Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
GLUCCJSE PGLYKEXISBTION H.Hile, Physiol.-Chem.
Received
February
Hilz,
1962)
on a simpler
der Universitat
concerning
polysaccharide 1960,
lead
model
rat
hormones.
Inspite
been made
tion
into
Weber, is
known
the
glucose
sol
the
of
#
some aspects
of
is
the
glucocorticoid
induction
(cf.
processes acid
1961;
Hiibener,
trsnsforma-
practically in
the
question et
and the
system
and their
1960; nothing
Latschinski
activities in
formation
amino
hormones
the
stimulated
for
enzyme
glycogen
strongly
test
the
problem
rle choose
glycogen
and others),
itself
the
that
way from
of
(cf.
fact
enzyme
concentrations
(G- 6-P)
tissue
Peigelson,
influence
therefore
on a1.,1961). corres-
glucose-6-
behavior
after
corti-
administration. Injection
lectomieed
of a suspension rats
concentration to
(cf.
of glucocorticoids
connective
which
on the
polymerisation
substrate
phosphate
of
1962,
the
We determined ponding
units
blatzelt,
about
liver,
a number
probable
glucose
1961;
Deutschland
synthesis.
as a biological
and although
habe
study
polysaccharide
by these
used
influence
of in
action,
Hamburg,
in
us to
formation
routinely
the
metabolism
glycogen
is
P. Arend
1963
12,
Experiments on the
AND COBTISOL
Y. Tarnowskiand
Institut
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
a 40 fold
G-l-P
in
a single
of dose
cortisol leads
already
after
30 min.
increase
(fig.
1).
and finally
of glycogen
492
into
to an increase
which
A (less follows,
acetate
after
in
6 hrs.
drastic) whereas
adrena-
increase the
G-6-P-
amounts of
concentration
Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
of
the
imr;iediate
(UDPG) the 0
BIOCHEMICAL
is
glycogen
strongly
glycogen
AND BIOPHYSICAL
precursor
decreased.
content
of
the
uridine
diphosphoglucose
glucose
rises
Blood liver
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
also
starts
only
when
to increase.
I oc
zoog
4t
?-----
G-6-p
1
2
Pip.
1:
6
A
Theeffect
of cortisol
40
8
on the
system
Ip-s. post i+ctionem G-6-P
+
glycogen.
Male rats (-200 gm) were adrenalectomixed and injected with cortisol acetate suspension (2,5 mg/lOO gm), on the day,after a 14 hrs. fast. At the time indicated, they were decapitated after a blow on the head, the livers rapidly removed, and three homogenates from weighted pieces were prepared: One for enzyme detns. with 0.25 m sucrose-O.001 m BDTA, one for substrate tests with 4 % HClO , and one for glycogen phosphorylase with a solution contain&g 0.1 m NaF-0.005 m A detailed account of the methods employed will appear I%%&re (Biochem.2.) . The changes are expressed in $ of the starting point (adrenalect., without cortisol), rind all values are based on DNA content. Xach point represents 4-16 animals.
In the
contrast
activities
to the of
the
marked enzymes
changes
at
the
phosphoglucomutase, 493
substrate
levels,
UDPG-pyro-
Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
BIOCHEMICAL
phosphorylase, little,
glycogen
if
any,
AND BIOPHYSICAL
phosphorylase,
increase
except
the
onset
measured
of
with
increase
apparently
the
have
shown,
our
(different)
labelled
that
but of
the
action
G-6-P
G-6-P
the
very
of
cortisol
concentration activator
from
should
very
primarily If
the
synthetase
present.
in
the
homogenate
as a basis,
elevated
But
addition,
in
itself,
G-6-P
is
The effectivity
Soon
nearly
after
1) Purified
indicate "G-6-P 1962).
of by the the
this
increase
in
of
the
system
rise
values
in of
activity determined
the
synthetase
be about
of
the
point.
lo-fold.
enzyme The overall
by a factor
the
our
the
would
this
than
increase
of
stimulation
G-6-P,
in
by increasing
therefore
behavior
this
an increase
combined
to less
as a rapid
the
for
shows a
stimulation
at
C-14we could
1) . Since
6 hrs.
doubled
may be increased
demonstrated
at
one observes
which
activity
the
With
of
amounts
one takes
niveau
synthetase.
levels,
act
et a1.(1959)
homogenate
first low
early,
of a cofactor
which
an
one has to
glycogen),
the
visible
of
by the
the
preparation
is
Here,
properties
activity
activated
such
As Leloir
into
G-6-P,
1959),
the
(incorporation
has the
small
fully
of
(UDPG)
Without
Leloir,
Nevertheless,
G-6-P.
assay
glucose"
(cf.
elevated
activity,
to explain
an activator of
enzyme
of glycogen. of
(GDPG-
significantly
G-6-P
sufficient
role
method
enzyme.
l/30
not
is
6 hrs.
formation
is
"active
definite,
the
is
G-6-P
liver
after
stimulating
demonstrate the
twofold
of
show only
synthetase
This
levels
and rapid
consider
synthesis.
saturating
nearly
efficient,
, which
glycogen
increased
and G-6-P*ase
glycogen
glycogen-1,4-transglucosylase) at
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of 20.
is
clearly
substrate
UDPG:
system
partially
is
synthetase behaves in a similar way. These results at the same time that in rat liver, practically no independent“ transglucosylase is present (cf.Friedman,
494
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
deprived
from its
AND BIOPHYSICAL
"active
increasing
levels
merisation
runs faster
glucose"
inspite
of G-l-P are formed.
therefore
indicate
formation
of G-6-P (by an yet unknown mechanism).
creased
cortisol
of the fact
polymerisation
achieved
proper
by an increased
induces
primarily
is a secondary
activity
G-6-P,
the The in-
process
which is
of the enzyme synthetase
coming about in two ways: 1) by an elevated the activator
that
Apparently, the polyis made1) . Our results
than the supply
that
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
concentration
and 2) by an (inductive?)
of
augmentation
of the enzyme protein 2) . The latter
point
the augmentation one is inclined hormonal
is caused.
as the result
of the synthetase
This fact,
the increase
it
Since,
after
sight,
of a direct in glycogen
can be suppressed
is not necessarily
however,
above.
At first rise
ethionine
in G-6-P is also suppressed,
of cortisol
by which factor
since the cortisol-induced
and the augmentation the explanation
to the question
of the synthetase to consider
action,
ethionine.
leads
by
in favor
of
administration,
the decisive
not only must be sought at an earlier
action
stage of
glycogen formation from protein: the failure of the different enzyme levels to rise (esp. synthetase, later on phosphoglucomutase, indirect
G-6-P'ase
consequence
one considers factor that
for
could also be interpreted
of the hormone action,
the G-6-P concentration
the glycogen
an increase
by injection
etc.)
then namely,
as the deciding
system. In fact, in G-6-P which was not hormonally
(or feeding)
formation
of glucose
as an cybernetic
we could show induced, but
to adrenalectomized
1) It is not clear yet if there is also an additional 2) UTP. A last proof for a true induction process is still although a number of tests make it very probable. 495
when
rats, need for lacking,
Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
produced
BIOCHEMICAL
alterations
similar
AND BIOPHYSICAL
in the system G-6-P +
to the cortisol-induced
increase
in G-6-P concentration
in synthetase here,
too,
substrate
(measured
is followed
by a true
a metabolite
activation"
in an early it
rapid
increase And that
the
exhausted. may be described
best by the
induction":
stage of the glucose
probably
a primary
of G-6-P).
and "precursor
not only is an activator
enzyme synthetase;
levels
very
runs so effectively
UDPG becomes partially
terms "precursor chain,
too,
synthesis
these findings
glyoogen
ones. Here,
at saturating
the glycogen
At present,
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(G-6-P,
polymerisation
of the irreversibly
acting
also acts as an inducer
key
of the
same enzyme'). How far these phenomena bear connections to the action cortisol on mucopolysaccharide and glycoprotein synthesis, remains for
to be determined.
We thank Dr. C. Erich, Dr. H. Kirsig, carrying out some of the determinations. Mbit Untersttitzung
der Deutschen
and M. v. Gossler
Forschungsgemeinschaft.
BFXEXENCES Feigelson, Friedman,
Congress Biochem., Moscow 1961. P., V. Intern. D.L. and J. Larner, Biochim.Biophys.Acta 64, 185 (1962).
1) A definite
decision on induction" mechanism is system. The increase in could also be due, for level provocated by the
the existence of a true "precursor only possible with an isolated the (fully activated) synthetase instance, to an increased insulin rise in blood glucose. 496
of
Vol. 10, No. 6, 1963
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Hilz, H., J.Atheroscler.Res. 2, 252 (1962). Bile, H. and D. Utermann, Bi0chem.Z. B, 376 (1960). Hiibener, H.J., Hoppe-Seyler's Z.physiol.Chem. 322, 135 (1960). Leloir,L.F., J.Y. Olavarria, S.H. Goldenberg and H. Carminatti, Arch.Biochem.Biophys. 81, 508 (1959). Matschinski, F., U. Meyer and 0. Wieland, Klin.Wschr. 2, 818 (1961). Matzelt, D., A. Oriol-Bosch and K.D. Voigt, Bi0chem.Z. 222, 485 (1962). Weber, G., G. Banerjee and S.B. Bronstein, Biochem.Biophys.Res. Commun. 4, 332 (1961).
497