Tectonophysics,
167
103 (1984) 167-114
Elsevier Science Publishers
B.V., Amsterdam
HEAT FLOW, RADIOGENIC SOUTHWEST
RI.
- Printed
in The Netherlands
HEAT AND CRUSTAL
THICKNESS
IN
U.S.S.R.
KUTAS
Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian S.S. R., Kiev (U.S.S.R.) (Received
December
15, 1982; revision accepted
April 20, 1983)
ABSTRACT
Kutas,
RI.,
1984. Heat flow, radiogenic
L. Rybach
and D.S. Chapman
Lithosphere.
Tectonophysics,
The heat flow distribution thermal generation
energy
outflow
of a different
heat generation
The position values decrease continents
over the southwestern the deeper
Heat
U.S.S.R. during
layers. The former
in subsurface
is not an isothermal
with increasing
mantle
age. The latter
of the M-discontinuity
The M-discontinuity
thickness
Terrestrial
in southwest
Flow
Studies
U.S.S.R. and
In: V. CermBk,
the Structure
of the
103: 167-174.
in the upper Iithospheric
field in structures radiogenic
from
heat and crustal
(Editors),
crustal
shows that the crust-mantle
is dependent
tectonic
is responsible
is manifest
on two major
activation
and
for different
in the linear
factors:
the radiogenic
the heat
levels of the thermal
dependence
of heat flow on
layers of the earth’s crust. correlates
weakly
surface.
However,
thickness. interface
with heat flow and temperature within structures
An analysis cannot
of the thermodynamic
be explained
distribution.
of the same age, heat flow
by the gabbro
conditions
on the
to eclogite transition.
INTRODUCTION
In recent years it has become
clear that heat flow distribution
involves
a number
of relationships which are of great importance for understanding both the nature of the thermal field and its anomalies. These are: (a) heat flow density dependence on the age of tectonic and magmatic activity; (b) linear relationship between heat flow density and specific radiogenic heat generation in the subsurface layer of the earth’s crust; (c) heat flow density correlation with lithospheric thickness. All these relationships are far from being universal. In any given region they have specific features depending on the evolution and structure of the region. Here, we present an analysis of these features for the territory of the southwestern part of the U.S.S.R. The region considered has a complex geologic structure. Its most stable part is the southwestern slope of the East European Platform. The platform basement is composed of Archean and Proterozoic sediments and volcanic rocks metamorphosed 0040-1951/84/$03.00
0 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers
B.V.
to various degrees (from greenstones to granulite facies) and granitoid on the Ukrainian Shield. In the south and southwest, the old platform Paleozoic
units of the Donbass.
structures
of the Caucasus.
The complexity crust. Crustal number
of geologic
thickness
of interfaces km/s
evolution
ranges
Crimea
and Dobruja
among
basement
(Sollogub
is reflected
in the structure
of the earth’s
the earth’s crust, a great
which most reliably
surface and interface
and Chekunov.
and Meso-Cenozoic
and the Carpathians.
from 25 to 65 km. Within
are found.
where) are the crystalline of 6.8-7.0
Stepnoy
the Black Sea Depression
outcropping is frins:ed by
identified
(not every-
Cz with boundary
velocities
1980).
HEATFLOW
On the territory studied, the heat flow density ranges from 25 to 115 mW/m’ (Kutas, 1978). The heat flow distribution is closely related to the tectonics and geological
evolution.
with certain
Several geothermal
tectonic
zones can be distinguished
units. A zone of low heat flows (25-55
which coincide
mW/m*)
the southwestern part of the Precambrian East European Platform, Ukrainian Shield. Low heat flows are also preserved in depressions formed on the ancient Foredeep,
Peri-Black
basement
in the Mesozoic
Heat
flow peaks
(70-115
evolving
Of a special interest
during
overthrusts
are observed
the Mesozoic-Cenozoic
Eras (the Carpathian
is related
to tectonic
such as the Scythian within
the units
era (the Caucasus,
is the area of the East Carpathians.
tectogenesis,
mW/m*). This discrepancy can, evidently, be explained
mW/m’)
by the Paleozoic,
mW/m*)
intensely
to the Alpine
field (50-70
their evolution
Crimea). related
over
Sea Trough).
The next level of the thermal which had completed Donbass, Dobruja.
and Cenozoic
extends
including the and troughs
that
units Plate. were
Carpathians,
Its formation
but the heat flow here is relatively
is
low (50-65
between the heat flow density and the age of the unit by the fact that the folded area of the East Carpathians
older structure.
In the southwest of the U.S.S.R., the heat flow thus tends to decrease with the However, within individual units considerable increasing age of the structure. variations of heat flow are observed. These are caused by several factors. Firstly, the heat flow distribution reflects the duration and multiphase nature of structure evolution in the course of repeated activation periods. Secondly. the heat flow variation is affected by the processes on which the nature of tectonic activity to their effects on crustal depends and by thermal energy outflow. According processes tending evolution, these processes can be of two types: constructive towards formation of the continental crust and destructive processes directed to disintegration of the crust. Thirdly, the existence of heat flow variations are due to varying conditions of heat transfer and irregular distribution of heat flow sources, primarily radiogenic ones.
169
It is
evident
must
eliminate
heat
sources
processes, parison, clearly.
that in comparing
the heat flow density
the effects of inhomogeneities distribution
including
the dependence Figure
and analyse
the anomalies
both the constructive between
territories.
related
and destructive
the heat flow density
1 and Table I show this dependence
and the adjacent
with the structural
in the geologic
of a geosynclinal
and in the
to uniform
energetic
ones. With such a com-
and the age is revealed
for the southwest
In this case the structural
time of the active development
age one
sequence
fairly
of the USSR
age is understood
to be the
process.
In the thermal history of any region, two stages, progressive and regressive, can be marked out. These thermal history stages in different tectonic zones have their own
80
I
m.y.
80
60
8
Fig. 1. Correlation Individual
between
dots are numbered
the mean heat flow density according
and geological
to data in Table 1.
age (t) of the geological
structure:
170
TABLE
I
Mean heat flow density Tectonic
No.
of the main geologic unit
1.
Caucasus
2.
Carpathians
units in the southwest
(1 (m.y.)
of the U.S.S.R. * ,I
‘2 (m.y.)
(4,Wm
*)
80-
25
30
80+15
11
loo-
45
45
77+38
28 40
3.
Crimea
180-140
150
6X+13
4.
North DobruJa
230-180
180
64
5.
Donbass
285-260
260
51*
6.
Scythian
285-260
260
62+13
12x
7.
Hercynian
330-290
29u
60tl2
x2
450-410
420
50
Central
Plate
Central * No.-number
Europe
structure;
features,
Europe
y-mean
their physical
progressive activity
in
of point in Fig. 1; r, --time
of geological
and thermal
the earth’s
crust
conductively
and
of active evolution
heat flow density;
essence
stage of thermal
and subsequently
material
19
in
Caledonian
8.
4 1
being
unchanged.
evolution
geothermal
(Khain,
n-number
upper
mantle.
and convectively.
During
1972): f2 -age
For any type of structure,
multiple
energy from the earth’s interior,
1970: Garetsky.
of heat flow measurements.
is characterized activity,
x
by an increase transport
of tectonic
of the deep-seated
and a temperature
this stage,
increase
heat is transported
The role of one or the other
the
mechanism
in
both of heat
transport changes with depth and time. At great depths and in disturbed zones convection dominates whereas in the earth’s crust conductive energy transport prevails. The regressive
stage is characterized
energy scatter and a cooling
by a decrease of tectonic
of the earths
activity
crust and upper mantle.
and thermal
The dependence
of the heat flow density on the age of the structures reflects the regressive stage of thermal evolution. The thermal regime of geosynclinal areas is being stabilized throughout decreases
a 400-500 linearly
m.y. period. During this time interval, the heat flow density with t Ii2 . This fact is consistent with lithosphere cooling according
to the heat conduction HEAT
FLOW
law.
AND RADIOGENIC
HEAT GENERATION
A correlation between the heat flow density and heat generation in the subsurface layer should exist everywhere. It is derived from the solution of the one-dimension stationary equation of heat conduction and is written in the case of a stratified medium as: n ”
Y=,~,4w,=A,(rb,
+
c 4(z)z,
n=2
171
or in the usual form of
where q is the surface heat flow density, the heat flow penetrating
the bottom
and whose heat generation
heat flow or the density
of
is z,
is A,(z).
zr and q. are defined
The coordinates and they generally
q,, is the reduced
of the upper active layer whose thickness
by the mode of the heat source distribution
vary from point to point. They can, however, retain their constant
values within large areas where the heat distribution at depth obeys the same law. To study the relationship between heat flow density and radiogenic heat generation in the subsurface
layer of the earth’s crust below the Ukrainian
Shield,
rocks
were sampled from 50 boreholes 200-1000 m deep where heat flow density had been measured. The values of U, Th and K were determined. The heat generation values averaged
over the borehole
were compared
to the mean heat flow density
(Gerasi-
mov et al., 1982). Figure
2 gives the results of the comparison.
large and the linear
dependence
between
The scatter of data points
the heat flow density
is rather
and radiogenic
heat
generation in subsurface rocks is difficult to derive. However, such dependence is valid for individual tectonic elements, and geologic units of a similar evolution and structure
show similar
dependences.
The points
in Fig. 2 can be divided
into three
: g
0
_C--
_o- -
*-
-+
a III
6
2 4 w 2:
01
10
a.2
03
HEAT Fig. 2. Heat flow density as a function and
Volynsk
Platform
Orekhovo-Pavlograd
III-q=
23+4.2A.
Blocks;
Geosynclinal
e4
5,
Zones;
+6
+7
p W&
GENERATION,
of heat generation. 4,
x5
I = Kirovograd
Granitic
6 = Odessa-Belaya
Tserkov,
7 = Perzhansk
I-
Massif.
Massif; 2, 3 = Podolsk
Krivoy
q = 24 + 12.6A;
Rog-Kremenchug,
If - q = 24 + 8A ;
groups,
corresponding
to certain
types of structure;
for each group
the equation
y =f( A) can be written. A first dependence rift-like
zones
second
is expressed
composed
sediments
(q = 24 + 8A) describes
dependence
blocks
built of various
metamorphic
and
the heat
volcanic
formations.
flow behaviour
rocks of predominantly
(q = 23 + 4.2A) is derived
third dependence
q = 24 + 12.64; it is valid for narrow
by equation
of metamorphic
A
in platform
amphibolite
from data on a granitoid
facies. A
terrain.
Attention should be drawn to an uncertainty revealed by comparing heat flow density to radiogenic heat generation in the subsurface layer. This uncertainty is connected element
with essential content
variations
in a subsurface
high in the zone of erosion decreases density
remains
fore, the character essentially
averaged.
It is evident
heat generation
depends
1982). Searches
in the crustal supposed
On the contrary,
is generally
rocks.
m, whereas
increases
heat flow density
It often
the heat flow
with depth.
There-
and radiogenic
over which these quantities
of comparison,
to depths
been
for a correlation
concentration
dependence
the radioactive
content
of crystalline
as 150-200
on the interval
has often
of the radiogenic
thickness.
portion
and
element
are being
the heat flow density
as great as 400-500
heat and
m.
THICKNESS
assumptions direct
between
should be averaged
flow density
flow density
or it slightly
that for the purpose
HEAT FLOW AND CKUSTAL
Kutas,
as shallow
either constant
of the relation
generation
Heat
and the upper
a few times at a depth generally
of the heat
layer. The radioactive
related
to crustal
between
thickness
(cermhk,
these parameters
were based on
nature of the heat flow and a high radioactive rocks. However, between
these comparisons
the heat
a heat flow increase
flow density is observed
1979; element
did not confirm and
the earth’s
the crust
in many areas of crustal
thinning. A comparison of crustal thickness with heat flow density and temperature distribution for different age structures is given in Fig. 3. Also shown are the phase boundary
occurrence
of gabbro-eclogite
and the solidus
temperature
for dry basic
rocks. As seen from Fig. 3, heat flow density is independent on the M-discontinuity position for the region as a whole but within the structures of one type and age the plunge of the M-discontinuity is constantly accompanied by a heat flow decrease. This law is particularly pronounced within young structures of the Alpine belt. Thus, the heat flow density depends directly on the thickness of the upper active layer and is inversely proportional to the crustal thickness as a whole. This suggests. first, a very low content of radioactive elements in the lower crust and a dominating contribution of the upper mantle to the sum magnitude of heat flow and, second, a great influence of thermal energy on the formation and the evolution of the earth’s crust. The M-discontinuity
is not an isothermal
surface. At the crust-mantle
boundary,
173
TEMPERA.TURE,
“C
1500
1000
500
5t
E Y r 5 P w n x5
lO( I-
15(IFig. 3. Depth temperature mW/m*.
Curves
correspond value
M’M” thickness
3 = Paleozoic
5 = zones of young
tectonic
1966). T, -sohdus
in the same
structure
Curves A and B determine Green,
on heat flow density.
the M-discontinuity
Curve parameters
position
depending
to mean heat flow values for 1’ x lo grid in the specific
of crustal
Platform,
dependence restrict
area.
(Hercynian),
and magmatic regions
I = Ukrainian
Shield,
4 = Meso-Cenozoic
are heat flow densities
tectonic
province
versus the mean
2 = Precambrian
structures
in
on the heat flow value. Dots
of Caucasus
East-European and Carpathians,
activity.
of stability
for gabbro.
curve for dry basic rocks (Green
garnet
granulite
and Ringwood,
and eclogite
(Ringwood
and
1967).
the temperatures vary from 430’ to 930°C. However, within the structures of the same age the temperature deviations do not exceed 150”-200°C. A comparison of these temperatures with the thermodynamic conditions of the gabbro-garnet granulite-eclogite phase transition led to the conclusion that the occurrence of the M-discontinuity is not associated with that phase transition. Under the shields and ancient platforms the crust-mantle boundary is situated within the eclogite stability area, whereas it is situated within the area of the garnet granulite stability under the active areas. It may be assumed that the occurrence of an intermediate velocities of 7.3-7.8 km/s is associated with the basalt-garnet granulite
layer with transition.
174
In zones with very high heat flow the low velocity partial melting of the mantle rocks. All these features nature
of the thermal
regime
of the inverse heat flow density
hand, thermal
energy flow determines
and crustal
dependence
ascends.
This causes
products active
of active tectonic
of destruction
region.
where thermal is formed
in cool zones. Meanwhile,
and upper
mantle
leads to additional
changes.
forced
thickness
energy outflow is intense,
melting
mantle
crust. matter
of the crust.
out to the periphery
here increases.
Thus,
The
of the
in the zones
a thin crust is formed. whereas a thick crust
total thermal
conductivity
of the earth’s crust
In areas of a thin crust it is significantly
concentration
On the one
of the crust. on the
and melted
and partial
are being
the crustal
from
suggest a double
thickness.
and thickness
the heated
extension
and melting
As a result,
results
by the formed inhomogeneous
processes,
destruction,
structure
on crustal
the structure
other hand. the heat flow is being redistributed In the period
layer obviously
higher. which
of heat in these areas.
REFERENCES
cerrnik,
V.. 1979. Heat flow map of Europe.
Flow in Europe. Garetsky,
Springer,
In: V. i‘ermak
Berlin-Heidelberg-New
R.G., 1972. Tektonika
molodykh
and L. Rybach
platform
Evrazii. Nauka,
Moscow.
Gerasimov, Yu.G.. Gorlitsky, B.A. and Kutas, R.I., 1982. Sopostavleniye radiogennogo Green,
tepla na Ukrainskom
D.H. and Ringwood,
shchite.
(Editors).
Terrestrial
Heat
York, pp. 3-40. 180 pp.
(eplovogo
potoka
s generatsiey
Geofiz. Zh.. 4: 76-80.
A.E.. 1967. The genesis of basaltic
magmas.
Contrib.
Mineral.
Petrol., 15(2):
103-190. Khain, W.E.. 1970. Usloviya pkoyasa. Kutas,
zalozhenia
i osnovnye
etapy razvitiya
Sredizemnomorskogo
geosinklinal’nogo
Vestn. Mosk. Univ.. Ser. Geol., No. 2: 36-72.
R.I., 1978. Pole teplovogo
potoka
i termicheskaya
model zemnoy kori. Izd. Naukova
Dumka.
Kiev,
140 pp. Kutas,
R.I.,
1982. Thickness
Geothermics Ringwood,
A.E. and Green,
mation Sollogub,
of earth’s
and Geothermal D.H..
and some geophysical V.B. and Chekunov.
zemnoy
kori i vozrastu
Centralnoy 147-156.
i Vostochnoy
Energy.
crust
and
heat
Schweizerbart,
1966. An experimental consequences.
R. Haenel
(Editors),
pp. 27-30. of the gabbro-eclogite
transfor-
3: 385-427.
Centralnoy
In: V.B. Sollogub
Evropi po geofizicheskim
In: V. i‘ermhk,
investigation
Tectonophysics,
A.V., 1980. Rayonirovaniye eyo osnovaniya.
flow. Stuttgart,
i Vostochnoy
et al. (Editors).
issledovaniyam.
Evropi po tolshchine Struktura
Izd. Naukova
zemnoy
Dumka,
kori
Kiev. pp.