Mat. R e s . Bull. Vol. 4, pp. 8 9 7 - 9 0 4 , 1969. in the United S t a t e s .
Pergamon Press,
Inc.
Printed
H Y D R O T H E R M A L GROWTH OF SINGLE CRYSTALS OF C I N N A B A R (RED HgS)*
S. D. Scott** and H. L. Barnes D e p a r t m e n t of G e o c h e m i s t r y and M i n e r a l o g y The P e n n s y l v a n i a State University University Park, Pa., 16802
( R e c e i v e d O c t o b e r 3, 1969; C o m m u n i c a t e d by R. Roy) ABSTRACT Single crystals of cinnabar up to 2 mm in diameter and free of foreign, contaminating, solvent anions were grown h y d r o t h e r m a l l y from aqueous sodium bisulfide solutions in a rocking autoclave at 26 ° to 200°C. Of the conditions tested, optimum results were obtained when both the solubility and solubility gradient, controlled by the composition of the bisulfide solution and temperature, were highest. Stoichiometry of the cinnabar crystals is controlled by fixing temperature and f--s~ z during growth, f_s2 being dependent on pH and bisulflde concentration.
Introduction Single needed
crystals
of red, hexagonal mercuric
for studies of their electrical
for several
industrial
applications.
ments have been made on natural Attempts
to synthesize
from the vapor phase peratures bar
metacinnabar
isometric HgS) inverts
and
Until recently most measure-
cinnabar or on highly doped HgS.
have been unsuccessful
that are high enough
(black,
and optical properties
large crystals of high-purity
(1,2)
sulfide are
cinnabar
because
at tem-
for transport to occur, m e t a c i n n a -
is the stable phase.
to cinnabar
Upon cooling,
and the accompanying
decrease
* C o n t r i b u t i o n no. 69-11, College of Earth and Mineral The P e n n s y l v a n i a State University, University Park, Pa. ** Now at the D e p a r t m e n t of Geology, Toronto 5, Canada.
897
in
Sciences,
U n i v e r s i t y of Toronto,
898
SINGLE CRYSTALS OF CINNABAR
molar volume
(AV=l.753cm
For this r e a s o n stability
3
cinnabar
field,
below
Cinnabar
; 3) causes crystals
the c r y s t a l s
transition
of m m d i m e n s i o n s
low the t r a n s i t i o n
temperature
phere
(5) and h y d r o t h e r m a l l y
at 2 7 0 - 2 8 0 ° C
In this p a p e r we d e s c r i b e crystals
of fixed
in aqueous
bisulfide
essentially relatively
solutions.
Because
uously
resulting
w e r e grown
operates crystals
are
saturating
Method
and S t e m p r o k
of HgS
of c o n d i t i o n s crystals
elevated
by w h i c h
the p r o c e s s
equilibrium,
Romberger
the s o l u b i l i t y
cinnabar
technique
(6).
free of i m p e r f e c t i o n s .
Barnes,
a variety
(4).
in an argon atmos-
up to 2 m m in d i a m e t e r
Hydrothermal
measured
at 344°C
in 2 m HCI at 320°C
a hydrothermal
at t h e r m o d y n a m i c
their own
have been g r o w n be-
by s u b l i m a t i o n
stoichiometry
to fracture.
m u s t be grown w i t h i n
the r e p o r t e d
crystals
Vol. 4, No. iZ
in aqueous
up to 200°C.
could be s y n t h e s i z e d an a p p r o p r i a t e
temperature
(7) have r e c e n t l y solutions
T h e i r data suggests hydrothermally
aqueous
and p r e c i p i t a t i n g
sulfide
under
that
by c o n t i n -
s o l u t i o n w i t h HgS at
single
crystals
at a lower
temperature. The g r o w t h lined h y d r o t h e r m a l which
solids,
tamination. assembly
experiments
pressure
liquids,
is r o c k e d
two ways. recess this
coolant pressure
steel o u t e r
vessel.
to be the b e t t e r
solution
was
control
and the finger
with
without
con-
and the entire
to aid the e q u i l i b r a -
A detailed
was p r o d u c e d
However,
description
of
in the v e s s e l
in
the t e m p e r a t u r e
finger,
and an inner
circulated,
consisting
of a
tube t h r o u g h w h i c h
was
inserted
a
into the
at the tip of the finger was
a thermocouple.
coolant
of
k n o w n and could not be r e a d i l y
a cold
The t e m p e r a t u r e
monitored
sensitive
runs
jacket
(air or water)
continuously
more
In s u b s e q u e n t
axis
into
w e r e g r o w n on a cold spot in a
cold spot was not a c c u r a t e l y
stainless
found
gradient
crystals
capacity
(8).
in the head of the vessel.
controlled.
in a furnace
in the vessel.
is g i v e n by B a r n e s
At first,
in a c h r o m i u m -
can be i n t r o d u c e d
is h e a t e d
A temperature
conducted
of i.i litre
about a h o r i z o n t a l
tion of the m a t e r i a l s the a p p a r a t u s
vessel
and gases
The v e s s e l
were
as it a l l o w e d
of t e m p e r a t u r e
Compressed a wider
gradients
than did w a t e r w h i c h
range
between
tended
air was and
the
to o v e r c o o l
Vol. 4, No. IZ
SINGLE
CRYSTALS
OF CINNABAR
899
the finger. The c i n n a b a r crystalline
lumps was
(7) in t h e i r thermally
in the f o r m of p o l y -
that u s e d by B a r n e s ,
solubility
by h e a t i n g
tion a one
starting material
experiments.
Romberger
It was
and S t e m p r o k
synthesized
hydro-
at 200 ° to 300°C in a s o d i u m b i s u l f i d e
to one m i x t u r e
of m e r c u r y
and sulfur,
solu-
b o t h of 9 9 . 9 9 9 + %
purity. All crystals were grown solutions.
The pH's,
temperature
gradients were
data
(7) w h i c h
neutral
the m e r c u r y
sodium bisulfide
of s o d i u m b i s u l f i d e
c h o s e n on the b a s i s
that the o p t i m u m
alkaline
bisulfide
tota£ activity In m o r e
concentrations
indicate
to w e a k l y
in a q u e o u s
pH's w i t h i n
complexes,
of d i s s o l v e d
acid H2S s o l u t i o n s
conditions
are n e a r -
the s t a b i l i t y
species
HgS e x h i b i t s
a f u n c t i o n of t e m p e r a t u r e w i t h i n
of the s o l u b i l i t y
fields
Hg(HS) 3 and H g S ( H S ) ~ - ,
sulfide
and
at a
(ZS) g r e a t e r
retrograde
the t e m p e r a t u r e
of
than
solubility
1.0. as
r a n g e of i n t e r e s t
(9). In a t y p i c a l run reagent grade NaOH required were
15 to 25 g m of HgS to give
s e a l e d into the p r e s s u r e
50 m i c r o n s . weighted tained
H2S
(99.5+%)
through
the d e s i r e d N a H S
v e s s e l w h i c h was
and d e g a s s e d ,
into the v e s s e l .
and the a m o u n t of concentration
then e v a c u a t e d
to
deionized water were
The s o d i u m b i s u l f i d e
s o l u t i o n was ob-
the r e a c t i o n H2S + N a O H + H20 + N a H S
w h i c h goes was
effectively
adjusted
amounts
at r o o m t e m p e r a t u r e
of N a H S
equilibrate
and H2S
were
in T a b l e
calculated
i.
The pH of e a c h
by c a r e f u l l y
in the vessel.
the s o l u t i o n The r a n g e
marized
to c o m p l e t i o n .
solution
balancing
The v e s s e l was
the rocked
to
and then heated.
in c o n d i t i o n s
of the e x p e r i m e n t s
The p H ' s w e r e
all n e a r n e u t r a l
are sum-
at 20°C and
f r o m the r e a c t i o n s NaHS = Na +
+ HS-
and
H2S = H + + HSfor w h i c h the r e s p e c t i v e e q u i l i b r i u m c o n s t a n t s are 5(10) and -6.88 i0 (ii). At the t e m p e r a t u r e of the e x p e r i m e n t s , the pH's were
slightly more
alkaline
than calculated
e f f e c t of t e m p e r a t u r e
on the i o n i z a t i o n
and on the s o l u b i l i t y
of H2S in w a t e r
at 20°C due to the
constants
(i0).
of H2S and N a H S
For e x a m p l e ,
the
900
SINGLE
calculated line
for run
relative
tions The
pH
within
solubilities
Romberger
OF CINNABAR
pH of 5.8.
the o p t i m u m
of HgS w e r e
solution
and the
and S t e m p r o k
cold
the
The b e s t
solubility
gradient
were
crystals
ranging
cess
the h i g h e s t
in the h e a d
finger
all of the s o l u -
at r u n
temperatures.
from
the d a t a
were
obtained
are
of B a r n e s ,
from run
runs.
vessel.
ger
euhedral
lined
Subsequent using
a re-
runs
were
the c o l d
for a v a r i e t y
solubilities ture
and
gradients of
tempera-
to study
the e f f e c t
~
variables
........ !i .....
In r u n
ii a d r u s e
stals,
1 m m thick,
were
cold
Cinnabar
within 0.5 m m
those
crystals from run S q u a r e s are 1 mm.
of s p o n t a n e o u s
the s o l u b i l i t y both
runs,
ed the
masses
surface
t i o n of
the
solubility
of the
gradient
for c r y s t a l and
in runs
crystals,
of HgS
were
1 clearly
growth
12 and
As
shown
finger
in
cry-
in d i a m e t e r , smaller
than
106 b u t
as w e l l
13 w e r e than
solution
solubility
that
of HgS
gradient.
coat-
reduc-
and of the
were
the b e s t
In
ii,
further
a n d no c r y s t a l s
demonstrates
solubility
in run
14,
the
by r e d u c i n g
unsuccessful.
those
in run
formed.
to c o n t r o l
finger
in the n u t r i e n t
too s e v e r e
are h i g h
a large
on the c o l d
smaller
finger.
solubility
Table
solution
of
coated
the m a s s
from run
equally
nucleation
gradient
of cry-
106. Attempts
amount
rates.
Individual
considerably i.
these
on g r o w t h
the e n t i r e
stals
fin-
of
iii~!
a week.
both
solubility
red,
(Fig.l)
made
in
106 w h e r e
and the Deep
in d i a m e t e r
of the p r e s s u r e
summarized
solution
of all f i v e
1 to 2 m m
FIG.
of
and D i s c u s s i o n
in the a q u e o u s
from
alka-
for the t e m p e r a t u r e s
of the e x p e r i m e n t s
crystals
of HgS
pH r a n g e
1.3 u n i t s
12
(7).
The r e s u l t s i.
is
However,
calculated
Results
Table
Vol. 4, No.
ii at 150 ° is 7.1 w h i c h
to a n e u t r a l
remained
the a q u e o u s
CRYSTALS
grown.
conditions
in the n u t r i e n t
We w e r e
unable
to de-
Vol. 4, No. IZ
SINGLE CRYSTALS
crease sufficiently taneous
the spon-
OF CINNABAR
tl-4 , ~ O ~
nucleation of HgS on
C~
Lr~
I
the cold finger by manipulating the HgS solubility temperature gradient,
and
although
•
0 V
0
;--I
~0
O4
O -,-4 r./l I~-
seed crystals
L~
'
0 V
U? r..)
this problem might be overcome by attaching
Lrb
•
0
901
~
to
4J
C~
the cold finger.
0
Although our method of growing
q3
cinnabar crystals o.,-I
is more complicated
.~
than that
0
0
0
0
0
(1)
described by Rau and Rabenau
J
(6), there are two distinct advantages
~
0
of using sulfide
solutions•
First,
0
our cry-
04
stals are free of the potentially contaminating present
0 0
anions
Rabenau.
crystals
solutions
,-4m~ .,..t o ..Q ~-4 .,q ~o-w
it
o
to grow cinnabar
of different
hiometries
(1) d)
in aqueous because
~ 0
0
0
sulfur fu-
This principle
is explain-
ed with the aid of Figure
2.
A l t h o u g h growth conditions temperatures
and values of ZS different from those illustrated,
the
shape of the d i a g r a m
m
g
-,--I ~
4~ N ~ C) lalO
~ O -,-t 4~
• ~
O m
0 0
P~ ¢',1
',,0 C'q
L~ I.~
O a~
(1)~ ~ O
m
m
r~ Ca
r~
m O :>1 ~ m ~.~ .-C .~ ~J
~
m O
~ O L~
0 L~
0 ~
I.~ ~0
L~
~0 04o
~
4.-I ~.I
4-1
~.~
O
r~ ¢
~
- ,---t
,-4
,-.-t m
r.)
r..) >
L~ ::>I o ] 4.~ -;--.I
o,I
and indi-
cates the chemical relations
-,-t
0
0
0
0
0
~
~
00
o
,--I
remains u n c h a n g e d
.£1
.,--t
sulfide
tude as a function of f o 2 and
O rd ON O-~-t 4J
0
t~
(f_s2) can be varied
were at various
~ r~ 0
0
0 ;.--t
stoic-
over several orders of magni-
general
0 0 r.-I
r--I
<
More importantly,
is possible
pH.
0 L~
in the strong chloride
solutions used by Rau and
gacity
0 ~
Ord
of consequence here. ~0
~:~ O ,--4
~-t ~
~ ~
~ ~
~1~ ~
90Z
SINGLE CRYSTALS
OF CINNABAR
Vol. 4, No. IZ
-50
-40
o
-50 N
O %.
-.1
-60
-70
-80
2
4
6
6~
I0
P2
pH FIG.
2.
Distribution of predominant, sulfur-containing, aqueous ions and molecules at i00°C and ZS = 0.i. Fugacity of S 2 is contoured in atm. After Barnes and Kullerud (12).
Within buffered
the optimum pH range
and the solutions
and within
over ten orders
Thus it is expected
in sulfur
conditions
below the HS-/SO~-
the required
of magnitude
that cinnabar
acid end of the boundary
richer
S0~- + 4H 2 + H +
lie on or slightly
this boundary
continuously
more
growth ~O 2 is
by the reaction HS- + 4H20 ~
Along
for cinnabar
pH range f_s2 varies
as a function
crystals
and therefore
boundary.
of pH.
grown at the relatively at higher f_s2 will be
than those grown under relatively
more
alkaline
and lower -of~2"
Acknowledgement This study was supported Projects Materials
Agency,
Contract
Research
and by the National
DA-49-083,
Laboratory Science
by the Advanced OSA 3140,
through
of The Pennsylvania
Foundation
Research the
State University
with grant GP-2597.
Vol. 4, No. IZ
SINGLE
CRYSTALS
OF CINNABAR
903
References l.
O. L. Curtis,
2.
H. S a s a k i
3.
R. A. Robie and D. R. W a l d b a u m , 1259, p.15. U.S. G o v ' t P r i n t i n g
4.
F. W. D i c k s o n
5.
G. G. Roberts, E. L. L i n d and E. A. Davis, Solids 30, 833 (1969).
,
Jr.,
J. Appl.
and S. Kisaka,
Phys.
Japan.
and G. Tunell,
H. Rau and A. Rabenau,
33,
2461
J. Appl.
(1962).
Phys.
Am. M i n e r a l o g i s t
5,
331
H..L. Barnes, 957 (1967).
S. B. R o m b e r g e r
and M. Stemprok,
,
H. L. Barnes,
Econ.
1054
(1963).
625
(1964).
9.
F. W. Dickson,
i0.
H. L. Barnes, H. C. H e l g e s o n and A. J. Ellis, P h y s i c a l C o n s t a n t s , p.401. Geol. Soc. A m e r i c a
ii.
M. W i d m e r (1964).
12.
H. L. B a r n e s
Econ.
Geol.
59,
and G. S c h w a r z e n b a c h , and G. Kullerud,
Helv.
Econ.
Chem.
Geol.
44,
471
J. Phys.
7.
58,
170
(1964).
U.S. G e o l o g i c a l S u r v e y Bull. Office, W a s h i n g t o n (1968).
Solid State Comm.
Geol.
~,
Chem.
(1967). Econ.
Geol.
62
H a n d b o o k of M e m . 9 7 (1966).
Acta
56,
(1959).
648
47,
266
(1961).