Tetrahedron Letters,Vo1.24,No.35,pp Printed in Great Britain HYDRAZINEDITHIOCARBONATE REMOVAL
OF
(HDTC)
CHLOROACETYL
Organon
Abstract acetyl
Scientific
Development
conditions,
is described.
which
The availability improvement
of convenient
of existing
chemistry.
It is essential
necessary
for halogenation
Temporary
protective
which
groups 2)
-trichloroethyloxycarbonyl Unfortunately, ethers
decreases
several
for instance,
during
during
many
now this
ester
to side
protective reactions
In this groups
group
and to present
yield
temperature
depicted
in Scheme
of thiourea
(Ia)
reaction
shown
to fulfil
usually
we wish
(see 1A.
group Table,
2 reaction
in which amide
entry
1).
,
demands
the use of these
group reactions
steps
. The
of Hg(CN12
protective
relatively
5)
group,
1)
I 2,212
groups.
and form
labile
a complex
to base
levulinoyl
3)
group
and may
be
2b) . because
chemistry.
strenuous
mild
groups.
protective
is highly 1)
under
are ally1
1)
Further-
esters.
and chloroacetyl
in carbohydrate
an improved
method
group.
treatment
it can cope Unfortunately
conditions
which
intermediate
LTa first
lITa.
of intermediate 3775
slightly
mechanism
ester
for the removal
The most
under
The two-step
of chloroacetyl to give
the conditions
give
with up to rise
1).
is thiourea entry
mild
as the
reactions.
and acetyl
in two distinctive
as a new protective
the NH2-group
IXa.
under
to present
The chlorine N
with
convenient
be removed
coupling
these
in the presence
employed
under
in carbohydrate
to withstand
ethers
4)
levulinoyl
The trichloroacetyl
be a very
bromoacetyl
in an S
the cyclic
been
in coupling
as well
that they can be removed
as benzyl
performed
and bromo-
deprotection
importance
stable
such
be removed
.
in Table,
the chloroacetyl
elevated
molecular
must
communication
of removing
forming
could
conditions
(see
6)
reactions
reactions
groups
,
GROUPS.
of chloroacetyl
groups
and of subsequent
are associated
must
protective
to be sufficiently
3)
IMPROVED
derivatives.
are of fundamental
trichloroacetyl
THE
The Netherlands.
is the selective
and persistent
of the carbohydrate
coupling
of the reaction
,
reagent
centre
BH Oss,
for the removal
groups
have
usually
coupling
The chloroacetyl
of this
protective
disadvantages
the reactivity
unstable
5340
for temporary persistent
Hg
Box 20,
groups
that do not affect
with
P.O.
procedures
conditions
2+
Group,
of the anomeric
it is a prerequisite
Ally1
Beetz
(HDTC)
FOR
PROTECTIVE
and T.
on carbohydrate
for these
REAGENT
Boeckel
temporary
removal
NEW
van
The advantage
was demonstrated
A
BROMOACETYL
The use of hydrazinedithiocarbonate
:
groups
more
AS
AND
C.A.A.
0040-4039/83 $3.00 + .OO 01983 Pergamon Press Ltd.
3775-3778,1983
widely basic
of chloroacetyl
accepted conditions
underlying is substituted
this
displaces
at
procedure
by the sulphur
The next step consists
ma
method
the alcohol
of an intraROH
(Q)
is
3776
A:
ii
+
A
H,N
CICH,COR ’
-
[N<;B&“J-NpO
+ROH
NH,
Ia
Jla
B: NH,NHQ
ii
ma
8
+
XCH,COR
lYaH
Y
+ RoH
Ib
lib
mb
ii)
to facilitate
improve
the
by enhancing The
the
with
nucleophilicity
that
the
highly
from
the
effective
possibilities
group
in that
compounds
la,
z,
was
the
for
(see
it has and%
ii)
by introduction
leaving
intramolecular
group
of
(Scheme
entry
group
at this
2
can
of the
2)
group,
displacement
bromoacetyl
2)
to give2
could
moment
little
is
group.
already
in 90% yield.
be circumvented
group,
we also
known
chloroacetyl
had the
protective
about
For
be This
by taking
sulphur a smooth
and nitrogen cleavage
intention
group
Hydrazinedithiocarbonate
iii).
nucleophilic revealed
the
by a better
result
advantage
the
properties
chemistry.
of the
and
atom
facilitate
Table,
of a bromoacetyl
under
chlorine
atom.
bromoacetyl
cleavage
iii)
realized
However,
group.
the
atom,
of a chloroacetyl
introduction
mentioned
requirements
i)
in carbohydrate
reagent
replace
nitrogen
temperature
removal
protective
bromoacetyl
Apart
that
at room
sluggish
of a bromoacetyl of the
under
i)
sulphur
of the
established
thiourea
we can
of the
mentioned
it was
cleaved shows
nucleophilicity
possibility
instance,
deblocking
P
1
SCHEME
In order
Ipb
atoms.
of developing
by applying
(HDTC
, Ib)
Model
studies
of the chloroacetyl
group
8)
a
the meets with
these
HDTC
on
at room
temperature. In a typical
experiment
and added
to derivative
and acetic
acid
room
temperature
chromatography
(0.6
HDTC 12 (0.25
ml).
without afforded2
TLC the
was
prepared
mmole), analysis
formation
in 96% yield
in situ
which
was
revealed of side (see
8)
(2
of standard
dissolved
a complete products.
Table,
ml
entry
in a mixture deblocking
Work-up 3).
solution, of
within
and purification
0.75
lutidine lo-20
mmole) (1.8
min.
ml) at
by column
3777
SCHEME
2
L
HDTC Bn OBn ,@X=CI b:X =Br
e
HDTC
XCHj 2
Bn OBn
za:x=ci b:X=Br
HDTC I
bBn ?a :X=CI b:X=Br
B” =Be”zy’8 HDTC = NH,NHC+
entry
compound
reagent
IIa
thiourea
P
ao-100°C
lb
thiourea
2
r.t.
120
90
la
HDTC
2
r.t.
10
96
lb
HDTC
2
r.t.
2
98
3a
HDTC
4
r.t.
20
88
ii ry
HDTC
4
r.t.
2
95
5a ry
HDTC
6
r.t.
15
96
HDTC
6
r.t.
2
99
z?
product
temp.
time
(min.)
30-120
yield 40-805)
(%I
3778
It was found minutes
that under
at room
Finally,
temperature
selectively
deblocked
HDTC
under
(see
Table,
entries
be cleaved
which
c)
protective
J.
without
a bromoacetyl
entry
affecting
other
described,
group
was cleaved
within
two
4). and bromoacetyl
ester
gave
functions.
protective
Thus,
groups
treatment
could
of z,
compounds4_and&respectively
be
b and 52,
in high
b
yield
5-8).
more
reagent,
References
Table,
the preliminary
much
conditions
that chloroacetyl
the conditions
In conclusion,
1. a)
(see
it was established
with
other
the same
easier
cleaves
studies
here show that a)
than the chloroacetyl
chloroacetyl
groups
presented
group,
and bromoacetyl
are not affected
b)
HDTC
protective
by HDTC
the bromoacetyl
is an easily
groups
under
Letter:,
1191
group
can
accessible
mild
9)
conditions
and notes Cunningham,
b)
E.J.
Corey
c)
J. J.
Oltvoort,
R.
Gigg
and W.J.
and C.D.
Suggs,
C.A.A.
J.
Tetrahedron
Warren, Org.
Chem..,
, J.H.
van Boeckel
38,
3224
de Koning
(1964).
(1973),
and J.H.
van Boom,
Synthesis,
305
(1981). 2.
a)
T.B.
b)
C.A.A.
Windholz van
(1980) 3. 4.
a)
V.
Schwar
b)
H.
Paulsen
z,
J.H.
van
b)
H. J.
Koeners,
c)
C.A.A. A.F.
b)
M.
c)
C.P.J. 271
Boom
Johnston,
Czech.
Biinsch,
and J.H.
and J.H. Cook
Naruto,
Letters,
2555
van Boom,
K.
Glaudemans
N.
van
Hermans, Tetrahedron
Maichuk,
J.
Naruse
and M.J.
27,
114,
(1967).
Tetrahedron
Org.
P.
2567
3126
Tetrahedron
and J .H.
J.P.G.
Ohno,
Commun., Berichte
Burgers,
van Boom,
and D.T.
Chem. Chem.
Verhoeven
van Boeckel,
Letters,
1571
Letters,
Boom,
1951
Chem.,
35,
and H.
Takeuchi,
Bertolini,
Methods
4875
Tetrahedron
Westerduin,
Letters,
(1962).
(1981). (1976)
Letters,
J.J.
. 381
Oltvoort,
(1980).
G.A.
van der
(1982).
1940
(1970).
Tetrahedron
Letters,
in Carbohydrate
251
(1979).
Chemistry,
vol
VI I I,
(1980).
E.
Walker-Nasir
7.
H.
Paulsen,
8.
A stock
and R.W.
Angew.
solution
in dioxane
(6 ml)
Jeanloz,
Chemie
of HDTC
155 (1982).
was prepared
by dropwise
solution
(30 ml,
2: 1, v/v)
15 mmole).
also T.
Curtius
3,
HDTC
S.
See
(0°C)
Res.,
also
cleaves
of hydrazine
in the presence
in UK 20 June
1983)
343
(1979).
of CS2 hydrate
(0.7
ml,
(0.73
ml,
of diisopropylethylamine
and Ft. Heidenreich, N-chloroacetyl
68,
adding
221).
presumably
(Received
Carbohydrate
Ed.,
to a cooled
Int.
in ethanol/water Bd.
Tetrahedron
Westerduin
and P.M.J. J.
6.
9.
P.
Collect.
and H.
a)
a)
and D.B.R. Boeckel,
.
Mare1 5,
,
treatment.
groups.
Ber.,
z,
58 (1894)
15 mmole) 15 mmole) (2.61 (cf.
ml,
Beilstein,