Vol. 33, No. 1, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
HUMAN HL-A TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS: SEPARATION OF MOLEKXrLESCARRYING DIFFERENT IMMUNOLOCICAL SPFXXFlCITIES DETERMINED BY D. A. L. Davies,
J. Colombani,
D. C. Viza,*
SINGLE GENOTYPE
A
and J. Dausset
Searle Research Laboratories, High Wycombe, England and Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies du Sang, Hepita St. Louis, Paris, France.
ReceivedAugust19,
1968
The HL-A genetic a primary In this arated
role
locus
in tissue
graft
paper we show that by
DEAE-Sephsdex
immunological
For H-2 antigens sygous animals)
determinants
and its
fractions
that
individual
carrying
phenotypic
products
and the H-2 transplantation
autolytically
play
can be sep-
different
antigens
retarded
HL-A
1967).
methods but yields for detailed
excluded
Further
are very analysis.
is not yet known in what part
The soluble
bromelin
or
preparations, fractions
can be achieved
small and insufficient
by
pure material
The best preperatione of the molecules
1968%).
can be solubil-
and included
purification
similar
5 to 14 in homo-
of the enzymes ficin,
1966; Davies,
fraction.
(from
(Davies,
H-2 antigens
or by the addition
and Davies,
are remarkably
a selection
G2OG Sephadex, give H-2 inactive
has been obtained but it
different
from a single
of about 28 known specificities.
and an H-2 active
teins
sntigene
antigens
Hamburger and Mathe', 1968).
(Dausset,
each genotype determines
papain (Nathenson
conventional
leucocyte
determinants.
to the mouse H-2 locus
run through
rejection
HL-A
into
This complex locus
ised either
in man determines
are glycopro-
the immunological
reside.
Human HL-A antigens
* Attache/ de recherohe
have been found to behave in the same way as mouBe
‘B 1'I.N.S.E.R.M.
88
Vol. 33, No. 1,1968
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
H-2 antigens, the degree of similarity genetic homolgoues (Davies, Viza, stone, Viza,
suggesting that they are likely
Colombani and Dausset, 1967; Davies, Man-
Colombani and Dausset, 1968).
someH-2 specificities
to be
Mouse studies have revealed that
can be separated from one another by gel filtration
(Shimada and Nathenson, 1967) and also by DEA?Iion exchange chromatography (Davies, 1968b_). By the latter
method nearly all
of the eleven H-2 antigens
of one mouseH-2 genotype can be separated (Summerell and Davies, 1968).
MATWIALS AND MMTHODS Fresh normal humanspleens were used and antigens were extracted solubilized
as already described (Davies, 1966; Davies et.
results below were obtained with autolytic erial
preparations.
1968).
The
Crude soluble mat-
was passed through G200 Sephsdex and the retarded fraction
centrated
and
pooled, con-
in the cold under reduced pressure, dialysed and freeze dried.
For
examination on DEAEcolumns, material was dissolved in and dialysed against starting
buffer
(0.05 M Tris,
pH8) and in the case quoted (spleen number 18)
59 mg in 10 ml was placed on a column 125 cm x run to 0.05 M Tris, 5
ml
4.5
fractions ml
cm. A linear
pH9 + 0.35 M NaCl over a volume of 1000 ml.
were collected,
of each freeze dried.
physiological
1.5
salt solution
of cytotoxicity
These were reconstituted
in 0.9
ml
1968).
tion were tested; each fraction
of buffered
and stored at -70'.
induced by isoantisera
blue exclusion method, or by inhibition (Davies et.
Two hundred
each dialysed against 0.01 M NH4HC03and
Fractions were tested for HL-A immunological specificities inhibition
gradient was
of platelet
For the latter,
for inhibition
serial
and measuredby the trypan complement fixation
dilutions
of the cytotoxic
either by
of each column frac-
reaction
a fixed dose of
was used and the extent of combination with antibody assessed
as percentage of surviving
target
cells
89
(peripheral
lymphocytes).
Vol. 33, No. 1, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
The spleen donor was typed for HL-A specificities *1
3
4
5
6
7
10
8
-+-++++-
as follows:
11
12
14
16
-
-
-
+
RESULTS The results clarity.
exe shown in Fig. 1, separated into parts (a) and (b) for
For economy, regions of the columns were checked where mouseH-2
antigens would have been expected if H-2 material had been run. the positions
of the HL-A antigens in the predicted places and all
tions were then tested to confirm negative reactions the clear separation of two antigens, serum Wo"),
coincident
other fracFSg. 1% shows
HL-A.16 and one unknown (detected with
the two peaks being centred on tubes 131 and 104 respectively.
These positions Specificity
elsewhere.
This revealed
are reflected
5 (an allele
in a more complex fashion in Fig. lg.
of the HL-A second sublocus) appears mainly in a peak
with HL-A.16 (en allele
of the HL-A first
sublocus) but with a
smaller peak at tube 104; there is also a possible smaller peak at 113 (but one tube only) and a shoulder at tubes 117-121. specificity,
('*Juivt),
but in addition,
Another serum of unknown HL-A
also shows a major component coincident
with antigen 16
may have lesser components corresponding to the minor compon-
ents shownby the specificity tested qualitatively,
Reaction with antiserum to HL-A.6,
is shown by the shaded area and again covers
both main antigen positions, as for the other specificities a serum anti HL-A.l,
5 reaction.
the area of
being negative from tubes 1 to 95 and 141 to 200 Tubes were tested for reactivity
tested.
a specificity
with
the donor did not possess, and no reactions
were found.
* Nomenclature is that of Dausset, Ivanyi, Colombani, Peingold and Legrand (1967). Two of the antisera for which there are alternative terms are: GA.5 = 4' (Payne) = To.5 (Ceppellini) = 6 (Terasaki). HL-A.16 = Lc.11 (Walford).
90
Vol. 33, No. 1, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
l-
a 30- LI
-51
- 6(
-7(
b
i
I
I
100 TUBE
1
110 120 NUMBERS
0 J20:
I
130
Fig. 1. Human soluble HL-A transplantation antigen examined on DEB-Sephadex A50 (linear salt gradient), center section shown. Tube numbers are for 5 ml Tests for different HGA specificities of the original spleen fractions. donor have been plotted on arbitrary scales. (a) Reaction with serum “MO”, Reaction with serum anti-HL-A.16, W V, (cytotoxicity inhibition). (platelet complement fixation inhibition). Shaded area is the extent of qualitative reaction with serum anti-I&-A.6, (inhibition of oytotoxioity). (b) Reaction with serum anti-HL-A.5, o----O, and reaction with HL-A antiserum rrJuill , W, (both by platelet complement fixation inhibition). Protein profile (280 w absorbence), dotted line. The protein Rig. li
profile
from tubes
the antigen
positions
(by 280 w absorption)
80 to 155.
There are protein
in the region
of serological
91
is shown by the dotted peaks coinciding reactivity.
with
line
in
each of
Vol.
33,No.
1, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The separation
of different
HL-A specificities
DEAE columns enhances the idea of genetic Two main positions with
serum anti
are indicated
HL-A.5.
positions
but exact coincidence
ificities
of a given H-2 genotype
The interpretation
monospecific.
e.g.
(Summerell
usually
all
almost
with
means that
is that few of the available
Antiserum HL-A.6 reacts over
on
one of these spec-
and Davies,
by a reaction
monospecific and the HL-A.5 antiserum used may recognise antigen.
with
In the mouse
are separable
In the mouse this
positions
the mouse H-2 system.
peaks appear to coincide
peaks revealed
The probability
separate
by the two components detected
is not claimed.
of multiple
serum is not yet clear.
homology with
so far,
The other
into
more
1968).
a single
anti-
the serum is not
HL-A antisera are than one HL-A
the extent of both positions defined in
Fig. l_a and might have resolved into two (or more) peaks if it had been possible to test dilutions
of each fraction
in that
system.
Correspondence of protein and antigen peaks is suggestive that the antigens themselves may be revealed in the protein ature to attach significance
to this until
Failure of any fractions as a specificity
control;
more
profile
but it would be prem-
data have accumulated.
to. react with the antibody HL -A.1 (M ac) serves
antigen 1 was not present in the original
donor, but only other alleles
of the HL-A first
spleen
sublocus (e.g. HL-A-16).
There is no suggestion thus far that the two main peaks represent separations of antigens determined by the two main HL-A subloci that have recently
been
defined (Dausset, Walford, Colombani, Legrand, Feingold and Rapaport, 1968). The importance of establishing systems
the similarity
of humanHL-A and
mouse
is that experimental work can be carried out in the mousewhere human
studies are impossible and the importance of humantissue transplantation quires the information
that
mice
are separable may have different cell stimulation tolerance
H-2
for.matching
may
possibly provide.
biological (Viza,
properties
Thus antigens that e.g. of immunogenicity,
Degani, Dausset, and Davies, 1968)
induction.
92
re-
or
Vol. 33, No. 1, 1968
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It
is a pleasure to thank our assistants
J. Manstone, Mr. V. Baugh, Miss Barbara Alkins, Degani, Mlle. Catherine Dehay and Mrs. Christine
for excellent
support, m. A.
Mrs. Sue Buckham, Mile. Ora Brittin.
REFERENCES Dausset, J., Hamburger, J. and Mathg, G., '*Advance in Transplantation*', Munksgaard, Copenhagen, (1968). Dausset, J., Ivanyi, P., Colombani, .I., Feingold, J. and Legrand, L., in "Histocompatibility Testing 1967", ed. Curtoni, E. S., Mattiuz, P. L. and Tozi, R. M. p. 194. Munksgaard, Copenhagen(1967). Dausset, J., Walford, R. L., Colombani, J., Legrand, L., Feingold, N. and Rapaport, F. T., 2nd Int. Congr. Transplantation Sot., New York, in press (1968).
Davies, D. A. L., Immunology, 11, 115 (1966). 2, 31 (1967). Davies, D. A. L., Transplantat&, ed. Rapaport, F. T. and Dausset, Davies, D. A. L., in "HumanTransplantation'*, J. Chap. 38. Grune and Stratton, New York (1968~). Davies, D. A. L., in "Advance in Transplantation", ed. Dausset, J., Hamburger, 5. and Mathe, G. p. 275. Munksgaard, Copenhagen(1968k). Davies, D. A. L., Colombani, J., Viza, D. C. and Dausset, J., in "Histocompatibility Testing 1967", ed. Curtoni, E. S., Mattiuz, P. L., and Tozi, R. M. p. 287, Munksgaard, Copenhagen(1967). Davies, D. A. L., Manstone, A. J., Viza, D. C., Colombani, J. and Dausset, J., Transplantation, 6, No. 4 (1968). Nathenson, S. G. and Davies, D. A. L., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2, 6 (1966); Proo. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2, 476 (1966). Shimada, A. and Nathenson, S. G., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 29, 828 (1967). Summerell, J. M. and Davies, D. A. L., 2nd Int. Congr. Transplantation Sot., New York, in press (1968). Viza, D. C., Degani, O., Dausset, J. and Davies, D. A. L., Nature, 2, 704
(1968).
93