Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era

Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era

Accepted Manuscript Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era Moaath Mustafa Ali, MD, Lisa Rybicki, MS, Laila Nomani, MD, Basel Rouph...

1MB Sizes 99 Downloads 171 Views

Accepted Manuscript Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era Moaath Mustafa Ali, MD, Lisa Rybicki, MS, Laila Nomani, MD, Basel Rouphail, MD, MBA, Robert M. Dean, MD, Brian T. Hill, MD, PhD, Deepa Jagadeesh, MD, MPH, Brad Pohlman, MD, Eric D. Hsi, MD, Mitchell R. Smith, MD, PhD PII:

S2152-2650(17)30745-0

DOI:

10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.002

Reference:

CLML 973

To appear in:

Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia

Received Date: 28 April 2017 Revised Date:

6 July 2017

Accepted Date: 6 July 2017

Please cite this article as: Ali MM, Rybicki L, Nomani L, Rouphail B, Dean RM, Hill BT, Jagadeesh D, Pohlman B, Hsi ED, Smith MR, Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era, Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.002. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era

2

Moaath Mustafa Ali, MD1; Lisa Rybicki, MS2; Laila Nomani, MD3; Basel Rouphail, MD, MBA4;

3

Robert M. Dean, MD4; Brian T. Hill, MD, PhD4; Deepa Jagadeesh, MD, MPH4; Brad Pohlman,

4

MD4; Eric D. Hsi, MD3; Mitchell R. Smith, MD, PhD4,5

5

RI PT

1

1

7

Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH; 3 Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory

8

Medicine Institute; 4Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH;

9

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 5 Present address: George Washington Cancer Center,

M AN U

10

Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 2Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland

SC

6

Washington DC.

TE D

11

12



No funding to report

13



Correspondence:

Mitchell R. Smith, MD, PhD

15

George Washington University Cancer Center

16

800 22nd St NW, Suite 8000

AC C

EP

14

Washington, D.C. 20052

17

Phone Number: (202) 994-3517

18

Email: [email protected]

19

20



Brief running title: Grade 3 Follicular lymphoma

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT



Previous presentation: Study results were presented, in part, at the American Society of



Number of words: 1583

24



Abstract = 240 words

25



Microabstract = 60 words

26



Tables = 4

27



Figures = 2

SC

23

RI PT

Hematology Annual Meeting, December, 2015, Orlando, Florida.

22

28

M AN U

21

Conflict of interest statement:

30

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest pertaining to this study.

33 34 35 36 37 38

EP

32

AC C

31

TE D

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

MicroAbstract:

40

Whether to clinically approach follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3 as an indolent

41

or aggressive lymphoma, especially since the introduction of rituximab, is

42

unclear. Our experience with FL grade 3A, compared with FL grade 3B or with concomitant

43

diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primarily treated with R-CHOP suggests possible long-term

44

remissions. This must be confirmed with longer follow-up and additional studies.

SC

RI PT

39

45

Abstract

47

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is heterogeneous. While FL3B is treated as aggressive

48

lymphoma, an optimal approach to FL3A remains unclear as little data exist on clinical

49

outcomes based on sub-classification of FL grade 3 since introduction of rituximab. We report

50

outcomes of FL grade 3 in the rituximab era.

51

Methods: We identified and analyzed a retrospective cohort of 53 patients with FL grade 3A, 3B

52

and FL grade 3 with areas of DLBCL. They were divided into two groups: aggressive lymphoma

53

(aggFL) (n=21) included patients with FL3B (n=10) and FL3 (A or B) with concomitant DLBCL

54

(n=11); indolent lymphoma (n=32) included only FL3A.

55

Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. R-CHOP was initial

56

treatment in 79% of patients with aggFL and 72% of those with FL3A; rituximab was included in

57

initial therapy in 95% and 83%, respectively. Comparing aggFL and FL3A, 5-year overall survival

58

(OS) was 90% vs. 79% (P= 0.97) and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) 44% vs 34% (P=0.75),

59

respectively.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

46

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Conclusion: We conclude that outcomes for FL grade 3, primarily treated with R-CHOP, do not

61

differ between FL3A and aggFL (FL3B and FL3/DLBCL). The aggFL group showed a plateau in PFS

62

confirming these should be treated with curative intent. FL3A patients, mainly managed with R-

63

CHOP, also show an apparent plateau in PFS. While longer follow-up and confirmation in other

64

datasets is required, this indicates potential under-treatment of FL3A with less aggressive

65

regimens often used for indolent lymphoma.

66

Keywords: Follicular Lymphoma Grade 3, Diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma, Outcomes, Rituximab

SC

RI PT

60

M AN U

67

AC C

EP

TE D

68

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Introduction

70

Follicular lymphoma (FL) comprises a heterogeneous group of histologic subtypes with varied

71

clinical and pathologic characteristics that are derived from germinal center B-cells and

72

generally retain a nodular growth pattern. Follicular lymphoma is classified into FL grade 1, 2

73

and 3 based on the number of centroblasts by routine histologic assessment. Grade 3 FL has

74

more than 15 centroblasts per high power field; it can be sub-classified as 3A when centrocytes

75

are intermixed with centroblasts and 3B when there are solid sheets of centroblasts 1. These 2

76

groups have distinct cytomorphologic, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic profiles 2-4.

77

Despite consensus on the aggressive nature of FL3B 4-6, the behavior of FL3A remains an area of

78

debate, with some studies suggesting an indolent non-curable disease while others suggest a

79

potentially curable lymphoma 5-9. Most of these studies used anthracycline based regimens

80

with variable rituximab incorporation

81

Due to mixed results regarding clinical behavior of FL3A and 3B and lack of data in the

82

immunochemotherapy era, we compared patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, PFS,

83

and overall survival (OS) between 2 groups largely treated with rituximab based regimens: FL

84

3A and an aggressive follicular lymphoma (aggFL) group in which we included FL3B as well as

85

any FL3 that contained areas of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

86

RI PT

69

87

Methods

88

Study population and Materials

89

We identified 72 patients with FL3 in the lymphoma database of the Taussig Cancer institute of

90

the Cleveland Clinic. We excluded patients who had unclassified FL 3 (N=13). Pathology material

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

was available for review for 23 patients, of whom 6 were excluded as review demonstrated

92

non-FL3 diagnosis. The remaining cohort included 53 patients diagnosed between 4/1998-

93

7/2014 with FL3A (n=32), FL3B (n=10), FL3A with DLBCL (n=3), FL3B with DLBCL (n=5) and

94

unclassified FL3 with DLBCL (n= 3). Patients with FL3B and FL3 with areas of DLBCL were

95

analyzed as a single group termed aggFL. Transformation was defined as change of FL 3A or 3B

96

at presentation to more aggressive lymphoma confirmed by histopathology at a later date.

97

Patients who transformed after diagnosis were analyzed per initial categorization.

98

Transformation to DLBCL occurred in 6 patients in FL3A group and 4 patients in aggFL group.

99

The diagnosis of FL 3 subtypes was established at the time of initial consultation by an expert

M AN U

SC

RI PT

91

hematopathologist at our institution based on WHO classification 10. As noted, 17 were

101

reconfirmed for this report on available material. Response to chemotherapy was determined

102

using the revised International Working Group Criteria11. The study was approved by Cleveland

103

Clinic Institutional Review Board.

104

Statistical analysis

105

Nominal categorical variables were compared between FL3A and aggFL using Fisher’s exact

106

test, ordinal categorical variables with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and continuous variables

107

with Wilcoxon rank sum test. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS after diagnosis. The

108

event for OS was all-cause mortality and events for PFS were progression or all-cause mortality.

109

Both outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups

110

using the log-rank test. Time to transformation, time to bone marrow transplant, and time to

111

progression after diagnosis were estimated using cumulative incidence methods and compared

112

between FL groups using the Gray test. Univariable prognostic factors for OS and PFS were

AC C

EP

TE D

100

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis; results were summarized as the hazard ratio

114

(HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable analysis was not performed for OS due to

115

insufficient events. Because of few events for PFS, only 2-variable models could be performed

116

(not shown). The log-rank test was used for variables where HR could not be calculated.

117

Analyses were done using SAS Software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All tests were two-

118

sided, and P<0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.

SC

RI PT

113

119

Results

121

Patient characteristics

122

Baseline characteristics in FL3A group and aggFL group were similar (Table 1). Our cohort

123

included 53 patients diagnosed with FL 3A and aggFL with a median follow up of 54 (0.5-204)

124

months. The median age was 60 (19-85) years, 57% (n= 30) of patients were females. Fifteen

125

patients (28%) had limited stage disease (Ann Arbor Stage ≤ II).

126

Outcomes

127

Table 2 describes therapy and outcomes. Around 10% of patients were managed initially by

128

watchful waiting. Initial therapy started at a median of 0.9 months after diagnosis and almost

129

three quarters of patients received R-CHOP as first line therapy. Ten patients (19%) have died

130

during follow up. There were no significant differences between FL3A and aggFL in terms of

131

PFS (P=0.75; Fig 1) and OS (P=0.97; Fig 2). There was an apparent plateau in PFS after 4 years.

132

Time to transformation (P=0.87) and progression (P=0.29) also did not differ between FL3A and

133

aggFL (Table 2).

134

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

120

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Prognostic factors for overall survival and progression-free survival

136

In univariable analysis (Table 3), three variables were associated with greater risk of mortality:

137

older age (HR 1.76 per 10-year increase in age, P=0.05), ECOG PS 2-3 (HR 6.73, P=0.037), and

138

para-aortic nodal site (HR 4.19, P=0.039). Four variables were associated with shorter PFS:

139

larger nodal dimension (HR 1.24 per 1 cm increase, P=0.002), iliac nodal site (HR 2.84, P=0.011),

140

spleen nodal site (HR 2.69, P=0.047), and bone marrow involvement (HR 2.43, P=0.038).

SC

RI PT

135

M AN U

141

Discussion

143

There is no consensus on whether FL3A should be categorized as an indolent or aggressive form

144

of NHL. Our study of FL3 subtypes largely treated with rituximab demonstrates that FL3A

145

biologic behavior was similar to FL3B, with the potential to be treated with curative intent. In a

146

cohort of 462 patients with FL, Wahlin et al 5 demonstrated that FL3A had a clinical course

147

similar to FL 1 and 2 with frequent relapses and no plateau in OS, in contrast to FL3B with a

148

plateau in OS after 5 years. Only 17 of these patients received rituximab upfront and 45% at any

149

time; multivariable analysis for regimens used showed that only receiving rituximab improved

150

OS (HR: 0.3, CI: 01.-0.6) compared to other regimens. Sushtik et al 6concluded that both FL3A

151

and 3B were incurable with no plateau demonstrated in OS or disease specific survival (DSS)

152

curves, despite an apparent plateau in DSS after ~ 7 years. Rituximab was included with initial

153

therapy in 1/3 of patients. In contrast to previous findings, Koch et al 7 demonstrated no

154

statistically significant difference in PFS between 47 patients diagnosed with FL3A and 14

155

patients diagnosed with FL3B. They also concluded that chemotherapy may induce durable

AC C

EP

TE D

142

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

remission in FL3A with a plateau in PFS ~ 7 years. Rituximab was used in 59% of their FL3A and

157

36% of FL3B patients. Analyzing only the 27 patients with FL3A and 5 patients with FL3B

158

treated with induction R-CHOP demonstrated a plateau in survival after 4 years. In a Japanese

159

study, 47 patients with FL3A and 5 patients with 3B had 10-year OS of 100%, however, no

160

plateau was observed in FL 3A despite having all patients treated with rituximab-based

161

regimens 12.

162

Use of rituximab has revolutionized therapy for B cell lymphoma, improving both PFS and OS 13,

163

14

164

response to chemotherapy in patients with indolent NHL including FL improved PFS, but not OS,

165

probably because patients received subsequent rituximab. That trial used the Working

166

Formulation to classify indolent lymphoma, but follicular large cell was an exclusion 15.

167

Published data on outcomes for FL grade 3 (Table 4) indicate the 5-year OS for FL3A and 3B is

168

approximately 70%, with one quarter of patients having received rituximab with induction 5, 6.

169

In contrast, our study and more recent reports in which rituximab based induction was used

170

more frequently showed a 5-year OS > 80% for FL3A and 3B. Whether the apparent plateau in

171

PFS for FL3A and improved 5-year OS for both FL3A and 3B are due, at least in part, to earlier

172

rituximab use is not entirely clear and remains a question for future investigation. Importantly

173

due to recent randomized trials, management of indolent NHL has shifted from R-CHOP to

174

bendamustine with rituximab for frontline treatment 16, 17. However, in both the BRIGHT and

175

StiL trials, only FL grade 1 and 2 were included. In our data set of 32 patients with FL3A, 29

176

received therapy, 21 (72%) of whom received R-CHOP. As the non-R-CHOP group was only 8

SC

RI PT

156

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

. A randomized trial showed that maintenance rituximab compared to observation after

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

non-uniformly treated patients, we cannot assess whether R-CHOP is better therapy in our

178

population.

179

In our study, mortality was higher in patients who were elderly, had poor performance status

180

and who had para-aortic LN involvement. Advanced age has been associated with poor

181

outcomes in several studies 5. Bone marrow involvement may predict higher mortality 5, but

182

this was not shown in our study. LN size and disease location were important prognostic

183

indicators in our dataset, with iliac LN, spleen and BM involvement negatively impacting PFS.

184

Finally, there are several limitations of our study, as it is a single-institution experience with a

185

relatively small number of patients and, being retrospective, it is missing data on some

186

important factors, specifically ability to re-review all pathology material. Median follow-up is

187

only 54 months. A multi-institutional collaboration with pathology-confirmed cases and

188

adequate follow-up is necessary to understand the natural history of this disease.

189

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

177

Conclusion

191

With the caveats of having a relatively small sample size from a single institution, this study

192

demonstrates that FL3A may have better 5-year OS than previously reported. Moreover, an

193

apparent plateau in the PFS curve after 4 years suggests FL3A might be potentially curable,

194

resembling FL3B. Prospective studies of histologically confirmed FL3A in the rituximab, and

195

now targeted therapy, era are warranted, particularly regarding the use of BR or R-CHOP. These

196

will require multi-institutional cooperation.

197 198

AC C

EP

190

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

199

200

Clinical practice points: •

While follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3B is treated as aggressive lymphoma, an optimal approach to FL grade 3A remains unclear as little data exist on clinical outcomes based

202

on sub-classification of FL grade 3 since introduction of rituximab. •

plateau in progression free survival similar to follicular lymphoma 3B.

204 205

Patients in our cohort with FL 3A, mainly managed with R-CHOP, showed an apparent



SC

203

RI PT

201

These data suggest that FL 3A may be best approached as an aggressive lymphoma with R-CHOP to attain durable remissions. Whether less intense regimens such as

207

bendamustine-rituximab as used for indolent FL might result in similar results is

208

unknown.

M AN U

206

AC C

EP

TE D

209

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Acknowledgement

211

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest pertaining to this study.

212

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial,

213

or not-for-profit sectors.

RI PT

210

214

SC

215

M AN U

216 217 218

222 223 224 225 226 227

EP

221

AC C

220

TE D

219

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

228

References

229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268

1.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

RI PT

SC

M AN U

5.

TE D

4.

EP

3.

AC C

2.

Swerdllow S, Campo E, Harris NL. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: France: IARC Press, 2008; 2008. Ott G, Katzenberger T, Lohr A, et al. Cytomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic profiles of follicular lymphoma: 2 types of follicular lymphoma grade 3. Blood. 2002;99:3806-3812. Piccaluga PP, Califano A, Klein U, et al. Gene expression analysis provides a potential rationale for revising the histological grading of follicular lymphomas. Haematologica. 2008;93:1033-1038. Horn H, Schmelter C, Leich E, et al. Follicular lymphoma grade 3B is a distinct neoplasm according to cytogenetic and immunohistochemical profiles. Haematologica. 2011;96:1327-1334. Wahlin BE, Yri OE, Kimby E, et al. Clinical significance of the WHO grades of follicular lymphoma in a population-based cohort of 505 patients with long follow-up times. British journal of haematology. 2012;156:225-233. Shustik J, Quinn M, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Skinnider B, Sehn LH. Follicular nonHodgkin lymphoma grades 3A and 3B have a similar outcome and appear incurable with anthracycline-based therapy. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2011;22:1164-1169. Koch K, Hoster E, Ziepert M, et al. Clinical, pathological and genetic features of follicular lymphoma grade 3A: a joint analysis of the German low-grade and high-grade lymphoma study groups GLSG and DSHNHL. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2016;27:1323-1329. Ganti AK, Weisenburger DD, Smith LM, et al. Patients with grade 3 follicular lymphoma have prolonged relapse-free survival following anthracycline-based chemotherapy: the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group Experience. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2006;17:920-927. Hsi ED, Mirza I, Lozanski G, et al. A clinicopathologic evaluation of follicular lymphoma grade 3A versus grade 3B reveals no survival differences. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2004;128:863-868. Swerdlow SH, Cancer IAfRo, Organization WH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2008. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1244. Maeshima AM, Taniguchi H, Nomoto J, et al. Prognostic implications of histologic grade and intensity of Bcl-2 expression in follicular lymphomas undergoing rituximabcontaining therapy. Human pathology. 2013;44:2529-2535. Marcus R, Imrie K, Solal-Celigny P, et al. Phase III study of R-CVP compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone alone in patients with previously

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

16.

17.

RI PT

15.

SC

14.

untreated advanced follicular lymphoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008;26:4579-4586. Hiddemann W, Kneba M, Dreyling M, et al. Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 2005;106:3725-3732. Barta SK, Li H, Hochster HS, et al. Randomized phase 3 study in low-grade lymphoma comparing maintenance anti-CD20 antibody with observation after induction therapy: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1496). Cancer. 2016. Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, et al. Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England). 2013;381:1203-1210. Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl BS, et al. Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood. 2014;123:2944-2952.

M AN U

269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288

292 293 294

EP

291

AC C

290

TE D

289

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Variable

Aggressive FL (n= 21) N (%)

Grade 3A FL (n= 32) N (%)

P value

57 (39-83)

61 (19-85)

0.72

8 (38)

15 (47)

0.58

SC

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of grade 3A and Aggressive Follicular lymphoma

26 (96)

1.0

8 (44)

16 (62)

0.29

8 (44)

8 (30)

2 (11)

1 (4)

0

1 (4)

median (range) Gender Male Race (n=16, 27)

15 (94)

ECOG performance status (n=18, 26) 0 1 2

TE D

3

M AN U

Caucasian

Stage at diagnosis I

RI PT

Age at diagnosis, years

3 (14)

2 (6)

4 (19)

6 (19)

6 (29)

13 (41)

8 (38)

11 (34)

4 (19)

10 (31)

0.36

Low (0-1)

4 (31)

6 (23)

0.82

Intermediate (2)

3 (23)

8 (31)

High (3+)

6 (46)

12 (46)

II

EP

III IV

0.79

B symptoms at diagnosis Yes

AC C

295

FLIPI category (n=13, 26)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

FLIPI2 category (n=7, 12) 1 (14)

2 (16)

Intermediate (1-2)

5 (71)

5 (42)

High (3+)

1 (14)

5 (42)

median (range)

3.5 (1.6-18.0)

Nodal sites at diagnosis (>1 possible)α 8 (38)

Para-aortic

10 (48)

Mediastinal Axillary Mesenteric Inguinal Cervical

Pre-auricular Hilar Spleen

EP

Supraclavicular

0.26

13 (41)

0.78

7 (33)

15 (47)

0.40

4 (19)

15 (47)

0.046

8 (38)

11 (34)

1.0

7 (33)

11 (34)

1.0

6 (29)

9 (28)

1.0

4 (19)

11 (34)

0.35

2 (10)

6 (19)

0.46

3 (14)

3 (9)

0.67

3 (14)

3 (9)

0.67

3 (14)

3 (9)

0.67

4 (19)

8 (25)

0.74

4 (19)

2 (6)

0.20

TE D

Iliac

0.38

18 (56)

M AN U

Retroperitoneal

4.1 (1.3-12.6)

SC

Largest node dimension at diagnosis, cm (n=15, 25)

0.40

RI PT

Low (0)

Extranodal sites at diagnosis (>1 possible)β

AC C

Bone marrow Bone

FL: Follicular lymphoma, ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, FLIPI: Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. α Lymph node sites with ≤ 10% occurrence are not included in table (pectoral, femoral, infraclavicular, Waldeyer’s ring and epitrochlear). β Extranodal sites with ≤ 10% involvement are not included in table (pleura, kidney, liver, colon, lung and skin).

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

296

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2 Therapy and outcomes in grade 3A and aggressive Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Variable

Aggressive FL (n= 21) N (%)

Grade 3A FL (n= 32) N (%)

P value

3 (9)

1.0

2 (10)

Months from diagnosis to first-line treatment median (range)

0.9 (0-117)

First-line treatment included Rituximab (n=19, 29) 18 (95)

24 (83)

M AN U

Yes

0.8 (0-12)

SC

Yes

RI PT

Started with watchful waiting

0.53

1.0

First-line treatment was R-CHOP regimen (n=19, 29) 15 (79)a

21 (72)b

1.0

2 (0-10)

0.47

6 (19)

0.87

27.5 (0.9 - 95)

0.34

4 (19)

5 (16)

0.98

24 (6-29)

32 (25- 37)

0.18

9 (43)

16 (50)

0.29

Yes

Number of lines of treatment (n=19, 29)

Transformation* Yes

2 (0-6)

TE D

median (range)

4 (19)

EP

If transformed, months after diagnosis (n=4, 6) median (range) 15.8 (0-39) Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) Yes

AC C

297

Months from diagnosis to ASCT (n=4, 5) median (range)

Disease progression Yes

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

If progressed, months after diagnosis (n=9, 16) 22 (0-39)

Patient status at follow-up (log-rank) Alive

17 (81)

If alive, months of follow-up after diagnosis (n=17, 26) 62 (14-204)

26 (81)

51 (1-133)

0.55

0.97

0.54

SC

median (range)

19 (1-87)

RI PT

median (range)

298 299 300 301

a

302 303

* Transformation was defined as change of FL 3A or 3B to more aggressive lymphoma at a later stage not present at time of diagnosis.

M AN U

Other first line therapies included: bendamustine – rituximab (1), rituximab (1), rituximab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (1), 1 ABVD for 1 cycle then R-CHOP (1). b Other first line therapies included: bendamustine – rituximab (2), CHOP (1), DHAP-R (1), 4 not known.

AC C

EP

TE D

304

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 3 Univariable prognostic factors for Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival Variable

Overall Survival

Progression-Free Survival

95% CI

P-value

Indolent / Aggressive

1.02

0.29-3.66

0.97

1.13

0.54-2.37

0.75

1.76

1.00-3.10

0.05

0.86

0.69-1.08

0.21

0.73

0.20-2.62

0.63

6.73

1.12-40.5

0.037

0.57

0.16-2.05

0.98

per 10-year increase Gender

ECOG (n=44) 2-3 / 0-1 Stage III-IV / I-II

Yes / No

P-value

0.59-2.56

0.58

2.42

0.69-8.51

0.17

0.39

1.48

0.63-3.50

0.37

0.20-4.71

0.98

0.97

0.39-2.42

0.95

0.90-1.23

0.53

1.24

1.08-1.41

0.002

1.99

0.72-5.47

0.18

TE D

B symptoms

1.23

M AN U

Male / Female

95% CI

SC

Age at diagnosis

HR

RI PT

HR Follicular lymphoma group

Largest node dimension (n=40) per 1 cm increase

High / Int+Low

1.05

EP

FLIPI category (n=39)

5.35

0.62-45.8

0.13

Nodal sites (each expressed as Yes / No) Retroperitoneal

1.40

0.39-5.03

0.60

1.24

0.60-2.57

0.57

Para-aortic

4.19

1.08-16.3

0.039

1.62

0.76-3.46

0.21

Mediastinal

0.13

0.02-1.02

0.052

0.68

0.31-1.48

0.33

Axillary

0.80

0.20-3.12

0.74

1.67

0.79-3.51

0.18

Mesenteric

0.32

0.07-1.54

0.15

0.68

0.30-1.54

0.35

Inguinal

0.16

0.02-1.30

0.09

1.46

0.70-3.07

0.31

Cervical

0.34

0.04-2.74

0.31

1.07

0.47-2.45

0.86

AC C

305

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2.21

0.62-7.89

0.22

2.84

1.27-6.36

0.011

Supraclavicular

0.62

0.08-4.91

0.65

2.43

0.97-6.10

0.06

Pre-auricular

0.82

0.10-6.50

0.85

0.93

0.28-3.11

0.91

0.68

0.20-2.29

0.53

Hilar

[P=0.24; log-rank test]

Spleen

2.23

0.47-10.6

0.31

2.69

1.01-7.17

0.047

0.65

2.43

1.05-5.62

0.038

0.18

0.02-1.33

0.09

Extranodal sites (each expressed as Yes / No) Bone marrow

1.38

[P=0.26; log-rank test]

SC

Bone

0.35-5.41

RI PT

Iliac

306

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

307

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

308

Table 4 Studies investigating outcomes of FL 3 subtypes

Study/ year

Regimen used

Follow up duration

Population size

Wahlin et al 5 /2011

10 years

94:23

Largely anthracycline regimens

5 and 10-Year OS= 71: 43 and 60:43

Shustik et al 6 / 2011

~ 4 years

139:22

Anthracycline regimen in 36%:82%

5-Year OS= 72:71

Maeshima et al 12/ 2013

~ 6 years

47:5

Largely R-CHOP regimen

Koch et al 7/ 2016

~ 7 years

47:14

Current study

~ 5 years

32:21*

FL3A:FL3B

Overall Survival

Study conclusion

FL 3A%: FL3B%

Upfront 17:9

SC

FL3A%: FL3B%

Rituximab used

RI PT

309

FL 3A indolent with similar behavior to FL 1 and 2.

FL 3A and 3B showed no plateau, similar outcomes

6-Year OS= 100:100

Upfront 100:100

FL 3A and 3B had good outcomes in rituximab era, no plateau observed in PFS

R-CHOP induction in 59%:36%

5-Year OS= 84:79

Upfront 59:36

Long-lasting remission in FL 3A is possible

Largely R-CHOP

5-Year OS= 80:90*

Upfront 86:86*

FL 3A showed plateau in PFS and relapse curve after ~ 4 years.

EP

TE D

M AN U

Upfront 26:45

AC C

FL: follicular lymphoma; OS: overall survival, PFS: progression-free survival. * In current study, FL 3B included those with mixed FL3A and 3B as well as FL 3 with areas of DLBCL 310 311 312 313

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

314 315

Figure 1 Progression-free survival of Grade 3A FL and aggressive follicular lymphoma (FL 3B+FL3/DLBCL)

316

FL: follicular lymphoma, DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma

RI PT

317 318 319 320

SC

321 322

324 325

M AN U

323

Figure 2: Overall survival of Grade 3A FL and aggressive follicular lymphoma (FL 3B+FL3/DLBCL)

326

EP

TE D

FL: follicular lymphoma, DLBCL: diffuse large B cell lymphoma

AC C

327

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT