Guidelines of care for phototherapy and photochemotherapy

Guidelines of care for phototherapy and photochemotherapy

ACADEMY GUIDELINES This report reflects the best data available at the time the report was prepared, but caution should be exercised in interpreting t...

675KB Sizes 8 Downloads 116 Views

ACADEMY GUIDELINES This report reflects the best data available at the time the report was prepared, but caution should be exercised in interpreting the data; the results of future studies may require alteration of the conclusions or recommendations set forth in this report.

Guidelines of care for phototherapy and photochernotherapy Committee on Guidelines of Care: Lynn A. Drake, MD, Chairman, Roger I. Ceilley, MD, William Dorner, MD, Robert W. Goltz, MD, Gloria F. Graham, MD, Charles W. Lewis, MD, Stuart J. Salasche, MD, Maria L. Chanco Turner, MD, and Barbara J. Lowery, MPH Task Force on Phototherapy and Photochemotherapy: Warwick Morison, MD, Chairman, Vincent A. DeLeo, MD, John Epstein, MD, Alan Menter, MD, and Robert S. Stern, MD I. Introduction The American Academy of Dermatology's Committee on Guidelines of Care is developing guidelines of care for our profession. The development of guidelines will promote the continued delivery of quality care and assist those outside our profession in understanding the complexities and scope of care provided by dermatologists. For the benefit of members of the American Academy of Dermatology who practice in countries outside the jurisdiction of the United States, thelisted treatments may include agents that are not currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. II. Definition Phototherapy is exposure to nonionizing radiation for therapeutic benefit. It may involve exposure to UVB, INA or various combinations of UYB and UV A radiation. Photochemotherapy (PUVA) is the therapeuticuse ofradiationin combination with a photosensitizing chemical. It currently involves the use ofpsoralens and UVA radia tion, Treatment with these modalities may involve partial or wholebody exposure. III. Rationale A. Scope Phototherapy and psoralen photochemotherapy are administered in inpatient hospitalsettings, hospital clinics, day-care centers, and

Reprint requests: American Academyof Dermatology, P.O.Box 4014, Schaumburg, IL 60168.4014. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1994;31:643-8.

Copyright @ 1994 by the AmericanAcademy of Dermatology, Inc. 0190.9622/94 $3.00 + 0 16/1J57560

doctor'soffices under medical supervision. Certain forms of phototherapy and photochemotherapyare used at home. Diseasesreported to respond to these treatments include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Phototherapy a) Psoriasis b) Eczema c) Photodermatoses d) Pruritus e) Pityriasis rosea j) Lichen planus g) Pityriasis lichenoides h) Acne i) Parapsoriasis j) Pruritic eruptions of HIV infection k) Other 2. Photochemotherapy a) Psoriasis b) Mycosis fungoides c) Vitiligo d) Eczema e) Photodermatoses j) Lichen planus g) Pityriasislichenoides h) Parapsoriasis i) Pruritic eruptions of HIV infection j) Pruritus, other causes k) Alopecia areata I) Other B. Issue The safeand effectiveuse of phototherapy and psoralen photochemotherapy requires the combination of the following: 1.A physician knowledgeable about these modalities

643

644

Drake et al.

2. A trained staff to administer the treatments 3. Informed and reliable patients 4. Equipment that is safe, purpose-built, correctly maintained, and adequately monitored IV. Diagnostic criteria A. Clinical Several steps are involved in determining whe ther phototherapy and/or psoralen photochemotherapy are indicated and appropriate for the patient. 1. Evaluation of the disease a) Severity of disease and/or disability A patient should have a level of disease or disability that warrants use of these treatments. Such disability may be physical, psychologic, or both. b) Site of disease Disease on exposed and relatively hairless skin is most likely to respond to treatment. Certain sites require special consideration, such as the scalp, palm, sales, and genitalia. Disease ofthe palms and soles will favor psoralen photochemotherapy because of diminished penetration of UVB radiation at those sites . c) Type of disease Type of therapy varies with the disease, stage and degree of involvement, and general health. For instance, psoralen photochemotherapy may be especially helpful for treatment of psoriasis when plaques are thick but should be used with caution in the erythrodermic and pus tular phases of the disease. Mild to moderate eczema may respond to phototherapy, but more severe disease to photochemotherapy. d) Alternative therapies There are other treatments for each indication for phototherapy and psoralen photochemotherapy. The risk/benefit ratio of these therapies must be considered . e) Past response to treatment A lack of response to phototherapy may be an indication for a trial of photochemotherapy and vice versa. /} Other 2. Evaluation of the patient a) History 1) General medical status 2) Age Patients of any age may be treated

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology October 1994

with phototherapy and photochemotherapy. However, in children, photochemotherapy should only be used in special circumstances. 3) Sex Phototherapy and photochemotherapy may be used in male and female patients. Photochemotherapy is contraindicated during breast-feeding and relatively contraindicated during pregnancy. 4) Compliance Photochemotherapy is a complicated treatment and should only be used in patients who are able to comprehend and comply with all instructions. 5) Medications Use of photosensitizing drugs should be recorded. Patients taking such medication require careful monitoring for phototoxic events. 6) History ofphotosensitivity and connective tissue disease 7) Skin type 8) Pregnancy 9) History of skin cancer 10) Prior history of exposure to ionizing rad iation 11) Other b) Physical examination I) General physical examination as a ppropriate 2) Examination of the skin The area to be treated should be examined to assess extent of disease, detect existing skin cancer, assess nevi, evaluate any photoaging, and detect other signs of cutaneous disease. 3) Ophthalmologic consultation Required at the start of treatment with psoralen photochemotherapy and should be repeated yearly, or more often if there are abnormal findings B. Diagnostic tests 1. Biopsy and histologic examination of the skin may be indicated to establish the diagnosis. 2. Serum antinuclear antibody Advisable if there is suggestion of associated connective tissue disease by history or clinical examination. A positive result

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Volume 31, Number 4

should be investigated by further serologic testing to eliminate the possibility of clinicalor subclinical lupus erythematosus. 3. Tests of liver and renal function Before initiation of photochemotherapy if significant impairment of the function of these organs is suggested. from the history and physical examination. 4. Other C. Inappropriate diagnostic tests Not applicable D. Exceptions Not applicable E. Evolving diagnostic tests Not applicable V. Recommendations A. Treatment 1. Medical a) Treatments 1) UV phototherapy: exposureto UVB and/or UVA radiation using suberythemogenic or erythemogenic doses The initial doses of radiation are determined by skin typing or phototesting to determine erythemal responses. Before using an erythemogenic protocol, the patient must be cautioned thatthe development of erythema is an integral component of the treatment. 2) Psoralen photochemotherapy: exposure to UVA radiation after medication with methoxsalen or trioxsalen given orally, topically, or in a bath. The doses of UVA radiation are intended to be suberythemogenic, but erythema is an inevitable consequence in a proportion of patients because of wide variation in individual absorption of methoxsalen. Patients should be warned of this risk. 3) Combination therapies: phototherapy and photochemotherapy may be used in combination with topical agents, such as tar, anthralin and corticosteroids, and systemic agents, such as retinoids and methotrexate. 4) Other b) Equipment 1) An appropriately designed UVA and/or UVB treatment unit should be used. The equipment must have been established in clinical trials to

Drake et al. 645 be safe and effective for the therapy being given. 2) A total body treatment unit should include safety features such as the following: (a) Proper electrical grounding (b) An accurate timing or dosimetry device (c) Protective shielding of lamps (d) Handrails, handholds, or other support (e) Viewing window or mirror (j) Doors that can be opened by the patient (g) Nonskid floor (h) Adequate cooling of the chamber (i) Other 3) The irradiance of the UVA equipment should be monitored by a photometer or radiometer. c) Patient education 1) Provide an explanation of the nature of treatment, potential benefits, short-, and long-term risks and the precautions that are necessary. This explanation may be reinforced. by a handout, video, or other educational material. 2) Provide periodic communication with patients verbally, or via a newsletter or handout emphasizing precautions that patients should take during treatments, ways to monitor for adverse effects such as possible skin cancer, and the need to bring such lesions to the attention of the physician. d) Precautions 1) During treatment (a) The eyes should be protected by wearing UV-blocking goggles. An occasional exception may be made in patients with recalcitrant disease of the eyelids or periorbital skin, and at the physician's discretion. (b) The face, genitalia, and radiation-damaged skin should be shielded unless involved with significant disease. 2) Before and after treatment with photochemotherapy (a) Patients must wear UVA-blocking glasses,whenever using sun-

646 Drake et al. light for illumination, from the time of exposure to psoralen until sunset that day. In addition, patients should be encouraged to wear U'V-blocking glasses when exposed to sunlight on the following day. (b) Patients should avoid unnecessary exposure to sunlight on days they receive treatment and should be discouraged from deliberate exposure to sunlight on nontreatment days. (c) Patients should be encouraged to use sunscreen on exposed areas. e) Monitoring of patients 1) During treatment Trained personnel must be present throughout the treatment and be in a position to communicate with the patient (except for home therapy; see Section V.A.l.h.) 2) During a course of therapy Regular evaluation of patients by the physician is essential to assess response to therapy and the development of adverse effects. A prime aim of these evaluations is to keep the exposure dose of radiation to a minimum compatible with adequate control of disease. 3) Periodic follow-up may be indicated for skin cancer screening. j) Factors influencing choice of treatment 1) Absolute contraindications (a) Xeroderma pigrnentosum (b) Other disorders with significant light sensitivity (e.g., albinism) (c) Other 2) Contraindications (a) Lupus erythematosus (b) Breast-feeding Contraindicated for photochemotherapy but phototherapy may be used. (c) Other 3) Treatment may be used with caution in the following circumstances: (a) History or family history of melanoma (b) Past history of nonmelanoma skin cancer, extensivesolar damage, and previous treatment with ionizing radiation or arsenic

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology October 1994 (c) Pemphigus and pemphigoid (d) Immunosuppression (e) Uremia and hepatic failure May be contraindicated for photochemotherapy because of disturbed drug metabolism. (j) Severe myocardial disease or other infirmity likely to make stand ing for a prolonged period in the treatment unit hazardous or difficult (g) Cataracts and aphakia Careful attention to eye protection is required if such patients are treated with psoralen photochemotherapy. (h) Pregnancy Usually contraindicated for photochemotherapy but phototherapy may be used (i) Photosensitivity, with or without photosensitizing drugs (j) Other g) Records A record should be kept documenting each patient's treatment, including exposure dose/time and area treated. h) Home therapy Therapeutic use of UV radiation outside a physician's officeor clinic should be restricted mainly to patients who have difficultyin attending on-site therapy. It requires special consideration of the ability of the physician to adequately monitor the treatment. The patient should be judged to be intelligent, motivated , and reliable so that he or she is likely to use the treatment correctly , keep records of exposure, and attend for regular evaluations. The treatments are as follows: 1) UV phototherapy using devices emitting predominantly UVB radiation for the treatment of psoriasis 2) Phototherapy with UV or visible radiation for the treatment of solar urticaria 3) Photochemotherapy with trioxsalen and sunlight in the treatment of vitiligo and photodermatoses. More photoactive psoralens such as methoxsalen should not be used except with extreme caution. Exposure to UV light in tanning booths or na-

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Volume 31, Number 4

tural sunlight can result in severe burns. 4) Other i) Other 1) Anticipated side effects of phototherapy (a) Erythema, blistering, and pruritus (b) Photoaging of skin (e) Skin cancer (d) Other 2) Anticipated side effects of photochemotherapy (a) Gastrointestinal and neurologic disturbances with oral methoxsalen (b) Erythema, blistering, and pruritus (e) Photoaging of skin (d) Skin cancer (e) Other 3) Idiosyncratic side effects of phototherapy (a) Photosensitivity (b) Herpes simplex (e) Other 4) Idiosyncratic side effects of photochemotherapy (a) Photosensitivity (b) Herpes simplex (c) Toxic reactions including bronchoconstriction, hepatitis, and exanthem (d) Ankle edema (e) Other 2. Surgical Not applicable B. Miscellaneous Not applicable VI. Supporting evidence See Bibliography (Appendix) VII. Disclaimer Adherence to these guidelines will not ensure successful treatment in every situation. Further, these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusiveof other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. For the benefit of members of the American Academy of Dermatology who practice in countries outside the juris-

Drake et al. 647 diction of the United States, the listed treatments may include agents that are not currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Appendix. Bibliography Abel EA, ed. Photochemotherapy in dermatology.New York: Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers, 1992. Anderson TF, WaldingerTP, Voorhees 11. UVB phototherapy: an overview. Arch Dermatol 1984;120:1502-7. Bickers DR. Position paper-PUVA therapy. 1 AM ACAD DERMATOL 1983;8:265-70. Bickfore ED, BergerDS, Corth R, et aI. Risks associated with use of UV A irradiatorsbeing used in treating psoriasis and other conditions. PhotochemPhotobiol 1979;30:199-202. Buchness MR, Lim HW, Hatcher VA, et aI. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: treatment with ultraviolet B phototherapy. N Eng! J Moo 1988;318:1183-6. Carabott FM, Hawk lL. A modified dosage schedule for increased efficiency inPUVA treatmentof psoriasis. Coo Exp Dermato11989; 14:337-40. Chue B, Borok M, Lowe Nl. Phototherapy units: comparison of fluorescent ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A units with a high-pressure mercury system. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1988;18:641-5. Cram DL, Winkelmann RK. Ultraviolet-induced acantholysis in pemphigus. Arch Dermatol 1965;92:7-13. Currentstatus oforal PUVA therapyfor psoriasis. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1979;1:106-17. Current status of oral PUVA therapyfor psoriasis: eye protection revisions. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1982;6:851-5. Diffey BL, Roe1andts R. Status of ultraviolet A dosimetry in methoxsalen plus ultraviolet A therapy. 1 AM ACAD DERMATOL 1986;15:1209-13. Epstein JH, Tuffanelli DL, Dubois E. Light sensitivityand lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol 1965;91 :483-5. Fanselow D, Crone M, Dahl MV. Dosimetry in phototherapy cabinets. JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1987;17:74-7. Gilchrest BA, Parrish lA, Tanenbaum L, et aI. Oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy of mycosis fungoides. Cancer 1976;38:683-9. Gilchrest BA, Rowe JW, Brown RS, et al. Relief of uremic pruritus with ultraviolet phototherapy. N Engl J Moo 1977;297:136-8. Gschnait F, Honigsmann H, BrennerW, et al. InductionofUV lighttolerancebyPUV A in patientswithpolymorphous light eruption. Br J DerrnatoI1978;99:293-5. Harber LC, Bickers DR. Photosensitivity diseases: principleof diagnosis and treatment. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1989. Harber LC, Bickers DR, EpsteinJH, et aI. Report on ultravioletlight sources: report by the task forceon photobiology of the national program for dermatology. Arch Dermato1 1974;109:833-9. Jekler J, Larko O. DVB phototherapy of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1988;119:697-705. Jordan WP Jr, ClarkeAM, HaleRK. Long-term modified Goeckerman regimen for psoriasis using an ultraviolet Blight source in the home. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1981;4:584-91. LehmannP, HOlzle E, KindP, et aI.Experimentalreproduction ofskinlesions inlupus erythematosus byUVA and UVB radiation. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1990;22:181-7. LoweNJ, Urbach F, BaiIinP,eta!. Comparativeefficacy oftwo

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology October 1994

Drake et al. dosage forms of oral methoxsalen in psoralens plus ultraviolet A therapy of psoriasis. J AM ACAD DERMATOL 1987; 16:994-8. Morison WL. Phototherapy and photochemotherapy of skin disease. New York: Raven Press, 1991. Morison WL, Momtaz K, Mosher DB, et al. UVB phototherapy in the prophylaxis of polymorphous light eruption. Br J DermatoI1982;106:231-3. Morison WL, Parrish J, Fitzpatrick TB. Oral psoralen photochemotherapy of atopic eczema. Br 1 Dermatol 1978;98:2530. N yfors A, Dahl-N yfors B, Hopwood D. Liver biopsies from patients with psoriasis related to photochemotherapy (PUVA): findings before and after 1 year of therapy in twelve patients. lAM ACAD DERMATOL 1986;14:43-8. Ortonne JP, Mosher DB, Fitzpatrick TB. Vitiligo and other hypomelanoses of hair and skin. New York: Plenum Medical, 1983:260-86. Parrish lA, Chylack LT, Woehler ME, et al. Dermatological and ocular examinations in rabbits chronically photosensitized with methoxsalen. J Invest Dermatol 1979;73: 250-5. Parrish lA, Fitzpatrick TB, Tanenbaum L, et al. Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and longwave ultraviolet light. N Engl 1 Med 1974;291 :1207-1l. Picascia DD, Rothe M, Goldberg NS, et al. Antinuclear antibodies during psoralens plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) thera-

py-Are they worthwhile? JAM ACADDERMATOL 1987; 16:574-7. Prystowsky Jl-l, Keen MS, DeLeo VA. Measurement of the transmittance of ultraviolet and visibleradiation through human eyelids. Photochem Photobiol 1990;51:38. Ramsay CA. Solar urticaria treatment by inducing tolerance to artificial radiation and natural light. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:1222-5. Ros AM. PUVA therapy for erythropoietic protoporphyria. Photodermatology 1988;5:148-9. Saltzer EI. Relief from uremic pruritus: a therapeutic approach. Cutis 1975;16:298-9. Stern RS, Kleinerman RA, Parrish lA, et al. Phototoxic reactions to photoactive drugs in patients treated with PUVA. Arch Dermatol 1980;116:1269-71. Stern RS, Morison WL, Thibodeau LA, et al. Antinuclear antibodies and oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy (PUVA) for psoriasis. Arch DermatoI1979;115:1320-4. Stern RS, Parrish lA, Fitzpatrick TB. Ocular findings in patients treated withPUVA. J Invest Derrnatol 1985;85:26973. Tuffanelli DL. Antinuclear antibodies and photosensitivity in lupus erythematosus-Relevant in PUVA therapy? [Editorial] JAM ACAD DERMATOL 1987;16:614-6. Zachariae H, Kragballe K, Sogaard H. Liver biopsy in PUVAtreated patients. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1979;59:26870.

This report reflects the best data available at the time the report was prepared, but caution should be exercised in interpreting the data; the results of future studies may require alteration of the conclusions or recommendations set forth in this report.

Guidelines of care for cryosurgery Committee on Guidelines of Care: Lynn A. Drake, MD, Chairman, Roger I. Ceilley, MD, Raymond L. Cornelison, MD, William L. Dobes, MD, William Dorner, MD, Robert W. Goltz, MD, Charles W. Lewis, MD, Stuart 1. Salasche, MD, Maria L. Chanco Turner, MD, and Barbara J. Lowery, MPH Task Force on Cryosurgery: Gloria F. Graham, MD, Chairman, Richard L. DetIefs, MD, Algin B. Garrett, MD, Emanuel G. Kuflik, MD, and Ronald R. Lubritz, MD I. Introduction The American Academy of Dermatology's Committee on Guidelines of Care is developing guidelines of care for our profession. The development of guidelines will promote the continued delivery of quality care and assist those outside our profession Reprint requests: American Academy of Dermatology, P.O. Box4014, Schaumburg, IL 60168·4014. JAM ACAD DERMAToL 1994;31:648-53. Copyright © 1994 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. 0190-9622/94 $3.00

648

+ 0 16/1/57562

in understanding the complexities and scope of care provided by dermatologists. For the benefit of members of the American Academy of Dermatology who practice in countries outside the jurisdiction of the United States, the listed treatments may include agents that are not currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

II. Definition Cryosurgery is a procedure utilizing cryogenic agents to treat a variety of cutaneous diseases. Freezing temperatures of a cryogenic agent applied directly or indirectly to the skin cause local destruc-