DDTVol. 5, No. 12 (Suppl.), 2000
(
HTS supplement
I editorial
bring
ughput screening the crops
Screening
gement of ignorance. Such a
concurrent recording of several detection modes at
provocative statemen
ot amuse our community and, in
the same time, from the same well, increases the
fact, an incredible o~
knowledge does go into each
is the ac
resolution of information obtained and verifies it by
,ctural point of view, screening is
immediately cross-checking the results 1. To utilize the predictive power of such information, the appropriate interpretation has to be in
where serendipi~ meets
place. This comprises a successful combination of statistics, visualization, databases and models - all of
T i m m Jessen EVOTEC BioSystems Schnackenburgallee 114 2 2 5 2 5 Hamburg, Germany tel: + 4 9 40 56081 0 fax: + 4 9 40 56081 222 e-mail: timm.jessen@ evotec.de
V Most of the screens performed in industry involve
which are heavily developed in academia and indus-
an encounter between a known target molecule and
try. Again, the driving force here is efficiency be-
a series of chemical compounds in order to identify
cause, despite the ever-increasing throughput num-
a hit, which is nothing more than a structural match.
bers, the most tin'm- and cost-effective way to create
In a screen, the plethora of molecular interactions is
a drug is immediate and successful prediction based
tested simultaneously, but only the net result is usu-
on solid information.
ally observed by the scientist. Dynamic events, sep-
So, will that determine the fate of screening? Just
aration into ionic and non-ionic interactions and in-
the opposite. We have not even completely arrived at
direct effects of the respective molecular environment
the most simplistic level of predicting the molecular
remain camouflaged under a sole signal identified by
interactions between a structurally known protein
the reader. Hence, in the past, the predictive power
and a compound, although good progress has been
of screens has been limited.
made in ensuring short turn-around times in com-
However, improvements are on the way: the pro-
p o u n d synthesis and screening. Already, however, the
tein structure database is growing exponentially*; the
next level of complexity - a structurally unknown
resolution of chemical space is improving; a variety
target - leaves us with little option but screening to
of devices detecting the different nature of molecular
generate knowledge. Not to speak of cellular target
interactions is appearing, and the number of success
screens, reporter assays, biological specificity issues
stories is increasing. Often, Mother Nature has been
or absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion
the best guide: most of the screening - evolution -
(ADME) tests like the blood-brain-barrier passage. It
had already been done before the design of new
is the assay design, in combination with the respective
insulins, the development of peptidic antagonists stem-
screening platform, where information is accumu-
ming from the natural ligand, or the exploitation of
lated through a thoughtful combination of molecular
RGD motifs in drug discovery. Iterative crystallization
biology, protein chemistry, library design and interpre-
of target/compound pairs, meanwhile, has also achieved
tation of the obtained data.
several 'home runs' (e.g. HIV protease, interleukin-l-~-
HTS is not challenged by rational drug design -
converting enzyme, carboanhydrase), thereby in-
the former is feeding the latter, whereas the latter is
creasing the level of independence from physiological
reshaping and continuously rejuvenating the former.
interactions. Series of focussed chemical libraries
Good et d. describe a good example of this approach
used in high-throughput screening (HTS) already
in this supplement. The harvest is on, and HTS is
balance the 'millions-of-compounds' approach w h e n
reaping the crops.
it comes to a structurally well known target class or hit optimization. Molecular interactions are now increasingly observed on a molecular level and on- and off-rates are becoming part of primary screens. The
Reference 1 Haupts, U. et d. (2000) Macroscopic versus microscopic fluorescence techniques in (u]tra)-highthroughput screening. DrugDiscov.Today 5 (Suppl. High-
* See the latest version of the PDB database, Stony Brooks.
throughputScreening), 3-9
1359-6446/00/$ - see front matter @2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: $1471-1931 (00)00063-X
$49