Human tumor cell lines express low levels of oncomodulin

Human tumor cell lines express low levels of oncomodulin

Vol. 169, No. June 29, 1990 3, 1990 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages 905-909 HUMAN TUMOR CELL LINES EXPRESS LOW...

755KB Sizes 0 Downloads 120 Views

Vol.

169,

No.

June

29,

1990

3, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

Pages

905-909

HUMAN TUMOR CELL LINES EXPRESS LOW LEVELS OF ONCOMODULIN S. Huber, M. Leuthold’, E.W. Sommei and C.W. Heizmann” Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Chemistry, University of Zi.irich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland ‘Laboratory of Oncology, University Hospital, Zurich , Switzerland ‘Institute of Toxicology, ETH-Zurich, CH-8603 Schwerzenbach , Switzerland Received

May 14,

1990

Different human carcinoma cell lines were screened for the presence of Ca’+-binding oncomodulin. A specific polyclonal antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide (amino acids 99-l 08) of oncomodulin coupled to hemocyanin. Extracts of tumor cell lines (several human, one rat) were analyzed for the presence of oncomodulin by immunoblotting. A strong immunoreaction of oncomodulin was obtained in chemically transformed rat fibroblasts (T14c) in contrast to all human tumor cell lines investigated, where no immunoreaction was obtained. These results suggest that oncomodulin cannot be used in diagnostics of human tumors. 0 1990Academic Press,Inc. Oncomodulin belongs to the family of Ca*+-binding EF-hand proteins with highest sequence homology to pan/albumin (1). Oncomodulin was first detected in neoplastic liver and isolated from rat Morris hepatomas (2, 3). It was found in other rodent tumors, but never in normal fetal and adult tissues with the exception of placenta, where it is present in extraembryonic membranes. Based on these data, oncomodulin was suggested to be a valuable tool in tumor diagnostics. To test this hypothesis we raised polyclonal antibodies against a synthetic peptide, representing the C-terminus of oncomodulin and screened human tumor cell lines of different origin for the presence of oncomodulin and compared the oncomodulin levels with those in chemically transformed rat fibroblasts (T14c). MATERIAL AND METHODS Buffalo rats bearing Morris hepatoma 5123tc were obtained from Dr Slaughter, Howard University, Washington DC, USA. Tumors of 30-509 were dissected free of necrotic tissue and stored at -80°C before protein extraction (4). T14c cells were kindly supplied by J.K. Blum (4, 5). The human tumor cell lines

“To whom correspondence should be addressed. 0006-291XBO

905

$1.50

Copyright 0 I990 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

BIOCHEMICAL

Vol. 169, No. 3, 1990

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

were grown in RPM1 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1mM Lglutamine and antibiotics. Confluent cells were trypsinized and washed twice with cold PBS. After centrifugation, the cell pellet was stored at -70°C. Oncomodulin was isolated from rat Morris hepatomas as previously described (3, 6) with minor modifications. The final purification steps were carried out on HPLC using a C,-reverse phase column and a Tris/EGTA buffer system (7) followed by separation on the same column with 0.1% (v/v) trffluoroacetic acid (buffer A) and 90% acetonitrile in buffer A (buffer B). Gradient and flow conditions were as previously described (7). Oncomodulin eluted at 45% buffer B and its amino acid composition was identical to previously published data (8). A synthetic peptide consisting of the C-terminus of rat oncomodulin (amino acids 99-l 08) was coupled via a 8-malein-imido-propionyl-group to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. A rabbit was immunized with 1 mg of this conjugate and complete Freund adjuvans, and 13 booster injections with conjugate (1 mg each time) and incomplete Freund adjuvans were given at 3-4 weeks intervals. The anti-serum gave a titer of 1 :lOOO with 10 ng antigen when tested with the dot immunobinding assay (9). The anti-serum was affinity-purified on an Affi-Prep 10 column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) to which the synthetic peptide was coupled. Cross-reactivity of the anti-serum was checked by immunoblotting (10) against other Ca”-binding proteins such as rat muscle parvalbumin, rat testis calmodulin, bovine brain S-100 proteins and recombinant rat brain calbindin D28K (11). Twenty millions of cells of each cell line were extracted in 0.5ml of extraction buffer (20mM Tris-HCI pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl-fluoride, 0.1% (v/v) 2-mercapto-ethanol), heat-treated (10 min, 85°C) and centrifuged (10’000 x g, 15 min). The supernatant was analyzed for oncomodulin by immunoblotting and HPLC. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bio Radprotein assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Proteins and cell extracts were separated on Tricine-SDS-polyacrylamide gels in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol (12). Proteins were visualized with Coomassie blue R-250. lmmunoblots were incubated with anti-oncomodulin serum (diluted 1:500) and developed with 4-chloronaphthol and H,O, (10). Prestained molecular weight markers (low range, bovine serum albumin 84 kD, ovalbumin 47 kD, bovine carbonic anhydrase 33 kD, soybean ttypsin inhibitor 24 kD, lysozyme 16 kD from Bio-Rad Laboratories) were used. RESULTS

AND DISCUSSION

Most studies were performed on rat oncomodulin were made to investigate oncomodulin is important

in human tumor diagnostics

and only a few attempts

in human tumors. However, if oncomodulin it should be present in sizeable amounts in

human tumor cell lines. The purification

of considerable

amounts of oncomodulin

from human solid

tumors and from first trimester human placenta according to published for rat tumors failed. No human oncomodulin oncomodulin

peak corresponding

procedures

to rat

was obtained on HPLC (data not shown). This was the first indication

that the level of oncomodulin A specific polyclonal

in human must be much lower than in rat. antibody against a synthetic peptide of rat oncomodulin

coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin

was prepared. The C-terminus 906

(amino acids

Vol.

169, No. 3, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

99-108) of rat oncomodulin

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

was chosen because of the greatest possible difference

of this sequence from rat and human parvalbumins. immunoblotting parvalbumin,

for cross-reactivity calmodulin,

against other Ca2’-binding

S-100 proteins, calbindin

reacted only against rat oncomodulin The anti-serum

The anti-serum

(M,=l2

was tested by

proteins, such as

D28K (Fig. 1). The anti-serum

kD).

was used to screen by immunoblotting

18 human carcinoma

cell lines of different origin (Fig. 2 and Table 1). None of these human cell extracts showed an oncomodulin

signal.

In contrast, the transformed

expresses a high amount of oncomodulin

rat cell line (T14c)

(Fig. 2, lane 7). Only two of the human

cell lines (SW2 and ZL5) are shown as an example (Fig. 2, lanes 1,4 and lanes 2,5). There was no signal at the site of oncomodulin bands in lane 4 and 5 disappeared Detailed examination

when using the affinity-purified

T14c cell line was submitted

However, when an extract of the

to HPLC, a prominent

observed and reacted with the anti-serum all examined

antibody.

of the human cell extracts by reverse phase HPLC showed

no peak eluting at the position of oncomodulin.

hydrophobicity

(Mp12 kD) and the faint

oncomodulin

peak was

(data not shown). A large difference in

between human and rat oncomodulin Ca2+-binding proteins (parvalbumin,

is not expected, since so far

S-100 proteins, calmodulin,

calcyclin) of various species did not show a large variation in hydrophobicity.

01

1

12345678

2

34567

Fig. 1: The affinity-purified rat oncomodulin antibody is tested against other Ca’+-binding proteins. 1 D-SDS-PAGE stained with Coomassie blue (lanes l-5) and corresponding immununoblot (lanes 6-10). Lane 1,6: S-100 proteins (2.5 pg); lane 2,7: parvalbumin (3 pg); lane 3, oncomodulin (3 pg); lane 4,9: calmodulin (10 Kg); lane 510: calbindin D28K (5pg). Molecular weight markers are indicated on the left by arrowheads, from top to bottom: 64 kD, 47 kD, 33 kD, 24 kD and 16 kD. OM, oncomodulin (M,=l2 kD). Fig. 2: Extracts of human carcinoma cell lines and rat Tl4c cells. 1 D-SDS-PAGE (lanes 1-3) and immunoblot (lanes 4-7). Lanes 1,4: human tumor cell line SW2 (100 pg); lanes 2,5: human tumor cell line ZL5 (100 kg); lanes 3,6: purified rat oncomodulin (0.5, 2 pg) and lane 7: rat Tl4c cell-extract (50 pg). Molecular weight markers are indicated by arrowheads as in Fig. 1. 907

Vol. 169, No. 3, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS TABLE 1: Human carcinoma cell lines Name

Origin

Ref.

ZL5 ZL 34 SPC 212 SPC 111 SLC 52 A 427 A 549 Calu 3 Calu 6 Calu 1 Hotz U 1752 SW2 NCI-H 249 NCI-H 526 NCI-N 417

Mesothelium I II I) Adenocarcinoma I 11 n II Squamous I 11 SCLC” SCLC classical SCLC variant 11

15 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 20 20 21 22 17 23 23 23

“SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

Our antibody therefore

was raised against a synthetic

it may not recognize

since the human sequence except that Glul 00 stands The concentration

peptide of rat oncomodulin,

the human counterpart.

(amino acids 99-108)

However

is identical to that of the rat

for Asp1 00 (D. Banville, personal of oncomodulin

this is unlikely

communication).

in human tumor cell lines is estimated

to

be at least 100 times lower than in the rat T14c cell line or in rat solid tumors. Therefore

oncomodulin

Our results

is not suitable as a marker

are sustained

gene of oncomodulin

in human tumor diagnostics.

by recently published

data, indicating

is under the control of a strong LTR promotor

raise to the high concentration in human and in mouse,

of rat oncomodulin.

explaining

This promoter

its much lower expression

that the rat

which gives element is absent

in these species

(13,

14). In future studies oncomodulin

it might be interesting,

in prenatal development,

already shortly

after fertilization

however,

to study the role of

since this protein is expressed

(in the rat)

(24).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported 9409.88),

EMDO-Stiftung,

Hartmann

Miiller-Stiftung

League (FOR 337.87.2).

by the Swiss

National Science Foundation

Geigy-Jubilaums-stiftung, fiir medizinische

Krebsliga

Forschung

We thank Dr. Gillessen, 908

des Kantons

and the Swiss

Hoffmann-La

(31Zurich,

Cancer

Roche, Basel, for

Vol.

169,

No.

3, 1990

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

the synthesis and coupling of the oncomodulin-peptide. Ursi Hiiriimann,

Erika Kijmin and Luisa Resenterra

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

The technical assistance of is acknowledged.

REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.

MacManus, J.P., Brewer, L.M. and Gillen, M.F. (1987) in: The Role of Calcium in Biological Systems (Anghileri, L.J., ed.) vol. 4A, 1-19, CRC Press, Boca Raton. MacManus, J.P. (1979) Cancer Res. 39, 3000-3009. MacManus, J.P. (1980) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 621, 296-304. Sommer, E.W. and Heizmann, C.W. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 899-905. Sommer, E.W., Blum, J.K., Berger, M.C. and Berchtold, M.W. (1989) FEBS Lett. 257, 307-310. Klee, C.B. and Heppel, L.A. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 125, 420-424. Pfyffer, G.E., Haemmerli, G. and Heizmann, C.W. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 6623-6636. MacManus, J.P., Watson, D.C. and Yaguchi, M. (1983) Eur. J. Biochem. 136, 9-17. Hawkes, R., Niday, E. and Gordon, J. (1982) Anal. Biochem. 119, 142-147. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350-4354. Pinol, M.R., Kagi, U., Heizmann, C.W., Vogel, B., Sequier, J-M., Haas, W. and Hunziker, W. (1990) J. Neurochem., in press. Schaegger, H. and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-370. Banville, D. and Boie, Y. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 207, 481-490. Furter, C.S., Heizmann, C.W. and Berchtold, M.W. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18276-l 8279. Established in R.A. Stahel’s Laboratory, University Hospital Zurich, manuscript in preparation. Stahel, R-A., O’Hara, C.J., Waibel, R. and Alexander, A. (1988) Int. J. Cancer 41, 212-223. Stahel, R.A., Speak, J.A. and Bernal, S.D. (1985) Int. J. Cancer 35, 11-17. Giard, D.J. (1973) J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 51, 1417-1423. Lieber, M., Smith, B., Szakal, A., Nelson-Rees, W. and Todaro, G. (1976) Int. J. Cancer 17, 62-70. Fogh, J. and Trempe, G. (1975) in: Human Tumor Cells in vitro (Fogh, J., ed.), 115-l 59, Plenum Press, New York. Peter, H.J. and Kistler, G.S. (1979) Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. 109, 830832. Bergh, J., Nilsson, K., Zech, L. and Giovanella, B. (1981) Anticancer Res. 1, 317-322. Carney, D.N., Gazdan, A.F., Bepler, G., Guccion, J.G., Marangos, P.J., Moody, T.W., Zweig, M.H. and Muina, J.D. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 29132923. MacManus, J.P. and Brewer, L.M. (1990) in: Calcium Binding Proteins in Normal and Transformed Cells (Pochet, R., Lawson, D.E. and Heizmann, C.W., eds.) Plenum Press, New York, in press.