Journal Pre-proofs Historical human activities accelerated climate-driven desertification in China’s Mu Us Desert Di Zhang, Hui Deng PII: DOI: Reference:
S0048-9697(19)34762-X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134771 STOTEN 134771
To appear in:
Science of the Total Environment
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
13 February 2019 28 August 2019 29 September 2019
Please cite this article as: D. Zhang, H. Deng, Historical human activities accelerated climate-driven desertification in China’s Mu Us Desert, Science of the Total Environment (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2019.134771
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1
Historical human activities accelerated climate-driven desertification in
2
China’s Mu Us Desert
3
Di Zhang *, Hui Deng **
4
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5
* Corresponding author.
6
** Corresponding author.
7
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (D. Zhang),
[email protected] (H. Deng).
8 9
Abstract
10
China’s Mu Us Desert, located in an energy-rich strategic base of the northwestern Loess
11
Plateau, has acted as a crucial agro-pastoral transition zone for thousands of years. However,
12
the area experienced notable climate and environmental change from 221 BC to AD 907
13
(1128 years), which may have profoundly affected its landscape evolution up to modern times.
14
To explore this process and associated driving mechanisms, we conducted a comprehensive
15
study based on a dataset of 882 human archaeological sites (HASs), historical documents,
16
and related environmental data of the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA). We
17
found that the MUDISA experienced large-scale immigration on several occasions, as well as
18
an agricultural boom (790 HASs), during the Qin and Han dynasties (221 BC–AD 220). This
19
coincided with an ecologically favorable environment and may have potentially disturbed the
20
desert’s eco-environmental equilibrium. Coinciding with the deteriorating natural conditions,
21
the MUDISA was dominated by animal husbandry with the HAS numbers declining sharply
22
and scattering in the desert during the era of disunity (AD 220–581, 33 HASs) and during the 1
23
Historical human activities accelerated climate-driven desertification in
24
China’s Mu Us Desert
25
Di Zhang *, Hui Deng **
26
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
27
* Corresponding author.
28
** Corresponding author.
29
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (D. Zhang),
[email protected] (H. Deng).
30 31
Abstract
32
China’s Mu Us Desert, located in an energy-rich strategic base of the northwestern Loess
33
Plateau, has acted as a crucial agro-pastoral transition zone for thousands of years. However,
34
the area experienced notable climate and environmental change from 221 BC to AD 907
35
(1128 years), which may have profoundly affected its landscape evolution up to modern times.
36
To explore this process and associated driving mechanisms, we conducted a comprehensive
37
study based on a dataset of 882 human archaeological sites (HASs), historical documents,
38
and related environmental data of the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA). We
39
found that the MUDISA experienced large-scale immigration on several occasions, as well as
40
an agricultural boom (790 HASs), during the Qin and Han dynasties (221 BC–AD 220). This
41
coincided with an ecologically favorable environment and may have potentially disturbed the
42
desert’s eco-environmental equilibrium. Coinciding with the deteriorating natural conditions,
43
the MUDISA was dominated by animal husbandry with the HAS numbers declining sharply
44
and scattering in the desert during the era of disunity (AD 220–581, 33 HASs) and during the 2
45
Sui and Tang dynasties (AD 581–907, 59 HASs). Coupled with the dry climate and fragile
46
geographical environment, both the increasingly large-scale human population and the
47
presence of extensive livestock may have significantly accelerated the climate-driven
48
desertification process from AD 220 to AD 907. This study highlights the long-term
49
human–nature relationship and their combined impact on historical desertification in the Mu
50
Us Desert, and may shed new light on historical environmental change in arid and/or
51
semi-arid areas in northwest China and globally.
52 53
Keywords: Mu Us Desert; From 221 BC to AD 907; Comprehensive study; Human activities;
54
Human–nature relationship; Historical desertification
55 56
1. Introduction
57
China’s Mu Us Desert is located at the northwest edge of the East Asian monsoon region and
58
the junction of arid and semi-arid areas of the Eurasian continent (Liu, 2009; Fig. 1). This
59
area is a crucial agro-pastoral transition zone at the middle reaches of the Yellow River, with
60
pronounced fluctuations in population and land use types during its history (Wang, 2006).
61
Contrary to its importance and persistent status in China’s energy industry, the desert has
62
been ecologically fragile and highly sensitive to climatic change since ancient times (Dong et
63
al., 1989; Li et al., 2000; Li et al., 2005; Sun, 2000). It is therefore an ideal natural laboratory
64
for exploring global climate change, human activity, and environmental variation
65
relationships throughout history.
66 3
67
The desert’s situation from 221 BC to AD 907 deserves close attention because it presents a
68
critical link between the past and the present. Compared with the previous historical period,
69
the ability of the ancient Chinese people to transform the surface landscape during this period
70
was greatly enhanced by remarkable improvements in agricultural production (e.g., two-cattle
71
plowing and iron tools) and efficiency of social organization (e.g., landlord–tenant dynamics
72
and large-scale herding and/or nomadic tribes). The environmental changes and the
73
human–land relationship during this early feudal society may have profoundly affected the
74
evolution of the desert landscape up to modern times.
75 76
Concerning this period, some researchers hold that the origin and evolution of the desert were
77
mainly driven by climatic fluctuations (Dong et al., 1989; Wang et al., 2005). The region
78
experienced climate-driven desertification in the late Tang Dynasty (Cui and Chang, 2013;
79
Huang et al., 2009). Other researchers have challenged this view. For example, Sun et al.
80
(2000), using evidence from sedimentary profiles, ancient city distribution, and historical
81
records, found that unreasonable human activities, especially cultivation, had greatly
82
accelerated sand reworking of the desert during the past 2300 years. Deng et al. (2001), using
83
aerial remote sensing images and historical documents, pointed out that local people’s
84
overuse of land resources played a leading role in ecological environmental deterioration
85
around the ancient Tongwan City (within the desert, Fig. 1B) from the beginning of the 5th
86
century to the late 10th century. The desertification in the Tang Dynasty may therefore be
87
closely related to intensified human activity (Guo et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019).
88 4
89
The holistic picture of the desert’s environmental change and its driving forces during this
90
period still remains vague. Key to unraveling these controversial questions is the construction
91
of a human–nature-based model integrating quantitative and qualitative methods and data.
92
Here, we collected and analyzed 882 human archaeological sites (HASs) in the Mu Us Desert
93
and its surrounding area (MUDISA) for the historical period between 221 BC and AD 907 as
94
provided by the Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics, the Third National Cultural Relic Survey,
95
and relevant journal articles. Using these data, combined with related historical records,
96
stratigraphic evidence, historical rivers in the eastern MUDISA, and a map of the desert’s
97
modern landscape, we established a database of human occupation and eco-environment in
98
the MUDISA (see the section “Materials and methods” for the details).
99 100
Using this database, we explored the human–nature relationship and environmental changes
101
in the desert over this continuous period and investigated potential driving forces. Evidence
102
from the HASs, historical records, socio-economic characteristics, and quaternary geology
103
data (Jiang et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2011; Su et al., 2018; H. Zhao et al., 2016) produced
104
coherent scenarios for the three occupation phases in this 1128-year period: (a) Qin and Han
105
dynasties (221 BC–AD 220), (b) era of disunity (AD 220–581), and (c) Sui and Tang
106
dynasties (AD 581–907).
107
5
108 109
Fig. 1. The Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA) including historical sites,
110
stratigraphic profile sites, and historical rivers mentioned in the text. (A) The MUDISA’s
111
location on Google Map images of China. The dashed green line indicates the approximate
112
line of modern 400 mm isoprecipitation. (B) Red dots with numbers indicate historical sites:
113
1, Yangqiaopan; 2, Tongwan/Xiazhou City; 3–7, five cities of the Liuhuzhou. Green dots with
114
numbers indicate stratigraphic profile sites: 1, Bayanchagan (Fig. 1A); 2, Dishaogouwan
115
(DSGW); 3, Jinjie. Details of the reconstruction of historical rivers are in “Materials and
116
methods”. m.a.s.l., meters above sea level.
117 118
2. Materials and methods
119
2.1. Study area
120
The Mu Us Desert belongs to the transitional zone of arid and semi-arid areas in northern
121
China. Located in the Hetao area bounded by the Yellow River to the west, north and east, the
122
desert consists of parts of 11 counties/cities, including the northern Yulin City, southern 6
123
Ordos City, and eastern Wuzhong City, with the total area of about 39,000 km2 (Fig. 1). The
124
regional mean annual temperature and hours of sunshine are ~8°C and ~2900 h, respectively;
125
its mean annual precipitation gradually ranges from ~450 mm/year in the southeast to < 200
126
mm/year in the northwest. The surface landscapes within the desert mainly include shifting
127
dunes, fixed/semi-fixed dunes, desert steppes and shrubs, and surface water. Based on spatial
128
connection and regional comparison, this study considers some aspects of the Mu Us Desert
129
and its surrounding area (MUDISA). The area of the MUDISA is ~95,000 km2—2.4 times
130
larger than that of the Mu Us Desert. This inclusion is aimed at making this desert research
131
more scientific and reliable.
132 133
It is worth noting that the desert is significantly different from the surrounding loess area in
134
terms of geological conditions and surface environment. At least since the historical period,
135
the Mu Us Desert has existed with sandy strata (Dong et al., 1989; Sun, 2000; Xu et al., 2015;
136
Zhou et al., 2009). The degree and range of its dunes’ fixation and activation in different
137
historical periods mainly have depended on the corresponding climatic conditions (Dong et
138
al., 1989; Li et al., 2000; Li et al., 2005; Li et al., 2019; Liu and Lai 2012) and/or human
139
activities (Guo et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Sun, 2000; Xiao et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2002).
140
The desert’s eco-environment has thus always been more fragile and unstable than that of the
141
loess area surrounding it. These circumstances have formed the geographical basis for
142
potential regional desertification of the Mu Us Desert historically.
143 144
2.2. Human archaeological sites 7
145
Data on HASs in this study were drawn from the Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics (Bureau of
146
National Cultural Relics, 1998, 2003, 2010), the Third National Cultural Relic Survey
147
(Leading group of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region for the Third National Cultural
148
Relics Survey, 2011; Leading group of Yanchi County for the Third National Cultural Relics
149
Survey [Unpublished internal materials]; Ordos Municipal Bureau of Culture and Leading
150
group of the Ordos for the Third National Cultural Relics Survey [Unpublished internal
151
materials]; Shaanxi Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau, 2012), and other relevant publications
152
(Guo, 1995; Kou et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015; Qiao et al., 2011; Wang et al.,
153
2011; Yin et al., 2009). Sites containing iron tools during the Qin and Han dynasties
154
mentioned in the text also come from this database. The 882 HASs are composed of three
155
types: general human settlements (53.74%), ancient cities (7.03%), and burial areas
156
(39.23%).
157 158
Based on ArcGIS 10.0 spatial analysis, the HAS Point Density maps of different periods were
159
created after choosing the Neighborhood Method (Circle, Radius = 15 km) and the
160
Classification Method (Natural Breaks, Jenks). These Point Density maps provide spatial
161
information on the Minimum Enclosing Rectangles of relevant HASs before boundary
162
clipping. In this study, the spatial distribution of the HASs and Point Density is an important
163
way to characterize corresponding “human occupation,” not to represent spatial distribution
164
of the historical population or human activity intensity. According to historical geography
165
research (Deng et al., 2001, 2003) and the relevant historical documents (Ban, 2002; Fan,
166
2003; Liu, 2002; Sima, 1995; Song, 2003; Wei, 2002; Wei, 2003), human activities were not 8
167
limited to the vicinity of the HASs, and desert areas that do not contain HASs were not
168
necessarily lacking in historical human activities. It is often quite difficult for animal
169
husbandry activities, for example, to produce HASs, and such activities were common during
170
the era of disunity and the Sui and Tang dynasties.
171 172
2.3. Historical river reconstruction
173
Rivers located on the eastern MUDISA during this study period (Fig. 1B) were reconstructed
174
on the basis of the historical records from the Shuijing Zhu (Notes on the Book of Waterways;
175
Li, 2009), Digital Elevation Model (DEM) extraction of ancient river channels, remote
176
sensing images, and field surveys. The Shuijing Zhu, written in the late Northern Wei
177
Dynasty (AD 386–534), describes the rivers’ sequence or order, geographical location, and
178
direction of flow. This book confirms that rivers of Kuye, Tuwei, and Wuding—the three
179
large tributaries of the Yellow River in the eastern MUDISA—already existed there during
180
the study period. The book also records several relatively large tributaries for each of these
181
three rivers, and their approximate spatial distribution was determined. In addition, two other
182
small rivers are also recorded between the Kuye River and the Tuwei River and between the
183
Tuwei River and the Wuding River, respectively (Fig. 1). Combining these records with
184
modern remote sensing images and field investigations, we mapped the general distribution
185
of these rivers.
186 187
Based on ArcGIS 10.0 software and DEM data, we applied the “surface runoff model” to
188
extract a vector map of the river channels in the eastern MUDISA (Tang and Yang, 2012). In 9
189
this model, we first obtained the water flow direction for each DEM grid on the basis of the
190
maximum slope gradient method of non-depression DEM. Using the grid data with water
191
flow direction, we calculated the total grid number accumulated in the water flow direction
192
for each grid; this is called the “flow accumulation”. Assuming that each grid carries one unit
193
of flow water, the flow accumulation represents the total water flow for each grid. When the
194
grid flow accumulation reaches a certain value, surface water flow will form and the potential
195
water flow paths consist of all of the grids whose flow accumulation exceeds the certain
196
value threshold. The river network is composed of all of the water flow paths.
197 198
ArcGIS 10.0 software provides a DEM data processing module called Hydrology in the
199
Spatial Analyst Tools. This module was successfully applied to extract the vector map of the
200
river channels. After the ArcGIS operation steps for depression-DEM filling, flow direction
201
calculation, flow accumulation calculation, river grid extraction, river vector formation, and
202
river vector post-processing (Tang and Yang, 2012), we obtained the river network map.
203
According to this vector map, the general map of the recorded rivers was adjusted, and we
204
have treated these adjusted rivers as the historical rivers in our study (Hu, 2015). The modern
205
remote sensing images come from Google Earth data. The DEM data are from SRTM DEM
206
(90 m resolution) and ASTER GDEMV2 DEM (30 m resolution); these data were provided
207
by the Geospatial Data Cloud site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy
208
of Sciences (http://www.gscloud.cn).
209 210
2.4. Map of modern landscapes in the Mu Us Desert 10
211
The modern landscape map of the Mu Us Desert was made on the basis of Landsat ETM+
212
remote sensing images (July to September 2000). These data were provided by the Geospatial
213
Data Cloud site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences
214
(http://www.gscloud.cn). After extensive data trials and comparisons/contrasts in ENVI 5.1,
215
we established the optimal image band combination of R7-G4-B1, which well distinguishes
216
different types of the desert’s major landscape features. Based on these, we completed the
217
supervised classification of these images combining a great deal of data pre- and post-
218
processing. We finally obtained the high-quality landscape map consisting of the six types:
219
water, vegetation, shifting dune, fixed or semi-fixed dune, saline-alkali land, and sandy soil
220
or loess. The desert boundary is defined according to the Natural conditions and their
221
improvement and Utilization in the Mu Us Desert (Department of Geography in Peking
222
University et al., 1983).
223 224
2.5. Historical records, historical population reconstruction
225
Historical records containing important information on the relevant eco-environment and/or
226
human activities mentioned in this study are listed in Texts S1–S26 in the Supplementary
227
Information (SI). Based on relevant available historical documents (Ban, 2002; Fan, 2003;
228
Liu, 2002; Sima, 1995; Song, 2003; Wei, 2002; Wei, 2003) and the Historical Atlas of China
229
(Tan, 1982), we reconstructed the historical populations of six periods for the Mu Us Desert,
230
as well as for the ancient Tongwan City and its surrounding area. Due to the lack of exact
231
statistical years for each of the population data, we have limited the historical time sections to
232
periods as short as possible on the basis of relevant historical materials. 11
233 234
For historical population documents using people as the unit, we used these population data
235
directly. For historical population documents that used households as the unit, we converted
236
the household-based population data using the common formula that one household equals
237
five people; this formula has frequently been used to convert household-based to
238
person-based historical demographic data in Chinese history and historical geography (Deng
239
et al., 2001). The relevant military populations have already been included in the
240
demographic data. More details about the specific historical documents and population
241
calculations can be seen in the SI. Generally speaking, the desert’s population was mainly
242
concentrated in ancient cities and their surrounding areas.
243 244
3. Results and discussion
245
3.1. Agricultural boom during the Qin and Han dynasties (221 BC–AD 220)
246
During the Qin and Han dynasties, humans dwelt in nearly the entire MUDISA (Fig. 2A).
247
There were 790 HASs with a Minimum Enclosing Rectangle of 136, 898 km2; both of the
248
two numbers are the maximum values for all three periods (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The
249
proportion of high slope (>12°) HASs is as high as 13.9% (Table S1). The HAS high-density
250
areas (>225 per ha) are mainly distributed in the regions of southern hilly ravine and eastern
251
river valley plain (Fig. 2A and D). Within the Mu Us Desert, compared with the other two
252
periods, there are numerous HASs (231 sites) and high-density areas (>113 per ha), mainly
253
distributed in the eastern and southern edges, although their percentage in the total 790 HASs
254
is not high (29.2%, Fig. 2A and D, Tables 1 and 2). Most of these sites tended to be 12
255
distributed near present-day fertile zones, with 102 sites (44.2%) on modern vegetation areas
256
(Fig. 3A, Tables S2 and S3).
257
258 259
Fig. 2. Human archaeological sites (HASs) and HAS Point Density maps of three historical
260
periods in the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA). In HAS maps of the Qin
261
and Han dynasties (221 BC–AD 220) (A), the era of disunity (AD 220–581) (B), and the Sui
262
and Tang dynasties (AD 581–907) (C), HASs indicating major human occupation areas
263
consist of historical general settlement sites (GSSs), city sites (CSs), and burial area sites
264
(BASs). HAS Minimum Enclosing Rectangles from (D) to (F) are 136,898, 96,348, and
265
75,690 km2, respectively. m.a.s.l., meters above sea level. (D), (E), and (F) are the Point
266
Density maps of the three periods, respectively. The Point Density unit in the legends is “sites 13
267
per 10,000 km2” (see “Materials and methods” for the method details of these Point Density
268
maps).
269 270
Table 1
271
Statistics for human archaeological sites (three types) in three historical periods in the Mu Us
272
Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA), as well as in the Mu Us Desert. Archaeological site MUDISA General settlement site City site Burial area site Total (N)
Qin and Han n1 n1/N (%) 454 57.5 41 5.2 295 37.3 790 100
era of disunity n2 n2/N (%) 9 27.3 5 15.1 19 57.6 33 100
Sui and Tang n3 n3/N (%) 11 18.7 16 27.1 32 54.2 59 100
Mu Us Desert General settlement site City site Burial area site Total (N)
n1 139 11 81 231
n2 5 2 10 17
n3 3 9 20 32
n1/N (%) 60.2 4.7 35.1 100
n2/N (%) 29.4 11.8 58.8 100
n3/N (%) 9.4 28.1 62.5 100
273 274
Table 2
275
Nearest distance statistics between human archaeological sites for three historical periods in
276
the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA), and in the Mu Us Desert. Distance
277
unit: km; SD: standard deviation. Historical period Qin and Han era of disunity Sui and Tang
N 790 33 59
MUDISA Range Mean±SD 0.2–33.5 3.9±4.1 0.7–64.2 18.6±19.9 0.5–65.0 13.2±12.3
278
14
n 231 17 32
Mu Us Desert n/N (%) Range 29.2 0.3–36.8 51.5 0.7–53.7 54.2 0.5–77.7
Mean±SD 4.7±5.1 9.8±14.2 16.6±18.8
279 280
Fig. 3. Human archaeological sites (HASs) during three historical periods on a modern
281
landscape map of the Mu Us Desert. In the HAS maps of the Qin and Han dynasties (221
282
BC–AD 220) (A), the era of disunity (AD 220–581) (B), and the Sui and Tang dynasties (AD 15
283
581–907) (C), HASs indicating major human occupation areas consist of historical general
284
settlement sites (GSSs), city sites (CSs), and burial area sites (BASs). Details concerning the
285
map of the desert’s modern landscape can be found in “Materials and methods” (see Tables
286
S2 and S3 for the spatial relationship between the HASs and different landscape types).
287 288
This boom situation was directly linked to the robust military control and large-scale
289
immigration in this area implemented by centralized governments. The First Emperor of Qin
290
sent General Meng Tian leading an army of 300,000 people to defeat nomadic tribes and
291
reclaim vast areas of land in the Hetao area (including the MUDISA, Texts S1 and S2).
292
Afterward, Qinzhidao—the first ancient “highway” in human history—was built, passing
293
south-to-north through the desert (Text S3; Tan, 1982). Based on historical records (Texts
294
S4–S7), large-scale populations were migrated into the MUDISA and its adjacent regions
295
from southern farming areas on several occasions. Newcomers totaled over 700,000 in 120
296
BC, for example (Text S5). Hundreds of thousands of border guards joined the ranks of
297
agricultural reclamation (Text S7). The MUDISA’s farming population increased sharply,
298
coinciding with the large number of HASs in this period. The total population of the four
299
counties of Sheyan, Baitu, Qiuci, and Gaowang within the desert was as high as about
300
105,504 in the late Western Han Dynasty (Fig. 4), which is the highest value during the six
301
historical periods considered, although the population once dropped significantly to less than
302
10,000 in the late Eastern Han Dynasty due to social unrest and farmer withdrawal.
303
16
304 305
Fig. 4. Historical populations of different historical periods for the Mu Us Desert, as well as
306
for the ancient Tongwan City and its surrounding area. The unit of numbers on the ordinate is
307
“1,000 people”. P1–P6 represent the periods AD 1–5, AD 136–141, AD 391–427, AD
308
533–536, AD 605–618, and AD 742–756, respectively. The six historical time sections are in
309
the late Western Han Dynasty (202 BC–AD 8), the late Eastern Han Dynasty (AD 25–220),
310
the late Sixteen Kingdoms period (AD 304–439), the late Northern Dynasties (AD 386–581),
311
the Sui Dynasty (AD 581–618), and the middle of the Tang Dynasty (AD 618–907),
312
respectively. Details of the historical population reconstruction can be found in “Materials
313
and methods” and Supplementary Information (SI).
314 315
Meanwhile, agricultural production techniques and tools were greatly improved compared
316
with prehistoric times. Tomb murals from the Eastern Han Dynasty (AD 25–220) within the
317
Mu Us Desert vividly reproduce scenes of agricultural hoeing and two-cattle plowing (Fig. 5).
318
This suggests that farmers in this area attached great importance to field management and
319
mastered the then-advanced two-cattle plowing technique. Canal irrigation was also 17
320
introduced here (Texts S8 and S9). Notably, throughout the study area, iron tools (including
321
iron farm tools, Fig. 6) contributed significantly to the efficiency and intensity of land use.
322
323 324
Fig. 5. Tomb murals of farming activity from the Eastern Han Dynasty (AD 25–220) within
325
the Mu Us Desert. Unearthed from the Yangqiaopan site in Jingbian County, northern
326
Shaanxi Province (Yin et al., 2009; see Fig. 1 for its location), (A) vividly reproduces the
327
scene of agricultural hoeing, and (B) depicts a two-cattle plowing scene, suggesting that this
328
farming technology was introduced there no later than the Eastern Han Dynasty.
329
18
330 331
Fig. 6. Spatial distribution of the iron sites (ISs, unrecognizable type) and iron farm tool sites
332
(IFTSs) from the Han Dynasty (202 BC–AD 220) in the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding
333
area (MUDISA). These sites come from the same database as the human archaeological sites
334
(HASs) in “Materials and methods.” The considerable number of the ISs (31 sites) and IFTSs
335
(11 sites) to some extent indicates the scope and intensity of agricultural activities at that time.
336
m.a.s.l., meters above sea level.
337 338
All of the above, combined with the innovative landlord ownership of the land, greatly
339
promoted the development of agriculture in the region. The Hetao area became a place where
340
“fertile land and surplus grains are ubiquitous” (Text S9; Wang et al., 2011). The farming
341
culture brought here by these immigrants from the Central Plains was prevalent. Some animal
342
husbandry and hunting still existed (Text S9; Lv and Zhang, 2004; Shaanxi Provincial
343
Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics Management Committee of Yulin City, 2001),
344
complementing the dominant agricultural economy. 19
345 346
This farming prosperity in the populous MUDISA indicated favorable climatic and
347
eco-environmental conditions there during this period (Fig. 7). Similarly, the desert’s
348
ecological situation was probably much better than it is today, and there was a relative
349
abundance of water sources in perennial rivers and lakes, especially in the east and south
350
fringes (Texts S2 and S9–S11). While a certain proportion of scattered bare areas (Guo et al.,
351
2018; Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics Management
352
Committee of Yulin City, 2001), the dunes of this period were generally fixed within the
353
desert. High-intensity agricultural activities may, however, have exceeded the local ecological
354
carrying capacity (Text S10; Sun, 2000; Xiao et al., 2002). After all, the desert’s strata during
355
the historical period were still sandy and ecologically fragile as they were inherited from
356
previous geological periods (Dong et al., 1989; Xu et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2009); the area
357
was massively reclaimed as cultivated land. The potential human impact on the desert’s
358
eco-environment is discussed below.
359
360 20
361
Fig. 7. Climatic records and stratigraphic profiles from two sites in the Mu Us Desert. (A)
362
Based on climate reconstruction of the Bayanchagan Lake sediment core, curves a and b
363
represent mean annual precipitation (Pann) and temperature (Tann), respectively (Jiang et al.,
364
2010). H1–H3 represent the Qin and Han dynasties (221 BC–AD 220), the era of disunity
365
(AD 220–581), and the Sui and Tang dynasties (AD 581–907), respectively. (B) Stratigraphic
366
profile with the optical stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating at the Dishaogouwan (DSGW)
367
site (H. Zhao et al., 2016). (C) Stratigraphic profile with the OSL dating at the Jinjie site (Ma
368
et al., 2011). See Fig. 1 for locations of the three sites. Climatic change trends of (A) can
369
largely be applicable to the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA), since the two
370
places are not far from each other and located on the same marginal zone of the East Asian
371
Monsoon region.
372 373
3.2. Regional desertification and the rise of animal husbandry during the era of disunity (AD
374
220–581)
375
Good times do not last forever. The number of HASs in the MUDISA during the era of
376
disunity decreased sharply to the lowest point (33 sites) for all three periods. Minimum
377
Enclosing Rectangle of these HASs was reduced by 30% in area and shrank towards the
378
middle compared with the previous period (Fig. 2 and Table 1). Compared with the Qin and
379
Han dynasties, both the mean values of HAS nearest distances in the MUDISA and in the
380
desert increased to 18.6 km and 9.8 km, respectively (Table 2). The desert’s 17 HASs
381
accounted for ~51.5% of the 33 total sites (Table 1) and were distributed closer to the rivers
382
(Fig. 2E and Table 3). The only relative high-density HAS area (>56 per ha) was near the 21
383
ancient Tongwan City along the Wuding River (Fig. 1B and E). The ancient Tongwan City, a
384
famous Xiongnu capital city site, was founded in the early 5th century AD by the Xiongnu
385
leader Helian Bobo. Consistent with the climatic shift towards dry and cold (Fig. 7A), this
386
HAS exodus implied deteriorating natural conditions after the Han Dynasty (Liu and Lai,
387
2012). Although lower than during the late Western Han Dynasty, the desert’s populations
388
reached ~45,000 and ~56,000 for the late Sixteen Kingdoms period and the late Northern
389
Dynasties, respectively. For the latter two periods, populations in the ancient Tongwan City
390
and its surrounding area were ~40,000 (88.9% of the 45,000) and ~28,000 (50% of the
391
56,000), respectively (Fig. 4). Obviously, the average population of the desert’s settlements
392
(consisting of city and general settlement sites) during this period was generally much higher
393
than during the Qin and Han dynasties.
394 395
Table 3
396
Nearest distance statistics for human archaeological sites (HASs) during three historical
397
periods in the eastern valley plain (EVP) and the Mu Us Desert to the eastern historical rivers
398
in the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA). Distance unit: km; the EVP
399
consists of the counties of Shenmu, Yulin, Hengshan, and Jiaxian (northern part, Fig. 1B); SD:
400
standard deviation; n1, n2, and n3 represent the numbers of relevant HASs with the nearest
401
distances of no more than 1 km, 5 km, and 10 km to the rivers, respectively. Region and period Qin and Han EVP era of disunity Sui and Tang Mu Us Qin and Han Desert era of disunity
N 238 9 16 231 17
Range <0.1–23.8 0.1–22.5 0.1–22.5 <0.1–83.8 0.3–30.7
Mean±SD 5.5±5.1 7.0±8.1 5.1±6.4 19.6±22.8 9.9±10.2 22
n1/N (%) 22.3 44.4 31.3 10.8 23.5
n2/N (%) 54.2 55.6 68.8 33.8 41.2
n3/N (%) 83.6 66.7 81.3 54.5 70.6
Sui and Tang
32
0.2–80.4
17.9±23.3
12.5
34.4
56.3
402 403
During this period, historical documents suggest that the study area experienced a
404
desertification process of sand dune activation. On the western and northern parts of the
405
ancient Tongwan City, there were ubiquitous areas of sandy land, large sand piles, and hills of
406
sand (Texts S12 and S13). The west and north of the Mu Us Desert had deep sand, roads
407
mostly covered by deep sand, and shifting dunes (Text S14). This desertification process was
408
also recorded in stratigraphic profiles from the desert’s eastern river valley plain (Fig. 7B and
409
C). Although some ecologically favored refuges were indicated by the HASs (Fig. 3B) and
410
recorded in the Shuijing Zhu (Text S13), the desert may have suffered the consequences of
411
human disturbance of the ecological equilibrium during the Qin and Han dynasties (Text S10;
412
S.H. Li et al., 2012; Sun, 2000). Dunes and quicksand originated primarily from the local
413
sandy strata (Sun, 2000; Xu et al., 2015), correlating with the weak East Asian monsoon (Nie
414
et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2016; S. Zhao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2009). Compounding the
415
effects of the sandy strata and dry climate (Fig. 7A), the desert’s considerable population,
416
especially near the city sites, may have contributed to this desertification process.
417 418
Why did Helian Bobo establish his capital at the ancient Tongwan City within the desert? The
419
then relatively attractive eco-environment in the region (Texts S15 and S16; Deng et al., 2001,
420
2003; Hou, 1973) was limited to a small area that did not represent the whole situation of the
421
desert. Indeed, the city’s location was more a matter of a vital political and military strategy
422
to resist the powerful enemy in the north called Beiwei (Wang and Dong, 2001). The ancient
423
Tongwan City maintained its status as a capital for only 19 years: from AD 413, at the 23
424
beginning of its construction, to AD 431, when Helianxia (the regime established by Helian
425
Bobo) was conquered by Beiwei.
426 427
Despite some farming activity near rivers, lakes, and other ecological refuges (Deng et al.,
428
2001; Wang and Dong, 2001), animal husbandry became the basic subsistence economy in
429
the region (Text S17). Animals, such as sheep, goats, horses, and cattle, could be bred in large
430
numbers here (Text S17). As a stage for fierce competition among northern ethnic minorities
431
(e.g., Hun, Xianbei, Jie, Qiang, and Di), the desert witnessed the exchange and integration of
432
different cultures (Deng et al., 2003), among which Buddhism began to be universally
433
respected and welcomed. Its prevalence was more or less related to the deterioration of
434
natural conditions and social unrest at that time.
435 436
3.3. Continued population growth and desertification during the Sui and Tang dynasties (AD
437
581–907)
438
Environmental degradation seemed to continue. The number of HASs in the MUDISA during
439
the Sui and Tang dynasties remained small (59 sites, Fig. 2C and Table 1), with the HAS
440
Minimum Enclosing Rectangle reducing to its minimum of 75,690 km2 for all three periods
441
(Fig. 2F). These HASs generally retreated to the southern regions of the desert and loess (Fig.
442
2). Meanwhile, HASs still formed a relatively high-density area (>99 per ha) around the
443
ancient Xiazhou City (namely the ancient Tongwan City); people also moved closer to rivers
444
in the eastern valley plain (Fig. 2F and Table 3). All of these situations can be regarded as
445
humans’ response to the dry climate (Fig. 7; Huang et al., 2009). Compared with the era of 24
446
disunity, both the number of desert HASs and their percentage in the total MUDISA HAS
447
count increased slightly (32 sites and ~54.2%, Table 1). The desert’s populations reached
448
~77,180 and ~84,089 for the Sui Dynasty and the middle of the Tang Dynasty, respectively.
449
Meanwhile, populations in the ancient Xiazhou City and its surrounding area were ~19,455
450
(25.2% of the 77,180) and ~25,638 (30.5% of the 84,089), respectively (Fig. 4). Similarly, the
451
mean population of the desert’s settlements (consisting of city and general settlement sites)
452
during the Sui and Tang dynasties still remained at a relatively high level.
453 454
That the Mu Us Desert was continuing the rapid desertification from the previous period is
455
strongly supported by evidence from stratigraphic profiles (Fig. 7B and C) and historical
456
records (Texts S18–S22). Most of the desert was filled with quicksand (Text S20), and the
457
ancient Xiazhou City and vast areas of the desert west of the ancient Xiazhou City suffered
458
from raging sandstorms (Texts S18 and S21). The desert’s hinterland was full of sand seas
459
(Texts S19 and S22). Ubiquitous shifting dunes may have spread over large areas, with water
460
resources from seasonal rivers and lakes becoming even scarcer. Consequently, the desert
461
may have witnessed further fragmentation of surface ecological landscapes during this
462
period.
463 464
According to the travel records of a geographer called Jia Dan (AD 730–805) who lived
465
during the Tang Dynasty, we calculated the average distance (15.9 km) between the oases
466
mentioned within the desert (Text S23). This value is quite consistent with the mean value
467
(16.6 km) of the nearest distances of the desert HASs (Table 2), confirming the rationality of 25
468
applying HAS spatial distribution to characterize ecological landscape fragmentation. Some
469
relatively large scattering oases were occupied by ancient cities such as the ancient Xiazhou
470
City and the five cities of the Liuhuzhou (Fig. 1B). The development of these cities was
471
related to administrative policies of the Tang government to settle nomadic people (Texts S24
472
and S25), and these ecological refuges supported the desert’s HASs, which accounted for a
473
relatively high proportion of the total number of HASs in the MUDISA during the regional
474
desertification. As previously analyzed, the desert’s increasing population during this period,
475
especially high-intensity human activities near the city sites located in oasis zones, may have
476
further promoted the desertification controlled by the dry climate.
477 478
Sporadically scattered on the remaining oases (Texts S25 and S26), agricultural development
479
was greatly restricted. The dominant economy was still animal husbandry (Texts S18 and
480
S20), feeding nomads such as the Tujue, Dangxiang, and Sute. The then desert was also part
481
of an important supply base for horses. Located on the transportation hub of the extended Silk
482
Road, multi-cultural beliefs (e.g., Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and Shamanism) were
483
accompanied by multi-ethnic immigration and mixed residence. The long-term maintenance
484
and conflict of this cultural diversity can therefore be viewed as an ideological reflection of
485
uninterrupted struggles among different groups for limited living resources and space
486
(D’Odorico et al., 2013).
487 488
3.4. Impact of human activities on the regional eco-environment
489
In this study, human beings primarily affected the regional ecological environment through 26
490
agricultural and animal husbandry activities (Guo et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2002). High
491
population density and associated high-intensity cultivation and grazing directly reduced
492
surface vegetation (Roskin et al., 2013), and this maintained a living economy and supplied
493
the demands for civil engineering, fuel, and tool making. Fine soil particles in the
494
human-induced exposed fields (e.g., farmland and grassland) that were constantly being
495
disturbed were more easily blown away by wind, leaving only sand and stones (Deng et al.,
496
2001; Sun, 2000). It is noteworthy that agricultural irrigation and the nomadism that
497
propagated and spread widely under favorable conditions largely consumed the already
498
limited water resources. Not only did this process increase the degree of regional
499
desertification but also potentially caused considerable soil organic matter to be leached out
500
and washed away, given that most places attracting these anthropogenic activities were
501
located in relatively fertile areas.
502 503
The impact of the abovementioned anthropogenic factors cannot be underestimated for the
504
desertification of the Mu Us Desert in this study. This view is not only consistent with other
505
studies focusing on this desert’s historical desertification (Guo et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019;
506
Sun, 2000; Xiao et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2002) but also supported by research on modern
507
desertification involving this (Liang and Yang, 2016; Xu et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2015) and
508
other deserts worldwide (D’Odorico et al., 2013; Kouba et al., 2018; Lamqadem et al., 2018;
509
Varghese and Singh, 2016; Zhou et al., 2013). The Net Primary Productivity (NPP) model (Q.
510
Li et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2015) can quantitatively assess
511
the relative roles of climate change and human activities in modern desertification processes. 27
512
The relative contributions of these two factors to desertification can be revealed according to
513
changes in potential NPP and the difference between potential and actual NPP. Using this
514
model, Xu et al. (2009) revealed that the relative contributions of climate change and human
515
activities in the desertification of the Ordos area from 1981 to 2000 were 54.87% and 45.13%,
516
respectively. Similar studies were conducted on the modern desertification of northwest
517
China (Zhou et al., 2015) and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (Q. Li et al., 2016), with
518
anthropogenic contributions accounting for 70.3% and 58.6%, respectively.
519 520
During the Qin and Han dynasties, the large number of settlements and the rise and fall of
521
over-farming triggered by political and/or military factor(s) potentially disturbed the desert’s
522
already fragile ecosystem, leading to land degradation (Text S10). From AD 220 to 907, the
523
large-scale human population and the presence of extensive livestock contributed to the
524
desert’s ecological deterioration and desertification. After all, compared with agriculture, the
525
animal husbandry activities were spread over a much wider area within the desert, not just
526
near the HASs (section “2.2. Human archaeological sites”). As a pivotal center of politics,
527
military, and economy in the MUDISA, the ancient Tongwan/Xiazhou City and its
528
surrounding area had maintained a population of tens of thousands (Fig. 4); the intensified
529
human activity (mainly grazing and cultivation) (Texts S17 and S26; Deng et al., 2001) may
530
have profoundly affected the area’s sandy landscape evolution up to modern times (Fig. 3).
531 532
However, we emphasize that natural conditions represented by the climate change and
533
geographical environment were the dominant factors for the historical desertification in our 28
534
study; this explains why the desertification occurred during the era of disunity and the Sui
535
and Tang dynasties, while the numbers for both the HASs and populations were generally
536
lower than during the Qin and Han dynasties. This view is partly supported by other scholars.
537
Li et al. (2019), for example, revealed that a cold and dry climate led to strong dune activity
538
in the Mu Us Desert from AD 500 to AD 600; Liu and Lai (2012) found a paleo-lake’s
539
ultimate desiccation between 1.8 and 1.0 thousand years before AD 1950 in the southern Mu
540
Us Desert, which may indicate the desert’s obvious desertification then; and Wang et al.
541
(2005) confirmed that desertification during the past several decades were mainly related to
542
climatic fluctuations. When coupled with natural factors, anthropogenic activities
543
significantly contributed to historical desertification; this contribution rate could be amplified
544
under dry climate conditions. We call this mechanism the “human superimposed effect,”
545
which has also been confirmed by modern studies (Huang et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017;
546
J.C. Li et al., 2016; Liu, 2009; Villagra et al., 2009). This kind of eco-environmental
547
exacerbation around ancient cities and/or in oasis areas with high demographic pressure was
548
a crucial way in which human beings may have promoted regional desertification (Texts S11,
549
S13, S15, S23, S25, and S26; Shen et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017).
550 551
4. Conclusions
552
We revealed the holistic and continuous process of human–nature interaction and
553
corresponding driving mechanisms for desertification on a regional scale during a 1128-year
554
historical period. The MUDISA experienced large-scale immigration and agricultural
555
reclamation implemented by the centralized governments during the ecologically favorable 29
556
period of the Qin and Han dynasties. However, pressures from large-scale HASs, population,
557
and cultivation potentially disturbed the eco-environmental equilibrium that may have been
558
closely related to subsequent land degradation within the Mu Us Desert. Coinciding with the
559
deteriorating natural environment from AD 220 to 907, the MUDISA was dominated by
560
animal husbandry, with the number of HASs sharply reduced and scattered in the desert.
561
Coupled with the sandy strata and an increasingly dry climate (Fig. 7A), both the increasingly
562
large-scale human population and extensive livestock presence accelerated the climate-driven
563
desertification and ecological landscape fragmentation. Although the historical desertification
564
was mainly driven by natural conditions, the human superimposed effect explained above
565
could promote desertification on a regional scale, especially by exacerbating local
566
eco-environment weaknesses in densely populated areas located around ancient cities and/or
567
in oases.
568 569
This multi-disciplinary research circumvents the locality and low temporal resolution of
570
single stratigraphic section data, as well as probable inaccurate interpretation of some
571
historical records and/or some ancient city distribution. Our approach integrates quantitative
572
analysis and qualitative description, and may shed new light on regional studies of historical
573
environmental changes in arid and/or semi-arid areas of northwest China and globally.
574
Regarding the current construction of the ecological environment and sustainable
575
development in the Mu Us Desert, we should fully respect the laws of natural environment
576
evolution while protecting local vegetation and water resources. More importantly, the scope
577
and scale of farming and grazing in the desert must be strictly limited to within reasonable 30
578
thresholds to avoid potential land degradation during dry years.
579 580
Acknowledgements
581
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
582
(Grant Nos. 41330748 and 41230634). We thank the Ordos Municipal Administration of
583
Cultural Heritage (Inner Mongolia) and Yanchi Municipal Administration of Cultural
584
Heritage (Ningxia) for providing access to the latest archaeological discoveries, as well as the
585
Loess Plateau Data Center, National Earth System Science Data Sharing Infrastructure,
586
National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China (http://loess.geodata.cn) for sharing
587
basic geographic data. Sincere thanks are extended to the three anonymous reviewers and to
588
Dr. Ralf Ludwig (the editor) for their kindness and helpful comments to improve the
589
manuscript.
590 591
Appendix A. Supplementary data and materials
592
Supplementary data and materials to this article, including Supporting Texts S1–S27 and
593
Tables S1–S3, can be found online at ------.
594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604
References Ban, G., 2002. Hanshu (Historical Records of the Han Dynasty). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Bureau of National Cultural Relics, 1998. Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics-Fascicule of Shaanxi Province. Xi’an Cartographic Press, Xi’an (in Chinese). Bureau of National Cultural Relics, 2003. Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics-Fascicule of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Xi’an Cartographic Press, Xi’an (in Chinese). Bureau of National Cultural Relics, 2010. Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics-Fascicule of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Cui, J.X., Chang, H., 2013. The possible climate impact on the collapse of an ancient urban 31
605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648
city in Mu Us Desert, China. Reg. Envir. Chang. 13 (2), 353–364. D’Odorico, P., Bhattachan, A., Davis, K.F., Ravi, S., Runyan, C.W., 2013. Global desertification: Drivers and feedbacks. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 326–344. Deng, H., Xia, Z.K., Wang, B.Y., 2001. Human activities’ influence on the area of weak ecological environment in terms of the rise and fall of Tongwan City. J. Chin. Hist. Geogr. 16 (2), 104–113 (in Chinese). Deng, H., Xia, Z.K., Wang, B.Y., 2003. Restudy on the ancient Tongwan City using colored infrared aerial image. Archaeology (1), 70–77 (in Chinese with English abstract). Department of Geography in Peking University, Committee on Comprehensive Investigation of Natural Resources of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhon Institute of Desert Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou Institute of Glaciology and Cryopedology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1983. Natural conditions and their improvement and Utilization in the Mu Us Desert. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Dong, G.R., Gao, S.Y., Jin, J., Li, B.S., 1989. The formation, evolution and cause of the Mu Us Desert in China. Sci. China Ser. B 32 (7), 859–872. Fan, Y., 2003. Houhanshu (Historical Records of the Eastern Han Dynasty). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Guo, Y.L., 1995. Sarcophagus and epitaph of Hui Yang of the Tang Dynasty unearthed in Jingbian. Archaeol. Cult. Relics (4), 39–42 (in Chinese). Guo, L.C., Xiong, S.F., Wu, J.B., Ding, Z.L., Chen, Y.L., Zhu, L.D., Ye, W., 2018. Human activity induced asynchronous dune mobilization in the deserts of NE China during the late Holocene. Aeolian Res. 34, 49–55. Hou, R.Z., 1973. Historical changes of the Mu Us Desert speculated through the ancient cities near the Hongliu River. Cult. Relics (1), 35–41 (in Chinese). Hu, K., 2015. Preliminary discussion on the ancient channel near the ancient Tongwan City discovered by DEM hydrologic analysis and its environmental significance. Archaeol. Cult. Relics 36 (4), 120–123 (in Chinese with English abstract). Huang, Y.Z., Wang, N.A., He, T.H., Chen, H.Y., Zhao, L.Q., 2009. Historical desertification of the Mu Us Desert, Northern China: A multidisciplinary study. Geomorphology 110 (3–4), 108–117. Huang, J.P., Yu, H.P., Guan, X.D., Wang, G.Y., Guo, R.X., 2016. Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6 (2), 166–172. Huang, J., Li, Y., Fu, C., Chen, F., Fu, Q., Dai, A., Shinoda, M., Ma, Z., Guo, W., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Yu, H., He, Y., Xie, Y., Guan, X., Ji, M., Lin, L., Wang, S., Yan, H., Wang, G., 2017. Dryland climate change: Recent progress and challenges. Rev. Geophys. 55 (3), 719–778. Jiang, W.Y., Guiot, J., Chu, G.Q., Wu, H.B., Yuan, B.Y., Hatte, C., Guo, Z.T., 2010. An improved methodology of the modern analogues technique for palaeoclimate reconstruction in arid and semi-arid regions. Boreas 39 (1), 145–153. Kou, X.S., Wang, B.P., Hu, S.M., 2006. A brief report on the excavation of Western Han tomb at Zhangjiawa, Jingbian County, Shaanxi Province. Archaeol. Cult. Relics (4), 3–9 (in Chinese with English abstract). Kouba, Y., Gartzia, M., El Aich, A., Alados, C.L., 2018. Deserts do not advance, they are created: Land degradation and desertification in semiarid environments in the Middle Atlas, 32
649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692
Morocco. J. Arid. Environ. 158, 1–8. Lamqadem, A.A., Pradhan, B., Saber, H., Rahimi, A., 2018. Desertification sensitivity analysis using MEDALUS model and GIS: A case study of the oases of Middle Draa Valley, Morocco. Sensors 18 (7), 1–19. Leading group of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region for the Third National Cultural Relics Survey, 2011. New discoveries of the Third National Cultural Relics Survey in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Leading group of Yanchi County for the Third National Cultural Relics Survey. Directories of the Third National Cultural Relics Survey in Yanchi County (Unpublished internal materials, in Chinese). Li, B.S., Zhang, D.D., Jin, H.L., Wu, Z., Yan, M.C., Sun, W., Zhu, Y.Z., Sun, D.H., 2000. Paleo-monsoon activities of Mu Us Desert, China since 150 ka B.P.—a study of the stratigraphic sequences of the Milanggouwan Section, Salawusu River area. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 162 (1–2), 1–16. Li, B.S., Gao, S.Y., Dong, G.R., Jin, H.L., 2005. Environmental evolution of Ordos Desert in China since 1.1 Ma B.P. as indicated by Yulin stratigraphical section and its grain-size analysis results. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 15 (1), 34–41. Li, D.Y., 2009. Shuijing Zhu (Notes on the Book of Waterways). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Li, S.B., Gao, Y., Wang, Q.Y., Bai, Q.Y., Dou, Z.B., Wang, Z.P., Qian, S.Y., Wei, L.H., Su, Y.L., Suo, X.F., Ma, J., Tian, L., Guo, D.Y., 2012. A brief archaeological report on the Guojialiangcun tombs of the Beiwei period in Wushen, Inner Mongolia. Cult. Relics Central China (1), 8–11 (in Chinese with English abstract). Li, S.H., Sun, J.M., Li, B., 2012. Holocene environmental changes in central Inner Mongolia revealed by luminescence dating of sediments from the Sala Us River valley. Holocene 22 (4), 397–404. Li, S.B., Gao, Y., Wang, Q.Y., Bai, Q.Y., Dou, Z.B., Wang, Z.P., Qian, S.Y., Wei, L.H., Su, Y.L., Suo, X.F., Li, L.Y., Wei, K., Ma, J., Tian, L., Li, T.J., Guo, D.Y., Bai, Y.F., Ma, Y., Guo, L., 2015. Archaeological bulletin on the Guojialiangcun tombs of the Beichao period in Wushen, Inner Mongolia. Huaxia Archaeol. (2), 48–55 (in Chinese with English abstract). Li, J.C., Zhao, Y.F., Liu, H.X., Su, Z.Z., 2016. Sandy desertification cycles in the southwestern Mu Us Desert in China over the past 80 years recorded based on nebkha sediments. Aeolian Res. 20, 100–107. Li, Q., Zhang, C.L., Shen, Y.P., Jia, W.R., Li, J., 2016. Quantitative assessment of the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification processes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on net primary productivity. Catena 147, 789–796. Li, J.C., Wang, Y., Liu, R.T., Zhang, L.S., Han, L.Y., 2019. Strong dune activity and the forcing mechanisms of dune fields in northeastern China during the last 2 kyr. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 514, 92–97. Liang, P., Yang, X.P., 2016. Landscape spatial patterns in the Maowusu (Mu Us) Sandy Land, northern China and their impact factors. Catena 145, 321–333. Liu, X., 2002. Jiu Tangshu (Old Book of Tang’s History). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). 33
693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736
Liu, D.S., 2009. Loess and arid environment. Anhui Science & Technology Publishing House, Hefei (in Chinese). Liu, K., Lai, Z.P., 2012. Chronology of Holocene sediments from the archaeological Salawusu site in the Mu Us Desert in China and its palaeoenvironmental implications. J. Asian Earth Sci. 45, 247–255. Lv, Z.R., Zhang, P.C., 2004. Mural tombs of the Eastern Han Dynasty discovered in Haotan of Dingbian, Shaanxi. Archaeol. Cult. Relics (5), 20–21 (in Chinese). Ma, J., Yue, L.P., Yang, L.R., Sun, L., Xu, Y., 2011. OSL dating of Holocene sequence and palaeoclimate change record in southeastern margin of Mu Us Desert, north China. Quat. Sci. 31 (1), 120–129 (in Chinese with English abstract). Nie, J.S., Stevens, T., Rittner, M., Stockli, D., Garzanti, E., Limonta, M., Bird, A., Ando, S., Vermeesch, P., Saylor, J., Lu, H.Y., Breecker, D., Hu, X.F., Liu, S.P., Resentini, A., Vezzoli, G., Peng, W.B., Carter, A., Ji, S.C., Pan, B.T., 2015. Loess Plateau storage of northeastern Tibetan Plateau-derived Yellow River sediment. Nat. Commun. 6 (8511), 1–8. Ordos Municipal Bureau of Culture, Leading group of the Ordos for the Third National Cultural Relics Survey. New discoveries of the Third National Cultural Relics Survey in Ordos City (Unpublished internal materials, in Chinese). Qiao, J.J., Ji, X.Y., Zhang, L., 2011. Excavation of Laofenliang cemetery of Han Dynasty in Jingbian, Shaanxi. Cult. Relics (10), 51–69 (in Chinese with English abstract). Roskin, J., Katra, I., Blumberg, D.G., 2013. Late Holocene dune mobilizations in the northwestern Negev dunefield, Israel: A response to combined anthropogenic activity and short-term intensified windiness. Quat. Int. 303, 10–23. Shaanxi Provincial Cultural Relics Bureau, 2012. Series of books of the Third National Cultural Relics Survey in Shaanxi Province. Shaanxi Tourism Press, Xi’an (in Chinese). Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, Cultural Relics Management Committee of Yulin City, 2001. Dabaodang of Shenmu: Archaeological report on the city site and tombs in the Han Dynasty. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). Shen, Q., Gao, G.Y., Han, F., Xiao, F.Y., Ma, Y., Wang, S., Fu, B.J., 2018. Quantifying the effects of human activities and climate variability on vegetation cover change in a hyper-arid endorheic basin. Land Degrad. Dev. 29 (10), 3294–3304. Sima, G., 1995. Zizhi Tongjian (History as a Mirror). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Song, Q., 2003. Xin Tangshu (New Book of Tang’s History). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Su, Z.Z., Wu, Y.J., Kong, M.Y., Ma, Y.J., Liang, A.M., Liu, M.M., Zhang, C.X., 2018. Climate Change Revealed by Geochemical Major Elements during Holocene in the Southeastern Mu Us Desert. J. Desert Res. 38 (3), 516–523 (in Chinese with English abstract). Sun, J.M., 2000. Origin of eolian sand mobilization during the past 2300 years in the Mu Us Desert, China. Quat. Res. 53 (1), 78–88. Tan, Q.X., 1982. Historical Atlas of China. Cartographic Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese). Tang, G.A., Yang, X., 2012. ArcGIS experimental tutorial on geographic information system spatial analysis. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese). 34
737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780
Varghese, N., Singh, N.P., 2016. Linkages between land use changes, desertification and human development in the Thar Desert Region of India. Land Use Pol. 51, 18–25. Villagra, P.E., Defosse, G.E., del Valle, H.F., Tabeni, S., Rostagno, M., Cesca, E., Abraham, E., 2009. Land use and disturbance effects on the dynamics of natural ecosystems of the Monte Desert: Implications for their management. J. Arid. Environ. 73 (2), 202–211. Wang, S.Y., Dong, J.B., 2001. The rise and fall of Tongwan City with the environmental change of Mu Us Sandy Land. Geogr. Res. 20 (3), 347–353 (in Chinese with English abstract). Wang, X., Chen, F.H., Dong, Z., Xia, D., 2005. Evolution of the southern Mu Us Desert in north China over the past 50 years: An analysis using proxies of human activity and climate parameters. Land Degrad. Dev. 16 (4), 351–366. Wang, T.S., 2006. History of the Hetao area. People’s Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese). Wang, T.Y., Jin, P.J., Ma, M.Z., 2011. Identification and preliminary analysis of grains unearthed from the Laofenliang tombs in Jingbian, northern Shaanxi. Agric. Archaeol. (1), 12–14 (in Chinese). Wei, Z., 2002. Suishu (Book of Sui’s History). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Wei, S., 2003. Weishu (Historical Records of the Wei Dynasty). Zhonghua Book Company, Beijing (in Chinese). Wen, X.H., Li, B.S., Zheng, Y.M., Yang, Q.J., Niu, D.F., Shu, P.X., 2016. Early Holocene multi-centennial moisture change reconstructed from lithology, grain-size and chemical composition data in the eastern Mu Us desert and potential driving forces. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 459, 440–452. Xiao, J.L., Nakamura, T., Lu, H.Y., Zhang, G.Y., 2002. Holocene climate changes over the desert/loess transition of north-central China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 197 (1–2), 11–18. Xu, D.Y., Kang, X.W., Liu, Z.L., Zhuang, D.F., Pan, J.J., 2009. Assessment of the relative role of climate change and human activities in Ordos desertification. Sci. China Ser. D 39 (4), 516–528 (in Chinese with English abstract). Xu, D.Y., Li, C.L., Zhuang, D.F., Pan, J.J., 2011. Assessment of the relative role of climate change and human activities in desertification: A review. J. Geogr. Sci. 21 (5), 926–936. Xu, Z.W., Lu, H.Y., Yi, S.W., Vandenberghe, J., Mason, J.A., Zhou, Y.L., Wang, X.Y., 2015. Climate-driven changes to dune activity during the Last Glacial Maximum and deglaciation in the Mu Us dune field, north-central China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 427, 149–159. Yin, S.P., Wang, W.S., Qiao, J.J., Sun, X.Z., Wang, M., Wang, X.X., Zhang, Y.J., 2009. Mural tombs of the Eastern Han Dynasty in Jingbian, Shaanxi. Cult. Relics (2), 32–43 (in Chinese). Zhang, K.C., An, Z.S., Cai, D.W., Guo, Z.C., Xiao, J.H., 2017. Key role of desert-oasis transitional area in avoiding oasis land degradation from aeolian desertification in Dunhuang, northwest China. Land Degrad. Dev. 28 (1), 142–150. Zhao, H., Sheng, Y.W., Li, B., Fan, Y.X., 2016. Holocene environment changes around the Sara Us River, northern China, revealed by optical dating of lacustrine-aeolian sediments. J. Asian Earth Sci. 120, 184–191. Zhao, S., Xia, D.S., Jin, H.L., Jia, J., Li, G.H., Gao, F.Y., Wang, Y.J., 2016. Long-term 35
781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795
weakening of the East Asian summer and winter monsoons during the mid- to late Holocene recorded by aeolian deposits at the eastern edge of the Mu Us Desert. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 457, 258–268. Zhou, W.J., Dodson, J., Head, M.J., Li, B.S., Hou, Y.J., Lu, X.F., Donahue, D.J., Jull, A.J.T., 2002. Environmental variability within the Chinese desert-loess transition zone over the last 20000 years. Holocene 12 (1), 107–112. Zhou, Y.L., Lu H.Y., Zhang J.F., Mason J.A., Zhou L.P., 2009. Luminescence dating of sand-loess sequences and response of Mu Us and Otindag sand fields (north China) to climatic changes. J. Quat. Sci. 24 (4), 336–344. Zhou, W., Sun, Z.G., Li, J.L., Gang, C.C., Zhang, C.B., 2013. Desertification dynamic and the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification in the Heihe River Basin based on NPP. J. Arid Land 5 (4), 465–479. Zhou, W., Gang, C.C., Zhou, F.C., Li, J.L., Dong, X.G., Zhao, C.Z., 2015. Quantitative assessment of the individual contribution of climate and human factors to desertification in northwest China using net primary productivity as an indicator. Ecol. Indic. 48, 560–569.
796
797
36
798
37
799
38
800
801 39
802
803 804
Table 1
805
Statistics for human archaeological sites (three types) in three historical periods in the Mu Us 40
806
Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA), as well as in the Mu Us Desert. Archaeological site MUDISA General settlement site City site Burial area site Total (N)
Qin and Han n1 n1/N (%) 454 57.5 41 5.2 295 37.3 790 100
era of disunity n2 n2/N (%) 9 27.3 5 15.1 19 57.6 33 100
Sui and Tang n3 n3/N (%) 11 18.7 16 27.1 32 54.2 59 100
Mu Us Desert General settlement site City site Burial area site Total (N)
n1 139 11 81 231
n2 5 2 10 17
n3 3 9 20 32
n1/N (%) 60.2 4.7 35.1 100
n2/N (%) 29.4 11.8 58.8 100
n3/N (%) 9.4 28.1 62.5 100
807 808 809
Table 2
810
Nearest distance statistics between human archaeological sites for three historical periods in
811
the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA), and in the Mu Us Desert. Distance
812
unit: km; SD: standard deviation. Historical period Qin and Han era of disunity Sui and Tang
N 790 33 59
MUDISA Range Mean±SD 0.2–33.5 3.9±4.1 0.7–64.2 18.6±19.9 0.5–65.0 13.2±12.3
n 231 17 32
Mu Us Desert n/N (%) Range 29.2 0.3–36.8 51.5 0.7–53.7 54.2 0.5–77.7
Mean±SD 4.7±5.1 9.8±14.2 16.6±18.8
813 814 815
Table 3
816
Nearest distance statistics for human archaeological sites (HASs) during three historical
817
periods in the eastern valley plain (EVP) and the Mu Us Desert to the eastern historical rivers
818
in the Mu Us Desert and its surrounding area (MUDISA). Distance unit: km; the EVP
819
consists of the counties of Shenmu, Yulin, Hengshan, and Jiaxian (northern part, Fig. 1B); SD: 41
820
standard deviation; n1, n2, and n3 represent the numbers of relevant HASs with the nearest
821
distances of no more than 1 km, 5 km, and 10 km to the rivers, respectively. Region and period Qin and Han EVP era of disunity Sui and Tang Mu Us Qin and Han Desert era of disunity Sui and Tang
N 238 9 16 231 17 32
Range <0.1–23.8 0.1–22.5 0.1–22.5 <0.1–83.8 0.3–30.7 0.2–80.4
Mean±SD 5.5±5.1 7.0±8.1 5.1±6.4 19.6±22.8 9.9±10.2 17.9±23.3
n1/N (%) 22.3 44.4 31.3 10.8 23.5 12.5
n2/N (%) 54.2 55.6 68.8 33.8 41.2 34.4
822 823 824
Graphical Abstract:
825 826 827
Highlights:
828
• We revealed human–nature interactions during a 1128-year historical period.
829
• Qin and Han: farming boom in an ecologically favorable environment.
830
• Era of disunity: HAS exodus and grazing increase in regional desertification.
831
• Sui and Tang: increasing population and livestock with continuing land degradation.
832
• Human activities accelerated climate-driven desertification in the Mu Us Desert.
833
42
n3/N (%) 83.6 66.7 81.3 54.5 70.6 56.3