Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: Case Report and Review of Literature

Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: Case Report and Review of Literature

Journal Pre-proof Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS): Case Report and Review of Literature Luc...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 65 Views

Journal Pre-proof Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS): Case Report and Review of Literature Luca Garriboli, MD, Tommaso Miccoli, MD, Isacco Damoli, MD, Roberto Rossini, MD, Carlo Alberto Sartori, MD, Giacomo Ruffo, MD, Antonio Maria Jannello, MD PII:

S0890-5096(19)30747-2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.077

Reference:

AVSG 4610

To appear in:

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Received Date: 22 May 2019 Revised Date:

30 July 2019

Accepted Date: 4 August 2019

Please cite this article as: Garriboli L, Miccoli T, Damoli I, Rossini R, Sartori CA, Ruffo G, Jannello AM, Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS): Case Report and Review of Literature, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.avsg.2019.08.077. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

1

Hybrid Laparoscopic and Endovascular Treatment for Median Arcuate

2

Ligament Syndrome (MALS): Case Report and Review of Literature

3 4

Authors: Luca Garriboli MD, Tommaso Miccoli MD, Isacco Damoli MD, Roberto Rossini* MD,

5

Carlo Alberto Sartori* MD, Giacomo Ruffo* MD, Antonio Maria Jannello MD.

6

Affiliations: Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar (Vr),

7

Italy, *Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar (Vr), Italy

8

Sources of financial support: XX

9

Prior Presentations: XX

10

Acknowledgements: XX

11 12

Corresponding author:

13

Luca Garriboli

14

Department: U.O. Vascular Surgery

15

Institution, IRCCS SacroCuore-Don Calabria

16

Address: Via Don SempreBoni 5

17

Zip Code, Town: 37024 Negrar (Verona)

18

Country: Italy

19

E-mail: [email protected]

20 21

ABSTRACT

22

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) is a rare cause of chronic gastrointestinal ischemia

23

caused by compression of median arcuate ligament (MAL) on celiac trunk (CT). A 38 year-old

24

male presented at our Institution with unspecific crampy abdominal pain. After several diagnostic

25

exams, he firstly underwent arcuate ligament resection by laparoscopic approach and two months

26

later percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stenting of the stenotic vessel. Post-

27

operatory and follow-up controls showed regular patency of the artery with fully relief of abdominal

28

symptoms. We propose a revision of Literature on this uncommon condition describing different

29

surgical approaches.

30

Keywords: Stenosis; Median Arcuate Ligament; Stenting; Laparoscopic treatment; Celiac Trunk

31

32

INTRODUCTION

33

Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome (MALS) is a rare cause of chronic gastrointestinal ischemia

34

(1). Anatomically, median arcuate ligament is a muscular-fibrous structure which connects the left

35

and right diaphragmatic crux on both sides of the aortic hiatus (2). Occasionally, this ligament may

36

have an intimate relationship with the celiac trunk and may cause a focal indentation. This

37

syndrome occurs typically in young slim woman (20 to 40 years old). The celiac stenosis may

38

present as an incidental finding or may be symptomatic, causing nausea, vomit, weight loss, post-

39

prandial pain in the epigastrium or after exercise (3). The gold standard for diagnosis is catheter

40

angiography performed during inspiration and expiration, although nowadays this procedure is

41

currently replaced by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and CT-angiography.

42

Typically, a “hook like” appearance of the celiac artery is seen. Controversies still exist about

43

several aspects of the syndrome, including pathophysiologic origin of the symptoms, diagnosis and

44

optimal surgical strategies (4). Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome requires treatment only in

45

symptomatic patients. Decompression of the celiac trunk can be achieved by cleavage of the median

46

arcuate ligament with a laparoscopic approach; alternative methods, such as percutaneous

47

transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the celiac trunk, can also be performed.

48 49

CASE REPORT

50

A 38 year-old male without any prior significant surgical history (except for laparoscopic

51

cholecystectomy) presented with unspecific crampy abdominal pain that occurred 30 minutes to 1

52

hour after eating and usually located in the right mid-abdomen. Pain had a severity of 8/10 with no

53

relieving factors. The patient experienced 6-8 kilograms weight loss in the last three months. All

54

laboratory testing results were normal as well as abdominal ultrasonography. He firstly underwent

55

esophagus-stomach X-Ray exam that was normal and then esophagus-gastro-duodenoscopy that

56

highlighted the presence of a pair of small erosions in the distal part of the esophagus, without

57

lesions in the gastric mucosa and in the first part of duodenum. He was discharged after 2 days of

58

hospitalization with the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. After 2 months he presented at the

59

Emergency Department of our Institution with persistent abdominal pain and weigh loss of other 3

60

kilograms. He was hospitalized and underwent Angio-Computed Tomography (CTA) of abdomen

61

which revealed antral and duodenal bulb thickening and a focal stenosis of the origin of the celiac

62

axis, with the vessel demonstrating a hook like appearance on the sagittal view with a 80% stenosis

63

arising 5 mm from the origin of celiac trunk and extending 8 mm in length due to an extrinsic

64

compression induced by median arcuate ligament (Fig.1). The patient underwent a standard work-

65

up, which involved evaluation by a multidisciplinary team including vascular surgery, general

66

surgery and gastroenterologist. In order to remove the extrinsic compression of the CA, the patient

67

was submitted to arcuate ligament resection and a laparoscopic approach was preferred. He was

68

positioned supine on the operating table with lower extremities abducted. The table was in an anti-

69

Trendelenburg position and carbon dioxide was insufflated into the peritoneal cavity to a pressure

70

of 12 mmHg. The first 10 mm Trocar for the camera was introduced in the midline about 12 cm

71

below the xiphoid process of the sternum. After a thorough inspection of the whole peritoneal

72

cavity under the control of the vision, the remaining trocars were inserted: 5 mm in the right

73

hypochondrium, 5 mm in left hypochondrium, 5 mm in the left side and 5 mm under xiphoidal

74

process. After inspection throughout the peritoneal cavity, the pars flaccida of the hepato-gastric

75

ligament was cut, revealing the left crus of the diaphragm. The CT and compressing ligament were

76

exposed. The MAL was cut with a harmonic scalpel, which resulted in immediate filling with blood

77

and increased diameter of the vessel. Patient was discharged on third postoperative day in good

78

conditions. Two months later he continued referring not fully relief of symptoms, especially post-

79

prandial abdominal pain, which have been decreased after laparoscopic release of the MAL but was

80

still present and was associated to a stab pain in epigastrium during deep breathing. The patient was

81

hospitalized for the third time, a CT scan showed a partial improvement of the stenosis though still

82

present (Fig.2). A selective catheter angiography of the abdominal aorta and visceral vessels both

83

during inspiration and expiration was performed. A left brachial artery approach was used and a 6

84

Fr introducer sheath was placed according to the Seldinger method. A Terumo guidewire was

85

advanced first in the descending thoracic aorta and a 5 Fr diagnostic Pigtail catheter was used to

86

perform angiography of the abdominal aorta. The exam confirmed the presence of a residual severe

87

stenosis 5 mm after the origin of the CT with an extension of 8 mm and the presence of a post-

88

stenotic dilatation of the vessel, with regular patency of the superior and inferior mesenteric artery.

89

After selective cannulation of the CT with a 4 Fr Bernstein catheter, exchange of the guidewire with

90

a stiff Rosen one and pre-dilatation of the vessel with a 6x20 mm semi-compliant angioplasty

91

balloon (Powerflex, Cordis), a 7x19 mm bare-metal stent (Express, Boston Scientific) post-dilatated

92

with 7x20 mm angioplasty balloon (Powerflex, Cordis) was deployed at the point of the stenosis.

93

Final control angiography showed regular patency of the vessel and of its main branches (Fig.3).

94

The punctured artery was manual compressed. During the procedure, 5000 UI of unfractionated

95

heparin were administered. He was discharged after three days of hospitalization under single

96

antiplatelet therapy with acetilsalicilic acid 100 mg/die. Post-operatory and 3-months Doppler

97

ultrasound controls showed regular patency of the vessel without any significant variation of flow

98

velocities during inspiration and deep expiration, confirming the correct deployment and patency of

99

the stent.

100

DISCUSSION

101

Celiac trunk stenosis has been reported in older autoptic studies with an incidence ranging from

102

12.5-24% (5). Main etiological factors consist of median arcuate ligament compression, followed

103

by arteriosclerosis, pancreatitis, tumoral invasion or congenital abnormalities. According to

104

Sakorafas et al. causes can be classified into three different groups: extrinsic (mediate arcuate

105

ligament syndrome, compression induced by the celiac ganglion or surrounding fibrotic

106

transformations), intrinsic (due to arteriosclerosis) and others (including congenital malformations,

107

acute or chronic diseases, malignant invasion or compression due to chronic pancreatitis) (6; 7).

108

Another important fact which influences the presence of symptomatic disease is the existence of a

109

collateral circulation via the superior mesenteric artery. It is estimated that patients presenting celiac

110

artery stenosis will develop collateral circulation via the superior mesenteric artery (8). In patients

111

presenting chronic celiac artery stenosis, adequate collateral circulation develops in up to 80% of

112

patients (9). Only a very small proportion of patients with stenosis of CA develop symptoms

113

indicative of MALS, such as abdominal discomfort or even pain in the first two hours after food

114

intake, weight loss, or diarrhea [10]. The proposed pathophysiological mechanisms are different and

115

include: (a) postprandial hypoperfusion of the stomach, (b) expiratory hypoperfusion due to

116

repeated compression of CA by MAL during respiration, (c) progressive stenosis of the CA caused

117

by accelerated atherosclerosis due to fibrosis of the arterial wall or (d) irritation of the celiac

118

ganglion causing visceral pain and even reactive vasoconstriction [11;14].

119

In a Mayo Clinic study (12), symptoms of MALS included abdominal pain (94%), postprandial

120

abdominal pain (80%), weight loss (50%), bloating (39%), nausea and vomiting (55.6%), and

121

abdominal pain triggered by exercise (8%). However, because symptoms closely mimic those of

122

other abdominal disorders, it is commonly considered a diagnosis of exclusion.

123

Abdominal visceral ultrasound imaging (DUS) is the first diagnostic approach when CA stenosis is

124

suspected. DUS scanning can also show reversal flow in the common hepatic artery, which in these

125

patients comes preferentially from the gastroduodenal, pancreatico-duodenal and superior

126

mesenteric artery rather than from the stenotic CA (13). Thin-section multidetector CT scanners,

127

along with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, have greatly improved the ability to obtain high-

128

resolution images of the aorta and its branches. In MALS, the sagittal plane and 3D imaging are

129

optimal to visualize the characteristic focal narrowing in the proximal CA.

130

Gastric exercise tonometry has been suggested as another useful exam that can be performed in

131

patients with suspected MALS because it can detect actual gastrointestinal ischemia, thereby

132

selecting patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. This diagnostic technique has been

133

proposed by Mensink et al., who identified 29 patients with celiac artery compression using gastric

134

exercise tonometry in a prospective cohort study (14).

135

Regarding treatment choices, surgical division of MAL and diaphragmatic pillars by open surgery

136

has been so far the mainstay treatment. After laparoscopic surgery became more widespread, a

137

bigger number of patients have been reported treated with minimally invasive approach (15), even

138

using a robotic-assisted approach (16). Laparoscopic surgical treatment might be followed in certain

139

cases by the persistence of the celiac artery syndrome; therefore, it can represent the first step of a

140

hybrid strategy of treatment combined with percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the CA.

141

Baccari et. al. (17) treated 16 patients by laparoscopic transection of the MAL and only in 4 cases

142

needed to complementary angioplasty of the CA. Although PTA and stenting of TC has proved to

143

be useful as an adjunctive therapy to prior surgical MAL division, when used as the sole therapy

144

without MAL division, patient outcomes have been poor. These results may be due to the sustained

145

extrinsic pressure that the intact MAL exerts on the celiac artery, causing a chronic process of

146

intimal hyperplasia and intraluminal narrowing. Multiple case reports have demonstrated that

147

endovascular angioplasty alone is unsuccessful at achieving long-term resolution of the symptoms

148

(18-21).

149

In conclusion, laparoscopic release of CT compression by MALS is technically feasible and an

150

appealing option in centers with large experience in major laparoscopic operations. PTA and

151

stenting alone of the CT in the context of MALS should be avoided. In our experience, hybrid

152

combined laparoscopic and endovascular procedures seems to guarantee good early- and long-term

153

results.

154 155

REFERENCES

156

1. Lainez RA, Richardson WS. Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Case Report. Ochsner J

157

2013;13:561-4.

158

2. A-Cienfuegos J, Rotellar F, Valentí V, Arredondo J, Pedano N, Bueno A, et al. The celiac axis

159

compression syndrome (CACS). Critical review in the laparoscopic era. Rev Esp Enferm Dig

160

2010;102:193-201.

161

3. Kotarać M, Radovanović N, Lekić N, Ražnatović Z, Djordjević V, Lekć D, et al. Surgical

162

treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome: case report and review of literature. Srp Arh Celok

163

Lek 2015;143:74-8.

164

4. J. M. Weber, M. Boules, et al. Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome Is Not a Vascular Disease.

165

Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 30, p22-27.

166

5. Reuter SR and Olin T: Stenosis of the celiac artery. Radiology 85: 616-627, 1965.

167

6. Sakorafas GH, Sarr MG and Peros G: Celiac artery stenosis: an underappreciated and unpleasant

168

surprise in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 206: 349-356, 2008.

169

7. Serkan Burç Deşer, Savas Yuruker, Mustafa Kemal Demirag. Treatment of the Median Arcuate

170

Ligament Syndrome in a Patient with Behcet's Disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 51,

171

p325.e9-325.e11.

172

8. Berney T, Pretre R, Chassot G and Morel P: The role of revascularization in celiac occlusion and

173

pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 176: 352-356, 1998.

174

9. A. J. Doyle, A. Chandra. Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia in a 26-Year-Old Man: Multivessel

175

Median Arcuate Ligament Compression Syndrome. Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 26, Issue 1,

176

p108.e5-108.e9

177

10. Park CM, Chung JW, Kim HB, et al. Celiac axis stenosis: incidence and etiologies in

178

asymptomatic individuals. Korean J Radiol. 2001;2:8–13.11. Desmond CP, Roberts SK. Exercise-

179

related abdominal pain as a manifestation of the median arcuate ligament syndrome. Scand J

180

Gastroenterol. 2004;39: 1310–1313.

181

12. Cusati DA, Noel AA, Gloviczki P, et al. Median arcuate ligament syndrome: a 20-year

182

experience of surgical treatment. Presented at: 60th Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular

183

Surgery; June 1-4, 2006; Philadelphia, PA.

184

13. Scholbach T. Celiac artery compression syndrome in children, adolescents, and young adults:

185

clinical and color duplex sonographic features in a series of 59 cases. J Ultrasound Med.

186

2006;25(3):299-305.

187

14. Mensink PBF, van Petersen AS, Kolkman J, Otte JA, Huisman AB, Geelkerken RH. Gastric

188

exercise tonometry: the key investigation in patients with suspected celiac artery compression

189

syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:277-81.

190

15. Roayaie S, Jossart G, Gitlitz D, Lamparello P, Hollier L, Gagner M. Laparoscopic release of

191

celiac artery compression syndrome facilitated by laparoscopic ultrasound scanning to confirm

192

restoration of flow. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:814-7.

193

16. Jaik NP, Stawicki SP, Weger NS, Lukaszczyk JJ. Celiac artery compression syndrome:

194

successful utilization of robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointest Liver Dis

195

2007;16:93-6.

196

17. Baccari, P., Civilini, E., Dordoni, L., Melissano, G., Nicoletti, R., & Chiesa, R. (2009). Celiac

197

artery compression syndrome managed by laparoscopy. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 50(1), 134–

198

139. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.124

199

18. Wang X, Impeduglia T, Dubin Z, Dardik H. Celiac revascularization as a requisite for treating

200

the median arcuate ligament syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008;22(4):571-574.

201

19. Cinà CS, Safar H. Successful treatment of recurrent celiac axis compression syndrome: a case

202

report. Panminerva Med. 2002;44(1):69-72.

203

20. Delis KT, Gloviczki P, Altuwaijri M, McKusick MA. Median arcuate ligament syndrome: open

204

celiac artery reconstruction and ligament division after endovascular failure. J Vasc Surg.

205

2007;46(4): 799-802.

206

21. Matsumoto AH, Tegtmeyer CJ, Fitzcharles EK, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of

207

visceral arterial stenoses: results and long-term clinical follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995;6(2):

208

165-174.

209 210 211 212

213

Fig. 1: Angio-Computed Tomography (CTA) of abdominal aorta demonstrating the presence of a focal stenosis at the origin of the celiac axis due to an extrinsic compression induced by median arcuate ligament. Fig. 2: Focal stenosis at the origin of the celiac axis before and after resection of arcuate ligament by laparoscopic approach. To note the partial improvement in size of the celiac axis after pillar section. Fig. 3: Selective catheter angiography of the celiac artery demonstrating the persistence of the stenosis due to extrinsic compression with its fully resolution after balloon angioplasty and stenting of the origin of the vessel.