Journal Pre-proof Germinal stage vitrification is superior to MII stage vitrification in prepubertal mouse oocytes Akshatha Daddangadi, Shubhashree Uppangala, Guruprasad Kalthur, Riccardo Talevi, Satish Kumar Adiga PII:
S0011-2240(19)30315-3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.02.012
Reference:
YCRYO 4193
To appear in:
Cryobiology
Received Date: 21 October 2019 Revised Date:
24 February 2020
Accepted Date: 25 February 2020
Please cite this article as: A. Daddangadi, S. Uppangala, G. Kalthur, R. Talevi, S.K. Adiga, Germinal stage vitrification is superior to MII stage vitrification in prepubertal mouse oocytes, Cryobiology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.02.012. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
1
Title: Germinal stage vitrification is superior to MII stage vitrification in
2
prepubertal mouse oocytes.
3
4
Author affiliation: Akshatha Daddangadi1 Shubhashree Uppangala1, Guruprasad Kalthur1,
5
Riccardo Talevi2, Satish Kumar Adiga1
6 7
1
8
Higher Education, Manipal-576 104, India.
9
2
10
Department of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli "Federico II", Complesso Universitario di Monte
S Angelo, Napoli, Italy.
11 12
Corresponding authors:
13
Satish Kumar Adiga, PhD
14
Department of Clinical Embryology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of
15
Higher Education, Manipal-576 104, India Tel: 91-820-29-22320,
16
E mail:
[email protected]
17 18 19
Short title: Vitrification of prepubertal oocytes
20
Key words: prepubertal oocyte, fertility preservation, oocyte vitrification, in vitro maturation
21
Word count: 4035
1
22
Abstract
23
This study investigated if in vitro maturation (IVM) before or after vitrification would be more
24
successful for prepubertal oocytes. To mimic prepubertal conditions in an experimental setup,
25
oocytes were collected from healthy 14, 21 and 28day old Swiss albino mice. The germinal
26
vesicle (GV) stage oocytes and in vitro matured MII oocytes were subjected to vitrification-
27
warming. Both structural (meiotic spindle morphology, mitochondrial integrity, cortical
28
granules) and functional (sperm zona binding, fertilization) characteristics were assessed in
29
oocytes after warming. This study demonstrated that IVM was more detrimental to prepubertal
30
oocytes than to young adults. Further, vitrification of the IVM oocytes resulted in an increase in
31
the number of abnormal meiotic spindles, a change in the cortical distribution pattern, a
32
reduction in sperm zona binding and the fertilization rate. Importantly, oocyte integrity was
33
better when prepubertal oocytes were vitrified before, rather than after, IVM. The above
34
observations support GV stage vitrification for prepubertal oocytes requiring fertility
35
preservation. Understanding the mechanisms behind the differing outcomes for oocytes from
36
immature females will help in refining current protocol, thereby retaining the oocytes’ maximum
37
structural and functional integrity Further investigation is necessary to determine whether human
38
prepubertal oocytes also behave in a similar way. It is to be noted here, with great emphasis, that
39
a major limitation of this study is that the oocytes’ abilities were tested only until fertilisation, as
40
a consequence of which the study cannot reveal the developmental potentials of the embryos
41
beyond fertilisation.
42
2
43
1. Introduction
44
Chemotherapy and radiation used in the treatment of cancer can have a significant impact on
45
ovarian function of young women and girls [7]. Hence, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and re
46
implantation of cryopreserved tissue is the most preferred option available to preserve fertility
47
before gonadotoxic therapy [30]. However, malignant cells present in the ovary may pose the
48
risk of reintroducing cancer post transplantation [8]. Therefore, the ability of an immature oocyte
49
to mature in vitro would be of relevance to fertility preservation for overcoming this problem.
50
Tissue harvested from prepubertal females contains only immature oocytes within the follicles,
51
which would need to be matured in vitro either within the follicle [2] or extracted and subjected
52
to in vitro maturation (IVM). Matured oocytes will then be fertilized by assisted reproductive
53
technology (ART) in hope of establishing successful pregnancy in the survivors [18]. Though,
54
IVM of germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes to metaphase II (MII) stage oocytes has been the subject
55
of research for almost four decades [24], experimental data suggest that immature oocytes
56
obtained from a prepubertal ovary have lower ability to form viable offspring after IVM of
57
immature oocytes from the adult ovary [25,26]. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly
58
understood.
59
Due to the increasing interest in fertility preservation to help cancer affected prepubertal girls
60
[14], it is important for oncologists and fertility experts to be aware of the success rates and
61
limiting factors of oocyte vitrification in order to provide patients with proper counseling. GV
62
oocytes retrieved from the ovarian tissues of prepubertal girls who need an urgent intervention of
63
chemo- or radiotherapy may be of great value in identifying appropriate fertility preservation
64
techniques. In such cases, the question is whether GV oocytes should be vitrified before or after
65
IVM in order to maintain the highest developmental competence [3,4]. 3
66
Oocyte maturation is a complex process that involves both nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation
67
[35], which if disturbed can alter spatial and temporal dynamics of the oocyte and affect their
68
functional competence[31]. One specific major problem associated with cryopreservation of
69
metaphase II oocytes is the sensitivity of the microtubular spindle to cryoprotectants and low
70
temperatures [27]. To circumvent this problem, vitrification of whole follicles or immature
71
oocytes at the GV stage can be used although this requires in vitro maturation after warming. We
72
hypothesized that prepubertal GV stage oocytes have limited functional ability than oocytes from
73
adults and that subjecting them to in vitro maturation after vitrification will further reduce their
74
structural and functional integrity. Hence, using mouse model, this study investigated whether
75
IVM is more successful before or after vitrification in maintaining the structural and functional
76
integrity of prepubertal oocytes.
77
78
2. Materials and methods
79
2.1 Animals and oocyte collection
80
Female Swiss albino mice, housed and maintained at controlled conditions of 24±2ºC
81
temperature, 50-60 % humidity, 12:12h light-dark cycle fed with water ad libitum were used in
82
the study. The animal handling and all the experiments were implemented in accordance with the
83
institutional guidelines for animal experimentation after obtaining prior approval from the
84
Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC/KMC/07/2018). To mimic prepubertal effects in
85
an experimental setup, healthy female siblings were sacrificed on postnatal day 14, postnatal day
86
21 and postnatal day 28; (hereafter referred to as D14, D21 and D28 respectively) to collect
87
oocytes. The ovaries were gently teased using fine needles and germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes
4
88
were released from the follicles to HEPES based, prewarmed M2 medium. Oocyte imaging was
89
done using an inverted phase contrast microscope (40X, IX 73, Olympus, Japan). Ooplasmic
90
diameter was measured using Q-Capture software (Media Cybernetics Inc., USA).
91
2.2 Oocyte vitrification and warming
92
Oocytes retrieved from D14, D21 and D28 groups were divided into non-vitrified control, GV
93
vitrified in vitro matured (GV-V) and GV in vitro matured vitrified (MII-V) groups.
94
Accordingly, vitrification was done as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Cat. No. VT601 &
95
VT602 Kitazato Corporation, Japan). The entire process was performed at room temperature as
96
per the protocol of [28], with minor modifications. Two droplets each of 100 µl for the basic
97
solution (BS), equilibrated solution (ES), and the vitrification solution (VS) was used. About 10
98
oocytes were placed in a BS droplet, mixed with an ES droplet and left for 3 min. Oocytes were
99
then transferred to a new ES droplet and left for 9 min. Finally, each group of oocytes was placed
100
in VS for 1 min, loaded into the Cryolock® (Cat. No. CL-R-CT Biotech, Inc., USA) using a
101
small volume of media (about 2µl) and plunged into the liquid nitrogen and stored in the
102
immersion phase.
103
The process of thawing was performed at room temperature except for the first step. There were
104
three warming media: thawing solution (TS), dilution solution (DS) and washing solution (WS).
105
The Cryolock® was removed under liquid nitrogen and dipped into a 400 µl of pre warmed TS
106
for one minute on a petridish. Then the oocytes were placed in 100 µl of DS for 3 min, 100 µl of
107
WS for 5 min before cultured in M16 medium (Cat. No. M7292, Sigma Aldrich, USA) for 3 h
108
prior to survival check. Only those oocytes having homogenous cytoplasm, intact plasma
109
membrane and zona pellucida were considered as survived and used for further analysis. Control
110
oocytes were subjected to identical conditions except vitrification – warming. 5
111
112
2.3 In vitro maturation (IVM)
113
The GV oocytes devoid of cumulus cells were subjected to in vitro maturation (IVM) as
114
described previously [33]. D14 and D21 oocytes did not have cumulus cells attached to them
115
whereas only cumulus free oocytes were considered in case of D28, Briefly, oocytes were
116
cultured in 20µL Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Cat. No. D5648 Sigma
117
Aldrich, USA) supplemented with non-essential α-amino acids (1 %, Cat. No. M7145 Sigma
118
Aldrich, USA), Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (1 %, Cat. No. 51500-056 Gibco, India), pyruvate
119
(10 µM, Cat. No. P3662 Sigma Aldrich, USA), and bovine serum albumin (0.3 %, Cat. No.
120
MB083 Sigma Aldrich, USA) overlaid with oil. IVM medium did not contain any hormones.
121
Oocytes were incubated at 37°C in 5 % CO2 for 24 h and then assessed for nuclear maturity,
122
extrusion of polar bodies, mitochondrial potential, spindle morphology and cortical granule
123
distribution. Oocytes were also inseminated to evaluate fertilization rates and sperm zona
124
binding.
125
2.4 Analysis of spindle morphology
126
Metaphase II oocytes were rinsed in phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 0.1 % BSA
127
and permeabilized at 37°C for 1h using extraction buffer (50mM Potassium chloride, Cat. No.
128
P5405 Sigma Aldrich, USA; 5mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt, Cat. No. 54960
129
Sisco Research Laboratories, India; 0.5 mM Magnesium chloride, Cat. No. 1349130 Sisco
130
Research Laboratories, India; 25 mM HEPES, Cat. No. H-3375 Sigma Aldrich, USA; 25 %
131
Glycerol, Cat. No. G9012 Sigma Aldrich, USA; 2 % Triton X-100, Cat. No. 1.8603.1000,
132
Merck; 20 µM phenylmethane sulphonyl fluoride, Cat. No. 1592 Himedia, India) adjusted to pH
133
6.75. Then, oocytes were fixed using ice-cold methanol for 15 min at -20°C, and then blocked 6
134
using 5 % knock out serum (Cat. No. 10828-010 Gibco, India) and 0.25 % Triton-X for 1 h at
135
37°C. The oocytes were incubated overnight at 4°C in 1:150 diluted primary anti-α-tubulin
136
antibody (Cat. No. T9026 Sigma Aldrich, USA) followed by treatment with 1:500 FITC tagged
137
goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Cat. No. D0408 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, India) for 1h at 37°C.
138
The chromosomes were stained with 4 µg/mL DAPI (4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole Cat. No.
139
D9542 Sigma Aldrich, USA), and observed under the fluorescent microscope (Imager-A1, Zeiss,
140
Gottingen, Germany). The spindle images were captured under 40X objective using Q-Capture
141
software (Media Cybernetics Inc., USA).
142
2.5 Oocyte mitochondrial potential
143
Mitochondria in oocytes provides energy for fertilization and subsequent preimplantation
144
development. Here we used JC1, a mitochondrial specific probe to determine the mitochondrial
145
potential in relation to the age of the animals. JC1 fluoresces red in the presence of active
146
mitochondria by forming aggregates. In the presence of inactive mitochondria as the probe
147
remains in monomeric state, the probe fluoresces green. The mitochondrial potential was
148
measured as previously described [33] with minor modification. Oocytes were briefly washed
149
and
150
tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide; Cat. No. T3168, Molecular Probes, Life
151
Technologies, USA) in M199 media (Cat. No. M5017 Sigma Aldrich, USA) supplemented with
152
0.1 % BSA at 37°C, and 5 % CO2. After 30 min, excess stain was washed with M199 medium
153
containing 0.1 % BSA and mounted on a glass slide using mounting media (Cat. No. S3023
154
DAKO, US). Labelled oocytes were observed under the fluorescent microscope. The ratio of JC-
155
1 aggregates (orange fluorescence) to JC-1 monomer (green fluorescence) was analyzed using
156
ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA).
then
treated
with
pre-warmed
1
µg/mL
7
JC-1(5,5’,6,6’-Tetrachloro-1,1’,3,3’-
157
2.6 Staining of cortical granules (CGs) and confocal microscopy
158
Cortical granules change their location during oocyte maturation leading to cortical granule free
159
domain (CGFD) in metaphase II mouse oocytes which is an indicator of cytoplasmic maturation.
160
Cortical granule staining and analysis was done as described earlier [23] with few modifications.
161
Briefly, the oocyte zona pellucida was removed by exposing oocytes to acid tyrode (Cat. No.
162
T1788 Sigma Aldrich, USA) for < 1 min. Zona free oocytes were then fixed using 4 %
163
paraformaldehyde (Cat. No. 8.18715.1000 Merck, India) at room temperature for 1h followed by
164
blocking in 1 % BSA, 0.01 M glycine and 0.05 % TritonX-100 in DPBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate-
165
buffered saline Cat. No. 56064C SAFC) for one hour. The cortical granules were stained using 5
166
µg/mL rhodamine tagged lens culinaris agglutinin (Cat. No. RL-1042 Vector Laboratories, Inc.,
167
CA, USA) for 30 min in dark. Oocytes were washed in DPBS and counterstained using DAPI
168
(4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole Cat. No. D9542 Sigma Aldrich, USA). Cortical granule
169
distribution was visualized, and images were acquired using the confocal microscope (LSM 510
170
META-Confocal Zeiss, Germany) and the percentage of oocytes displaying CGFD was
171
determined.
172
2.7 Evaluation of sperm zona binding and fertilization
173
Caudal spermatozoa extracted from 6-week-old male mice were used to evaluate the sperm-zona
174
binding. Spermatozoa were allowed to capacitate in M199 medium supplemented with 10 %
175
BSA for 2 h at 37°C in 5 % CO2 [17]. Sperm concentration was adjusted to 1X105 sperm/mL
176
prior to insemination. Metaphase II oocytes were incubated in 80 µL sperm suspension for 30
177
min at 37°C and 5 % CO2 thereafter washed gently to remove unbound sperm and fixed in 4 %
178
PFA. Oocytes were stained using DAPI (4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole Cat. No. D9542, Sigma
179
Aldrich, USA) and the number of sperm nuclei bound to the zona was assessed under the
8
180
fluorescent microscope. Fertilization ability was tested in separate set of experiments after 13 h
181
of insemination. The presence of two pronuclei and two polar bodies indicated successful normal
182
fertilization.
183
2.8 Statistical analysis
184
Data represented either as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) or in percentage (%). Chi
185
square test was applied for percentage data whereas one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was
186
used (if data had followed normality) otherwise Kruskal Wallis test was used to test the
187
difference between the study groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant. The statistical tests
188
were done using GraphPAD Instat software (Graphpad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and the
189
graphical representation of the data was prepared using Microcal Origin 6.0 software (Origin Lab
190
Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
191 192
3. Results
193
194
3.1 Age, in vitro maturation potential and vitrification-warming survival
195
The diameter of the GV oocytes soon after collection was assessed from the different age groups.
196
The mean ooplasmic diameter in D14, D21 and D28 was 60.39 ± 0.61, 70.86 ± 0.64 and 77.44 ±
197
0.31 uM respectively. Oocyte size increased significantly with the age of the animals (P < 0.001).
198
Age dependent changes in the in vitro maturation potential was observed when GV oocytes
199
isolated from D14, D21 and D28 mice were subjected to in vitro maturation (Fig 1a). At the end
200
of 24 h, the maturation rate of D28 and D21 mice was similar (79 % and 78 %), whereas D14
201
oocytes showed a significant reduction in the maturation potential (63 %) in comparison to D28
202
(P < 0.05) and D21 (P < 0.001). 9
203
In order to determine whether IVM is suitable before or after vitrification-warming for
204
prepubertal oocytes, we assessed the survival rate and maturation potential post vitrification-
205
warming of oocytes from various cohorts. No significant association was observed between the
206
prepubertal age and vitrification-warming survival. Vitrification warming did not affect the IVM
207
potential of GV oocytes (Fig 1a). Similarly, maturation status of the oocytes (viz GV or MII) did
208
not affect the survival post warming (Fig 1b).
209
3.2 Effect of IVM prior to vitrification-warming (MII-V) on spindle morphology, mitochondrial
210
potential and cortical granule redistribution.
211
Initially, to understand whether poor maturation potential of D14 oocytes has affected the
212
nuclear maturation, we assessed the meiotic spindle integrity in IVM oocytes (Fig 2a). About 26
213
% of the oocytes in D28 animals had an abnormal spindle pattern. Approximately 32 % of D14
214
oocytes had meiotic abnormalities post IVM which was significantly higher than D21 (P <
215
0.01). Interestingly, abnormal spindle structure was observed in D21 was about 14 %. However,
216
no statistical power was demonstrated with other groups.
217
To determine the appropriate oocyte stage that can protect the structural integrity post
218
vitrification-warming, both GV stage oocytes and IVM oocytes were assessed for the spindle
219
morphology (Fig 2b). Interestingly, it was found that IVM post vitrification-warming of GV
220
stage (GV-V) oocytes preserved the spindle morphology irrespective of the age of the animals.
221
In contrast, significant alteration in spindle structure was observed in MII-V group (Fig 2a).
222
Importantly, almost two-fold increase in the number of oocytes with a spindle abnormality was
223
found in D14 and D21 oocytes in comparison to GV-V (P < 0.001 and 0.01 respectively). On the
224
other hand, differences were not significantly different in D28 group.
10
225
JC1 ratio (red to green) was comparable across the age groups (Fig 3a). Images showing various
226
levels of mitochondrial potential of IVM oocytes from prepubertal ovary are shown in the Fig
227
3b. Further, skewed JC-1 ratio was observed in MII-V oocytes irrespective to the age of the
228
animals (P < 0.001). However, significant differences were also observed between GV-V and
229
MII-V groups except in D14 (Fig 3a).
230
When percentage of oocytes presenting CGFD were determined post IVM, D28 group displayed
231
about 84 % CGFD whereas it was about 89 % in D21 oocytes. On the other hand, D14 oocytes
232
showed a significant decline in CGFD compared to D21 group (76 %; P < 0.05; Fig 4a). Figure
233
4b depicts patterns of cortical granule redistribution in oocytes. The number of oocytes with
234
CGFD was significantly lower (P < 0.01) only in MII-V, D21 group though the trend was similar
235
in other groups (Fig 4a).
236
3.3 Effect of vitrification on sperm zona binding ability and fertilization potential
237
The changes found in cortical granule redistribution in prepubertal oocytes could affect the
238
binding ability of sperm to the zona pellucida. The analysis revealed an age dependent, but non-
239
significant increase in the number of capacitated spermatozoa bound to the zona pellucida (46.96
240
± 6.18, 58.33 ± 7.03, 69.55 ± 5.65 in D14, D21 and D28 groups) (Fig 5a). Importantly,
241
fertilization ability in D14 group was found to be significantly lower in comparison to D28 group
242
(Fig 5b). These results suggest that IVM oocytes from early prepubertal ovary have reduced
243
competence to undergo successful fertilization than young adults.
244
Further, significant impairment in sperm-zona binding was observed only in D21 group of GV-V
245
oocytes (P < 0.01). On the other hand, MII-V oocytes had significantly reduced sperm-zona
246
binding irrespective of the age of the animals (P < 0.001). The number of sperm bound to zona
11
247
was almost 2-3 fold lower compared to other groups (Fig 5a). Though, fertilization rate was low
248
in both vitrification groups, lowest fertilization rate was evident in MII-V oocytes (P < 0.01 -
249
0.001) (Fig 5b).
250
4 Discussion
251
The initial observations made in this study suggested that prepubertal oocytes are susceptible to
252
IVM when compared to that of young adults. Further, subjecting the prepubertal IVM oocytes to
253
vitrification-warming resulted in an increase in the number of abnormal meiotic spindles and
254
cortical distribution pattern in oocytes, reduced sperm zona binding and fertilization rate.
255
In vitro maturation (IVM) is clinically used to derive metaphase II oocytes that are competent to
256
be fertilized and capable of producing viable embryos [1, 34]; hence, considered as a potential
257
alternative to ovarian tissue transplantation in fertility preservation programs. However, one of
258
the major concerns in metaphase II oocyte vitrification is the cryo-sensitivity of microtubular
259
spindle organization and subsequent impact on its integrity [27]. To circumvent this problem,
260
GV stage vitrification is proposed where in vitro maturation is carried out post-warming. Based
261
on our initial observation, we hypothesized that as prepubertal GV stage oocytes have limited
262
functional ability in comparison to young adults, hence subjecting in vitro matured prepubertal
263
oocytes to vitrification-warming may further deteriorate the structural and functional integrity.
264
Our results clearly suggested that IVM is more successful after vitrification-warming of
265
prepubertal GV oocytes.
266
267
Though it was possible to fertilize in vitro matured prepubertal oocytes to produce viable
268
embryos in animals, the fertilization rate, blastocyst development and reproductive outcome 12
269
were found inferior to adults [26]. This could be attributed to the maternal sexual maturity or
270
difference in the follicular micro-environment or oocyte ultrastructure [10]. Oocytes of young
271
mice (especially the D14) have not completed their in vivo growth phase and exhibit poor
272
maturation rates. The average ooplasmic diameter in our study was significantly smaller in D14.
273
Earlier studies have used oocytes “greater than 70 µM” with a specified cumulus status [5].
274
However, oocytes from D14 used in this study had a mean ooplasmic diameter of 60.39±0.61
275
µM which could be a reason for poor functional competence. To have uniformity in our
276
experiments, we have mechanically removed the cumulus cells from D28 oocytes before
277
vitrification or IVM. Oocytes isolated from 12-day-old mice were totally incompetent to undergo
278
GVB in vitro, whereas the GVB rate increased progressively with mouse age and oocyte
279
diameter [20]. Few studies have also reported in vitro follicle culture from D14 mice [22,29] or
280
superovulating D21 mice before oocyte collection [15,36], however, this was not attempted in
281
our study as it was not mimicking the human clinical situation.
282
283
IVM of oocytes from the vitrified warmed ovarian tissue is an ideal option where ovarian tissue
284
transplantation is contraindicated due to the risk of reintroduction of the malignant cells.
285
However, important question is that whether the maturation ability of prepubertal oocytes is
286
similar to that of adult oocytes. Interestingly, IVM ability of vitrified warmed oocytes in this
287
study was comparable between prepubertal and young adults which was in contrary to the
288
observation made earlier where a significant reduction in the maturation rates of human GV
289
oocytes after vitrification when compared to IVM oocytes [4]. This observation made us to look
290
into cryo-susceptibility of GV and IVM derived MII oocytes. Surprisingly, survival was not
13
291
significantly different in relation to the age of the animals and stage of maturity prior to
292
vitrification (Fig 1).
293 294
Vitrification technique made a revolution in oocyte cryopreservation, in terms of oocyte survival
295
and IVF outcomes [6]. However, whether vitrification affects the physiology of oocytes
296
especially when used from prepubertal age group remains to be determined. Oocyte vitrification
297
has shown to damage organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum lysosomes and mitochondria
298
[13]. Mitochondria play a pivotal role in oocyte competence for production of the energy
299
required to perform all the cellular processes coordinated, such as programmed cell death or
300
spindle formation [9] and it has been shown that vitrification can alter mitochondrial distribution
301
and activity in mouse oocytes [21]. We investigated the mitochondrial potential between GV-V
302
and MII-V groups with respect to the age of the animal. Interestingly, mitochondrial potential
303
was significantly lower in MII-V oocytes from both prepubertal and young adult groups which
304
clearly suggested that mitochondria of in vitro matured MII oocytes have higher tendency to get
305
damaged. In addition, significantly higher incidence of abnormal spindle morphology was
306
observed in MII-V oocytes especially in D14 group. Though, oocyte vitrification at MII stage
307
alters spindle integrity [32], the extent of vitrification-warming induced abnormalities in D14
308
group was almost two-fold higher in prepubertal group whereas no significant difference was
309
observed in young adult oocytes.
310 311
Earlier studies have shown that both vitrification and IVM can impact intracellular calcium level
312
and thereby affect cortical granule redistribution [12]. Although, the current study demonstrated
14
313
moderate decrease in CGFD in both MII-V and GV-V group oocytes, significant reduction was
314
observed only in MII-V oocytes in D21 group.
315 316
A transient increase in intracellular calcium during oocyte vitrification can cause zona hardening
317
and eventually reduce sperm binding and fertilization [16, 19]. Though, GV-V oocytes showed
318
reduced zona binding and fertilization rate irrespective of the age of the animal, the extent of
319
reduction in the functional parameters of MII-V oocytes was significantly lower than GV-V
320
oocytes. At present we do not have any supporting mechanistic evidence to address this
321
interesting observation. Exploring the integrity of zona pellucida receptors between two groups
322
may provide valuable information. In contrast to our findings, IVM procedure is more efficient
323
when it is performed before oocyte vitrification in human adult oocytes [11]. However, we argue
324
that due to structural and functional uniqueness of prepubertal oocytes and lack of exposure to
325
endocrine milieu within the follicular environment, their ability to retain the functional
326
competence, post IVM is impaired. Two distinct categories of primordial follicles i.e first wave
327
and the adult primordial follicles seen in rodent and primate ovaries exhibit distinct
328
developmental dynamics and contribute differently to ovarian physiology and functionality [37,
329
38]. Hence, it is possible that pre-pubertal oocytes with less developmental capacity are more
330
susceptible to interventions such as IVM or vitrification. On the other hand, post-pubertal ovaries
331
have a new wave of primordial follicles with higher developmental capacity post IVM and
332
vitrification. It is important to note that this is the first report, where functional and
333
developmental competence of prepubertal oocytes were found diminished when IVM was done
334
before vitrification. However, the limitations of our study are i) functional ability of the oocytes
335
beyond fertilization was not tested ii) the oldest group used in this study D28 which is ‘young
15
336
adults’ or ‘sub adult’ and oocytes from animals beyond D28 was not assessed for ‘adult status’
337
and iii) in vitro growth (IVG) of oocytes within the follicles was not performed for the D14
338
group to overcome their very immature status.
339
340
Though these observations are in favor of GV stage oocyte vitrification, understanding the
341
mechanisms behind poor outcome in MII-V oocytes will help in modifying the current protocol
342
thereby retain their maximum structural and functional integrity to apply in fertility preservation
343
practice. It is to be noted here, with great emphasis, that a major limitation of this study is that
344
the oocytes’ abilities were tested only until fertilisation, as a consequence of which the study
345
cannot reveal the developmental potentials of the embryos beyond fertilisation.
346
Conflict of interest:
347
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
348
Author contribution statement:
349
Conceived and designed the experiments: SKA. Performed the experiments: AD. Analyzed the
350
data: AD, SU. Prepared/reviewed the manuscript: SKA, SU, GK, RT. AD is the guarantor of this
351
work and as such, had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the
352
data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
353
Acknowledgement
354
The authors thank IMPRINT (grant#4511) for providing project assistanceship to AD. Technical
355
support from Mrs. Shobha Uday Sonawane, Senior technical officer and Mrs. Reshma Santosh
356
Gaonkar, Technical officer, Confocal facility, NIRRH (ICMR), Mumbai is thankfully
357
acknowledged.
16
358 359
References
360 361 362
1. D.F. Albertini, A. Sanfins, C.M.H. Combelles, Origins and manifestations of oocyte maturation competencies, Reprod Biomed Online 6 (2003) 410-415.
363
2. R.A. Anderson, M. McLaughlin, W.H.B. Wallace, D.F. Albertini, E.E. Telfer, The immature
364
human ovary shows loss of abnormal follicles and increasing follicle developmental
365
competence through childhood and adolescence, Hum Reprod. 29 (2014) 97–106.
366 367 368 369
3. A. Borini, V. Bianchi, Cryopreservation of mature and immature oocytes, Clin Obstet Gynecol. 53 (2010) 763–774. 4. Y.X. Cao, R.C. Chian, Fertility preservation with immature and in vitro matured oocytes, Semin Reprod Med. 27 (2009) 456–64.
370
5. F. Chen, J. Lin, X. Sun, B. Xiao, S.-F. Ning, S. Zhu, H.-L. Wang, J.-H. Tan, Mechanisms by
371
which in vitro meiotic arrest and sexual maturity improve developmental potential of mouse
372
oocytes, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 15763.
373 374 375 376
6. A. Cobo, C. Diaz, Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials, Fertil Steril. 96 (2011) 277–285. 7. C.M. Cosgrove, R. Salani, Ovarian effects of radiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy damage, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 55 (2019) 37–48.
377
8. M.M. Dolmans, V. Luyckx , J. Donnez , C.Y. Andersen, T.Greve, Risk of transferring
378
malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue, Fertil Steril. 99 (2013) 1514–
379
1522.
380
9. R. Dumollard, M. Duchen, J. Carroll, The Role of Mitochondrial Function in the Oocyte and
17
381
Embryo, Curr Top Dev Biol. 77 (2007) 21–49.
382
10. G. Fasano, J. Dechène, R. Antonacci, J. Biramane, A.S. Vannin, et al., Outcomes of
383
immature oocytes collected from ovarian tissue for cryopreservation in adult and prepubertal
384
patients, Reprod Biomed Online 34 (2017) 575–582.
385 386 387 388 389 390
11. G. Fasano, I. Demeestere, Y. Englert, In-vitro maturation of human oocytes: Before or after vitrification?, J Assist Reprod Genet. 29 (2012) 507–512. 12. Y. Ghetler, E. Skutelsky, I. Ben Nun, L. Ben Dor, D. Amihai, R. Shalgi, Human oocyte cryopreservation and the fate of cortical granules, Fertil Steril. 86 (2006) 210–216. 13. D.A. Gook, D.H. Edgar, Human oocyte cryopreservation, Hum Reprod Update 13 (2007) 591–605.
391
14. S. Knight, A. Lorenzo, A.M. Maloney, A. Srikanthan, R. Donen, E. Greenblatt, et al., An
392
approach to fertility preservation in prepubertal and postpubertal females: A critical review
393
of current literature, Pediatr Blood Cancer 62 (2015) 935–939.
394
15. T. Kolbe, S. Sheety, I. Walter, R. Palme, T. Rülicke, Impact of superovulation and mating on
395
the wellbeing of juvenile and adult C57BL/6N mice, Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 28 (2016) 969–973.
396
16. N. Koutlaki, B. Schoepper, G. Maroulis, K. Diedrich, S. Al-Hasani, Human oocyte
397
cryopreservation: Past, present and future, Reprod Biomed Online 13 (2006) 427–436.
398
17. D. Kumar, D. Upadhya, S. Uppangala, S.R. Salian, G. Kalthur, S.K. Adiga, Nuclear DNA
399
fragmentation negatively affects zona binding competence of y bearing mouse spermatozoa,
400
J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 30 (2013) 1611–1615.
401 402 403
18. G.M. Lantinga, A.M.H. Simons, W.A. Kamps, A. Postma, Imminent ovarian failure in childhood cancer survivors, Eur J Cancer. 42 (2006) 1415–1420. 19. M.G.
Larman,
C.B.
Sheehan,
D.K.
Gardner, Calcium-free vitrification
18
reduces
404
cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse
405
oocytes, Reproduction 131 (2006) 53–61.
406
20. B. Lefèvre, E. Nagyova, A. Pesty, J. Testart, Acquisition of meiotic competence is related to
407
the functionality of the phosphoinositide/calcium signaling pathway in the mouse oocyte,
408
Exp. Cell Res. 236 (1997) 193–200.
409
21. T. Lei, N. Guo, M.H. Tan, Y.F. Li, Effect of mouse oocyte vitrification on mitochondrial
410
membrane potential and distribution, J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci. 34 (2014) 99–
411
102.
412
22. J. Liu, J. Van Der Elst, R. Van Den Broecke, F. Dumortier, M. Dhont, Maturation of mouse
413
primordial follicles by combination of grafting and in vitro culture, Biol. Reprod. 62 (2000)
414
1218–1223.
415
23. R. Ma, J. Zhang, X. Liu, L. Li, H. Liu, R. Rui, et al., Involvement of Rab6a in organelle
416
rearrangement and cytoskeletal organization during mouse oocyte maturation, Sci Rep. 6
417
(2016) 23560.
418 419 420 421
24. D. Nogueira, J.C. Sadeu, J. Montagut, In vitro oocyte maturation: Current status, Semin Reprod Med. 30 (2012) 199–213. 25. J.K. O’Brien, Developmental capacity, energy metabolism and ultrastructure of mature oocytes from prepubertal and adult sheep, Reprod Fertil Dev. 8 (1996) 1029–37.
422
26. G. Ptak, K. Matsukawa, C. Palmieri C, L.D. Salda, P.A. Scapolo, P. Loi, Developmental and
423
functional evidence of nuclear immaturity in prepubertal oocytes, Hum Reprod. 21 (2006)
424
2228–2237.
425
27. L. Rienzi, F. Martinez, F. Ubaldi, M.G. Minasi, M. Iacobelli, J. Tesarik, et al., Polscope
426
analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing
19
427
and thawing procedures, Hum Reprod. 19 (2004) 655–659.
428
28. L. Rienzi, S. Romano, L. Albricci, R. Maggiulli, A. Capalbo, E. Baroni, S. Colamaria, F.
429
Sapienza, F. Ubaldi, Embryo development of fresh “versus” vitrified metaphase II oocytes
430
after ICSI: A prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study, Hum. Reprod. 25 (2010) 66–73.
431
29. I. Segers, T. Adriaenssens, E. Ozturk, J. Smitz, Acquisition and loss of oocyte meiotic and
432
developmental competence during in vitro antral follicle growth in mouse, Fertil. Steril. 93
433
(2010) 2695–2700.
434 435 436 437
30. S. Silber, Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: scientific implications, J Assist Reprod Genet. 33 (2016) 1595–603. 31. M.A. Sirard, F. Richard, P. Blondin, C. Robert, Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality, Theriogenology 65 (2006) 126–136.
438
32. A.N. Tamura, T.T. Huang, Y. Marikawa, Impact of Vitrification on the Meiotic Spindle and
439
Components of the Microtubule-Organizing Center in Mouse Mature Oocytes, Biol Reprod.
440
89 (2013) 1–10.
441
33. S. Uppangala, S. Dhiman, S.R. Salian, V.J. Singh, G. Kalthur, S.K. Adiga, In vitro matured
442
oocytes are more susceptible than in vivo matured oocytes to mock ICSI induced functional
443
and genetic changes, PLoS One 10 (2015) e0119735.
444 445 446 447 448 449
34. P.M. Wassarman, L. Jovine, H. Qi, Z. Williams, C. Darie, E.S. Litscher, Recent aspects of mammalian fertilization research, Mol Cell Endocrinol. 234 (2005) 95–103. 35. A.J. Watson, Oocyte cytoplasmic maturation: a key mediator of oocyte and embryo developmental competence, J Anim Sci. 85 (2007) E1-E3. 36. M.X. Zarrow, E.D. Wilson, The influence of age on superovulation in the immature rat and mouse., Endocrinology. 69 (1961) 851–855.
20
450
37. W. Zheng, H. Zhang, N. Gorre, S. Risal, Y. Shen, K. Liu, Two classes of ovarian primordial
451
follicles exhibit distinct developmental dynamics and physiological functions, Hum Mol
452
Genet. 23 (2014) 920-928.
453
38. W. Zheng, H. Zhang, K. Liu, The two classes of primordial follicles in the mouse ovary: their
454
development, physiological functions and implications for future research, Mol Hum Reprod.
455
20 (2014) 286-292.
456 457 458
Figure legends
459 460
Figure 1 Age, in vitro maturation potential and vitrification-warming survival. (a) Oocyte
461
maturation potential of non-vitrified (teal bar) (N=468, 274, 218; D14, D21, D28 respectively)
462
and vitrified germinal vesicle (orange bar) (N=374, 273, 221; D14, D21, D28 respectively) to
463
MII in relation to the age. (b) Survival rate of GV stage vitrification-warming (teal bar) (N=351,
464
264, 205; D14, D21, D28 respectively) and in vitro matured MII oocytes vitrification-warming
465
(orange bar) (N=212, 209, 150; D14, D21, D28 respectively).
466
Figure 2 IVM prior to vitrification-warming alters spindle morphology (a) Meiotic spindle
467
abnormalities (D14: N=55,41,43; D21: N=50,33,46; D28: N=30,35,32 Control, GV-V and MII-
468
V respectively) Control (teal bar); GV-V (orange bar); MII-V (green bar). (b) Schematic
469
representation of spindle abnormalities in MII oocytes (40X). Please note that i-iv represents
470
normal spindle structure and v-xii represent abnormal forms. Scale bar=20um.
471
Figure 3 Mitochondrial potential in GV-V and MII-V oocytes (a) Mitochondrial potential
472
(JC-1 ratio) (D14: N=125,85,87; D21: N=62,75,93; D28: N=54,44,40 Control, GV-V and MII-V 21
473
respectively) Control (teal bar); GV-V (orange bar); MII-V (green bar). (b) Fluorescent
474
microscopic images (40X) of oocytes stained by JC-1 in reducing order of mitochondrial
475
potential: Scale bar=20um.
476
Figure 4 Cortical granule redistribution in vitrified prepubertal oocytes (a) Cortical granule
477
free domain (CGFD) (D14: N=33,25,26; D21: N=28,26,27; D28: N=29,26,31 Control, GV-V
478
and MII-V respectively) Control (teal bar); GV-V (orange bar); MII-V (green bar). (b) Confocal
479
microscopic images (40X) of oocytes stained by LCA showing CGFD: Scale bar=20um.
480
Figure 5 MII-V oocytes had decreased sperm-zona binding and fertilizing abilities (a)
481
Sperm zona binding ability (D14: N=25,20,24; D21: N=30,27,22; D28: N=20,26,22; Control,
482
GV-V and MII-V respectively) and (b) fertilization rate (D14 N=56,50,46; D21 N=45,44,37;
483
D28 N=40,37,42; Control, GV-V and MII-V respectively). Control (teal bar); GV-V (orange
484
bar); MII-V (green bar).
485
22