High porosity for cometary dust: evidence from PROGRA2 experiment

High porosity for cometary dust: evidence from PROGRA2 experiment

H i g h porosity for cometary dust: evidence f r o m P R O G R A 2 e x p e r i m e n t E. Hadamcik a, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd a, J.B. Renard b, J.C. Wo...

265KB Sizes 0 Downloads 55 Views

H i g h porosity for cometary dust: evidence f r o m P R O G R A 2 e x p e r i m e n t E. Hadamcik a, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd a, J.B. Renard b, J.C. Worms c aA6ronomie/CNRS/IPSL/Universit6 PARIS VI, BP3, 91371 Vem~res, France bLPCE-CNRS, 3A av. de la Recherche Scientifique, 45071 Orl6ans-cedex, France CESSC-ESF, Parc d'Innovation, Boulevard S. Brandt, 67400 Illkirch, France Laboratory measurements undertaken with the PROGRA 2 experiment on compact and fluffy particles floating in microgravity or lifted by an air draft are studied. The polarimetric phase curves of mixtures of aggregates of high porosity (95 to 99 %) built of submicron grains are consistent with the properties observed in cometary comae. The results suggest that the porosity of cometary particles is higher than 95 % and that their sizes may reach one millimetre. 1. INTRODUCTION To deduce the physical properties of cometary dust, some diagnostics are often used: i.e. dynamical models for spatial evolution of brightness of the scattered light and spectral emission features. The linear polarization of the scattered light is another important diagnostic. Polarimetric phase curves have allowed a classification of comets in two classes, although comet C/1995 O1 Hale-Bopp has been found to have a higher polarization than the other comets [1,2,3]. Polarimetric maps emphasize variations in the physical properties inside the coma (e.g. [4,5,2,6]). In addition, the wavelength dependence for polarization or brightness provide a complementary diagnostic ([7,8]). To tentatively interpret the observations some models of light scattering by the particles have been built. The particles are assumed to be compact grains (spheres or irregular particles) or aggregates with a relatively small number of constituent grains (due to computational limitations). For all these models, size is a main parameter. This paper compares cometary polarimetric phase curves with results obtained for linear polarization of light scattered by large particles (compact and fluffy) studied with the PROGRA 2 instrument [9] which is a type of nephelometer. The compact particles levitate in microgravity, the fluffy ones are lifted in ground-based conditions by an air draft (Hadamcik, 1999). These particles are difficult to model due to their irregular shapes and the high number of grains (hundreds of thousands). - 274-

High porosity for cometary dust: evidence from PROGRA 2 experiment

2. SAMPLES The size distribution of the particles is in the 10 lam to 500 gm range depending on the sample. The irregular compact particles are mainly convex with sharp edges as described by Worms et al. [9]. Two different types of fluffy particles have been used, ground Orgueil meteorite (porosity 30 %; size 1 gm, see [11]); fluffy samples made of submicron grains (pyrogenic oxides, carbon black and mixtures of them, described in [ 10]). The smallest grain size (7 nm) is for a pyrogneic silica sample, the largest one for a carbon black sample (95 nm). These grains are linked together in chains giving aggregates. The size of the aggregates is of the order of ten micrometers and their porosity is higher than 95 %, with a specific surface area in the range of 50-300 m 2 g-1. The densities of the grains are given by the company who provides the samples, the densities of the aggregates are estimated by measuring hardly packed powders. These aggregates stick together in agglomerates. When levitated, the particles in the field of view are such agglomerates. The densities of the agglomerates are estimated by measuring sifted powders. 3. RESULTS The measurements are performed between 8 ~ and 160 ~ phase angles. Figure 1 gives a summary of typical phase curves in red light. Figure la is for compact particles, figure lb for fluffy particles. We are mainly interested in two regions: the backscattering region at small phase angles and the maximum polarization (Pmax) region.

3.1. Backscattering region For phase angles smaller than 20 ~, three facts can be noticed. First, for compact particles (i.e. basalt), the polarization is negative or close to zero for different sizes of the particles [9]. For levitating fluffy particles (i.e. pyrogenic silica with 16 nm grains, pyrogenic silica with 40 nm grains), the polarization sharply increases near 10~ ~ phase angle. This is not the case for mixtures of two fluffy samples; they produce a negative branch at phase angles smaller than 20 ~ (the studied samples are: silica 16 nm and silica 40 nm; silica 40 nm and carbon 14 nm; silica 40 nm and carbon 95 nm; alumina 13 nm and carbon 14 nm).

3.2. Maximum polarization region 3.2.1. Size dependence In figure 2a three different materials for compact particles are studied, emax increases when the particles size (mean diameter of the single grain) increases, with a different maximum value for each material, as expected from Fresnel laws. In figure 2b two materials of fluffy particles (pyrognenic silica and carbon black) are considered. Pmax decreases when the size of the constituent grains (mean diameter) increases. When the size is smaller than 15 nm (size parameter of about 0.07 in red light) Rayleigh scattering is observed. Pmax for a mixture of two size distributions of pyrogenic silica is smaller than Pmax for the constituent samples. More generally, a lower Pmaxthan those obtained for the component materials is observed for all the studied mixtures of fluffy particles.

-275-

E. Hadamcik et aL

1

O0

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

~

i

Basalt (compact)

80v

t= el)

o ( 5 - 15) ~m

60-

- - -fit

.m

INi ..i Ii_

40

Q

2O

X ( 4 0 - 5 0 ) ~tm ..... f i t + (95-125)~m ......... f i t

xz. 4,4,+-t-..... +.

9 J.-q:q T M ,

"l~

,,i,, 8 0 -

....

.I,~,

0 1 O0

.........

I

I I

I

I

I

I I

I

i

b

I

I

I

I

I

I

i

I

' I

I

~.+dr

Silica (fl uffy)

v

60- - x - - ( 4 0 + 2 0 ) nm - + - ( 1 6 • 4) nm - ~ - - M i x t u re

r -rill"

9N

.WI,

402o-

/3t.

0

2Y '

'

'

'

I

50

'

'

'

'

I

'

'

1O0

'

'

I

'

150

Phase angle(~ Figure 1. Polarimetric measurements (with error bars) and phase curves for different sizes of the grains, a) Compact particles in microgravity, b) Fluffy particles lifted in air.

3.2.2. Wavelength dependence To study the wavelength dependence, a red and a green laser were used. For all the studied compact samples, the maximum value of polarization is found higher in green light than in red light. The same result was found for Orgueil meteorite [ 11]. For the other fluffy particles (highly porous and with submicronic grains), Pmax is always found to be higher in red light than in green light [10]. 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

4.1. Comparison with microwave analog results Gustafson and Kolokolova [12] have studied different compact particles and aggregates, with particular attention to the color dependence in brightness and polarization near Pmax. Their work confirms that polarization of light scattered by a fluffy particle (aggregate) decreases with increasing size of the constituent grains and with increasing porosity of the particles. With large aggregates (ten times the wavelength or more), the polarization decreases and the color in brightness and polarization is redder [13]. These results are in complete agreement with our measurements.

- 276-

High porosity for cometary dust: evidence from PROGRA 2 experiment

~

1oo

I

,

III

,

llllI

,

I

,

I I III

II

, II

,

IIl

I llI

,

,

I I I II

, II

II

I

,

,

,

I

I llIIii~iiIIll

,

,

,

I

Compact particles

II

i

80-

El fBtoron carbide

,.I.,

~.

IIIII

60

'r

,-,J 40

z~ SiIiconcarbide ........fit .

,,,." I

I I~I~*

i

i

~

i

20

o 1o0

-

I

I

,

~s

I

,,

I

I

I

,

I

I

,

i

,

I

,

I

,

n

I

,

I

I

I

,

I

,

I

,

I

I

I

n

,

,

,

I

- _ _ _..

[email protected] n ml

60-

X

.If

d

i

I

FI uffy particles

~.._~.~

80 %_..

I

,

x Basalt -fit

~

40

-o -Carbon

20

Silica + Carbon + m z x m~

0

'

'

'

I

'

'

'

20

I

40

'

'

'

I

'

'

60

'

I

80

'

'

'

100

Size of the grains (nm) Figure 2: Size dependence. 3a: Compact particles (single grain): boron carbide (very dark), silicon carbide (dark), basalt (clear brown). 3b: Fluffy particles: silica and carbon with different grains sizes, mixtures with S=silica (40 nm): ml= S + silica (16 nm), m2 = S + carbon (14 nm), m3 = S + carbon (95 nm). 4.2. Comparison

with cometary

observations

A nice agreement is found between the phase curves obtained for mixtures of fluffy particles and for those obtained for comets [ 1] with: a negative branch at phase angles smaller than 20 ~ a maximum value of polarization for a phase angle of about 100 ~ with values smaller than 50 % when the grains size is larger than 50 nm, an increase of Pmax with wavelength. To better disentangle the physical properties of cometary dust, a comparison with other diagnostics is necessary. Infrared silicate features indicate the presence of submicron grains [14], but they also could be observed with high porosity (> 95 %) aggregates [15]. Interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) collected in the stratosphere, with pyroxene, olivine and high carbon contents, could have similar composition to cometary dust. The particles have porous structures of fine-grained heterogeneous aggregates [ 16]. The best fits by a dynamical model of the in-situ measured fluxes by Giotto/DIDSY and Giotto/OPE are obtained for densities of the order of 100 kg m -3 [17,18]. Mixtures of fluffy particles have physical properties similar to those expected for cometary particles with high porosity (95 to 99)% and submicron constituent grains. The polar, metric response of such mixtures would thus plead in favor of the presence, in cometary comae, of dust particles with similar physical properties.

- 277-

E. Hadamcik et al.

REFERENCES

1. ,

,

4. 5. 6. 7.

,

9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.

A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, E. Hadamcik and J.B. Renard, Astron. Astrophys. 313 (1996) 327. E. Hadamcik, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd and J.B. Renard, Earth, Moon, Planets 78 (1997) 365. N.N. Kiselev and F.P. Velichko, Earth, Moon, Planets 78 (1997) 347. J.B. Renard, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd and A. Dollfus, Ann. Geophys. 10 (1992) 288. N. Eaton, S.M. Scarrott and P.W. Draper, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 258 (1995) 384. K. Jockers, Earth, Moon, Planets 79 (1997) 221. E. Hadamcik, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, J.B. Renard and J. Worms, in Physics, Chemistry and dynamics of Interplanetary dust (eds. B.A.S. Gustafson and M.S. Hanner), ASP Conf. Ser. 104 (1996) 391. L. Kolokolova, K. Jockers, G. Chernova and N. Kiselev, Icarus 126 (1997) 351. J.C. Worms, J.B. Renard, E. Hadamcik A.C. Levasseur-Regourd and J.F. Gayet, Icarus 142 (1999) 281. E. Hadamcik, Thesis, Universit6 Paris 6 (1999). J.C. Worms, J.B. Renard, E. Hadamcik, N. Brun-Huret and A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, Planet. Space Sci. 48 (2000) 493. B.A.S. Gustafson and L. Kolokolova, J. Geophys. Res. 104 (1999) 711. B.A.S. Gustafson, in Light scattering by nonspherical particles (eds. Mishenko, Hovenier and Travis) Academic Press (2000) 367 (2000). M.S. Hanner, this volume. J.M. Greenberg and A. Li, Space Sci. Rev. 90 (1999) 149. M.S. Hanner, Space Sci. Rev. 90 (1999) 99. A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, N. McBride, E. Hadamcik and M. Fulle, Astron. Astrophys. 348 (199) 636. M. Fulle, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, N. McBride and E. Hadamcik, Astron. J.119 (2000) 1968.

-278-