Accepted Manuscript Title: HPMC as a potential enhancer of nimodipine biopharmaceutical properties via ball-milled solid dispersions Author: Manoela Kl¨uppel Riekes Gislaine Kuminek Gabriela Schneider Rauber Carlos Eduardo Maduro de Campos Adailton Jo˜ao Bortoluzzi Hellen Karine Stulzer PII: DOI: Reference:
S0144-8617(13)00830-8 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.046 CARP 8036
To appear in: Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
6-5-2013 12-8-2013 18-8-2013
Please cite this article as: Riekes, M. K., Kuminek, G., Rauber, G. S., Campos, C. E. M., Bortoluzzi, A. J., & Stulzer, H. K., HPMC as a potential enhancer of nimodipine biopharmaceutical properties via ball-milled solid dispersions, Carbohydrate Polymers (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.046 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
HPMC as a potential enhancer of nimodipine biopharmaceutical properties via ball-milled solid dispersions Manoela Klüppel Riekes1, Gislaine Kuminek1, Gabriela Schneider Rauber1, Carlos Eduardo Maduro de Campos2, Adailton João Bortoluzzi3, Hellen Karine Stulzer1* 1
ip t
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88040-970, Brazil 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88040-970, Brazil 3 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88040-970, Brazil
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
* corresponding author:
[email protected], +55 (48) 3721-4585, + 55 (48) 3721-9542
E-mail addresses of other authors: Manoela Klüppel Riekes:
[email protected] Gislaine Kuminek:
[email protected] Gabriela Schneider Rauber:
[email protected] Carlos Eduardo Maduro de Campos:
[email protected] Adailton João Bortoluzzi:
[email protected]
1 Page 1 of 28
ABSTRACT
ip t
The poor solubility of drugs remains one of the most challenging aspects of formulation development. Aiming at improving the biopharmaceutical limitations of the calcium channel blocker nimodipine, the development of solid dispersions is proposed herein. Three different proportions of nimodipine:HPMC were tested and all of them generated amorphous solid dispersions. Improvements of up 318 % in the solubility and a 4-fold increase in the dissolution rate of nimodipine were achieved. Stability studies conducted over 90 days in a desiccator indicated that the initial characteristic of the formulations were maintained. However, at 40 °C/75 % RH recrystallization was observed for solid dispersions with 70 and 80 % of HPMC, whilst the formulation composed of 90 % of the carrier remained amorphous. The increase in the stability observed when the HPMC concentration was increased from 70 to 90 % in the SDs was attributed to the dilution mechanism.
cr
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
13
us
12
Keywords: nimodipine, HPMC, solid dispersion, biopharmaceutical properties
an
14 15
M
16 17
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
te
20
Ac ce p
19
d
18
28 29 30 31 32 2 Page 2 of 28
1. INTRODUCTION
34
Together with the permeability, the solubility behavior of an active pharmaceutical ingredient
35
(API) is the limiting step in terms of its oral bioavailability (Leuner & Dressman, 2000),
36
particularly for drugs with low gastrointestinal solubility and high permeability (Vasconcelos,
37
Sarmento & Costa, 2007). Currently, it is estimated that 70 % of the new APIs have poor
38
aqueous solubility (Ku & Dublin, 2010), and unfortunately, around 40 % of newly developed
39
drugs are rejected by the pharmaceutical industry due to their deficient biopharmaceutical
40
properties (Svenson, 2009).
41
Several formulation strategies have been proposed to improve the solubility and dissolution rate
42
of poorly water-soluble APIs and of these the solid dispersion (SD) technique has emerged as a
43
particularly effective approach (Alonzo et al., 2011; Konno, Handa, Alonzo & Taylor, 2008;
44
Newman, Knipp & Zografi, 2012; Vasconcelos, Sarmento & Costa, 2007). This technological
45
tool can be defined as the molecular dispersion of a drug in one or more hydrophilic carriers
46
(Padden et al., 2011; Vasconcelos, Sarmento & Costa, 2007) and its mechanism involves the
47
reduction of the particle size, the enhancement of the wettability of the API in the carrier, the
48
formation of soluble complexes and the obtainment of an amorphous drug (Craig, 2002; Zhong,
49
Zhu, Luo & Su, 2013). In SDs, hydrophilic polymers also play an important role inhibiting the
50
crystallization of the API through decreasing its molecular mobility (Bhugra & Pikal, 2008;
51
Yonemochi, Sano, Yoshihashi & Terada, 2013). In this context, the selection of the ideal carrier
52
is crucial to formulation success (Li et al., 2013).
53
Hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC), Fig. 1A, is a non-ionic and water soluble polymer
54
(Rogers, 2009), a mixed cellulose ether (Leuner & Dressman, 2000), which is of great
55
importance as a carrier in drug release systems, including SDs (Asare-Addo, Levina, Rajabi-
56
Siahboomin & Nokhodchi, 2011; Colombo, 1993; Leuner & Dressman, 2000; Pham & Lee,
57
1994). In this regard, HPMC is able to enhance the biopharmaceutical properties of many drugs.
58
Etravirine (Qi et al., 2013), fenofibrate (Kalivoda, Fischbach & Kleinebudde, 2012), mesalazine
59
(Ugandhar, 2012), tacrolimus (Yoshida et al., 2012), raloxifene hydrochloride (Shim et al.,
60
2013) and resveratrol (Wegiel, Mauer, Edgar & Taylor, 2013) are some of the most recent
61
examples. Publications in the literature report that HPMC can control the drug release rate due
62
to its swelling and dissolution properties in aqueous solution, which are probably associated
63
with the formation of soluble complexes between the water-soluble polymeric carrier and the
64
poorly-water-soluble drug (Oh et al., 2012).
65
Nimodipine (NMP), Fig. 1B, is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker recommended for
66
patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (Nguyen, 2004). This compound, which presents low
67
bioavailability (only 13%) and poor solubility in water, belongs to class II in the
68
Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) (Sweetman, 2009), which makes it an ideal
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
33
3 Page 3 of 28
69
candidate for SDs.
70
Modification I (Mod I) or the metastable form, a racemic compound that exhibits higher
71
solubility in water (360 ± 70 µg L-1), and Modification II (Mod II), the stable polymorph, which
72
is chemically a conglomerate (Grunenberg, Keil & Henck, 1995).
However, as an aggravating factor, it presents two polymorphs;
B RO H3C O OH
OR
H3C
O
OR
OR
O
CH 3 O
O
us
CH 3
O
CH3
O
OR O
H N
cr
A
ip t
73
NO2
O H
n– 2 2
OR
an
74 75
FIGURE 1
76
Some attempts to improve the biopharmaceutical properties of NMP through SDs obtained via
78
classical techniques have been reported (Adinarayana, Rajendran & Rao, 2010; Babu, Prasad &
79
Ramana-Murthy, 2002; Docoslis et al., 2007; Gorajana, Rao & Nee, 2011; Jijun et al., 2011;
80
Kreidel et al., 2012; Kumar, Kumar, Chanderparkash & Singh, 2009; Lu, Wang, Ding & Pan,
81
1995; Papageorgiou et al., 2009; Papaegorgiou, Docoslis, Georgarakis & Bikiaris, 2006;
82
Smikalla & Urbanetz, 2007; Urbanetz, 2006; Urbanetz & Lippold, 2005; Wu, Zhou & Zhang,
83
1998; Yunzhe, Rui, Wenliang & Tang, 2008; Zheng, Yang, Tang & Zheng, 2008). The
84
promising results obtained through these studies were determinant in the choice of NMP as a
85
model drug for the obtainment of novel SDs, prepared via an innovative technique and with a
86
potential carrier.
87
In comparison with other methods used to obtain SDs, high-energy milling has received less
88
attention in the literature (Patterson et al., 2007). However, it can be used to produce amorphous
89
materials (Boldyrev, Shakhtshneider, Burleva & Severtsev, 1994) or to form regions of
90
drug/excipient miscibility (Friedrich, Nada & Bodmeier, 2005). During the milling process,
91
sufficient strain is generated in the solid particles through a combination of impact and attrition,
92
producing structural changes on the crystal and the formation of amorphous regions, particularly
93
on the surface (Balani, Ng, Tan & Chan, 2010; Feng, Rodolfo & Carvajal, 2008; Mallick et al.,
94
2008). Unlike other techniques, milling is environmentally friendly, since it does not require the
95
use of organic solvents. Also, it consists of a relatively simple process which does not require
96
sophisticated equipment and which generally culminates in a decrease in the total experimental
Ac ce p
te
d
M
77
4 Page 4 of 28
97
time and easier scaling up (Barzegar-Jalali et al., 2010; Colombo, Grassi & Grass, 2009;
98
Gaisford, Dennison, Tawfik & Jones, 2010; Zhong, Zhu, Luo & Su, 2013).
99
In this context, the objective of this study was to verify the potential of using HPMC to obtain
100
amorphous and physically stable ball-milled SDs containing NMP. The aim of preparing these
101
formulations was to improve the biopharmaceutical properties of the API.
ip t
102 2. EXPERIMENTAL
104
2.1 MATERIALS
105
NMP was purchased from Chang Zhow ComWin Fine Chemicals (batch 20110305; Jiangsu,
106
China) and HPMC (Methocel K4M®) originating from Dow Chemical Company (Midland,
107
USA) was kindly donated by Colorcon do Brasil LTDA (batch TD 100112N11; Cotia, Brazil).
108
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade acetonitrile and methanol were
109
obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ). All other chemicals used were pharmaceutical
110
grade. During the analysis, ultrapure water was obtained using a Milli-Q Gradient System
111
(Millipore, Bedford, MA).
M
an
us
cr
103
112 2.2 METHODS
114
2.2.1 Preparation of ball-milled SDs
115
Firstly, the drug and carrier were accurately weighed to give a final mass of 2.5 g for all of the
116
formulations prepared. SDs composed of 1:9, 2:8 and 3:7 of NMP:HPMC (w/w) were denoted
117
as 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, respectively. Samples were milled in a Spex Dual Mixer Mill
118
8000 D (New Jersey, USA) in 40 mL steel jars for 180 min, at a ball:powder ratio of 4:1 (w/w)
119
and with three steel balls (two with an external diameter of 6.4 mm and one of 12.8 mm).
120
Milling was performed at room temperature and no heating of the samples was noted at the end
121
of the process.
te
Ac ce p
122
d
113
123
2.2.2 Preparation of physical mixtures
124
Physical mixtures were prepared through simple spatulation of drug and carrier, accurately
125
weighed in different proportions. Samples were denoted as 1:9 PM, 2:8 PM and 3:7 PM,
126
corresponding to NMP:HPMC ratios (w/w) of 1:9, 2:8 and 3:7, respectively.
127
5 Page 5 of 28
128
2.2.3 Stability studies
129
The samples were stored in a desiccator under vacuum at 40 °C and with 75 % of relative
130
humidity (NaCl saturated solution). Solid state stability studies on the SDs of NMP were
131
conducted over a period of 90 days.
ip t
132 2.2.4 HPLC analysis
134
The LC analysis was performed through a stability-indicating LC-method previously described
135
in the literature (Riekes et al., 2013) and employing a Shimadzu LC-10A system (Kyoto, Japan)
136
equipped with an LC-10AD pump, DGU-14A degasser, SPD-10AV variable-wavelength
137
detector (set at 235 nm) and an SCL-10AVP system controller unit. The experiments were
138
conducted on a reversed-phase Phenomenex (Torrance, CA) Luna C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm
139
i.d., 5 mm). A security guard holder (C18, 4.0 x 3.0 mm i.d.) was employed to protect the
140
column. The mobile phase was isocratically composed of acetonitrile:methanol:water (55:11:34
141
v/v/v), with a flow rate of 0.5 mL min-1, at 40.0 °C. The samples (at a theoretical concentration
142
of 20 µg mL-1) were filtered through a 0.45 mm membrane filter and a volume of 20 µL was
143
injected. Data acquisition was performed using CLASS-VP software to measure the detected
144
peaks. The content of NMP in SDs was expressed as relative values in relation to the theoretical
145
content of the drug in formulations.
us
an
M
d
te
146
cr
133
2.2.5 Measurement of solubility
148
In order to determine the NMP solubility, an excess of drug in SDs was weighed and added to
149
30 mL of acetate buffer (pH 4.5) containing 0.3 % of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), giving a final
150
concentration of 2.0 mg mL-1. Samples were kept under stirring at 150 rpm in a thermostatically
151
controlled water bath (37 ± 2 °C) (Dist, model DI-06) until a constant concentration of NMP
152
was reached. At pre-determined intervals, aliquots were withdrawn (with immediate
153
replacement of fresh solution) and filtered through 0.22 µm filters before taking the readings on
154
a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Cary 50 BIO, Varian) at 340 nm.
Ac ce p
147
155 156
2.2.6 Solid-state characterization of ball-milled SDs
157
2.2.6.1 X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)
6 Page 6 of 28
X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using a ! -! X-ray diffractometer (Xpert Pro Multi-
159
Purpose Diffractometer, PANAlytical) equipped with K! copper radiation (! = 1.5418 Å),
160
operating with a 40 mA current and 45 kV voltage, sample spinner and a Real Time Multiple
161
Strip (RTMS) detector. The measurements were performed at room temperature, scanning at 2!
162
from 5o to 50o, with a 0.03342o step size and 10.16 s step time.
163
During the stability studies, the diffractograms were acquired on a ! -! X-ray diffractometer (D2
164
Phaser, Bruker), operating with K! copper radiation (! = 1.5418 Å), at a current of 10 mA and
165
voltage of 30 kV. Detection was performed on a scintillation counter one-dimensional
166
LYNXEYE detector. The measurements were taken at room temperature, scanning at 2! from
167
5o to 50o, with a 0.091o step size.
us
cr
ip t
158
an
168 2.2.6.2 Thermal analysis
170
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was carried out in triplicate using a Shimadzu
171
calorimeter (DSC-60), operating in a temperature range of 40 – 130 °C. Samples weighing
172
approximately 2 mg were heated in sealed aluminum crucibles (model 201-53090) and scanned
173
at a first scan mode, at a heating rate of 2 °C min-1 and under nitrogen air atmosphere (50 mL
174
min-1). The DSC cell was previously calibrated with indium and zinc.
175
The mass loss of the samples as a function of temperature was determined in triplicate using a
176
Shimadzu thermobalance (TGA-50). Approximately 3 mg of samples were placed in open
177
platinum crucibles which were heated at a heating rate of 20 °C min−1, to temperatures ranging
178
from 40 to 800 °C under nitrogen atmosphere (50 mL min-1). The instrument was preliminarily
179
calibrated with a standard reference of calcium oxalate.
180
The thermal data obtained were processed using TA60 software.
d
te
Ac ce p
181
M
169
182
2.2.6.3 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
183
FTIR spectra were acquired on a Shimadzu spectrophotometer (FTIR Prestige), at room
184
temperature, from 4,000 to 400 cm−1, with the collection of 20 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1.
185
Samples were prepared by mixing 2 % (w/w) of the drug, carrier, physical mixtures and SDs in
186
potassium bromide (KBr).
187
7 Page 7 of 28
2.2.6.4 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
189
The samples were mounted on aluminum stubs, sputtered with gold (IC-50 Ion Coater,
190
Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SSX-550
191
Superscan, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 10 or 15 kV with different
192
magnifications.
cr
ip t
188
us
193 2.2.7 In vitro dissolution studies
195
Dissolution studies of the NMP and SDs were performed using the Varian VK 7000 dissolution
196
device and dissolution apparatus II (paddle), according to the specifications of British
197
Pharmacopoeia (British Pharmacopoeia, 2009), which describes the in vitro evaluation of NMP
198
tablets. A known amount of the drug (30 mg) was weighed and submitted to dissolution in 900
199
mL of previously-deaerated acetate buffer (pH 4.5) containing 0.3 % of SLS, kept at 37 ± 0.5 °C
200
and rotated at 75 rpm. At predetermined time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45 and 60 min) 4
201
mL aliquots were withdrawn (with immediate replacement of fresh dissolution medium) and
202
filtered through 0.22 µm filters before readings were taken on a UV/VIS spectrophotometer
203
(Varian UV/VIS CARY) at 340 nm. The correction for the cumulative dilution was calculated.
204
Dissolution experiments were carried out in triplicate and in the absence of light.
205
Dissolution profiles for the NMP and SDs were compared by independent and dependent
206
methods. For the model-independent analysis, the dissolution efficiency (DE) of the drug and
207
SDs was established. In this analysis the area under the dissolution curve at time t was
208
calculated through the trapezoidal rule and expressed as the percentage of the rectangle area
209
described by 100% of dissolution within the same period. The area under the curve was
210
determined using the Image Tool software, version 3.0. In vitro profiles were also investigated
211
by model-dependent methods, and the data were tested to fit first-order, zero-order, Hixson-
212
Crowell and Higuchi models (O’Hara, Dunne, Butler & Denave, 1998; Polli, Rekhi & Shah,
213
1996). The selection of the model-dependent method was based on the best fit obtained,
214
determined by considering the correlation coefficient (r) most similar to 1. The semi-empirical
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
194
8 Page 8 of 28
215
Korsmeyer-Peppas model was also evaluated correlating drug release to time through a simple
216
exponential equation (Mt/M∞ = k.tn). In this context, Mt/M∞ corresponds to the proportion of
217
drug released at time t, k is the kinetic constant, and it has been proposed that the exponent n is
218
indicative of the release mechanism (Korsmeyer, Gurny, Doelker, Buri & Peppas, 1983).
ip t
219 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
221
3.1 HPLC ANALYSIS
222
The experimental and relative values regarding the contents of NMP in SDs were 100.61 ± 0.43
223
%, 98.98 ± 0.04 % and 99.43 ± 0.35 % for 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, respectively. Also, no
224
degradation peak was observed in the chromatograms analyzed (Appendix A, Fig. A.1),
225
indicating the stability of the drug on employing this technique.
an
us
cr
220
226 3.2 MEASUREMENT OF SOLUBILITY
228
The results obtained for the NMP solubility indicated that improvements were achieved for all
229
of the SDs. Increases of 318.80 ± 1.31 %, 156.14 ± 1.29 % and 102.87 ± 0.99 % were observed
230
for 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, respectively. These data indicate that the solubility of NMP in
231
these SDs was dependent on the carrier concentration, the best result being obtained for the
232
formulation in which the proportion of HPMC was 90 % with 10 % of NMP. Also, the
233
increased solubility of NMP in the presence of HPMC could be due to the formation of soluble
234
complexes between the water-soluble polymeric carrier and poorly soluble drug (Oh et al.,
235
2012).
d
te
Ac ce p
236
M
227
237
3.3 SOLID-STATE CHARACTERIZATION OF BALL-MILLED SDs
238
3.3.1 XRPD
239
X-ray diffraction patterns related to the NMP crystalline phases (Mod I and Mod II) and the raw
240
material, HPMC, physical mixtures and SDs are shown in Fig. 2.
9 Page 9 of 28
3:7 SD
ip t
2:8 SD 1:9 SD
cr
3:7 PM
us
2:8 PM 1:9 PM
an
Milled NMP
M
d
NMP raw material Mod II calc
Ac ce p
te
HPMC
0
241 242 243
10
20
Mod I calc 30
40
50
2? FIGURE 2
244
According to Grunenberg, Keil and Henck, NMP presents two crystalline phases: Modification
245
I (Mod I) or the metastable form, a racemic compound that exhibits a higher solubility in water
246
(360 ± 70 µg L-1), and Modification II (Mod II), the stable polymorph, chemically defined as a
247
conglomerate (Grunenberg, Keil & Henck, 1995). These crystalline modifications can be easily
248
distinguished through various solid-state techniques, and the XRPD analysis produced very
249
different diffractograms for these samples, especially at low 2θ angles. The reflection at 6.6 ° is
250
only observed for Mod I, whilst that at 9.3 ° is present exclusively for Mod II (Docoslis
251
et al., 2007; Guo et al., 2011; Riekes et al., 2012; Yang, Ke, Zi, Liu & Yu, 2008). Through these 10 Page 10 of 28
analyses it is possible to affirm that the raw material acquired for the development of the SDs is
253
composed exclusively of the metastable polymorph Mod I.
254
On the other hand, the carrier is completely amorphous, in agreement with previous data
255
reported in literature (Cilurzo, Minghetti, Casiraghi & Montanari, 2002; Oh et al., 2012). For
256
all of the physical mixtures, it is possible to observe the crystalline reflections of the drug
257
overlapping the amorphous halo of the polymer. These data indicate the absence of physical
258
interactions between NMP and HPMC and also verify that amorphous halos related to the SDs
259
are due to the preparation process.
260
In order to determine the drug behavior during milling without a polymeric carrier, NMP was
261
milled for 3 hours. It is extremely important to note that without HPMC the API did not become
262
amorphous. In addition, the initial polymorph Mod I underwent a partial solid-state transition to
263
the less soluble crystalline phase Mod II, since both characteristic reflections at 6.6 ° (Mod I)
264
and at 9.3 ° (Mod II) were observed for this sample. These data demonstrate the importance of
265
adding HPMC to obtain amorphous SDs containing NMP.
266
Also, as can be observed, all of the SDs showed amorphous characteristics, explaining the
267
increase in the solubility of NMP in these formulations. The enhanced solubility is the result of
268
the disordered structure of the amorphous solid. Because of the short-range intermolecular
269
interactions in an amorphous system no lattice energy has to be overcome, whereas in the
270
crystalline material the lattice has to be disrupted in order for it to dissolve (Sathigari,
271
Radhakrishnan, Davis, Parsons & Babu, 2012; Shah, Kakumanu & Bansal, 2006).
cr
us
an
M
d
te
Ac ce p
272
ip t
252
273
3.3.2 Thermal analysis
274
The DSC and thermogravimetric curves for the drug, carrier and SDs are shown in Fig. 3.
275
According to Grunenberg, Keil and Henck NMP polymorphs can be also distinguished by
276
means of DSC, since Mod I shows an endothermic event at 124 ± 1 °C and Mod II melts at 116
277
± 1 °C (Grunenberg, Keil & Henck, 1995). As can be observed, the NMP raw material
278
presented a single melting event at 124.1 °C, confirming its identity as pure Mod I. This data is
279
in agreement with the previous XRPD results. No endothermic event was observed for HPMC,
280
which is consistent with data reported in the literature (Asare-Addo, Levina, Rajabi-Siahboomi
281
& Nokhodchi, 2011). However, discrete endothermic events at 115 and 125 °C were observed
282
for the sample 3:7 SD, indicating a crystallization of NMP into its two polymorphs during the
283
DSC analysis, at elevated temperatures. The absence of crystallization or melting events for the
284
samples 1:9 SD and 2:8 SD, besides indicating their amorphous state, may be due to the lower
285
contents of drug in these samples, which are probably lower than the limits of detection for each 11 Page 11 of 28
polymorph (Riekes et al., 2012). It is very important to mention that the endothermic events
287
found for the sample 3:7 SD does not indicate that this SD is crystalline, since the X-ray
288
analysis verified its amorphous state. In addition, although a single glass transition temperature
289
(Tg) was expected to verify the miscibility of the amorphous phases in the obtained SDs
290
(Palermo, Anderson & Drennen III, 2012), none of the DSC curves showed it. This fact can be
291
explained by the very broad Tg of the heterogeneous HPMC.
ip t
286
292
cr
mW
NMP
us
A
HPMC
an
1:9 SD 2:8 SD
60
TG A
80 90 100 Temperature (\ C)
110
120
130 DrTGA (mg/min)
Ac ce p
B
70
te
50
d
M
3:7 SD
NMP NMP HPMC HPMC 1:9 H1 SD 2:8 H2 SD 3:7 H3 SD
) % ( ss ol t h gi e W
Temperature (\C)
NMP
HPMC 1:9 SD 2:8 SD 3:7 SD
100 293 294
200
300
400 500 600 Temperature (\ C)
700
800
FIGURE 3 12 Page 12 of 28
The thermogravimetric analysis revealed that the NMP was thermally stable up to
296
approximately 250 °C, presenting a single weight loss event (96.2 %) in the temperature range
297
analyzed. The thermal degradation peak, obtained through derivative thermogravimetry,
298
occurred at 347.2 °C. These data are in agreement with previous reports in the literature
299
(Cardoso, Rodrigues, Stulzer, Silva & Matos, 2005). A higher thermal stability was noted for
300
HPMC, also in a single stage of degradation. The thermal degradation occurs at between 335 °C
301
and 425 °C, with a peak temperature of 391 °C. The weight loss for HPMC was of 93.4 %. For
302
the SDs the thermal degradation occurred in two steps (as evidenced by the DrTGA curves), and
303
the relative proportion of the two degradation events is directly proportional to the NMP and
304
HPMC contents of the samples. The first event represents the presence of NMP, whilst the
305
second one is related to HPMC. The weight losses were 94.2 %, 93.7 % and 92.3 %, for 1:9
306
SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, respectively.
us
cr
ip t
295
an
307 3.3.3 FTIR spectroscopy
309
The FTIR spectra for NMP, HPMC, 1:9 PM and SDs are shown in Fig. 4.
HPMC
Ac ce p
) % ( ec n a ti 1:9 PM m s n a r T
te
NMP
d
M
308
1:9 SD
2:8 SD
3:7 SD 4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000
310 311
800
600
400
Wavenumber (cm-1)
FIGURE 4
13 Page 13 of 28
Characteristic bands for NMP appear at 3,293 cm-1, related to N-H stretching of the polymorph
313
Mod I, at 1,695 cm-1, associated with the carbonyl bond, and at 1,523 cm-1, representing the NO2
314
group (Barmpalexis, Kachrimanis & Georgarakis, 2011; Hu et al., 2003; Papadimitriou,
315
Papageorgiou, Kanaze, Georgarakis & Bikiaris, 2009; Tang, Pikal & Taylor, 2002). In the case
316
of HPMC, bands were observed at 3,443 cm-1 (O-H stretching), at 2,935 cm-1 (C-H stretching),
317
at 1,651 cm-1 (C=O of the glucose unit) and at 1,069 cm-1 (C-O-C group) (Anuar, Wui,
318
Ghodgaonkar & Taib, 2007; Oliveira, Bernardi, Murakami, Mendes & Silva, 2009). In the
319
physical mixture, all of the characteristic bands for the drug and carrier are overlapped,
320
indicating the absence of physical interactions between these compounds. On the other hand,
321
bands related to the amine group of NMP disappeared for all of SDs, confirming the amorphous
322
characteristic of these formulations (Barmpalexis, Kachrimanis & Georgarakis, 2011), as
323
previously observed through XRPD and DSC analysis. Also, although shifts for the bands
324
related to HPMC were not observed, the merging of the O-H band of the carrier with the N-H
325
band of NMP indicates the establishment of hydrogen bonding in SDs. It is important to
326
mention that this kind of interaction between drug and carrier is an additional benefit for the
327
SDs, since they can increase the solid solubility of the drug into the hydrophilic carrier besides
328
acting on inhibiting the crystallization of the drug from a glass solution (Marsac, Shamblin &
329
Taylor, 2006; Van den Mooter, 2012). Cilurzo, Minghetti, Casiraghi and Montanari also
330
observed the disappearance of N-H stretching vibrations for amorphous SDs composed of
331
nifedipine and HPMC (Cilurzo, Minghetti, Casiraghi & Montanari, 2002).
332
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
312
3.3.3 SEM
334
Photomicrographs of the drug, carrier and SDs are shown in Appendix A (Fig. A. 2). Small
335
tabular crystals with a homogeneous particle size distribution can be observed for the NMP raw
336
material. However, particles with undefined shapes are observed for HPMC. From these images
337
it can be verified that the milling promoted considerable changes in the morphology of the NMP
338
and HPMC, generating agglomerates which did not seem to be influenced by the drug:carrier
339
proportion. It is important to mention that crystals of the drug were not observed on the surface
340
of the formulations, confirming its amorphous characteristic in SDs. Also, as no decrease in
341
particle size was noted for 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, it is assumed that the enhancement in
342
NMP solubility is due to the amorphous characteristic, the establishment of hydrogen bonding
343
and the presence of a hydrophilic carrier in SDs, which probably improved the wettability of
344
these formulations.
Ac ce p
333
345
14 Page 14 of 28
346
3.4 IN VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDIES
347
The release rates of the different SDs of NMP in acetate buffer (pH 4.5) containing 0.3 % of
348
SLS and of the pure drug are compared in Fig. 5.
ip t
100
an
us
cr
) % ( 80 se a el er P 60 M N e v it 40 a l u m u 20 C 0 0
10
20
40
50
60
Time (minutes)
M
349 350
d
FIGURE 5
te
351
30
As can be observed, all of the SDs were able to increase the dissolution rate of NMP. These data
353
are in agreement with the enhancement of the drug solubility in these formulations. The
354
formulation 1:9 SD promoted the release of approximately 100 % of NMP in 60 min, which
355
indicates a 3-fold increase in the drug dissolution during this period. Also, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD
356
presented very similar release profiles for up to 30 min, after which 2:8 SD demonstrated a
357
higher dissolution rate. According to Kogermann and coworkers, this deviation in the
358
dissolution behaviors in the later stages of a dissolution testing could be associated with the
359
formation of physically different diffusion layers around the drug:polymer particles, since it is
360
well known that the dissolution of the drug follows the dissolution of the polymer (Kogermann
361
et al., 2013). The values for the percentage drug release of these SDs were 91.2 ± 5.9 % (2:8
362
SD) and 78.8 ± 1.4 % (3:7 SD) at the end of the assay. These results indicate that the
363
improvement of this biopharmaceutical property was dependent on the drug:carrier ratio, the
364
best results being obtained for the SD with the highest proportion of HPMC.
365
It is also important to mention that the dissolution data for 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD were
366
within the acceptance criteria of deviation required by the United States Pharmacopoeia. This
367
means that the relative standard deviation (RSD) values at time intervals of 10 min or less were
Ac ce p
352
15 Page 15 of 28
lower than 20 %, and for longer intervals they were lower than 10 %. The fulfillment of this
369
condition is essential, since a high variability in the results can hinder the identification of
370
trends or effects resulting from changes in the formulation (USP, 2011). Also, achieving the
371
desired deviation range is even more challenging for HPMC-based formulations, since HPMC is
372
known to form hydrogels which slowly erode in aqueous solutions and can result in variability
373
among samples (Kim et al., 2006).
374
Data related to the analysis of the dissolution profiles through independent and dependent
375
methods are shown in Table 1.
376
Table 1. Dissolution efficiency (DE), period in which 50 % release of NMP occurs (t50%) and dissolution
377
rate constant (k) for SDs
cr
t50% (min) 242.73 246.23 318.88
us
DE (%) ± standard deviation 71.5 ± 0.9 59.0 ± 3.6 58.8 ± 3.7
an
Sample 1:9 SD 2:8 SD 3:7 SD
k (min-1) 16.00 12.88 12.09
M
378 379 380 381 378 382
ip t
368
Regarding the dissolution efficiency (DE), SDs increased this value considerably, since for the
384
pure drug the DE was 19.4 ± 0.6 %. Increases in this parameter by up to a factor of four were
385
noted for the formulations obtained in comparison to NMP. The release profiles were also tested
386
through different mathematical models and the best fit was observed for the Higuchi model.
387
According to this model, when exposed to the solvent, both the drug and carrier dissolve at rates
388
proportional to their solubility and diffusion coefficients in the dissolving medium. In this
389
context, the dissolution rate of the minor component may be determined by the component in
390
excess. In turn, this may be applied to solid dispersal systems by arguing that when the drug is
391
present as a minority component its dissolution will be dominated by the dissolution behavior of
392
the carrier (Corrigan, 1986; Craig, 2002; Higuchi, 1967; Higuchi, Mir & Desai, 1965).
393
The Korsmeyer-Peppas model correlates the drug release to time through a simple exponential
394
equation for a drug release fraction of < 0.6. This model has been used to evaluate the drug
395
release from polymeric devices, especially when the release mechanism is unknown or when
396
there is more than one mechanism involved (Korsmeyer, Gurny, Doelker, Buri & Peppas,
397
1983). In this context, n ≤ 0.43 indicates Fickian release and n = 0.85 indicates a purely
398
relaxation-controlled delivery which is referred to as Case II transport. Intermediate values (0.43
399
< n < 0.85) indicate an anomalous behavior, described as a non-Fickian kinetics corresponding
Ac ce p
te
d
383
16 Page 16 of 28
to coupled diffusion and polymer relaxation. Occasionally, values of n > 1 have been observed
401
which are regarded as Super Case II kinetics (Ritger & Peppas, 1987; 1987a).
402
The results obtained through the application of the Korsmeyer-Peppas model show calculated n
403
values of 2.92, 2.2 and 2.3, for 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, respectively, indicating that the
404
NMP was released via Super Case II transport. In the case of this mechanism, it is proposed that
405
the drug release involves diffusion, swelling, relaxation and erosion (Ritger & Peppas, 1987a)
406
of the polymeric component.
ip t
400
cr
407 3.5 STABILITY STUDIES
409
Stability studies on the physical state of the SDs were performed through XRPD, DSC and
410
FTIR spectroscopy. The data obtained are shown in Figures 6 and 7.
an
us
408
411
M
A
d
2:8 SD 40 \C/75 % 1:9 SD 40 \C/75 %
te Ac ce p 0
10
20
3:7 SD 40 \C/75 %
3:7 SD desiccator 2:8 SD desiccator 1:9 SD desiccator
2?
30
40
50
B
3:7 SD 40 \ C/75 % 2:8 SD 40 \ C/75 % 1:9 SD 40 \ C/75 % 3:7 SD desiccator 2:8 SD desiccator 1:9 SD desiccator
50
412
60
70
80
90 100 110 120 Temperature ( \ C)
130
140
150
17 Page 17 of 28
413
FIGURE 6
1:9 SD desiccator
ip t
2:8 SD desiccator
) % ( ec n a ti m s n a r T
cr
3:7 SD desiccator
M
an
us
1:9 SD 40 \ C/75 %
2:8 SD 40 \ C/75 %
3:7 SD 40 \ C/75 %
400
FIGURE 7
te
416
600
Ac ce p
414 415
800
d
4000 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 Wavenumber (cm-1)
417
As can be observed through XRPD data, all of the SDs remained amorphous for 90 days in a
418
desiccator. No changes were observed in the FTIR spectra, indicating the maintenance of the
419
initial interactions between the drug and carrier. These data suggest that the formulations
420
remained stable under this condition. Also, the crystallization of the sample 3:7 SD during the
421
DSC analysis was still observed and its cause was already discussed in topic 3.3.2.
422
On the other hand, distinct results were obtained when the samples were submitted to more
423
severe conditions of temperature and humidity. At 40 °C/75 % RH, only the sample 1:9 SD
424
remained amorphous, as indicated by the XRPD, DSC and FTIR spectroscopy data. The X-ray
425
diffractograms for 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD clearly indicated the recrystallization of these samples,
426
and the characteristic reflection of Mod II, at 9.3 °, was observed for the formulation 3:7 SD.
427
These data were confirmed by the DSC results and the thermal analysis also revealed the
428
polymorphic mixture of 2:8 SD. The spectroscopy analysis shows the appearance of amine
429
group bands related to crystalline NMP at 3,269 cm-1 for the samples 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD, 18 Page 18 of 28
indicating the presence of the crystalline phase Mod II (Barmpalexis, Kachrimanis &
431
Georgarakis, 2011; Tang, Pikal & Taylor, 2002).
432
Reports in the literature indicate that exposure to high humidity leads to a greater absorption of
433
moisture by the bulk structure of SDs, in addition to surface adsorption, compared to physical
434
mixtures of similar composition. This absorbed water content can induce plasticization and
435
enhance molecular mobility, thereby leading to crystallization (Ahlneck & Zografi, 1990;
436
Sakurai, Sako & Maitani, 2012; Takeuchi, Yasuji, Yamamoto & Kawashima, 2000).
437
It is well known that thermodynamically unstable systems, like amorphous systems, tend to
438
undergo recystallization to their more stable state at any given moment (Serajuddin, 1999).
439
However, various studies have demonstrated that the presence of hydrophilic carriers inhibits
440
the recrystallization of amorphous drugs (Bhugra & Pikal, 2008; Bikiaris, 2011; Leuner &
441
Dressman, 2000; Newman; Knipp & Zografi, 2012; Sethia & Squillante, 2003; Van den Mooter,
442
2012). This inhibition is generally attributed to the interaction between drug and carrier,
443
promoted mainly through hydrogen bonds, and to the dispersion of drug molecules in the
444
polymeric matrix during the preparation process (Leuner & Dressman, 2000). In the case of SDs
445
of NMP, the increase in the stability observed when the HPMC concentration was increased
446
from 70 to 90 % (w/w) was attributed to the dilution mechanism, where the drug was diluted in
447
the polymer and the diffusion pathway for crystallization increased, thereby slowing the process
448
(Bhugra & Pikal, 2008; Konno & Taylor, 2006).
449
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
430
4. CONCLUSIONS
451
SDs composed of NMP and HPMC, in different proportions, were successfully obtained
452
through ball milling and achieved the desired aims. All of the solid-state techniques
453
demonstrated that 1:9 SD, 2:8 SD and 3:7 SD were amorphous and FTIR data verified the
454
establishment of hydrogen bonding between drug and carrier.
455
biopharmaceutical properties of the API was achieved for all formulations, although the best
456
results were attributed to the sample 1:9 SD. This SD was able to improve the drug solubility by
457
up 318 % and the NMP dissolution rate by up to a factor four. In addition to promoting the best
458
performance in terms of these properties, a higher proportion of HPMC in the formulations led
459
to a greater stability of the SDs at 40 °C/75 % RH, due to a dilution mechanism. No changes
460
were noted for the SDs over 90 days of storage in a desiccator, with respect to the physical
461
characteristics. These results verify the potential of HPMC as a polymeric carrier for ball-milled
462
SDs of NMP and highlight the future perspectives for these systems, especially for the sample
Ac ce p
450
The enhancement of the
19 Page 19 of 28
463
1:9 SD, which include the obtainment of solid dosage forms and the determination of their
464
bioavailability compared with commercial formulations.
465 Acknowledgments
467
The authors acknowledge the Brazilian governmental agencies CNPq, FAPESC and CAPES for
468
student scholarships and financial support. Initial XRPD analysis was carried out at the X-ray
469
diffraction Lab (LDRX) of the Physics Department, at the Federal University of Santa Catarina
470
(UFSC). The authors also wish to thank Dr. Milton Domingues Michel from the State
471
University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG) for the SEM measurements and Dr. Siobhan Wiese for
472
revising the manuscript. Thanks are also due to the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones
473
Científicas (CSIC) in Spain, for awarding a license for the use of the Cambridge Structural
474
Database (CSD).
an
us
cr
ip t
466
475 REFERENCES
477 478 479
Adinarayana, G.; Rajendran, A. & Rao, N. K. (2010). Preparation and in vitro evaluation of solid dispersions of nimodipine using PEG 4000 and PVP K30. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care,2, 163-169.
480 481
Ahlneck, C. & Zografi, G. (1990). The molecular basis of moisture effects on the physical and chemical stability of drugs in the solid state. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 62, 87-95.
482 483 484
Alonzo, D. E.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, D.; Mo, H.; Zhang, G. G. Z. & Taylor, L. S. (2011). Dissolution and precipitation behavior of amorphous solid dispersions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 100, 33163331.
485 486 487
Anuar, N. K.; Wui, W. T.; Ghodgaonkar, D. K. & Taib, M. T. (2007). Characterization of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films using microwave non-destructive testing technique. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43, 549-557.
488 489 490
Asare-Addo, K.; Levina, M.; Rajabi-Siahboomi, A. R. & Nokhodochi, A. (2011). Effect of ionic strength and pH of dissolution media on theophylline release from hypromellose matrix tablets – Apparatus USP III, simulated fast and fed conditions. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 85-93.
491 492 493
Babu, G. V.; Prasad, C. D. S. & Ramana-Murthy, K. V. (2002). Evaluation of modified gum karaya as carrier for the dissolution enhancement of poorly water-soluble drug nimodipine. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 234, 1-17.
494 495 496
Balani, P. N.; Ng, W. K.; Tan, R. B. H. & Chan, S. Y. (2010). Influence of excipients in comilling on mitigating milling-induced amorphization or structural disorder of crystalline pharmaceutical actives. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 99, 2462-2474.
497 498 499
Barmpalexis, P.; Kachrimanis, K. & Georgarakis, E. (2011). solid dispersions in the development of a nimodipine floating tablet formulation and optimization by artificial neural networks and genetic programming. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 77, 122-131.
500 501 502
Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Valizadeh, H.; Shadbad, M. S.; Adibkia, K.; Mohammadi, G.; Farahani, A.; Arash, Z. & Nokhodchi, A. (2010). Cogrinding as an approach to enhance dissolution rate of a poorly water-soluble drug (glicazide). Powder Technology, 197, 150-158.
503 504
Bhugra, C. & Pikal, M. J. (2008). Role of thermodynamic, molecular, and kinetic factors in crystallization from the amorphous state. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 97, 1329-1349.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
476
20 Page 20 of 28
Bikiaris, D. N. (2011). Solid dispersions, part II: New strategies in manufacturing methods for dissolution rate enhancement of poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 8, 1663-1680.
507 508 509
Boldyrev, V. V.; Shakhtshneider, T. P.; Burleva, L. P. & Severtsev, V. A. (1994). Preparation of the disperse systems of sulfathiazole-polyvinylpyrrolidone by mechanical activation. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 20, 1103-1113.
510
British Pharmacopoeia. (2009). The Department of Health. London.
511 512 513
Cardoso, T. M.; Rodrigues, P. O.; Stulzer, H. K, Silva, M. A. S. & Matos, J. R. (2005). Physical-chemical characterization and polymorphism determination of two nimodipine samples deriving from distinct laboratories. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 31, 631-637.
514 515
Cilurzo, F.; Minghetti, P.; Casiraghi, A. & Montanari, L. (2002). Characterization of nifedipine solid dispersions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 242, 313-317.
516 517
Colombo, I.; Grassi, G. & Grass, M. (2009). Drug mechanochemical activation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 98, 3961-3986.
518 519
Colombo, P. (1993). Swelling-controlled release in hydrogel matrices for oral route. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 11, 37-57.
520 521 522
Corrigan, O.I. (1986). Retardation of polymeric carrier dissolution by dispersed drugs: Factors influencing the dissolution of solid dispersions containing polyethylene glycols. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 12, 1777–1793.
523 524
Craig, D. Q. M. (2002). The mechanisms of drug release from solid dispersions in water-soluble polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 231, 131-144.
525 526 527 528
Docoslis, A.; Huszarik, K. L.; Papageorgiou, G. Z.; Bikiaris, D.; Stergiou, A. & Georgarakis, A. (2007). Characterization of the distribution, polymorphism, and stability of nimodipine in its solid dispersions in polyethylene glycol by Micro-Raman spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction. The AAPS Journal, 9, E361-E370.
529 530 531
Feng, T.; Rodolfo, P. & Carvajal, M. T. (2008). Process induced disorder in crystalline materials: Differentiating defective crystals from the amorphous form of griseofulvin. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 97, 3207-3221.
532 533 534
Friedrich, H.; Nada, A. & Bodmeier, R. (2005). Solid state and dissolution rate characterization of coground mixtures of nifedipine and hydrophilic carriers. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 31, 719-728.
535 536 537
Gaisford, S.; Dennison, M.; Tawfik, M. & Jones, M. D. (2010). Following mechanical activation of salbutamol sulphate during ball-milling with isothermal calorimetry. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 393, 74-78.
538 539
Gorajana, A.; Rao, N. K. & Nee, W. Y. (2011). Physicochemical characterization and in vitro evaluation of solid dispersions of nimodipine. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23, 2857-2859.
540 541
Grunenberg, A.; Keil, B. & Henck, J. O. (1995). Polymorphism in binary mixtures, as exemplified by nimodipine. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 118, 11-21.
542 543 544
Guo, Z.; Ma, M.; Wang, T.; Chang, D.; Jiang, T. & Wang, S. (2011). A kinetic study of the polymorphic transformation of nimodipine and indomethacin during high shear granulation. AAPS PharmSciTech, 12, 610-619.
545 546
Higuchi, W.I. (1967). Diffusional models useful in biopharmaceutics. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 56, 315–324.
547 548
Higuchi, W.I.; Mir, N.A. & Desai, S.J. (1965). Dissolution rates of polyphase mixtures. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 54, 1405–1410.
549 550 551
Hu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J. & Yang, Y. (2003). Preparation and drug release behaviors of nimodipine-loaded poly(caprolactone)-poly(ethylene oxide)-polylactide amphiphilic copolymer nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 24, 2395-2404.
552 553 554
Jijun, F.; Lishuang, X.; Xiaoli, W.; Shu, Z.; Xiaoguang, T.; Xingna, Z.; Haibing, H. & Xing, T. (2011). Nimodipine (NM) tablets with high dissolution containing NM solid dispersions prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 37, 934-944.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
505 506
21 Page 21 of 28
Kalivoda, A.; Fischbach, M. & Kleinebudde, P. (2012). Application of mixtures of polymeric carriers for dissolution enhancement of fenofibrate using hot-melt extrusion. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 429, 58-68.
558 559 560
Kim, E-J.; Chun, M-K.; Jang, J-S.; Lee, I-H.; Lee, K-R & Choi, H-K. (2006). Preparation of a solid dispersion of felodipine using a solvent wetting method. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 64, 200-205.
561 562 563
Kogermann, K.; Penkina, A.; Predbannikova, K.; Jeeger, K.; Veski, P.; Rantanen, J. & Naelapää, K. (2013). Dissolution testing of amorphous solid dispersions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 444, 40-46.
564 565 566
Konno, H.; Handa, T.; Alonzo, D. E. & Taylor, L. S. (2008). Effect of polymer type on the dissolution profile of amorphous solid dispersions containing felodipine. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 70, 493-499.
567 568
Konno H. & Taylor, L. S. (2006). Influence of different polymers on the crystallization tendency of molecularly dispersed amorphous felodipine. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 95, 2692–2705.
569 570
Korsmeyer, R. W.; Gurny, R.; Doelker, E.; Buri, P. & Peppas, N. A. (1983). Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 15, 25-35.
571 572 573
Kreidel, R. N.; Duque, M. D.; Serra, C. H. R.; Velasco, M. V. R.; Baby, A. R.; Kaneko, T. M. & Consiglieri, V. O. (2012). Dissolution enhancement and characterization of nimodipine solid dispersions with Poloxamer 407 or PEG 6000. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 33, 1354-1359.
574 575 576
Ku, M. S. & Dulin, W. (2010). A biopharmaceutical classification-based Right-First-Time formulation approach to reduce human pharmacokinetic variability and project cycle time from First-In-Human to clinical Proof-Of-Concept. Pharmaceutical Development & Technology, 17, 285-302.
577 578 579
Kumar, S.; Kumar, P.; Chanderparkash, A. & Singh, S. K. (2010). Evaluation of some novel techniques for dissolution enhancement of poorly water soluble drug nimodipine. International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2, 950-959.
580 581
Leuner, C. & Dressman, J. (2000). Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 50, 47-60.
582 583 584
Li, B.; Konecke, S.; Harich, K.; Wegiel, L.; Taylor, L. S. & Edgar, K. J. (2013). Solid dispersion of quercetin in cellulose derivative matrices influences both solubility and stability. Carbohydrate Polymers, 92, 2033-2040.
585 586
Lu, J.; Wang, M.; Ding, P. & Pan, Z. (1995). Preparation and dissolution of nimodipine-PEG solid dispersion. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal,30, 23-25.
587 588 589
Mallick, S.; Pattnaik, S.; Swain, K.; De, P. K.; Saha, A.; Ghoshal, G. & Mondal, A. (2008). Formation of physically stable amorphous phase of ibuprofen by solid state milling with kaolin. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 68, 346-351.
590 591
Marsac, P. J.; Shamblin, S. L. & Taylor, L. S. (2006). Theoretical and practical approaches for prediction of drug-polymer miscibility and solubility. Pharmaceutical Research, 23, 2417-2426.
592 593
Newman, A.; Knipp, G. & Zografi, G. (2012). Assessing the performance of amorphous solid dispersions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 101, 1355-1377.
594 595
Nguyen, H. (2004). Bioequivalence reviews: ANDA 76. In Division of bioequivalence review, U. S. Food and Drug Administration.
596 597
O’Hara, T.; Dunne, A; Butler, J. & Denave, J. A. (1998). Review of methods used to compare dissolution profile data. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today, 1, 214-223.
598 599 600
Oh, M. J.; Shim, J. B.; Yoo, H.; Lee, G. Y.; Jo, H.; Jeong, S. M.; Yuk, S. H.; Lee, D. & Khang, G. (2012). The dissolution property of raloxifene HCl solid dispersion using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Macromolecular Research, 20, 835-841.
601 602 603
Oliveira, P. R.; Bernardi, L. S.; Murakami, F. S.; Mendes, C. & Silva, M. A. S. (2009). Thermal characterization and compatibility studies of norfloxacin for development of extended release tablets. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 97, 741-745.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
555 556 557
22 Page 22 of 28
Padden, B. E.; Mill, J. M.; Robbins, T.; Zocharski, P. D.; Prasad, L.; Spence, J. K. & La Fountaine, J. (2011). Amorphous solid dispersions as enabling formulations for discovery and early development. American Pharmaceutical Reviews, 1, 66-73.
607 608 609
Palermo, R. N.; Anderson, C. A. & Drennen III, J. K. (2012). Review: Use of thermal, diffraction, and vibrational analytical methods to determine mechanisms of solid dispersion stability. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovations, 7, 2-12.
610 611 612
Papadimitriou, S.; Papageorgiou, G. Z.; Kanaze, F. I.; Georgarakis, M. & Bikiaris, D. N. (2009). Nanoencapsulation of nimodipine in novel biocompatible poly(propylene-co-butylene succinate) aliphatic copolyesters for sustained release. Nanomaterials, 2009, 1 – 11.
613 614 615 616
Papageorgiou, G. Z.; Bikiaris, D.; Karavas, E.; Politis, S.; Docoslis, A.; Park, Y.; Stergiou, A. & Georgarakis, E. (2006). Effect of physical state and partice size distribution on dissolution enhancement of nimodipine/PEG solid dispersions prepared by melt mixing and solvent evaporation. The AAPS Journal, 8, E623-E631.
617 618 619
Papageorgiou, G. Z.; Docoslis, A.; Georgarakis, M. & Bikiaris, D. (2009). The effect of physical state on the drug dissolution rate: miscibility studies of nimodipine with PVP. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 95, 903-915.
620 621 622
Patterson, J. E.; James, M. B.; Forster, A. H.; Lancaster, R. W.; Butler, J. M. & Rades, T. (2007). Preparation of glass solutions of three poorly water soluble drugs by spray drying, melt extrusion and ball milling. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 336, 22-34.
623 624
Pham, A. T. & Lee, P. I. (1994). Probing the mechanisms of drug-release from hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose matrices. Pharmaceutical Research, 11, 1379-1384.
625 626
Polli, J.E.; Rekhi, G.S. & Shah, V.P. (1996). Methods to compare dissolution profiles. Drug Information Journal, 30, 1113-1120.
627 628 629
Qi, S.; Roser, S.; Edler, K. J.; Pigliacelli, C.; Rogerson, M.; Weuts, I.; Van Dycke, F. & Stokbroekx, S. (2013). Insights into the role of polymer-surfactant complexes in drug solubilisation/stabilisation during drug release from solid dispersions. Pharmaceutical Research, 30, 290-302.
630 631 632 633
Riekes, M. K.; Pereira, R. N.; Rauber, G. S.; Cuffini, S. L.; Campos, C. E. M.; Silva, M. A. S. & Stulzer, H. K. (2012). Polymorphism in nimodipine raw materials: Development and validation of a quantitative method through differential scanning calorimetry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 70, 188-193.
634 635 636
Riekes, M. K.; Rauber, G. S.; Kuminek, G.; Tagliari, M. P.; Cardoso, S. G. & Stulzer, H. K. (2013). Determination of nimodipine in the presence of its degradation products and overall kinetics through a stability-indicating LC method. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 51, 511-516.
637 638 639
Ritger, P. L. & Peppas, N. A. (1987). A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. Journal of Controlled Release, 5, 23-36.
640 641
Ritger, P. L. & Peppas, N. A. (1987a). A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. Journal of Controlled Release, 5, 37-42.
642 643
Rogers, T. L. (2009). Hypromellose. In R. C. Rowe, P. J. Sheskey & M. E. Quinn. (6th ed.), Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients (pp. 326-329). London: Pharmaceutical Press.
644 645 646
Sakurai, A.; Sako, K. & Maitani, Y. (2012). Influence of manufacturing factors on physical satbility and solubility of solid dispersions containing a low glass transition temperature drug. Chemical Pharmaceutical Bulletim, 60, 1366-1371.
647 648 649
Sathigari, S. K.; Radhakrishnan, V. K.; Davis, V. A.; Parsons, D. L. & Babu, R. J. (2012). Amorphousstate characterization of efavirenz – Polymer hot-melt extrusion systems for dissolution enhancement. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 101, 3456-3464.
650 651
Serajuddin, A. T. (1999). Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs: early promises, subsequent problems, and recent breakthroughs. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 88, 1058-1066.
652 653
Sethia, S. & Squillante, E. (2003). Solid dispersions: revival with greater possibilities and applications in oral drug delivery. Critical Review on Therapy and Drug Carrier Systems, 20, 215-247.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
604 605 606
23 Page 23 of 28
Shah, B,; Kakumanu, V. K. & Bansal, A. K. (2006). Analytical techniques for quantification of amorphous/crystalline phases in pharmaceutical solids. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 95, 16411665.
657 658 659
Shim, J. B.; Lee, J. K.; Jo, H.; Hwang, J. H.; Jeong, S. M.; Jo, J. I.; Lee, D.; Yuk, S. H. & Khang, G. (2013). Effect of acidifier on the dissolution property of a solid dispersion of raloxifene HCl. Macromolecular Research, 21, 42-48.
660 661 662
Smikalla, M. M. & Urbanetz, N. A. (2007). The influence of povidone K17 on the storage stability of solid dispersions of nimodipine and polyethylene glycol. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 66, 106-112.
663 664
Svenson, S. (2009). Dendrimers as versatile platform in drug delivery applications. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 71, 445-462.
665
Sweetman, S. C. (2009). The complete drug reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press, pp. 1357-1358.
666 667 668
Takeuchi, H.; Yasuji, T.; Yamamoto, H. & Kawashima, Y. (2000). Temperature- and moisture-induced crystallization of amorphous lactose in composite particles with sodium alginate prepared by spraydrying. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 5, 355-363.
669 670 671
Tang, X. C.; Pikal, M. J. & Taylor, L. S. (2002). Spectroscopic investigation of hydrogen bond patterns in crystalline and amorphous phases in dihydropiridine calcium channel blockers. Pharmaceutical Research, 19, 477-483.
672
The United States Pharmacopoeia Monographs. (2011). 34th ed., National Formulary 29.
673 674
Ugandhar, C. (2012). Formation and evaluation of mesalazine solid dispersion. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 5, 809-812.
675 676 677
Urbanetz, N. A. & Lippold, B. C. (2005). Solid dispersions of nimodipine and polyethylene glycol 2000: Dissolution properties and pysico-chemical characterization. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 59, 107-118.
678 679
Urbanetz, N. A. (2006). Stabilization of solid dispersions of nimodipine and polyethylene glycol 2000. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 28, 67-76.
680 681
Van den Mooter, G. (2012). The use of amorphous solid dispersions: A formulation strategy to overcome poor solubility and dissolution rate. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 9, e79-e85.
682 683
Vasconcelos, T.; Sarmento, B. & Costa, P. (2007). Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs. Drug Discovery Today, 12, 1068-1075.
684 685 686
Wegiel, L. A.; Mauer, L. J.; Edgar, K. J. & Taylor, L. S. (2013). Crystallization of amorphous solid dispersions of resveratrol during preparation and storage – Impact of different polymers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 102, 171-184.
687 688
Wu, W.; Zhou, Q. & Zhang, H. (1998). Preparation and in vitro evaluation of nimodipine solid dispersions. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 33, 29-32.
689 690 691
Yang, X.; Ke, W.; Zi, P.; Liu, F. & Yu, L. (2008). Detecting and identifying the complexation of nimodipine with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin present in tablets by Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 97, 2702-2719.
692 693
Yonemochi, E.; Sano, S.; Yoshihashi, Y. & Terada K. (2013). Diffusivity of amorphous drug in solid dispersion. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, in press.
694 695 696
Yoshida, T.; Kurimoto, I.; Yoshihara, K.; Umejima, H.; Ito, N.; Watanabe, S.; Sako, K. & Kikuchi, A. (2012). Aminoalkyl methacrylate copolymers for improving the solubility of tacrolimus. I: Evaluation of solid dispersion formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 428, 18-24.
697 698
Yunzhe, S.; Rui, Y.; Wenliang, Z. & Tang, X. (2008). Nimodipine semi-solid capsules containing solid dispersion for improving dissolution. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 359, 144-149.
699 700
Zheng, X.; Yang, R.; Tang, X. & Zheng, L. (2007). Part I: Characterization of solid dispersions of nimodipine prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 33, 791-802.
701 702 703
Zhong, L.; Zhu, X.; Luo, X. & Su, W. (2013). Dissolution properties and physical characterization of telmisartan-chitosan solid dispersions prepared by mechanochemical activation. AAPS PharmSciTech, in press.
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
cr
ip t
654 655 656
24 Page 24 of 28
704 705 FIGURE CAPTIONS
707
Fig. 1. (A) Monomeric unit of HPMC, where R represents either -H, -CH3 or –
708
CH2CH(CH3)OH; (B) chemical structure of NMP
709
Fig. 2. Calculated X-ray patterns of Mod I and Mod II and X-ray diffractograms of raw
710
materials, physical mixtures and SDs. The symbol indicates the reflection at 6.6 °,
711
characteristic of Mod I, whilst indicates the reflection at 9.3 °, which is present exclusively at
712
Mod II
713
Fig. 3. (A) DSC curves and (B) TGA curves of raw materials and SDs. In the upper right corner
714
of Fig. 3B, derivate thermogravimetric curves (DrTGA) of the samples are presented
715
Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of raw materials, physical mixture and SDs
716
Fig. 5. Release rates of () 1;9 SD, () 2:8 SD, (▲) 3:7 SD and () pure NMP in acetate
717
buffer pH 4.5 containing 0.3 % of SLS
718
Fig. 6. (A) XRPD patterns and (B) DSC curves of SDs after 90 days of stability studies at
719
different conditions. The arrow at the X-ray pattern of 3:7 SD indicates the reflection at 9.3 °,
720
characteristic of Mod II
721
Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of SDs kept 90 days at different conditions. The highlighted areas show the
722
appearance of the amine group bands respective to crystalline NMP
725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733
cr
us
an
M
d
te
724
Ac ce p
723
ip t
706
734 735 736 737 738 739 25 Page 25 of 28
740 741 APPENDIX A 0 2 1
5 , 2
NMP
0 0 1 0 8
,0 0
0
5 , -0 0
2
4
6
8
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Minutes
1:9 SD
0 0 1
2
4
6
0 0 1 0 8
0 U6 A m 0 4
U0 A6 m 0 4
0 2
0 2
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Minutes
2:8 SD
an
0 8
8
cr
,5 0
0 2
0
0
2
4
6
8
M
0
ip t
,5 1 U0 A, m1
U0 A6 m 0 4
0
HPMC
0 , 2
us
742
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Minutes
0
2
4
6
8
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Minutes
3:7 SD
0 0 1
d
0 8
te
U0 A6 m 0 4
Ac ce p
0 2 0
743 744 745
0
2
4
6
8
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Minutes
Fig. A. 1. Chromatograms referent to raw materials and SDs
26 Page 26 of 28
NMP
2:8 SD
HPMC
M
an
us
cr
ip t
1:9 SD
746 747 748
Ac ce p
te
d
3:7 SD
Fig. A. 2. Photomicrographs of raw materials and SDs
27 Page 27 of 28
748
HIGHLIGHTS Amorphous ball-milled solid dispersions of nimodipine and HPMC were developed
750
HPMC solid dispersions enhanced the biopharmaceutical properties of the drug
751
Hydrogen bonding was established between nimodipine and HPMC
752
HPMC stabilizes solid dispersions through a dilution mechanism
753
cr
754
ip t
749
Ac ce p
te
d
M
an
us
755
28 Page 28 of 28