Glucose intolerance during ethynodiol diacetate—Mestranol therapy

Glucose intolerance during ethynodiol diacetate—Mestranol therapy

Glucose Intolerance During Ethynodiol Mestranol -Therapy Diacetate- B:/ GEORGEK. HALLING, EDWARD L. MICHALS AND C. ALVIK PAULSEN Administration of a...

289KB Sizes 2 Downloads 96 Views

Glucose Intolerance During Ethynodiol Mestranol -Therapy

Diacetate-

B:/ GEORGEK. HALLING, EDWARD L. MICHALS AND C. ALVIK PAULSEN Administration of a “19-nor” progestinestrogen combination, ethynodiol diacetate and mestranol, produced reversible carbohydrate intolerance in 40 per cent of 15 women tested. No correlation was noted between those subjects with a ge-

S

long-term

INCE poses

change

has

Some have

studies

the

onset

of norethynodrel

treatment

acceptance, Recently,

evaluation.

glucose

control of

for contraceptive

any

reports

during

tolerance

do not specifically

as pretreatment

noted

course

widespread

careful

decreased

of these

alteration

oral progestin-estrogen

attained

warrants

document

netic predisposition to diabetes mellitus by history and the impaired tolerance. The over-all significance of these findings remains to be determined. (Metabolism 16: No. 5, May, 465-468, 1967)

associated have

appeared

progestin-estrogen

relate

treatment

data were 1acking.l.”

impaired

carbohydrate

and mestranol

therapy

tolerance in certain

which therapy.

to this

However,

pur-

metabolic

metabolic

other workers after

patients

a 30-day who were

normal prior to treatment.4,j The patient therapy

demonstration

of a frankly

with monilial prompted

were receiving

vaginitis

us to study

diabetic

while

oral glucose

on cyclic

carbohydrate

tolerance

ethynodiol tolerance

curve

in a

diacetate-mestranol

in those

patients

who

this preparation. METHODS

Fifteen patients on progestin-estrogen therapy were selected from our Endocrine Clinic for stndy. Thirteen women were taking ethynodiol diacetate-mestranol combination’ in cvclic fashion, i.e., one tablet each day from the 5th to the 25th day of the menstrrlal cycle. The indications for treatment were the presence of menstrual irregularities and/or the desire for ovulation inhibition. Two patients were on continuous daily treatment for From the Department of Medicine, Uniuersity of Washington Division of Endocrinology, USPHS Hospital, Se&e, Washington.

School of Medicine

and

Supported in part by NIH grants ROl AM05436 and Tl AM05161 and a grant-in-uid from G. D. Searle and Co. Receiued for pablication December 1.5, 1966. CEOHCE R. HALLING, M.D.: Post-doctoral trainee in endocrinology, currently with the Sunta Barbara Medical Clinic, Santa Barbara, Calif. EDWARD L. MICHALS, M.D.: Senior Surgeon, Assistunt Chief of Medicine, USPHS Hospital, Seattle, Washington. C. ALVIN PAULSEN, M.D.: Associate Professor of Medicine, Dept. of Medicine, Uniuersity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. These .stndies confirm and extend obseruations of others which suggest that certain of the newer agettts designed fo regulate oordation commonly cause mild impairment of oral glcrcose tolerance. As the authors point orrt, data are not yet adequate to determine precisely the frequency

of these aberrations. their cause, or their significance.-K.

M. W.

DhletrulenB was supplied by G. D. Searle and Co. Each tah!et contains 2 mg. ethynodiol tliacetate and 0.1 mg. mestranol. 46.5

466

HA.LLING,

MICHALS

AND

PAULSEN

Table l.-Two-Hour Cyclic

Serum Glucose Levels in Patients Receiving Ethynodiol Diacetate-Mestranol Therapy Serum

Patient

Duration of Therapy (No. of Cycles)

Age

J. C.’ P. K.

44

;:: M. M.

50 32 49

G. A. K. A. H.

G.= E. P. C. D.

37 34 41 37 22

B. N. D. M.’

34 24

F. McC. V. B.*

52 30

M. K.

27

17 19

42

Table 2.-Oral

123 -

163 145 168

105 -

-66 107

158 100 120 108 108

-

-

92 104

-

-

12 27

134 113

-

-

3

80

-

-

43 Continuous 48 months

or history of having

Time After 100 Gm. Oral Glucose (min.)

Patient

P. K. (42 yrs.)

NO Medication

Mestranol

a large baby

82

( >9#).

Cyclic

Glucose Tolerance Levels in Patients Receiving Ethynodiol Diucetate-Mestranol Therapy

J. C. (44 yrs.)

%)

108 89

Serum

#See footnote

(mg.

210 165

25 10 Continuous 40 months 29 20 10 29 3

*Subjects with a diabetic relative See footnote on page 465.

Glucose

Ethyncdiol Diacetate + Mestranolt

Glucose

(mg.

Ethynodiol Diaeetate + YeBtranol’

%)

No Medication

0

106

100

30 60 90 120 180

172 234 252 210 156

155 175 147 123 120

0 60

68 160

-

120

165

89

on page 465.

estrogen replacement. Duration of therapy is listed in Table 1 for each patient. Glucose tolerance was tested at varying days of the treatment cycle, but always between the 17th and 25th day. After a three-day 300-Gm. carbohydrate diet preparation, serum was obtained two hours following the ingestion of 100 Gm. of glucose, and the true serum glucose was estimated by the autoanalyzer technique. Fasting levels were determined in two

soon after progestin administration

the carbohydrate

abnormality

developed.

patients. The ethynodiol diacetate-mestranol combination was discontinued in those patients who demonstrated a two-hour serum glucose value above 140-mg. per cent. Such patients were then restudied in a similar manner 17 to 25 days later while on either no medication or mestranol alone (0.1 mg. daily).

MESTRANOL

467

THERAPY RESULTS

Six of the fifteen patients (40 per cent) showed an abnormal two-hour glucose level while receiving progestin therapy (Table 1). Two of these patients (J.C., P. K.) had modified glucose tolerance tests which revealed normal fasting levels (Table 2). All of the six patients, when retested, demonstrated normal two hour serum glucose levels (Table 1). The group of patients with impaired glucose tolerance had received hormonal therapy for an average of 23 cycles (range 1040) while the group with normal glucose tolerance had been on therapy for an average of 16 cycles (range 343). Four patients had either a positive family history for diabetes mellitus or gave a history of having large babies, i.e., greater than nine pounds. Two of these patients demonstrated abnormal carbohydrate tolerance, and in the group without such a history, four out of eleven patients demonstrated imparied carbohydrate tolerance while on progestin therapy. DISCXJSSION

A significant number of our patients on long-term ethynodiol diacetatemestranol therapy demonstrated impaired carbohydrate tolerance which reverted to normal when treatment was discontinued. Fasting glucose levels during treatment were unaffected in the two patients so tested; and with the exception of two patients (J. C., G. G.) who had monilial vaginitis, no signs or symptoms consistent with diabetes mellitus were noted. Since our patients were not examined longitudinally during therapy, we are unable to state how soon after progestin administration the carbohydrate abnormality developed. However, when comparing the duration of treatment in those patients with abnormal glucose levels with those whose levels remained normal, there appears to be no significant difference in time. Furthermore, the published data which demonstrated the occurrence of elevated glucose levels during the first cycle of progestin therapy indicate that these changes may occur promptly.4-“i Our patient sample size is too small to tell whether or not individuals with a diabetic family history are more prone to develop carbohydrate intolerance following progestin treatment. Previous studies also fail to clarify this point.” Three patients who demonstrated abnormal serum sugar levels while on the progestin-estrogen combination had normal glucose levels when placed on mestranol alone. This observation indicates that the progestin in some manner was responsible for the abnormality in carbohydrate metabolism. Progesterone administration apparently lacks this ability.7 Since diethylstilbestrol treatment in daily doses of 5 mg. has been shown to cause similar alterations in carbohydrate tolerance,” it may be that estrogenic compounds have this property at certain dose levels. Synthetic progestins of the “19-nor” category are inherently estrogenic .8 Therefore, the addition of progestins of this type to a potent estrogen such as mestranol may merely increase endogenous estrogen levels to that point where carbohydrate intolerance develops. The mechanism by which the progestin-estrogen combinations and estrogens alone elevate blood sugar levels is not clear. Buchler and Warren6 found no change

468

HALLING,

MICHALS

AND

PAULSEN

in the K value after intravenous glucose tolerance testing before and after norethynodrel-mestranol therapy, in spite of the presence of carbohydrate intolerance. On the other hand, Posner et al.’ demonstrated a significant drop in the K value after only one treatment cycle with the same preparation. Moreover, Spellacy and Carlson” demonstrated an increase in radioimmunoassayable insulin in patients receiving norethynodrel-mestranol combination therapy. These data indicate that these compounds do indeed exert a postprandial hyperglycemic effect which may be related to an interference with insulin ac’tivity. Since the consequence of chronically elevated postprandial blood sugar levels are not known, the significance of these findings remains to be determined. In the meantime any patient on long-term estrogen-progestin therapy should be periodically tested for glucose intolerance. REFERENCES 1. Besch, P. K., Vorys, N., Stevens, V., and Barry,

Ullery, J. C., R. D.: Some

systemic effects of a progestational agent. Metabolism 14:387-396, 1965. 2. Gershberg, H., Javier, Z., and Hulse, M.: Glucose tolerance in women on ovulatory suppressants. Diabetes 13:378382, 1964. 3. Peterson, W. F., Steel, M. W., and Coyne, R. V.: Analysis of the effects of ovulatory suppressants on glucose tolerance. Amer. J. Obstet. 488, 1966.

& Gynecol.

95:484-

4. Posner, N. A., Silverstone, F. A., Pomerante, W., and Baumgold, D.: Oral contraceptives and intravenous glucose tolerance. I. Data noted in early treatment. Obstet. & Gynecol. 29:79, 1967. 5. Spellacy, W. N., and Carbon, K. L.:

Plasma insulin and blood glucose levels in patients taking oral contraceptives. Am. J. Obstet. 1966.

& Gynecol.

95:474478,

6. Buchler, D., and Warren, J. C.: Effects of estrogen on glucose tolerance. Am. J. Obstet. and Gynecol. 95:479-483, 1966. 7. Lloyd, C. W.: The Ovaries. In Textbook of Endocrinology, R. H. Williams, Ed. Philadelphia, Pa., W. B. Saunders Co., 1963, p. 452. 8. Paulsen, C. A., Leach, R. B., Lanman, J., Goldston, N., Maddock, W. O., and Heller, C. G.: Inherent estrogenicity of norethindrone and norethynodrel: comparison with other synthetic progestins and progesterone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 22:1033-1039, 1962.