Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by micronucleus test and comet assay

Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by micronucleus test and comet assay

Accepted Manuscript Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by micronucleus test and comet assay Guom...

10MB Sizes 1 Downloads 78 Views

Accepted Manuscript Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by micronucleus test and comet assay

Guoming Zeng, Maolan Zhang, Pu Wang, Xiang Li, Pei Wu, Da Sun PII:

S0045-6535(18)32256-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.148

Reference:

CHEM 22632

To appear in:

Chemosphere

Received Date:

02 October 2018

Accepted Date:

23 November 2018

Please cite this article as: Guoming Zeng, Maolan Zhang, Pu Wang, Xiang Li, Pei Wu, Da Sun, Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by micronucleus test and comet assay, Chemosphere (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2018.11.148

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species by

2

micronucleus test and comet assay

3

Guoming Zeng* 1, Maolan Zhang*2,Pu Wang3,Xiang Li 1,Pei Wu1 , Da Sun4,

4

1Guoming

5

2Maolan

6

1Xiang

7

1Pei

8

3Chongqing

9

4Institute

Zeng ,Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chong Qing, P. R. China,401331

Zhang *,Sichuan University of Science and Engineering,Si Chuan, P. R. China, 643000

Li ,Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chong Qing, P. R. China, 401331

Wu,Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chong Qing, P. R. China, 401331 University, Chong Qing, P. R. China, 400044;

of Life Sciences & Biomedicine Collaborative Innovation Center, Wenzhou University,

10

Wenzhou, P. R. China,325000

11

These two authors contributed equally to this work.

12

*Corresponding

13

R. China, 643000, [email protected],+86 18708392487;

14

Guoming Zeng ,Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chong Qing, P. R.

15

China,401331,[email protected],+86 13996471404;

16

Abstract: Algal blooms and toxins have become serious ecological problems. White-rot fungi have

17

been demonstrated to be a feasible means of control, but the genotoxicity mechanisms involved have

18

not been reported. In this study, Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083,

19

and Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 were co-cultured with Phanerochaete chrysosporium

20

under optimal conditions of 250 mg-l at 25 °C with DO 7.0 mg-l for 1, 3, 5 and 7 d.Compared to the

21

control groups, the values for tadpoles exposed to algae treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium

22

were only increased from 1.95±0.09, 2.78±0.08 and 2.37±0.13 to 2.45±0.07, 3.56±0.08 and 2.54±0.10,

author:Maolan Zhang *,Sichuan University of Science and Engineering,Si Chuan, P.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 23

and the frequency of nuclear anomalies reached 6.45±0.06, 11.14±0.05 and 7.85±0.10 to 7.68±0.08,

24

13.12±0.06 and 8.57±0.12 in the experimental groups after 7 d. What’s more, the tail lengths were only

25

increased to 36.77±0.54, 41.58±0.78 and 35.38 ± 0.66, and the comet length reached 55.67±0.68,

26

68.56±0.85 and 51.43±0.82 . The results demonstrated that Phanerochaete chrysosporium effectively

27

decreased genotoxicity effects in Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles. These results could provide new ideas

28

for inhibiting water blooms, and lay a theoretical foundation for promoting the deepening of water

29

eutrophication.

30

Keywords:Algal bloom;Phanerochaete chrysosporium;Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles; Genotoxicity;

31

1.Introduction

32

Algal blooms, characterized by abnormal reproduction of algae and other aquatic organisms in

33

aquatic ecosystems, are one of the most serious environmental problems in lakes, reservoirs and other

34

natural bodies of water(Campbell et al.,2011;Su et al., 2007). These blooms not only deteriorate water

35

quality, block aquatic organism physiological development and damage the structure of aquatic

36

ecosystems, they also destroy the function of bodies of water and the ecological environment (Acero et

37

al.,2005;Zamyadi et al.,2012;Zong et al.,2013). In addition, blooms seriously affect the utilization of

38

water resources for industry, agriculture, aquaculture and water transportation, and a variety of toxins

39

are released during algae growth that can be detrimental to animals, plants and humans.

40

Micronucleus(MCN) (Ai et al.,1995;Çavas et al.,2011;Ma et al.,2011) is a form of chromosomal

41

aberration that can be used to monitor pollution through the observation of the rate of occurrence of

42

cell micronuclei in plant and animal tissues. This technique has been widely used in environmental

43

monitoring, tumor formation and chemical evaluation. The comet assay (Crasta et al.,2012;Jackson et

44

al.,2009;Lavelle et al.,2002) can be used for the quantitative determination of DNA damage at the

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 45

single-cell level, and it is suitable for monitoring genetic damage. Moreover, the amphibian larval

46

tadpoles are susceptible to the influence of their surroundings for their own physiological and structural

47

characteristics, such as amphibians and bare skin. When the concentration of poisons in water reaches a

48

certain level or the pollution lasts to a certain period, amphibians will show a series of poisoning

49

symptoms, including abnormal behavior, physiological disorders, histopathological changes and even

50

death.Therefore, it is very sensitive to environmental pollution and as model animal to study the

51

toxicity effects(Smith, 2001).

52

White-rot fungi (Han et al.,2011;Jia et al.,2010;Zeng et al.,2015) can degrade or decrease various

53

environmental pollutants, including dyes, lignin, and toxic wastes, and previous studies have indicated

54

that a suppressive effect on algal species can be caused by white-rot fungi secretions during co-

55

incubation.However,Some algae-lysing microorganisms can produce endotoxins or exotoxins,and the

56

biological toxins would be released in the process of algae cell death (Hashimoto et al.,2009), which

57

posed a serious threat to the safety of water. Therefore, the toxicity of the algae-control system of white

58

rot fungi determined whether the algae-control system of white rot fungi can be successfully and safely

59

applied to the treatment of eutrophic water .Although the antioxidant response in white-rot fungi

60

(Xie et al., 2016;Huang et al., 2017) have reported, the genotoxicity effects of algal species co-cultured

61

with white-rot fungi have not been investigated.

62

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the genotoxicity effects of Phanerochaete

63

chrysosporium on three algal species in Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles using the MCN test and comet

64

assay and provide a reference for controlling algal blooms.

65

2. Materials and methods

66

2.1 Algal strains and cultivation

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 67

Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083, and Scenedesmus

68

quadricauda FACHB-507 were provided by the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection of the Chinese

69

Academy of Sciences. All strains were maintained in an illuminated incubator for 15 d at 25 °C on a 12

70

h/12 h light/dark cycle with approximately 90 µmol photons m−2s−1 provided by cool-white fluorescent

71

lamps to achieve exponential growth. The growth media used for three algal were described in Tables

72

1,2, and 3, respectively.

73



74



75



76

2.2 Fungal strains

77

Phanerochaete chrysosporium was provided by the Center of Industrial Culture Collection, China.

78

The strain was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates for 5 d, stored at 4 °C, and then

79

subcultured every month. Batch liquid tests were conducted in 5000-ml beakers containing 250 mg dry

80

weight of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Controls throughout the experiments were the same cultures

81

as the test groups but without Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

82

2.3 Animal experimental design

83

Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles were collected from the Chongqing farmland suburbs and

84

placed in a no-pollution eco-pond (27-28 °C). Healthy tadpoles with uniform size were selected at stage

85

32-36, and their body length and weight were 26.28 ± 0.34 mm and 0.19 ± 0.019 g, respectively.

86

Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles were fed the three algae and the algae treated with Phanerochaete

87

chrysosporium under optimal conditions for Phanerochaete chrysosporium 250 mg-l at DO 7.0 mg-l

88

with 25 °C and 12:12 h (light:dark) cycle for 1, 3, 5 and 7 d, respectively. The concentration of

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 89

chlorophyll-a were 185 mgL-1,192 mgL-1and 187 mgL-1,respectively.Controls throughout the

90

experiments were the same cultures as the test groups but without Phanerochaete chrysosporium. All

91

experiments were conducted in triplicate.

92

2.4. Analytical methods

93

2.4.1. MCN test

94

The surface of the tadpoles was dried with filter paper, cut the tail by sterilized scalpel and the

95

tail blood used to make blood smears. The blood was allowed to dry naturally and fixed with methanol

96

for 15 min. Wright stain was applied for 15-20 min and washed with PBS (pH 6.8). Finally, the smears

97

were dyed for 25 min with Gimsa solution, washed with deionized water three times, and allowed to

98

dry naturally for observation by microscope. A total of 1000 cells were observed in each blood smear,

99

and the number of micronuclei and abnormal nuclei were recorded.All experiments were conducted in

100

triplicate.

101

2.4.2. Comet assay

102

The alkaline version of the comet assay was performed according to guidelines proposed by

103

Singh(Singh et al.,1988). The heads of Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles were removed, and blood cells

104

were collected and diluted in PBS (pH 6.8) to a cell density of 105-106. Blood cells were used directly

105

for the comet assay. The buffer containing blood cells was transferred into a 2-ml centrifuge tube.

106

Completely frosted microscopic slides were covered with 90 µl 0.7% normal melting agarose (NMA)

107

to form a thin layer and allowed to solidify at 4 °C for 30 min. Low Melting Point Agarose (LMA, 75

108

µl at 1%) containing 25 µl blood cells was placed on the NMA and allowed to rest at 4 °C for 30 min.

109

Afterwards, the slides were placed in lysis solution (2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2 EDTA, 10 mM Tris-

110

HCl, 1% Triton X-100 and 10% DMSO, pH 10) at 4 °C for 1.5 h in the dark. The slides were then

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 111

washed with chilled distilled water and placed in a horizontal gel electrophoresis chamber in an

112

alkaline buffer (300 mM NaOH, 1 mM Na2EDTA, pH>13) at 20 °C using 20 V and 200 mA for 30

113

min in the dark to avoid DNA damage. After electrophoresis, each slide was neutralized with

114

neutralization buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCI, pH 7.3) three times, washed with chilled distilled water and

115

placed in ethanol for 5 min at 4 °C. Finally, the samples were stained with Godview for 20 min in the

116

dark and observed with a fluorescence microscope (BX51, Olympus, Japan) at 490 nm excitation. Each

117

group yielded three parallel samples, and 100 cells were observed on each slide. The images of comets

118

were analyzed using Comet Assay Software Project, CASP software.

119

2.4.3. Statistical analysis

120 121

The data from the control and treatment groups were analyzed by Student's t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the commercial software SPSS 12.0.

122 123

3. Results and Discussion

124

3.1. MCN

125



126

Fig. 1.Micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities from erythrocytes of Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles(10 *

127

100) (a)normal nuclear (b) micronucleus; (c) nuclear concavity; (d) nuclear protrusion;(e)nuclear and

128

micronucleus linked by silk; (f)three micronucleus (g) nuclear vacuole;(h) nuclear pycnosis.

129



130

Fig. 2. Micronuclei analysis of the three algal cultures: Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301 (a),

131

Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083 (c) and Scenedsmus quadricauda FACHB-507 (e) and corresponding

132

algal cultures treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium ((b), (d), and (f), respectively).

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 133



134

The MCN test can reflect damage and aneuploidy of the chromosomes or spindle. It is a

135

useful technology for determining chromosome damage by monitoring the micronucleus. The

136

frequency of micronuclei and nuclear anomalies can be used as an index for the genetic toxicity in cells

137

after physical, chemical or biological processing(Çelik et al., 2005, 2006;Vanessa et al., 2004). An

138

algicidal effect of fungus was observed in 2010 (Wang et al., 2010). However, the genetic effects of

139

fungi on algae have not been reported in detail. This study is the first in genotoxicityity assessment for

140

Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083 and Scenedesmus quadricauda

141

FACHB-507 treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium in the red blood cells of Fejervarya multistriat

142

tadpoles. Fig.1 shows the visual classifications of the micronuclei. Judging from the results of this

143

study, the

144

concentration range. However, compared to the control groups, micronuclei and nuclear anomalies

145

associated with the three algae treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium were less frequent (Fig.2).

146

Table 4 presents the frequencies of

147

algae treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium after 1, 3, 5 and 7 d.

micronucleus and

nuclear

anomalies

increased

in

a

certain

micronuclei and nuclear anomalies after exposure to algae and

148

According to the results of this study, the three species of algae could induce micronuclei and

149

nuclear anomalies. The micronucleus and nuclear anomaly rates increased over time in a certain

150

concentration range. However, the micronuclei and nuclear anomaly rates tended to be stable when

151

tadpoles were exposed for a long time. The results of SPSS analysis indicated that there was a

152

statistically significant difference between the control and experimental groups, with significant

153

(p<0.05) or extremely significant differences (p<0.01). The MCN frequency increased from 3.82±0.06,

154

3.75±0.11 and 3.87±0.05 at 1 d to 5.82±0.06, 5.78±0.13 and 5.87±0.05 in tadpoles treated with control

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 155

group algae after 7 d. Compared to the control groups, the values for tadpoles exposed to algae treated

156

with Phanerochaete chrysosporium were only increased from 1.95±0.09, 2.78±0.08 and 2.37±0.13 to

157

2.45±0.07, 3.56±0.08 and 2.54±0.10. The frequency of nuclear anomalies ranged from 8.97±0.04,

158

12.53±0.07 and 10.56±0.08 to 15.86±0.08, 18.51±0.08 and 17.56±0.06 within 7 d, but reached

159

6.45±0.06, 11.14±0.05 and 7.85±0.10 to 7.68±0.08, 13.12±0.06 and 8.57±0.12 in the experimental

160

groups after 7 d. The present study investigated micronuclei induced by algae and Phanerochaete

161

chrysosporium; however, there are many factors that can influence the micronucleus rate of an

162

organism, such as poison mechanism, poison concentration, and the subjects biology sensitivity, which

163

can lead to inconsistent results. Therefore, more research is needed to improve our understanding of the

164

genetic toxicity of algae treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium in the future.

165

3.2. Comet assay

166



167

Fig. 3.SCGE in erythrocytes of Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles(10*40):0 degree(a);1 degree(b); 2

168

degree(c);3 degree(d);4 degree(e).

169



170

Fig. 4. DNA damage in blood cells treated with the three algal cultures: Cryptomonas obovata

171

FACHB-1301 (a), Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083 (c) and Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 (e)

172

and corresponding algal cultures treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium ((b), (d), and (f),

173

respectively).

174



175



176

The effects of environmental pollution on biological genetic material has become a major

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 177

problem. Environmental changes can interfere or disrupt DNA replication and eventually cause direct

178

or indirect DNA damage. This method can allow for the quantitative detection of DNA damage in

179

eukaryotic cells (Djomo et al.,1995;Lee et al.,2003), such as single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks

180

and DNA cross-linking.

181

The process of algae bloom or rupture can secrete many toxins. In various algal species,

182

microcystins have been found, and MC-LR, MC-RR and MC-YR are the most common types. It has

183

been confirmed that algal toxins can be a hazard to the water environment and human health through

184

the food chain(Acero et al.,2005;Brooke et al., 2006). Compared to the other types of amphibians,

185

certain characteristics of Fejervarya multistriat make them amenable to these type of studies (Clements

186

et al.,1997;Matzenbacher et al.,2017;Rajaguru et al.,2001) including their low cost, high nuclear

187

proliferation, and high skin permeability. Therefore, the red blood cell comet assay in Fejervarya

188

multistriat tadpoles can effectively reflect the mutagens in the water environment and it is a

189

suitable experimental animal and has a high practical value.

190

As seen from the table 5 and table 6, the control groups all showed migration, and the tail lengths

191

were increased from 0.45±0.09, 0.58±0.11 and 0.53±0.17 to 61.44±0.43, 56.63±0.48 and 61.31±0.76 in

192

control group-treated tadpoles after 7 d. Compared to the control groups, the migration of DNA from

193

tadpoles exposed to algae treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium were only increased to

194

36.77±0.54, 41.58±0.78 and 35.38 ± 0.66, respectively. The comet length of the three control groups

195

ranged from 1.12±0.21, 1.76±0.32 and 1.54±0.27 to 91.45±0.65, 88.56±0.82 and 90.34±0.85 with the

196

7-d treatment, but these values reached 55.67±0.68, 68.56±0.85 and 51.43±0.82 in the experimental

197

groups after 7 d. These results indicated that the red blood cells of Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles can

198

be seriously affected by algae in water where the algae underwent eutrophic growth or rupture. After

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 199

treatment with Phanerochaete chrysosporium, the comet rate and degree of DNA damage were less

200

than the control. The reasons for this may be that Phanerochaete chrysosporium can damage the

201

structure of algal cells and degrade the toxin using secreted proteins, such as super oxide dismutase or

202

peroxidase. Although these results demonstrated, via analysis of the blood cells of Fejervarya

203

multistriat tadpoles, that treatment with Phanerochaete chrysosporium can inhibit algal bloom and

204

decrease algal toxicity, there is still much more work needed to improve our understanding of the

205

genetic toxicity of algal bloom treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium in the future.

206

4. Conclusions

207

In this study, Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083F, and

208

Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporim, at a dosage of 250

209

mg-l, pH 7.0, and DO of 7.0 mg-l, showed lower genotoxicity effects in tadpoles than in tadpoles that

210

were directly exposed to algae. We found that micronuclei, nuclear anomaly frequencies and DNA

211

damage in the red blood cells of Fejervarya multistriat tadpoles were all significantly induced by the

212

three algae but were lower after the algae were treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Although

213

Phanerochaete chrysosporium can decrease the algal toxin and has little genetoxicity itself, the safety

214

of algae control system by white rot fungi should be comprehensively investigated in combination with

215

aquatic animals, aquatic plants and microorganisms in the field.

216

Acknowledgments

217

This work was supported by the National key research and development program

218

(No.2017YFC0404706-1);National Natural Science Foundation(51808086);Special project of

219

basic research and frontier exploration in Chongqing(cstc2018jcyjA1329cstc,2018jcyjA1341); the

220

Education Committee of Sichuan Province (No.17ZB0299,No.17ZB0313);the Sichuan University of

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 221

Science and Technology level talent introduction project(No.2016RCL06);Chongqing Science and

222

Technology College Research Fund(No.ck2017zkyb012);Water pollution control and management

223

technology innovation project in Wenzhou (W20170010).

224

References

225

Acero J.L., Rodriguez E., Meriluoto J.,2005. Kinetics of reactions between chlorine and the

226

cyanobacterial toxins microcystins.Water. Res. 39,1628-1638.

227

Ai S.K., Metcalfe C.D.,1995.Fish micronuclei for assessing genotoxicity in water. Mutat.Res.343, 121-

228

135.

229

Acero J.L., Rodriguez E.,Meriluoto J.,2005.Kinetics of reactions between chlorine and the

230

cyanobacterial toxins microcystins .Water. Res. 39,1628-1638.

231

Brooke S. , Newcombe G. , Nicholson B. , Klass G.,2006.Decrease in toxicity of microcystins LA and

232

LR in drinking water by ozonation .Toxicon. 48,1054-1059.

233

Campbell G.,Phinn S.R., Dekker A.G., Brando V.E.,2011. Remote

234

an Australian tropical freshwater impoundment using matrix inversion and MERIS images. Remote.

235

Sens. Environ. 115,2402-2414.

236

Çavas T., 2011.In vivo genotoxicity evaluation of atrazine and atrazine-based herbicide on fish

237

Carassius auratus using the micronucleus test and the comet assay. Food. Chem.Toxicol.49, 1431-1435.

238

Crasta K. ,Ganem N.J., Dagher R., Lantermann A.B., Ivanova E.V., Pan Y., Nezi L.,Protopopov A.,

239

Chowdhury D., Pellman D., 2012.DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis,

240

Nature. 482,53-58.

241

Çelik A., Ög˘enler O., Çömelekog˘lu Ü.,2005.The evaluation of micronucleus frequency by acridine

242

orange fluorescent staining in peripheral blood of rats treated with lead acetate. Mutagenesis.20 ,411-

11

sensing

of

water

quality

in

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 243

415.

244

Çelik A., Kanık A., 2006.Genotoxicity of occupational exposure to wood dust: micronucleus frequency

245

and nuclear changes in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 47,693-698.

246

Clements C., Ralph S., Petras M., 1997. Genotoxicity of select herbicides in Rana catesbeiana tadpoles

247

using the alkaline sing-cell gel DNA electrophoresis (Comet) assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 29,277-

248

288.

249

Djomo J.E., Ferrier V., Gauthier L., Zoll M.C., Marty J., 1995.Amphibian micronucleus test in vivo:

250

evaluation of the genotoxicityity of some major polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in crude oil.

251

Mutagenesis.10, 223-226.

252

Han G.M., Feng X.G., Jia Y., Wang C.Y., X.B. He, Zhou Q.Y., Tian X.J., 2011. Isolation and

253

evaluation of terrestrial fungi with algicidal ability from Zijin Mountain, Nanjing, China. J. Microbiol.

254

49, 562-567.

255

Huang C., Lai C., Xu P., Zeng G.M., Huang D.L., Zhang J.C., Zhang C., Cheng M., Wan J., Wang

256

R.Z.2017. Lead-

257

induced oxidative stress and antioxidant response provide insight into the tolerance of Phanerochaete c

258

hrysosporium to lead exposure. Chemosphere.187,70-77.

259

Janina B.,Juozas L., Veronika D., Aleksandras R., Edvardas B., Anne B., Odd K. A., 2004.Analysis of

260

micronuclei in blue mussels and fish from the Baltic and North Seas. Environ. Toxicol.19,365-371.

261

Jackson S.P., Bartek J.,2009. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease.

262

Nature.461,1071-1078.

263

Jia Y. , Wang Q.,Chen Z.H.,Jiang W.X. , Zhang P., Tian X.J., 2010,Inhibition of phytoplankton species

264

by co-culture with a fungus. Ecol. Eng.36,1389-1391.

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 265

Koehler C., Ginzkey C.,Iriehs C., Hackenberg S., Iroelich K., Scherzed A., Burghartz M., Kessler M.,

266

Kleinsasser N.,2010.Aspects of nitrogen dioxide toxicity in environmental urban concentrations in

267

hunan nasal epithelium. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 245,219-225.

268

Lavelle J., Meyers S., Ramage R., Bastacky S.,Doty D.,Apodaca G., Zeidel M.L., 2002.Bladder

269

permeability barrier: recovery from selective injury of surface epithelial cells, Am. J. Physiol. Renal.

270

Physiol. 283 ,242-253.

271

Lee R.F., Steiner S.t, 2003.Use of the single cell gel electrophoresis/Comet assay for detecting DNA

272

damage in aquatic (marine and freshwater) animals. Mutat. Res.544,43-64.

273

Ma F.F., Carbone F., Forti G.C., Buschini A.,Poli P., Rossi C.,Marabini L.,Radice S.,Chiesara E.,

274

Hrelia P., 2009. Drinking water quality: an in vitro approach for the assessment of cytotoxic and

275

genotoxic load in water sampled along distribution system. Environ. Int. 35,1053-1061.

276

Matzenbacher C.A., Garcia A.L.H. ,Santos M.S.D. ,Nicolau C.C., Premoli S. , Correa D.S., Souza

277

C.T.D. , Niekraszewicz L., Dias J.F., Delgado T.V.,2017. DNA damage induced by coal dust, fly and

278

bottom ash from coal combustion evaluated using the micronucleus test and comet assay in vitro.J.

279

Hazard. Mater.324,781-788.

280

Na C.H., Zhang Y. , Quan X., Chen S., Liu W., Zhang Y.B., 2017.Evaluation of the detoxification

281

efficiencies of coking wastewater treated by combined anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A(2)O) and advanced

282

oxidation process.J. Hazard. Mater.338,186-193.

283

Rajaguru P., Kalpana R., Hema A., Suba S., Baskarasethupathi B.,Kumar P.A., Kalasielvi K.,

284

2001.Genotoxicity of some sulfur dyes on tadpoles Rana hexadactyla measured using the Comet assay.

285

Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 38,316-322.

286

Su R.Q., Yang X.R., Zheng T.L., Tian Y., Jiao N.Z., L.Z. Cai, Hong H.S.,2007. Isolation and

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 287

characterization of a marine algicidal bacterium against the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium

288

tamarense. Harmful Algae. 6,799-810.

289

Smith G.R. 2001.Efects of Acute Exposure to a Commercial Formalation of Glyphosate on the

290

Tadpoles of Two Species of Anurans. B. Environ. Contam. Tox.67, 483-488.

291

Shedbalkar U., Dhanve R., Jadhav J., 2008. Biodegradation of triphenylmethane dye cotton blue by

292

Penicillium ochrochloron MTCC 517. J. Hazard. Mater.157,472-79.

293

Singh N.P., McCoy M.T., Tice R.R., Schneider E.L., 1988.A simple technique for quantification of low

294

levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 175,184-191.

295

Vanessa M.A., Juliana S., Fernanda R.S., Vanina D.H., Johnny F.D., Maria L.Y.,Thales F., 2004.Fish

296

as bioindicators to assess the effects of pollution in two southern Brazilian rivers using the Comet assay

297

and micronucleus test. Environ. Mol. Mutage. 44,459-468.

298

Wang Q.,Su M.,Zhu W.,Li X.,Jia Y.,Guo P.,Chen Z.,JiangW.,Tian X., 2010.Growth inhibition of

299

Microcystis aeruginosa by white-rot fungus Lop Haria spadicea.Water. Sci. Techno.62,317-323.

300

Xie J.R., Ming Z., Li H.L., Yang H.Yu B.W.,Wu R.H., Liu X.Y., Bai Y.T., Yang S.T. 201

301

6. Toxicity of graphene oxide to white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Chemosphere. 151,32

302

4-331.

303

Zamyadi A., Mac Leod S.L., Fan Y., Mc Quaid N., Domer S., Sauve S., 2012, Prevost,Toxic

304

cyanobacterial breakthrough and accumulation in a drinking water plant: a monitoring and treatment

305

challenge. Water. Res.46, 1511-1523.

306

Zong W.S., Sun F., Sun X.J., 2013,Oxidation by-products formation of microcystin-LR exposed to

307

UV/H202:Toward the generative mechanism and biological toxicity.Water. Res.47,3211-3219.

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 308

Zeng G.M.,Wang P., Wang Y., 2015. Algicidal efficiency and mechanism of Phanerochaete

309

chrysosporium against harmful algal bloom species. Algal. Res.12,182-190.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Research highlights ▶The genotoxicity effects of algal species co-cultured with Phanerochaete chrysosporium is first investigated . ▶Micronucleus and comet assay are used to evaluate genotoxicity. ▶Phanerochaete chrysosporium effectively decreased genotoxicity effects .

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1 .The growth media for Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301 was AF-6 (pH 6.6). Medicine

Content (g-L)

Trace metal solution Medicine

Content (g-L)

NaNO3

0.14

MnCl2·4H2O

0.041

KH2PO4

0.01

Na2EDTA

0.75

K2HPO4

0.005

FeCl3·6 H2O

0.097

NH4NO3

0.022

ZnCl2·7H2O

0.005

CaCl2·2H2O

0.01

Na2MoO4·2H2O

0.004

Fe-citrate

0.002

CoCl2·6 H2O

0.002

MgSO4·7H2O

0.03

Citric acid

0.002

Biotin

0.000002

Thiamine HCl

0.00001

Vitamin B6

0.000001

Vitamin B12

0.000001

MES

0.4 g

Trace metal solution

6ml-L

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2 .The growth media for Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083 was BG-11(pH 7.5). Medicine

Content (g-L)

A5 solution (0.1ml) Medicine

Content (g-L)

NaNO3

0.15

H3BO3

0.286

Na2SiO3·9H2O

0.0058

MnCl2·4H2O

0.181

K2HPO4

0.004

ZnSO4·7H2O

0.0022

Citric acid

0.006

CuSO4·5H2O

0.0079

EDTA

0.001

Na2MoO4·2H2O

0.0039

Na2CO3

0.002

CoCl2·6 H2O

0.002

Ferric ammonium

0.0006

citrate CaCl2·2H2O

0.0036

MgSO4·7H2O

0.0075

A5 solution

0.1ml-L

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3 .The growth media for Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 was SE (pH 7.5). Medicine

Content (g-L)

Soil extract solution Medicine

Content (g-L)

NaNO3

0.025

H3BO3

0.286

NaCl

0.0025

MnCl2·4H2O

0.181

K2HPO4·3H2O

0.0075

ZnSO4·7H2O

0.0022

MgSO4·7H2O

0.0075

CuSO4·5H2O

0.0079

CaCl2·2H2O

0.0025

Na2MoO4·2H2O

0.0039

KH2PO4

0.0175

CoCl2·6 H2O

0.002

Fecl3·6H2O

0.0005

EDTA-Na

0.0002

Soil extract solution

40 ml-L

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 4. Micronuclei analysis of the three algal cultures: Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301 (a), Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083 (c) and Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 (e) and corresponding algal cultures treated with Phanerochaete chrysosporium ((b), (d), and (f), respectively). sample

1d

3d

5d

7d

micronucl

abnormal

micronucleus

abnormal

Micronucleus

abnormal

Micronucleus

abnormal

eus rate

nucleus rate

rate

nucleus rate

rate

nucleus rate

rate

nucleus rate

















a

3.82±0.06

8.97±0.04

4.31±0.08

10.28±0.10

4.52±0.07

12.21±0.08

5.82±0.06

15.86±0.08

b

1.95±0.09*

6.45±0.06*

2.03±0.05**

6.64±0.07**

2.19±0.05**

7.43±0.07**

2.45±0.07*

7.68±0.08**

c

3.87±0.05

12.53±0.07

4.13±0.09

14.86±0.03

4.37±0.09

16.54±0.08

5.87±0.05

18.51±0.08

d

2.78±0.08*

11.14±0.05*

3.12±0.06**

11.21±0.07

3.48±0.06**

12.32±0.09*

3.56±0.08**

13.12±0.06**

e

3.75±0.11

10.56±0.08

4.45±0.09

13.43±0.06

4.71±0.09

14.56±0.05

5.78±0.13

17.56±0.06

f

2.17±0.13*

7.85±0.10**

2.23±0.11**

7.93±0.07*

2.32±0.10**

8.18±0.13**

2.54±0.10**

8.57±0.12**

Compared with control group; *P <0 .05; **P <0.01.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 5. DNA damage induced by Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083F and Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 on blood cells as detected by Comet assay. Time (d)

Tail length

Comet length

0

0.45±0.09a

0.58±0.11b

0.53±0.17c

1.12±0.21a

1.76±0.32b

1.54±0.27c

1

10.56±0.45a

13.22±0.41b

13.15±0.23c

31.35±0.32a

37.12±0.24b

36.54±0.76c

3

31.68±0.34a

36.41±0.65b

37.12±0.62c

55.36±0.86a

49.45±0.67b

51.36±0.71c

5

41.53±0.57a

43.21±0.54b

48.43±0.81c

69.17±0.73a

66.34±0.74b

71.54±0.83c

7

61.44±0.43a

56.63±0.48b

61.31±0.76c

91.45±0.65a

88.56±0.82b

90.34±0.85c

a Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, b Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083F, c Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 Compared with control group; *P <0 .05;**P <0.01.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 6. DNA damage induced by Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083F and Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 co-cultured with Phanerochaete chrysosporium on blood cells as detected by Comet assay.

Time (d)

Tail length

Comet length

0

0.45±0.09a

0.58±0.11b

0.53±0.17c

1.12±0.21a

1.76±0.32b

1.54±0.27c

1

4.34±0.52*a

5.15±0.71**b

4.73±0.63**c

13.42±0.57*a

15.36±0.74*b

16.13±0.69c

3

19.68±0.46*a

16.44±0.62*b

17.35±0.57c

25.57±0.82**a

29.47±0.66**b

21.75±0.69*c

5

28.51±0.75a

31.37±0.37b

26.54±0.76**c

39.86±0.91**a

41.23±0.64*b

38.57±0.87**c

7

36.77±0.54**a

41.58±0.78**b

35.38±0.66*c

55.67±0.68a

68.56±0.85*b

51.43±0.82**c

a Cryptomonas obovata FACHB-1301, b Oscillatoria sp. FACHB-1083F, c Scenedesmus quadricauda FACHB-507 co-cultured by Phanerochaete chrysosporium.Compared with control group; *P <0 .05; **P <0.01.