HSC Contribution in Making Steady-State Blood

HSC Contribution in Making Steady-State Blood

Immunity Previews HSC Contribution in Making Steady-State Blood Keisuke Ito1,2,3,4,5,* and Paul S. Frenette1,2,3,4,* 1Ruth L. and David S. Gottesman ...

368KB Sizes 1 Downloads 40 Views

Immunity

Previews HSC Contribution in Making Steady-State Blood Keisuke Ito1,2,3,4,5,* and Paul S. Frenette1,2,3,4,* 1Ruth L. and David S. Gottesman Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA 2Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA 3Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA 4Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA 5Diabetes Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (K.I.), [email protected] (P.S.F.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.002

In homeostasis, whether blood cells are derived from committed progenitor or mutipotent stem cell activity remains controversial. In this issue of Immunity, Sawai et al. (2016) describe murine HSCs as the major contributor to the maintenance of multilineage hematopoiesis, both in the steady state and during cytokine response.

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is an important therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune and hematological disorders, including leukemia and aplastic anemia, and a key driver for generating new insights on stem cell behavior. Accumulating evidence from in vivo analyses of the cellular properties of various bone marrow fractions has uncovered a complex hematopoietic hierarchy, through which all hematopoietic cells, including progenitors and mature cells, are perpetually regenerated from rare and mostly quiescent HSCs in the adult bone marrow (Seita and Weissman, 2010). By definition, functional HSCs have the capacity to engraft the recipient bone marrow after transplantation. However, whether HSCs contribute to produce blood cells under steady-state conditions is unclear. In fact, recent gene-marking studies have suggested that committed progenitors could produce all circulating blood cells during homeostasis. Transposon-based cellular tracking was engineered to show the uncoupling of cellular barcodes between HSCs and granulocytes, accompanied by clonal diversity, in steady-state hematopoiesis (Sun et al., 2014). A subsequent lineage tracing study using inducible Cre recombinase also implied that a large number of longlived progenitors or short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs), rather than classically defined long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs), are the main drivers of steady-state hematopoiesis during most of adulthood (Busch et al., 2015). Technical considerations, however, might influence the conclusions

derived from these experiments. For example, clonal labeling by inducible transposon could be affected by leaky transposase expression after initial induction or the low labeling efficiency (0.5%–1% of the total HSC fraction) of the CreER inducible system, might have reduced the probability of observable HSC differentiation (Sun et al., 2014; Busch et al., 2015). In this issue of Immunity, taking advantage of the enrichment of Pdzk1ip1 (also known as Map17) expression in HSCs, Sawai et al. have developed genetic systems to label self-renewing HSCs and trace the progeny over several months (Sawai et al., 2016). During serial transplantation, HSCs expressing GFP driven by a BAC Pdzk1ip1 transgene exhibited multilineage reconstitution capacity, along with the ability to give rise to GFP-negative subsets (but not vice versa). To label and trace the Pdzk1ip1 transgene-expressing HSCs, they generated a Pdzk1ip1-CreER reporter mice crossed with a Rosa26tdTomato strain, in which the specific labeling of HSCs was confirmed within the most immature subset. While a constant frequency of labeled cells should be observed after random HSC sampling by transgene (Busch et al., 2015), the initial fraction of labeled HSCs (30%) increased 2-fold within several weeks, and finally reached 85% in 6 months to 1 year. These results thus suggest that the Pdzk1ip1 transgene labels the higher (or top) level HSC subset and that a majority of this subset is labeled with high efficiency (Figure 1).

464 Immunity 45, September 20, 2016 ª 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

The differentiation spectrum was then further assessed. Labeled HSCs rapidly contributed to committed progenitor populations in all lineages (erythroid, megakaryocytic, myeloid, common lymphoid, and early thymic T cell progenitors) and mature myeloid cells and lymphocytes (except for B-1a cells and tissue macrophages). These results suggest a major contribution of labeled HSCs to all lineages, although the contribution of HSCs to immune cell types derived from the developmental stage might be limited and might vary among tissues. Serial bone marrow biopsy showed that the labeling kinetics of multipotent progenitors (MPPs) and myeloid progenitors (MyPs) were identical and that differentiated granulocytes increased from < 3% at the outset to 70% by 1 year. Thus, the rate-limiting factor in the hierarchical model might be the transition from HSC to MPP, which is followed by rapid and linear differentiation, and this subsequent massive amplification of progenitor cells enables continuous production of large numbers of mature cells by the few cycling HSCs (Figure 1). Further, labeled HSCs were found to give rise to 70% of all myeloid cells and platelets in adult mice, and this contribution with its associated labeling kinetics, were accelerated by the induction of an interferon response. In this model, the results suggest that classically defined HSCs might serve as the ultimate source of multilineage hematopoiesis and adult immune cell development, both at the steady state and during a systemic cytokine response.

Immunity

Previews Initial labelling

Chase (steady state)

Pdzk1ip1transgene labelled cells

HSC fraction

Transition from HSCs to MPP (Rate limiting)

MPPs

Progenitors Mature cells

Figure 1. HSCs Provide Major Contribution of Steady-State Hematopoiesis HSCs to MPP (dashed line) might be the rate-limiting transition. This transition is followed by rapid and massive amplification at progenitor stages for continuous production of large numbers of mature cells (left). Pdzk1ip1-CreER transgene efficiently marks self-renewing HSC cells, and its labeling is rapidly accumulated in most of committed progenitors and mature cells during unperturbed hematopoiesis. MPP, multi-potent progenitor.

While these findings represent an important step forward in our understanding of the fundamental properties of HSCs in unperturbed animals, new questions emerge. A remaining issue is the mechanism by which Pdzk1ip1-expressing HSCs are able to exhibit superior selfrenewal capacity. In that regard, Pdzk1ip1 itself is unlikely to play a functional role in HSCs similar to that of other genetic HSC markers (e.g., CD150 and a-catulin). Although some mechanistic assays are provided, more detailed transcriptomic assessments (e.g., single cell expression data) will be needed to determine the molecular differences distinguishing Pdzk1ip1-labeled ‘‘top-level’’ HSCs from cells at the next level. Another interesting issue will be to map the location of Pdzk1ip1-labeled HSCs in the bone marrow. The microenvironment that maintains HSCs is currently the subject of intense study, where several imaging techniques have defined the spatial distribution of HSCs in the bone marrow (Kunisaki et al., 2013; Acar et al., 2015). Although Pdzk1ip1-expressing HSCs seem to lodge near sinusoidal blood vessels, most hematopoietic cells would show the same distributions since sinusoids are broadly and regularly interspersed, sandwiched by only few (i.e., 4–6) layers of cells. More extensive imaging assays for spatial distributions (e.g., arteriole versus sinusoid, perivascular versus endosteal) of Pdzk1ip1-expressing or not-expressing HSCs, both in steady-state and cytokine-stimulated hematopoiesis, will enable the identifica-

tion of the different niche types for ‘‘toplevel’’ HSCs, and will also lead to a deeper understanding of how HSCs respond to the needs of the organism. While HSCs have been identified retrospectively by clonal assays after singlecell transplantation, such assays have also demonstrated the heterogeneity of current HSC-enriched fractions (Dykstra et al., 2007). This heterogeneity has made it difficult to assess the behavior of individual HSCs, and researchers have long sought the validation of a reliable marker of individual long-term repopulating HSCs. In most of the assays the Reizis team performed, multiple Pdzk1ip1-labeled cells (e.g., 20 cells per transplantation) were used. Although molecular heterogeneity was not yet evaluated, single-cell transplantation assays have revealed that 5 out of 43 (11.6%) single Pdzk1ip1-expressing HSCs displayed multilineage hematopoietic reconstitution capacity, with 3 (7.0%) exhibiting b-type (balanced) pattern and 10 (23.3%) and 1 (2.3%) producing a (myeloid dominant) and g/d (lymphoid dominant) patterns, respectively (Dykstra et al., 2007). Pdzk1ip1-labeled fractions are thus heterogeneous, and although this method exclusively and efficiently labels superior self-renewing HSCs with minimal ‘‘leak’’ to mature cells, a majority of Pdzk1ip1-expressing cells could still be the ‘‘next-level down’’ cells. Further, Pdzk1ip1-GFPneg HSCs can also exhibit a multi-lineage repopulation capacity once transplanted, although these cells are not serially transplantable, and might correspond to inter-

mediate-term (IT) or short-term (ST) HSCs (Yamamoto et al., 2013). The establishment of more specific labeling for top- or next-level HSCs will be needed to provide a more definite picture of unperturbed hematopoiesis. Sawai et al. performed a detailed analysis of steady-state hematopoiesis in adult animals, but can the Pdzk1ip1 transgene also label HSCs during the developmental stage? The contribution kinetics of HSCs to adult hematopoiesis reflect the speed of labeling turnover (myeloid cells are quickly labeled, whereas T cell or immature B cells in bone marrow have slow labeling). The HSC contribution to fetal-derived immune cell types (e.g., B-1a cells) was found to be limited in the study by Sawai et al., consistent with the notion that plasticity toward the B-1a lineage is lost and that initially B-1a potent HSC clones become B-2 (adaptive)-restricted lymphocytes over time. B-1a cells were shown to be relatively well reconstituted in HSC fractions sorted from neonatal bone marrow at 2.5 weeks of age (Barber et al., 2011). It will therefore be interesting to explore how HSC contributions differ when labeling is induced at neonatal (and/or fetal) stages. Because Pdzk1ip1 is not expressed in human HSCs, it will also be important to dissect through other methods whether the findings from these murine models are applicable to human steady-state hematopoiesis. Recent studies using integration-site-mediated marking to track the human hematopoietic system in vivo and assess clonal dynamics during post-transplant phases have revealed that multipotent ‘‘hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells’’ provided a major sustained contribution for years (Biasco et al., 2016). Additional markers enhancing the purity of human HSCs will no doubt allow researchers to determine the roles of the top hierarchical human HSCs in native and post-transplant hematopoiesis. Although great advances over the past decade have led to the isolation highly HSC-enriched fractions, evidence of heterogeneity persists even in the most purified and rare isolates. It could be that, like us as individuals, each HSC is unique. Finding precisely the family that makes steadystate blood will be an important future challenge. Immunity 45, September 20, 2016 465

Immunity

Previews REFERENCES Acar, M., Kocherlakota, K.S., Murphy, M.M., Peyer, J.G., Oguro, H., Inra, C.N., Jaiyeola, C., Zhao, Z., Luby-Phelps, K., and Morrison, S.J. (2015). Nature 526, 126–130. Barber, C.L., Montecino-Rodriguez, E., and Dorshkind, K. (2011). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13700–13704. Biasco, L., Pellin, D., Scala, S., Dionisio, F., BassoRicci, L., Leonardelli, L., Scaramuzza, S., Baricordi, C., Ferrua, F., Cicalese, M.P., et al. (2016). Cell Stem Cell 19, 107–119.

Busch, K., Klapproth, K., Barile, M., Flossdorf, M., Holland-Letz, T., Schlenner, S.M., Reth, M., Ho¨fer, T., and Rodewald, H.R. (2015). Nature 518, 542–546. Dykstra, B., Kent, D., Bowie, M., McCaffrey, L., Hamilton, M., Lyons, K., Lee, S.J., Brinkman, R., and Eaves, C. (2007). Cell Stem Cell 1, 218–229. Kunisaki, Y., Bruns, I., Scheiermann, C., Ahmed, J., Pinho, S., Zhang, D., Mizoguchi, T., Wei, Q., Lucas, D., Ito, K., et al. (2013). Nature 502, 637–643. Sawai, C.M., Babovic, S., Upadhaya, S., Knapp, D.J.H.F., Lavin, Y., Lau, C.M., Goloborodko, A.,

Feng, J., Fujisaki, J., Ding, L., et al. (2016). Immunity 45, this issue, 597–609. Seita, J., and Weissman, I.L. (2010). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2, 640–653. Sun, J., Ramos, A., Chapman, B., Johnnidis, J.B., Le, L., Ho, Y.J., Klein, A., Hofmann, O., and Camargo, F.D. (2014). Nature 514, 322–327. Yamamoto, R., Morita, Y., Ooehara, J., Hamanaka, S., Onodera, M., Rudolph, K.L., Ema, H., and Nakauchi, H. (2013). Cell 154, 1112– 1126.

CD8+ T Cells and cART: A Dynamic Duo? Gaurav D. Gaiha1 and Bruce D. Walker1,2,3,* 1Ragon

Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 02815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.003 2Institute

A new macaque study by Cartwright et al. (2016) suggests that CD8+ T cells could play a previously unrecognized role in the suppression of HIV-1 during ongoing antiretroviral therapy. Although they are unable to eradicate infection, the antiviral role of CD8+ T lymphocytes during chronic infection has been well established. HIV-specific CD8+ T cells can be detected within days after acute infection, and their emergence coincides with a decline in plasma viremia (Koup et al., 1994; Ndhlovu et al., 2015). The importance of these cells to viral control is most directly shown in rhesus macaques infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the monkey equivalent of HIV, where antibody-mediated depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes during untreated infection leads to a rapid rise in plasma viremia, which subsequently declines after CD8+ reconstitution (Schmitz et al., 1999). Much less clear, however, is the potential contribution of CD8+ T cells to viral control in the setting of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). The advent of cART regimens that can achieve potent suppression of viremia in the SIV macaque model of AIDS viral infection has now made this an addressable question. In this issue of Immunity, Cartwright et al. (2016) provide tantalizing ex-

perimental data with possible broad implications suggesting that CD8+ T lymphocytes could play an important role in enhancing viral control under cART. Using a classical reductionist approach—similar to the aforementioned SIV studies—the authors evaluated the effect of CD8+ T lymphocyte depletion in 13 cART-treated rhesus macaques. The animals were acutely infected with a pathogenic SIV strain and 8 weeks later were administered a potent four-drug cART regimen consisting of Tenofovir, Emtricitabine, Raltegravir, and Darunavir for a period ranging from 8 to 32 weeks. Treatment resulted in substantial but varying levels of viral suppression in this early phase of infection, which the authors designated as persistent suppression (n = 7, four consecutive time points with viremia below 60 copies/mL), intermittent suppression (n = 5, a combination of undetectable and very low levels of viremia), or persistent viremia (n = 1, in which viremia was reduced but never became undetectable). All animals achieved >99.97% reduction in viral load during the treatment period and were subse-

466 Immunity 45, September 20, 2016 ª 2016 Elsevier Inc.

quently administered a single dose of a CD8-depleting antibody while remaining on cART. The animals were then monitored weekly for viral replication, CD8+ T cell count, CD4+ T cell count, and SIV DNA+ CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood, lymph node, and rectal tissue until week 8 after antibody administration, when necropsy was performed. In all animals, depletion of CD8+ T cells indeed led to a statistically significant, albeit modest, rebound in plasma viremia in the range of 102–104 RNA copies/mL despite ongoing cART (Figure 1). There was no direct correlation between preand post-depletion viral loads, but the intermittent suppressors had more consistent levels of detectable plasma viremia post-depletion than did the persistent suppressors. Furthermore, in the macaque in which cART was the least effective, the plasma viral load reached the highest post-depletion value of >105 RNA copies/mL, whereas in the persistent suppressor with the most effective cART (i.e., no detectable viremia even by ultrasensitive viral load assay), viral rebound peaked at the