Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
GUANINE-URACIL Sunney I. Chan,
Institute
BASE-PAIRING
Gregory
A. A. Noyes Laboratory
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
C. Y. Lee,
Charles
F. Schmidt
of Chemical
Physics,*
California
California
91109
of Technology,
Pasadena, and
George ICN Nucleic 2727 Campus Received
January
P. Kreishman
Acid Research
Drive,
Irvine,
Institute
California
92664
10, 1972
The interaction of guanosine and 2’-deoxyuridine has been by high resolution pmr spectroscopy in DMSO-water mixtures. is presented for G-U base-pairing in solvent mixtures where the water content is sufficiently high. Downfield shifts were observed for the N(i)-H, NH, protons of G and the N t3)-H proton of U, suggesting that the complex formation involves three hydrogen-bonds and that the G base is pairing in the lactim-amino tautomeric structure. No evidence for G-U base-pairing in the “wobble” as well as other pairing schemes was obtained.
==-Y examine Evidence
The gnanine dominantly showed,
base in nucleic
in the lactam-amino however,
the abnormal
tautomeric
la&m-amino
species
erism.
be quite slow,
resonance
and the kinetics
The rate of interconversion and was dependent
In a recent paper, percentages
in aqueous solution
proton magnetic
both the equilibrium
is known to exist pre-
structure.
that it also exists in appreciable
Using high resolution termined
acid components
(10-X0/,)
at room
(pmr)
of this lactam-lactim
on the temperature
was found to
and pD of the solution.
exchange was shown to give rise to the guanine
broadening
observed
In its normal
lactam-amino
(C) to form the well-known
* Contribution Copyright
in the pmr spectra tautomer,
Watson-Crick
No. 4403.
0 1972, by Academic
Press, Inc.
1536
we detautom-
This slow tautomeric frequently
as
temperature.
spectroscopy,
between the two tautomers
we
of guanine
guanine
Hts)
derivatives.
(G) pairs with cytosine
G-C base-pair29
3 (Fig.
la).
This
’
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
C-G
U-G*
U-G
Fig.
1
G-C pairing of organic
(a) Normal
G-C base-pair.
(c) Wobble
G-U base-pair.
has the appropriate
posing thymine
(T) or uracil
of G is approximately
lactam-lactim
G*-U
pairing
lb).
G*-U
base-pair.
to pair with an op-
Although
in energy
the lactim
than the la&am
This consideration in solution side simply
suggests
1537
base’,
of hydrogen-bonds that it might
be
and to shift the la&am-lactim by flooding
the solution
base-pairing.
was found to be important
8 it is clear that evidence
tautomer
should be comparable
since the same number
here a pmr study of this G*-U
equilibrium
base is hydrated,
structure
or G*-U base-pair
G-C base-pair,
more to the lactim
We report
higher
G*-T
in each case.
to observe
equilibrium
(U) base (Fig.
of the abnormal
is formed
possible
(b) Abnormal
electronic
1 kcal/mole
to that of the normal (three)
Pa~rinq)
has been observed directly by nmr and ir techniques in a number solvents. 4-7 The lactim tautomer of G, henceforth denoted by
G*, however,
the stability
(Wobble
for G*-U
with U.
Since the
only when the guanine pairing
should be sought
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
in aqueous solution. yield
results
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Unfortunately,
which are difficult
such experiments to interpret,
exchange between the water protons the base-pairing, the nucleic
and the protons
acid bases at the nucleoside
for the normal
base-pairing.
G-C base-pairing
have therefore
carried
choice of the water content, can be controlled,
No,-H
of G and the N(,) -H proton
The results
observation
we have summarized N(l)-H,
chemical
resonances
0.2 M dU at various
water concentrations
at this dU/rG
less large
and uracil
that proton resonance guanine base, creases
ratio
which is normally
and significantly,
studied
for the NH, and
between guanosine I and II.
In Table I,
Although
the shifts ob-
interaction
assigned
they are nevertheis occurring
protons
1538
between
shift was observed
to the N(,)-H
the induced shift observed -1.2 to -16.5
Hclt),
0.1 M rG and
are quite small,
downfield
for the
containing
proton
for of the
for this proton
in-
Hz over the range of water
(3 to 40 mole o/o). The increased
served for the NH, and the N(,)-H
sufficiently
of rG and the N(,)-H,
in DMSO.
The largest
with the water content from
concentrations
resonances
of dU for solutions
concentration
bases.
base-pairing
shifts which were observed
enough to infer that some pairing
the guanine
far enough toward
of the G*-U
in Tables
H(lr, and Hu,) proton resonances
NH,,
of
of U in the pmr spectrum.
(dU) are summarized the induced
hydration
But, by appropriate
of the interaction
Ht5) and Ht6) proton
served
to occur.
of individual
of our pmr studies
(rG) and 2’-deoxyuridine
complete
equilibrium
We
in DMSO-water
exchange rates can be rendered
direct
protons
experiments
the thermodynamics
slow to permit
necessary
at low temperatures.
in order to ensure
pairing
of
be that such interactions
except perhaps
G*-U
and the proton
concentrations
It might
the guanine base, and shift its la&m-lactim
the stacking
in
there has been no evidence
out the G-U base-pairing
side for significant
from
or nucleotide
in water.
The water is necessary
the lactim
which may be involved
arising
Moreover,
are quite weak in aqueous solution,
mixtures.
both because of the rapid proton
and because of complications
to detect the abnormal
in pure water (H,O)
induced shifts
ob-
of the guanine base with increasing
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
TABLE
I.
Base-Pairing
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Shiftsa in DMSO-H,O
Mixtures
O.lMrG+0.2MdU
rG Protons
dU Protons
H,O Content Mole %
Htlr,
NH,
H(B) NW-H@(,)-W
3
-2.7
+1.2
-2.1
H(s)
- 1.2
H(1,)
H(e)
-1.6
-1.7
-1.3
+1.4 (6)
-2.5
-2.0
-1.0
-3.5
(5)
19
-2.6
-1.5
-3.0
- 8.5
NC,,-H
(10) 31
-2.5
-4.5
-3.5
(8)
-10.0
-3.4
-2.5
-3.0
-4.0 (16)
-5.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.4 (20)
(20) 40
-2.5
-3.5
-3.5
-16.5 (30)
0.1 M rG + 0.1 M rC
H,O Content Mole %
H(,ft
-2
-2
aChemical
rG Protons NH, H(s)
NW-H
I-h,,)
H(s)
H(c)
NH,
-65.5
-144.0
-2.0
-14.0
-12.0
-59.0
shifts are given in Hz at 220 MHz.
denote linewidths
place (Table II).
DMSO mixture varied
Numbers
(in Hz) of the proton resonance
[dU ] / [rG ] concentration is taking
-14.0
rC Protons
ratio substantiates In these studies,
in parentheses
under consideration.
our contention the water content
that G-U pairing of the H,O-
was held fixed at N 10 mole % and the [dU ] / [rG ] ratio was
by varying
[dU]
at fixed
[rG j . 1539
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
TABLE
BIOCHEMICAL
II.
AND BIOPHYSICAL
G-U Base-Pairing Concentration
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Shiftsa as a Function Ratio in a 10 Mole
of [rG]/
o/c H,O-DMSO
[dU 1 Mixture.
dU Protons Hw )
-(10) 5.0
-11.5
H(s)
H(c)
NW-H -1.5 (10)
+0.5
-1.0
-3.0
-1.5
-3.0
-4.5
0
(25)
a Chemical
(in Hz) of the proton
The downfield
shifts
proton
the formation
of a hydrogen-bonded
H,O/DMSO
mixture
sides when the N(,)-H N(,, -site
shift of the amino
indicates
of G is blocked.
sine and 2’-deoxyuridine implicating
it is not possible
is pairing
with U.
a G-U base-pair proton
we surmise
The kinetics
ton of the lactam
species
group or when the
between these nucleosides,
involving
hydrogen-bonding
that it is the lactim equilibrium
so that the chemical a weighted
and the 0(,)-H
proton
1540
Since
of G with the guanine base in
of the overall
proton of G is in actuality
o/c
with 2-N, N-dimethyl-guano-
no interaction
to fast on the nmr time scale,
the “N(l)-H”
in a 10 mole
of the NH, group of G in the G-U pairing.
to construct
structure,
The
of 1-methyl-guanosine
by a methyl
experiments
also reveal
suggest
between the bases of these nucleo-
of G is replaced
of both the NH, group and the N(,,-H the lactam-amino
protons
of rG
these protons.
to 1-methyl-guanosine
Similar
the involvement
and NH, protons
involving
no interaction
proton
under consideration.
of these two nucleosides
complex
of 2’-deoxyuridine
in parentheses
for the N(,)-H
of dU upon the mixing
absence of a dU induced upon the addition
resonance
observed
and the N(,)-H
mediate
Numbers
shifts are given in Hz at 220 MHz.
denote linewidths
(13)
average
of the lactim
form of G which
is presumably
inter-
shift observed of the N(,rH species
for
proin both
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
the complexed interaction
BIOCHEMICAL
and the free states.
may be compared
of the G-C pairing is only present ture,
AND BIOPHYSICAL
The pairing
to the extent of 10-15s
we expect the base-pairing
magnitude
smaller
assuming
is clearly
of the following
in aqueous solution
and the G*-U
chemical
conditions, stability. in Table I.
semi-quantitatively
KT * = G
(1)
G*-U
(2)
constants
for the lactam-lactim
respectively.
at sufficiently
of dU, so that the observed
of
equilibria:
base-pairing
D [G*-U]
of G
at room tempera-
are of comparable
in Table II can be analyzed
Here KT and K are the equilibrium
[dU],
tautomer
borne out by the data summarized
G* + U Z
we expect
study
shifts in the G-U case to be an order
G
erism
for the G-U
in a parallel
Since the lactim
and G-C base-pairs
The data summarized in terms
I).
observed
than those for the G-C case under similar
that the G*-U
This expectation
shifts
with those observed
in pure DMSO (Table
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
For weak G-U interaction,
high stoichiometric
base-pairing
tautom-
concentrations
shift can be adequately
approximated
by 6 obsd EA where A is the chemical relative
librium
shift of a proton
of G is roughly
i. e., these protons
and G-C pairing, constant
induced
complex
If we can now assume that A for
the same in the G*-U are shifted
for the pairing
complex
as in the G-C
by about the same amount
of magnitude
as that previously
in DMSO.
for the N cl)-H (0(,)-H) 1541
by G*-U
then the data suggest that the equi-
between G* and U is of the order
of the G-C complex
shifts observed
(3)
in the hydrogen-bonded
state.
and KT * 0.05 to 0.1,
which is about the same order the formation
bul,
(1 + KT) + K KT [dU j,
to that in the uncomplexed
the NH, protons complex,
K%
of 1 M-l,
reported
for
Using this K value and the dU proton
of G, we estimate
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
that this proton
BIOCHEMICAL
is shifted
the uncomplexed ppm downfield
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
N 2-3 ppm downfield
state upon G-U pairing. from
from its spectral
Since this proton appears
TMS in the absence of complex
shift is approximately
13.0 ppm downfield
from
formation,
which is what one would expect for the chemical
hydrogen
in a relatively
0-H.
. +0 hydrogen-bond.
We have also noted broadening U upon mixing
ing was found to be more water content, observed
lmebroadening
might
concentrations.
at higher
be due to enhanced
these resonances
we exclude
in the rG-dU
and we suspect that it arises of the overall Finally,
proton
since we observe
of G and U in comparative
equilibria
chemical
our contention
(Fig.
either
of
and reflects
the dy-
by Crick.
equilibrium
This
is not im-
that the la&am-lactim The lack of
in dry DMSO also enables us to
of other base-pairing
lc) proposed
rG or
the broadening
of the guanine base.
of G-U base-pairing
the guanine base is in the la&am-amino pairing
water
of the N-H
induced shifts for any of the G or U resonances.
is induced by the hydration
rule out the importance
of G was also
of dU to rG in dry DMSO does not
would seem to suggest that the lactam-lactim
for any form
At a given
denoted by (1) and (2).
result
evidence
involving
exchange,
in significant
tautomerism
This linebroaden-
must be due to the G*-U base-pairing,
we note that the addition
in DMSO and supports
of G and
This water-dependent
broadening
Thus,
result
portant
resonances
resonance
ratio.
little
this possibility.
from
’
exchange at the higher
experiments
system
its chemical
water contents.
[dU ]/ [rG]
- 10.5
shift of the bridge
I and II).
of the NC,)-H (0(,)-H)
with increasing
However,
dU alone in solution,
namics
(see Tables
pronounced
the broadening
to increase
resonances
of the N-H proton
of the two nucleosides
in
TMS in the hydrogen-bonded
complex,
strong
position
form,
schemes
between G and U when
most notably
the “wobble7’
lo
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by Grant GM 14523-05 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U. S. Public Health Service, and by Grant GP-8540 from the National Science Foundation.
1542
Vol. 46, No. 4, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
References Lee, G. C. Y., and Chan, S. I., J. Amer. Chem. Sot., in press. Watson, J. D., and Crick, F. H., Nature, 1’71 737 (1953). Watson, J. D., and Crick, F. H., Nature, l-7-f 964 (1953). Kyogoku, Y., Lord, R. C., and Rich, A., J%er. Chem. Sot., 89, 496 (1967). Kyogoku, Y., Lord, R. C., and Rich, A., Science, 154 518 (1966). :* and Penman, S., J. Mol. Biol., -15 220 (rss’s). 7: E%?na?k, R. A ., and Cantor, C. R., J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 90- 5010 (1968). Lee, G. C. Y., and Chan, S. I., manuscript in preparation. 9”: Pimentel, G. C. , and McClellan, A. L., “The Hydrogen Bond, ” Freeman, ;;w;o;k (;960). 10. 5 548 (1966). , . . , J. Mol. Biol., ;:
1543