Genetically identified complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a normal fetus following IVF-ET

Genetically identified complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a normal fetus following IVF-ET

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL COLLEGES OF PLA Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmcpla Genetically identified comple...

493KB Sizes 13 Downloads 93 Views

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL COLLEGES OF PLA Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

www.elsevier.com/locate/jmcpla

Genetically identified complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a normal fetus following IVF-ET☆ Sui Jianzhong, Sun Xiaofang* Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Genetics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510150, China Received 19 May 2009; accepted 09 October 2009

Abstract A complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a fetus following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF–ET) is a rare event. The diagnosis is often not easy because of the morphological similarity to a partial mole, but important to the treatment. We present a recent case in which STR polymorphism analysis clearly revealed a different genetic origin for the fetal and molar parts. STR polymorphisms on 15 variable number tandem repeat loci and a gender-determination locus, which were detected by polymerase chain reaction, indicating that the cord/placenta and molar tissue were parental and androgenous, respectively. During follow-up, the patient developed persistent gestational trophoblastic tumor (GTT) which was successfully treated with chemotherapy. In this case, STR polymorphism analysis exactly diagnosed a twin pregnancy consisting of a complete hydatidiform mole and a fetus. Keywords: STR; Complete hydatidiform mole; In vitro fertilization; Twin pregnancy

1. Introduction

chromosomes), and complete hydatidiform mole (CHM), in which the karyotype is diploid (46 chromosomes).

A twin pregnancy coexisting of a complete hydati-

Although a complete mole in a twin pregnancy is rare, it’s

diform mole (CHM) and a fetus is rare, with an

reported that the malignant potential of CHM is higher

incidence of 1 per 22,000–100,000 pregnancies [1].

than that of a partial hydatidiform mole[4]. It is thus

Two types are described[2,3]: partial hydatidiform mole

important to distinguish a complete mole in a twin

(PHM), in which there is a triploid karyotype (69

pregnancy from a partial mole. However, it is difficult and inaccurate to diagnose a complete hydatidiform mole by



Supported by Production and Rresearch Projects of Guangdong

ultrasono-graphy, macroscopic findings and pathological

Province (2007B090400140).

examination, because of the morphological similarity to

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected](Sun X.)

a partial mole,particularly in cases where coexisting

Sui Jianzhong et al. / Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

fetus is aborted at an early stage of gestation.

361

IU/L. X-ray examination showed none of lung metastases.

Recently, DNA polymorphism analysis makes it

After counseling with the couple, it was decided to

possible to diagnose a twin molar pregnancy by

terminate the pregnancy. Dilatation and evacuation was

identifying different genetic origins for molar and fetal

performed on the patient at 15 weeks. Macroscopically,

tissue, androgenous for molar tissue and normal

there was a normal female fetus, a normal placenta(Fig. 2),

biparental for a fetus[5]. In the present paper, we report

and a large molar mass with typical grape-like vesicles

an unusual twin pregnancy with complete H-mole and a

measured 152 mm×75 mm×148 mm (Fig. 3). Pathologic

coexisting fetus following IVF–ET diagnosed by STR

examination showed a complete hydatidiform mole

polymorphism analysis. This woman was evacuated at

coexisting with a normal fetus (Fig. 4).

15 weeks of gestation. However, about one month after delivery, she developed a persistent GTT that required Etoposide (VP-16) –diamminedichloroplatinum (DDP) chemotherapy to achieve complete remission.

2. Case report A 33-year-old Chinese woman, gravida 2, parous 0, with one previous spontaneous abortion, had undergone

Fig. 1. Ultrasonography of complete hydatidiform mole and

in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF–ET), and

surviving coexistent at 15 weeks of gestation.

transferred two embryos in the uterus. Five weeks later, a positive fetal heart and a poorly defined sac was outlined, identified on transvaginal ultrasound. At 9 weeks

the

patient

had

another

ultrasonographic

examination because of vaginal bleeding, that revealed a living fetus with normal fetal heart beat; however, there was a subchorionic echogenic lesion sized by 113 mm×52 mm. She was thought to be at risk of threatened abortion, and advised to have absolute bed rest and close

Fig. 2. The delivered fetus with normal placenta.

follow-up. At the 15th week of gestation, the patient complained of sustained vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and vomiting. An ultrasound scan showed a normal fetus of the 15th week of gestation coexisted with a suspicious subchorionic hematoma sized 95 mm×115 mm×28 mm, and a very large cystic mass measured 150 mm×76 mm×146 mm (Fig. 1), all of which was consistent with CHM. The serum level of human chorionic gonadotrophins (hCG) was >1000000

Fig.3. Molar tissue with obvious grape-like pattern.

362

Sui Jianzhong et al. / Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

Fig. 4. Complete hydatidiform mole. Villi have extensive stromal edema with central cistern and a circumferential proliferation of trophoblast.

Fig.5A, Fig.5B: DNA fingerprinting of parents and mole. Fig.5C: DNA fingerprinting of fetus. Table 1 Genotypes of the parents, fetus and molar tissue Sample

Father

information

Mother

Fetus

Mole

Origin

D8S1179

10

14

10

12

10

14

10

10

D21S11

29

31

29

33.2

29

31

31

31

D7S820

10

10

10

12

10

10

10

10

CSF1PO

12

12

9

12

9

12

12

12

D3S1358

17

17

17

18

17

17

17

17

TH01

7

9

6

9

6

7

7

7

*, #

D13S317

10

12

8

10

10

10

12

12

#

D16S539

12

13

11

11

11

12

13

13

*, #

D2S1338

21

24

18

20

18

24

24

24

*, #

D19S433

13

14.2

15.2

16.2

13

16.2

14.2

14.2

*, #

vWA

14

17

17

18

14

17

14

14

#

TPOX

8

11

11

11

8

11

11

11

D18S51

14

15

14

16

14

15

15

15

AMEL

X

Y

X

X

X

X

X

X

D5S818

8

11

11

11

11

11

8

8

#

FGA

23

23

22

24

23

24

23

23

*, #

Fetal DNA showed bi-parental origin (*) and molar DNA showed paternal origin (#).

#

#

363

Sui Jianzhong et al. / Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

In addition to the pathological examination, STR-

3. Discussion

derived DNA polymorphism analysis clarified the paternity of the fetus and molar tissue (Fig.5A, Fig.5B,

We can analyze the mechanisms of hydatidiform

Fig.5C). Genomic DNA extracted from the fetus, molar

mole (HM) by molecular methods[6], with it divided

tissue and parental peripheral blood leukocytes was

into complete and partial hydatidiform mole. The most

amplified with 15 variable number tandem repeat loci

usual mechanism of CHM is the fusion of a spermatic

and a gender-determination marker using a commer-

haploid genome and an empty ovocyte (i.e., one in

cially released kit for personal identification (Amp

which the egg nucleus is absent or inactivated),

FISTR Identifiler Kit, Applied Biosystems, USA) (Table

followed by duplication of the spermatic haploid

1). DNA was amplified under the following conditions:

genome to obtain 46 chromosomes. The chromosomes

polymerase activation at 95℃ for 11 min, followed by

of each pair are identical; the mole is said to be

28 cycles of 1 min at 94℃, 1 min at 59℃, 1 min at

homozygous and the karyotype is always 46,XX. The

72℃ and extension for 60 min at 60℃. A Genetic

second mechanism, an empty egg is fertilized by two

Analyzer 3100 was used for fragment analysis and the

sperm. In this case the mole is said to be heterozygous

data were further analyzed using Genescan 3.1 and

and the karyotype can be either 46,XX or 46,XY[7].

Genotyper 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems, CA,

Partial moles derive from dispermic fertilization of a

USA). The 15 polymorphic STR loci were examined

haploid normal oocyte and produce a triploid set of

and 10 were found to be informative. There were 5 loci

chromosomes.

of fetus DNA showed biparental alleles and was

The use of ovulation-inducing drugs such as

confirmed as biparental in origin (Table 1,*). Molar

clomiphene citrate or gonadotrophin (HMG or FSH)

DNA is all of paternal origin. In addition, all molar

has raised the concern that these women may be at

alleles were homozygous. This result confirmed that the

increased risk of cancer. It is expected that, with the

molar tissue derived from monospermic androgenesis

increase in the utilization of ovulation induction

(Table 1, #). The STR results confirmed that this was a

therapy, the rate of multiple gestations containing

case of a complete hydatidiform mole coexisting with a

hydatidiform mole will rise, and the overall risk of

fetus.

developing persistent GTT may be increased[8]. In

Postoperatively, serum ß-hCG level showed a

addition, the risk of developing persistent GTT in CHM

steady fall. However, about one month after delivery,

is higher (12–20%) than in partial mole (4%) [9,10].

when the patient revisited, and at that time we found

Although

the level of ß-hCG was still high, up to 14335 IU/L. We

coexisting with a fetus following IVF-ET developed

suspected persistent gestational trophoblastic tumor

into persistent GTT, which was the case in our patient.

(GTT), and decided to administer one cycle of

It is important to distinguish between complete and

Etoposide (VP-16)- diamminedichloroplatinum(DDP)

partial moles because the malignant potential is four

chemotherapy. Chest X-ray found that pulmonary

times higher in patients with a complete hydatidiform

metastasis was normal. Four cycles after Etoposide

mole than in patients with a partial hydatidiform

(VP-16)- diamminedichloroplatinum(DDP) chemo-

mole[11]. Further more, although a triploid fetus in a

therapy, ß-hCG level was normalized, and no further

partial hydatidiform mole has no chance of survival, a

problems followed.

fetus coexisting with a complete hydatidiform mole in a

rare,

a

complete

hydatidiform

mole

364

Sui Jianzhong et al. / Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

twin pregnancy may survive[12].

TH01, D13S317, D16S539, D2S1338, D19S433, vWA,

It was reported that STR-derived DNA polymorphism

TPOX, D18S51, D5S818, FGA, and the Amel locus on

analysis was a useful and accurate molecular method to

chromosomes X and Y) and represents the largest

diagnose CHM[13]. In this case, 15 variable number

number of such validated cases. The high number of

tandem repeat loci and a gender–determination locus

loci tested simultaneously saved time and was helpful

were used, and the result showed that fetal DNA was

in cases with partial allelic profiles secondary to DNA

biparental in origin, but molar DNA was all of paternal

degradation.

origin, indicating that this case was twin pregnancy. The

As we all know, conventional diagnostic methods

molar DNA confirmed as monospermic androgenesis and

including ultrasonography, macroscopic findings and

DNA ploidy analysis of molar tissue showed diploid

pathological examination were inadequate for accurate

karyotype (46, XX), typical of a CHM. These findings

diagnosis of hydatidiform mole, even when these

confirmed that this molar tissue was derived from a

measures

CHM. Inversely, the fetal DNA was biparental, and

polymorphism analysis is a fast, convenient and

DNA ploidy was also diploid type (46, XX). These

accurate molecular method, could be used for the

findings suggested that it was a normal fetus. Thus, this

diagnosis of hydatidiform mole, especially for CHM

case was finally diagnosed as twin pregnancy with

with a co-existing fetus, and become a standard

CHM coexisting with a normal fetus following IVF-ET.

diagnostic method.

Although

the

natural

clinical

course

were

combined.

STR-derived

DNA

and

appropriate management of twin pregnancy with

References

complete hydatidiform mole and a coexisting fetus are limited due to the rarity of this phenomenon, in the

1.

cases which received treatment for infertility, like the present case, the termination of pregnancy should be

Jones WB, Lauersen NH. Hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122(3): 267.

2.

Niikawa N, Merotto E, Kajii T. Origin of acrocentric

decided very carefully considering the patient’s wants,

trisomies in spontaneous abortuses. Hum Genet 1977;

clinical status, and laboratory findings. It has been

40(1): 73.

suggested that serially decreasing serum ß-hCG levels

3.

Vassilakos P, Riotton G, Kajii T. Hydatidiform mole: two

and normal fetal karyotype without any serious clinical

entities. A morphologic and cytogenetic study with some

complications

clinical consideration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;

are

requirements

for

expectant

management[14,15]. Also, it might be necessary to follow up the patients carefully for possible progression

127(2): 167. 4.

Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Current management of

of persistent or metastatic GTT after termination,

complete and partial molar pregnancy. J Reprod Med

because the risk of progression is high in these cases.

1994; 39(3): 139.

It is worth mentioning that DNA microsatellite

5.

Marcorelles P, Audrezet MP, Le Bris MJ, et al. Diagnosis

polymorphism has been used to resolve diagnostic

and outcome of complete hydatidiform mole coexisting

dilemmas centered on hydatidiform mole(HM)in our

with a live twin fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

laboratory, this study applied a commercially available

2005; 118(1): 21.

kit, PowerPlex16, that simultaneously tests 16 STR loci (D8S1179, D21S11, D7S820, CSF1PO, D3S1358,

6.

Ishii J, Iitsuka Y, Takano H, et al. Genetic differentiation of complete hydatidiform moles coexisting with normal

365

Sui Jianzhong et al. / Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 24 (2009) 360–365

fetuses by short tandem repeat-derived deoxyribonucleic

postmolar trophoblastic disease after partial molar

acid polymorphism analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;

pregnancy. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 48(2): 165.

179(3 pt 1): 628. 7.

Vuong PN, Guillet JL, Houissa-Vuong S, et al. Pathology

possibilities in hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus.

of gestational trophoblastic tumors. Gynecol Obstet

Obstet Gynecol Surv 1991; 46(9): 577.

Fertil 2000; 28(12): 913. 8.

9.

12. Vejerslev LO. Clinical management and diagnostic

13. Wax JR, Pinette MG, Chard R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis

Petignat P, Vassilakos P, Campana A. Are fertility drugs a

by DNA polymorphism analysis of complete mole with

risk factor for persistent trophoblastic tumour? Hum

coexisting twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188(4):

Reprod 2002;17(6): 1610.

1105.

Steller MA, Genest DR, Bernstein MR, et al. Clinical

14. Suzuki M, Matsunobu A, Wakita K, et al. Hydatidiform

features of multiple conception with partial or complete

mole with a surviving coexisting fetus. Obstet Gynecol

molar pregnancy and coexisting fetuses. J Reprod Med

1980; 56(3):384–388.

1994; 39(3): 147. 10. Bristow RE, Shumway JB, Khouzami AN, et al. Complete hydatidiform mole and surviving coexistent

15. Thomas EJ, Pryce WI, Matlby EL, et al. The prospective management of a coexistent hydatidiform mole and fetus. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 27(4):343.

twin. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996; 51(12): 705. 11. Goto S, Yamada A, Ishizuka T, et al. Development of

(Editor Lu Renmin)