync Wr,hoton to be the energy density W2.7~ of 2.7K MWB (micro wave
radiation,
we obtain
=
B -
a few ILG for the pulsar nebulae monochromatic
radiation
of PSR
at, the photon
B1706-44
100 TeV electrons
field is not much stronger
and Vela.
energy of
(1)
04
where E is the energy of target same -
scattering.
The (SSC)
and by putting
of energy E emit approximat,ely
k‘sync
nebula.
self Compton’
into the energy region as high as -
is equal t,o the ratio of the energy density of magnetic
and Lit, respectively,
and ‘synchrotron
field in those pulsar nebulae.
extends
from the SSC spectrum;
the inverse Compton
well known only for the Crab 200pG
photons served as the target of the Compton
field allows the nebula to have synchrotron others are consistent
field B -
photons
radiate
X-rays
involved in Compt,on
scattering.
and VHE gamma-rays
than 1pG and 2.7K MWB
As the relation
under the condition
is the rnain contributor
(1) shows, the
that the magnetic
to the Compton
scattering.
CANGAROO
Results on TeV Gamma-Ray?
643
by The approximation of putting LsynclLic = Lx/L, can be justified a posterior-i and self-consistently a few PG in the Vela and PSR B1706-44 nebulae. However, the consequent result, i.e. magnetic field stronger justification must await more detailed energy spectra in the X-ray and TeV gamma-ray bands as well as for the ‘entire’ spectral profile through X-rays to gamma-rays.
3.2
Relic and escaping electrons: Multiple populations ?
The emission region of the VHE gamma rays is displaced from the position of the Vela pulsar by about O.l”, apparently in accordance with the birth place of the pulsar. The radiation can be from the electrons which have survived since the pulsar was born (Harding et al. 1997). A comparison with the upper limit, on VHE gamma-rays from the compact nebula at the pulsar position would put constraints on the evolution of the Vela pulsar nebula during its life time. de Jager and Baring 1997 studied multiwavelength spectrum of the Vela compact, nebula by including the radio and CGRO OSSE data, which suggest B = 6 - 20/1G. Although de Jager and Baring (1997) presumed that the OSSE flux at MeV energies is from the compact nebula, we may argue that it contains contribution from the birth place of the Vela pulsar or the direction of the VHE emission. If so, the synchrotron counterpart of the TeV gamma-rays is in the MeV gammaray band instead of the X-ray band, and the TeV luminosity should be compared with the MeV one to give a higher value of WB /Wphotoll,which then implies; lower energy of the progenitor electrons, stronger B and/or a contribution of infrared photons to Wphoton. In addition, the site of the synchrotron and the inverse Compton radiations can differ from each other, because WB and Wphotonas well as distribution of progenitor electrons generally have spatially varying structure. As discussed in Aharonian et al. 1997 for the case of PSR B1706-44, a magnetic field as strong as 20pG can be compatible with the X- and VHE gamma-ray data when we assume electrons at N 20TeV have an escape time of N 10 yrs from the central N 1 pc to the outer region of B N 1pG. We have uncertainty about the size of the emission region which are not yet spatially resolved from the X-ray and VHE observations.
3.3
Supernova remnants: Proton progenitor ?
The Galactic disk is the most intense HE gamma-ray source and widely believed to be due to cosmic ray protons. There are several unidentified EGRET sources associated with SN remnant. If the GeV gamma-rays are from the protons accelerated in the SN shock, the GeV gamma-rays will have an energy spectrum of power index = -2, which suggests detectable flux of VHE gamma-rays. However, efforts have so far failed to detect the VHE gamma-rays from these objects. Interestingly, SN 1006 is a ‘reversed case’ in which TeV gamma-rays are enhanced compared to the GeV gamma-rays. If the VHE gamma-rays from the SN 1006 are due to protons, GeV gamma-rays are expected with intensity above the EGRET upper limits. Thus, the VHE gamma-rays are likely to be from the non-thermal electrons. By using the radio to X-ray data to infer the spectrum of progenitor electrons and by assuming that the seed photons for Compton scattering is dominated by the 2.7K MW13, t)he magnetic field is estimated to be about 10pG. Similarly, the emission of the unidentified EGRET sources with SN remnants could be explained by electrons radiating dominantly into the GeV gamma-ray region. We need to carefully investigate the following possibilities; the association with t,he SN remnant may be accidental; the GeV gamma rays are from the electrons concentrated in the supernova shell; effects of environmental conditions in the individual objects such as possible injection of electrons from associated plerion and various matter density sorrounding the SN remnant; the shock acceleration mechanism is to be developed to reconcile with the observations (e.g. Volk 1997; de Jager and Baring 1997). More examples of VHE emission are necessary, and CANGAROO recently made observation of R.XJ 1713.7-3946 (G347.5-0.5), a SN remnant quite similar to SN 1006, showing non-thermal X-ray emission.
644
4
T. Kifune
SIZE AND
In the EGRET outer nebula
pulsars,
OF EMISSION
region apparently
gamma-ray
energy
suffer from the cascade Let
changes
source, t,he radiation
becomes
process of electromagnetic
stronger,
interactions.
a simplified
more intense,
tend more likely to can be annihilated
and are prevented
density
to the
as the emission
field becomes
The TeV gamma-rays
case in which the number
-..
Generally,
and gamma-rays
pairs when they collide with the infrared photons,
us consider
REGION
from the pulsar magnetosphere
from GeV to TeV band.
smaller or nearer to the central compact field in the pulsar magnetosphere
into electron-positron outwards.
DENSITY
the emission
when we increase
region becomes the magnetic
ENERGY
from escaping
nir of infrared
photons
is
Gamma Ray Burst
A tive Galactic
Nuclei
Log (Size r (cm)) Figure 1: The energy density of radiation from interesting
objects
is calculated
T from the central
compact
kpc and 100 Mpc,
respectively,
object. that
point source of a given luminosity ones (a) and (b).
is plotted against spatial size. The energy density W of photons from L/(4 n?c) and plotted in the vertical axis against the distance The line (a) and (b) corresponds to the least luminosity located at 3 is detectable
with the VHE sensitivity
is to follow the relation
The line (c) indicates
the condition
r2W
that
=constant,
of N lo-l2
erg cmP2 s-l.
a line in pararell
A
with the
the size r is equal to the mean free path
of electron-positron itself.
pair creation by VHE photons in collision with the ambient radiation of the source The dashed line (d) corresponds to the compactness parameter (see text) 1 = 1, and is plotted for
comparison.
The density
of 2.7K MWB
proportional
to the luminosity
L averaged over wavelength
field WSoUTCc,
The
mean
the distance greater
line.
and thus also to the energy density of radiation
L W .sOuTCe n zv = -----~-. 47rr2c E &
where c is the light velocity, erg).
is also shown by the dotted
free path
(2)
and E the energy of the target photons (in the infrared band, i.e. z lo-‘” l/(nirgPpair) of p air creation with the cross section gppair varies with
X =
r from the emission center. In order that the VHE gamma-rays can escape, A must be The condition is as an order of estimate, z 1014cm. (L/(1033ergs-‘)(10-2eV/E).
than r = r,in,
schematically gamma-rays the detection
illustrated
in Fig. 1 as a function
of the energy density
W and the spatial size r. The VHE
are free from absorption threshold
indicated
if the source is below the line (c). The luminosity must be above by the line (a) and (b) w h’lc h are for the cases of 3kpc and 1OOMpc
distance,
respectively, for the source to be observable. Thus, the VHE objects are to be in the shaded region (A) or (B) in Fig. 1. The known Galactic sources, pulsar nebulae and SN remnants, are located in the region (A), demonstrating
that such ‘fairly extended’
sources
(angular
size is smaller
than the field
CANGAROO
of view of the VHE
telescope)
are appropriately
1 = La~/(47rrm,c2)
= r/AM,”
is commonly
and m, are the Thomson of Thomson
scattering
1 = r/XMev
detectable
technique.
the compactness
The parameter
of the AGNs, where ffT
and electron
mass, respectively, and XM~~ is the mean free path density’, i.e. W,,,,,, /(m,c”). The compactness parameter line (d), and most of the AGNs are outside the allowed region of
line (c) of r/X = 1. The detection
10 enhancing
with the current
used for estimating
‘MeV photon
= 1 along the dashed
the boundary factor b -
cross section
against
645
Results on TeV Gamma-Rays
the luminosity
of the VHE signals from blazars
when observed from the jet direction.
is due to the beaming
GRB
and the sizes less than
N 10” cm are also outside the region, implying that we can not, expect easy, ‘straightforward’ VHE gamma-rays and simplified
from compact
assumptions
as asymmetrical time variable blazars,
can make the constraint
made on stable,
sources,
‘DC’ sources
as well as objects
will be of increasing
of
The result in Fig. 1 is, however, based on the static conditions the radiation field, and for example, t,ime-variable phenomena as well
about
geometries
have been mainly
detection
sources.
less tight.
with the phenomena
importance,
Observations
(at least, for the Galactic
possibly
providing
of the VHE
objects).
Studies
similar t,o the relativistic us with information
gamma-rays of violently
jets as we see in
on t,hc central
compact
objects. Simultaneously
with the absorption
the opposite
effect
of the radiation
of the higher
of the VHE
energy
field of the object
density
in the Crab gamma
5
at small r).
nebula
and blazars.
pulsars.
observation
by ROSAT
with synchrotron
In the EGRET
of synchrot,ron
radiated
processes
when assumed
strength
that VHE electrons
phot,ons, known to take place
will contribute
as ~(~11 t,o VHE
in blazars.
the TeV measurements.
of the dependence B1706-44
bands.
on the rotationa.
spectrum
or ‘micro quasars’
by spatial
is remarkably
different
between
in the VHE gamma-rays.
in the form of VHE gamma-rays The results
from Crab,
thus encouraging
from X-ray to VHE gamma-ray and the inverse Compton
from
Vela and
VHE observation
region is necessary
emission.
for
No less important
and optical light, which serve as ‘seed’ photons and also as ‘partner’
of photons
such as GRS
by HEGRA
photons
for annihilation
is coupled to thr VHE gamma-rays. 1915+105
(from which a possible
group) as well as close binary
systems
detection
like PSR B1259-63
size much smaller
if the signal from those are detected, of VHE
than ‘V lpc of pulsar nebula and SN remnant. Thus it will provide a new example and insight into the production and
interaction
mechamism
manifested
itself by the unidentified
EGRET
The time variablit,y
may suggest
1998).
luminosity
energy loss.
VHE gamma-rays
pair. The ‘entire’
of a VHE burst has been reported can be characterized
into the pulsed signals in the
as well as for unpulsed signals from
to argue about such feature
by the radio, infrared
of Compton-scattered
and bursters
pulsars
with young
energy loss is spent into the HE gamma-
which differ from each other,
between the synchrotlron
are the bands of longer wavelengths
pulsars
nebula’
study of a large number of VHE sources will provide an urlderstanding
The broad band energy spectrum
comparison
into electron-positron
‘inverse Compton
of energy output
energy loss from the pulsars manifests
A systematic
of the VHE emission
for the production
of rotational
on the spin-down
It is premature
have shown phenomena
of more pulsars. having better
which also suggests
a larger fraction
The dependence
of the spin-down
the pulsar nebulae.
nebula,
band relative to the spin-down luminosity,
and GeV gamma-ray
A fraction
and ASCA satellit,es have revealed that, most, of the luminous
In Fig. 2 is plotted the fraction
X-ray and GeV gamma-ray
et al.
The relative
into VHE gamma rays (by assuming
is ‘SSC’
seed photons’
X-ray
pulsars,
rays than radio and X-rays.
X-ray
emission.
CONCLUSION
The X-ray
PSR
the VHE
we need to investigate
the abundant 2.7K MWB increases with decreasing 7 M ore number of the ambient soft photons, the ‘seed
The soft phot,ons by other
rays, called as the ‘external
are associated
X-ray
Such example
by pair creation,
enhancing
itself against
M (L/10”3ergs-‘)(r/0.1pc)2. as WsourcelW2.7K photons’, at smaller T can be Compton-scattered
are accelerated
gamma-rays
gamma-rays.
New population
of gamma-ray
sources that seem to exhibit rmission
sources
may have already
violent time variation
from denser radiation
(Tavani
field of size smaller
than
646
T. Kifunr
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
33
34
35
36
37
38
Log(rotational
energy loss [erg/s])
Figure 2: Brightness in X-ray, HE and VHE gamma-ray bands of young pulsars. The luminosity relative to spin-down luminosity (vertical axis) is plotted for individual pulsars versus spin-down luminosity. The data for X-ray (circle) and HE gamma-rays (triangle) is from the pulsed signal, and VHE ones (square) are unpulsed luminosities. - 1 pc of the pulsar
nebulae
or SN remnants,
as in the case of the AGN out,bursts
and GRBs.
The CANGAROO project is supported by a Grant-ill-Aid in Scientific* Research from t,he Japan Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, and also by the Australian Research Council and t,he Internat,ional Science and Technology Program.
6
REFERENCES
Aharonian, F.A., Proc. of Workshop LiNeutrons Stars aud Pvlsaw”, Universal Academy Press Inc., Tokyo (1997).
(~1. N.Shihazaki
ct al., 1~1~439-448,
Aharonian, F.A., Atoyan, A.M., and Kifune, T.: iMolt. Nof R Astron Sot, 291, 162 (1997). de Jager, O.C. and Baring M.G., Proc. 4th CGRO Symposium (AIP Co7$ Proc. 410) 171, (1997). (1~ .Jager, O.C. and Harding, A.K., Proc. of Workshop ” Neutrons Stars an.d Pulsars”, et al., ~~483-486, Universal Academy Press Inc., Tokyo (1997). Harding, Kifune, Kifune,
A.K., de Jager,
O.C., and Gotthelf,
T. et al., Ap. J., 438, L91 (1995). T. et al., Proc. 4th CGRO Symposium
Koyama,
K. et al., Nature,
Roherts.
M.D., et al., Astron.
Sako. T., et al., 25th Int.
E., 25th I&. (AIP
Conf.
Cosmic Ray Conf.
(Durban),
ed. N.Shibazaki 3, 325 (1997).
Proc. 410), 1507 (1997).
378, 255 (1995). Ap. 337, 25 (1998).
Cosmic Ray Conf.
(Durban),
3, 193 (1997).
Tanimori, T., et al.: Ap. J. Lett. 487, L95 (1998a). Tanimori, T., et al., Ap. J. Lett. 497 L25 (1998h). Tavani, M. et al., Proc. 4th CGRO Symposium (AH’ Conf. Proc. 410) 1253 (1997). 6erenkov Telescope I/“, 87 &ilk, H.J., Proc. Kruger Work Sh,op “Towurds A Major Atomospkeric (1997). Weekcs, T.C., Aharonian, F.A., Fegan, D.J., and Kihme: T., Proc. 4th CGRO Symposi~urn (AIP Conj. P7.0~. 410), 383 (1997). Yoshikoshi. T., et al., Ap. J. Lett. 487, L95 (1997).