Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 117/118 (1990) 421-424 North-Holland
421
HIGH RESOLUTION COMPTON PROFILES OF LIQUID Li, Na AND Li-Na ALLOY
Fumitake ITOH, Tomoki SUGAWA*, H i r o s h i SAKURAI, Kenji SUZUKI Nobuhiko SAKAI+, M a s a h i s a ITO+, N o b u h i r o SHIOTANI# H i r o s h i KANATA$ and Masami ANDO$ I n s t i t u t e f o r M a t e r i a l s R e s e a r c h , Tohoku U n i v e r s i t y , Sendai 980, Japan + The I n s t i t u t e of P h y s i c a l and Chemical Research(RIKEN), Wako, S a i t a m a 351-01, Japan # P h y s i c s Lab., Tokyo U n i v e r s i t y of F i s h e r i e s , Konan, Minatoku, Tokyo 108, Japan $ Photon F a c t o r y , N a t i o n a l L a b o r a t o r y f o r High Energy P h y s i c s , Tsukuba, I b a r a k i 305, Japan
High r e s o l u t i o n Compton p r o f i l e s of Li, Na and LisoNaso a l l o y have been measured w i t h a momentum r e s o l u t i o n of 0.085 a . u . in b o t h s o l i d and l i q u i d s t a t e s , u s i n g 29.5 keY X - r a y s of s y n c h r o t r o n r a d i a t i o n . The h i g h momentum c o m p o n e n t s beyond the Fermi momentum and the t h e b l u r r i n g of the Fermi s u r f a c e in the l i q u i d s t a t e were c l e a r l y o b s e r v e d .
1.
Introduction
For i s o t r o p i c
Measurements of e n e r g y s p e c t r a scattered
X - r a y s or
formation about tribution
7-rays
g i v e us d i r e c t
the e l e c t r o n i c
in t h e ground s t a t e
differential
cross section
of Comptonin-
momentum d i s of m a t t e r .
The
s y s t e m s such as l i q u i d s
g a s e s where the r o t a t i o n a l tially
complete,
tained
is a s p h e r i c a l l y
averaging
the q u a n t i t y
or
is e s s e n -
experimentally
averaged J(q),
ob-
where q
i s used i n s t e a d of pz ,
f o r the Compton s c a t co
tering
can be w r i t t e n
profile
J(pz),
integral
down u s i n g t h e Compton
which is d e f i n e d
of the e l e c t r o n
J(q)
=
f
q
2 ~ pn(p)dp.
(3)
as the d o u b l e
momentum d e n s i t y
n(p).
Thus
C o n s e r v a t i o n of m o m e n t u m
and e n e r g y g i v e s us the
expression for q
d2a/dQdwr=F(og~,oJr, k~,kf, O,pz) J(pz),
(1)
q =
m e [ e o l - c o f - c o l c o r ( 1 - c o s 0 )/mc 2]
x (co 12+w,2-Xw lw ~cosO )-1/=.
(4)
with It has been one of i n t e r e s t i n g J(pz)
=
J' f n(p)dpxdpy,
(2)
s o l v e d w h e t h e r the Fermi s u r f a c e a l s and a l l o y s
where t h e e x p l i c i t is given tively tered
e x p r e s s i o n of the f u n c t i o n F
in R i b b e r f o r s ~, w t and w r a r e r e s p e c -
the e n e r g i e s of t h e i n c i d e n t X-rays,
ks and kr t h e i r
and s c a t -
momenta,
p the e l e c t r o n
0
scattering
angle,
the z a x i s
is t a k e n a l o n g the s c a t t e r i n g
the
momentum, and vector
k=kf-kl.
of a l k a l l i n e state
i s well d e f i n e d .
m e t a l s and aluminum in the l i q u i d
have been measured by u s i n g a t r a d i t i o n a l
s e t - u p which c o n s i s t s and a s o l i s rather
in l i q u i d metCompton p r o f i l e s
state
of
d e t e c t o r . 2-3
poor r e s o l u t i o n
s p a c e of t h i s
7-ray
s o u r c e of 24~Am However, due to
of 0.4 a . u .
experimental
set-up,
in momentum only limited
c o n c l u s i o n s have been o b t a i n e d .
* Present hddress:NTT, Japan
0022-3093/90/$03.50 (North-Holland)
p r o b l e m s to be
Ibaraki
Electrical
Communication L a b o r a t o r y ,
@ Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Tokai,
Naka-gun,
lbaraki
319-ii,
F. Itoh et al. / High resolution Compton profiles of liquid Li, Na and Li-Na alloy
422
Eecently, profiles
it
has been r e p o r t e d
that
Compton
can be m e a s u r e d w i t h a momentum r e s o l u -
t i o n of as h i g h as 0,085
a.u.,
X - r a y s of s y n c h r o t r o n r a d i a t i o n t i o n of a c r y s t a l
analyzer
t i v e d e t e c t o r . *-s D e t a i l e d electronic
structure
tiple
scattering
imaging p l a t e ) .
effeciency
of the
About 4x104 c o u n t s were accumu-
u s i n g 29.5 key
lated
and a c o m b i n a -
measurement took about 8 h o u r s under the o p e r a t -
and a p o s i t i o n
sensi-
i n f o r m a t i o n about t h e
at
and d e t e c t i n g
the compton peak of each sample.
ing c o n d i t i o n
Each
of 300-100 mA r i n g c u r r e n t s
4.5 T of a m a g n e t i c f i e l d
and
of the wiggler.
has been o b t a i n e d . 6-8 3. R e s u l t s and D i s c u s s i o n
In t h i s
p a p e r we r e p o r t
pton profiles alloy.
of l i q u i d
high resolution
Com-
Na m e t a l s and LiNa
Li,
D i s c u s s i o n i s f o c u s e d on the e l e c t r o n
momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n Fermi s u r f a c e
and t h e b l u r r i n g
in the l i q u i d
A Compton p r o f i l e Jr(q)
was e x t r a c t e d
profile
J(q)
from the e x p e r i m e n t a l
by s u b t r a c t i n g
core-electron
of t h e
state.
due to the v a l e n c e e l e c t r o n
profile
the t h e o r e t i c a l
by Biggs et al. 9
1 and 2 show the J r ( q )
Figures
t h u s o b t a i n e d of l i q u i d
Li and Na, r e s p e c t i v e l y . 2. E x p e r i m e n t a l The p r e s e n t
Compton s p e c t r o m e t e r c o n s i s t s
a bent-crystal bent-crystal
monochromator, a n a l y z e r and
position-sensitive descrived
a Cauchoice-type
an imaging p l a t e
detector.
elsewhere4-t
The d e t a i l s
beam l i n e of t h e Photon f a c t o r y
was 0.085
A sample of Li, into a cylindrical ¢
a.u.
steel
x 5 mm) under a p u r i f i e d
Kapton f o i l s
or s t a i n l e s s
at
~. "e.t'
momen-
O
in a vacuum steel
i
during
J(q)
subtracting
corrections
due to t h i n f o i l s
steel,
by
of Kapton or
and making e n e r g y d e p e n d e n t
(absorption
inside
t h e sample,
•
.
•
"-~.%
\, k
from the
i n d e p e n d e n t l y m e a s u r e d background
contributions stainless
were o b t a i n e d
!1
No 150°C
The sample c o n t a i n e r
u s i n g eqs. Q ) - ( 4 ) ,
•
and
the m e a s u r e m e n t s .
Compton p r o f i l e s
•
the
out at
t h a n 1.0 x 10 -6 Torr
observed energy spectra
•
Fig. 1. V a l e n c e - e l e c t r o n Compton p r o f i l e of l i q uid Li at 230 C ° , t o g e t h e r w i t h the P E ( d o t c h a i n ) and the IE ( d o t ) p r o f i l e s ( s e e the t e x t ) . The s t a t i s t i c a l e r r o r s a r e l e s s t h a n the circles.
"-I
better
•
",,¢...
0.5 q (a.u.)
150 °C,80~C and room t e m p e r a t u r e f o r Na, and
was e v a c u a t e d
i
foils
160 °C and room t e m p e r a t u r e f o r Li,
350 °C f o r Li~oNaso a l l o y .
I
put
v e s s e l ( 2 0 mm
sample i n s i d e
I
0
study.
. The m e a s u r e m e n t s were c a r r i e d
230 °C,
"%-~,~,
The
Ar a t m o s p h e r e to
and then p l a c e d
were used to hold the l i q u i d vessel
was used.
in t h i s
¢r
wiggler
Na or LiNa was c a r e f u l l y stainless
avoid o x i d i z a t i o n , chamber.
are
a n g l e was 159.5 ° . The o v e r a l l
tum r e s o l u t o n
Li 230°C
as a
The e n e r g y of the i n c i -
d e n t X - r a y s was 29.5 keV. The v e r t i c a l
scattering
of
mul-
|
0
i
\
i
0.5
q(o.u.)
Fig. 2. V a l e n c e - e l e c t r o n Compton p r o f i l e of l i q uid Na at 150 C ° , t o g e t h e r with the F E ( d o t c h a i n ) and the IE ( d o t ) p r o f i l e s ( s e e the t e x t ) . The s t a t i s t i c a l e r r o r s a r e l e s s than the circles.
F. Itoh et al. / High resolution Compton profiles of liquid Li, Na and Li-Na alloy Two t h e o r e t i c a l figures
profiles
for comparison.
free electron(F£) valence electron
a r e shown in t h e s e
One i s b a s e d on t h e
model where t h e n ( p )
f o r the
LiNG 350°C
i s g i v e n by a s t e p f u n c t i o n
n(p) = 1
423
for
0
(5)
p g
pv
p ~
pv,
•:Experiment ,:Li÷NG
G1
v "-I
"I, where pF i s t h e Fermi momentum. The o t h e r interacting Daniel
(lg)
electron
gas model b a s e d upon
and Vosko 1°. The Two p r o f i l e s
v o l u t e d w i t h the e x p e r i m e n t a l tion.
Thus t h e s t e p - w i s e
resolution
function
I t can be seen from F i g s . t h e FE nor the
q(a.u.)
funcFig. 3. V a l e n c e - e l e c t r o n Compton p r o f i l e of l i q uid L i s ~ a s o metal at 350 C ° , t o g e t h e r w i t h the F E ( d o t - c h a i n ) and t h e IE ( d o t ) p r o f i l e s ( s e e the t e x t ) . The s t a t i s t i c a l uncertaintities are less than the c i r c l e s .
i s smeared
perimental
profiles,
Fermi momentum. momentum t a i l s 'melting'
electrons states
particularly
that
is,
in t h e s t a t e s
below t h e
disordered
electron-electron count
in the
interaction
IE p r o f i l e .
represents
electron-ion
causes further
due to
of the
In o r d e r
to see t h i s
the momentum d e n s i t y
the d i f -
-(2~p)-1
F i g u r e 4 shows the n ( p ) ' s
difference
the i n t e r a c t i o n in Li
°C,
liquid
at 350°C.
I t can be seen t h a t alloy
+J~,(q)
),
is a l s o
not s i m p l y the w e i g h t e d sum of t h e p r o f i l e s constituent
liquids.
The h i g h momentum t a i l
disorder.
the Fermi s u r f a c e
shown f o r comof the a l l o y
that
is
Li at 230
the o b t a i n e d n(p)
i s much more smeared out The c h e m i c a l d i s o r d e r
in the a l l o y has s t r o n g e r
on the momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n
topological
i.e.,
of l i q u i d
Na at 160°C and l i q u i d LisoNaso a l l o y
of the l i q u i d
effects
h w e i g h t e d sum of
of the p u r e e l e m e n t s ,
(6)
dJv(p)/dp.
than t h o s e of Li and Na.
The Compton p r o f i l e
more c l e a r l y ,
and the
of the
The l a r g e r that
n(p):
F i g u r e 3 shows the Jv(q) of LisoNaso l i q u i d
0.5*(JLt(q)
situation
n(p) was deduced from Jv(q)
in the ion p o t e n t i a l s
parison.
severe smearing
by the f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n ,
and i o n s i s s t r o n g e r
a l l o y m e a s u r e d at 350 °C.
the
intro-
of the momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n .
and (2) the
than in Na.
Compton p r o f i l e s
that
is taken into ac-
the e f f e c t
in Li t h a n in Na i n d i c a t e s between t h e e l e c t r o n s
indicates
duced by a l l o y i n g
Therefore,
interaction.
observed fact
pr to t h e
and t o p o l o g i -
The e f f e c t
this
in t h e ion p o t e n t i a l s
interaction
ions.
alloying,
on the
does not change much upon
chemical d i s o r d e r
f e r e n c e between t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o f i l e Ig p r o f i l e
momentum d i s t r i b u t i o n
Since the e f -
interaction
of the
pv t h r o u g h s c a t t e r i n g
between t h e e l e c t r o n s
i s much i n t e n s e .
f e c t of the e l e c t r o n - e l e c t r o n
Fermi momentum
the e x c i t a t i o n
(1)the electron-electron
cally
the a l l o y p r o f i l e
beyond t h e
beyond t h e p~ comes from
above t h e
interaction
the ex-
The a p p e a r e n c e of the h i g h
of the s t e p - w i s e
distribution;
i and 2 t h a t
IE e x p l a i n s
0.5
are con-
accordingly.
neither
", 8
i s the
than the
The l a r g e b l u r r i n g
in l i q u i d
of
a l l o y compared to
in p u r e m e t a l s has been a l r e a d y
predicted
by Itami and S h i m o j i 11 u s i n g t h e Green f u n c t i o n
of of
method. culation.
The p r e s e n t
results
support this
cal-
F. Itoh et al./ High resolution Compton profiles of liquid Li, Na and Li-Na alloy
424
0.1-(a) Li
Li 230°C
• .'"t"". . .,.~::'., .
230°C - R'T"
O ~'-":-':::::~'I"•~ ":!:~: ----~....... ~:"'~:::....-'.' ................ . . . . . .,-..
-0.I 2
-'1
o'
0.15
•
i
T-. ,b No "1"" "'-
• " - ..-T. " 0 - - : : ' : : ~ - . . . . . . . . . '-~v 7 " . . . . . .
.~
i.
..
I
-°15-7
'
-1
I
160°C - R.T.
/
. .. -..-.I -k-),,:".-.---.----'" ~:-"1 "
".."
.
•
/ ,
L
|
o
1
2
cl(a.u.)
LiNct 350°C
Fig. 5. D i f f e r e n c e of Compton p r o f i l e A J ( q ) f o r ( a ) L i and (b)Na. The v e r t i c a l b a r s d e n o t e statistical errors.
i I
I<..~ ....
of the e l e c t r o n - i o n
I
be e s t i m a t e d
0.5
O
p(a.u.)
difference
interaction.
The f o r m e r can
from t h e IE model.
T h e r e f o r e , the
between the e x p e r i m e n t a l
the IE c u r v e is a s c r i b e d Fig. 4. Momentum d e n s i t y n(p) f o r l i q u i d Li, Na and Li5ONa50 a l l o y , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e p r e d i c t e d c u r v e by t h e FE and the I E ( s e e the t e x t ) . The vertical bars denote statistical e r r o r s . The e f f e c t of t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s o l u t i o n can be seen in the ' m e l t i n g ' of the s t e p - w i s e f u n c t i o n of the FE p r o f i l e . In o r d e r electron
to see the change of c o n d u c t i o n -
b e h a v i o r upon s o l i d - l i q u i d
sition,
the d i f f e r e n c e
of A J ( q )
phase tran-
d e f i n e d by,
(7)
A J(q)= J,,q(q)-J,ot(q),
was examined.
F i g u r e 5 shows the d i f f e r e n c e
c u r v e s of Li and Na, which i s drawn in both positive
and n e g a t i v e momentum s p a c e s to show
symmetrical features. A J(q)
is c o n s i s t e n t
The p r e s e n t
experimental
w i t h the p r e v i o u s
7-ray
e x p e r i m e n t s . 8-t The A J ( q ) difference
contains
in the e f f e c t
electron
interaction
electron
density
i n f o r m a t i o n about
the
of the e l e c t r o n -
due to the change in the
c a u s e d by the volume change
upon m e l t i n g , and the d i f f e r n c e
in the e f f e c t
teraction
titative
elaboration
and
to t h e e l e c t r o n - i o n
acompanied by the m e l t i n g .
theoretical
A J(q)
is r e q u i r e d
in-
Further to get qan-
agreement.
1. R. R i b b e r f o r s , Phys. Rev. B 12(1975)3136. 2. F. I t o h , T. Honda and K. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 47(1979)122. 3. T. Honda, F. I t o h and g. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soe. Jpn. 47(1979)133. 4. N. S h i o t a n i , N. Sakai, F. I t o h , M. S a k u r a i , H. Kawata, V. Amemiya and M. Ando, Nucl. l n s t r u m . Methods A275(1989)447. 5. F. I t o h , M. S a k u r a i , T. Sugawa, K. Suzuki, N. Sakai, M. I t o , O. Mao, N. S h i o t a n i , Y. Tanaka, Y. S a k u r a i , S. Nanao, H. Kawata, Y. Amemiya and M. Ando, Rev. Sci. l n s t r u m . 60(1989)2402. 6. N. S h i o t a n i , N. S a k a i , M. l t o , O. Mao, F. I t o h , H. Kawata, Y. Amemiya and M. Ando, J . P h y s . : C o n d e n s . M a t t e r I(1989)SA27. 7. F. I t o h , M. S a k u r a i , T. Sugawa, K. Suzuki, N. Sakai, N. S h i o t a n i , O. Mao, M. l t o , H. Kawata, Y. Amemiya and M. Ando, P o r t u g a l P h y s i c a in press 8. N. Sakai, N. S h i o t a n i . F. I t o h , O. Mao, M. I t o , H. Kawata, Y. Amemiya and M. Ando, J . P h y s . Soc. Jpn. in p r e s s 9. F. Biggs, L.B. Mendelsohn and J.B. Mann, At. Data Nucl. Data T a b l e s 16(1975)201. 10. E. Daniel and S. Yosko, Phys. Rev. 120(1960) 2041. I i . T. ltami and M. S h i m o j i , P h i l . Mag. 25(1972)229.