Vol. 61, No. 1, 1974
BIOCHEMICAL
AND EIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
HEME COMPLEXES OF RABBIT HEMOPEXIN,
HUMAN HEHOPEXIN AND HUMAN SERUM ALBUMIN:
ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE AND M:SSBAUER SPECTROSCOPIC STUDIES Alan
J.
Bearden,
WI1 1 lam T. Morgan’
Donner
Laboratory, Berkeley,
Scripps
Received
Muller-Eberhard
Unlversi ty of Cal ifornia California 54720 and of Biochemistry and Research Foundation California 52037
Department Clinic La Jolla,
September
, and Ursula
20,1974 SUMMARY
The electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of human and rabbit ferriheme-hemopexln complexes at 3O0K show an ESR absorption characterized by = 1.60, g 2.25 and g 2.86, characteristic of low-spin ferriheme9, TKe low-spin nature of the heme-iron in heme-hemopexin 1~ proteins. corroborated b the observation of nuclear hyperflne splltting in Mdssbauer spectra at 4.2 g K. The similarity of the ESR spectra of ferriheme-hemopexin wlth those of low-spin cytochromas which coordinate heme r&z two histidine residues points to a similar coordination mechanism in hemopexin. in contrast, the ESR spectra of the 1:l and 2:1 complexes of heme with human serum albumin display signals at g = 6.0 and g = 2.0, characteristic of high-spin ferrihemeproteins. Two porphyrin-binding found
in mammalian
proteins,
serum
one mole of hemeL with circulating
and reduced
resemble
those
with
recent
tion
studies via
Hemopexin,
a higher
affinity
heme to the hepatocytes
oxidized
nated
(1).
hemopexin
heme-hemopexin
of low-spin
magnetic (8)
‘To whom correspondence Research Foundat ion. ‘Abbreviations spin resonance;
circular
than
that residues. should
unlike This
the heme iron
be addressed
265
transports
spectra
of both
those
of albumin
observation
show that
at Scripps
the Clinic
IX;
(1,4),
In conjunction
in heme-hemopexin
The MCD data
binds
(2-4),
(MCD) (7) and chemical
used are: heme, Iron-protoporphyrin MCD, magnetic circular dichroism.
Copyright 0 1974 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
which
albumin
Absorption
(1,6),
dichroism
have been
a B-glycoprotein
heme proteins.
indicate
two hfstidlne
(5).
and albumin,
modificais coordireduced and
ESR, electron
Vol. 61, No. 1,1974
heme-hemopexin
BIOCHEMICAL
complex
of the oxidized
known
spin
do not distinguish neither
state
the
the
residues
of methemalbumin
spin
state
involved
in
are definitely
(1,4).
are useful
heme proteins. these
but
In contrast,
nor the
Low temperature scopy
is low-spin
complex.
heme coordination
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
electron
spin
in establlshing In this
techniques
resonance the spin
communication,
(ESR) and Mgssbauer state
of the
we report
in oxidized
on the application
and human heme-hemopexin
to rabbit
iron
spectro-
as well
of
as human
methemalbumin. MATERIALS AND METHODS The apo-hemopexins purity
(6) and their
described.
of rabblt concentrations
Human heme-hemopexin
of the Behringwerke,
and human were
Marburg,
determined was also
Germany.
1:
tested
donated
RABBIT
by Dr.
G. Schwlck
was prepared
by
HEMOPEXIN
ESR spectrum of rabbit heme-hemopexin at 30°K. frequency, 9.263 spectrometer conditions were: power to cavity, 1OmW; modulation, 1OG. Protein concentration was 7.5 mg/ml.
266
for
(9) as previously
Human albumin
g = 2.86
Figure
isolated,
The GHz,
VoL61,No.
1,1974
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
COMMUNICATIONS
RESEARCH
g=F6
g = 2.26
Figure
ESR spectra of human heme-hemopexin at 30’K. Trace was obtained from a sample prepared as described in Materials and Methods, and Trace B from a preparation from the Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany. The spectrometer conditions were the same as In Figure 1. The protein concentration was 13 mg/ml.
2:
zone
electrophoresis
Chemicals) (Fe
was
III)
heme
employing added
in
heme-hemopexin
with
protein
(6,ii).
and
hemeproteins
0.02
M sodium
phosphate,
with
0.05
M EDTA.
from
(a
gift
of
rabbit
7.5
of
Dr.
to
against
triple-distilled X-band
M sodium
ESR spectra
2:1
were
by
and
concentrations mg/ml.
For was
The phosphate
optical
sample
at
in was
buffer,
for
against borate,
ESR
spectroscopy, a I:1
molar
lyophilized pH 7.4,
pH 9.3,
studies 57Fe-heme
ratio after
0.05
of
spectra
4’
M sodium
employed
added
amount
absorption
0.02
&sbauer
Organic
oxidized
an equimolar
dialyzed
7.4,
(Eastman
Fully
mixing by
or
heme
ratio.
exhaustively
6.3
Caughey)
and
molar
characterized
pH
13.0
apo-hemopexin. 0.02
was
or
(lo),
obtained
Protein
W.S.
against
a 1:1 was
The
ranged
Pevikon
A
M EDTA,
85 mg
to dialysis and
then
water. were
recorded
at
267
30°K
using
a modified
JEOL
ME-IX
Vol.61,No.
1,1974
BIOCHEMICAL
spectrometer
(12)
controlled
and the
temperature
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Mgssbauer
conditions
spectra
were
obtained
(13)
under
at 4’K and 200’K.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The ESR spectra
taken
(Fig.
2) heme-hemopexin
2.26,
and 2.86,
iron.
These
PH 11.5
(9
-
(g = 1.75,
values
are
1.68,
2.28
heme or heme bound and rabblt
(11)
2),
fluorlde,
to denatured
protein.
state
for
of ferric b5 at
b2 at pH 12.1
human heme-hemopexln signals
due to small
at g = 4.3
amounts
The ESR spectra spectrum
by pH over
of 1.60,
cytochrome
cytochrome
the absorption
unaffected
heme-hemopexln a ligand
not display
forms
an altered
sample
30°K,
ESR spectrum
lts
treated
which
when this
the
at 20°C with
a high
was heated
to 85’~
(Fig.
for
3B) showed
to the high-spin
treatment
produced
denatured
forms
gels
shown).
Repiaclng
a ligand
(not
heme-hemopexin
wlth
complex.
Carbon
hemopexin
(1).
Missbauer and 200°K
shows only a quadrupole
form with
fluoride
monoxide,
spectra
of free
for
both
of rabblt
range
human deutero-
pH 6.3
splltting
of 2.25
(Fig.
one minute that
to 9.3
readily
3A).
However, at
This
heat
on polyacrylamide
heme iron
complexes
in native its with
ferrl-
cyanide ferroheme-
ferroheme-hemopexin
The spectrum
of Missbauer
268
heme,
and re-examined
of 6 and 2.
rabbit
mm/set
of
accessible
as is forming
4.
excess
most of the heme was
of the
in Figure
molar
wlth
of heme-hemopexln
of ” Fe-enriched
pair
complex
g values
however,
quadrupole
a five
at 30°K
is difficult
are depicted
a single
spin
ESR spectrum
converted
4.2’K
observed
and the minor
probably
were
(S = l/2)
and for
1 and 2) are
like
at g-values
The two different
(Fig.
1) and human
shown). Rabbit
dld
(14)
(15).
(Fig.
absorptions
to those
and 2.82)
heme-hemopexin
heme-hemopexin (not
similar
identical
(Figs.
rabbit
of a low spin
and 2.70)
were
and g = 2.0
show principal
characteristic
2.24
preparatlons
at 30°K of both
absorption
and an isomer
shift
taken
at at 200’K
lines of -0.20
with mn/sec
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 61, No. 1,1974
Figure 3:
relative
Effect of fluoride on the ESR spectra of rabbit hemehemopex 1n . The ESR spectrometer conditions were the same as in Figure I. Trace A was obtained at 30°K after exposure of the protein to a five molar excess and Trace B of sodium fluoride at room tern erature after heating the sample to 85 g C for one minute and re-examinlng it at 30°K.
to a 57 Fe:Pt
values
of quadrupole
source
for
low-spin
spectrum
does not allow
state.
features position;
this
in other
low-spin
(Fig.
prominent
g-values
compounds
(13,16);
a definite
assignment
at g, = g
5B) Y
the
nevertheless, spin
pattern
These
range thls
or oxida-
shows additional at the 57Fe
hyperflne
effect
shown
(16).
the ESR spectra (Fig.
are withln
Interaction
to the nuclear
ferrihemeproteins
to Fe metal.
of either
absorption
hyperfine
similar
referred
shift
of a nuclear
5A) and 2:l
ne~‘s+z
and isomer
the MbJssbauer
is quite
In contrast, a 1 :I
Fe (III)
At 4.2’K, indicative
or +0.27
splitting
expected
tion
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of human serum albumin ratio
of heme to protein
= 6 and g, = 2.
269
at 30°K with
The observed
show ESR signals,
Vol. 61, No. 1, 1974
BIOCHEMICAL
e
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
mm/set
9=2
g=6
1
-1
270
VoL61,No.
which
were
typical any
BIOCHEMICAL
1,1974
proportional
of
high
rhombic
seen
spin
of
12’K
and
conclusion,
reported
here
the
is ESR
known
is independent
have
dihistidyl
that
the
evidence
amount
of
ferric
hemeproteins
heme
No
heme.
ESR
and
the
RESEARCH
bound
low-spin
Mgssbauer
to
the
and
do
Fe
nature
(7),
low-spin oxidation
(III)
heme in
of of
the
state.
ferriheme-hemopexln
heme
spectra
low-spin
also of
of
BIOPHYSICAL
COMMUNICATIONS
protein, not
are
indicate
signals
were
lOOoK.
demonstrate
spectra
to
the
the
ferroheme-hemopexin protein
the
(S = 5/2)
distortion
between In
to
AND
ferriheme-hemopexin
this
spin
state
Further, to
those
(17),
coordination
heme-hemopexin
is
of
the of
Since
complex. this
resemblance
cytochrome provides
similarly
hemeof
b5
(lb),
additional coordinated.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Foundation Laboratory,
research was supported by grants from the National Science (GB-13585), the Atomic Energy Commission through the Donner and the National Institutes of Health (HE-08660, HO-04445, AM-16737). A.J.B. is the recipient of a Career Development Award #GM-24,494, U.M.E. of Career Development Award #AM-16,823, and W.T.M. of post-doctoral fellowship #AM-53050 from the National Institutes of Health. 57 Fe-heme We are indebted to Dr. Winslow S. Caughey for the gift of and to Susan Wormsley for expert technical assistance.
REFERENCES
1. 2.
Mu1 ler-Eberhard, (in press). Seery, V.L.,
U., and
and
W.T.
Morgan,
Muller-Eberhard,
U.
(1374) (1373)
Ann. J.
N.Y.
8141.
Acad.
Sci.
Chem.
248,
J.
Biochem.
3796-3800. 3.
Hrkal,
2,
Z.,
Vodrgka,
Z.,
and
Kalousek,
I.
(1974)
Eur.
73-78.
Figure
4:
&ssbauer spectra at 200°K
Figure
5:
ESR are: (B) the was
spectra of we-t-e obtained (upper trace)
57 Fe-heme-hemopexin. rabbit on 85 mg of lyophllized and at 4.2’K (lower
The material trace).
spectra of human methemalbumin at 30’K. Shown (A) 1 :l molar ratio of heme to protein and 2:l ratio. ESR spectrometer conditions were same as in Figure 1. The protein concentration 8 mg/ml.
271
Vol. 61, No. 1, 1974
4. 5. 6.
I: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Beaven, G.H., Chen, S.-H., D’Albis, A., and Gratter, W.B. (1574) Eur. J. Biochem. 2, 535-546. Huller-Eberhard, U., Bosman, C., and Liem, H.H. (1970) J. Lab. Clin. Med. & 426-431. Hrkal, z., and Mulier-Eberhard, U. (1971) Biochemistry 10, 1746-1750. Vickery, L.E., and Morgan, W.T., manuscript In preparat‘f;jn. Seery, V.L., Morgan, W.T., and Muller-Eberhard, U., manuscript in oreoaration. seery, V.L., Hathaway, G., and Muller-Eberhard, U. (1372) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. l& 269-272. MBller-Eberhard, H.J. (1360) Stand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. l2, 33-37. Morgan, W.T., and Muller-Eberhard, U. (1572) J. Blol. Chem. 247, 7181-7187. Bearden, A.J., and Malkin, R. (1972) Biochim. Blophys. Acta 3, 456-468. Moss, T.H., Bearden, A.J., Bartsch, R.G., Cusanovich, M.A., and San Pietro, A. (1368) Biochemistr 7 i53i-1586. Bois-Pol toratsky, R., a73+ an E ren erg, A. (1967) Eur. J. Biochem. 2, 361-365. Watari, H., Groudinsky, O., and Labeyrie, F. (1867) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 131, 592-594. -Caughey, W.S., Fujimoto, W.Y., Bearden, A.J., and Moss, T.H. (1966) and Argos,
272
P. (1972)
J. Mol.
Biol.
e,