Hard X –Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES) characterisation of electrochemical passivation oxide layers on Al-Cr-Fe Complex Metallic Alloys (CMA) Alessandra Beni, No´emie Ott, Magdalena Pawelkiewicz, Micheline Ward´e, Kirsty Young, Birgitta Bauer, Parasmani Rajput, Blanka Detlefs, J¨org Zegenhagen, Ronan McGrath, Marie-Genevi`eve Barth´es-Labrousse, Lars P.H. Jeurgens, Patrik Schmutz PII: DOI: Reference:
S1388-2481(14)00156-8 doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.05.024 ELECOM 5169
To appear in:
Electrochemistry Communications
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
12 May 2014 16 May 2014 20 May 2014
Please cite this article as: Alessandra Beni, No´emie Ott, Magdalena Pawelkiewicz, Micheline Ward´e, Kirsty Young, Birgitta Bauer, Parasmani Rajput, Blanka Detlefs, J¨ org Zegenhagen, Ronan McGrath, Marie-Genevi`eve Barth´es-Labrousse, Lars P.H. Jeurgens, Patrik Schmutz, Hard X –Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES) characterisation of electrochemical passivation oxide layers on Al-Cr-Fe Complex Metallic Alloys (CMA), Electrochemistry Communications (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.05.024
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Hard X –Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES) characterisation of electrochemical passivation oxide layers on Al-Cr-Fe Complex Metallic Alloys
RI
PT
(CMA)
SC
Alessandra Beni1*, Noémie Ott1, Magdalena Pawelkiewicz1, Micheline Wardé2, Kirsty Young3,
NU
Birgitta Bauer4, Parasmani Rajput5, Blanka Detlefs5, Jörg Zegenhagen5, Ronan McGrath3, Marie-
1
MA
Geneviève Barthés- Labrousse2, Lars P. H. Jeurgens1, Patrik Schmutz1
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science & Technology, Ueberlandstrasse 129,
8600, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
ICMMO, CNRS UMR 8182 Université Paris Sud, 91404, Orsay Cedex, France.
3
Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom.
4
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig Maximilians University,
TE
D
2
5
AC CE P
Theresienstrasse 41, 80333 Munich, Germany. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ESRF, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38043 Grenoble Cedex,
France.
*Corresponding author
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (A. Beni),
[email protected] (P. Schmutz) Telephone: +41 (0)58 765 4845.
Abstract
A Hard X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES) characterisation of the passivation layers formed by electrochemical polarisation of Al-Cr-Fe complex metallic alloys is presented. By employing X-ray excitation energies from 2.3 to 10.0 keV, the depth distributions of Al- and Cr1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT oxide and hydroxide species in the (Al,Cr)-passive layers could be determined. Simultaneous analyses of the shallow Al 2s and deep Al 1s core level lines (respectively, more bulk- and
PT
surface-sensitive) provided complementary information to effectively determine the depth-
RI
resolved contributions of hydroxide and oxide species within the passivation layer. A Cr
NU
SC
threshold concentration of 18 (at %) was found for effective passivation at pH 1.
MA
Keywords
Electrochemical passivation, Hard X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (HAXPES), Al alloys,
AC CE P
TE
D
Complex Metallic Alloys, composition depth profiling, oxide/hydroxide.
1. Introduction
Al-Cr-Fe complex metallic alloys (CMA) are intermetallic phases occurring as crystalline approximants of quasicrystals [1, 2] and present peculiar bulk [3] and surface properties, such as low friction, hydrophobicity and high corrosion resistance in the 0-14 pH range [4, 5], being good candidates as multifunctional corrosion protecting coatings. Their corrosion resistance in very aggressive environments, such as acidic sulphuric or chloride containing electrolytes, has been proven by electrochemical techniques [4, 5]. The formation of a 6-8 nm thin protective passive layer composed of several Al and Cr oxyhydroxide stacks was evidenced by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) [4, 6] and complementary XPS and Auger sputtering depth profile analyses, which are typically used to determine the depth-resolved chemical constitution of layers with a 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT thickness exceeding the XPS information depth. However, the main disadvantages of the latter techniques are the possible preferential sputtering effects and the need for an accurate calibration
PT
of the sputtering rate [7]. Investigation of the oxidation mechanism not only requires detailed
RI
information on the oxide constitution, but also on the oxidation-induced changes in the alloy adjacent to the alloy/oxide interface [8]. Unfortunately, the information depth obtained by angle-
SC
resolved XPS analysis using a conventional Al- or Mg- X-ray source is limited up to about 6 nm
NU
and therefore cannot probe the alloy/oxide interface for ‘thicker’ passive oxide layers, as formed by e.g. electrochemical polarisation [10]. Furthermore, the energy resolution of standard
MA
laboratory set-ups is typically insufficient to unequivocally resolve the oxide and hydroxide components in measured core-level spectra of oxidised alloys [9].
D
The present study demonstrates that Hard X-ray XPS (HAXPES) is a very powerful
TE
technique to characterise relatively thick, multi-element oxyhydroxide layers on Al-Cr-Fe CMAs
AC CE P
as formed by potentiostatic anodic polarisation. By tuning the energy of the incident X-rays up to 10 keV [10, 11], HAXPES can effectively probe the chemical constitution as a function of depth over the entire passive layer and across the reacting alloy/oxide interface. In addition, the use of a synchrotron source with monochromatised X-ray optics provides an enhanced energy resolution as compared to conventional set-ups, thus allowing simultaneous analysis of shallow and deep core-level photoelectron lines (like Al 2s and Al 1s), thereby opening the field to new physics. As demonstrated in this work, use of high-energy resolution at various excitation energies is essential for identifying the chemical environments in the multi-element oxyhydroxide layers formed by electrochemical treatments for which a direct comparison with known reference oxide and/or hydroxide bulk compounds is not possible.
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2. Experimental Details 2.1 Materials and electrochemical treatment
PT
Four Al-based CMA intermetallics; the orthorhombic Al78.8Cr15.5Fe5.7 and Al79.1Cr17.8Fe3.1, the
RI
hexagonal Al78.7Cr20.6Fe0.7 and the cubic Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 (at %) phases were investigated.
SC
Corresponding single crystals were prepared at LMU (Munich) [12]. The polycrystalline cubic phase was prepared at LSGMM (Nancy).
NU
All the samples were polished to mirror finish using diamond paste and ethanol and
MA
electrochemical anodically potentiostatic polarised in the low passive domain at 0VSCE for 24 h in
2.2 HAXPES measurements
TE
D
sulphuric acid electrolytes at pH 0 or 1, using a conventional three electrode cell.
AC CE P
The measurements were conducted at the ID32 beamline of the ESRF. The excitation energy was varied from 2.3 to 10.0 keV. A double-crystal Si(111) monochromator and a PHOIBOS 225 HV hemispherical electron analyser [13] were used to record HAXPES spectra at various photoelectron take-off angles. High-resolution measurements were performed using additional Si(333) and Si(555) post-monochromators. The binding energy (BE) was calibrated using gold. CasaXPS (2009 Casa Software Ltd) was used for data analysis, applying a Shirley-type background and asymmetric lineshapes for the metallic peaks and symmetric Gaussian/Lorentzian lineshapes for the oxidic ones (See the Appendix for the details). The lineshapes of the metallic peak components were determined from the spectra of clean alloys. Due to the variation of the energy resolution with the excitation energy (different source/analyser resolution, use of post-monochromators), the lineshape parameters can be different for different excitation energies. 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.
Results and Discussion
Fig. 1 displays exemplary Al 2s, Al 1s and Cr 2p3/2 spectra recorded at 6.0 and 10.0 keV for the
PT
Al78.7Cr20.6Fe0.7 alloy after two different surface treatments, but identical electrochemical potentiostatic polarisations in sulphuric acid at pH 1: see caption for details. For all specimens
RI
studied, no oxidised state of Fe could be detected in the Fe 2p3/2 core-level spectra, indicating that
SC
Fe does not contribute to the formation of the passivation layer.
NU
At least two oxidic components were identified in the Al 2s spectra positioned at shifts of +1.7 and +2.7 (± 0.1) eV with respect to the metallic peak, as attributed to Al-oxide-like and Al-
MA
hydroxide-like environments, respectively. Such components were also identified in the Al 1s spectra at relative chemical shifts of +1.6 and +2.5 (± 0.1) eV. Figs. 1a,b shows that the Al 1s
D
core-level, as positioned at much higher BE, provides an enhanced surface sensitivity as
TE
compared to the Al 2s core level. Due to the enhanced degree of hydroxylation near the surface,
AC CE P
the Al 1s spectra thus show a more pronounced contribution of the Al-hydroxide component. The Cr 2p3/2 oxidic spectra (Fig. 1c,d) can also be described by at least one oxide-like and one hydroxide-like component with a respective chemical shift of +2.5 and +3.6 (± 0.1) eV, in accordance with Ref. [14].
In summary, the HAXPES analysis evidences different local environments (i.e. oxide and hydroxide) for the Al and Cr cations in the defective oxyhydroxide layers formed on the Al-Cr-Fe complex metallic alloys after electrochemical treatment in sulphuric acid. The high degree of local disorder of the oxyhydroxide layers modifying the local coordination spheres around Al and Cr cations in the oxide- and hydroxide-like environments (e.g. bond lengths and angles, as well as ligand-type) , results in relative large intrinsic widths and chemical shifts of the fitted oxide and hydroxide components.
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
80 60 40
20
20
0 124
120
118
116
114
Al 1s 6 keV
0 124
1000
NU
600 400
x10
3
122
RI
40
CPS
CPS
60
Al 2s 10 keV
PT
b)
Al 2s 80 6 keV
SC
a)
122
120
118
116
114
Al 1s 10 keV
500
MA
200 0
0 1566 1564 1562 1560 1558 1556
1566 1564 1562 1560 1558 1556
CPS
200
100
0
AC CE P
Cr 2p3/2 6 keV
580
578
576
574
Binding energy (eV)
Binding energy (eV)
d)
Cr 2p3/2 10 keV 30
CPS
c)
TE
D
Binding energy (eV)
20 10 0
572
580
578
576
574
572
Binding energy (eV)
Fig. 1. Reconstructed high-resolution Al 2s, Al 1s and Cr 2p3/2 spectra for the Al78.7Cr20.6Fe0.7 alloy after metallographic polishing without (a,c) and with (b,d) sputter/annealing and subsequent electrochemical polarisation in sulphuric acid (pH 1) for 24 hours at 0VSCE, as recorded at 6 and 10 keV, respectively.
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT b)
122
120
118
116
0 582
114
Binding energy (eV)
3
5
0
580
578
e)
Cr 2p3/2 3.8 keV 1000
200
500
0 116
580
578
576
574
50 60 70 take off angle (deg)
530
528
O 1s 3.8 keV
1000
536
CrOx/Al2sOx (2.3 keV) CrOx/Al1sOx (2.3 keV)
Ratio
40
AC CE P
0.6
30
2000
i)
2.0
532
0
h)
D
(2.3 keV) (10.0 keV) (2.3 keV) (10.0 keV)
534
Binding energy (eV)
572
1.5
0.2
536
Binding energy (eV)
0.8
0.4
f
IOx/IMet
1.0
582
114
Binding energy (eV)
CrOx/Al1sOx CrOx/Al1sOx CrOx/Al2sOx CrOx/Al2sOx
1.2
Ratio
118
TE
g)
120
MA
100 0
572
NU
CPS
CPS
300
122
574
Binding energy (eV)
Al 2s 3.8 keV
124
576
SC
124
O 1s 2.3 keV
10
RI
0
400
x10
4000
2000
1000
d)
15
CPS
2000
CPS
CPS
CPS
CPS
3000
c)
Cr 2p3/2 2.3 keV
6000
PT
Al 2s 2.3 keV
CPS
a)
40
534
532
530
Binding energy (eV)
528
Al 1s 2.3 keV Al 2s 2.3 keV Al 1s 6.0 keV Al 2s 6.0 keV Al 1s 10.0 keV Al 2s 10.0 keV
35
6 4
1.0
2 0.5
0 10
20
30 40 50 60 70 take off angle (deg)
18
20 27 Cr content (at%)
Fig. 2. a)-f) Reconstructed Al 2s, Cr 2p3/2 and O 1s spectra for the electrochemically polarised Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 alloy in sulphuric acid (pH 0) after 24 hours at 0VSCE , as recorded at 45º take-off angle. g-i ) Corresponding intensity ratios at different excitation energies and electron take-off angles for the alloys after polarisation in sulphuric acid for 24 hours at 0VSCE: g) Cr20% alloy (pH 1), h) Cr27% alloy (pH 0) and i) Al intensity ratios as a function of the alloy Cr content (pH 1). The estimated error can amount to ±10%.
Evaluation of the HAXPES spectra as a function of the excitation energy allowed a nondestructive, depth-resolved determination of the chemical constitution of the passivation layers. 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The Al 2s and Cr 2p3/2 spectra (Fig. 2, a-f) recorded at 2.3 keV and 3.8 keV for the Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 alloy confirm the incorporation of both Al and Cr in the grown oxyhydroxide
PT
passivation layers with an enhanced degree of hydroxylation towards the outer surface. For low
RI
excitation energies (i.e. more surface-sensitive), an additional minor component appears in the Al 2s and Cr 2p spectra, which is attributed to the residues of sulphate species from the electrolyte
SC
solution interacting with the passive layer outer surface. The O 1s core-level could be described
NU
by three components at 534.5 eV, 532.7 and 531.5 eV, as attributed to Al-hydroxide-like, overlapping Al-oxide/Cr-hydroxide-like and Cr-oxide-like local chemical environments,
MA
respectively [15]. Unfortunately, due to the large intrinsic width of the O 1s line, an increased energy resolution could not resolve the individual oxide and hydroxide components in the O 1s
D
envelope in presence of so different Al and Cr cations.
TE
Passivation of the Al-Cr-Fe alloys is ensured by the formation of the (Al,Cr)-
AC CE P
oxyhydroxide layer, as outlined above. The Croxide/Aloxide intensity ratios (summing the oxide and hydroxide components) evidence that the oxyhydroxide layers are richer in Cr cations towards their outer surface (Fig. 2g,h). The average thicknesses of the passivation layers for the electrochemically treated Al-Cr-Fe phases can then be estimated by assuming a simplified bilayer structure [16], consisting of an Al-oxide bottom layer and a Cr-oxide top layer on the alloy substrate. Table 1 reports thickness estimations using the intensity attenuations (using atomic densities of 51, 47 and 41 at/nm3 for the alloy, Al2O3 and Cr2O3, respectively [9]) of the HAXPES Cr 2p3/2 and Al 2s signals recorded at 6 keV where the metallic and oxidic compounds are well defined. As shown in Fig. 2i), the lower the Cr content, the thicker the oxyhydroxide layer and hence the higher the ionic mobility (i.e. the poorer the corrosion resistance). The Cr 17.8 and 20.6 at% phases present similar oxide thicknesses, confirming that the Cr threshold for the formation of a barrier-type passivation layer in sulphuric acid (pH 1) is correlating with a 8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT minimum Cr content > 18 at% in the alloy, in accordance with previously published
Al oxide
(at%)
calculated
calculated
thickness (Å)
thickness (Å)
Al78.8Cr15.5Fe5.7
21
110
Al79.1Cr17.8Fe3.1
10
44
56
MA
30
D
9
AC CE P
Calculated IMFP (Å) in Al2O3
2.3 keV
78
TE
Al78.7Cr20.6Fe0.7
Angle (deg)
SC
Cr oxide
NU
Composition
RI
PT
electrochemical potentiostatic current transient measurements [5].
10 keV
Al 1s
9.7
Al 1s
69.0
Al 2s
22.5
Al 2s
79.0
Cr 2p 18.6
Cr 2p 75.8
Al 1s
18.9
Al 1s 134.0
Al 2s
43.6
Al 2s 153.2
Cr 2p 36.1
Cr 2p 147.1
Table 1. Oxide thickness estimation using equations in [16] and IMFP in Al2O3 at various excitation energies and angles according to [17].
4.
Conclusions
HAXPES was used to perform a non-destructive depth profile analysis of the passivation layers formed by electrochemical polarisation of Al-Cr-Fe complex metallic alloys in very acidic electrolytes (sulphuric acid pH 1 or 0). Using Hard X-rays, deep core-level photoelectron lines which cannot be excited with conventional laboratory sources were collected (i.e. Al 1s). The 9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT shallow and deep core levels provided complementary information: i.e. the Al 1s signal allowed an enhanced surface sensitivity. Analysis and cross correlation of Al 1s, Al 2s, Cr 2p and O 1s
PT
spectra recorded at progressively increasing X-Ray excitation energies (from 2.3 to 3.8 keV) and
RI
enhanced energy resolution revealed the distributions of Al and Cr cations in hydroxide-like and oxide-like local chemical environments as a function of depth below the surface and indicate a
SC
relative enrichment of Cr cations towards the outer passive layer surface.
NU
Higher excitation energies (6-10 keV) were utilised to probe the interface (i.e. to record a reliable signal from the alloy substrate), thus allowing an estimation of the thickness of the passivation
MA
layers. As a final result, a Cr threshold of 18 at % was identified, necessary for the formation of a
AC CE P
TE
D
thin protecting barrier type passive oxyhydroxide layer on the Al-Cr-Fe complex metallic alloys.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Appendix Designation
BE
FWHM
(± 0.1 eV)
(± 0.1 eV)
84.0
0.6
Al 2s
Metal
118.1
1.1
Al 2s
Al oxide
119.8
1.6
Al 2s
Al hydroxide
120.8
1.6
Al 2s
Al sulphate
122.4
Al 1s
Metal
1559.8
Al 1s
Oxide
1561.4
Al 1s
Hydroxide
1562.4 1564.5
Cr 2p3/2
Cr2O3
Cr 2p3/2
Cr(OH)3
Cr 2p3/2
A(0.001,1,10)SGL(80) SGL(30)
SGL(30)
1.5
SGL(100)
1.1
SGL(50)
1.7
SGL(30)
1.7
SGL(30)
SC
Metal
1.8
SGL(50)
574.0
1.2
A(0.4,0.5,0)*SGL(20)
576.5
2.6
SGL(30)
577.6
2.6
GL(30)
CrO3 or Cr sulphate
579.5
2.0
SGL(30)
Fe 2p3/2
metal
706.9
0.6
A(0.5,1,10)SGL(40)
O 1s
Cr oxide
531.5
1.5
GL(30)
NU
Al sulphate
MA
Al 1s Cr 2p3/2
A(0.1,0,400)SGL(100)
RI
Metal
Au4f7/2
Lineshape CasaXPS
PT
Core Level
hydroxide
532.7
2.2
SGL(20)
O 1s
TE
D
Al oxide and Cr O 1s
534.5
1.5
SGL(30)
(overlapping)
AC CE P
Al hydroxide
Table A1: Chemical assignment of the fitted components in the passivation layers on the Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1
alloy after electrochemical treatment in sulphuric acid at pH0 (excitation energy 2.3 keV, no postmonochromators used).
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acknowledgements
PT
The work was developed within the framework of the European integrated Centre for the
RI
Development of new Metallic Alloys and Compounds ‘C-MAC’ (http://www.eucmac.eu). The authors are grateful to Prof Gille (LMU Munich) and M. de Weerd (LSGMM Nancy) for
SC
sample preparation and thank Dr Maehl and Dr Thiessen (SPECS GmbH) for providing the
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
simulated relative transmission factors of the PHOIBOS 225 analyser.
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
[1] J.M. Dubois, Useful Quasicrystals, World Scientific, Singapore, 2005. [2] R. Gaspari, R. Erni, Y. Arroyo, M. Parlinska-Wojtan, J. Dshemuchadse, C.A. Pignedoli, D. Passerone, P. Schmutz, A. Beni, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 47 (2014), doi:10.1107/S1600576714008656. [3] J. Dolinsek, P. Jeglic, M. Komelj, S. Vrtnik, A. Smontara, I. Smiljanic, A. Bilusic, J. Ivkov, D. Stanic, E.S. Zijlstra, B. Bauer, P. Gille, Physical Review B, 76 (2007) 174207-174213. [4] E. Ura-Binczyk, N. Homazava, A. Ulrich, R. Hauert, M. Lewandowska, K.J. Kurzydlowski, P. Schmutz, Corrosion Science, 53 (2011) 1825-1837. [5] A. Beni, N. Ott, E. Ura-Binczyk, M. Rasinski, B. Bauer, P. Gille, A. Ulrich, P. Schmutz, Electrochimica Acta, 56 (2011) 10524-10532. [6] N. Ott, A. Beni, A. Ulrich, C. Ludwig, P. Schmutz, Talanta, 120 (2014) 230. [7] S. Hofmann, Auger- and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy in Materials Science, 2013. [8] E. Panda, L.P.H. Jeurgens, E.J. Mittemeijer, Corrosion Science, 52 (2010) 2556-2564. [9] J.K. Parle, A. Beni, V.R. Dhanak, J.A. Smerdon, P. Schmutz, M. Wardé, M.G. Barthés-Labrousse, B. Bauer, P. Gille, H.R. Sharma, R. McGrath, Applied Surface Science, 283 (2013) 276-282. [10] J. Zegenhagen, C. Kunz, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 547 (2005) V. [11] J. Rubio-Zuazo, G.R. Castro, Surface and Interface Analysis, 40 (2008) 1438-1443. [12] B. Bauer, P. Gille, Zeitschrift Fur Anorganische Und Allgemeine Chemie, 637 (2011) 2052-2058. [13] J. Zegenhagen, B. Detlefs, T.-L. Lee, S. Thiess, H. Isern, L. Petit, L. André, J. Roy, Y. Mi, I. Joumard, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 178–179 (2010) 258-267. [14] W. Fredriksson, S. Malmgren, T. Gustafsson, M. Gorgoi, K. Edström, Applied Surface Science, 258 (2012) 5790-5797. [15] J. van den Brand, W.G. Sloof, H. Terryn, J.H.W. de Wit, Surface and Interface Analysis, 36 (2004) 8188. [16] M. Liu, S. Zanna, H. Ardelean, I. Frateur, P. Schmutz, G.L. Song, A. Atrens, P. Marcus, Corrosion Science, 51 (2009) 1115-1127. [17] S. Tanuma, C.J. Powell, D.R. Penn, Surface and Interface Analysis, 43 (2011) 689-713.
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Highlights
SC
RI
• HAXPES characterisation of electrochemical passivation layers for Al-Cr-Fe CMA’s.
NU
• Oxide and hydroxide signals identified for Al 2s/Cr 2p photoelectron core levels.
MA
• Shallow and deep core levels analysed to achieve diverse surface sensitivity.
TE
D
• Cr 18% at concentration threshold necessary for stable passivation at pH 1 H2SO4.
AC CE P
• X-ray energy variation for cations and hydroxide/oxide distribution identification.
14