Hydrolysis of long-chain monoglycerides in micellar solution by pancreatic lipase

Hydrolysis of long-chain monoglycerides in micellar solution by pancreatic lipase

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA 317 BBA 4058 H Y D R O L Y S I S O F LONG-CHAIN M O N O G L Y C E R I D E S IN M I C E L L A R SOLUTION B Y PANCREATI...

930KB Sizes 0 Downloads 43 Views

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA

317

BBA 4058

H Y D R O L Y S I S O F LONG-CHAIN M O N O G L Y C E R I D E S IN M I C E L L A R SOLUTION B Y PANCREATIC LIPASE ALAN F. HOFMANN* ~ v

BENGT BORGSTROM

Departraent of Physiological Chemistry, University of Land, Lurid (Swedes) (Received January 9th, z963)

SUMMARY z . Certain long-chain monoglycerides have a high solubility in bile-salt solutions forming mixed monoglyceride-bile-salt micelles. Monoglycerides in such an optically clear, micellar solution are readily hydrolyzed by pancreatic lipase (glycerol ester hydrolase, EC 3.z.z.3). Using a rat-pancreatic-juice preparation containing negligible esterase activity, the hydrolysis of a number of pure monoglycerides in miceUar solution has been studied. z. The rate of hydrolysis was essentially linear with time and enzyme concentration up to a level of around 6o-7o % hydrolysis of the substrate. The extent of hydrolysis fell when the concentration of micelles of identical composition was increased. There was a broad pH optimum 5-5-7-5. Bile salts greatly enhanced the rate of hydrolysis at low concentrations, but this effect was possibly chiefly due to their dispersing et~ect; at higher concentrations, they caused a marked inhibition of hydrolysis. Typical anionic detergents influenced hydrolysis in thesame manner as bile salts. With a cationic detergent the enzyme concentration had to be considerably increased to obtain the same rate of hydrolysis. 3- z-Monoolein was not attacked to any appreciable extent by pancreatic lipase; thus the specificity of lipase for the x-ester position could be directly shown. Glycol monooleate was readily hydrol'yzed; z-a,~-dimethyl-monodecanoin was not split. 4- Under experimental conditions where z-monoolein was extensively hydrolyzed, middle-chain saturated z-monoglycerides were hydrolyzed to a very limited extent. Extensive hydrolysis could be obtained by increasing the miceUar amphiphile to micellar bile-salt ratio, by adding other amphiphiles such as fatty acid, or by using a two-phase heptane-buffer system where the monoglyceride was concentrated at the interface. The results of these and other experiments were interpreted as showing the tightness of packing of the micelle to be a critical factor influencing the extent of hydrolysis. 5. Titration of the fatty acid of a mixed bile salt-monoglyceride-fatty acid miceUe indicated a pK, of 6. 9 with the experimental conditions present.

Abbreviation: CMC, critical micellar concentration. " Present address: The Rockefeller Institute, New York 2i, N.Y. (U.S.A.).

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7o (z963) 3z7-33z

318

A . F . HOFMANN, B. BORGSTROM INTRODUCTION

Substrates for pancreatic lipase (glycerol ester hydrolase EC 3.1.1.3) are generally prepared in the form of an emulsion, and recently evidence has been presented that pancreatic lipase will attack only emulsified substrates 1. It is possible, however, to disperse lipids in aqueous solution in another type of aggregate, namely a mixed micelle, if the proper detergent is used z. Such optically clear, micellar solutions are completely stable. The concentration of lipid obtained is usually much lower than in a typical emulsion, and the ratio of detergent or amphipath to lipid is far higher than in an emulsion, where the amphipath is restricted to the oil-water interface s and composes but a minor fraction of the particle. A great deal of work has been done on the properties of micellar solutions, and substrates in such form can be considered to be rather well-defined with respect to molecular arrangement, at least when paraffin chain ionic detergents are used as the amphipath*,4-s. Some time ago, it was observed in this laboratory that certain monoglycerides had a high solubility in bile-salt solution xa. They were solubilized as amphiphiles (for definition see HOFMANN14) with saturation ratios (micellar monoglyceride/micellar bile salt) approaching 2. Monoglycerides in such optically clear solutions have now been found to be hydrolyzed readily b y pancreatic lipase. This paper presents studies on the action of pancreatic lipase on a number of pure monoglycerides, the substrate being in the form of a mixed monoglyceride-bile salt micelle. Although these experiments were undertaken with the hope that the use of micellar substrates would simplify the study of pancreatic lipase, the reverse has proved to be the case. As pointed out b y DESNUELLE1 the usual terms of enzymology are inadequate for the description of such systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bile salts were prepared by conjugation of purified cholic or deoxycholic acid according to NORMAN1~ as described 16. They were at least 97 % pure by thin-layer chromatography, theghief impurity being unconjugated acid. Bile-salt solutions were prepared which were 24 ram in bile salt and IZ6 mM in NaCl; they were thus o.15 M in Na +. Typical anionic detergents, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium oleyl taurate, and sodium p-(n-octylbenzene) sulfonate of high purity were used; they have been characterized elsewhere 14. As cationic detergent cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (T. Schuchardt, Munich, Germany) was used. Solutions, o.x5 M in Na + were prepared as described for bile salts. Buffers, o.15 M in Na + were prepared ms described 14.

Pancreatic lipase As a source of pancreatic lipase pancreatic juice, obtained from rats by cannu* BANGHAM AND DAWSON ~-u, in t h e i r s t u d i e s on p h o s p h o l i p a s e s u s e d p h o s p h o l i p i d d i s p e r s e d in buffer, which, a c c o r d i n g to t h e s e workers, w a s p r o b a b l y p r e s e n t as l a m i n a t e d s t r u c t u r e s cons i s t i n g of b i m o l e c u l a r layers of p h o s p h o l i p i d molecules w i t h t h e i r h y d r o p h i l i c p o r t i o n s a d j a c e n t a n d s e p a r a t e d b y a l a y e r of w a t e r molecules. T h e y u s e d t h c t e r m " e m u l s i o n " or " m i c e l l e " to describe t h e s e dispersions. W e h a v e used t h e t e r m " m i c e l l e " as originally defined t2, i.e., a s p h e r i c a l a g g r e g a t e of d e t e r g e n t molecules, w h i c h c o n t a i n s a liquid h y d r o c a r b o n interior a n d is in equil i b r i u m w i t h t h e u n a s s o c i a t e d d e t e r g e n t molecules. W e t h i n k it is r e a s o n a b l e a n d h e l p f u l to d i s t i n g u i s h , w h e n e v e r possible, s u c h a micellar s t a t e of a g g r e g a t i o n f r o m a dispersion of m y e l i n figures a n d e a c h of these, m o r e o v e r , f r o m a n oil-in-water e m u l s i o n .

Biochim. Biophys. A eta, 7o (1963) 317-331

HYDROLYSIS OF MICELLAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

3I 9

lation, was used. The pancreatic juice was collected over ice and lyophilized. Preparations thus prepared could be stored without loss of activity for months. Lyophili~ed preparations of rat-pancreatic juice do not show any esterase activity17. In general, the lipase preparation was dissolved in the o.x5 M buffer (pH 6.3) to a volume corresponding to zo times the original juice volume; the solution was prepared shortly before the experiment. The pancreatic juice solution could be incubated for x h at 37 ° without loss of activity. I - and 2-monogiycerides and structural analogues have been described~. Fatty acids and alkyl alcohols were commercial samples, generally Eastman Kodak (Rochester, New York). They were not characterized with respect to purity, as homologue purity was not essential to the experiments in which they were used.

Incubations Monoglyceride or other lipid was added in the appropriate solvent, generally heptane or chloroform, to sterile glass io-rnl ampoules, and the solvent removed by evaporation. Buffer and bile salt solution were added, and the ampoules shaken at 37 ° until the lipid was completely dissolved, or dispersed if the amount added was greater than its solubility. The appropriate aliquot of pancreatic lipase was added to a total volume of z.o ml. The ampoules tips were then fused in a gas-oxygen flame and the ampoules were incUbated I h, the ampoules were inspected, their contents transferred to glass stoppered test tubes, and the lipid extracted as described~. The pooled upper phases were evaporated, and the residue dissolved in a small volume of ethanol and titrated under CO2 free air with o.oz N methanolic NaOH. Control experiments had shown quantitative recovery of fatty acids from bile salt or bile salt-monoglyceride solution at pH 6.3 with no transfer of bile acids to the upper phase. The majority of experiments were performed at pH 6.3 with bile salt and monoglyceride concentrations of 6-x2 pmoles/ml and at 37 °. The Na + concentration was o.x5 M in all experiments. For experiments concerned with the influence of pH, ampoules were prepared containing identical amountsof monoglyceride and bile salt, with buffers of differing pH, but all buffers being o.x5M in Na +. Controls without lipase were run at each pH. Boiled enzyme controls were not run, but the amount of titratable material when lipase was omitted, when monogiyceride was omitted, or when a non-hydrolyzable monoglyceride was used was negligible. All experiments were run in duplicate with excellent agreement. In experiments performed with added fatty acid, identical aliquots of the fatty acid solutions used were titrated directly, and the experimental results corrected accordingly. In some experiments, the reaction products were separated by thin-layer chromatography on silicic acidl°. In order to estimate the degree of ionization of the fatty acid formed in the mixed micelle, titration of oleic acid in a sodium taurodeoxycholate-monooleinoleic acid micellar solution was performed. Titration was performed at room temperature, the solution remaining clear throughout the titration. The micellar' solution was acidified with I M HCI (to pH 2) then titrated with o.o5 N NaOH. Control .solutions containing bile salt and monoolein but no oleic acid were titrated and the resultant curve subtracted from that obtained with the micellar solutions containing oleic acid. The concentration of bile salt and monoglyceride employed were the same as those Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 70 (1903) 317-331

320

A . F . HOFMANN, B. BORGSTROM

in the hydrolysis experiments; the Na + concentration in both the micellar solution titrated and the NaOH was o.z5 M. Because of the influence of the ionized fatty acid on the remaining unionized f a t t y acid, the titration curves obtained were not symmetrical.Therefore, the p H corresponding to half neutralization was taken as the pKa'. RESULTS

Results are shown in per cent hydrolysis and in some cases are supplemented by f a t t y acid fiberated, expressed in i~equiv/ml incubation mixture. Experiments were conducted for z h; the term " e ~ e n t of hydrolysis" means the percentage hydrolysis of substrate in that time. Previous studies have defined the behavior of z-monoolein 14 and other monoglycerides" in dilute bile salt solutions. In sodium tanrodeoxycholate, the CMC with z-monoolein as the solute is about o.8 mM (see ref. z4). The concentration of micellar bile salt is the total bile-salt concentration minus o.8. The concentration of miceUar x-monoolein equals the total i-monoolein concentration as all Iomonoolein present should be in micellar form. Therefore for any concentration of bile salt and i-monoolein, indeed for any bile salt of which the CMC is known with x-monoolein as solute, the ndcellar composition is easily calculated. This is most conveniently expressed as the ratio of micellar monoolein or amphiphile to micellar bile salt or detergent and such a value will be termed the Am~Dinratio. The Am/D~ ratio will be less than the saturation ratio which is the Am/D= ratio when the micelle is saturated with

amphiphi~4. 90

100[

so,~

7O

~o 20 ~e

40

T4 I0 rain S~

lO

o~os o.~

o'~

o~eo

Lipase concn.

Fig.

[ . Effect of pancreatic lipase concentration (in arbitrary volume units) on hydrolysis of micellar I-monootein. The e x t e n t of hydrolysis was determined a t different t i m e intervals, as shown, i-Motmolein, i 2 p m o l e s / m l ; sodium taurodeoxycholate, t apmoles/ml. Sodium phosp h a t e buffer (pH 6.3) and o.i 5 M in Na + was used a t 37 ° . Volume of incubation mixture, z.o ml.

°1

~

~o

~o

Jo

~o

~o

~o

T i m e grnin)

Fig. 2. T i m e course of/hydrolysis of~ micellsr i-monoolein by pancreatic lipase. Upper curve ( @ - - @ ) : z-monoolein, 6 pmoles/ml; sodium glycodeoxycholate, 7,2 pmoles/ml; 0 . 2 ml lipase. Lower curve ( 0 - - 0 ) : I-monoolein, 6/anoles/ml; sodium glycodeoxycholate, i3.2 pmoles/ml; o.8 ml lipase. Experimental conditions otherwise as in Fig. x. The slower rate of hydrolysis of the lower curve, despite four times as much enzyme being present, reflects the lower A m/D=, ratio (see text). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (1963) 3x7-33i

HYDROLYSIS OF MICELLAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

321

Effect of enzyme concentration Fig. I shows that the percentage hydrolysis was proportional to the enzyme concentration for z monoolein up to an extent of hydrolysis of 6o-7o %. Time course of hydrolysis In Fig. 2 is graphed the percentage hydrolysis versus time at two different enzyme levels. The hydrolysis appears to be approximately linear with time, at least for the first portion of the curve.

90

"~ 6o I-

501"

30 ~ 20 O

5.0

6.0

ZO 8O 9.0 pH Fig. 3. Effect of p H on extent of hydrolysis of micellar I-monoolein b y pancreatic lipase. I n both, i-monoolein, 12 pmoles/ml; 0 - - • , sodium glycodeoxycholate (IO #moles/ml); O - - O , sodium taurodeoxycholate (io #moles/ml). The black bars represent hydrolysis occurring in the control ampoulesprcpared without lipase, i.e., non-enzymic hydrolysis. The continuous line is the difference between t o t a l hydrolysis and non-enzymic hydrolysis and 'represents enzymic hydrolysis. Experimental conditions other t h a n p H as in Fig. i ; duration of experiment, I h.

120 I 110 I 100 I -r 90~

._; 7or

t 40 30 20 10

pH Fig. 4-Titration curves of oleicacid in z-monooleJn-o]eic acid-sodium taurodeoxycholate mice]les. See METHODS. x-Monoolein, 1.6 #moles/ml; oleic acid, 4.8 p'moles/ml; sodium taurodeoxycholate, 6 gmoles/ml ( • - - • ) . i-Monoolein, 4-8/~moles/ml; oleic acid, 1.6 pmole/ml; sodium taurodeoxycholate, 6 pmoles/ml ( O - - O ) . Control t i t r a t i o n of t-monoolein, 4.8 #moles/ml in sodium taurodeoxycholate. 6 # m o l e s / m l ( m - - m ) . Control t i t r a t i o n of sodium taurodeoxycholate alone, 6 # m o l e s / m l ( D - - [ ] ) . In the t i t r a t i o n shown in the upper curve, 72 #moles f a t t y acid were t i t r a t e d ; in the curve under this, I6 #moles. The p H corresponding to half neutralization in both curves is a b o u t 6.9, b u t t h e curves are neither symmetrical nor superimposable. At p H 6.3, a slightly greater fraction of t h e f a t t y acid in the solution w i t h the higher f a t t y acid to monoglyceride ratio is ionized.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 70 (1963) 317-331

322

A.F. HOFMANN, B. BORGSTR()M

Effect of pH There was a broad p H optimum from p H 5.5 to p H 7-5 (Fig. 3). Above p H 8. spontaneous hydrolysis of micellar I-monoolein began. Titration experiments, shown in Fig. 4, indicate the pKa' of oleic acid in the mixed bile salt-monoolein-oleic acid micelle to be 6. 9. The pKa' was not significantly affected by the ratio of monoolein to oleic acid in the micelle, but the shape of the titration curve was to some extent (see legend). Thus, at p H 6.3, as the hydrolysis progresses, a greater percentage of the liberated f a t t y acid in the micelle is ionized. The charge of the micelle increases more rapidly than the number of ester bonds split. Other titration experiments, to be reported, revealed the pKa' of oleic acid in monoolein-oleic acid-bile salt micelles at higher bile salt concentrations to fall to values approaching 6.1.

Effect of bile salt concentration The effect of sodium glycodeoxycholate and sodium taurodeoxycholate on the extent of hydrolysis is shown in Fig. 5. There was a marked increase in the hydrolysis with a low concentration of bile salts. However, with higher bile salt concentrations, there was increasing inhibition. Fig. 6 shows the same experiment with the trihydroxy-bile salts, sodium glycocholate and sodium taurocholate. These bile acids have a higher CMC (see refs. 14, 20) and it is evident that extensive hydrolysis occurs below their CMC. The same enhancement of hydrolysis at low concentrations and inhibition at high concentrations was observed with the typical anionic detergent sodium p-(n-octylbenzene) sulfonate. Thus, the bile salt effect does not seem to be specific. Nor were there any differences in the effect of sodium tauro- or glyco-cholate, or sodium taurodeoxy- or glycodeoxycholate, when the higher CMC of the trihydroxy conjugates was taken into account (see legend to Fig. 6). Above the CMC, added bile salt anions are entirely incorporated into the micelles~X; therefore, the concentration of unassociated bile salt anions remains constant. The addition of bile salt accordingly results in a change in the Am/Din ratio and the inhibition observed at higher bile salt concentration must be considered with regard to changes in the micellar composition. Inhibition occurred when the Am/Din zoo 9o BO 70

j

o

_~ 6 0

0 50 ~, "r

~ 4o Q

3o

D

1

2

3

O

4 5 6 10 Bile salt concn. )umoles / ml

F i g . 5. E f f e c t o f s o d i u m g l y c o d e o x y c h o l a t e ( O - - O , [] - - [] ), o r s o d i u m t a u r o d e o x y c h o l a t e ( • - - • ) o n h y d r o l y s i s of m i c e l l a r i-monoolein. In all experiments, i-monoolein, 6 #moles/ml. U p p e r c u r v e ( O - - O, • - - • ) o. 2 ml enzyme; l o w e r c u r v e ( [] - - [3) o. o5 ml e n z y m e . E x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s a s i n F i g . z. D u r a t i o n , x h.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (i963) 317-33x

OF M I C E L L A R

HYDROLYSIS

MONOGLYCERIDES

B Y LIPASE

323

ratio was different for different monoglycerides (see below). However, for any bile salt concentration up to 20 raM, it was possible to obtain extensive hydrolysis if sufficient amphiphile was present. From the present experiments, however, a direct effect of bile salts on the enzyme cannot be excluded. A typical cationic detergent, cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide, considerably Micellor bile solt concn. ~Jmoleslml ov 111 3 4 ,' 5, 10 • i

i

1~ i

8O, o _~6o o

}so

t CMC

~ 4o 2O



°

o I

. . . .

I

. . . .

I

i.

. . .

I

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Bile SQIt concn, prnoleslml

,

o ,

,

,

I

15

20

Fig. 6. Effect of sodium taurocholate ( • - - • , [ ] - E] ), or sodium" glycocholate ( Q - - I , 00 ) o n h y d r o l y s i s of re•cellar I-monoolein, 6 p m o l e s / m l . U p p e r c u r v e ( O - - I , • - - I I ) 0.2 m l lipase. L o w e r c u r v e ( O - - O , [ ] - [] ) o.o5 m l lipase. E x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s as in Fig. I. D u r a t i o n , i h. T h e u p p e r a b s c i s s a i n d i c a t e s t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n of micellar bile salt. E x t e n s i v e h y d r o l y s i s occurs below t h e CMC. T h e c u r v e s in Fig. 5 a n d Fig. 6 are s u p e r i m p o s a b l e if p l o t t e d w i t h micellar bile s a l t c o n c e n t r a t i o n as abscissa.

BO 70 60

~.5o o

~4o I

~ 3o 2o

II f

Turbid

10 I

I

I

I

I

I

I

18 L

16 ,~~l .~_r...__.i

5



I

I

I

l

I

10 15 20 25 30 1-Monoolein conch, pmOles / ml

35

Fig. 7. E x t e n t of h y d r o l y s i s , above, a n d f a t t y acid liberation, below, of micellar x-monoolein w i t h i n c r e a s i n g AmID m ratio. • - - I I , o.2 m l e n z y m e ; O - - O , o.4 m l e n z y m e ; Q - - O , o.8 m l e n z y m e . S o d i u m g l y c o d e o x y c h o l a t e , x2 p m o l e s / m l . D u r a t i o n of e x p e r i m e n t , x h. E x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s as in Fig. I.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 70 (~963) 317-33z

324

a. F. HOFMANN, B. BORGSTR()M

decreased the rate of hydrolysis of dispersed or micellar monoolein. About a tenfold increase in enzyme concentration was necessary to obtain similar rates of hydrolysis.

Effect of substrate concentration From the pleceding, it Js apparent that substrate concentration cannot be considered in terms of the monoglyceride concentration alone. If the monoglyceride is increased while the bile salt concentration is held constant, the composition of the micelle changes; its charge per unit area decreases and it is possible there are significant changes in molecular arrangemenO 4. The results of such experiments in which monoglyceride concentration was increased with constant bile salt concentration are shown in Fig. 7, for three different enzyme concentrations. With higher monoolein concentration (and higher Am~Din ratio) there is increased hydrolysis. When the system became turbid, the extent of hydrolysis seemed to remain roughly constant despite further increases in the Am~Din ratio. A more reasonable way to increase the substrate concentrations is to increase the concentration of micelles of identical composition, experimentally done by increasing the monoglyceride and bile salt concentrations in such a way as to hold the Am~Din ratio constant. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 8. There was a decrease in extent of hydrolysis although the fatty acid liberation was roughly constant.

Experiments with different monoglycerides and structural analogues z-Monoglycerides : It has been shown that Cls unsaturated I-monoglycerides and the saturated I-monoglycerides, C~,, C~0, and C8, are solubilized in bile salt solution as amphiphiles with high saturation ratios is. The micelle is liquid 2~ and there is general agreement that pancreatic lipase attacks only liquid substrates ~. Therefore it might be predicted that in buffer alone pancreatic lipase would attack liquid substrates if they were sufficiently dispersed that the enzyme could reach the ester bond. Such Micellon bile salt concn.)imoles/ml 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,

,

,

,

,

.

.

.

.

.

80

12 7

8C

11 v

7C

-~ 5O

8

~40

6~

7}

2

31

30

70

o 5o ~4o

T

4 .~_

3O 20

20

2

10

>~

10

0 1-Monoolein concnuumoles/ml

Fig. 8. E x t e n t of hydrolysis ( O - - O ) , and f a t t y acid liberation ( O - - O ), w i t h increasing concent r a t i o n oi i-monoolein and s o d i u m glycodeoxycholate, t h e A m/Dm r a t i o being held c o n s t a n t . D u r a t i o n of e x p e r i m e n t , i h. Conditions as in Fig. i.

m

1,5 30 45 Time (rain)

12:0 10:O

60

Fig. 9. Time course of hydrolysis of i-monoolein (18: i), I - m o n o l a u r i n (12:o), I - m o n o d e c a n o i n (IO:O) and i - m o n o o c t a n o i n (8:0). Sodium glycodeoxycholate a n d monoglycerides, each 6/*moles/ml; e x p e r i m e n t a l conditions as in Fig. i.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (x963) 317-331

HYDROLYSIS OF MICEI.LAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

325

I-Mono-

was observed but only to some extent, i-Monopalmitin, i-monodecanoin and I-monomyristin are dispersed poorly in solid form in buffer; they are not hydrolyzed. is dispersed in an emulsified form in buffer; it shows a limited hydrolysis. I-Monoolein is liquid crystalline in buffer. When it was dispelsed by bile salt below its CMC, but not solubilized, it was extensively hydrolyzed (Fig. 6). In bile salt solution, with the appropriate Ara/Draratio, i-monoolein was readily attacked, i-Monopalmitin and I-monomyristin were hydrolyzed to a very limited extent, but these compounds have a very low solubility in the bile-salt micelle. The solubility of i-monopalmitiu in the bile-salt micelle can be greatly increased by the addition of i-monoolein ~°. Under these conditions, i-monopalmitin was readily cleaved. Experiments with mixed I-monopalrnitin-I-monoolein- or I-monooleinI-monolaurin micelles showed that oleic acid was preferentially liberated in both cases2~. These experiments do not necessarily indicate that pancreatic lipase hydrolyzes micellar i-monooleiu more rapidly than micellar i-monolaurin, for the availability of the ester linkages of fatty acids of different chain length or conformation m a y not be the same. Middle chain I-monoglycerides were not hydrolyzed at Ara/Dm ratios where I-monoolein was readily split (Fig. 9). This effect was not explained by their higher solubility in buffer, and was therefore studied in more detail with I-monodecanoin. Fig. IO shows that I-monodecanoin was hydrolyzed at very high Am/Din ratios.

laurin

oc 5c 40

m

-~ 3c o ao

T

#

tO

Micellar rnonoglycidelrnicelloP bile s a l t Patio (ArnlOm Patio)

Fig. IO. E x t e n t of hydrolysis of x-monodecanoin with increasing A,n]D~ ratio. Sodium glycodeoxycholate, 3.6/tmoles/ml; lipase, 0. 4 ml. Duration of experiment, z h. Experimental conditions as in Fig. i.

6°r

.54

~

~30

• 1o

or



Ls

i

o

II

or

oo..s II

q

I

~

q

r

6DC

o Detergent conch. R.4jurnoleslrnl DetePgent concn, lSX).umoleslml Fig. z i Comparison of the effect of bile salts and different anionic detergents on the extent of h y d r o l y s i s of I-monodecanoin at different A tn/D,n ratios. In all, I-monodecanoin, 6/~moles/ml. ..

Left, bile salt or detergent concentration, z. 4/~moles/ml. Right, 6 pmoles/ml. GDC, sodium glycodeoxycholate; a T , sodium oleyl taurate; LS, sodium lauryl sulfate; OBS, sodium p-(n-octylbenzene) sulfonate. Duration of experiment, I h. Experimental conditions as in Fig. I.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (I963) 317-331

326

A.F. HOFMANN, B. BORGSTROM

z-Monolaurin was also hydrolyzed if the Ara/Dra ratio was increased. The necessary was higher than that necessary for x-monoolein hydrolysis, but considerably below that necessary for I-monodecanoin hydrolysis. Bile salts and several anionic detergents behaved similarly at high Ara/D,n ratio (Fig. ix). At low ratios, i.e., at higher detergent concentrations, hydrolysis was observed only with sodium oleyl laurate. This detergent is characterized b y a high saturation ratio for the non-polar solute azobenzene 14 but a low saturation ratio for the polar solute monoolein. It m a y be postulated to form a very disordered micelle. I-Monodecanoin was also hydrolyzed in the simple two-phase system h e p t a n e buffer without added bile salt. In this system the physical state of all monoglycerides should be somewhat comparable and interestingly enough all monoglycerides showed similar rates of hydrolysis (Fig. Iz). The problem of physical state is inherent in these experiments also. It cannot be assumed for the shorter chain, less amphipathic monoglycerides, that all of the monoglyceride present in the system was concentrated at the h e p t a n e - w a t e r interface. x-=,=-Dimethylmonodecanoin was not hydrolyzed b y pancreatic lipase in agreement with previous experiments in which ester bonds containing this branched chain f a t t y acid radical were not split by pancreatic lipase *s. Structural analogues: Glycol monooleate was readily hydrolyzed. The extent of hydrolysis was similar to that of i-monoolein. However, inhibition b y bile salt was not observed until much lower Arn/Dra ratios.

Ara/Dra ratio

L i p a s e concn. ~oc

o:

. o..3. o.5,0. 7

. o.9 .

,,

gc 8C

7C 7C 6(: 5C 4C

3C 2C ¢/) 1C i C gC

~ •--

/

1-monoolein

e f

4C

Ill,

I|:1

12:0

I0:0

o 1_1 • CUr.~ n - ' ' O

- o - - "mon~'e;n

8:9

.I- 8(: # 7C 6C 5C 4C

3C 2C 1C

Ill,

18:1

12:0

I0:0

4~

0o--- " • . . . . . . , , 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.~9 Lipase, c o h e n , x 10-

8:0

Fig. z2. Hydrolysis of z-monoolein (z8:z), zmonolaurin ( 12 : O), I-monodecanoin (x o: o) and i-monooctanoin (8:o) at a h e p t a n e - b u f f e r interface. Above: 6/~moles monoglyceride, o.25 ml heptane, 5.o ml buffer. Below, ;2/Jmoles

monoglyceride, 0.5 ml heptane, 5.o ml buffer.

e., 1-monooleln

z3. Hydrolysis in i h of 2-monoolein ( 0 - - 0 ) compared to t h a t of z-monoolein (@--@). Lower curve: zo x e n z y m e concentration. In both, sodium glycodeoxycholate and monoglyceride, 6/~moles/ml. Experimental conditions as in Fig. z. Fig.

T h e buffer and experimental conditions were otherwise as in Fig. I ; duration of experiment, i h. o.2 ml lipase w a s used.

Biockim. Biophys. Aaa, 7° (I963) 3z7-33x

HYDROLYSIS OF -MICELLAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

327

2-Monoglyceride: 2-Monoolein behaves as I-monoolein in dilute bile-salt solution; its saturation ratio is identicalzs. Fig. I3 shows the hydrolysis of 2-monoolein using a favorable Am~Din ratio. The enzyme concentration has been varied over a hundred fold range. The 2-ester was not attacked at all, considering the z-isomer present at the start of the incubation period as well as the isomerization occurring during the experiment~, until very high enzyme concentrations. Thin-layer chromatography of the reaction products at the high enzyme concentrations where apparent hydrolysis took place showed the formation of di- and tri-glycerides. Thus, it is possible the hydrolysis occurring here represented cleavage of glyceride I-ester linkages and not a direct attack at the z-position. The results are in agreement with many indirect studies on the specificity of pancreatic lipase~¢,=5 Effect of added fatty acids, alcohols or z-r,,ono-ethers : In all probabihty, the monoglyceride in the monoglyceride-bile salt micelle is oriented with its polar groups at the surface of the miceUe. The fatty acid radical formed from hydrolysis of the monoglyceride probably does not reorient, although some change in the micellar size during hydrolysis is possible considering the smaller area occupied by a carboxyl group than esterified glycerol and the electrostatic repulsion of those carboxyl groups which ionize. These factors should oppose each other. Thus, during an experiment, the micellar surface is continuously changing. With time, it contains a higher percentage of carboxyl groups, some of which are ionized. It might therefore be predicted that the time course of hydrolysis would not be linear and that a decrease with time of the rate of hydrolysis would occur; this is observed in Fig. I. It is assumed that all

.~

7.:)

10,8

14,4

10.8

14.4

olo 18.0

~9of • 50 40 3O 2O 72

18.0

Fig. z4. Effect of added oleic acid (m - - a ) or glyceryl t-monododecyl ether ( ~ - - D ) on hydrolysis of micellsr i:monoolein. As a control, t-monoolein ( D - - Q ) was added in identical c o n c e n t r a t i o n . Upper diagram: 9/~moles/ml total amphiphile. Concentration: 6 #moles]ml; i-monoolein plus 3 ~moles/ml added amphiphile. Lower diagram: [ 2 ~moles/ml total amphiphfle. Concentration: 6 #moles/ml z-monoolein plus 6 ~moles]ml added smphiphile. Sodium glycodeoxychol~te was used; its concentration in pmoles/ml is s h o w n under each group of bars. Duration of experiment, z h. Experimental conditions as in Fig. [.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (z963) 3z7-331

328

A. F. HOFMANN, B. BORGSTROM

micelles in the system are in complete and instantaneous equilibrium, i.e., that the composition of all micelles changes simultaneously as hydrolysis progresses. In Fig. 14 are shown the results of adding oleic acid to the I-monoolein prior to incubation. As discussed, addition of oleic acid changes the Am~Din ratio, and controls of added I-monoolein and added glyceryl I-monododecyl ether were also run. The results showed an increased rate of hydrolysis when oleic acid was added prior to incubation; the increase was greater with oleic acid than with either of the other amphiphiles added as controls, and this effect was especially marked at higher bilesalt concentrations where hydrolysis is usually inhibited.

80 70

60 o

.~ 5C

GO

tM

N

-

~

~

i

~ 4c "o

°1 6

~ 3o 20

Alone

Acids

MG

Monoethers

Fig. 15. Effect of added amphiphile on the hydrolysis of micellar i-monodecanoin. Acids: decanoic ( i o : o ) , lauric (i2:o), oleic (18: i), linoleic (i8:2), erucic (22: i). Monoglycerides (MG): z-~,0c-dim e t h y l monodecanoin. Mono-ethers: glyceryl-i-monododecyl ether (12 : o) ; glyceryl I-monooleyl ether or selechyl alcohol (18:1). In all 6/,moles sodium giycodeoxycholate/ml and 6/*moles i-monodecanoin/ml. 3/,moles amphiphile added/ml. Duration of experiment, i h. Experimental conditions as in Fig. 1. As noted, the branched chain monoglyceride, i-mono-~,a-dimethyl decanoin is completely resistant to hydl:olysis by pancreatic lipase.

As noted previously, I-mono-decanoin was not hydrolyzed at an A,n/Dm ratio where extensive hydrolysis of I-monoolein occurred. The effect of added amphiphile on the rate of I-monodecanoin hydrolysis at an otherwise unfavourable A~n/Dm ratio is seen in Fig. 15. An increase in the rate of hydrolysis occurred on addition of a variety of amphiphiles. Of interest is the increase caused b y a variety of long-chain acids and the mono-ethers which can be considered as structural analogues of I-monoglycerides. Addition of a branched chain monoglyceride, which itself is not hydrolyzed caused a marked increase in the hydrolysis rate. DISCUSSION

It is clear that pancreatic lipase can attack substrates in a form other than an emulsion. We are not aware of any similar studies in which substrates have been used in well-characterized micellar solution, although the technique of dispersing (without further definition) of substrates in solutions of non-ionic detergents such as Tween is common. BANGHAM AND DAWSON~ - n have presented detailed studies on lecithin hydrolysis, but their substrates were in the form of suspended myelin figures, or monolayers, rather than the isotropic Solutions discussed here ; indeed these workers Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (1963) 317-331

HYDROLYSIS OF MICELLAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

329

have presented evidence that enzymic activity occurred only at the interface of their insoluble substrates and not in the bulk phase9. Monoglycerides were used in this study, because of their striking solubility in bile salt solutions. Di- a n d triglycerides have a negligible solubility in bile salt solutions~Dand cannot be used. They do have a higher solubility in solutions of nonionic detergents, and might be studied as micellar substrates in this fashion. The experimental approach is of practical value, as evidenced by the simple and direct demonstration of the specificity of pancreatic lipase for the I-ester linkage. It was similarly useful for showing the susceptibility to hydrolysis of glycol I-monooleate, as well as the resistance to hydrolysis of I-x,~-dimethyl monodecanoin. Whether hydrolysis by pancreatic lipase of micellar i-monoglyceride occurs during fat digestion and absorption in vitro is unknown. However, it could only account for a small fraction of the hydrolysis of dietary fat considering the fact the monoglycerides found in intestinal content are chiefly of the z-configuration~. The broad pH optimum 5-8 is in agreement with earlier work from this laboratory that the pH optimum of pancreatic lipase is lowered by the addition of bile saltlL The spontaneous hydrolysis of micellar I-rnonoolein at pH 8.2 and above is of interest. Although the addition of bile salts greatly increased the extent of hydrolysis, the experiments with the trihydroxy-conjugates showed clearly that this effect occurred below the CMC of the ternary system. The experiment suggests that the effect of bile salts might be chiefly attributed to their dispersing effect. The striking hydrolysis of the monoglyceride when present at the heptane-buffer interface indicates that another type of dispersion or orientation is possible. However, dispersion per se does not mean that extensive hydrolysis will occur; monolaurin is dispersed in buffer alone, yet hydrolyzed to a limited extent. Monooctanoin in molecular solution in buffer is not hydrolyzed. Thus for hydrolysis to occur, monoglycerides must not only be dispersed, but also in some type of association. Cationic detergents as cetyl-trimethylalnmoniumbromide disperse and solubilize monoglycerides but much higher concentrations of lipase are needed tor the same rate of hydrolysis. These data indicate that pancreatic lipase can hydrolyze monoglyceride present in a strongly positive, as well as a strongly negatively charged micelle. As the micellar substrates described here are rather similar to the mixed monolayer substrates used by BANGHAMAND DAWSON in their studies of phospholipases, pancreatic lipase seems to be quite different from phospholipase B or C which only attack substrates having negativelyor positivelycharged surfaces respectively8, ix. When the inhibition of hydrolysis by high bile salt concentrations was observed, it was initially considered that the charge density on the micellar surface was the critical factor, i.e, when the charge density exceeded a certain value, hydrolysis was inhibited (cf. ref. 7). This view, however, did not explain the limited hydrolysis of the middle-chain saturated I-monoglycerides; nor did it explain why the critical Am/Dra ratio for inhibition should be lower with sodium oleyl laurate than with other anionic detergents; nor did it explain the differences in the extent of hydrolysis of I-monodecanoin caused by the addition of different amphiphiles (compare the branched chain monoglyceride with the mono-ethers in Fig. 15). A more satisfactory hypothesis is proposed; unfortunately, it is also more vague. Evidence has been presented suggesting that the bile-salt micelle is more organized than ordinary detergent micelles 14. The hypothesis is advanced that a certain Biochira. Biophys. Acta, 7 ° (i963) 317-331

33 °

A . F . HOFMANN, B. BORGSTROM

amount of disorder must be present in the micelle before the monoglyceride can be attacked b y pancreatic lipase. Such disorder can be induced by (a) swelling the micelle with sufficient amphiphile, sufficient can only be defined circularly at the moment (b) adding another amphiphile which induces disorder; the marked effect of tlae branched chain monoglyceride in this respect is noteworthy or (c) using a detergent which forms more disordered micelles, the occurrence of hydrolysis with sodium oleyl laurate at Am~Dr,, ratios where no hydrolysis occurs with bile salts or sodium p(n-octylbenzene) sulfonate being an example. The concept of order-disorder in the micelle is not a new one and some experimental evidence for it has been presented~, 29. It can also be expressed as the tightness of packing of the polar groups of the molecules in the micelle. The packing arrangement for the bile-salt micelle cannot be discussed" in any detail, as nothing is known of its molecular arrangement. Also, changes in packing concomitantly change the charge density to some extent. Micellar substrates can be considered analogous to monolayer substrates, which have been used for the study of phospholipid hydrolysis 10, and it is of interest that the hydrolysis of phospholipid in a monolayer can be prevented by increasing the pressure of the monolayer, thus altering the packing of the polar groups. Lecithin is solubilized as an amphiphile in bile-salt micelles, and lecithin-bile-salt micelles might be a substrate for lecithinases. The results of the titration experiments have physiological implications, as the monoglyceride, f a t t y acid, and bile salt composition and concentration of the micellar solution used were comparable to those present in human intestinal content during f a t digestion and absorption 2°,~°. The data indicate that some fraction of the fatty acid in intestinal content during fat digestion and absorption will be ionized, as small intestinal content usually has a pH between 6 and 7 (see ref. 30). The presence of soaps in intestinal content was also predicted b y SCHMIDT-NIELSEN31 who titrated f a t t y acids solubilized in alkyl sulfate solution. However, we have not tound any previous report of such titrations of a fatty acid solubilized in a detergent micelle, other than that of SCHMIDT-NIELSEN, despite the simplicity of the experimental procedure. The pKa' of unsubstitutecg-long-chain fatty acids, neglecting all solubility considerations, and assuming no molecular association, should be about 4.8 (see ref. 31). It has been known for many years that the dissociation constant of a fatty acid at an oil-water interface is several units higher 3z. VEIS AND HOERR3z showed that the p K of a long-chain quarternary amine in water was lowered when micelle formation occurred. The well-known change in ApKa'/A concentration in solutions of anionic detergents when micellar aggregation occurs ~ is also evidence for an increase in the pKa' of anionic detergents when they are present in the micellar state. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The assistance of Miss U. HANSSONis gratefully, knowledged. This work was supported b y the National Heart Institute, United States Public HeMth Service, Grant H-53o2, Metabolism. One of us (A.F.H.) is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the National Heart Institute, United States Public Health Service.

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (I963) 317-331

HYDROLYSIS OF MICELLAR MONOGLYCERIDES BY LIPASE

331

REFERENCES P. DSSNUELLE, Advan. E ~ I . , 23 (1961) *29. s A. S. C. LAWRENCE, in K. DURHAM, Surface Activity ar,d Det~,gr~cy, Macmillan a n d Co., London, ,961, p. 158. s A. S. C. I~W~NCE, Soap, Perfunwry Cosmetics, 33 (*96o) 1177. • H. E. GARREX, in K. DURHAM, Surface Activity asd Detergency, Macmillan and Co., London, x96I, p. 29. J G. S. HARTLEY, in R. T. HOLMAN, W. O. LUNDBERG AND T. MALKIN, Proof. in the C ~ . o/Fat5 and Oth~, Lipids, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, London, *955, P. 19. e H. B. KLEVENS, Chem. ReDs., 47 (I950) I. T A. D. BANGHAMAND R . M. C. DAWSON, _/Vatu~'$, 182 (1958) 1292. s A. D. BANGHAMAND R. M. C. DAWSON, Bioc]Mm. J., 7:2 (1959) 486. 0 R. M. C. DAWSON AND A. D. BANGHAM, Biochem. J., 72 (I959) 493. x0 A. D. B~GSAM AND R. M. C. DAWSON, Biochem. J., 75 (x96o) x33*1 A. D. BANGHAM ~ D R. M. C. DAWSON, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 59 (x962) IO3. *1 G. S. HAHTLEY, Aqueous Solutions of Paraffin-chain Salts, A ctualit~s S~. I ~ u s t . 387, H e r m a n n et Cie., Paris, x936, p. 1. ,1 A. F. HOFMANN, Nature, x9o (IIO6) 196I. 14 A. F. HOFMANN: Biochem. J., 17 (I963) Z73" 11 A. NORHAN, Arhiv Kemi, 8 (I955) 33 L x* A. F. H o ~ N , Acta Chem. Stand., in the press. aT ]3. BORGSTR6M, Biochemical Problems of Lipids, B u t t e r w o r t h s Scientific Publ. London, I955, 13. 179. ,1 A. F. HOF~ANN, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (*963) 3o5 • It H. K. MANGOLD, J. Am. Oil Chemists Soc., 38 (I96*) 7o8. w A. F. HOl~S_~N AND B. BOROSTR6M, Federation Proc., 21 (1962) 43. 11 K. SHINODA AND E. HUTCHINSON, f . Phys. Chem., 66 (*962) 43. " A. F. H o l q ~ , B. BOROSTR6M AND G. ARVXDSON, unpublished experiments. u S. BSRGSTR6M, B. BORGSTROM, N. TRYDING AND G. WXST66, Biochem. J., 58 (1954) 6o4. u F. H. MAXTSOS, J. H. BENEDICT, J. B. MARTIN AND L. W. BECK, J . Ntis/'., 48 (1932) • 335B. BORGSTR6M, BioGhim. Biophys. Acta, x3 (1954) 49*m A. F. HOl~A~'qN, J. Lipid Res., 3 (1962) 391. sl ]3. BORGSXR6M, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 13 (1954) 149. m H. B. Kxatvzss, J. Chins. Phys., 49 (*952) 615. m j . H. SCKULMAN, W. STOECKINIUS AND L. M. PRINCE, J. Phys. Chem., 63 (x939) 1677. m B. BORGS~t6M, A. DAHLgVIS'r, G. LU'NDH ~ D J. Sj6vM~I,, J. cli~. I~veat., 36 (x957) 1511. al K. SCNmD~-NtX*J-SEN, Acta Physiol. Scan&, *2 (*946) sppl. 37~1 R. A. I~XBRS AND R. W. WAg~J.XN, Tra~s. Faraday Soc., 34 (1938) *537Js A. V~xs ~ D C. W. HozaR, J. Colloid Sci., 15 (*960) 427 . u A. S. C. LAWaXNC~ ASD M. P. McDONALD, in J. SCHU~,MAN,Pro¢. Second Im~t~. C o ~ . Surfac~ Ac~ioity, Butterworths Sci, Publications, London, 1957, P. 385 • *

Biochim. B ~ h y s . Ac~a,

7o

(1963) 317-33*

BBA 3 9 7 4

THE EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION OF LIPOGENIN G E O R G E N. CATRAVAS

Ds~a~4numt of Biocl~mist~, UBiveTsity of Chicago, Chicago, IIL (U.S.A.) (Received November 5th, 1962)

SUMMARY A m e t h o d f o r t h e e x t r a c t i o n a n d p u r i f i c a t i o n of ] i p o g e n i n h a s b e e n d e s c r i b e d . B y m e a n s of a l c o h o l f r a c t i o n a t i o n , c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , e ] e c t r o p h o r e s i s , a n d m a n n a n a s e treatment an approx, xooo-fold purification was achieved. The purified material c o n t a i n e d s o m e 3 o % c a r b o h y d r a t e , m a i n l y m a n n a n , a n d 7 ° % of a p e p t i d e .

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 7° (1963) 331-335