Gender differences in completed and attempted suicides

Gender differences in completed and attempted suicides

Gender Differences in Completed and Attempted Suicides EVE K. MOSCICKI, ScD, MPH Attempted suicides occur primarily among women, while completed su...

867KB Sizes 2 Downloads 66 Views

Gender Differences in Completed and Attempted Suicides EVE K. MOSCICKI,

ScD,

MPH

Attempted suicides occur primarily among women, while completed suicides occur primarily among men. Risk factors for both attempted and completed suicides include mental and addictive disorders, disrupted family environments, and precipitating events. This article presents an overview of findings on gender differences from epidemiologic studies of completed and attempted suicides, with a focus on suicide attempts among women, and discusses possible TeaSons for gender differences in suicidal behaviors. Ann Epidemiol 1994;4: 152-l 58. KEY WORDS:

Attempted suicide, gender, risk factors, suicide.

lumbia to 24.5/100,000

INTRODUCTION Completed

and attempted suicides are relatively rare events

that arise from a complex web of risk factors (1). They are extreme occurrences in a cluster of self-destructive behaviors that include less severe behaviors, ideation,

as well as increasingly

cluding suicidal ideation

such as casual suicidal

pathologic

behaviors,

with detailed plans,

in-

self-injury

without intent to die, failed suicide, and completed suicide. Attempted

and completed suicides share many underlying

characteristics,

but there also are important

tween them, including gender differences. understand

differences beIt is difficult to

attempted suicide, especially attempted suicide

among women, without understanding

the intricate prob-

lem of suicide itself. This article, therefore, from epidemiologic

studies of both

reviews findings

attempted

and com-

pleted suicides, with a primary focus on attempted suicides among women.

in Nevada (2). Traditionally,

suicide

rates have been highest in western states (l), with Vermont the single eastern exception

among the top ten.

Suicide rates differ by age, gender, and race. The 1990 age-adjusted

suicide rate for women was 4.5/100,000;

the

rate for men was 19/100,000 (2). The ratio of male to female suicide rates was thus 4.2. Consequently,

the scientific and

public focus has been on men and more recently on youth, because of their higher rates. The 1990 age-adjusted suicide rate for white women (4.8/ 100,000) was less than one-fourth (20.1/100,000) (2.4/100,000)

the rate for white men

(2). The age-adjusted rate for black women was less than one-fifth the rate for black men

(12.4/1000,000).

The distribution

of suicide rates for both

white and black women was fairly flat across age groups, with slightly higher rates for white women aged 35 to 59 years (Figure 1). The numbers of suicides for black women above age 50 were so low (< 20 in each 5-year age group) that age-specific rates were not estimated (2). In contrast to the similar age distributions

EPIDEMIOLOGY Incidence

OF COMPLETED

and Sociodemographic

SUICIDES

Characteristics

Suicide is the eighth leading cause of death in the United States. In 1990, the most recent year for which final mortality data are available, there were 30,906 suicide deaths, rep resenting 1.4% of the total number of deaths (2). Of these,

the age distributions

for black and white women,

for black and white men differed (see

Figure 1). Suicide rates for white men increased with age, while rates for black men peaked at ages 25 to 29, declined to age 65, and then peaked again at ages 70 to 74. These gender, race, and age-specific patterns also are evident when period and cohort effects are controlled

for (4).

6182 were committed by women. Homicide and suicide combined are the fourth leading cause of potential years of

Risk Factors

life lost (3). Suicide rates vary widely from state to state, and in 1990 ranged from 6.1/ 100,000 in the District of Co-

Systematic efforts to understand suicide began with Durkheim’s classic work in the late 19th century (5). With increasingly rigorous scientific work, including the application of multivariate

From the Prevention Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health. Rockville. MD. Address reprint requests to: Eve K. MoScicki, ScD, MPH, Prevention Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Room 10-85, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Received June 11, 1993; revised September 6, 1993. 0 1994b Elsevier Science Inc.

models in epidemiologic

studies of both com-

pleted and attempted suicide, has come increasing understanding of the interrelated risk factors for suicide. Although most research has been done in men, many risk factors

are believed

to be applicable

to both

men and

women. 1047.2797/94/$07.00

153

MoScicki GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SUICIDE

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 1994: 152-158

Rates per 100,000 80 I

60

20

0 15-19 10-14

25-29

35-39

20-24

30-34

45-49 40-44

5-Year

55-59 50-54

65-69

65t

75-79

60-64

70-74

60-84

Age Groups

FIGURE 1. Suicide rates per 100,000 population by gender, race, and S-year age groups, United States, 1990. Rates were not calculated when based on fewer than 20 deaths. (Unpublished data from the National Center for Health Statistics.)

Suicide is a complex behavior with multiple risk factors, which fall into two broad categories-distal

and proximal.

Distal risk factors represent the foundation

on which events

Postmortem

studies have found reduced serotonergic

ity in the brains of suicide victims (20, 21), although not clear whether the effect of serotonin

associated with suicidal behavior are built, but do not lead

behaviors

directly to attempted

cific psychiatric

include underlying

or completed

psychiatric,

suicide. Distal factors

biologic,

(6). The strongest observed associations

and familial risks are for psychiatric

activit is

levels on suicidal

is direct, or whether it is mediated through spedisorders (18, 22).

Proximal risk factors are precipitating

circumstances

sociated with the suicide event itself. In combination

aswith

disorders (1, 6). More than 90% of completed suicides are

strong distal risk factors such as mental or addictive disor-

associated with mental or addictive disorders (7-9), the most

ders and a disrupted familial environment,

common of which are depression, personality disorders, and

factors contribute

alcohol abuse (7-10).

for suicide. Such “triggering” events are likely to differ with

Comorbid

occurrence

of more than

one psychiatric disorder, or comorbid mental and drug use disorders have been found frequently

(7, 8, 11, 12), sug-

proximal

risk

to the necessary and sufficient conditions

age, gender, ethnicity,

and other sociodemographic

factors.

The presence of a firearm in the home has been shown

gesting that completed suicide is associated with more severe

to be a major situational

forms of mental illness. It is likely that distal risk factors

Firearms account for nearly 60% of all suicide deaths; it is

are necessary, but not sufficient, for suicide to occur (7). Other distal risk factors include a family history of suicide and/or mental or addictive disorders (13, 14), and a disrupted family environment vorce, widowhood,

as defined by separation,

di-

or family violence. Suicide rates for di-

vorced and widowed women and men are higher than rates

factor in suicide deaths (23-25).

the method of choice for both men and women, followed by drugs and medicaments’

for women and hanging

for

men. Other alcohol,

proximal

risk factors include intoxication

with

crack cocaine, or other drugs (26, 27); recent, se-

vere, stressful life events such as the death of a spouse

for married persons (1, 15). In the case of divorce or separa-

(among young people, the sudden death of a friend or ac-

tion, it is not clear whether the disruption of the marriage

quaintance);

itself leads to suicide, or whether persons who are more likely to be suicidal also are more likely to be in an unstable

to the suicidal behavior of others (29); economic problems (28); finding oneself in jail (28, 30); and being diagnosed

marriage. A family environment

that includes violence in

with acquired

interpersonal

loss or rejection

immunodeficiency

syndrome

(28); exposure

(AIDS)

(3 1).

the form of physical and sexual abuse also may contribute to suicide risk (16, 17). In addition, there is consistent

evi-

dence that biologic risk factors may be associated with suicide and suicidal behavior

and with impulsivity (18, 19).

’“Medicaments” is the term used by the National Center for Health Statistics to classify self-inflicted deaths from medicinal agents.

154

Mdcicki GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SUICIDE

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 1994: 152-158

One precipitating factor that has long been thought to con-

of the attempters, and the most common method of attempt

tribute to suicide, particularly in older adults, is the presence

was self-medication,

of a chronic

attempts (43).

or terminal

illness. Physical illness, however,

has not been shown to be an independent suicide outside the context psychopathology

accounting for 70 to 90% of all reported

risk factor for

A recent study based on surveillance of Oregon hospitals

of clinical depression or other

in 1988 reported an annual attempted suicide rate of 214/

(32).

100,000 for children (36). Eighty-four

and adolescents

aged 10 to 17 years

percent of the attempters

were females.

The most common method used by suicide attempters was EPIDEMIOLOGY

OF ATTEMPTED

drug overdose,

SUICIDE

which accounted

for 76% of all reported

attempts. The ratio of attempted to completed suicide rates

between Completed and Attempted Suicides

was estimated at 47. No data were collected for adults.

Although

Community

Differences

completed and attempted suicides have common

characteristics,

there also are important differences, limiting

the generalizability of findings between populations of completers and attempters.

One important

difference

is that

nearly 80% of suicide completers are men, while the majority of attempters are women. Another

is that not all attempters

injure themselves with the intent to die. Even when there is a strong intent to die, not all attempters injure themselves severely enough to cause death (33). Numerous

studies have shown attempted

suicide to be

a strong risk factor for completed suicide (7, 10,34). It generally is not considered

to be a clinically reliable predictor,

however, since it will generate a large proportion

of false-

positives, especially among younger age groups (35-37). One difficulty with predicting completed suicide based on a reported or observed attempt is associated with the measurement of severity of the attempt and the amount of suicidal intent associated with it (33, 38, 39). Self-inflicted

injuries

that are labeled as attempted suicides range widely in severity from a “cry for help” without intent to die to a genuine failed suicide. Some progress has been made in this area with the recent use of medical lethality as an index of severity, which appears to be an adequate way of distinguishing between most failed suicides and cries for help (33, 40-42). However it is defined (or not, in many studies), attempted suicide is an extreme form of behavior

and an expression

of distress that in and of itself merits study.

Studies

Lifetime data from the few community been conducted demonstrate on hospital data (44-46).

There are no national, population-based

men; other studies (45,46) did not report separate estimates of attempts by gender, but did note that risk was higher in women.

All of these reports suggested that attempted

suicide occurred more frequently

suicide. Weissman (43) reviewed English-language studies on attempted suicides between 1960 and 197 1, nearly all of

among persons with high

levels of psychiatric symptoms or with psychiatric diagnoses, especially depression (44-46). The best available prevalence

data on suicide attempts

among adult women in the general population

come from

the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Epidemiologic Catchment

Area Study (ECA) (38). Detailed descrip-

tions of the methodology elsewhere (38,47-5

and initial findings have appeared

l), and can be summarized here. Briefly,

the purpose of this five-site study was to measure selected psychiatric

disorders and sociodemographic

the population.

risk factors in

Data were collected from 18,571 adults 18

years and older at two points in time, 1 year apart. Information on psychiatric symptoms was obtained using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) (52,53), psychiatric

a highly structured

interview designed to be administered

by lay

interviewers. Diagnoses of psychiatric disorders were generated by computer algorithm according to standardized criteria established Psychiatric

data on attempted

Schwab and colleagues (44) found

lifetime attempt rates to be 4.0% for women and 1.2% for

in the Diagnostic

Mental Disorders,

Prevalence

studies that have

findings similar to those based

and Statistical

third edition (DSM-III)

Association

Manual of

of the American

(54).

The DIS included questions on thoughts of death, desire to die, suicidal ideation,

and suicide attempts.

rates were weighted to be representative

Prevalence

of the US popula-

which reported on data from hospital admissions. As might

tion. Initial analyses of these data indicated

be expected, there was a great deal of variation among stud-

prevalence

ies in completeness of coverage and data quality. Crude annual rates of attempted suicide ranged from 43/100,000

compared

in New Delhi to 730/100,000 in London, Ontario. With the exception of the New Delhi study, all reported a higher

attempted suicide was a lifetime diagnosis of any psychiatric

frequency of attempts by women than by men, with gender ratios ranging from 1.3 to 3.0. Weissman found that persons less than 30 years old frequently accounted for 50% or more

of attempted

that lifetime

suicide among women was 4.2%

with 1.5% among men, with an adjusted odds

ratio of 3.3 (38). The strongest independent

risk factor for

disorder, with an odds ratio of 8.4 (38). In order to determine whether the occurrence

of at-

tempted suicide was associated with severity of psychopathology, an index of severity was constructed based on the

155

MoScicki GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SUICIDE

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 1994: 152-158

number of clinical diagnoses. The sample was grouped into

black males = 0.8%), there were no statistically significant

persons with no psychiatric

more than one diagnosis, and compared on the proportion

differences between race and gender groups (42). Significantly increased risk for all suicide attempts was found to

diagnosis,

one diagnosis,

and

of suicide attempts, stratified by gender. Women had greater

be associated with aggressive behaviors,

rates of attempted suicide regardless of the number of diag-

hol use, and illicit drug use. Odds ratios increased in magni-

noses. In both men and women, persons with more than

tude for attempts requiring medical care, with the highest

one diagnosis had the highest rates of attempted

suicide

cigarette use, alco-

odds ratios associated with intravenous

drugs and cocaine

cantly by gender. Odds ratios were 3.8 for women with one

use (42). Andrews and Lewinsohn (41) conducted a detailed study

lifetime diagnosis (95% confidence

of psychiatric disorders in a representative cohort (n = 17 10)

(men = 7.3%; women = 21.8%). Risk did not differ signifiinterval (CI), 2.9 to 4.9)

and 17.3 for women with more than one lifetime diagnosis

of high school students in five communities

(95% CI, 13.4 to 22.3), compared with women who had no

Oregon. Attempted suicides were rated for medical lethality

psychiatric

diagnosis.

Odds ratios were 4.1 for men with

in west central

and intent to die. The lifetime rate of attempted suicide at

one lifetime diagnosis (95% CI, 2.2 to 7.7) and 18.7 for men

baseline was 7.1%; the rate for females, lO.l%,

with more than one lifetime diagnosis

10.7 to

cantly greater than the rate for males, 3.8%. Thirteen (0.7%)

diag-

of the attempts reported by 12 1 adolescents were considered

32.6), compared

(95% CI,

with men who had no psychiatric

medically lethal,

nosis.

was signifi-

and six (0.35%)

were given the highest

rating on intent to die. Lethality

and intent were signifi-

cantly correlated (0.67). There were no gender differences

Recent Attempted Suicides in the Community

in lethality. At follow-up, 2.2% of females and 1.1% of males

Lifetime data are subject to recall bias, since they are heavily

reported having attempted suicide in the 12-month period

dependent

prior to interview, but the gender differences were not statis-

on a person’s ability to remember

important

events. Since women are generally considered to be better

tically significant.

reporters of health history than are men, as well as more

reported for the follow-up period. One of the most striking

frequent

findings of this study was the extremely

users of health services, the higher lifetime rates

of attempted suicide among women may not represent patterns of recently attempted

suicide in the population.

Later analyses of the ECA data addressed this potential bias by examining

l-year prevalence of attempted suicide.

Medical

lethality

and intent

were not

high proportion

of attempters who met criteria for at least one psychiatric diagnosis at both baseline and follow-up. Eighty percent of attempters

at baseline and nearly 100% at follow-up were

diagnosed with major depressive episode, alcohol and other

The prevalence of recent attempted suicide in the year prior

drug use disorders, and/or a disruptive behavior

to baseline was 22/100,000.

The prevalence was 19/100,000

There were no gender differences in the proportion

in the year prior to follow-up (55). There were no significant

tempters diagnosed with any of the disorders (41).

disorder. of at-

gender or age differences for either prevalence period. The estimated overall ratio of attempts to completions When

stratified by gender,

however,

was 18.

the estimated

ratio

was 8 for men and 59 for women, reflecting the much lower rates of completed suicide for women. Multivariable

condi-

tional logistic regression analyses showed that the most pow-

GENDER DIFFERENCES BEHAVIORS

IN SUICIDAL

The gender differences between rates of completed suicide

erful risk factors for recent attempts were recent major de-

and lifetime rates of attempted

pressive episode, recent alcohol abuse or dependence,

significant gender differences in recent attempted suicides,

any

suicides, and the lack of

recent cocaine use, and divorced or separated marital status

present an intriguing epidemiologic

(55). These risk factors for attempted suicide are identical to

Several plausible explanations

problem.

have been proposed, some

the distal risk factors most frequently reported for completed

more plausible than others. First, there is the lethality expla-

suicides.

nation; that is, gender differences between

Two studies of suicidal behaviors in community

popula-

completions

can be explained

tions of adolescents also failed to find gender differences for

method.

medically lethal attempts (4 1, 42). Garrison

commit suicidal acts in equal proportions,

(42) analyzed data from the Youth in South Carolina.

more suicide behaviors

in the past 12 months although

Risk Behavior

Survey

They found that high school females

reported significantly However,

and associates

of all kinds

than did males, regardless of race.

the proportion

of attempts

requiring

This explanation

attempts

by the choice

and

of suicide

assumes that men and women and that all sui-

cidal acts are intended to result in death. Since men choose more lethal methods, however, their suicidal acts are more likely to result in death. The lethality explanation is frequently encountered in the literature (e.g., [36]). It does not take into account intent to die, however, and disregards

medical treatment was slightly higher among females (white

the role of self-injury as a signal for help. It also does not

females = 1.9%, black females = 2.3%, white males = 1.2%,

offer reasons as to why men use more lethal methods, partic-

156

MoScicki GENDER DIFFERENCES

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 2994: 152-158

IN SUICIDE

ularly in light of the fact that a firearm, an especially lethal

but simplistic prevention

means, is the method of choice for both men and women.

tiveness has been demonstrated

A second explanation time suicide attempts

for the greater frequency

reported

by women

efforts. Neither efficacy nor effecfor any existing suicide pre-

of life-

vention program. Indeed, the ability to predict which indi-

is recall bias.

viduals will die by suicide continues to be marginal (IO, 35).

Women are known to be better reporters of health history,

The preponderance

of powerful distal risk factors, espe-

and since most suicide attempt data from community studies

cially mental and addictive disorders, implies that a simplis-

are self-reported,

tic focus only on proximal or precipitating

this may explain in part the higher rates

among women.

risk factors is

unlikely to result in a substantial reduction of either suicide

A third explanation

to account

for differential

gender

attempts

or deaths.

Distal risk factors

also must be ad-

rates may be gender differences in socialization. According

dressed. Preventive

to this explanation,

intensive, and long-term as the behaviors they are intended

there are gender differences in culturally

interventions

need to be as complex,

acceptable self-destructive behaviors (56). Men are less likely

to prevent in order to have lasting effects over time (60).

to attempt suicide because attempts are considered

Ideally, prevention

“femi-

nine.” At the same time, men are more likely to engage in “masculine” self-destructive

behaviors

such as alcohol and

programs

risk factors simultaneously.

should address an array of

For example, suicide prevention

efforts need to be embedded in programs that address distal

other drug abuse, or use more aggressive and lethal methods

risk factors such as mental health and substance

of self-destruction

well as proximal

(57). This explanation

ported by the over-representation

is indirectly sup-

of men among chronic

abuse, as

risk factors such as responsible

firearm

ownership. Such programs are admittedly difficult to imple-

liver disease and cirrhosis deaths (2), by the large proportion

ment and monitor.

of men completing

and tested, however, the best hopes for prevention of suicide

suicides who were found to be intoxi-

cated at the time of death (7,8,26),

and by the large propor-

tion of men who commit suicide by means of firearms (37). The increased prevalence

Until such programs can be designed

and suicidal behaviors treatment

are identification

of mental and substance

and appropriate

abuse disorders.

of suicide with age among men

may indicate that women, especially older women, may be more willing and flexible in adapting to changing life situations than are men as a result of a lifetime of socialization and developmental

experiences.

less likely to respond

They

to severely

therefore

stressful

may be

life events,

such as the death of a spouse, with lethal self-destructive behavior (57). A fourth explanation

for the gender differences may be

found in the differential rates of depression and alcohol abuse. Women have higher incidence and prevalence rates of depression,

higher rates of recurrent

treatment

episodes,

and higher

rates, than do men (51, 58, 59). Men,

other hand, have higher rates of alcoholism abuse (51, 58). Clinical

depression

on the

and alcohol

is strongly

associated

with both completed and attempted suicides, and the higher lifetime rates of attempted suicide may be explained by overall higher rates of clinical depression among women. This explanation of completed

is not consistent with the higher observed rates suicide in men, however.

It is possible that

the lower rates of completed suicide among women may be explained in part by higher treatment

rates for depression.

That is, women in a major depressive episode may be as suicidal as men, but successful treatment for depression attenuates its severity and prevents suicide.

IMPLICATIONS

FOR

IMPLICATIONS

FOR

RESEARCH

The problem of gender differences

in suicide complicates

an already complex issue, and offers an interesting scientific challenge to epidemiologists.

The explanations

for gender

differences in suicide that have appeared in the literature, summarized above, can be examined logic hypotheses.

as testable epidemio-

In order to better understand

the gender

differences in completed and attempted suicides, however, it is first necessary to understand differential gender distributions

the reasons behind the

in the primary risk factors

for suicide, mental and addictive disorders. For example, although it is clear that severity and comorbidity

of psychi-

atric disorders are associated with both attempted and completed suicide, is the differential gender distribution chopathology Alternatively,

influenced

by severity,

and

in psy

if so, how?

how is severity of disorder mediated by gen-

der? How do distal and proximal risk factors interact with each other and with gender to produce attempted or completed suicide in women and men? Are there gender-specific biologic or environmental factors that protect women against certain psychiatric them from completed

disorders that also may protect

suicide? These and other questions

need to be examined in order to make meaningful progress in efforts to prevent attempted and completed suicides.

PREVENTION

Despite its complexity, a great deal has been learned about suicide and suicidal behaviors. Unfortunately, the scientific approach has not been widely applied to most well-meaning

REFERENCES 1.

Monk M. Epidemiology

of suicide, Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:51-69.

2. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance Report of Final Mortal-

ity Statistics, Public Health

GENDER

1990. Monthly Service;

157

MoScicki

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 1994: 152-158

Vital Statistics

Report.

Hyattsville,

MD:

1993;41.

DIFFERENCES

IN SUICIDE

26. Fowler RC, Rich CL, Young D. San Diego suicide study: Substance abuse in young cases, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43:962-965.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Years of potential life lost before age 65-United States, 1990 and 1991, MMWR. 1993;42: 251-253.

27. Marzuk PM, Tardiff K, Leon AC, et al. Prevalence of cocaine use among residents of New York City who committed suicide during a one-year period, Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:371-375.

4. Manton KG, Blazer DG, Woodbury MA. Suicide in middle age and later life: Sex and race specific life table and cohort analyses, J Gerontol. 1987;42:219-227.

28. Rich CL, Fowler RC, Fogarty LA, Young D. San Diego suicide study: III. Relationships between diagnoses and stressors, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:589-592.

5. Durkheim E (Simpson G, ed). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. IL: Free Press; 1951 (originally published 1897).

29. Davidson LE, Rosenberg ML, Mercy JA, et al. An epidemiologic study of risk factors in two teenage suicide clusters, JAMA. 1989;262:2687-

Glencoe,

2692.

6. Moscicki EK. Suicide in children and adolescents. In: Verhulst FC, Koot HM, eds. The Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. London: Oxford University Press. (In press.)

30. Hayes LM. Jail Suicide Technical Update. Mansfield, Center on Institutions and Alternatives; 1989;2(2).

7. Rich CL, Young D, Fowler RC. San Diego suicide study: I. Young YS old subjects, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43:577-582.

31. Marzuk PM, Tierney H, Tardiff K, et al. Increased persons with AIDS, JAMA. 1988;259:1333-1337.

8. Brent DA, Perper JA, Allman CJ. Alcohol, among youth, JAMA. 1987;257:3369-3372.

32. Clark DC. Life Threat

firearms,

9. Runeson B.S. Mental disorder in youth suicide: DSM-III-R II, Acta Psychiatr Stand. 1989;79:490-497.

and suicide axes I and

10. Shaffer D, Garland A, Gould M, et al. Preventing teenage suicide: A critical review, J Am Acad Child Ad o Iesc Psychiatry. 1988;27:675687. 11. Rich CL, Runeson BS. Similarities in diagnostic comorbidity between suicide among young people in Sweden and the United States, Acta Psychiatr Stand. 1992;86:335-339.

MA: National

risk of suicide in

Narcissistic crises of aging and suicidal despair, Suicide Behav. 1993;23:21-26.

33. Meehan PJ, Saltzman LE, Sattin RW. Suicides among older United States residents: Epidemiologic characteristics and trends, Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1198-1200. 34. Robins E, Murphy GE, Wilkinson RH, et al. Some clinical considerations in the prevention of suicide based on a study of 134 successful suicides, Am J Public Health. 1959;49:888-899. 35

Pokorny AD. Suicide prediction 1993;23:1-10.

revisited, Suicide Life Threat

Behav.

12. Shafii M, Carrigan S, Whittinghill JR, et al. Psychological autopsy of completed suicide in children and adolescents, Am J Psychiatry. 1985; 142:1061-1064.

36. Andrus JK, Fleming DW, Heumann MA, et al. Surveillance of attempted suicide among adolescents in Oregon, 1988, Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1067-1069.

13. Egeland JA, Sussex JN. Suicide and family loading for affective disorders, JAMA. 1985;254:915-918.

37. Moscicki

14. Roy A. Genetics and suicidal behavior. In: Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, Report of the Secretary’s Task Force on Youth Suicide. v. 2. Risk Factors for Youth Suicide. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1989:247-262. DHHS publication no. (ADM)89-1622. 15. Smith JC, Mercy JA, Conn JM. Marital status and the risk of suicide, Am J Public Health. 1988;78:78-80. 16. Briere J, Zaidi LY. Sexual abuse histories and sequelae in female psychiatric emergency room patients, Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146: 1602-1606. 17. de Wilde E, Kienhorst ICWM, Diekstra RFW, et al. The relationship between adolescent suicidal behavior and life events in childhood and adolescence, Am J Psychiatry. 1991;149:45-51. 18. Roy A, Segal NL, Centerwall Psychiatry. 1991;48:29-32.

BS, et al. Suicide in twins, Arch Gen

19. Kety S. Genetic factors in suicide. In: Roy A, ed. Suicide. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986:41-45. 20. Coccaro EF, Siever LJ, Klar HM, et al. Serotonergic studies in patients with affective and personality disorders, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989; 46~587-599.

EK. Epidemiology

of suicide, Int Psychogeriatr.

(In press.)

38. Moscicki EK, G’Carroll P, Regier DA, et al. Suicide attempts in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study, Yale J Biol Med. 1988;61:259268. 39. Garrison CZ. The study of suicidal behavior Life Threat Behav. 1989;19: 120-130.

in the schools, Suicide

40. Brent DA. Correlates of medical lethality of suicide attempts in children and adolescents, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1987; 26:87-89. 41. Andrews JA, Lewinsohn PM. Suicidal attempts among older adolescents: Prevalence and co-occurrence with psychiatric disorders, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992;31:655-662. 42. Garrison CZ, McKeown RE, Valois RF, et al. Aggression, substance use, and suicidal behaviors in high school students, Am J Public Health. 1993;83:179-184. 43. Weissman MM. The epidemiology of suicide attempts, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;30:737-746.

1960 to 1971,

44. Schwab JJ, Warheit GJ, Holzer CE. Suicide ideation and behavior a general population, Dis Nerv System. 1972;33:745-748.

in

45. Bagley C, Ramsay R. Psychosocial correlates an urban population, Crisis. 1985;6:63-77.

in

of suicidal behaviors

21. Stanley M, Stanley B. Biochemical studies in suicide victims: Current findings and future implications, Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1989;19: 30-42.

46. Paykel ES, Myers JK, Lindenthal general population: A prevalence 460-469.

22. Arango V, Ernsberger P, Marzuk PM, et al. Autoradiographic demonstration of increased serotonin 5-HTr and B-adrenergic receptor binding sites in the brain of suicide victims, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989; 47:1038-1047.

47. Eaton WW, Holzer CE,, Von Korff M, et al. The design ofthe Epidemiologic Catchment Area surveys, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:942948.

23. Brent DA, Perper JA, Allman CJ, et al. The presence and accessibility of firearms in the homes of adolescent suicides: A case-control study, JAMA. 1991;266:2989-2995. 24. Kellermann AL, Reay DT. Protection or peril? An anlysis of fuearmrelated deaths in the home, N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1557-1560. 25. Kellermann AL, Rivara FP, Somes G, et al. Suicide in the home in relation to gun ownership, N Engl J Med. 1992;327:467-472.

JJ, et al. Suicidal feelings in the study, Br J Psychiatry. 1974;124:

48. Myers JK, Weissman MM, Tischler GL, et al. Six-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders in three communities, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:959-967. 49. Blazer D, George LK, Landerman R, et al. Psychiatric disorders: rural/urban comparison, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:651-656.

A

50. Burnam MA, Hough RL, Escobar JI. Six-month prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites in Los Angeles, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:687-694.

158

Moscicki GENDER

DIFFERENCES

AEP Vol. 4, No. 2 March 1994: 152-158

IN SUICIDE

5 1. Regier DA, Boyd JH, Rae DS, et al. One month prevalence of psychiatric disorders in five Epidemiological Catchment Area sites, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:977-986. 52. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, et al. NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Version III (May 1981). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1981. 53. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, et al. NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38:381-389. 54. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980. 55. Petronis KR, Samuels JF, Moscicki EK, et al. An epidemiologic

investi-

gation of potential risk factors for suicide attempts, Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1990;25:193-199. 56. Canetto Psychol.

SS. Gender roles, suicide attempts, 1991;125:605-620.

57. Canetto SS. Gender Behav. 1992;22:80-97.

Sot Psychiatry

and substance

abuse, J

and suicide in the elderly, Suicide Life Threat

58. Eaton WW, Kramer M, Anthony JC, et al. The incidence of specific DIS/DSM-III mental disorders: Data from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area program, Acta Psychiatr Stand. 1989;79:163-178. 59. Shapiro S, Skinner EA, Kessler LG, et al. Utilization of health and mental health services: Three Epidemiologic Catchment Area sites, Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:971-978. 60. Muehrer PR, Koretz DS. Issues in preventive Curr Direc Psycho1 Sci. 1992;1:109-112.

intervention

research,