LINEAR
ALGEBRA
Generalized
AND
ITS
APPLICATIONS
19
(1973)
6, 19-36
Zilch and the Jordan Canonical Form
J. HEADING University
College of Wales
Aberystwyth,
U.K.
Communicated
by J. H. Wilkinson
ABSTRACT The concept
of zilch, previously
certain quadratic derivatives,
of field theory and denoting
is generalized in order to embrace n first order partial differential
tions, and the theory is developed the number of independent
1.
used in the context
forms in the field variables and their first space and time partial using the idea of reciprocity
equa-
in order to ascertain
zilch densities that exist for such equations.
INTRODUCTION
Lipkin magnetic
[l] has developed field variables
the word zilch.
certain quadratic
in a relativistic
Four-dimensional
framework
vectors
forms are such that their four-divergence
quadratic density
and the
authors
have
Broer
to
energy
electromagnetic
extended
relations
of the number Heading systems tion
relating
these
stress
of simultaneous
being
of reciprocity,
analytical energy,
that
Kibble physical
which concerned
the concept
than
momentum
[2]
and other
situations,
and
waves, using the calculation
by the model under consideration. of zilch resides
linear partial differential rather
flux,
to plane electromagnetic
in his investigations
[4] has shown
tensor.
forms but are
of the more familiar
energy
to further
of zilch forms generated
quadratic
of the field variables,
density,
ideas
[3] has applied the concept
reciprocity
from these
These quadratic
of the first time and space derivatives forms
the electro-
for which he introduced
formed
vanishes.
involve the first time and space derivatives independent
forms involving
physical.
equations, The
in certain
his investiga-
generalized
and zilch have been shown to emerge
concepts only when
0 American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc., 1973
J. HEADING
20 certain
conditions
defining
Heading’s which
are fulfilled
the linear system the
products.
investigations
reciprocity
flux
paper produces
Broer,
Maxwell’s
that
firstly point
equations,
and notation
by Lipkin.
of the tensor
properties
of
paper, the basic idea behind Broer’s
theory
zilch forms Secondly,
differential
appears,
Matrix theory is used,
showing how zilch arises solely from the
of view of the analytical
partial
the
rather than simplify it, since it gives
In the present
and how the resulting linear
analysis
from
into
from which Kibble’s
is modified and, indeed, simplified.
for Maxwell’s
originally
communication
are rearranged
using tensor analysis,
the situation
equations.
forms of zilch, in
as a sum of vector
a private
equations
zilch arises on account
equations.
communication
to special
all forms of zilch that may arise
The use of tensor
to complicate
roots of the matrix
differential
is represented
Maxwell’s
relation
forms of zilch arise. the impression
density
He acknowledges
in which
form of a reciprocity however,
were restricted
The present
from a linear system. Professor
by the characteristic
of first order partial
of partial
differential
are not independent
the theory
equations.
is extended
Maxwell’s
seen to be a very special simple case of a broadening
equations,
of those
given
to 1%first order
equations
can then
be
pyramid of generaliza-
tion. 2.
RECIPROCITY
FOR
MAXWELL’S
EQUATIONS
The notation curlwr
= -Y,
aw,
with div wr = div w2 = 0, is employed notation
enables
involved,
and we write these equations
where D E a/at. introduce
yielding
us to introduce
If
awl ,
curl we = ~
to permit generalization.
a linear
transformation
Matrix
of the vectors
in the form
T denotes a constant
the linear transformation
at
nonsingular
2
x
2 matrix,
we
GENERALIZED
The suffixes
ZILCH
JORDAN
CANONICAL
21
FORM
1, 1) are employed
(-
The characteristic responding
AND
vectors
roots (_f)
to facilitate generalization. 0 -1 o are + i, with corof the matrix 1 ( )
and(:).
Hence if’we choose
T= that is, Wl = z-1
=
z-1 +
Zl,
.$(\Vl + iw,),
iz_, + iz,,
IV2
=
-
z1
=
i(Wl -
iw,),
we obtain
namely curl z_1 = iDz_1, with div z_r
Dzr,
div zr = 0.
The equations
are no longer simultaneous
and the two pairs of equations
such as a column
in the two vector variables,
may be expressed
where a prime denotes the transpose.
Through
z and a corresponding
dual of z with respect to an orthogonal are related
curl zr = -
in the form
this investigation,
skewsymmetric
rotation
matrices
matrix
Z (the
of three-dimensional
axes)
by
Thus a vector product
u A v means the same thing as the column matrix
Uv, as may be checked
immediately.
22
J. HEADING
The two sets of Eqs. z_i may be distinct be written
(3) are independent,
in zi.
These equations
in
may
simply in the form
0'31= 0,
0'3-1= 0, where
so wi and w2 occurring
from wi and ws occurring
the
row
31,3_1are
operator
q’ denotes
skewsymmetric
matrices
(-
iD
(4) The
8’).
two matrices
of order four.
We note that
3-131=(_ y_, $)(fI since Z_,Z,
= z,z’,
product operator
31 commute.
-
-;')=(;I;:
being the expansion
(zllz,)I,
z_i A z, A. 53-r
Moreover,
z_lzll +:2zyy (a_,z,)I)J of the triple vector
has the same explicit form, so
the product
3_Ji
is symmetric,
3_1and
seen from the
above, or by noting that
(3-131)' = 31'3L (each is skewsymmetric)
= 3i3_i
3_131
=
(commutative
It is this fact that leads to the existence We now consider 0, appended
of reciprocity
the four-divergence
to a symbol
be differentiated
thus,
rule for differentiating
and zilch.
3_131.A
of the product
will denote
(3&,
by an operator
multiplication).
suffix
that the term is not to
placed on its left.
In keeping
with the
of two terms, we have
once a product
q'El311 = q'[3-l(3dOl + q'1(3-do311 = @'3-1)(31h + q'mlh311' (symmetric) = 0 + q'[31(3_1)01 = 0, by Eqs. (4). Hence the four-divergence this
is the required
different
reciprocity
fields wi, ws are used in 3-i
One real solution real solution Placing
of Eqs.
of the product 3-i&
relation
for Maxwell’s
vanishes, equations
and when
and 3i respectively.
(1) will be denoted
by xi, x2, and a second
by yi, y2. z_i = xi + ix,,
since all equations
z2 = yi -
are homogeneous),
its real and imaginary
parts thus :
iy,
(the factors
4 are irrelevant
we resolve the product
3_131into
GENERALIZED
ZILCH
AND JORDAN
CANONICAL
23
FORM
3-131 Xl’Yl + X2’Y2 =
iXlYl +i
(XlYl
+ X2Y2
X2’Yl ( X2Yl
X1Y1’ + Y1Xl’ +
(X2Yl
XlYZ
so the vanishing
reciprocity
X2Y2’ + YZX,’ -
Xl’Y2
-
+ X2Y2)’
X2Y1’ -
-
X1Y2’ + YlX2’ -
of its four-divergence
(-
@1’y1+
XlY2)’ Y2X1’ -
V’)
iD
x,‘Y,)I
(Xe’Y1 -
(3_131) yields
X,‘Y,P
) ’
the eight
relations D(x,‘Y,
+ XZ’YZ) -
W,‘Y,
-
WRY,
(X2’Yl -
W,Y,
-
-
-
Energy-momentum
+
V’[x2~1’
-
X,Y,)
= 0,
(5)
+ X,Y,)
= 0,
(6)
~1~2’ +
~1x2’
-
~2x1’
Xl'Y2)Il = 0,
X,Y,)’
(X1’Yl
-
~1’~s) + V’(X,Y,
+ X,Y,)’
-
V’(&YI
+
V’[xlyl’
X,‘Y,)~l
(7)
+ ~1x1’
+
~2~2’ +
YZA
= 0.
(8)
forms arise by placing xl = yl, x2 = ys;
and (7) vanish identically,
Eqs.
(6)
(5) and (8) yield (in vector notation
while Eqs.
as far as possible) $D(x12 + xz2) + V’(x, D(x,
A x2)’ -
V’[xlx,’
These equations
obviously
the momentum
density
A x2) = 0,
+ x2x2’ -
(9)
$(x1” + x~~)I] = 0.
contain the energy density, the Poynting
and the electromagnetic
It is evident that yi = Dx, in which case the reciprocity
E i,, yz = Dx, relations
PO) vector,
stress tensor. E f, also satisfy Eqs. (l),
yield
D(x, . i, + x2 - i2) + V’(x, A g2 -
x2 A il) = 0,
(11)
D(x, . i, - x1. i2) + V’(x, A ir, + x2 A X2) = 0,
(12)
D(x, A ii + x2 A ira)’ + V’ [Xi X2’ D(x,
A i,
-
x2i1’
+ 2,x,’
-
i,x,’
-
+ x,i,’
+ li2xg’ -
(x2. x1 -
x1. ir,)I] = 0, (13)
xl A g2)’
+ V’[X,%i’
+ i,x,’
(x1 * i,
+ x2 * $)I] = 0. (14)
24
J. HEADING
Obviously Eq.
Eq.
(11) is merely
(14) is the differential
Eqs.
(12) and
independent Broer satisfy
(13) reproduce
of Eqs.
certain
Differentiation
of Lipkin’s
a comma,
component
thus:
zilch forms
(9) and to time. that
are
yi = -
x2, YZ = xi, since these
zilch forms are produced
by this device.
with respect to x, y, or z will be denoted by
x, y, z respectively
,4 particular
of Eq.
(10) with respect
(11) and (14).
(l), but no further
Notation.
coefficient
of Eq.
[3] has used the substitutions
Eqs.
a suffix
the differential
coefficient
preceded
by a comma;
thus
axJay
= x~,~.
of a vector xi will be denoted by a suffix without
xiv, (x2 A x~)~. Hence a derivative
of a component
will
appear as xl?J,Z = I?,/&. It is evident that we may also substitute 91 =
yielding
forms similar
and x2 replaced 3. DEPENDENT
=
x2.z;
Yl = x1,%0
Yz =
%Y;
Yl = X1.U
Ya =
%!,z;
to Eqs.
Y2
(ll)-(14),
by derivatives
with the time derivatives
with respect
of equations
to sixteen
these represent
arises.
The four Eqs.
(11) and (14) are
when the x, y, and z-derivatives
all the first derivatives
are employed;
of the energy-momentum to sixteen
totally,
forms. yielding
forms of zilch.
To eliminate
any dependent
of zilch, it is sufficient densities
of xi
to X, y, z respectively.
The four Eqs. (12) and (13) are also augmented sixteen
relations
FORMS
A large number augmented
Xlm
into the reciprocity
will thereby
demanding
take care of themselves
at the most
The sixteen
forms existing
among these sixteen
to consider only the zilch densities. the extraction
zilch densities
in any linear combinations,
of irrelevant
solenoidal
vectors.
are xg *
x1
x1 -
x1.
k,,
(15)
x2
A X2,
(16)
-
Xl * x2.m
(1’)
-
Xl
(18)
A Ii, +
x2 * Xl x2
forms
The zilch flux
* x1.y
,z
* x2,9j,
GENERALIZED
ZILCH
AND
JORDAN
x2
to which for convenience
x l,z
*
verified
(19)
X2,?,
A x1x +
x‘2 A x2.m
Xl
A Xl,z/
+
x2
A x2,,,
(21)
XI
A x1.z
+
xz A x2.m
(22)
we shall append
vector
:
Xl.
~
25
FORM
Xl
(20)
the energy-momentum
(23)
A x;.
(24)
identity
for two vector
fields f and g is easily
f, divg + (f A fi,Jy - (f A a,,!, + (f A curld, - f. g,, = 0, and two further
similar
It is worth pointing subtracted
identities
out that
from Eq.
forms
B(Xl”+ xFz2), x1
The following
CANONICAL
obtained
by permuting
if f and g are interchanged
(25), we obtain
the x-component
(25)
the suffixes. and the result
of curl(f A g) in
the form
f,
-curl(f A g)], =
f
div g R . f,, -
This is, of course, identical [curl(f A g)], Formula
g, div f + (f A curl R)~ -
=
(25) represents,
(g A curl f)z
f . a.z.
with the more usual form
fz div
g - ,gTdiv f + (g . V)f, -
in effect,
a resolution
(f . V)g,.
of this last identity
into
two parts. If we first place f = g = xi and secondly f = g = x2 in (25), we obtain upon addition
the three identities
xlz div xi + x2, div x2 f
0(24),
-
(23),z = 0,
xly div x1 + xaY div xL?+ (20)z -
(22), ~ D(24),
-
(23),,
xiz div xi + xgz div xz + (21)p -
(20), -
where the numbers
(22), -
in parentheses
(al),
represent
-
D(24)z -
in Eq. (25) and subtract,
we obtain
(23),z = 0,
the equation
If now we first place f = x2, g = x1 and secondly
s 0,
so numbered.
f = x1 and g = x,
26
J. HEADING
xsZ div x1 -
xra: div x2 -
(IS),
-
(17) -
(24),,Z + (24),,,
= 0,
xsU div x1 -
xIV div xz -
(16), -
(18) -
(24),,,
+ (24),,,
= 0,
xgZ div x1 -
xIZ div x2 -
(16), -
(19) -
(24)2,y + (24),,,
= 0.
These six linear combinations zilch densities
reduce the possible number
of independent
to ten.
Moreover,
we note that
(20)= + (21), + (22), + x1 * curl x1 + x2 * curl x2 = 0, namely (20)s + (21), + (22)Z + (15) = 0, reducing
the number
The forms that
of independent
are more complicated more complicated equations
naturally
than Lipkin’s
forms.
to at most nine.
from reciprocity And Lipkin’s
relations
forms are also
than they need by the fact that a tensor
form of the
had been sought in order to see how the zilch densities
densities
transform
consideration, identity
zilch densities
we have derived
under
considerable
a Lorentz
for every variation
D [x,,(curl
transformation.
simplification of components
Apart
can be achieved
and flux from
this
by noticing
the
i and i:
x~)~ + x2j(curl x~)~] = D( - x~$.,~ + x~$~J
= - Xliji2j + X2jZli = - XliwYZi + X,jV%,, = since each xIi(curl
xJ3
component
sectionalization
of tne zilch densities given by Lipkin. linearly
in those derived
may be seen from the following
The x component, reexpressed
for example,
- x2jvx4,
V2$ = D2$.
the wave equation
+ xzj(curl x~)~ serves as a zilch density,
forms are included relations
satisfies
v . (XliVX,j
above
The fact that these from the reciprocity
argument.
of the zilch density
Eq.
as (XlhX =
%Xlr.z
l,z)z + -
(x2 AX2,r)r
XlPl2/,2 +
Hence
and forms, in fact, a
x2?+2z,z -
X2zG.fl.r
+
~21I~ZZ)~
(20) may be
GENERALIZED
an equation density. forms.
ZILCH
sufficient
Altogether,
AND
JORDAN
to show that densities
Missing combinations
these satisfy
CANONICAL
xlVxlZ,Z + xZU~Zz,eis a form of zilch
Eqs.
(20), (al),
and (22) yield eighteen
such
are forms such as xlIxIZ,Z + xa,~s+,~.
But
the trivial identities
there are in all nine such expressions. allowed for, and since xIi(curl we conclude
that Lipkin’s
-
= SC&S +
expressed
-
(X2v~2z),u
-
in terms
relations.
since -
is now
are embraced
linearly by
For example,
x&
&J,,
(%.~lz).a:
possible combination
x~)~ includes such expressions,
forms of zilch density
QV + xa,(curl
x21/,1/x2z-
Every
x~)~ + x,,(curl
those derived from the reciprocity xr,(curl
27
FORM
div x1 = 0
(~lV.1/~1* +
X2Y,YX2,) -
SC&,,
&,,,Z>
of part of (x1 A x~,~ + x2 A x~,~)~ and a three-diver-
gence. 4. THE GENERAL
Following
EQUATIONS
the previous paper by the writer
[2], we consider the n linear
equations curl wi = 2
aijDwj
(afj
real)
j=l
with the subsidiary
conditions
div wi -_ 0, for i = 1, 2,. . . , n.
tion to the Jordan
canonical
form with n vectors
variables
will yield
characteristic simultaneous
roots
n equations of the matrix
equations
aij is to be nonsingular
wholly aij
when repetitions
nonsimultaneous
are distinct,
The reduc-
zi as the transformed or may
when
n
yield simple
occur among the roots.
in this investigation.
the
Matrix
28
J. HEADING
In particular, root
-
we consider
4, such that
2 and .- q is, say, three. number
consistent
In Maxwell’s
the case when a root 2 occurs as well as a
the minimum with
equations,
of the two multiplicities
of the roots
We adopt the figure three as being the smallest perfect
clarity
the roots
for
immediate
are i and -
generalization.
i, so the figure
three is
reduced to one, and the analysis in this case gives no hint as to the process of generalization. We shall discuss
the case when the
Jordan
canonical
form implies
among others the equations curl 2-s =
qDz_, + Dz-,,
curl z_* =
qDz-,
+ Dzz,,
curl z-i =
qDz_,,
curl zi =
-
curl zs =
-
curl z3 = -
qDz,
qDz,
@z,, + Dz,,
+ Dz,,
namely a case when pure diagonalization
(26)
is not possible.
We are postulating
that at least one of ZQ or z4 must not occur associated or 4 respectively
in this set of simultaneous
we shall write these equations
equations.
In matrix
in the form:
,
0’3-3 = (- qD V’) ~1’3-2= (- qD
with the root -
0
-
z-3
-
z-3
q-12%2
+
gpz:z
7‘-3
8’)
0’3~ 3 (-
qD
V’)
0’3~ G (-
qD
V’)
0’3~ s (-
qD
V’)
0 ( Zl
-z1’
z, ) = 0
z, -
0, -
0
z3 - q-lzz
zz’ + q-121’ 7‘2
g-12, -
Z3’ + 4-12s’ Z3
= 0.
notation,
9
GENERALIZED
All the
3
ZILCH
matrices
JORDAN
CANONICAL
29
FORM
are defined to be skewsymmetric.
We have already that the product
AND
shown that the matrices
3r3_r
is symmetric,
yielding
3r and
3_1
commute,
the reciprocity
and
relation
q‘(313-I) = 0. This process may be generalized. It may easily be verified
that
0
(
313-Z - 323-l - 2q-l o
0
0
(
1
0
= 3-231 - 3432 - 2q-l 0 z_lzl’
&
i
’
0
0
313-3 - 323-2 + 333-l - 2 ( 0 q-yz1zL2 - z,z’_,) + q-2z1z:* 1 ’ 0
= 3-331 - 3-232 + 3-133 - 2 ( () q_yZ_eZ1, _ z_yz2,) + q_2z_1z1t1 . Moreover,
each of these left and right hand sides are symmetric
We now consider identities,
the four-divergence
using the operator
denote that an expression
q 0’).
(-
Again we use the suffix
is not to be differentiated.
0 to
We obtain
2q-f:
0’ [313_2 - 323-1 = 0’ 3,(3-do [
matrices.
of the left hand sides of these
- 32(3-do - 2q- l c:
z,(z~l)~l
~z,~:LI’ %?%I -3-1(32)0 - 2P-
+ 0’ (31)03-z - (32)03-I - 2q- l6 [
(271
= 0, since V’z, = V’z_, = 0. Similarly
33-3
This result is a second reciprocity
a third reciprocity
- 323-2 + 3334 - 2
relation
0
relation.
is given by
0
I 0 q-1(z1zL2 - z2z_1) + q-2z,zLl
I
=
0.
J. HEADING
30 Explicit purpose. involve (28).
evaluation
of these products
We shall consider the explicit
is not necessary
the reciprocity
matrices
densities
for our present
only, which do not
shown on the right of expressions
In order, these densities
(27) and
are zi’z-1, z,z-,,
Zi’Z-s -
z,z_,
zs’z-1 + 2q-lz,‘z_,,
- z,z_,
+ qpz,z_,,
Zl’Z_g - z2’z_2 + 23’2-1 + 2q-l(z,‘z_, z,z_, The structure
- z,z_,
+ z,z_,
- zz’z-1) + q-221’2-1,
+ q-yz,z_,
- Z,z_,).
of these forms shows that they may be combined
to yield the simple equivalent
reciprocity
densities
(in vector
linearly notation)
z1 * z-1,
z1 A z-1, z1 * z-2 - z2 * z-1, z1 A z-2 - z2 A z-1, Zl’ Z-Q - Q.‘Z_2 + z,hz_,
It
must be realized
densities.
that
Real and imaginary
when the complex operator be rearranged imaginary 5.
-
z2 AZ-,
Z3'Z_l,
+
z3
(29)
AZ-,.
these are complex
reciprocity
relations
and
parts can only be taken of the four divergence
(-
0’) is used. But these can immediately
qD
in order to yield densities
that
are merely
the real and
parts of forms (29).
GENERALIZED
ENERGY
AND
ZILCH
The canonical form for the matrix transformation
relating
transformation
as
A G (a,$) is achieved
the w’s to the z’s.
by a nonsingular
We shall write the inverse
n zv = c
b,,w,,
complex
numbers
q=1
where the b,, are in general
although
the aSj are real.
GENERALIZED
ZILCH
AND
Using the summation
CANONICAL
convention,
~1 =
where distinct
JORDAN
solutions
31
FORM
we may write
bi,x,,
z-1 = L,y,>
(39)
x, and yn are taken for the w,.
In the second place, we may also take ZI
=
z_~
by,,
Two forms of reciprocity
density
If in particular identical,
arise for
we choose ya =
x,,
these reciprocity
,v denotes
x, y or z respectively,
differentiation
independent
the difference
is skewsymmetric, of construction
(32). These definitions
we may substitute
blpb_-lrxa,v *
x,.
The sum of
and the number
-
of these two forms, W-&a
of
(34)
zilch density.
while that appearing ensures
that
namely
* xr.w
Eq.
The square
matrix
in
in Eq. (32) is symmetric;
(34) is independent
of Eq.
agree with the simpler ones adopted in our treatment
equations.
The same ideas hold for all twelve forms (29). yield the reciprocity Lb--lrxa density.
(32)
. XT,,.
forms has not been doubled by this device.
and we define this to be a complex
leading
is
(33)
(32), so they are not independent,
(b&i,
of Maxwell’s
t,
density
relations
Similarly
blnb_lrxp * x,,,, and secondly
We also consider
this method
to either
z-i = b_i,x,,
zi = bipxg,w,
z1 A z._~
become
z-1 = b--lpxq,v,
smce yp. E x~,~ satisfies the original equations.
firstly
+ V-&,
into the reciprocity
zi = bi,x,,
respect
of the energy
* x,,, = hb-1,
But we may also substitute
these forms is Eq.
with
then the first derivative
W-1rxq.v . x, + bd-+q
brackets
densities
and the result is known as an energy density, namely blab_lrxq - x,.
If the notation
yielding
(31) namely
z1 . z_~,
blPb--lrxT. yp.
and
bi&-irxa . yr
b-lpx,.
=
Thus the three forms
densities A ~7
and
bi,b-i,y,
A x7,
to blpb_lrxa A x, when yn G x,, a generalization The derivative
of momentum-
of this form is (b&i,
-
W--lJxu
A x,,,.
(35)
32
J. HEADING
But when we substitute
Addition
Eqs. (30) and (31), we obtain the densities
yields Eq. (35), while subtraction (b&-i,
an independent
+ bi+-ia)xg
A x,,,,
form that must also be described
When the operator
(-
gD
from the real and imaginary the vanishing
yields
as a zilch density.
V’) is applied, 4 being complex, parts
of the resulting
of the four-divergence,
parts of the complex zilch density
that
that
some of these contributions
the number
ninety-six
of real zilch
being produced
But the following matrix complex
number.
resolution.
certain
namely
A E (Q),
when
with the other forms
In the case of Maxwell’s but in general
is doubled
4, q, q, -
q, - q, -
q is complex,
since
the characteristic
it follows that q*, q*, q*, -
a second
associated Then
set of equations
the complex similar
another
whole set (29) is repeated Consider the matrix
complex
to set (26).
equation
Let
Hence
there
the variables
by 3-s, 3-s, 3-i, 3i, 3s, 3a.
reciprocity
density;
in fact,
the
with these new variables.
T that transforms
B into canonical
where
‘q10
J=
a
q*, - q*, - q* are
conjugate.
with this second set of roots be denoted
3i’ * 3_1 forms
of the
process may take place upon
denotes
exists
equation
q, where q is generally
also roots,
a star
it appears resolution,
show how this must be interpreted.
possesses real coefficients, where
by this
roots of the characteristic
If q is real, this doubling
But
by
from the set (29).
arguments
We are considering
vanish,
densities
it follows formed
both the real and imaginary
Eq. (34) (together
in set (29)) can be regarded as real zilch densities. equations,
equation
0 Q 1 0 0 4 ...
\
.**
... ...
-q
0
...
1
...
0
--4
0 0
1
--4j
form C, namely
GENERALIZED
ZILCH
AND
The first six columns
JORDAN
CANONICAL
in T are associated
33
FORM
with the first six columns
in
the identity
AT = TC, namely with the elements of J. The second six columns are associated with J*, and since A is real it follows that the second
six columns
are the conjugates
In the inverse
zi in terms of the wi (taken bij previously cofactors
of the first six columns
transformation,
used.
the elements
providing
the vectors
the coefficients
bij consist of the transposed
of T.
Let [T,; denote the column consisting of T.
respectively.
expresses
T-l
to be real), thereby
Essentially,
of the elements
the matrix
of the cofactors
of the jth column
Then
z_~ = [T,]‘w,
[T,]‘w,
z-3 =
Now the cofactors
appearing
perhaps a minus sign appended; the columns
in
[T,] and
[T,] are conjugates,
with
this may easily be checked by considering
used in the formation
[T3] and [T,] are conjugates,
3_3= [T,]‘w,. . . .
.. ,
of the cofactors
involved.
Similarly,
and so on.
Hence zl-rzl = w’[T,]‘[T,]w, and
31131 = w’[T,]‘[T,,]w It
follows
resolution
that
z:rzr
into
real
and 3Lr3r
a w’[T3*]‘[T4*]w.
are proportionally
and imaginary
parts
conjugates,
of equations
so the
involving
these
(and all) densities totally does not double the number of equations produced. The set of densities the corresponding set
(29) yields
independence
(29) yields forty-eight
conjugate
ninty-six,
while
or otherwise
complex
set yields a further the
conjugate
zilch relations,
forty-eight.
set is disregarded.
of this set of zilch equations
and
Otherwise, must
The now be
investigated. 6. DEPENDENT
AND INDEPENDENT
FORMS OF ZILCH
We may first consider the first four forms occurring the derived energy densities
zi . z- 1.2)+ z1.v. z- 1 f zrhz-
in set (29), yielding
and the zilch densities
qz1 . z_l)/av,
i,V + z1.w A z-1 = +1
A Z-l)/%
(36/J (37/V)
34
J. HEADING
Zl ’ z-1.v -
z1 A Ll,v there being sixteen
complex
-
Zl,vZ-1,
(38,J
z1.v AZ-,,
W/J
zilch densities
in forms (38) and (39).
We first place f = zi, g = z_i in identity g =
zl, where zi and z_, are both expressed
Bearing
in mind that the divergence
(25), and secondly
f = z_~,
in terms of the same fields w.
of all vectors z vanishes, we have upon
addition (39,,),
-
(39,,),
with two similar equations, (37/J, with two similar
-
+ 4(37/J,
-
(38,x) = 9,
(49)
and upon subtraction (37,,),
equations.
+ 4(39/,)x -
In general,
(38,,)
= 9,
(41)
twelve relations
the zilch forms when resolved into real and imaginary
exist
between
parts.
We also note the identities
(~1A z-dr
+ (zl A ~-~.~h,+ (zl A z-~.~)~= = -
(z-1A ZI.& + (x1 A zdv + (z-1A z~,~hAddition
qzl.
Dz-,,
z-1 * curl ~1 = qcl
* Dzl.
yields (39,e)z + (39,,),
and subtraction
the former alone referring relations.
+ 4(38/J - 9,
+ (37,&
+ q(36,,)
to zilch, implying
Hence the thirty-two
and (39) are reduced different
+ (39,,),
(42)
yields (37,,)0 + (37,,),
- 9,
generally
a further
real zilch densities derivable
at most to eighteen.
The conjugate
two real
from Eqs. (38) set leads to no
conclusions.
When
the pair of characteristic
case of Maxwell’s conjugate zi = bl,x,, sixteen
z1 * curl zF1
equations),
set exists.
For example,
z_~ = b_l,xr,
complex
roots
special
when q = f
is necessary
(as in the since no
icr (IX real), we note that
and under these circumstances
zilch densities
b_l, = b:,
so the
(38) and (39) become
(b,,b:- b,,bl*,)x, . x,,,, the first bracket
are pure imaginary
consideration
being pure imaginary
(h&i + b,,bl*,)x, A XT,,,, and the second
real.
There
are
GENERALIZED
therefore set.
ZILCH
AND
JORDAN
only sixteen real zilch densities,
The number
of independent
When CJ= f
The elements
reduces at most to nine.
essentially
contains
occurring
and their
respective
columns
from the other characteristic
must be either
of cofactors roots.
real or pure imaginary,
This means
the product
zi . z_~ must be either real or pure imaginary. there
nine independent
can be only sixteen
that
and it follows that
strates
that
conjugate
z1 = [T,]‘w,
consisting
each cofactor
arising
the cofactors
35
with no corresponding
densities
[T,]‘w,
of [T,],
in T, are such that conjugates
FORM
u (R real), we may take, as before z__~=
say.
CANONICAL
zilch densities,
This demon-
again reducing
to
forms.
We must finally the zilch densities
discuss the remaining
derived
therefrom.
reciprocity
densities
We may restrict
(29) and
the discussion
to
the forms zi
* z-
2.v
+
Zl,v
* z-62
-
z1 A z_L?.V+ zl,V A z-2 zr * zz1 A zthe latter
and combining. express
term
Eq.
2.v
-
-
z1.v
z1.u
equivalent
* z-1.v
-
z2.v.
z2 A z_l.v -
* z-2
-
z2 * z-1.u
A z-2
-
~2 A z-1.9
two forms giving sixteen
The identities
that
2.v
z2
complex
+
z2,v
z2.u
+
z-19
(43/V)
A z-1,
(44/J (45,lJ)
* z-1,
z2.u
(46/g)
A z-1,
zilch densities.
to Eqs. (40) and (41) are obtained
f = zi,
g = z-7,;
f = z-2,
g = z,;
f = z.2,
g = z-r;
f = z-1,
g=z,;
by placing
Since curl z_s and curl z2 now enter the identities,
these curls in terms
(37).
Totally,
of the time derivatives
we obtain
for the
identity
-
+ (37,,),
Eqs. (26)
yield an extra corresponding
to
Eq. (40): (46,,), The other
identities
-
(46~)s + q(44,& are similarly
modified,
unaltered
that at most only eighteen
contained
in the set Eqs.
In
all, the
densities conjugate
ninty-six
(43,,)
= 0.
but the conclusion
independent
remains
real zilch densities
are
(43)-(46). zilch
densities
(29) reduce to fifty-four set exists, the forty-eight
at most.
produced
from
the
reciprocity
In the special cases when no
zilch densities
reduce to twenty-seven,
36
J. HEADING
Considering
the whole set of characteristic
A, we may draw an overall conclusion. yields in the Jordan
canonical
form submatrices
there arise at most 1%~ or Qn independent
18n is used when there disregarded conjugate
(namely,
exists
zilch densities,
a conjugate
where
set, with the conjugate Qn is used
set
when
a
set does not exist (a = 0 or b = 0).
A possesses
at least
number of independent
exists only under the condition
one pair of characteristic
for every pair of submatrices
sections 4, 5 and 6 have shown how these zilch densities may be systematically
calculated.
REFERENCES
1 D. M. Lipkin, J. Math. B. Kibble,
Phys.
J. Math.
6(1964),
Phys.
3 L. J.. F. Broer, Physica 38(1968), 4 J. Heading,
Linear
Algebra
Received October 7977
roots
*
that the q.
The
zilch densities is at most equal to the sum of these
values of 1% or 9% respectively,
2 T. W.
& q that
of the form
q = a + ib, a # 0, b # 0) ;
Zilch derived from reciprocity matrix
roots of the original matrix
For every pair of roots
696-700.
6(1965),
1022-1026.
341-348.
2(1969),
413-425.
(47), and
and flux densities